Slashdot Mirror


Mars Probe May Have Spotted Sojourner Rover

Maggie McKee writes "NASA's eagle-eyed Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter may have spotted the tiny, toaster oven-sized Sojourner rover just a few meters away from its companion, the Mars Pathfinder lander. It appears to have crawled there in an attempt to re-establish contact with the lander after the lander had already died. But the pictures aren't clear enough to definitively ID the rover, and it's possible Sojourner simply took off on its own. If it were miraculously still alive after 10 years, it could be 3 kilometers away from Pathfinder — and probably impossible to find, even with MRO."

149 comments

  1. I spy by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spy with my litle eye something that starts with S.

    SOJOURNER? Yay!

    1. Re:I spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sojourner Rover: WHAZZUP!!!

      Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter: WHAZZUP!!!

      Sojourner Rover: Not much, just chillin'...

  2. Don't let them mate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Else they'll multiply like rabbits

    1. Re:Don't let them mate! by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
  3. Rover by master_kaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Red Rover, Red Rover, Let Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Come Over

  4. HTML version of Sojourner pic by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 5, Funny

    .

    ;-)

  5. Dad .. Dad ???? by UberHoser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry, the image of the little one crawling to it's dad after a crash.. kinda choked me up ....

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
    1. Re:Dad .. Dad ???? by chrisb33 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the same thing... poor little guy, trying to nuzzle under the lander like Simba in the Lion King. Now all we need is for Spirit and Opportunity to come over and sing "Hakuna Matata!"

    2. Re:Dad .. Dad ???? by skoaldipper · · Score: 0

      For all you whooper snappers out there, Silent Running with Bruce Dern. One of my all time favorites and very apropos here.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    3. Re:Dad .. Dad ???? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Awesome movie... which one is Sojourner? Huey, Dewey or Louie?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:Dad .. Dad ???? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah; I had this image of Sojourner cuddling dejectedly next to Pathfinder, occasionally letting out a small electronic whimper.

      I'll bet that we're not the only ones with such thoughts.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:Dad .. Dad ???? by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      I think it's just how it was worded, that the rover crawled back to the lander after it lost contact with it. Then I thought of robot ethics - did Sojourner return to the lander out of a programmed feeling of need or loneliness, or did it simply return because it wanted to know what to do next?

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
  6. Batteries not included by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was anyone else reminded of the scene when the one robot finds the other one after the guy hit it with an axe? Poor little robot...

    1. Re:Batteries not included by ystar · · Score: 1

      Ughhhh...that movie was so sad, it actually hurt to watch it as a five year old boy. Which is unique as far as my memory of movies go. I must have not been desensitized yet - it was probably my introduction to non-cartoon violence, save for the live-action TMNT. Heck, It's probably just that I valued technology more than human lives back then too!

    2. Re:Batteries not included by ystar · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute! I thought you were talking about Short Circuit! http://youtube.com/watch?v=9ZJoPpda5Ik

    3. Re:Batteries not included by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Sheesh! I waste enough time reading Slashdot as it is, and now you've got me watching movies on the internet? No wonder I never get anything done.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by BubbaFett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Mars so boring now that we're just sending things there to look at other things we've sent there?

    1. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by MyHair · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From TA I gather they wanted to see what Sojourner did after losing contact...how did its programming to return to base play out?

      I'm guessing it's also a sanity check of several factors.

      Plus it's nifty cool!

      Lastly, perhaps seeing how various known objects appear on the images will help them look for crash sites like Beagle's. MPL presumably is flying through space somewhere, but if they weren't confident of that they could look for its crash site, too.

      Even more lastly it's probably interesting to see how the weather affects conditions around long-sitting known objects. Do dunes build up? Do they get dusty or does the wind clean them? Etc.

    2. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by x2A · · Score: 1

      Haha, beginning on Time Trumpet (episode 6) -

      "It's 2031, and we've accomplished so much, we're actually running out of things to do. NASA has just sent a probe to Mars to look for the five pound note they hid there two years earlier."

      Very funny. Anyone who liked The Day Today will like Time Trumpet.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FYI, the data from NASA spacecraft is generally private to the primary investigator for the instrument in question for a year, after which it's made public. Though, of course, the PI can decide to release bits and pieces sooner if they want to. This is to give these scientists the first crack at analysis and the ability to release papers before other scientists who didn't have a hand in running or designing the mission.

      I would speculate that these "let's see if we can spot Pathfinder, Spirit/Opportunity, etc." pictures are a small part of the imaging plan, but since they are unlikely to contain the same level of science return as other targets, they make good fodder for early release to the public.

    4. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i would love for them to aim hubble at Voyager 1/2 and see what they see .. wouldn't that be cool

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by sparky555 · · Score: 2, Informative

      MPL isn't flying through space - it did crash, and they did try to image it. http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/050601_mpl_cl ues.html

    6. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by CorSci81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They wouldn't see anything. Hubble can just barely make out Pluto's newly discovered 2nd and 3rd moons, and the Voyagers are a hell of a lot smaller and much much further away.

    7. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Oops. You're right. I should quit relying on my memory for posting any facts.

      Wasn't there some Mars craft that is hurtling aimlessly in space now? Maybe I'm remembering MCO, but this article says it probably burned and broke up in the atmosphere.

    8. Re:Rovers are signs of intelligent life! by Pooua · · Score: 1

      MyHair: "Wasn't there some Mars craft that is hurtling aimlessly in space now?"

      There are several Mars probes that match that description, but you are probably thinking of the billion-dollar Mars Observer, which was lost in 1993.

      FYI, more than half of the missions launched to Mars have failed. Many of those failures continued sailing on through space.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  8. wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by mdm-adph · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...in a dorky kind of way.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    1. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by Gax · · Score: 1

      Any bets that Disney will make a kids movie called Little lost Rover?

    2. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by Pinkfud · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. It's like Marvin the paranoid robot. "I can't do what I was supposed to do. My existence is meaningless. Guess I'll just stand over here and rust".

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    3. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by rcatarella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Robots hate to be anthropomorphized ;)

    4. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Any bets that Disney will make a kids movie called Little lost Rover?

      No, but Futurama will do "Martian Bark". Poor Sojourner Seymour.

    5. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The summary makes it sound like a poor, helpless little critter to be pitied. Aww....

    6. Re:wow, this is actually kind of sad.... by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      Disney huh... so when the little orphaned robot learns how to love the martians adopt it and bring it to live in their glorious underground city. (I just threw up in mouth a little)

      --
      We are all just people.
  9. Re:wow... its not impossible by Foryst · · Score: 1

    It was probably taken by whoever stole our herds of sweet sweet Buggalo.

  10. Hi Martians! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a little robot.
    I'm a little robot who is lost.
    I'm a little robot who is lost from Earth.
    If I'm a little robot who is found, please call the interstellar hot line 1-800-LOSTROBOTS.

    1. Re:Hi Martians! by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Princess Vespa: I don't have to take this. I'm Rich!
      DOT Matrix: What are you going to do?
      Princess Vespa: I'm calling my father! 1-800-DRU-ID-I-A

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:Hi Martians! by smorken · · Score: 1

      if I looking for robot
      him name is Sojourner red robot
      I lost my frog
      301-286-2000
      Love,
      NASA
      P.S. I'll find my robot
      Who took my robot
      Who found my robot

    3. Re:Hi Martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone number in the parent is, in fact, the # of the Goddard switchboard.

  11. What about Mars program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder why don't they try to image probes from Russian Mars probe program? It would be interesting and important to know why did they ultimately failed. Mars 2 and 3 even had small rovers which maybe could be imaged, if they were deployed.

    1. Re:What about Mars program? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      MRO has only been on station a few months, since March. Imaging these four American landers were probably higher priorities than older Soviet landers. One might also ask when we'll get images of the defunct Beagle 2 lander from the ESA's Mars Express mission. It died somewhere on descent.

      Give JPL enough time, I'm sure they'll locate every little man-made scap we've placed on the surface of Mars.

    2. Re:What about Mars program? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I believe they hope to, but first they need a good idea of where to look for them; the higher the camera resolution, the smaller the area of the surface they can search at any time.

      There was some discussion about looking for the Russian probes on the www.unmannedspaceflight.com forums.

    3. Re:What about Mars program? by DestroyAllZombies · · Score: 1

      MRO has been trying to image Beagle 2 based on possible locations from MGS. But there have been some minor problems so the targeting was off. There will be another try soon, and then a new planning cycle will try to fit it in. But the observations are generally chosen by the scientists for each experiment (in this case HiRISE) so if they want science instead of PR, then Beagle will have to wait.

      --
      This login name for sale.
  12. Callous and heartless by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny
    So when contact with the lander, which was designed to last one month, was lost after three months, ground controllers were not sure what became of Sojourner.
    What callous monsters these NASA people are! Poor Sojourner was left to wander around with no means of communicating back home, while dying a slow and lonely death. I had to wipe the tears from my eyes as I read that story.
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Callous and heartless by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      I felt so sad when I thought of Sojurner wandering around aimlessly, slowly dying itself, while searching for its big brother Pathfinder, who had already died... *tear*

      I think I'm watching too much anime at this point...

    2. Re:Callous and heartless by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Poor Sojourner was left to wander around with no means of communicating back home, while dying a slow and lonely death.

      It will meet up with Spirit and together they will party and have children. They are the Adam and Eve of Mars. 6000 years from now billions of robots will read about them in Genesis of the Mars Bible. But the Mars evolutionists will insist Sojourner evolved from toasters and staplers instead of having a Creator (JPL).

    3. Re:Callous and heartless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Mars evolutionists will insist Sojourner evolved from toasters and staplers instead of having a Creator (JPL).

      Phewy! Every martian knows Sojo was created by the Flying Fork Monster.

    4. Re:Callous and heartless by Hercynium · · Score: 1

      You win the thread! That was the first post in a long time that made me want to be a moderator again!

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    5. Re:Callous and heartless by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      Best. Slashdot. Post. Ever.

    6. Re:Callous and heartless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that you are a creationist?

      Good job.

    7. Re:Callous and heartless by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      But the Mars evolutionists will insist Sojourner evolved from toasters and staplers instead of having a Creator (JPL).

      Ah yes, while the faithful will quietly and solemnly intone the names of the Father (NASA), the Son (JPL), and The Holy Spirit (Aerospace engineering).

      Awesome. Reminds me of the story from I, Robot where the robot takes over the power transmission station on Mercury and basically develops a religion around keeping the power beam properly focused.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:Callous and heartless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Mars evolutionists will insist Sojourner evolved from toasters and staplers instead of having a Creator (JPL). But the robots from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster know that those 'toasters' are really just His Noodley Appendage.....
    9. Re:Callous and heartless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen the movie Screamers?

  13. Can anyone make out the pic details? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My eyes and monitor are good, but I can't tell what the labels are to. Couldn't anyone draw a line to whatever the item is that they think is the rover? I'm just not seeing it at all. It's like where's Waldo in black and white but with a much, much smaller Waldo.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      You're not alone. I can't make out anything that doesn't look like Martian rock. Is everyone looking at a different picture or something? Am I blind??

    2. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the mis-spelling of "Heatshield" on the picture doesn't exactly look too professional either.

    3. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by fmackay · · Score: 3, Informative

      This high-res version of the image has pointers to the objects of interest - I still can't figure out which pixel is supposed to be the rover though.

    4. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by duguk · · Score: 1

      Ah, the delight of viewing a 4MB Nasa image, looking like it was done in MS Paint... With SHIELD spelt wrong.

      DugUK

    5. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the hi-res link. The backshell and parachute look convincing. From there, they can take images that pathfinder took and extrapolate where it should be relative to those two. Turns out there is a bright spec there "MPF", with possibly a much smaller bright spec very close to it -- that would be Sojourner, possibly.

    6. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly it looks like that misspelling is from NASA...

    7. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to the image posted the MRO site. Full 6.3MB JPEG! http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/gallery//press/200701 10a/picture-3.jpg

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Can anyone make out the pic details? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      that is one heck of a wasted piece of terrain... wherever you look it's part of a crater...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  14. How bad is the American science culture? by gorehog · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's so bad that the editors of the article forgot to include a scale to indicate the actual size of the area in the image.

    1. Re:How bad is the American science culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, given that New Scientist is a British magazine.

  15. Two probes enter by Cylix · · Score: 2, Funny

    One probe leaves...

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    1. Re:Two probes enter by Skadet · · Score: 1

      ...and later the other probe leaves, after being declared the winner.

  16. Brave Little Toaster by ToxikFetus · · Score: 1

    I think I saw the prequel to this movie when I was a kid...

  17. Robot helplessly trying to locate dead mother. by krunoce · · Score: 1
    This is a "robot revenge on humans" story waiting to happen!

    I suggest the following survival guide: How To Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself Against the Coming Rebellion

  18. can it be used again? by sup2100 · · Score: 1

    If the rover is still functioning can it be used to take more measurements? Would there even be a point, or has the rover been made obselete by the newer ones?

    1. Re:can it be used again? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Negative. Sojourner talks through Pathfinder. Since Pathfinder's dead, Sojourner's mute. Crudely speaking, look at it as a DSL line with your PC as Soj and the modem as Path. Dead modem, the PC doesn't talk to NASA.

    2. Re:can it be used again? by sup2100 · · Score: 1

      Thats true, but following the same analogy, couldn't the modem be replaced? I assume that its communicating through some wireless protocol and if another probe were to mimic that protocol, communications could be restored. However, I doubt that another probe has the same capabilites, in which case Sojourner would be useless.

    3. Re:can it be used again? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      The modem could be replaced, but (sticking with the same analogy) you'd have to call your DSL company and they'll probably ship over the same model. Hence NASA would have to build, launch and land Pathfinder #2, at around the same spot...assuming Soj still has power.

  19. The Onion was way ahead on this one by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    an infographic listing the challenges NASA faces with the rovers, and one of them is "Must maneuver around burnt-out hunks of failed probes littering Martian surface"

    1. Re:The Onion was way ahead on this one by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      the challenges NASA faces with the rovers, and one of them is "Must maneuver around burnt-out hunks of failed probes littering Martian surface"

      There is a hallarious youtube movie about a bunch of smashed up probes littering the ground. They all fail in different goofy ways. Quite clever. A Squidward-like martian comes out of a hole and gathers the severed probe antennas up as flowers for his girlfriend. Just when he is about to give her the "flowers", yet another wayward probe smashes into the viewer (us) as they run for cover. I'll see if I can re-find it. Topnotch geek humor.

    2. Re:The Onion was way ahead on this one by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      I think if you look at the NASA image, and look at the crater in the central area of Quadrant 1 - that looks a lot like it could have been made by Beagle.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:The Onion was way ahead on this one by ray-auch · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess it's this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjiGH9QNiU0

      Definitely worth finding.

    4. Re:The Onion was way ahead on this one by camperdave · · Score: 1

      that looks a lot like it could have been made by Beagle.

      Sigh!

      Beagle crash landed about a quarter of the way around the planet from Pathfinder.

      It's like looking at a satellite image of Washington DC and saying "Hey, Is that Buckingham Palace?"

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  20. MarsClock for Palm Pilots by HoneyBeeSpace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to geek out and track the lifespan of the various Mars missions, you can do so on your Palm with MarsClock. If you want the desktop version check out Mars24. Both should be updated for Pheonix sometime this year.

  21. HOLY CRAP by everphilski · · Score: 4, Funny

    ;-)

    is that a face I see on Mars?

    1. Re:HOLY CRAP by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      is that a face I see on Mars?

      Naw, its just Venus's light reflecting off an EBCDIC printout.

  22. Dyslexic by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read that headline as "Sigourney Weaver"?

    I'm going to go crawl into my hole now...

    Aikon-

    1. Re:Dyslexic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A toaster oven sized Sigourney Weaver? She'd be hot.

    2. Re:Dyslexic by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      Did anyone else read that headline as "Sigourney Weaver"?
      I'm going to go crawl into my hole now...

      Speak for yourself. I'll be in my bunk...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  23. *Much* better pictures on NASA site by ashitaka · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a collection of much higher resolution pictures on the NASA site to the point you can see the ramps on the lander.

    It is difficult to see whether the sojurner rover is nearby or not. The programming was set to make it do so but I like the thought of an intrepid little robot setting off on it's own.

    "It's a magical world, Hobbes old buddy. Let's go exploring"

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      s/it's/its

      {Sigh} Ruined one of my better posts...

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Eh? Weren't you correct in your original post?

    3. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. "It's" is only a contraction for "it is". However, its/it's the only form of apostrophe misuse that doesn't make me want to kill someone, because it's somewhat understandable.

    4. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Expand the contraction and see if it makes sense:

      "...setting off on it is own"

      See? Doesn't work.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    5. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Then it is correct in the original post, because you would expand the contraction to

      "It is a magical world..."

      Anyway, that's how Bill Watterson wrote it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_and_Hobbes

    6. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Oh bother, didn't even see the "it's" above that line. I had to re-read it like 3 times after seeing this wondering 'wtf did THAT line come from?'

      Yea, I think that's where the OP's first responder got confused too I bet, because you have another 'it's' right below it.

    7. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by bcmm · · Score: 1

      And the high res image is gone.

      You know a Government agency is underfunded when you can slashdot it from a post halfway down the page.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    8. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by ElAsturiano · · Score: 1

      can you say 'slashdotted'?

      --
      http://frag-legion.uk.net/wiibar/mario-57327995510 90669.png
    9. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2, Informative

      6.2MiB, 4000x4000 pixels
      http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/gallery//press/200701 10a/picture-3.jpg
      Naw, they just aren't checking all their links.
      Is a little further down the page.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    10. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by Icculus · · Score: 1
      The part that's wrong is:
      an intrepid little robot setting off on it's own

      should be "its"

    11. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Ah... I thought you were referring to your quote at the end. I see where the issue is now. My bad. :-)

    12. Re:*Much* better pictures on NASA site by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The programming was set to make it do so but I like the thought of an intrepid little robot setting off on it's own.

      I've never seen such devotion in a droid before...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. Stop wasting this technology on other planets by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're spending all this money so we can spot a lost robot millions of miles away, so why can't we point it back at earth and help me find my KEYS!

    GAAAAH!

    1. Re:Stop wasting this technology on other planets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because hopefully your keys aren't the size of a toaster oven...

    2. Re:Stop wasting this technology on other planets by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We're spending all this money so we can spot a lost robot millions of miles away, so why can't we point it back at earth and help me find my KEYS!

      Because Southwest Airlines accidently routed your keys to Mars.

  25. The ultimate scavenger hunt by nizo · · Score: 2

    After we colonize Mars, the first one to find it gets a 25 million dollar coffee table for their new home!

    1. Re:The ultimate scavenger hunt by pluther · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's actually only a $49.00 coffee table. The rest is Ikea's home delivery charge.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  26. That's because you crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's because you crazy: (see link for more details)

    http://www.ineedcaffeine.com/unboring.php

  27. Viking landers by abigor · · Score: 2

    What most amazes me are the Viking landers. Looking at some of the pictures they took, the quality is just great. And they kept transmitting information for years - I think Viking 2 finally died in 1982 or something, six years after landing. Cult 1970s technology!

    1. Re:Viking landers by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      What most amazes me are the Viking landers. Looking at some of the pictures they took, the quality is just great. And they kept transmitting information for years - I think Viking 2 finally died in 1982 or something, six years after landing. Cult 1970s technology!

      Not to denigrate that "cult 1970's technology," but what's really sad about this is how pretty much all of our post-Viking landers have been limited by batteries and solar cells, whereas the "old" 70's tech had long-lived radioisotope thermal generators (RTG). What a pity the anti-nuke crowd is so paranoid that we're forced to limit the exploration of Mars because their knee-jerk reactions to anything nuclear border on the hysterical.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    2. Re:Viking landers by abigor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fully agreed, I have long been a proponent of nuclear power - I can remember talking about this nearly 10 years ago, and not just for powerplants in spacecraft, but also as the real answer to air quality issues, foreign oil dependence, and so forth. To be honest, there is a significant number of enviro types who are pro-nuclear, but they tend to be in the rationalist camp. The emotional camp, always the larger and more vocal of the two, consistently drowns out the rationalists in any debate.

      It was such emotional arguments that cancelled the U.S. Integral Fast Reactor back in the '90s (I think it was), and has retarded the deployment of reactors in general all over the place in favour of coal, etc.

    3. Re:Viking landers by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      The scope of these missions and the power needed makes RTG a wasted expense. Now that exploring mars is 'hot' and theres more money/congressional interest the next genertion of rovers will have on-board RTGs. No hippies to blame.

    4. Re:Viking landers by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're confusing dates and events, but essentially yes. Viking 2 failed in 1980 after 3 1/2 years due to battery failure. Viking 1 survived for over six years until 1982. It didn't actually die on its own, we broke it. An update to the battery charging software overwrote the antenna positioning software and contact was lost.

    5. Re:Viking landers by abigor · · Score: 1

      Sorry, got them confused. Thanks for the correction.

  28. "Junkyard Planet" by AlHunt · · Score: 1


    We're going to *have* to colonize Mars just so we can issue ourselves a junkyard permit.

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  29. Wondering Mystery by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would be great if confirmed. The rover was programmed to move toward the lander station if I did not receive any commands for a certain period of time in order to improve its radio signal with the lander. But without a way to communicate with Earth (probably because the lander's batteries died and that rover relied on the lander for Earth contact), JPL had no way to know what the rover was doing during this time and if this emergency procedure was carried out. Now we may have an idea about how the rover did on its own. Perhaps it even built a clubhouse and spa during our absense :-)

    1. Re:Wondering Mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More important is the reason behind it going back closer to the lander

      "Mommy? Mommy? Are you okay, Mommy?"

  30. You're not dyslexic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you're just f*ckin' blind.

  31. RTG protesters by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    What a pity the anti-nuke crowd is so paranoid that we're forced to limit the exploration of Mars because their knee-jerk reactions to anything nuclear border on the hysterical.

    Do these people really make a difference? I remember hippies protesting over Cassini but that didn't stop the mission. Did NASA actually want to use RTGs on these Martian probes and get flamed into submission? If they did, then they're wussies.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:RTG protesters by yeahthisisrob · · Score: 1

      The next generation of rovers will use RTGs (if all goes as planned). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Science_Laborato ry

    2. Re:RTG protesters by cdipierr · · Score: 1

      No, these probes were never to have RTGs as they were part of the "better, faster, cheaper" initiative. RTGs are many things, but they're not cheap. Additionally, the sun is strong enough for solar to work well on Mars as they latest landers have shown. RTGs are better suited for deep space missions like Cassini where you'd never be able to use solar and batteries wouldn't have the lifespan in the harsh cold.

      That said, the Cassini protest got real press, even 60 Minutes did a piece. The main issue with it was that Cassini was using the Earth to slingshot its way to Saturn, and the anti-nuke wingnuts were concerned it'd crash during that maneuver.

  32. Michael Bay Strikes Again by jrmiller84 · · Score: 1

    Or was it... Megatron?!?!

    --
    I will forever be a student.
    1. Re:Michael Bay Strikes Again by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Megatron was a gun... this was a Toaster! Not a walkman, not a microscope, not a cassette, a Toaster!!! Could be some next generation Transformer I would guess... the question is if the symbol is of autobot or deceptacon?!? We'll need higher resolution images, ASAP!

    2. Re:Michael Bay Strikes Again by jrmiller84 · · Score: 1

      You'll have to rub the heat activated symbol on his chest to find out! (if you remember the old toys from a long time ago)

      --
      I will forever be a student.
  33. A Much Better Image by sasserstyl · · Score: 1

    I can't understand why Slashdot links to the New Scientist site when NASA is surely the best place to link to. Seems like a ploy for traffic by New Scientist to me.

    Anyway, there's a better image here.

    1. Re:A Much Better Image by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      *Much* better. But interesting to see how not even NASA folks can spell.

  34. Sagan Memorial Station by computersareevil · · Score: 1

    I thought the Mars Pathfinder lander had been renamed Sagan Memorial Station?

  35. FOUND IT! by ebonkyre · · Score: 1

    Although it looks like someone put decals all over it:

    http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?from=R40& satitle=big+trak

    --
    "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
  36. Mars is boring except for geologists ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but I still want to go there.

    It's got this immense benefit over the earth: no lawyers and no politicians. For now.

  37. How probes are located by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    MRO has only been on station a few months, since March. Imaging these four American landers were probably higher priorities than older Soviet landers.

    I believe the appearent bias is for technical reasons, such as newer radio tracking technology, and the fact that surface images are used to help find the landing sites. No Soviet probe ever returned a surface image.

    Somebody discovered that if they stretch the vertical scale of a Viking surface image, the distant hills were more easy to see. This allowed them to match them to orbiter photos of the general vacinity.

    The Sojourner landing set found two fairly large hills in the distance that were used to pinpoint their spot.

    The two current rovers also sent back images from about a mile high just before landing for the very purpose of finding them from orbit. (Technically the camera was on the outer appuratus, not the rovers themselves.)

    This is partly in response to the lost Polar Lander, which they are still looking for to gain clues to what went wrong. The fact that Polar Lander didn't send radio signals nor images is why it is still lost. Thus, Polar Lander is in the same boat as the Soviet landers and Beagle.

    It is not nationalism bias, at least not yet.

  38. NASA site doesn't show Sojourner by ToSeek · · Score: 1

    I haven't found anywhere on a NASA site that shows the purported Sojourner rover - only New Scientist and one other online news site do, so far.

    1. Re:NASA site doesn't show Sojourner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Sojourner's fate by ToSeek · · Score: 1

    In case of communications failure, the Sojourner rover was programmed to return to the lander and circle it. It's unlikely that it's kilometers away.

    1. Re:Sojourner's fate by Pooua · · Score: 1

      And, if we come back in a few months, will that little speck be in the same place, or is it endlessly circling Sojourner?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    2. Re:Sojourner's fate by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It depends on the programming. It could be cycling between "Explore until you get out of range" and "If out of range, return to Base". Of course, since the batteries are long since dead, it will only be doing this during the day, when there's enough light to run off of the solar panels. On the other hand, it could be just sitting there, waiting for instructions.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  40. More than meets the eye by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    What this photo doesn't show is the large army of killer robots just off frame.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  41. I Spy BIGGER picture by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article links to a downsized picture. If you really want in on the fun, download the 6.2 MB full size image from the MRO website.

    The Pathfinder lander itself is labeled MPF. It's about 2/3 of the way across the image (to the right) and perhaps 500 pixels from the top. It appears lighter than the surrounding material, roughly triangular in shape, and has a slight shadow to the right.

    I'm not sure which point they think is the adorable little Sojourner (pic of mockup next to Spirit and Odyssey on earth), but I think it's the two light grey pixels with a shadow about 15-20 pixels north of Pathfinder. That may just be one of the rocks it studied, though.

    The parachute and backshell are also labeled. The round object is the aerodynamic backshell that covered the top of the lander during entry. It is attached to the parachute, which is draped over the ground a few meters northeast.

    The think the heatshield fragments are pretty self-explanatory, although I'm unsure why it's so scattered. It must have broken up, probably tumbling, shortly after being released.

    The distribution of parts around the landscape makes some sense if you know how it landed. Pathfinder entered the Martian atmosphere at about 17,000 mph. It aerobraked using the heatshield down to about 900 mph. After two minutes, the parachute deployed and the heat shield was released. The lander was then lowered on a tether so it would be clear of the backshell. 8 seconds before touchdown, the airbags inflated and retrorockets fired. 2 seconds before touchdown, the tether was cut, with the retrorockets carrying the backshell safely away from the lander, and the Pathfinder bounced down onto its airbags.

    I think the Pathfinder payed for itself just in coolness (come on...airbags! Who thinks this stuff up?). Add science and engineering lessons learned, and this mission is priceless.

  42. Gremlins by evilviper · · Score: 1
    it's possible Sojourner simply took off on its own.

    Now that's just incredibly cool... A rover with self motivation.

    I can't wait for the next news story that Sojourner is driving around Mars, stealing parts off other rovers to repair and improve itself...

    We may have the first Mars ghost story.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  43. It's great that Stimpy's in the picture by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

    I love that they named one of the rocks Stimpy. Though it leave me wondering where Commander Hoek is...perhaps he got the.....SPACE MADNESS!

  44. Toaster size?? by deggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The pathfinder rover is 63cm long. How many toasters are 63cm long? Come on Slashdot. If you're going to make a comparison, at least ensure it is apt.

    1. Re:Toaster size?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary says "toaster over". 63 cm is about 2 feet, well within toaster-oven range.

  45. not a spacecraft... by dosle · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's not a sojourner, it's a SCHOONER!

  46. They should just send me! by psybre · · Score: 1

    I'll look for it!
    ~psybre

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor. -- d474
  47. took off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now, not to be a dick, but how could it take off on its own, it is tethered there - not even the wind can drag it away ;-)

  48. Robot Chicken says.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a magical world, Hobbes old buddy. Let's go exploring"

    Mars is amazing! Mars is amazing!

  49. More to the point... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... what's that horseshoe-shaped arrangement of little rounded dome-like things in the picture in the article? Look about 1/4 of the way down, 1/3 of the way across.

  50. All good Rovers go to Silicon Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry they all go to Silicon Heaven!

    What?? No such thing as Silicon Heaven??
    Where would all the calculators go?

  51. Come on, finish it by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

    Small Probe and Big Probe fly into an upper atmo bar.
    The ex-NASA bartender says, "What'll it be, boys?"
    Small Probe responds "I'll have a Pint of ale, please."
    Big Probe says, "I'll have a Liter of ale, please."
    The ex-NASA bartender just gives them a Quart of ale each, which they drink and then leave.

    Small Probe crashes his ride and dies in a pool of his own vomit. Big Probe lands safely, a bit pissed that he got ripped off on his drink, but later ends up in therapy since he blames himself for Small Probe's death in letting him drive. The ex-NASA bartender is fired for giving out free product, is convicted of "criminal negligence resulting in death" in a Martian court, and is sentenced to 7-10 years in the Phobos Mining Prison. Both Big Probe and the ex-NASA bartender are financially decimated after being named in and losing the wrongful death lawsuit brought by Small Probe's family. Ironically, Big Probe develops a drinking problem and now blames the ex-NASA bartender for all his problems. In a drunken rage, he corners the ex-NASA bartender in a filthy bar toilet stall and beats him to death with a titanium pipe. Before swallowing two bottles of sleeping pills and dying himself, his final hate-filled thoughts are directed toward himself and the JPL.

    Remember, unit conversion always matters!

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  52. from an helpful AC: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  53. 3KM? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Are we sure it's not 3cm, or 3mi? How about 3"?

  54. Too Little, Too Late by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I thought the Mars Pathfinder lander had been renamed Sagan Memorial Station?

    It was. But the name "Pathfinder" is what is stuck in people's minds.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!