Slashdot Mirror


MySpace to Offer Spyware for Parents

mrspin writes "Following continuing pressure from politicians (and parts of the media), MySpace is planning to offer parents the chance to download software which will monitor aspects of their children's activities on the social networking site. From a business point of view, the move appears to be a highly risky one. The young users of social networking sites are notorious for their lack of loyalty — and history suggests that a change like this could tempt many to abandon MySpace for the 'next cool thing'."

56 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. As I said to my wife... by bhsx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife and I just demanded the myspace password for my step-daughter's account (she's 12). I kick myself for not paying any attention to that damned site, because of it's sheer obnoxiousness and ugly designs. If I had paid attention I'd have a better feel for all the "ins-and-outs" of the stupid site. I was glad to see this information brought up on the local news here; but like I said to my wife:
    The kids will just go someplace else.
    So who wants to fund the next "myspace killer" with me? :P

    --
    put the what in the where?
    1. Re:As I said to my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      People under the age of 13 are not allowed to sign up for an account on myspace. His daughter must have lied about her age in order to get an account in the first place.

    2. Re:As I said to my wife... by bhsx · · Score: 4, Informative

      She's 12 years old. I thought it was the parents responsibility to monitor what there kids are doing online. Isn't that right? Sure, we can just view her myspace page and take it for granted that we're seeing everything. I was just glad to see that she had actually listened to us and not given-up any identifying information.
      As I already said, I don't know the ins-and-outs of myspace; but I sure as hell know what's going on if we have her password.
      Label me whatever you want, but she has no right to use my computer, network, or home(for that matter) in ways that her mother and I don't see fit.
      Even better that it didn't take my threatening to install a key-logger for her to cough-up the password(because I certainly would have, it's my system, she's a child).

      --
      put the what in the where?
    3. Re:As I said to my wife... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're better off just talking to her.
      Otherwise, you'll find out too late that
      1. the account you have a password to isn't her only account
      2. the monitoring software you installed was bypassed by a LINUX LIVE CD or usb drive
      3. she's using a friend's computer
      4. she's safe from online predators, but not her 13 year old boyfriend living down the block.
      5. etc.,etc.,etc.

    4. Re:As I said to my wife... by Mike89 · · Score: 3, Funny
      the monitoring software you installed was bypassed by a LINUX LIVE CD
      Damn those 12 year old female Linux fanatics!
    5. Re:As I said to my wife... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She's 12 now. In a year or two, she'll be 14, and well on her way to adulthood. I agree with the others here: talk to her. She isn't a little girl any more, so it's time to take a less authoritative stance - how else will she learn to function as an adult?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:As I said to my wife... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think more likely than not, your real intentions at the time were to take the opportunity to establish authority over her, while simultaneously making a show for your wife.
      Dude, she's *12*, not 18. He is absolutely correct to assert his authority over her actions in order to protect her. If he didn't do that then he'd be guilty of being an absentee parent letting his computer babysit his kids.
      or just keeping them to her cellphone and txts. 99% of all trouble kids get in to involves the cellphone that their parents ironically gave them to keep them out of trouble.
      Again, she's *12*. How many 12 year olds do you know with cell phones? Maybe I'm out of touch, but I didn't get a cell phone until I was 19 and that was because my car was such a piece of shit that I was sick of being stranded on the side of the highway when it broke down that I went and bought one myself. That was only 12 years ago.. I doubt the situations have changed much where suddenly all the kids have a cell phone now. Cell phones are for super-elite rich kids.
    7. Re:As I said to my wife... by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congratulations, you truly are out of touch as you worried. You honestly thought the cell-phone situation in 2007 is the same as 1995? They're incredibly cheap now and within even the poorest family's budget ($0 for a phone with a family plan). Lots of kids of all ages in all sorts of countries and socioeconomic statuses do indeed have them, with varying degrees of restrictions. Some phones will only call three or four pre-programmed numbers (Home, Mom's cell, 911, Grandma) which I think is a great idea for younger kids, for example if they need to call for a ride if soccer practice gets out early, or whatever. Giving a full-featured Blackberry with an unlimited txt & data plan to a 10-year-old is of course a completely retarded idea.

    8. Re:As I said to my wife... by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that if something happened to his daughter (as a direct result of meeting someone on Myspace) you might be one of the ones saying "Why wasn't he monitoring his daughter's online activity?" Unfortunately you don't have to look to hard to find plenty of examples of sexual predators using social networking sites to find their next victim, and it seems to me to that he's living up to his parental responsibility by monitoring who she is interacting with.

  2. So much for that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not your space anymore, son.

  3. Children are innovative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Children are innovative. Even if they don't move to different social networking sites, they'll find some way around this spyware.

    I'm sure the developers of this software spent much time during their youth trying to hide and protect their ill-obtained, yet sacred, copies of Hustler, Penthouse and Playboy. Just as they succeeded then, the youth of today will no doubt succeed in protecting the Web activities they hold sacred.

    1. Re:Children are innovative. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Funny

      You assume Myspace users are smart enough to realie it's been installed.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Children are innovative. by donaldm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At some stage (normally when the child gets into their teens) the parent has to start letting go and relaxing their supervision (this is called trust). It is very important for a parent to talk to their child and as the child gets older the dialog must become more meaningful so that greater trust when given is something a child can look forward to earning.

      Children are curious and will always try to see how far they can go before they overstep their boundaries. As parent it is up to you to define those boundaries with out being too restrictive although this can be a very difficult thing. Again this is were dialog comes in. It is normally a "cop out" on the parent's part to blindly agree with so called "well meaning" people who state that they are protecting their child's freedom because children are always going to do the wrong thing. Too many parents are willing to put their child's moral upbringing in the hands of people who probably have no idea of how to bring up a child themselves.

      I have mainly trivialised this but common sense must prevail between parent and child and a parent must be willing (even if it is embarrassing) to discuss everything especially sex with their child, otherwise the child will find out anyway and usually from their peers who don't know that much or who have distorted view.

      Hence if a parent does not know when asked a question by their child then the onus is on them to find out and come out with the correct answer that is not clouded by prejudice even though the parent may not like it because of their upbringing. If you as a parent can handle this you may actually learn something as well.

      I don't mean to say that bringing up a child is easy, it is not, but meaningful dialog can go along way.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re:Children are innovative. by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My Bulletin Space

      From | Date | Bulletin

      Jim | Today | FOOL YOUR PARENTS! MYSPACE SPYWARE REMOVER!


      Social networking at its best, would be the method to defeat this.

      Of course, chances are really good that every bulletin like that would just link to a porn site, a pyramid scheme, a myspace layout site, or, ironically enough, more spyware.
      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    4. Re:Children are innovative. by aplusjimages · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not only are kids innovative, so are sexual predators. how long until they find a way to use this spyware to monitor their favorite kiddies?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    5. Re:Children are innovative. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At some stage (normally when the child gets into their teens) the parent has to start letting go and relaxing their supervision (this is called trust). It is very important for a parent to talk to their child and as the child gets older the dialog must become more meaningful so that greater trust when given is something a child can look forward to earning.

      That's very nice. I'm sure they'll have no problem monitoring their kids online activities when they lose the house and internet access because they get fired because everyone complains about how they "only" work 40 hours a week so they can be a good parent.

      Because that's what I hear a lot on /. when there's talk of people with kids in the workplace. I'm afraid you can't be a good parent AND work like you don't have kids.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  4. HA HA HA by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought that MS was the only company that could so effortlessly shoot themselves in the feet. Parental monitoring should pretty much put an end to much of the MySpace userbase.

    Interestingly, if parents can do this with some software, is the government already doing it for them, but just not telling? I have to wonder about any company that will offer to 'spy' on you or your kids. I'm sort of interested in finding out how they will know that it is a parent of the account holder they are willing to spy on? Does the software have to be installed on the same computer as the child uses? That would only last about a week before its cracked.... expect YouTube videos on how to disable it within the week.

    1. Re:HA HA HA by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I almost forgot; queue the spammers with links to software download sites to allow you to monitor your children's activities. Nothing like a legit reason to download a keylogger... sheesh I can see it now. The next big virus will come disguised as a child protection monitoring software from https://d0wnl0ads.myspace.com/protect.cgi

  5. Parental Paranoia by jorghis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because your kids dont want you to know every single detail of their life doesnt mean that they are hooking up with 35 year olds. People take this business of monitoring their kids internet use too seriously. Would you tap your teenagers phone calls? If not whats the difference?

    1. Re:Parental Paranoia by cdrdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Would you tap your teenagers phone calls?" My parents sure would have. My sister has caught them looking through saved iChat logs (iChat can be set to save all of your conversations). I routinely use a who command in terminal if I have it open to see who's looking at what I'm doing.

      --
      This sig is neither interesting, nor humorous. Including meta-humor.
    2. Re:Parental Paranoia by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you tap your teenagers phone calls?

      I don't have to. Like any good parent I smothered my daughter in bubble wrap and then crated her. Nice and safe. Nothing's too good for my princess. She can come out when she's 21. If I think she's mature enough.

      Oh, wait, shit, she's 26 now.

      Hoooooooney? Where's the crowbar? And what's that smell?

      KFG

    3. Re:Parental Paranoia by glwtta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would you tap your teenagers phone calls? If not whats the difference?

      Most parents can safely assume their kids are only talking to people they personally know? Not really advocating one side or the other here, just saying - it's a real difference; there are others, too.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Parental Paranoia by snarkth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Trust.

    5. Re:Parental Paranoia by pipatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A vast majority of the sexual crimes against children are from people they know.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    6. Re:Parental Paranoia by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But verify.

      --
      I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
  6. What's that sound? by sporkme · · Score: 5, Funny
    NFTFA:
    An source which requested to remain anonymous stated that the new feature was to be entitled Myspace DeathKnell and stated that the board of directors was optimistic about the future of the social networking giant. "The future is bright. Much like the Titanic, this ship is unsinkable. The difference is that there is not a single iceberg in sight," stated another unnamed source.

    With any luck, this will be the third-to-last /. article about MySpace.
  7. Armageddon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My GOD, it's DOOMSDAY. Myspace users will begin to leave myspace and begin to infect the rest of the internet. KILL ME NOW!

    1. Re:Armageddon by HAKdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just leaving some slashdot luv! Holla!

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
  8. How will they verify it's the real parents? by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if this move doesn't drive away the kids, if nogoodniks are able to pretend to be parents and monitor the activities of other peoples' kids, this is going to be a nightmare.

    Perhaps I am dull witted tonight, but I can't imagine how they can make this spyware foolproof.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  9. Well designed, ill reciecved by zokrath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to the article, the software only shows what name, age, and location the user is claiming. It does not provide any other information.

    This is a well thought-out solution, as it provides the important information while still providing privacy to the user.

    Unfortunately, for many teens any information is too much to share, and many parents think that any privacy is too much to allow.

    1. Re:Well designed, ill reciecved by Hanners1979 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't know the name, age or location of your own child, then you have more important things to worry about that their MySpace account! ;)

    2. Re:Well designed, ill reciecved by mikek3332002 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IT isn't open source, so how do you know whether the software does traditional spyware activies as well.

  10. Solution to crappy parenting? by PoitNarf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Better software!

    --

    "0101100101? It's just jibberish. *looks in mirror, gasps* 1010011010@!? AHHHHHH!!"
    1. Re:Solution to crappy parenting? by glwtta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, that's a nice knee-jerk reaction there, but better parenting potentially involve having some idea of what your kid is up to with these things, no?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Solution to crappy parenting? by dk.r*nger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right!
      I've invented a perfect device for this purpose:
      The KitchenTable(tm) (patent pending)

      You install this device in a commons area of your home, and then one day you sit your kid down at the table and ass him or her, "OK, (name), I would never spy on you, but I keep hearing so much about MySpace and predators. Would you please walk me through the site and show me what it's all about? That would really make me more comfortable." (conversation NOT included).
      This will in most cases cause the child to agree, and show the parent around the site (Warning: child/parent bonding may occur). If the tactic fails, the KitchenTable (tm) may be returned for a full refund, reddemable towards the purchase of The Dungeon (tm).

    3. Re:Solution to crappy parenting? by Jzor · · Score: 2

      You could also keep the KitchenTable (tm) and purchase this small upgrade: ThePaddle (tm). Nothing like a 3"x18" of wood to teach the little bastard some respect.

      Although, now-a-days this would probably lead to DHS taking custody and the state handign out child abuse charges. :-\

  11. Too Technical? by elwin_windleaf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, let's disregard whether parents would/should need a piece of software to help them watch their children.

    More importantly, how are these parents going to install and use this software? I would say that the majority children are more tech-savvy than their parents, and aren't likely to willingly help their parents peer into their private life.

    So, how are parents going to install and configure a piece of software that will require user names and other information they might need to ask their children for anyways? What's to stop a child from setting up a dummy account to render the software useless?

  12. Useless by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parents who install the monitoring software on their home computers would be able to find out what name, age and location their children are using to represent themselves on MySpace. The software doesn't enable parents to read their child's e-mail or see the child's profile page

    So it tells the parents the exact same information they would get by searching for their kids name, email, or username on myspace. Even the private/hidden profiles that I've seen still show username, age and location. How is downloading some proprietary software to get publicly available information useful?

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  13. Seriously... by thief_inc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I say this as a parent. If US citizens do not have a right to privacy from corporations, why should a 13 year olds have a right to privacy from their parents?

    --
    "To Err is Human To Forgive is Divine neither of which is Marine Corp Policy"-My SNCOIC
  14. Just a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    but kids will be thrilled since they now can monitor their parents' behaviour on myspace.

    1. Re:Just a thought... by Zabu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You may think this is funny... one of my friend's mothers is lists herself as a swinger and posts pictures of her nasty tatooed body all over her page.
      I thought it was funny until she started messaging me.

      --
      It's all good.
  15. Re:Maybe I'm just wierd by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sure seems everyone else is gun ho for it.

    I seem to see it as:
    Everyone's all for spying, until they're the ones being spied on.
  16. Responsible by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people's attitude about things like this change drastically after they actually have kids of their own to be responsible for.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Responsible by RvLeshrac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or perhaps the people commenting on what a stupid idea this is actually... you know... do some parenting?

      I know plenty of people who see no reason to monitor their children. If you can't trust your kids, perhaps it is time to take another look at how you've raised them.

      --
      This signature does not exist. It has never existed. It is all a figment of your imagination.
    2. Re:Responsible by gillbates · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't a *bad* kid, but that doesn't my parents had reason to trust me completely. I pushed the limits, and I suppose my children will do the same. In fact, I've got a two year old who is doing that right now. Reason does not apply to the mind of a child, unfortunately.

      Kids push the limits because they haven't yet learned that limits exist. It's kind of like running into the street without looking. You and I can figure out that just because you do it once and didn't get hurt doesn't mean it's safe. But kids often don't know any better; they don't have the benefit of experience that we do.

      Granted, they'll learn, one way or another. One way of learning - that is, teaching your children, doesn't leave emotional (and sometimes physical) scars. The other way - experience - can be rather painful and have lasting negative effects. Imagine if children had to learn not to play in the street by experience.

      MySpace is not much different. Children don't understand adults; if they've been raised in a loving family, they might not understand why anyone would want to hurt them. They don't have the experience and judgement necessary to recognized the telltale signs that someone might have ulterior motives (could a 12 year old even spell ulterior?)

      I don't think there's anything wrong with giving children a little leeway to experience the world. They do need exposure to things outside the immediate family for proper development. However, parents have a duty to provide the oversight necessary to keep their children from getting hurt. While the MySpace solution is simplistic, I think that's what this whole thing is all about. Maybe you can trust your kids. Or, maybe you're just naive.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    3. Re:Responsible by RvLeshrac · · Score: 2, Informative

      It isn't being "naive" to trust your children. If you can't trust them, then you can't trust your own parenting.

      At some point, you're going to let your kids out into the world. You can't spy on them 24-hours a day, and you can't spy on them once they've moved out/gone on to college/gone on with the rest of their lives. You need to build up trust both ways, so that you'll generally know that they are staying out of trouble, and so that they'll let you know if they ever need help or have done something stupid.

      The problem is that most people don't seem to understand the difference between "parenting" and "threatening." A friend of mine, 16, in high school years ago, went to a party once. He drank way, way too much, showed up at home, and passed out in the hallway. His parents checked on him and turned him over on his side when they found him later, but left him there. The next morning, they sat him down (with his blistering headache) and told him that they didn't mind his drinking until he couldn't stand, but that he should probably take a hint from the fact that he woke up in the hallway in a pile of his own vomit, feeling like his head was going to split open and spawn a greek goddess. The gist of the talk was that he needed to learn from his own lessons, and that they might not be there next time to keep him from swallowing his tongue.

      They understood that punishing him for it was probably just going to make him rebel and do it again. They also understood that they couldn't watch him 24/7. He understood, from his pounding headache and the embarrasing situation in which he was placed, that he should probably not drink, or at the very least slow down - a lot. From that point forward, he was a lot more conservative in what he did for fun, and was more often than not a designated driver.

      They also took this time to tell him that if he did something this stupid (underage drinking, drinking-and-driving, or whatever else) and was arrested for it, they'd bail him out once, and only once. He DID do something a few years later, and spent a night in jail for it. When we asked him why he didn't call them to come get him, he said that he knew he shouldn't have done it, was willing to take the punishment, and didn't want to waste his "get-out-of-jail-free card" on something that he knew he shouldn't have done in the first place.

      You can argue the legality of a 16-year-old drinking enough hunch punch to cause alcohol poisoning all day long, but there's wisdom here. You can educate your kids and punish them all you like, but they'll still do dumb things. Sometimes they just have to learn from experience. The trick is what and where that experience is.

      Instead of spying on them, ask questions. Instead of threatening to punish them for future acts, simply punish them when it is appropriate, and explain why. Instead of telling them never to use or filing lawsuits against , email them news clippings about these incidents, or get them to pay attention to the news and point out that picking up strangers on social networking sites is no different from picking up hitchhikers on the side of the highway.

      Most importantly, don't be there to bail them out every single time they get into trouble. Teach them that they have to take responsibility for their own actions, and that you can't be there every time they make a poor decision. If you're there for them every single time they do something bad, they're just going to grow up thinking that you're always going to be there to "rescue" them, and that they are free to do whatever they want with no lasting consequences.

      --
      This signature does not exist. It has never existed. It is all a figment of your imagination.
  17. Mistrust will not help your children at all.... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As parents, the only thing you can do is try to be as trustworthy as possible. If you have reasonable success, your children may actually heed your warnings or at least realize when they are in trouble anc come to you for advice. You cannot get more. Monitoring, threats, harsh limits, etc... will just cause your children to leave home when they can and think bach of you as cretins (and rightfully so!).

    An essential component of this is to trust your children. Sure, they will do stupid things, but hey, they are children and still learning. And if they know they can talk to you they may actually come to ask for advice. Don't bbe shocked or appalled, just try to do the best you can. And if you don't know, say so. And if you are uncomfotable with some of your childrens choices, tell them that, but also let them make their choices.

    Eventually it boild down to respect. Respect your children. If you do that, then there is no way in hell that you can spy on them, which in my and very likely in your children's eyes is the ultimate sugn of disrespect.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  18. You overlook one thing by davmoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    history suggests that a change like this could tempt many to abandon MySpace for the 'next cool thing'

    And history also suggests that parents are quick to file lawsuits, juries are quick to side with the parents, and legislators are quick to pass new restrictive laws. Those trump what kids might do.

    Myspace already gets held accountable for a very high degree of parental stupidity. They are merely trying to cover their own asses.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  19. Re:Shibboleth by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ha! I've got a roommate!

  20. Re:Many wont do anything by Vskye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Things wont change that much, because most parents don't use that type software. Those that do, don't know how to use it, or don't feel they need to monitor their children. Typical Window's users.

    As a parent, and a Linux user at home and Windows user I'd agree to a certain point. My kids want to use/see certain sites that I just don't agree with. My house, I pay the bills for internet, end of frickin story. I don't actually block sites, but I let them know which ones they should avoid.

    Another thing, WTF are you grouping this as a "Typical Windows User"? Moron.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  21. I expect I'll be modded as a troll for this by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thus, I have no sympathy for kids who resent being spied on by their parents... it's their parent's property, they have every right to know every detail of how it is used. If they don't like their parents spying on them on the parents' computer then they should just not use their parents' computer... and find alternative methods of keeping in touch with their buddies that the parents won't be able to monitor because it's outside their jurisdiction.

    And if parents don't like that kids will inevitably find such methods, tough. They should have thought of that before they had kids in the first place if they can't deal with the fact that their kid might be more ingenious than they are. Ideally, you teach them the whole time they are young how to make smart choices so that by the time they are making their own possibly life-altering decisions they will do the right thing... then spying on your kids would just be superfluous.

    1. Re:I expect I'll be modded as a troll for this by bky1701 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you know the concept of a "boss button"? Rather trivial to hide what you are doing... and at the very least you can close a window quite fast without any special setup.

      And how would you like it if someone sat down at your computer any time they wanted to see what you are doing? What do you expect your kids to do when they move out? They will rebel against your overbearing spying, thus destroying any reason you may have done it in the first place. Kind of like telling a 3 year old not to stick his hand on the stove: he will just want to do it more, where the best method maybe to let him, or at least feel the heat coming off of it...

      People they expect kids to magically "grow up" at the 18/21 point make me sad. If they have never HAD to grow up, or more, never were allowed to see the outcome of their actions, what makes you think 18 is different than 12? Better make those mistakes while there is someone (ie, you) for them to fall back on than hope it all works out afterwards. An analogy would be not testing a new jet engine because it may blow up and just put it on jets and hope it works.

  22. Re:Maybe I'm just wierd by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Everyone's all for spying, until they're the ones being spied on.

    It seems to me that most people who advocate covert spying are also the same people that push the mantra of, "If you have nothing to hide then why should you care?"
  23. Re:Maybe I'm just wierd by jimicus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yet those same people give me funny looks when I ask them what their salary is and why they're wearing clothes.

  24. I am a bad parent by erica_ann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess we are just bad parents. Although we had talked to our son till we were blue in the face about not posting personal information, our preteen son had an account on MySpace - well actually a couple - that I found through a search. The clincher was when started getting phone calls from girls from all over and started making up lies of how they got his number.

    Needless to say, his computer is not behind a squid proxy and is locked down to not going to any internet sites unless we approve and add them for homework reasons or other reasons... but we have to approve and add manually. This (for now) keeps the chat rooms, sites like this at bay. Although it does not keep the kid from going somewhere else and posting.. my theory is that while he is under our roof, he plays by my rules. He can like it or lump it.

    It is like video games.. I play them with him, I see what computer and console games he is playing, and if I deem one inappropriate, it doesn't get played. Sure, I let him play Quake, Unreal, Rainbow6.. I have no problem with those games and such like that.. and I realize he can play stuff at friends. But, I am still the parent, and I control what goes on in my home. It is that simple.

    Others will probably post what an awful parent I am and how kid is going to retaliate this or that.. but so be it.

  25. Re:Maybe I'm just wierd by takeya · · Score: 2, Funny

    The best I've come up with in response to that mantra has been "I have plenty to hide - deep, dark, disturbing secrets that you would be shocked to know. That's why I'm being so careful about hiding them" followed by a wink and a grin.