Slashdot Mirror


Where Does Google's Hardware Go to Die?

An anonymous reader asks: "I was talking with a co-worker today about how Google is so big, and how they make such great use of commodity hardware to do their business, and one of the topics that came up is what Google does with its old hardware. Google has been around for many years now, they have more machines than any sane person would own, and they are continually expanding. At some stage they have to push out old equipment, either when it starts entering into its MTBF limits or it's been depreciated down. Searching (using Google of course) wasn't particularly fruitful. Has anyone seen where Google's hardware goes when it dies?"

123 comments

  1. Duh by TodMinuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    /dev/null

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    1. Re:Duh by nazsco · · Score: 1

      On a talk gave by Craig Nevill-Manning here in brazil, he bragged about changing >1000 ups modules on their servers daily.

  2. If it ain't broke, why fix it? by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm guessing that if its actually *DEAD*, they throw it out [read: some lucky employee gets a dead server to putz with], otherwise they probably keep using it in some form or another.

    1. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by Clazzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've got a good point there, especially if you think about hard drive space with Gmail. I'm sure Google will keep hold of their hard drives wherever possible to give them more space/more redundancy.

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    2. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, they leave it in the rack and mark it offline. Only when a large number of servers are history do they bother taking out the trash. That's the glory of well-managed commodity hardware!

    3. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Google's servers aren't actually servers. They use "Desktop" parts,. strapped to a rack shelf with cable ties.

    4. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You've got a good point there, especially if you think about hard drive space with Gmail. I'm sure Google will keep hold of their hard drives wherever possible to give them more space/more redundancy.

      The way hard drives have been getting cheaper and more compact, that doesn't always make economic sense. At some point the cost of storage, cooling, electricity, maintenance, etc. is too much and you're better off using that new machine that can handle 100 times the data for the same overhead costs.

      If electricity, rent, air conditioners, and sysadmins were free...

    5. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Older systems can connect to newer hard drives. I don't know how much hard drives figure into this though, I think RAM size is a bigger factor so the computer knows where the data is without wasting too much time looking for it.

    6. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 0

      I remember about 3 or 4 years ago reading how they are always putting in so many computers and that they had so many all racked up that it would have been more effort than it was worth to locate and replace the dead ones so they just leave them on the racks, because it works out cheaper.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    7. Re:If it ain't broke, why fix it? by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not clear to me that they discontinue using a lot of hardware.

      Just about 1 year ago, I heard from someone in the know that they were still running tons of Pentium Pro servers, simply because they delivered a slight edge in terms of performance-per-watt over servers with more modern processors. I imagine that surprising anachronism is largely due to the fact that a lot of what they do is I/O-bound rather than CPU-bound. Don't know if they're still using those...

      I would guess that Google *does* sometimes throw out hardware en masse, simply because it's too much of a pain to maintain extremely heterogeneous hardware configurations.

  3. Silicon Heaven by Xhris · · Score: 1

    Well at least once its dead...

    1. Re:Silicon Heaven by ezzzD55J · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's no such place as silicon heaven! You don't get little calculators with wings playing harps .. etc

    2. Re:Silicon Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      aww smeg, Cat get Kryten out of here before he blows another head... (im gonna kill you Rimmer!)

    3. Re:Silicon Heaven by Caffeinate · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course there is. In fact, all the calculators are female and they fly upside-down with the number "58008" on their screens.

      --
      Godless heathen.
    4. Re:Silicon Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Graphing calculators get more features I assume?

    5. Re:Silicon Heaven by flanktwo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen toasters with wings though... I wonder if they were running Java?

    6. Re:Silicon Heaven by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

      never seen a toaster with wings but ive seen a ruby on rails.

    7. Re:Silicon Heaven by jack_csk · · Score: 1
  4. Well, surely not Hades! by Merkwurdigeliebe · · Score: 1

    As most reckon that Google does no evil!

    Short of that, I dunno, maybe they go to Valhalla, heofan, paradisum, or they join a heap of rubbish in China.

    1. Re:Well, surely not Hades! by Parsec · · Score: 1
  5. Obvious by blowdart · · Score: 4, Funny
    Windows Live Search.

    Seriously I'm sure it would depend on what dies. A disk drive would get thrown and replaced, a motherboard frying is more serious (but of course you can rescue the memory and media). The nice thing about scaling out rather than up is that as newer hardware comes along you don't need to replace the old stuff; so why through something out unless it's dead beyond recovery, in which case it's useless to anyone and off to the recycler it goes.

    1. Re:Obvious by pipatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because sooner or later (with computers: mostly sooner), a new computer will do the work much faster than 10 old computers, saving a lot of money on energy, rent, support and cooling. Even if they actually work, it makes more sense to replace N older computers with one new.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    2. Re:Obvious by PipOC · · Score: 1

      This probably won't happen until 64-bit software gets more acceptance, because the memory density of google's current hardware is already maxed at 4 GB to a 32-bit machine. 64-bit machines can adress a whole lot more memory, which they'll need to if they move from 400 mhz machines to 2 GHZ machines.

    3. Re:Obvious by pipatron · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure google codes most of their really memory-intense software on their own.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    4. Re:Obvious by BadERA · · Score: 1

      but what does that matter if the limitation is imposed by the underlying architecture, not the software?

      --
      I am, therefore you think.
    5. Re:Obvious by hawg2k · · Score: 1

      While, that is inevitable, at some point, haven't we already covered here on /. that google still feels the pentium II is the best CPU power per watt, and therefore continues to cluster PII's?

      If this is true, then I would say that's counter to your "mostly sooner" point.

  6. donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When companies are so big such as Google they can't simply throw away their equipment. Probably they're donating the working hardware to schools or communities. Donations are tax deductible in the US, so they're actually saving money while getting free positive publicity.
    As for the broken machines, there are companies that make money off getting old hardware from businesses and recycling raw materials, so I think Google is doing the same. Here in europe there are high fines if you're caught throwing polluting stuff (electronic device are filled with polluting materials) without disposing of them properly, and I don't think in the US the law is very different from here.

    1. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 4, Informative
      Probably they're donating the working hardware to schools or communities. Donations are tax deductible in the US, so they're actually saving money while getting free positive publicity.

      Actually, donations of depreciated property are not really deductible, because your deduction is limited to your basis. If the equipment is old, it's already depreciated and has no basis. See http://www.msk.com/csl_files/325861.pdf.

    2. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by doj8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > If the equipment is old, it's already depreciated and has no basis.

      The only computer equipment which is old enough to be depreciated at Google would have had to have been purchased prior to 2001, since computer equipment has a 5 year depreciation schedule. As effective computer lifespans are considered three years among many IT folk, I doubt that a lot of the equipment is fully depreciated before it fails or is superceded by performance improvements. In which case, there is basis and the 21st Century Classrooms Act, signed into law as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-34, Title II B, Sec. 224) comes into play to amplify the tax deduction.

      Now, this is all assuming they capitalize the computers. While that would be how many businesses would treat them, Google might expense them. Google may well treat the computers as simply aggregates of spare parts.

      There seems to be an assumption that computers are not simply refurbished by replacing any failing components, or broken down for spare parts, discarding the failed components. The accounting complexities of doing such for computers under depreciation boggles my mind, but that's what computers are for.

      I doubt there are much in the way of failed "computers" at Google, but a lot of failed components. The components would typically be sent to a recycling firm, which either would be paid to take them away or would pay for the components if there was value to them.

      My company only deals with thousands of computers, however, once salvagable components are removed & failed components are sent to recovery, there is little left except empty cases. The plastic components of which are typically waste and the metal is sent to a metal scrap yard when there's enough.

      Since I can see little reason for Google to have cases per se (versus mounting brackets for raw components), I could easily imagine that Google doesn't have "computers" per se, but aggregates of motherboards, CPUs, RAM and storage. (If storage is shared, then not even that.)

      So, this whole discussion may be moot as Google may simply not have computers per se, just components.

      --
      -- Dan Jenkins, Rastech Inc.
    3. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      The only computer equipment which is old enough to be depreciated at Google would have had to have been purchased prior to 2001, since computer equipment has a 5 year depreciation schedule

      Good news -- my accountant recently told me that some computer equipment is now three years. Check with yours to make sure I wasn't imagining things.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    4. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by doj8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Good news -- my accountant recently told me that some computer equipment
      > is now three years. Check with yours to make sure I wasn't imagining things.

      That would be good news. As I am my own accountant (private, not public), I'll have to check the newer rules with the IRS. As of the latest version of the IRS publication 946 ("How to Depreciate":

      2. 5-year property.
      a. Automobiles, taxis, buses, and trucks.
      b. Computers and peripheral equipment.

      --
      -- Dan Jenkins, Rastech Inc.
    5. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Having once worked for an electronics recycling firm (which shall remain nameless), I can say at least SOME of the equipment is salvaged and resold overseas, what can't be sold, is processed for precious metals recovery. Very little of what gets to the recycler is donated, any donations would have to be made by the client (Google in this case) prior to shipment. On a side note, a little off-topic, refuse disposal in the US is largely left up to the states to administer, many of which tend to follow federal guidelines (refuse being defined by its contents). HOWEVER, there are states that define refuse on the basis of its point of origin, which creates a potential loophole for the unscrupulous to dispose of things that would otherwise be flagged as hazardous waste. E-waste tends to be the primary component of this "lost in limbo" material.

    6. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by dreddnott · · Score: 1

      You didn't work for trueCycle, did you?
      When I worked there we didn't do any international resale of salvaged/repaired electronics, but we did quite a bit of eBay sales in the United States. I can also confirm what you say about refuse defined by point of origin. We had that difficulty once or twice when differentiating California and out-of-state waste for state billing.

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
    7. Re:donations or environmental friendly scrapping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Donations are tax deductible in the US, so they're actually saving money while getting free positive publicity."

      oooookay. Where the HELL is this publicity? I mean, the whole point of the original post was that the poster couldn't find out what happens to the old hardware.

  7. And then by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most of the old hardware gets sold to MSN and Yahoo. Really old hardware gets sold to MS for use on .Net dev boxes. The newer stuff gets sold to MS for MSN search, but that's only if they have 640k of memory.

  8. We buy crap by Dion · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the words of a googler: We buy crap.

    I'm willing to bet that once the hardware is too crappy for Google, that it's completely useless for anyone remotely sane.

    Look for completely broken hardware at recycling places.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
    1. Re:We buy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet

      Don't say something like that here. I guess slashdot.org servers are running in USA. Next time you land on JFK, the feds will give you an orange suit and take you to Guantanamo to entertain Neteller execs.

    2. Re:We buy crap by timotten · · Score: 1

      I heard Google doesn't just buy crap... they buy custom-designed crap.

  9. Diversity in hardware by jurt1235 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Probably the most annoying issue they have with failing hardware, is new versions of the used components, causing incompatility with the old hardware components and the operating system. I imagine they try to keep it running as long as possible by shipping broken machines to a central location and use parts of those to keep the datacenters as coherent as possible. So a setup like one datacenter runs generation-5 years, 2 run generation-4years, 3 run current. This way you can at one moment decide to update a complete datacenter instead of hundreds of machines spread across several datacenters.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:Diversity in hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Probably the most annoying issue they have with failing hardware, is new versions of the used components, causing incompatility with the old hardware components and the operating system.


      Are you suggesting that their OS will fail to "Activate" if they fix the hardware a few times like Windows. :-)

  10. Have you tried asking google by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    as opposed to slashdot? One may have a clue, the other can make beowulf cluster jokes. Which do you prefer?

    1. Re:Have you tried asking google by Nanpa · · Score: 1

      Digg, where you can get horrendously bad, dirty jokes?

    2. Re:Have you tried asking google by Dmala · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, I happen to enjoy Beowulf cluster jokes...

    3. Re:Have you tried asking google by Reaperducer · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster jokes enjoy you.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    4. Re:Have you tried asking google by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Dmalas.... ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Have you tried asking google by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Heh, the way things are at work right now, I could use one.

  11. I've heard... by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    The guys from the Wayback Machine come round and archive it.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  12. I can't answer the question... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1, Funny

    but running an IT recycling company in the UK, you've just give a great idea! *g*

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  13. How about a computer equlivent of here: by ananamouse · · Score: 0
    1. Re:How about a computer equlivent of here: by Specialist2k · · Score: 1

      You mean something like the Computer History Museum in - surprise - Mountain View, CA? And yes, they exhibit Google hardware...

      http://www.computerhistory.org/

      Specialist

  14. Why should they throw it out by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, think about it. As long as it doesnt break down, the machine can still get search/indexing/crawling jobs, or take over part of the distributed storage network. Its already installed, its working, and even if its slower than the others, the system google is using doesnt really depend on individual machine speed.

    And after it broke down, they are going to dispose them, i guess.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Why should they throw it out by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      At some point, the cost of rackspace and power consumption will be out of proportion when compared to the performance of newer machines.
      I guess Google's Pentium 4 based machines (if they have some of those) will eventually lose out to Core2Duo and Athlon64 that way.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    2. Re:Why should they throw it out by catprog · · Score: 1

      I can't remember where it was but I heard there systems are Pentium 2's

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  15. Google who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but used is used. I don't know about you, but around here we have local recyclers.

    In fact, we've all been secretly buying used stuff from them for years.

    1. Re:Google who? by sakshale · · Score: 1

      I've get a lot of my stuff from Weird Stuff. I wouldn't be surprised to find something with a "goggle" property tag there... :)

      --
      For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
    2. Re:Google who? by fishyfool · · Score: 1

      Weirdstuff rocks. You might see anything, and I do mean anything in there.

      --
      Enjoy Every Sandwich
  16. Donating by dheera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it is an absolutely horrid thing of current American society that so many people always run after new stuff and never even bother to think about others when dumping old stuff. I've seen companies trash hundreds of computers (yes, actually trash them... because the HDD has sensitive data and because of taxes). I think that this should somehow be stopped. One way would be to heavily charge for the disposal of things containing lead, and remove all taxes for donations of educational supplies to needy institutions within the US or abroad.
    That way, companies can do a good zeroing of their hard drive and then send off the PC to an organization that will take it to Africa, India, China, or somewhere else with a shortage of computers. Seriously, kids in Africa who have never touched a computer before would really be able to make use of a lot of thrown-out pentium-1, 90mhz systems. It's not funny that US society just trashes this stuff. It's such a wasteful thing to do in this world.

    My supervisor (remaining unnamed) had a laboratory cleanup and hesitated throwing away anything - he almost put a cordless phone in the trash before I had to grab it out of his hands! The thing has lead in it, and for gods sake works! Some poor kid could use that thing in this world, and not everyone is as rich as he is to be throwing away a working phone! They also threw out this giant heavy "Communications Biophysics" plastic poster. I had to yank that out of facilities because it is recyclable. (Welcome to MIT. I wish people recycled more and thought about the world a little more here before they ran around inventing stuff.)

    1. Re:Donating by thelost · · Score: 4, Interesting

      donating sounds like a great idea, till you ask a computer charity about the associated costs. I worked for a place called Computers for Africa, which as you can guess shipped old computers over to africa for schools etc. We also would give refurbished systems to anyone who came and asked. We often had local charities and similar coming.

      The problem is that recycling a computer is EXPENSIVE. Shipping an old computer, specially with CRT monitors costs a lot of money. Also, people don't want to take these old clunkers off you, so you end up collecting more and more pentium II 200mhz toasters which you then have to find some way to get rid off. It's not a profitable business. Now of course people will chime in, why doesn't the gov recycle them for plastics etc? Well recycling printers/monitors is really hard to do. It's very expensive and not worth a computer charities time on the whole, if they don't want to go under from the associated cost.

      All in all, we (the west) produce so much computer waste that we can't keep track of it or keep ahead of the game. With the amount of people owning a PC sky rocketing, expect to see a whole lot of sad looking computer corpses being crushed at your local dumps.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    2. Re:Donating by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Removal and physical destruction of the hard drive is the only fool-proof way of ensuring that sensitive data is not disclosed to outsiders.

      Are you sure that some random third-world country actually wants our old computer hardware? Besides the costs of packaging and shipping, someone has to install new software and test each system. The computers will probably have reliability problems and may not be able to run the software that the recipient wants to run. Does the recipient have reliable AC power? Will the donated hardware run at the local AC voltage/frequency? Is there a program in place to train people how to use the computers? What about unintended consequences, like disrupting the existing supply chain?

      You would be better off recycling the hardware and making a cash donation to a reputable aid/development group.

      Lead toxicity is greatly overrated.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Donating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.camara.ie/
      I've started volunteering with them recently. It's scary the stuff that companies in post-Celtic-Tiger Ireland throw out. The Irish Times (National Newspaper) recently moved their offices, leaving the charity to gorge themselves on the computers left over. Among the spoils were:
        - G4 PowerMacs
        - 20'' + screens (Both flatscreens and bigass CRT's)
        - Servers
        - Projectors
      As well as 142 odd Pentium 3's or thereabouts.
      All that would have been thrown out otherwise...

    4. Re:Donating by supabeast! · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I think it is an absolutely horrid thing of current American society...


      Well, as soon as you find the billions of dollars it would take to clean all of this old hardware up, package it, transport it to and American port, ship it to an African port, transport it to a new site in Africa, unpack it, set it up, and actually teach people how to use it, you should be able to convince all these horrible American businesses to do so. Don't forget about finding power and offices/data centers to use the computers in--after all, they aren't going to last long in dirty third-world hovels. And you'll also need to find food for all of the people you expect to use the computers, because most of those poor Africans are going to be subsistence farmers or war/AIDS orphans who need to spend their days trying to eat, not learning to use Windows 98 on old Pentium boxes.
    5. Re:Donating by cananian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Um, he-LLO? MIT is the king of recycling. It's the home of the "reuse" list, where you can find someone to take almost *anything*. We've got student groups dedicated to rescuing ancient macs, dozens of dorm rooms filled with obsolete lab equipment, etc, etc. At MIT you really only have to put your unwanted stuff outside your door with a "reuse" sign on it and it will be snatched up. If you do this and post to the reuse mailing list, then it'll be gone within minutes. And not just electronic stuff: people regularly post food, event tickets, etc, etc, to reuse. It's magic, and a big part of MIT culture. I have to assume that you are new here (and your advisor, too). Learn a bit about MIT culture (especially undergraduate culture) before you are so quick to judge.

      --
      [ /. is too noisy already -- who needs a .sig? ]
    6. Re:Donating by djlemma · · Score: 1

      Back in my Carnegie Mellon days, any old hardware that had outlived its usefulness would get put out in the hallways for students to pilfer. "Hallway Rule" they called it.. It was well known enough that in the instances where things had to be stored in the hallway that were NOT meant to be given away, professors would put numerous signs saying "NOT TRASH- DO NOT REMOVE" on them.
      So, the moral is, Google simply needs to find a sufficient hallway.

    7. Re:Donating by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      I think it is an absolutely horrid thing of current American society that so many people always run after new stuff and never even bother to think about others when dumping old stuff. I've seen companies trash hundreds of computers (yes, actually trash them... because the HDD has sensitive data and because of taxes).

      It's often been my experience that, with computers, things old enough to be thrown away by one user are too old for other users to want.

      For example, I stripped the good hard drive out of one of my old computers to use as a portable drive - but now I have a 200MHz computer with only a 4Gb hard disk. Sure, it works, but it's so old no-one would want to pay the shipping to get it from me.

      I've got plenty of junk in a similar condition. What does one do with a 15-inch CRT? A 4x CD-ROM drive? A parallel port handheld scaner? A parallel port webcam? A 33.6kbps dial-up modem? A parallel port zip drive? A well-used PS/2 keyboard?

      Nobody wants this stuff. It's as simple as that. That's how it seems to me, anyway.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    8. Re:Donating by b1scuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here Timbatwe, Google sent you a computer! Let's plug it in to the... oh.

    9. Re:Donating by middlemen · · Score: 1

      you can make a good firewall with the 200MHz system by using a minimal installation of Linux or best OpenBSD. Add an extra ethernet card and it can be your router and you won't have to buy a Linksys/DLINK stuff. you can use this as a web server as well simultaneously. That way if you like to use Windows you will be more secure than earlier.
      You can add a good gaming card that is supported on your PC, install Linux and play games like FlightGear which need basic CPU but a good GPU.
      If you are an electronics freak, then use the system to program microcontrollers and other things. You can that way use your paralllel port scanners etc. dismantle them, and reuse their equipment and reprogram them as you want. Of course, all this is just for hobby sake.
      If CRT works, donate it. otherwise attach a KVM to it, and use for multiple machines. Or if you like Windows and like games, then get a Dual video out card and connect to play games on two screens etc. etc.
      Lots of things can be done with old equipment as long as you are willing to do it. You can make a security system in your own house, by using webcams and collecting simultaneous video output like they show in movies.
      Depends on how much itching you have in your balls regarding all this . If it itches, scratch the itch.

    10. Re:Donating by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      I just got the mental image of Mind of Mencia when Mencia "sends" a N64 to a Honduran kid.

      All was said was "Screw You Mencia".

      --
    11. Re:Donating by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Actually, 1 true random should make data unrecoverable by just about all means.

      You do not have to install software on them. You could just give them Linux CDs for them to install themselves, with a nice instruction manual.

    12. Re:Donating by gronofer · · Score: 1
      I think it is an absolutely horrid thing of current American society that so many people always run after new stuff and never even bother to think about others when dumping old stuff.
      Not always, e.g., freecycle.org seems to have originated in the USA.
    13. Re:Donating by hasbeard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just disposed of the first computer I ever bought. It was an HP Pavilion 7955 with a 1.5G Pentium 4, 768 meg memory, and a 40GB hard drive. I bought it at the end of 2001 I think when Windows XP first came out. A Google search helped me find a good home for it. I gave it to a project called HandyCable Networks located in Greensboro, North Carolina (US). This group utilizes disabled people who refurbish the computers and give them to needy people. What they can't fix they strip of usable parts and recycle the rest. They have a special license from Microsoft that lets them install Windows on the refurbished computers. It seemed to me to be a "Win-Win" situation. I got rid of a computer I didn't want anymore. The people in the program gain skills by working on the computers. Somebody will get a decent computer. And the environment will benefit by keeping some more waste materials out of the landfill for at least a while longer. If you're in driving distance of Greensboro, NC (US) here is their site where you can find contact information if you have a donation: http://www.handycapable.org/ If you aren't close enough, a web search will probably find some other organizations who could use some of your old stuff.

    14. Re:Donating by dheera · · Score: 1

      Yes, I go to MIT. I'm all on top of reuse myself and live by it. Half the stuff in my room comes from reuse.

      For those of you who know MIT, I'm basically complaining that far too many people at MIT do NOT use reuse. Food goes to waste more often than it shows up on free-food, and computers get trashed more often than show up on reuse. I've found more free 17" LCD's that work (marked "trash" and left in a dumpster) than have ever shown up on reuse. This is the reality. People need to learn about reuse.

      Many supervisors complain that it's too much work, not worth it, and try to just trash things. I think it's an absolutely horrible thing to do, especially when so many students will flock to reuse PC's. Dealing with the rubbish pile left behind by reusers is not actually that difficult - you just tell reusers to take it in one piece or not at all.

      Not to mention that the Used Computer Factory at MIT, which assembles and gives PC's to needy people, could use those extra sticks of SDRAM and random other things. Throwing away 200mhz's is simply NOT an option.

      I mean, give me a break, my 300mhz PC from reuse has been running my website for 4 years now and has survived being slashdotted and dugg and other things. I even have 486's serving as picture frames. Supervisors around MIT often don't realize that students actually have use for this stuff and think a 486 is trash. If it has an LCD, it's not trash as far as I'm concerned - it's another digital picture frame for me!

      And really, more stuff gets marked "trash" than gets posted to reuse nowadays. It's sad, and I want to do something about it, but I don't know how. Many professors won't listen to me when I tell them about reuse. They just tell me "who would want *that*? why should I care? it's trash as far as I'm concerned..."

    15. Re:Donating by dheera · · Score: 1

      Good. I honestly respect you for doing that.

      Oh, and to the poster above who asked if 3rd world countries would want our PC's, the answer is YES. I know this myself, because I have been to those countries. They would be happy to get their hands on any such hardware. Software is a matter of time and learning, which they can handle. When the majority of 3rd world schools don't even have computers anywhere in the school, a simple donation of a 200Mhz PC goes very far. 200Mhz is seriously good enough to browse most useful and educational parts of the internet, and good enough to run a school website server for such countries. And the students, who have never touched a computer at home or anywhere else, would be glad to have it.

      Please don't trash your computers. There ARE organizations that will take your PC's. Even if you junk your hard drive for security reasons, or have non-working components, there are community service organizations (read: respectable computer-knowledgeable volunteers who are doing a great service) who need such parts. They do mix and match components and assemble computers. Please find your local organizations who do this and give your PC's to them. Please encourage your employers to do so (they can feel free to remove the hard drives, but please donate the rest). Do the world a service. We really don't need our junkyards filled with things that could be improving the world.

    16. Re:Donating by dheera · · Score: 1

      Oh, and not to mention, a 90Mhz system is PERFECTLY GOOD enough to learn basic Linux concepts, shell scripting, C, C++, Perl. There are millions of poor children in 3rd world countries dying to learn computer science. They don't need DirectX and 1 GB of RAM. Even the internet isn't prerequisite. They need ANYTHING that will run an interpreter or compiler.

      So please, consider this. Even old 486 laptops with no HDD and which will run a stupid Knoppix boot CD will serve the above purposes.

    17. Re:Donating by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      That response dusted off a few funny memories ... esp the cobol one from bash.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    18. Re:Donating by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      The problem is that recycling a computer is EXPENSIVE. Shipping an old computer, specially with CRT monitors costs a lot of money. Also, people don't want to take these old clunkers off you, so you end up collecting more and more pentium II 200mhz toasters which you then have to find some way to get rid off. It's not a profitable business. Now of course people will chime in, why doesn't the gov recycle them for plastics etc? Well recycling printers/monitors is really hard to do. It's very expensive and not worth a computer charities time on the whole, if they don't want to go under from the associated cost.

      Simple solution: require all hardware vendors to take back and recycle or properly dispose the products they sell. They will automatically start designing for ease of recycling instead of low cost. The cost of disposal will end up part of the original sale price, and the problem will solve itself.

      In almost every question of pollution the simplest and most appropriate solution is "the polluter pays for the cleanup". It's just common sense.

      Incidentally, this is the path the EU and Japan are following, with the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment directive in the EU, and the Law for Promotion of Effective Utilization of Resources in Japan.

    19. Re:Donating by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      A few issues:

      1. Donated items are already fully tax-deductible for their true value at time of donation. Granted, for a 4-year-old PC that is probably $50, and for something that doesn't work the value is probably even lower.

      2. If items are going to get donated it would probably be to a local charity like a thrift store - no shipping costs. But, that works great for a Mom and Pop company - not so much so for a major corporation like Google. I'm sure their local thrift store would tell them to buzz off after the junk collection fills 50% of the store (ie, after a week).

      3. Many companies outsource disposal of stuff like computers, office furniture, etc. Dovebid is a good example of such a company - you give them junk, they figure out what to do with it. The junk either gets donated, sold, or trashed as appropriate.

      4. As others have pointed out, most places that actually would have use for a "free" $50 PC, don't have the money to pay for the shipping. So, companies like Google would actually lose money to donate the PC, vs not spending anything to trash them. Even if you had recycling fees they might end up being cheaper than shipping to Africa. And if it wasn't you'd find a million "charities" accepting PCs in Africa, pocketing part of the shipping costs, and just dumping the PCs somewhere. Half of the shipping cost is probably getting the PC to some remote village, and how is anybody going to know whether it is happening?

    20. Re:Donating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Simple solution: require all hardware vendors to take back and recycle or properly dispose the products they sell.

      California has already started doing this.

    21. Re:Donating by KermodeBear · · Score: 1
      For a similar idea in your local area, check out FreeCycle. From the website:
      When you want to find a new home for something -- whether it's a chair, a fax machine, piano, or an old door -- you simply send an e-mail offering it to members of the local Freecycle group.

      Or, maybe you're looking to acquire something yourself. Simply respond to a member's offer, and you just might get it. After that, it's up to the giver to decide who receives the gift and to set up a pickup time for passing on the treasure.
      --
      Love sees no species.
    22. Re:Donating by cananian · · Score: 1

      At various times there have been poster campaigns to educate people about reuse. It sounds like you might be motivated to start another one. Ask around on the reuse related lists; I'd be surprised if there weren't poster pdfs already stashed away somewhere.

      --
      [ /. is too noisy already -- who needs a .sig? ]
    23. Re:Donating by bark · · Score: 1

      Lead toxicity is NOT overrated. You try having deformed babies with your wife.

      Have you seen those electronic dumpsites in China? Thats where the electronic wastes go after you chuck em in the garbage. One piece of equipment on its own is fairly insignificant in terms of toxicity, but in the amounts that the western world throws out, the concentration of heavy / toxic metals is alarming high.

      Statements like that are ignorant and calloused. How can you say that? Are you even human?

    24. Re:Donating by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Just about anything is toxic in sufficient quantities. Lead is a useful material. We shouldn't stop using it just because of people who become hysterical every time something is labeled toxic in the popular press. All I'm asking for is a little rational thought in policy making.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    25. Re:Donating by unitron · · Score: 1

      Email me at coastalnet.com about that handheld scanner.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    26. Re:Donating by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      "Have you seen those electronic dumpsites in China? Thats where the electronic wastes go after you chuck em in the garbage."

      Maybe if you chuck them in the trash in China.
      If you chuck them in the trash in the US they go to a US landfill (or maybe a Mexican landfill).
      I work for the semiconductor industry and you would not believe how anti old equipment China is. I have to fill out a mile of paperwork to ship a used tester there, and if it's defunct earlier then about 5 years I have to pay to ship it out of the country.

      I swear there would be a market for a "shipping" company who could loose a shipment on-demand. Just chuck it overboard in international waters and claim it must have slipped off it's pallet.

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  17. Donations not so Simple by Cassini2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to watch what you donate and give away to employees. You want to give away equipment that can still be maintained in a usable state. Once, I had to get rid of a bunch of obsolete monitors, and a group of employees were actively requesting them. Instead, I donated them to an Electrical Engineering professor at a local college. He tested each of them before doing anything with them. One caught on fire and caused a serious mess. Big problem! The Electrical Engineering professor was skilled (and ready) for this sort of thing, so it was okay in the end. If I gave these monitors to employees, their houses could have burned down!!!

    Lesson: If you give untrained employees or volunteer organizations equipment, make sure it works! Sure you can give the stuff away with a "no guarantees" label. However, your employees are still expecting "safe" equipment that reasonably works. Unless you are confident that you are giving away "good" kit, only send the equipment to trained professionals.

    1. Re:Donations not so Simple by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever heard of having someone sign a disclaimer? Sheesh...

      --
      +++OK ATH
  18. The developing world... by svunt · · Score: 1

    My brother-in-law is a buyer for a company here in Australia, which buys massive lots of older computers and parts to sell to India, Malaysia, etc - countries that need a lot of hardware for their growing number of call centres, etc, but can't afford current-generation equipment. There's a pretty big market for working older machines. I'd guess that Google would sell their old hardware to someone like that, or if they use equipment until it dies, they pay to have it recycled or scrapped as cleanly as possible.

  19. there are definiate limits to consider by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Older systems can connect to newer hard drives.

    for howe long, the timeline the GP indicates "you're better off using that new machine that can handle 100 times the data " is easily read as literal,

    an original XT with a 20 megabyte hard drive could also take a 40.. but it wasn't ever going to work with a multi-gigabyte drive.

    look backwards..
    if google had been supported by XT's, 1000's of them.. and then the next wave of hardware, 20 gigabyte hard drive. came out- or, sata, or sas, or usb....

    At the point when one machine can replace 10 older ones in terms of storage capacity and processor capability, I don't think you'd find the older system capable of running current 'then' spec hard drives.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:there are definiate limits to consider by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Cheapest solution at present is to equip your old hardware with an IDE or SATA controller card, and let the *card* handle the HDs that the existing motherboard can't see. More cost-effective than replacing a whole rack, when all that's needed to upgrade it is more HD space.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:there are definiate limits to consider by segin · · Score: 0

      This may be true, but... Consider this: Take a more "recent" model of the IBM PC line (let's say, an XT or AT), with a 16-bit ISA bus. Install the most modern ISA IDE controller available, and write some tricky 16-bit LBA-capable software, and you could probably pull off extabytes.

  20. I too would like to know ... by pbhj · · Score: 1

    I too would like to know ... where you can get an ex-google harddrive with inside details of the non-published alterations to their algorithms.

    Let me know.

    Thanks

  21. Hm.. by lejerdemayn · · Score: 1

    Well, I heard there are 2 guys doing their phd in a garage who ask google for their old hardware..

  22. Understatement by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    Google has been around for many years now, they have more machines than any sane person would own

    Well if that isn't the understatement of the day, I don't know what is...

    1. Re:Understatement by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      If I prove that I'm insane, can I build a nano-Googleplex in my basement with their old hardware?

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
  23. Put them on display in a museum by JoeCommodore · · Score: 5, Informative

    Like this early rackmounted array of Google servers which was displayed at the Vintage Computer Festival in 2005 and now is (I believe) on display at the Computer History Museum (which is worth the effort to tour if you are near the Palo Alto/Mountain View California Area.

    From my write-up about the rack: The rack in the picture holds 4 standard Pentium II Motherboards per level and has a total of 80 Linux (2.0) servers per rack. Since they were standard MBs they had to get creative with things such as wiring and insulation (which was, in this case, cork-board.) The panel shows the server room as well as talks about the fire dangers of doing such a design. (Google is a neighbor to the Computer History Museum BTW). (closeup)

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Put them on display in a museum by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too cool! Very, very creative. Spit and bailing wire blade servers! This is why I can't hate Google, they really are stone cold geeks who made good. Who else but a geek would build something like that!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    2. Re:Put them on display in a museum by trentfoley · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I toured google during summer 2006 while on vacation. An old high school friend is an employee, and my family got a private tour. I was able to examine one of these racks up close. I took this photo in the main lobby where we got our security badges. Here's some of the more interesting features:

      1) The motherboards are insulated from the rack by a sheet of cork board.
      2) The back of the rack is covered by an array of generic case fans all connected with zip-ties.
      3) They all used slot-1 pentium2 processors.

      I wasn't allowed to take pictures of the real stuff. Security is insanely paranoid. Even my children had to sign nda's to get their security passes.

      My kids were more impressed with the foosball tables, and the free food and drinks located just about everywhere.

    3. Re:Put them on display in a museum by YGingras · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, there are only 3 such racks on display: one in the Googleplex lobby, one in the Computer History Museum and one that is shipped to expositions here and there. Our balance is still off by several hundred racks... Where did the other ones go?

  24. machines done die, they just get rebuilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was fortunate enough to get a tour of the google campus once and i asked them about thier server and what they run, etc. One of the most surpising things i found out is that most of thier servers dont have cases. They do this so its super easy to swap out hardware if something dies and to perform any upgrade that may be needed. If a part dies, they can yank it out and replace it without even having to take the server out of the rack. The dead part simply get tossed in the trash and the server continues serving its merry a** off. To me that means thier servers never 'die', they just constanly get new parts and the parts that do die are so dead you wouldnt want them.

    1. Re:machines done die, they just get rebuilt by ziegast · · Score: 1

      I was fortunate enough to get a tour of the google campus once and i asked them about thier server and what they run, ... The dead part simply get tossed in the trash

      It must have been some time ago. Dumping electronics in the trash is now illegal in Santa Clara, California.

      If I had the buying power of Google, I would make my vendors replace and recycle any and all dead components for me at no cost to me. Forced recycling might also give vendors more incentive to make their components last longer.

      -ez

  25. Sale It by socerhed · · Score: 1

    Why cant they just sale it for a fraction of what they bought it? I mean really most people don't NEED the newest greatest thing. You can hire a couple of guys who sit in a warehouse all day just testing the hardware. Then you can either format the hard drives or replace them with $20 hard drives and sale them. You could even bundle like groups of 25 computers or monitors and sale them bulk to people or companies that can't afford all new hardware. Then if your good enough at it people will come back when those go bad or to "upgrade" in 2 to 3 years and by then you would have "new" hardware. Its not about making a profit but about cutting your losses.

    --
    LostHobo.com
    Soup Kitchen of the Internet
    1. Re:Sale It by doj8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is nothing to sell.

      This whole discussion is moot as Google simply does not have computers per se, just components. There are no cases, no monitors, just motherboards, CPUs, RAM and, maybe, storage. There's no reason for video, sound, peripherals either.

      All of the components would be run until they fail. They would be not usable at that point. Nor would they be counted as a "computer," only an aggregate of parts. The failed component would be replaced and the rest kept on working until some other component fails. Effectively the "computers" would be immortal, but the components would be perpetually replaced.

      --
      -- Dan Jenkins, Rastech Inc.
    2. Re:Sale It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The failed component would be replaced and the rest kept on working until some other component fails.

      Many stories have said Google doesn't bother to do this. It's too costly.

    3. Re:Sale It by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 4, Funny

      "CPUs, RAM and, maybe, storage. "

      Oh, I imagine there is at least some storage involved...
        Unless they cache the internet in ram

    4. Re:Sale It by vakuona · · Score: 1

      They apparently do. How do you think they serve you results so quickly. Because that stuff is all in RAM. Try searching for stuff on your own PC now. See how long it takes to get meaningful results. Now search on Google. They did not query a database on some HD there. The whole thing is in RAM.

    5. Re:Sale It by doj8 · · Score: 1

      I guess if the unit displayed any failure, it would be safer (and definitely quicker) to just replace the entire unit. I would have assumed they just put in a new unit and send the old one for repair, rather than discard the old unit.

      However, the numbers just don't make sense to my frugal soul (from one who does not have umpteen million servers to manage). :-) Since the systems don't have cases and don't even need to be pulled from the rack to service, I would think these components could be easily & economically replaced:

      A dead power supply seems pretty clear cut and would only require a few minutes to replace.

      Bad RAM is a fairly easy diagnostic and again trivial to replace.

      Any motherboard wierdness would justify pulling the unit, as it could be motherboard or CPU. (Presuming the RAM test showed nothing.)

      Again, I'm assuming shared network storage and no local storage.

      Of course, if the entire "computer" consists of the power supply, motherboard, CPU and RAM, there's not much there to repair. The power supply could simply be a connector off a larger power unit. So that leaves a motherboard/CPU pair and RAM. The former would be perhaps US$100 (depending on specs). The latter depends on size, but a 1GB-2GB would be US$100. (I'm assuming volume pricing, of course.)

      Assuming typical repair and testing time would be a $105 for an hour (salary plus benefits plus overhead), then, I guess it does make sense to just discard the entire station. The old station might even be worth a bit to their computer recycler and defray the cost differential further.

      I guess I'm persuaded now.

      --
      -- Dan Jenkins, Rastech Inc.
    6. Re:Sale It by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      "CPUs, RAM and, maybe, storage. "

      Oh, I imagine there is at least some storage involved...
          Unless they cache the internet in ram


      You joke, but this is Google....

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    7. Re:Sale It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all in L1 cache.

  26. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing Google, they probably just hand them off to a local electronics recycler.

    1. Re:Well... by dreddnott · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I used to work for a fairly large Southern California electronics recycling company, as a hardware testing, asset managing server admin with chicken feed for pay, and we had contracts with some fairly large companies, such as Viewsonic and Dreamworks. I got to see some *very* interesting stuff go through, from all computing eras. As an example, I rescued a Motorola 6800, their very first microprocessor, but I let an Intel 8008 slip by me (we had to work fast!). My company even destroyed a beat-up Dreamworks Silicon Graphics O2 that was named after the original Foonly (Google it!). Kind of depressing. This company has a facility in Placerville as well as SoCal and maybe Google is working with them.

      On a good day we could expect to completely shred or rehabilitate 20,000 pounds of electronics, the vast majority being CRT glass, with quite a bit of metal and plastics as well, so I suspect Google's output is not beyond a single company's capabilities. The company philosophy frowned on the idea of sending semi-obsolete equipment to third-world companies for a 'lease on life' as those companies are not really equipped for repair or disposal of dead electronics.

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
  27. in the back alley by juan2074 · · Score: 0

    In much the same way that you got rid of your old junk from college, young Google engineers stealthily bring the old hardware to university towns just after finals and leave the stuff with the discarded furniture.

    Frat boys eventually recycle everything into shims for pool tables or anchors for their parents' boats.

  28. you hit the nail on the head by r00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google has been transitioning to RAM-based storage. With redundant servers around the world, power outages are no problem. RAM is way faster; a disk can only do about 100 to 400 (commonly 200) seeks per second.

  29. What are you smoking? by Wee · · Score: 1
    And can I have some?

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  30. it doesn't die, it goes to a farm by sar · · Score: 1

    the hardware never dies, it just gets taken or runs away to a farm in the country like our dogs and cats when we were kids.

    --
    .
    1. Re:it doesn't die, it goes to a farm by Duds · · Score: 0, Troll

      We live on a farm. It got bloody crowded.

      I think we had your dog. He's dead now, sorry.

  31. Does Google already use recycled hardware?? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given their existing parts-swapping policies, and the level of hardware they're using, I'd guess Google doesn't buy much NEW hardware, but rather, probably buys motherboards etc. from the various e-waste recycling outfits -- which charge about 16 cents a pound for sorted motherboards, RAM, HDs, etc. if you buy it in bulk. It only takes one entry-level employee to test such stuff to the "does it power on and boot up? Good enough!" level that is all Google really needs, given their massively-redundant setup.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Obviously, you are new around here. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    about 5 years ago, it was reported that the downturn to the W. American Economy allowed Google to skip the harddrive and switch to pure ram. Combine that with linuxbios, and you have a fairly low cost energy system that is not likely to wear out quickly as it will not use huge amounts of energy. Afterwards, they simply sell or give away the motherboards.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Obviously, you are new around here. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Interesting concept, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_platform seems to contradict that.

      Ram is still rather expensive compared to hard drives for data which isn't accessed very often, even when the operating costs are factored in. Sure, much of Google's data *is* accessed often, but much of it *isn't* as well. Just think of all those emails in people's gmail accounts that sit in the inbox for years upon years.

  33. At Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...old hardware never dies. It remains forever in Google Cache.

  34. Look... by Bazman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet there's a big landfill site somewhere near Google HQ, but its probably really low resolution in Google Earth...

    B

  35. Just google it! by u19925 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In google search, type, "Where Does Google's Hardware Go to Die?" and click the "I'm feeling lucky" button. No, seriously, do it. You will get the right answer.

  36. Google "Commodity Hardware" is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Google is still using what most hobbyists think of as "commodity", then they aren't as smart as people like to think.

    I'm sure they're using some custom hardware designs by now. If they aren't, they're wasting a lot of time, energy, and manpower.

  37. Doesn't make sense economically by try_anything · · Score: 1

    Testing and shipping computers from the first world is more expensive than buying used computers locally. Third world countries do have demand for computers, and there are companies that meet that demand at very low cost.

    That explains why there are no groups soliciting donations in the US. It's better to recycle the computer and just give money to an NGO that buys computers on the local market.

  38. Haha, very funny by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

    ...next you'll be saying there's no such thing as Father Christmas and the Tooth Fairy.