Slashdot Mirror


Global Collaborative Music Experiment

hephaist0s writes "Last year, 165 bands completed the RPM Challenge: to record an original album (10 songs or 35 minutes) during the 28 days of February. The idea is to get musicians to set aside the barriers that stop them from working on their music and simply devote a month to getting it done. This year, more than 300 bands from around the world — including two groups from McMurdo station in Antarctica — have already signed up at www.rpmchallenge.com, and this time the organizers of the challenge have built into the site the ability for bands to share samples with each other. If a band chooses to upload a sample into the Sample Engine, then any other participating group can use it however they like. The possibilities for global collaboration are vast!"

80 comments

  1. Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

    Where's my copy of Audition.... Even if it sucks, it's incentive for me to produce the songs I've written, and have never, ever recorded....

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed, this is great. I don't have the resources to produce the kind of album I want to record, but I have a diverse collection of half-finished instrumental stuff bouncing around in my head. It's also a good excuse to finally get a portable MIDI keyboard.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I did a 28-minute Christmas album during the month of November last year, using nothing but 15+-year old keyboards and a thirty-day, fully-functional Adobe Audition demo (available from adobe.com).

      It's fun, you should try it.

      It came out pretty good, too!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Where's my copy of Audition....

      If you can't find it you might try Ardour.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome, if I had even one of the many programs needed to compile and run it...

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    5. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      They're all freely available on the internet. There's really no excuse not to.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1
      I don't know how to use any of them.


      I don't really have the free time to learn how to use any of them.

      That's a sizeable roadblock...

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    7. Re:Helloooooo, One Man Band! by NetHead026 · · Score: 1

      Amen. I'm a hobbyist musician (I play piano) and thought, "I think I might actually do this."

      I haven't recorded any of my major performances since 2004 back when I used MIDI and virtual instruments. Since getting access to a Yamaha C3 grand piano and some decent mics I haven't recorded as much on the virtual setup thinking, "I'll only record on the real thing--it sounds so much better."

      Listening to some of my old stuff, it wasn't that bad, even with the simulated instruments. This project would force me to record on the virtual setup and help me reevaluate the strengths and weaknesses of computer-generated music.

      That being said, good luck, bro. A project like this will only help make better musicians.

  2. This is an excellent idea... by gearmonger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...because everyone knows the REAL reason there's not as much high-quality music as there should be is that musicians spend way too much time trying to make it enjoyable and interesting.

    Yep...speeding up that process is without a doubt the best way to improve what bands few have ever heard of produce.

    -1 Cynical

    1. Re:This is an excellent idea... by ronabop · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Having recorded over 1000 hours on high end gear, I can definitely say that a vast amount of time is spent trying to get the "perfect" take.

      Sometimes time limits are good.

    2. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Negatyfus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you ever been in a band? One of the biggest problems you encounter (aside from getting along with each other musically as well as personally over an extended period of time) is excessive time spent on perfecting your material. Musicians are perfectionists. If it's not one song they continue to work on for much too long, it's a new song they started, neglecting the old one. Songs never get finished, because they're still too busy trying to work out the right way to transition from this part to that or aren't happy about one riff or another.

      The purpose of this project, and it seems to me like a great idea, is to motivate bands to have a definite time-line and a goal to pursue. When you are actually working towards something and are under pressure to finish it, when you have an actual end to your project in sight, then suddenly the band will pull together and work thrice as hard on it. Stuff gets done, and what do you know? It turns out that creativity doesn't need years upon years of perfecting.

    3. Re:This is an excellent idea... by wass · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I highly disagree (or I agree with your sarcasm). In my experience, as an amateur musician, many times when I or other band mates set out to write a song per se, things sometimes feel forced and it's hard to find that muse. But in my experience (and I'm highly curious of others reading this) some of the best songs in my and my band's repertoirs are ones that just "came out", from either screwing around and stumbling onto things that rock, to making fun of something that happened, etc. This also occurs with famous musicians, they need to release a filler track at the studio just to finish the album and sometimes the filler becomes a chart topper!


      Do you like garage rock, or even much rock from the 60's and 70's? Some common criticisms I've heard from popular musicians in those days compared with today's recording techniques is that things now are too controlled. Ie, back then you'd set up microphones, do some quick soundchecks, and play music. Today, with the high-tech audiophile equipment, you spend forever soundchecking and tweaking your parametric filters and pink-noise generators to get your ideal flat response curves. But - the complaint is that all the flat-response tweaking makes the sound kind of 'dull' and too 'studio', losing that gritty or grungy character of older rock n' roll.


      Finally, if you read the page, the point isn't to make your magnum opus this way, but to just get off your lazy urban-sprawl-induced fat ass and make some music. Have fun, you'll improve your chops, learn some things, and maybe possibly pull off a great tune that in the future you'll be glad you came up with.

      --

      make world, not war

    4. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_A_Song_Before_I_ Go for an example of what wass is talking about.

    5. Re:This is an excellent idea... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Could anybody please back this up with some example material of the previous RPM challenge, just to demonstrate how well this helps bands in reality?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:This is an excellent idea... by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Speaking as someone who has literally hundreds of tracks that have been banished to the Hell of Never Getting Finished, I agree this could be a great excuse to dig them all up and actually finish them.

    7. Re:This is an excellent idea... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back in the late 80's when production values just got silly, my friend's band were in the studio doing their next single. The producer had the singer do the entire song 60 times and he then went through the vocal tracks sylable by sylable dropping the preferred one down to the master vocal track. Crazy.
      That said, I understand that some well known and respected singers, still do this including one that is supposed to have one of the best voices around.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    8. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      That said, I understand that some well known and respected singers, still do this including one that is supposed to have one of the best voices around.
      These days, it's even easier. You can make even a crummy take into a good one by correcting/changing pitch, adjusting vibrato, changing the timing and speed, and adding all sorts of subtle effects. Of course, as with many modern audio engineering techniques, it's easy to overdo this and wind up with a too-perfect, cold sound. And I doubt it would work at all on singers with truly unique voices -- I'm thinking of Sarah Bettens (who isn't nearly as popular in the US as she should be), who does this beautiful voice-cracking thing I've never heard before.

      But if all you want is typical bland pop vocals, jeez, you don't need any singing ability to sound decent. Even I can do it ;-)
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    9. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Technician · · Score: 1

      Musicians are perfectionists.

      If that were true, Why they would not sign with labels that killed the quality and dynamic range out of their music?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gmex_4hreQ
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war

      To add insult to injury, iTunes finished the quality by encoding to only 128K and charging full bore retail. I suppose it is OK to listen to on a noisy school bus, but it is very lacking on good equipment at home.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    10. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      Well, possibly because these musicians want nothing more than a label that will pay for their recording cost for them. These guys are expensive, even though there are many affordable budget studios these days. You do get what you pay for, which is mostly the experience of the engineers. Furthermore, some people prefer over-compressed tracks. It also depends on the type of music you're playing. For example, a solid death metal track would probably benefit from extremely compressed voice and drum tracks. Only the big names that get trapped in slave contracts will have to bow to the label's wishes. And in that case, it's more a case of bad business decisions (or protecting your very livelihood) than anything else.

    11. Re:This is an excellent idea... by DkY · · Score: 1

      This sylable splicing is quite obvious on the Stone Roses first album, though in fairness Ian Browns voice has never been the best. It's particularly noticable on Waterfall on a good set of speakers, which was a bit of a shock to me the first time I heard it on decent equipment, it really breaks up the flow of the song.

      Great album though, just dont listen to it on good equipment.

    12. Re:This is an excellent idea... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      This challenge is similar to the 24 Hour Comic. This was a challenge issued many years ago by cartoonist Scott McCloud to one of his friends, who had a tendency to take days (at least) to finish a single page of art. The goal was to write and illustrate a 24-page comic book in just 24 hours, starting with 24 blank sheets of paper and ending with a finished story. (By comparsion, a typical issue of a DC or Marvel superhero comic takes 4 or 5 creators a whole month to produce.)

      It's a great exercise. (I've tried twice and succeeded once.) It forces you to set aside whatever's preventing you from getting things done, and create. Forget "I don't have time"; it's only one day. Forget the need to get everything "just right"; the deadline for each page is only an hour away. Just do it. The results are usually far from perfect; no one produces their "best" work like this, and that's not the point. It's an eye-opening exercise, showing the cartoonist what he can accomplish - and how efficiently - if he tries.

      In many ways it's like the punk rock ethos vs. the studio rock of the 70s, favoring raw energy, enthusiasm, and creative inspiration instead of the over-processing, second-guessing, and sterility of baking something for 12 months in a studio. And I know that I get more of a kick from the Ramones' End of the Century than from ELO's DiscoVery.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:This is an excellent idea... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Funny, I noticed it more on Don't Stop. ; )

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    14. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a big link right on their home page. Actually all pages.

      http://www.rpmchallenge.com/rpm_player.html

      Some of the songs are pretty good, some crap. Then again I think most of the 'hits' on the radio are crap, and many don't care for my taste. So what do I know?

    15. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      While I like some of the Stone Roses work, anything that distorted isn't worth playing on "good" equipment. Another band would be Social Distortion. Mid range consumer audio is about all you'd want to play that on, not least for fear of actually doing some damage to your speakers. They also don't compress well in MP3 format, although AAC seems to handle it quite well.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    16. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1
      Have you ever heard of NaNoWriMo?

      The goal here is not to produce another Tocatta, or Freebird, or Cowboys From Hell, but to get people who ordinarily woul not be producing an album to produce an album. It's motivational, it's inspirational, and it helps to get the creative juices flowing.

      Plus, it's fun. If you don't wanna do it, then by all means, go back to whatever it is you do when you're sarcastically commenting on things you don't understand.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    17. Re:This is an excellent idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having spent at least that much time recording on a variety of gear, I can definitely say that most of the time, the first take is the best one too. Still doesn't stop me from doing hundreds of takes though.

    18. Re:This is an excellent idea... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      The OP is right.

      I've *never* gotten anything finished (muscically-speaking) without a deadline.

      And the stuff that I've HAD a deadline for -- wow, some of it's not bad.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    19. Re:This is an excellent idea... by David+Greene · · Score: 1

      Back in the early days of jazz recording, it was not uncommon for bands or soloists to cut 4-5 sides in a session. Often those sessions would be only half a day.

      Commercial music production today has taken out the "human" quality of recordings, as exemplified by artists such as Fats Waller, Fletcher Henderson and their peers. The quality of the takes is phenomenal given that they only had two or three attempts. There was no editing equipment to patch over mistakes. The mistakes themselves sometimes prove to be the most interesting parts of the performance.

      I like the idea of getting back to simpler recordings that don't try to electronicize away all of the interesting stuff.

      --

    20. Re:This is an excellent idea... by David+Greene · · Score: 1
      But in my experience (and I'm highly curious of others reading this) some of the best songs in my and my band's repertoirs are ones that just "came out", from either screwing around and stumbling onto things that rock, to making fun of something that happened, etc.

      Right on. Deadlines really help too. Last fall we were planning a public meeting for the community organizing group I work with. I told the planning team I was going to compose a choir piece for the event. I had a month to do it and had never written anything for a full choir before.

      I took some time kicking melodies around in my head. I knew the basic style I wanted (up-tempo gospel swing) and the chord structure (based on the standard "When the Saints Go Marching In") but melody has always been a challenge for me.

      It turns out that I composed the melody one Saturday morning in about 30 minutes, including lyrics. It was completely different from everything that had been going through my head earlier. I even changed up and went to the blues for the verses, which worked great with the "Saints" chorus. I just convinced myself to get it done that morning. By the end of the afternoon I had the choir arrangement finished. It turned out very nicely though unfortunately the recording equipment at the actual event was subpar so the live take sounds worse than something recorded on a Gramophone. But it was great live and in person.

      So yes, I absolutely believe that this kind of thing can motivate musicians to create great things. I might have even participated in it myself to get a demo CD I've been wanting to do out the door but I can't afford a good preamp at the moment.

      --

  3. .rpm Only!? by DevelopersDevelopers · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, were they too lazy to make .debs? Some of us use frickin' Ubuntu, you insensitive clods!

    What? Oh, never mind...

    1. Re:.rpm Only!? by ozbird · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, Gentoo users make their own music.

    2. Re:.rpm Only!? by indifferent+children · · Score: 3, Funny
      Heh, Gentoo users make their own music.

      And lots of compilation CDs.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  4. This IS an excellent idea by Bitter+and+Cynical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should consider the idea that it's less about improving the quality of music or producing hits and more about breaking down cultural barriers and sharing diversity.

  5. Like NaNoWriMo by Form-o-Stuff · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kindof like National Novel Writing Month (november). http://www.nanowrimo.org/ And Channel 101 (5 minute videos monthly) http://www.channel-101.com/ The internet's becoming a seasonal support group for artists lacking impetus. Now if only there was a way for these independent producers to make money off their labor...

    1. Re:Like NaNoWriMo by Rei · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if such contests tended to produce quality work, they'd be more useful. And I say this as a NaNoer. It achieves more "cheerleading" than "helping produce good works," as it tends to rush people toward a very tight deadline. Not to mention, 50k words is really more of a novella. I must give credit where credit is due, however: the realism forum is a great place for research.

      --
      "I need swat, tactical, the guys with the flashlights on their guns, those guys with the big shield thingies"
    2. Re:Like NaNoWriMo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also like the Seven Day Roguelike Challenge.

    3. Re:Like NaNoWriMo by koogydelbbog · · Score: 1

      NaNoWriMo also span off a NaSoAlMo a couple of years ago which is pretty similar. (SoAl = Solo Album).

      http://www.lacunae.com/nasoalmo/

  6. RPM is pretty much the same as FAWM.org by RumGunner · · Score: 3, Informative

    February Album Writing Month > RPM. RPM is about recording, whereas FAWM is about actually writing quality material, much like NaNoWriMo.org. Since FAWM encourages their participants to record and upload their songs at the same time, I don't really see the point of RPM.

    1. Re:RPM is pretty much the same as FAWM.org by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      FAWM is about actually writing quality material, much like NaNoWriMo.org

      Lolz. You've obviously never done wrimo, or even hung out on their boards. Sure, there's some "quality material" but there's a whole lot more desperation to make it to 50K by any means necessary. :)

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  7. Shouldn't be too hard .. by torpor · · Score: 2
    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Shouldn't be too hard .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think we are your pals? ;)

    2. Re:Shouldn't be too hard .. by torpor · · Score: 2

      Dong, I know you don't like 'formalizatin' anything, but you can't deny me the right to call anyone writing music for our wedding a pal..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Shouldn't be too hard .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule 1: You do not talk about the 'dong'
      Rule 2: You DO NOT talk about the 'dong' on your wedding night. :)

  8. South Park already did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read the headline "Global Collaborative Music Experiment" and immediately think "Worldwide Recorder Concert" ?

    "The brown noise! Kenny and me found the brown noise! Here, look! Look. [places some earmuffs on Stan's head] There, okay. Let's see here. [places some earmuffs on Kyle and rushes back to his side of the room] Right there. Okay. Okay. Ready, Kenny?"

  9. Hrmmph, submission grousing. by t0qer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I submitted this a looong time ago....

    Justin Frankel, you know, wrote winamp? Sold Winamp? Well, he wrote this program called Ninjam that allows folks to collaborate music in psuedo real time.

    http://www.ninjam.com/

    He also wrote a DAW (digital audio workstation) called reaper.

    http://www.reaper.fm/

    as well as a programable software DSP called Jesusonic

    http://www.jesusonic.com/

    This all started circa 2004 or so. Justin has set up some public Ninjam servers, and everything played on these servers is released under the Creative Commons License...

    http://autosong.ninjam.com/

    Point being, I probably submitted this quite a few times over the years. Don't understand why slashdot would ignore a story about someone who pretty much revolutionized how we listen to music. Time for slash to get new editors again.

    1. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by lawnsprinkler · · Score: 0

      Don't understand why slashdot would ignore a story about someone who pretty much revolutionized how we listen to music. Time for slash to get new editors again.
      It's because they're not as smart as you.

      Mod +1 Insightful.
    2. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the streams I'm listening to from http://autosong.ninjam.com/ sound like pants, so that might be part of the reason why. A great idea, but a sampling of the results is underwhelming.

    3. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      You know, your post has SFA to do with TFA other than they are both about music.

      Maybe /. needs new readers, instead of a wah-wah cry babies?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    4. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      Dude. Digg is just eight characters away. Have fun!

      -=g

    5. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Point being, I probably submitted this quite a few times over the years.
      None of the programs you talk about are open source. My guess if that if you don't pander to the open source and linux crowd here then you don't get your stories posted.
    6. Re:Hrmmph, submission grousing. by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Late reply, late enough I won't get downmodded for calling you a dumb ass.

      The article was about a global music collaboration project. My post was that Justin has been doin this work since 2004. Though it might not be open source, Justin has traditionally released his shareware with..

      A reasonable price tag.
      B No time limit on the trial period
      C Fully uncrippled trial, all features enabled.

      He did it with winamp, and he's carrying that same style with these new products. I think someone releasing software the way he does is really great, unlike all the other products out there who's trials make the software stop working after 30 days, or only lets you record to low bittrate audio. Remember Cool Edit? You'd open it up, and they'd only let you use 3 features of the software at a time during the trial. Kinda lame.

      Maybe that's the problem.. You don't have a lameness detector. sux2bu.

  10. industry by polar+red · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IMHO a larger problem than making the music is getting it to the public. What with the music-industry not liking non-mass-produced originally-sounding material, they just keep that kind of music OFF the air, and pushing the next boys-band or the next Britney Spears.

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a problem I'd love to see solved. See: indiradio. It's still in closed beta, but it should be open soon enough, for any independent artists to post their music.

  11. Don't forget the audio interface! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When you get your MIDI keyboard (E-mu Xboard is pretty nice for what it costs), don't forget a soundcard that supports ASIO, otherwise you'll hit a key and wait a second for the softsynth to kick in with sound.

  12. What RPM stands for by Cow+Jones · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you were wondering (like me) what RPM stands for in this context, it's "Record Production Month" (says so in the last paragraph on the linked page).

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    1. Re:What RPM stands for by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      And the youngsters in the audience might be interested to know that RPM used to stand for "rotations per minute". See, back in the 20th century, when music was encoded in analog form on pressed vinyl, the signal was engineered to be played back at one of three standard speeds: 78rpm, 45rpm, and 33+1/3rpm. Using the slowest speed, it was possible to fit over 20 minutes of music on one side of a 12-inch disk! (And you had to turn the disk over to access the data on the other side.)

      :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:What RPM stands for by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      RPM used to stand for "rotations per minute".
      Actually it was "revolutions per minute" (in the UK at least).
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. two groups from McMurdo station in Antarctica... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

    lets skip those, they probably only did Iced Earth covers anyway.

  14. Axiom. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    The M-audio Axiom is very nice if you prefer a semi-weighted keyboard. It's loaded with data sliders, knobs, buttons and pads, all of which have a nice feel. Big display. It's more sturdily built than the usual M-audio plastique.

    The AC upstairs isn't kidding about ASIO, either. But really? Unless you're really serious about keeping a clean OS installation and not be running lots of goodies, you're going to have problems with the USB sound modules, unless you don't mind clicks and crackles in your music (I happen to like them, but that's the kind of hairpin I am). That means no running Google Toolbar Notifier when you're recording.

    This RPM Challenge is a terrific idea. Nothing kills more creativity than procrastination and fear. Not even heroin or a job.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Axiom. by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      The AC upstairs just decided to finally register after 3+ years of lurking and being an AC ;).

      An alternative would be http://www.asio4all.com/ - which can get the latency for regular soundcards down. But then you're usually still stuck with the cheap noisy outputs of on-board soundcards and no fancy inputs - in case you'd record guitars or vocals, having a box with preamp you can stick a microphone in is a very nice thing to have.

      The Axiom is neat indeed - looks very luxurious. Add to the controller the fact that you can get hundreds of softsynths for free on http://www.kvraudio.com/get.php/ and you can get going. On the other hand, few things are as lethal as a folder full of plugins and no idea on how to work with 'm. Anyway.

      I personally find it a great and incredible development that, provided that you have a computer and an internet connection you can set up an entire music making environment on a whim. While detractors will say that it'll be crap, I don't think Sturgeon's Law is going to change (as in 90% of everything is crud) - it just means that the 10% that -is- innovative/quality/good will get bigger.

    2. Re:Axiom. by mpathetiq · · Score: 1

      I can attest to the goodness that is ASIO4ALL. It makes my SigmaTel C-Major almost perfect. My latencies were cut to about 10% of their prior time.

  15. 14 Days of Art by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the "14 Days of Art" sponsored by the alt.design.graphics newsgroup for the last five or six years. During January of each year, participants would have to make one work of art per day, in any medium, and post it online for viewing by the rest of the group. Some of the results are schlock, but others are just breathtaking. There have been photographers, painters, printmakers, oragami artists, multimedia designers, etc... Google it, there's some good stuff to be seen.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  16. kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is 35 minutes a complete album? That won't even fill up an LP!

    1. Re:kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Since when is 35 minutes a complete album? That won't even fill up an LP!

      I own several albums that are 30-35 minutes long. Yes, they are on vinyl!

  17. Nothing makes good music like ... by thedbp · · Score: 0

    Nothing makes good music like artificial deadlines and random user-submitted samples of irrelevant chord progressions.

    Can't wait to hear all the craptastic whiny love songs and pseudo-rebellious angst-rock.

    I gotta stop reading and posting at slashdot within 10 minutes of waking up. Cuz i'm a crabby bastard.

  18. A matter of style by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    The time needed to record an album depends a lot on the style of music you make. It takes me an hour to make ten seconds of electronic music. (If you must, search for Rene Kita on Archive.org.)

    Time spent by Derek Bailey, the great master of free improvisation, in recording a one hour record:
    One hour and one minute, if you count setting up and turning the recorder on and off.

  19. 28 days? That's nothing. by gregtron · · Score: 1

    A friend and I recorded some 18 tracks in one night. Each song got one take, a lot of improv, and was fueled by at least one pre-song beer. And for something that sounded like less-than-literate version of the Mountain Goats, it wasn't bad. I still listen to it from time to time to remember days when I could stay up all night and drink and play guitar.

    So 28 days should be nothing, even for a full band, to record 10 tracks.

  20. RPM is a lot of fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this last year and it was really a lot of fun (and pressure). The point isn't for the best of the best to write the best, but for all of us to get off our ass and have a good challenge and do something we wouldn't otherwise do. I learned from it, had fun and am doing it again this year. I will probably NEVER put out a CD that someone will buy, but many people like myself don't really care about that. Just having an outside reason to create the album is enough to get me moving.

    Also check out the profiles of many of the bands listed. They are often doing that [fun|alternative|solo|instrumental|etc] CD they would have never done otherwise.

    I encourage others to sign up and give it a shot. Talk to others that are signed up and give each other some support. Share your thoughts and why your intimidated. Become a better musician for it.

  21. DMCA by zefrer · · Score: 1

    Isn't sharing original work with others(with no fee or record contract or w/e) illegal under the DMCA?

  22. Need to do a prog rock version by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Then it's ONE song or 35 minutes. :)

    Hey, I tease. I'm a long time prog rock fan.

  23. Good example of quick studio work by geobeck · · Score: 1

    This probably goes way back before the time of most Slashdotters, but in 1977, David Lee Roth, Eddie and Alex van Halen, and Mark Anthony walked into a studio, played 11 tracks with minimal re-takes, and walked out the same day. The result was one of the most influential albums in hard rock history.

    Many people will dispute which of the band's many albums was its "magnum opus", but no one would discard Van Halen as a shaky, half-assed first attempt. Then again, I have no idea how much time they spent polishing their tracks in the garage beforehand.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  24. How is anyone going to listen to all that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    35 minutes per band, more than 300 bands. More details please.

  25. Global collaborations by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

    If you want to collaborate with musicians from different genres from the entire globe, you can do that any month at MusMakers. But I'll make sure we get onto the spanking-musicians-in-February-train too ;)

  26. Exchanging large music files over the internet by gigajohn · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty cool idea...lots of bands collaborate over great distances to get their music out.

    I happen to know of an easy (and free) solution that has become very popular with musicians these days. GigaTribe http://www.gigatribe.com/ lets users exchange huge music files (and entire folders of music files). And it's all done within a small private network (like a band), so no one can intercept the encrypted exchanges. There's also a chat window in there, so musicians can explain stuff to each other in real-time.

    This, and cheap new recording techniques are making it easier for musicians to collaborate and get their music heard!

  27. Right. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Wonderful collaboration technology used for dubious purpose.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  28. MOD PARENT UP by JoostSchuttelaar · · Score: 1

    Great tracks ;)

  29. That's what Jonathan Coulton did by DirkK · · Score: 1

    That's what Jonathan Coulton did, and he did it right. A Thing a Week puts stress on you, but you are forced to get it done. Then again, you can hear that he has lots of experience and did his homework. Oh - and has talent.

  30. We did this last year, good times.. by scottbot · · Score: 1

    Yeah, check it out, we're the Naughty-Five... http://www.rpmchallenge.com/rpm_player.html?band=T heNaughtyFive/

    1. Re:We did this last year, good times.. by scottbot · · Score: 1