Slashdot Mirror


65% of Americans Spend More Time With Their PC Than SO

Ant writes "PR Newswire reports that 65 percent of consumers are spending more time with a computer than with their significant other (SO). The "Cyber Stress" study confirmed consumers' growing relationship with technology in their everyday lives. In fact, more than 8 out of 10 Americans (84%) say they are more dependent on their home computer now than they were just three years ago."

48 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Techno-Dystopia by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    “We empathize with consumers about the emotional nature of dealing with computer problems. As the leader in computer problem resolution for nearly 10 years, we have a distinct advantage in helping consumers quickly and conveniently solve their frustrating computer problems,” said Josh Pickus, CEO of SupportSoft.

    SupportSoft sells support; so they're interested in a dystopian state of affairs. (For my part, I'm still not convinced we're not dealing with a slashvertisement.)

    That said, computers play some yet-to-be-determined role in the splintering of society; as the space-time-continuum is warped, and proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.

    A real dystopia, therefore, might be the flattening of human relationships into one indifferent, indistinguishable mass.

    But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

    1. Re:Techno-Dystopia by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

      Several European countries have birthrates acceptably above the replacement rate (hello from Finland). The real problem with Europe's birthrate is not that they may lead to extinction of ethnic majorities (a possibility in some countries, not all), but that government services cannot be adequately maintained without enough of a growth in population.

    2. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.

      Right, I will make sure to email you when I'm sick and need groceries, or to look after my kid when I need to go out a bit.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    3. Re:Techno-Dystopia by inviolet · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Several European countries have birthrates acceptably above the replacement rate (hello from Finland). The real problem with Europe's birthrate is not that they may lead to extinction of ethnic majorities (a possibility in some countries, not all), but that government services cannot be adequately maintained without enough of a growth in population.

      Interesting... because in an earlier slashdot article we read this:

      Roughly speaking, a Ponzi scheme is one in which the perpetrators make false claims in order to lure investors. Once they have some investors coming in, they begin to pay back the earliest investors in order to create hype and garner more investors. People make money in ponzi schemes, but only by being at the top of the pyramid. What separates a Ponzi scheme from an actual market is that in an actual market, the items being traded have value outside of the system itself, and that access to liquidity is therefore available at levels other than the top. The article claims that because cash exchanges and the corresponding exchange rates are controlled by the people at the 'top', they are the only people with the ability to achieve substantial liquidity, and therefore, to make any money. This is why they say it resembles a Ponzi scheme more than an actual market.

      How very amusing.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    4. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > > proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.
      >
      > Right, I will make sure to email you when I'm sick and need groceries, or to look after my kid when I need to go out a bit.

      And if you'd spent more time with your computer instead of your SO, you wouldn't have a kid who needs looking after when you need to go out a bit. More importantly, you'd have finished that "nifty robot who'd be able to go out and get your groceries for you when you're sick" project that's been sitting in your basement since you left college.

      "I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping,
      Robo-guitar gently weeps.
      I look at the floor, and I at least Roomba's sweeping,
      Robo-guitar gently weeps."

    5. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Funny

      But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

      Why do you think we fund cloning research?

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    6. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dr00g911 · · Score: 4, Informative

      (For my part, I'm still not convinced we're not dealing with a slashvertisement.) Um, the PR Newswire credit was all I needed to know it was a slashvertisement.

      Yeah, I work with Ad/PR agencies. Anything on Newswire is bought, paid for then copied & pasted as "news" around the globe. That's the point.
    7. Re:Techno-Dystopia by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, you're surprised government is a Ponzi scheme?

      Try, "All of Western society." Basing large organizations on finance resembles nothing more than using a just in time compiler to me. The amusing thing is that it appears there's no way people are smart enough as a whole to either design or accept a more intelligent solution.

      Reading the Wikipedia article on Ponzi shows something quite interesting - he gave people exactly what they wanted, and the only ones to get advantageous results were those who cashed out right before it all fell apart. Just another story of catastrophic market failure; I love how everyone sees these things coming and noone says, "Wait. How do we stop this before it gets too big?"

    8. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dr00g911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a difference between journalism and press releases that are copied and pasted as news, or polished by a "writer" and published in local newspapers or websites like this one to fill space.

      They're what are referred to in the industry as advertorials, and they run the gamut from sleazy to benign, but don't be fooled for a moment that you're not looking at full on advertising. Client pays agency, agency writes article, agency broadcasts to PR newswire, Slashdot picks it up (among others).

      Not sure what jealousy has to do with anything, it's an issue of trust in the media and making the distinction between journalism and paid flack.

      Your eyes were bought by Supportsoft. If you don't have issues with that being framed as news, then please do us all a favor the next time there's an election and stay home.

    9. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to ask my elderly neighbor (before she had to go to an assisted living home) if I could pick her up anything during my trips to the market. She couldn't drive anymore and her knees were shot from arthritis.

      "I have to try that some day."

      You should, some people really need the help.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    10. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try, "All of Western society." Basing large organizations on finance resembles nothing more than using a just in time compiler to me. The amusing thing is that it appears there's no way people are smart enough as a whole to either design or accept a more intelligent solution.

      Reading the Wikipedia article on Ponzi shows something quite interesting - he gave people exactly what they wanted, and the only ones to get advantageous results were those who cashed out right before it all fell apart. Just another story of catastrophic market failure; I love how everyone sees these things coming and noone says, "Wait. How do we stop this before it gets too big?"


      You're missing a key difference between ponzi schemes and "all of western society"

      The participants in a ponzi scheme contribute nothing beyond their initial deposit. The orchestrators of the scheme generate nothing. The participants of capilitalistic western societies create new wealth every single day they go to work.

      Now, if you said "socialistic western societies who operate extensive welfare states" you'd be exactly correct. If you avoid large scale wealth transfer between participants that decreases the motivation to work or the necessity thereof, then there's no reason it would ever implode.

      Any which way, in terms of western societies collapsing like a ponzi scheme.... I bet France is first. Check out their economy. I might be wrong but I don't think so.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  2. Does that include work-related computer use? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And does it include time spent by all the stereotypical geeks who don't have significant others?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That, and does it consider time spent sleeping with your SO (and yes, I actually mean sleeping, not other "activities") as time together? My guess is that it doesn't. So, this is a very believable statistic. I spend all day at work with a computer, and some time at home. I only spend about 5 - 6 hours of waking time with my wife a day. It really doesn't say anything about how our lives are spent, just acknowledges that computers are becoming a bigger part of our lives, but they are not necessarily intruding upon our time with our families.

  3. I Would Comment On This... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but I have to go have sex with my wife.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:I Would Comment On This... by mockchoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you at least wait until I'm done?

    2. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No worries. I got it covered.

    3. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not have cybersex? Then you can do both!

      (Just don't forget your robe and wizard hat.)

  4. My PC is my SO by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    You insensitive clod!

    1. Re:My PC is my SO by bartyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once upon a time, my SO was a PC, too. Until I discovered that her beige box was full of viruses, that she was rooted by strangers and that neighbours would piggyback on her fat pipe.

  5. In other news by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdotters, known to not have SOs, are believed to have caused a great innacuracy/bias in this report.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  6. Coincidence.. by zyl0x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also, on a completely different topic, World of Warcraft subscriptions have exceeded 8 million.

    --
    Blerg.
  7. Sounds right by WinterSolstice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my family, my wife is a writer. I'm an IT guy. At night, we play WoW together.

    Added together, our total time at home together (including sleep) is about 11 hours. That means 13 hours is spent with a computer seperately right off the bat.

    Considering our nights are often spent playing 3-4 hours of WoW, that puts it at 17 hours on the computer per day. Even at best, we would spend probably 3-4 hours a day together, which wouldn't even put a dent in the usual 8-10 hours at work with a computer.

    -WS

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  8. who are these people?! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the hell comes out with studies like this? Whos idea is it to waste money studying and interviewing people to come up with useless stats like this and what are they trying to do? Since almost everyone uses computers, almost everyone knows that they're usefull for just about everything, and almost everyone knows that there's rarely something wrong with people who spend "too much" time on them, I guess we're left with the logical assumption that it's either the Amish or really old politicians sponsering these stupid studies. I bet they presented the stat in the way they did disregarding that like 90% of that time occurred at work. Ugh, why don't they just stop living in the 90's and give up their ridiculous notions that everyone who uses a computer is an antisocial loser and shouldn't.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:who are these people?! by lonechicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently you have not noticed the huge rise in obesity in the United States. It seems like there's a rise in anorexia in the U.S. as well. Everytime I see a bunch of teenagers around, the group is made up of some fat kids and some bony kids. Barely any in the middle. Now that I think about it, adults are like this too. Where is the middle ground???
    2. Re:who are these people?! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      All the normal ones have been eaten; the bony ones are next.

  9. Is this a surprise? by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What percentage of people spend more time at work than with their significant other?
    The vast majority.

    What percentage of people who have a PC with broadband at home (the demographic targeted by this study) use a PC at work?
    65% doesn't sound far off.

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  10. It's all about prioritization by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife was getting pretty upset about my gaming time (especially on WoW), so now we came to an agreement. I only spend 1 hour a day on gaming (2 on Sat & Sun), and we've created a date night once a week that I don't even use the computer at all. It's made for a lot smoother relationship, and in reality I've found it much more satisfying than simply just playing games.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  11. Only 65%!!!? by revlayle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Either way, I believe it. Personally, I have no idea why I live with other people anymore, less have any actual serious relationships. However, while I use a computer a LOT (over 65% easily... part of the job), even at times when I am not on the PC much, I still have the same attitude, so it may be that I'm just an asshole. :)

  12. Color me suprised! by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wow, a study commissioned by support.com says people need support! From a PR newsire, nonetheless. And we're not even people, but "consumers". Come on, if you're going to write fake news reports on fake studies, at give the appearnace of trying by not using marketroid speak.

    Tag this one as "shill".

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  13. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for National Mandatory Sex and Cuddling Day.

    (Verify word was "nearby"? Must be a sign....)

  14. Grow closer apart. by w33t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People spend more time with lots of things than with their SO. I would argue that this can be healthy.

    After all, if you want to get sick of someone there is no better way than spending every waking moment with them.

    I know it's all down to personal preference, but I find that time apart is every bit as important as time together.

    The trick is to balance the two - too much of one or the other is bad, you need just the right amount of together and seperate time.

  15. I used to- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Insightful

    spend nearly all my time outside of work on my PC. Then I got a job in the PC world, and then I quit being on it outside of my normal job.

    Then I met a girl, and got married. Since she turned out to be a complete psycho bitch (I should have known...should have known) and now spend all my free time *back* on the PC, and away from her as much as possible.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:I used to- by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      spend nearly all my time outside of work on my PC. Then I got a job in the PC world, and then I quit being on it outside of my normal job.
      Then I met a girl, and got married. Since she turned out to be a complete psycho bitch (I should have known...should have known) and now spend all my free time *back* on the PC, and away from her as much as possible.


      Hey, I spend most of my after work time either playing video games or sitting infront of the computer. My wife and parents complain that I'm anti-social because I don't get out to go to church, or take the kids to boy scouts and/or girl scouts or attend all the PTA meetings. What's freaking ironic is that I'd be considered "social" by just freaking showing up standing around and not saying anything for 30 min - 1 hour half. How is that social? That I meet five strangers and might have picked up their names? Am I odd that the only humans that I care about or my existing family and friends? I don't want to run out and form a vast social network. Being social is being in a setting with a few others and discussing a few topics. I can do that through many mediums why is it socially accepted to be social to be physical lurker but when you are a non lurker on the on-line world you are seen as anti-social?

  16. And They're Probably Less Dependent On by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In fact, more than 8 out of 10 Americans (84%) say they are more dependent on their home computer now than they were just three years ago.
    Shocking 'facts' aren't they? But they failed to mention that these people who find themselves more dependent on computers probably find themselves less dependent on other things. For instance, transportation. You don't have to go down to the mall and hoof around looking for a CD or even books for that matter. You don't have to go out to rent videos--just use Netflix or Blockbuster. Why are malls becoming predominantly clothing stores? Because you can't try clothes on online. You can do your banking online now and I'm sure the things you can do online instead of driving your vehicle to the office to make the payment are numerous.

    And I'll bet these people are a little less glued to their televisions than they were three years ago. And instead of going to the movies or getting hammered at a bar, they might find an online game to be a bit more entertaining.

    The obvious downside is that I'm sure that some people are probably less active than they were before, but not all of them. If you percieve this to be a growing threat or strain on relationships, market software/hardware that makes the PC experience something shared between two people. I know tons of couples (and families) that have two or more computers and they simply play games like WoW together.

    Honestly, I don't see anything unhealthy with this trend so long as the people excersize or go out walking/running once a week or more.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  17. And in pre-information-age societies.... by ciaohound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    65% spend more time with their plow horse/tractor/butter churn/machine tool/slide rule/whatever than they spend with their spouse. The division of labor has always taken spouses away from each other to some extent. Of the discretionary time that spouses could choose to either be together or apart, well, has that changed significantly?

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  18. One of us. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    PR Newswire reports that 65 percent of consumers are spending more time with a computer than with their significant other (SO).

    One of us. One of us. One of us. One of us.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  19. Furthermore... by sterno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do the following get counted:

    * Time spent chatting with your SO online
    * Time spent with your SO in a room together both using computers where you're talking with eachother, etc

    Seems like those would be time on computer as well as time with SO. Then the question becomes how quality that time is considered to be.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Furthermore... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "And what about the time spent with your SO in a room both using computers while chatting with each other...."

      And what about the majority of those on Slashdot where the computer IS their significant other?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  20. The reason is simple by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    The PC does what you tell it to.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  21. Obvious why by hardcode57 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have much more sex when you're with your computer.

  22. Hmmmm... Significant Other... by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seem to remember having one of those... Someone nagged me when I was upgrading our router... but the memory is dim... Anyway, the food miraculously appears and somehow the children get to bed, so I suspect someone is in the house doing these things...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  23. Big Deal by cat_jesus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spend more time with my underwear than I do with my SO and she doesn't seem to mind it. It has the added benefit of keeping my dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of my pants.

    1. Re:Big Deal by LoveGoblin · · Score: 3, Funny
      It has the added benefit of keeping my dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of my pants.
      Unfortunately, they also keep your dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of her pants.
  24. Open Mouth, Insert Foot by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

    I listen to quite a few podcasts. I listen to them mostly when I'm doing housework. One day, I had just finished the dishes and had about ten minutes left on part one of MacCast's podcaster roundtable, so I sat down on the couch and took a quick break. My wife took that as the signal for "cuddle." Then she asked me "Why do you like listening to your people on your podcasts talk and not me?"

    I said "Because they talk about interesting things."

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  25. Re:cough*nerd*cough by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been married for 10 years, and my wife an I are both hardcore gamers. We have conversation, we watch some movies... but the main thing we do is play games together. Incidentally, we both play on the same team nearly all the time.

    I may be a nerd, but I know what works for my relationship :)

    -WS

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  26. Work time counts? by microTodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure. In a 168-hour week, I spend 56 hours sleeping, 50 hours at work on a PC, 8 hours at home on a PC, and maybe 36 hours quality time with my SO (4 hours per day during week, 8 hours per day on weekends).

    Does this mean I'm "ignoring" her for my PC? No, it means that I work.

    Back in the 1800s men on the farm probably spent more time with their horses than their wives...hmmm, that didn't sound so good...

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  27. Another B.S. Study by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After doing the RTFA stuff, I noticed something, umm, interesting? It doesn't bother to distinguish between using the computer at home, and using the computer at work. Considering the fact that MOST people spend more of their time WORKING then being AT HOME, 65% seems rather low now, doesn't it? I mean, is it REALLY true that 35% of Americans don't have to deal with a computer, constantly, at work? Good for them! Stupid B.S. sensationalist studies give scientific studies a bad name.

  28. Re:You forgot by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny

    *My SO is another avatar in Second Life