Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Release Date Announced

Croakyvoice writes "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling, the seventh and final book in the best-selling series, has been scheduled for release at 12:01 a.m. on July 21, 2007, Scholastic announced today." A deluxe edition for collectors and enthusiasts is also planned with a simultaneous release.

Comments

Live Blogging from B&N

[thesupermikey]

Just letting people know i started camping out in front of my local Barnes and Noble This afternoon. If anyone could bring me some coffee, that would be super-sweet.

Im going to get back to writing my erotic fan fiction where Hairy and lee adama from Battlestar Galactica become close friends (wink wink)

Re:Live Blogging from B&N

[Firehed]

Oh that's just so wrong. I bet he'd go for Starbuck though. Actually, probably Boomer, seeing that he had a thing for Asians :)

Re:Live Blogging from B&N

[Firehed]

Hm, 50% Insightful? I love my karma as much as the next guy, but I think some moderator is taking these slightly-perverted erotic fanfic ideas a little too seriously. But, whatever, I can't complain.

Cue spoiler t-shirts.

[Kadin2048]

I'm sure the T-shirt printers are getting ready: "Harry Potter dies on page 573, I just saved you 15 hours and $29."

Re:Cue spoiler t-shirts.

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm sure the T-shirt printers are getting ready: "Harry Potter dies on page 573, I just saved you 15 hours and $29."

It's going to be hilarious when you're torn limb from limb by a horde of enraged 12 year old girls.

Re:Cue spoiler t-shirts.

[miyako]

Actually, it's the last book because since the beginning of the series, she planned on making 1 book for each of the seven years at Hogwarts.
I don't think that it's fair to criticize the fans of the series. There are certainly people who are fans of the series who are young, or who are older and not well read, but there are also many people who are well read and can appreciate the stories.
As for the comments regarding the plotlines being predictable, the series does make use of a number of themes that are common to the fantasy genre, and certainly in retrospect it is easy to see how the plot has followed those common themes. I think this applies especially to the large thematic arches of the series. There are, however, surprising and interesting subplots that can be enjoyed.
The thing is though, even these subplots are not exceptionally intricate, and I do not think that the series is meant to be read like a standard mystery or thriller, where you spend the book trying to figure out who done it, where, how and why. The series isn't really about telling a new story and trying to figure that story out. I think that the real strength of the series is it's implementation of common fantasy themes. To use the cliche`, it's about the journey, not the destination. Reading the Harry Potter series is about seeing how these traditional events unfold in a certain time and place. The author understand that, and focuses on those elements of the story- creating a vibrant living world with three-dimensional characters and exploring how these recurring themes effect them and the world they live in.
It is perfectly fair to not like the series, but don't completely dismiss it or the people who enjoy it.

Re:Cue spoiler t-shirts.

[rucs_hack]

A reasoned response with well thought out arguments? On Slashdot?

Dude, I mean really, that's just not the way its supposed to happen....

Re:Cue spoiler t-shirts.

[David Horn]

With the greatest possible respect, you Sir, are a moron. The vast majority of people find Harry Potter an enjoyable read - primarily because they're not approaching it expecting War and Peace and looking to criticise. Bear in mind that it's got millions of kids reading, and for that alone the Harry Potter series is priceless and JK Rowling deserves to be applauded.

Summary of the story

[Frogbert]

1. Harry goes to school.
2. After a few weeks something weird starts to happen.
3. Ignore it until just before the school year ends.
4. Find out what was causing whatever was weird to happen.
5. Defeat it/Showdown with Voldemort.

But seriously I love the books.

Re:Summary of the story

[ocbwilg]

1. Harry goes to school.

Ha! You're obviously wrong, as Hogwart's was closed at the end of book 6 and Harry wasn't planning on going back anyways! Loser!

Re:Summary of the story

[Anonymous Coward]

Missed one:
2.5 Harry stars in the school production of Equus, and gets rave reviews.

What? NOT a Vista article?

[GFree]

Unless this new Harry Potter book has some gratuitous Microsoft/Vista-basing incorporated somehow, it has no place on Slashdot!

Since when do books have more than one edition?

[Anonymous Coward]

"A deluxe edition for collectors and enthusiasts is also planned with a simultaneous release."

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Deluxe Edition
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Ultimate Edition
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Home Premium Edition
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Home Basic Edition
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Business Edition
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Enterprise Edition ...

Don't think it won't happen.

Re:Spoilers

[taustin]

Page 608? I would think she'd wait until the last half of the book, at least.

Gotta give her credit

[edwardpickman]

All jokes aside it's impressive accomplishment to go from a single mother on the dole to the most successful author of all time and she's still relatively young. The big question really has to be what next?

Re:Gotta give her credit

[Bwana Geek]

I'm guessing we go 2 or 3 years with nothing, then out comes Harry Potter Jr. and the Redundant Storyline of Destiny.

Re:Gotta give her credit

[dr_dank]

The Harry Potter series may not be Ulysses, but it did weave a tapestry of fantasy that not only appealed to a wide range of readers, but also grew with the kids that they were primarily aimed at. The protagonist went from having normal adolescent troubles being the most of his worries to being thrust into adulthood to face a showdown with a frightfully powerful antagonist and his followers. Green Eggs and Ham, this ain't.

All this aside, when has there been this much hoopla over a book in recent times? People will camp out in front of stores for the latest game consoles, hottest movies, etc, but its truely unique to see that kind of reception for a book. Instead of rotting their brains in front of the tv sets, kids are exercising their imaginations with these books and *gasp* even picking up other books along the way. Kids who may not have otherwise gotten into reading for pleasure have been introduced to it from reading Harry Potter.

If this is "catering to the lowest common denominator", then I say we need much more of it.

Re:Gotta give her credit

[NMerriam]

She's the literary Britney Spears.

In their own times, so were Charles Dickens and William Shakespeare. Don't even get me started on Dumas.

The only question is whether the story and craft appeals across generations, which Harry Potter seems to do very well so far.

Re:Gotta give her credit

[daviddennis]

i have enjoyed reading her books.

I have never, at any point, enjoyed the "music" created by Britney Spears.

The fact that people ranging from kids to Slashdotters to more or less typical adults have enjoyed the books seems like an excellent tribute to their quality. It's very hard writing something a general audience enjoys. In particular, very few science fiction/fantasy authors have done it.

I think fans of SF/fantasy should be congratulating her on her success instead of trying to cut her down.

The general public sometimes shows surprisingly decent taste. This is one of these times.

D

s/wand/wang/g

[frogstar_robot]

http://www.bash.org/?111338

Ma-Fi???

[Wilson_6500]

We already have a genre for "Magic Fiction."

Fantasy.

Re:Ma-Fi???

[User 956]

We already have a genre for "Magic Fiction." Fantasy.

I thought that was the genre for those novels at the supermarket with Fabio on the cover?

Re:Ma-Fi???

[rblancarte]

We already have a genre for "Magic Fiction." Fantasy.

I thought that was the genre for those novels at the supermarket with Fabio on the cover? No that is called Trash.

RonB

Spoilers...

[penguin_dance]

I've got the scoop the story:
"The school and Harry's friends are scandalized when he shows up to the prom naked on a horse."

Ooops...sorry, wrong story.

Re:Spoilers...

[ralphc]

Must...resist...magic...wand...jokes...

Re:Regardless of the release date

[porcupine8]

I've honestly never seen an honest-to-god HP spoiler. Where do you find them? There's always tons of speculation, but the only real info is whatever JKR releases on her site - which is rarely to never anything really useful. There were some supposed "spoilers" of Dumbledore's death, but there were just as many sites saying it was going to be Hagrid (or one of several other characters).

The release date will be delayed 17 times

[Anonymous Coward]

And when it's finally released, the middle 300 pages that promised all kinds of things will be missing.

That'll make it a Vista article.

Re:Harry Potter and the Grammar Nazi?

[Yosho]

"Deathly" is a perfectly good word. It means "like or resembling death." "Deadly," on the other hand, means "causing death."

Re:Sci Fi

[1u3hr]

And WTF is the idea of linking to a random gaming forum for this "news"?

The publisher's press release is here. Why does Slashdot indulge people who cut and paste from a primary source to their lousy site/blog/forum/Piquepaille to get clicks? Aside from the clicks, it often gets distorted and cut to the submitter's agenda, or just cluelessness.

Re:missed opportunity

[maxume]

Great. All we need is 363 more terrorist attacks and nobody will be able to do anything anymore for fear of not being sensitive enough.

Re:Sweeeet!

[Anonymous Coward]

omg you should do that while dressed up as wizards, having sex

Re:Good news for OOTP movie

[Frogbert]

Wow what an amazing and fortunate coincidence!

Re:Regardless of the release date

[bladesjester]

So's the guy who played him.

I know the guy was a method actor, but dang, that's just taking it a little too far...

Re:Sci Fi

[jmorris42]

> And WTF is the idea of linking to a random gaming forum for this "news"?

Can I get an AMEN?

It needs to be a rule that only primary sources get linked. That means a blog can't be linked unless the primary content of interest to the /. crowd is the actual creative output of the blogger and not some asshole's opinion about a link to a primary source. Commentary from random assholes is what SLASHDOT is for. Lets not get all circular with slashdot posting a link to a forum talking about a blog post that said something interesting about a piece on a newspaper's website about a piece of proposed legislation on some congressman's website. The potential for a huge circlejerk here is massive.

Besides, when the article links to a site with comment posting discussion should be taking place on that site, not slash. So Hey, Taco! Why the hell do you want to drive those valuable comments (pageviews) to another site? Huh?

Re:Sweeeet!

[aaza]

I put on my robe and wizard hat...

Re:Sci Fi^H^H^H^H^H FANTASY!!!

[rblancarte]

AMEN.

This is my biggest problem w/ people posting their own works. Because while maybe they have some good stuff to contribute, I know they are really just looking for people to get clicks on their page.

And overall, I think the official release on site or any of the numerous sites that cover this would have done better.

And why no props for JK Rowling herself?

RonB

Couldn't resist.

[Kadin2048]

The problem with the Harry Potter books is that my wife cheats ...

To be fair, I'm not sure why that's Harry Potter's problem.

Re:'scifi'?

[mikeisme77]

That is the current thinking in the English Literature Academia world, yes. Science Fiction/Sci Fi (Sci Fi is a sub-genre of science fiction--where science ficition contains real science and sci fi is for cheap thrills), fantasy, and horror (technically the proper labeling of horror is dark fantasy) all fall under the umbrella term "Speculative Fiction". This is due to the fact that they often have overlapping elements. For example, Star Wars has both science fiction (spaceships) and fantasy (the Force/magic) elements in it; Frankenstein has horror (scary monster) and science fiction (reanimating a corpse through electricity) elements to it, and so on and so forth.

So while it would be ok to label Harry Potter speculative fiction, it would not be okay to label him with the sub-genre label of sci fi (since there is neither fake nor real science in it)--Harry Potter is clearly made up of almost entirely fantasy elements (although at a stretch one might be able to say there are some dark fantasy/horror elements). One of my professors as an undergrad was the co-editor of Science Fiction magazine and I took his class on science fiction. I'm also friends with an English literature professor and have taken my fair share of literature classes (as required to graduate with a degree in creative writing).