Slashdot Mirror


Dell Laptop Burns House Down

Nuclear Elephant writes "The Consumerist is running a story about a house burned down by a Dell laptop. 'My 130-year-old former farm house was engulfed in flames, with thick dark smoke pouring out of the windows and roof... Hours later, after investigation the fire marshal investigator took me aside asked me if I had a laptop computer. Yes — I told him I had a Dell Inspiron 1200.' It was determined that the laptop, battery, or cord malfunctioned after its owner left for work, leaving the fire to spread through the entire house. All attempts to contact Dell have failed. 'I have tried to call Dell to at least notify them of my problems, but each time I have called I get transferred into an endless loop of "Joe" or "Alan" all speaking a delectable version of English I presume emanates from Bangalore. I have been outright hung up on each time I get someone who speaks a reasonable version of English, or sounds like they might be in charge of something. Promises of call backs have gone, of course, unreturned.'"

34 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. Dell Tech Support? by jkj5301 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what do you want "Alan" to do about it? Send another replacement parts?

  2. calling Dell.... or a lawyer? by BugDoomBug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At this point I believe the best thing would be to call a lawyer who has experience handling cases such as this. While this one is possibly a first, I am sure there are a slew of them out there who specialize in suing companies due to damage caused by faulty manufacturing or defective parts.

    In the event that this was not faulty manufacturing or parts, for example if the man frayed his cord and left it damaged, then he doesn't have a leg to stand on, otherwise it should be pretty straight forward if it shows it in the report on the fire.

    1. Re:calling Dell.... or a lawyer? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      otherwise it should be pretty straight forward if it shows it in the report on the fire.

      Not necessarily. In issues of civil tort, liability can be proportioned among different parties. For example, if somebody dashed into the street to get a ball and was hit by a car driven by a man who was busy tuning his radio at the time, they might decide that the accident was 60% the driver's fault and 40% the victim's.

      In this case, if I am not mistaken, these batteries were recalled months ago. A good lawyer--and you can bet a company like Dell will have several--is going to argue that there comes a point where they have acted responsibly and issues like this are entirely in the hands of the consumers. I think if we're being fair to Sony/Dell--hard around here, I know!--we would agree that that is true. We might not agree on what amount of time has to pass before that happens, but... well, that would be for a jury to decide.

      This has two very real implications for this homeowner:

      1. Even if he wins his case, he may not receive enough money to replace his home (and presumably possessions) to a state similar to what they were before.

      2. The insurance company may not want to pursue legal action. In fact, they may want to choose to screw the consumer. Win a lawsuit or pay the policy, either way the insurance company would pay out--the third option is to basically agree with what the Dell lawyer is bound to say, that the homeowner was largely at fault, and see how much they can wiggle out of.

      I DO think he would win a fair deal of money if he sued, but it's not quite as simple as "bad battery = fire = $$$."

  3. Dell Laptop... or Sony Battery? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it's not a model listed on the https://www.dellbatteryprogram.com/ website, but they do state many batteries were sent out as replacements too. Guess it'll be difficult to read the battery pack serial number now...

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  4. Let the insurance company handle it. by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let the insurance company handle it. That is what you pay them for, they don't want to pay the claim themselves and the insurance company has the deep pockets to cover legal fees.

  5. Re:Pshaw! by Bin_jammin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's nothing, a single mp3 put my whole family in the poorhouse.

  6. One wonders where the liability is by RulerOf · · Score: 3, Insightful
    At first glance I had thought this was the poster child for what could go wrong with the ill fated battery debacle that Dell and others had gone through, but, FTA:

    I told him I had a Dell Inspiron 1200.
    His model isn't on Dell's official list of affected models. So, one wonders, was it the "laptop, battery, or cord" that started the fire? I would imagine that if the cord wasn't severely mangled, and assuming the laptop itself didn't have a very serious manufacturing flaw (that probably would have prevented it from working in the first place), perhaps the transformer was at fault.

    Reading the article though, I found it very... unsatisfying. It seems more that the real news is the writer's inability to get any meaningful correspondence with Dell about this particular issue... but then again, that isn't really news.
    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  7. Re:Slashdot fixed it! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So before everyone starts ragging on Dell, remember there are at least a couple of good apples there.

    I used to know a guy who worked for the local council cutting grass. One day he was driving to a job and noticed someone trying to cut a big site full of high grass with a small domestic lawn mower. He stopped, unloaded the slasher, did the job as a favour and was on his way in five minutes.

    All was fine until the guy with the mower called the council to publicly thank the employee who had helped him, wherupon all hell broke lose.

    So whatever you do don't ring Dell to report this guy for being good. Dell don't want to be good and we should judge the company by its official actions, despite the fact that 99% of the people who work there are nice people who rescue kittens, etc.

  8. Inspiron 1200 NOT part of recall by Foerstner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's get this one out of the way first: the Inspiron 1200 was not one of the models listed in the recall program.https://www.dellbatteryprogram.com/

    I would like to know if the battery in the defective unit was one of the batteries subject to recall. If it was, then the owner bears some responsibility.


    IANAL (and this is not legal advice, yadda yadda...) but I think that, in order to prove that in court, you'd have to prove that A) the battery was one of the Sony recalled batteries B) The customer could reasonably be expected to have been aware that the battery in his laptop was one of the recalled batteries C) Despite knowing that the battery was dangerous and subject to recall, the customer did nothing to get a replacement

    But more than this, the maker of the battery was likely of Sony origin and quality.
    Which would only add a co-defendant in the lawsuit, if the guy were to go down that road.

    And really, what is Dell supposed to say to claims of "you've burned my house down?"

    Excellent point. If someone accused me of that, all I'd say is, "No comment." The next thing I'd say is, "Let's talk confidential settlement. Howzabout I give you a million dollars for your house, without admitting any liability?"

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
  9. Re:Agent for service of process by Score+Whore · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's very unlikely that he has a product liability case here. First, the whole Dell (Sony) battery catching on fire thing is old news. The defective batteries were all shipped from April - July of 2006. Second, Dell has issued a safety recall and anyone who has chosen not to participate is going to have a hard time winning a case. Third, the Inspiron 1200 wasn't one of the affected systems. Fourth, it's astonishing that hours after the fire the have such a detailed explanation of events. "Laptop failed." That kind of forensics process takes a lot longer than a handful of hours. While anyone's home burning down is unfortunate, putting the blame on Dell sounds very opportunistic. It'd be interesting to see where this guy stood on his mortgage payments....

  10. Insurance by SamBeckett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Presumably you have insurance? If so, this little stunt could cost you your claim...

    Insurance policies have a clause in it re: subrogation. E.g. If Dell is really at fault--the insurance company will pay you directly, and then go after Dell for the money..

    BUT your policy also has a clause in it saying that you must not do anything to obstruct the insurance company's ability to subrogate. This little slashdot stunt and posting your story online may just do that.. You may have fscked yourself twice over.

  11. Re:Too Bad, So Sad by towsonu2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He should have sent his battery in for the recall instead of ignoring it and convincing himself it couldn't happen to him.
    You don't have many friends outside the geek community, do you? Me neither but I know at least three people who owned a Dell laptop and knew nothing about the battery recall. When I told them about the recall, they got really surprised and worried, went online, checked with Dell, and it turns out that their batteries were eligible.


    Summary for easy understanding: Dell did not do enough to tell its consumers about the battery recall.

  12. Am I the only one who doesn't believe? by bgfay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may have happened, but the whole thing sounds like a load of crap. It's the sort of thing that usually arrives in my email inbox with "FWD" appended to it.

    Seriously, has this been sourced?

    --
    Yeah, I'm as old as my UID would suggest.
  13. laptop charging on the sofa? by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I had left the laptop in sleep mode with the lid closed on the edge of the sofa in the living room

    I'll take the odds that the sofa was the most flammable piece of furniture in his house. We do this all the time, but still...we should know better. I would probably also be asking whether there were functioning smoke detectors or a more sophisticated alarm system in place. Something very basic, but, again, too easily forgotten.

    1. Re:laptop charging on the sofa? by novakreo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll take the odds that the sofa was the most flammable piece of furniture in his house. We do this all the time, but still...we should know better. I would probably also be asking whether there were functioning smoke detectors or a more sophisticated alarm system in place. Something very basic, but, again, too easily forgotten.

      What good would a smoke detector do when an unoccupied house is going up in flames?
      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
  14. Just curious... by AEton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you write "Good luck, sorry to hear about your loss!", to whom exactly are you saying that? The person who posted this Slashdot article isn't the same as the person who submitted content to the blog that Slashdot links to. You're talking to a wall, in other words, and odds are pretty high that the consumerist poster will never read these comments.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
  15. Re:A humble suggestion by Babbster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to be the one to break it to you, but people often do find out when stories about their life make it onto Slashdot, it being a fairly well-known site. Your helpful information is just arrogant nitpicking.

  16. Re:Pshaw! by Popsmear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Online petitions are a joke and a waste of time. To date an online petition has never changed anything. http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/petition/internet.ht m I'm sure it will work great. :\

  17. Re:Pshaw! by try_anything · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bah, this has nothing to do with looking out for his interests and getting fair compensation for his loss. His homeowner's insurance company is already handling it, and if he wants to recover damages not covered by his insurance, he knows the next step is to call a lawyer, not Dell.

    So, if he knows this (and I think it's safe to assume he does), why is he calling Dell? A house burning down is not like a hard drive dying. Calling them on and the phone and expecting to have a casual chat about a matter relating to insurance claims and possible legal action is asinine and simply obnoxious. "Notify" them? Gimme a break. No wonder they hung up on him. It's the only safe thing to do when a guy calls you repeatedly and fishes for comments about an issue that may be discussed in court.

    I'm sure the guy is taking appropriate steps to protect his interests. This stuff about calling Dell is nothing but entertainment; it's completely irrelevant to resolving the matter, and he knows it. He's just wasting their time and trying to embarrass them.

  18. Some advice by Giro+d'Italia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, STFU in public about what happened. Not online, definitely not to the news media. Anything you say, especially if you speculate as to the cause, could come back to haunt you if this ever goes to trial.

    Repeat "no comment" to yourself aloud a few hundred times to get used to it.

    Next, call your insurance company. Let them sort it out. Let their lawyers fight it out with Dell if the laptop is determined to be the cause.

    We don't let lawyers write code, by the same token, you shouldn't try to handle this with Dell yourself. You shouldn't be contacting them at all.

  19. Re:Pshaw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What will the petition be about exactly? A petition to make it so that you don't have to talk to the particular branch of tech support for the type of warranty you paid for? You get routed somewhere different depending on whether you're a business or consumer. Some people get to talk to Americans, some get to talk to Canadians. You are not supposed to be helped by someone other than your division because it gets charged out of the wrong place and screws up budgeting and whatever. This guy didn't want to talk to someone with an Indian accent (I can guess why he got hung up on), well fuck him. I work for Dell Canada. It really pisses me off when a caller makes a point of expressing relief to hear an "American" voice "at last". It pisses me off more when some of the people they are complaining about happen to work right next to me. Yes, this is Canada, where we have a whole bunch of different people and don't freak out trying to talk to any of them that don't sound like us. I have no sympathy for this guy.

  20. Re:Something fishy... by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without actually seeing the scene, it's hard to presume the laptop would be destroyed. Consider the possibility that it sparked for a few seconds, lighting curtains or polyurethane. The flames may have traveled up and left the laptop alone where it was buried under just enough debris to shield it a little, and it was identifiable within a few minutes as "probably a laptop." Fire marshals are trained to ID the source of a fire and I imagine they can narrow it down to a 10-foot area within an hour if the conditions are right. Again, without knowing the scene or seeing an actual report, it's impossible to say.

    And as for calling Dell, he did call his insurance company first.

    "Since the incident my homeowners company has been very interested in
    the information about the laptop. I have tried to call Dell to at
    least notify them of my problems, ... "

    Still, bad strategy. Never call a company to inform them of a pending claim/lawsuit; let the lawyers do that. One wrong word can kill a case.

  21. Re:Pshaw! by balloonhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Got your money's worth for the $400 warranty?

    Sounds more like you got screwed on the original purchase.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  22. How is that INSIGHTFUL??? by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The parent post is an utter and malicious lie.

    I have recordings (yes, you're not supposed to do that) of several Dell support calls my wife made in which their English was terrible, their accents were quite heavy, and they stayed with scripts and did not in any way show innovation or creative thought in their attempts to fix her broken machine.

    And that felgercarb about East Indians speaking better English than American call centers is pure racist bollocks. I manage a data center and we outsource rurally to a place in Oklahoma City, OK, and their English is light years superior. I ensure this, but really, I don't have to. We have people in Manhattan, some of whom come right over from Spanish Harlem, who speak better English.

    Let's not get into the tech support skills.

    As for attitude and rudeness, now neither side of the ocean can claim the high ground there. I've never ordered a rurally outsourced rep terminated for crappy English, but the owner of the company decided to end our Bangalore (company not spoken here) call center contract because of their unimaginative, scripted behavior, and we've fired a healthy number of Americans for being rude.

    But for you to say American reps - techies, no less - have poorer English skills than East Indian reps - is horribly wrong and very, very racist.

    It's like East Indian workers can do no wrong and we can do no right. Well, excuse me, but I'll vote with my money. And if the other 300 million Americans did the same, there would be no booming East India or China economy.

    You globalists depend on America's money. Otherwise you wouldn't sell so much to us. At least show us some respect .

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:How is that INSIGHTFUL??? by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      am sure American reps speak better English than Indians and they have their reasons too. They live in a society where they are forced to learn English as their first language. Indians are not. They learn it out of choice and speaking English is a personal decision.

      I learned a lot of Japanese myself. Then Japan took a crap all over its working class and the Japanese rich and powerful cashed out their country's economy and shipped their jobs to Korea, etc. Nihongo wa hitsuyoo ja nai. (The Japanese language is useless now.) Now if you want to be prosperous, the foreign language to learn is Chinese. I ain't going there. In the next 5 years it might be Swahili.

      Get my drift? With the world learning English because they want to sell to us primarily (but not employ us), and the corporate statist globalist goons running from one country to the next in search of cheap, disposable worker bees, the foreign language we English speaking people learn today, will be useless by tomorrow.

      You guys in India are already under low wage pressure from Eastern Europe and Africa. Ain't that a crying shame.

      Americans are smart. We know better than to drive a whole country to learn a foreign language when the one we learn won't be worth squat when we hit the job market.

      If you think call center employees write those scripts then God help you.

      But I didn't say that. Can't refute an argument aimed at killing an argument I didn't make.

      As far as blooming economy is concerned, when was the last time you heard India invading another country and making a quick buck on oil?? Indian economy is all about brain power.

      Say hi to Pakistan for me. Assuming either of you are still around in 10 years.

      Yes Indians go to western world and kick ass by proving to be more efficient, cost effective and by doing a job some dumb *enter nationality here* could not do at double the wages.

      Excuse me? We generate the intellectual property here, and outsource it to you. And most of that is generated by Americans. And lemme guess... "some dumb *enter nationality here*" translates to "some dumb non East Indian", right?

      You racist, arrogant pricks. But then I knew this already. I talked to you guys before we ended our BPO relationship with Mumbai & Bangalore. You look down on Americans - and a lot of others in this world - but you depend on us to buy your products.

      Did you ever hear a general racial out burst in India ?? I don't think so. How many Indians would like to say the same for western world?

      Racial outburst? Nope. But you sure as heck have it in for your women. How many baby girls have been aborted or strangled over there? Racial hatred is a monster all its own, but it doesn't light a candle against a misogynist culture that plays whack-a-mole with baby girls.

      Lets not compare the intelligence or IQ. George Bush was elected twice. 'nuff said.

      Okay, fine. If you're so much better, then build your tech industry yourself, without our help. Like we did. And yes, I know East Indians make up a large number of doctors and scientists in America, but feel free to shut them out of America if you wish. (They seem to come here more than we come there, what with all the onerous restrictions every foreign nation in the world has on immigration and work visas all that.) (You hear that, Americans? If you want to go to India or any other country to get your outsourced job back, it ain't gonna happen. But anyways.)

      Oh, what's that splashing sound? It's the sound of East Indian flaming arrogance crashing into the super ultra polluted Indian Ocean.

      PS: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/06/99061 0074044.htm

      Sincerely,
      Some dumb *enter nationality here* citizen
      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    2. Re:How is that INSIGHTFUL??? by Albanach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the UK ... recordings are only permitted if you're registered as a data controller under the Data Protection Act. That means people recording calls that they make is generally against the law.
      I'd be interested to know on what absis you say this - certainly Oftel disagree. Of course you should always consult a lawyer, but Oftel seem to believe that recording calls in the UK for personal purposes, where they won't be further distributed is perfectly legal and doesn't require you to register as a Data Controller under the DPA.

      The Data Protection Act also contains an exemption for personal data processing:
      Domestic purposes. 36. Personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of that individual's personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes) are exempt from the data protection principles and the provisions of Parts II and III.
    3. Re:How is that INSIGHTFUL??? by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Domestic purposes. 36. Personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of that individual's personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes) are exempt from the data protection principles and the provisions of Parts II and III.

      There are also exemptions to cover "detection and prevention of crime", "protecting the public from dishonesty, malpractice or other seriously improper conduct by, or the unfitness or incompetence of, persons authorised to carry on any profession or other activity,", "protecting members of the public against conduct which may adversely affect their interests by persons carrying on a business" and pretty much every other reason an individual might want to record their conversation with customer support, in case you think domestic purposes doesn't cover it.

  23. Re:Pshaw! by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why is he calling Dell? Because isurance can't replace a 130 year old farm house. That's why. The guy is pissed.

    Don't the people that answer the phone have away to escelate something like this? They can't refer them to their legal department? How the fuck hard is it? Dell should have a intranet to at least look up the freaking phone # to the proper department. Its not that thard to tell. Or you don't think so? Granted I don't know exactly how everything went down but the company should have been able to route the calls to the right department.

  24. Re:Pshaw! by try_anything · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't the people that answer the phone have away to escelate something like this?

    It sounds like he got escalated multiple times. But what could they do for him? Any company will route you to someone who will take down a complaint. ("I'd like to make a complaint" has never failed for me.) But that's not what he wanted to do. Any company will route you to the legal department if you have something legal to say... but he didn't. He didn't want to initiate any official process, because he's quite sensibly going to leave that to his insurance company and possibly his lawyer, if it comes to that.

    In fact, he says he only wanted to "notify" them of his "problems," which he was surely able to do. It only takes thirty seconds to tell the story, so he probably "notified" half the people he talked to. There's no explanation of why he kept calling, who he was trying to reach, or what kind of satisfaction he wanted from them.

    So what should Dell have done? Transfer him to the legal department -- no, he wasn't calling with any legal business. (He was probably offered the option anyway.) Let him tell his tale to a non-lawyer -- fine, he did. Have a non-lawyer discuss or even acknowledge what he said -- no way in hell.

    Granted I don't know exactly how everything went down but the company should have been able to route the calls to the right department.

    That's the point. There was no right department because there was nothing they could do for him. He can't even clearly say what it was he wanted. That's a pretty good way to get transferred around aimlessly and hung up on, especially if you get escalated to busy people who can tell you have no clear aim in calling.

    Another good way to get hung up on is to badger people about something they've told you they can't discuss. Suppose you were in a car accident and the other guy kept calling you and asking to talk about his medical problems. Wouldn't you start hanging up on him?

  25. Re:Agent for service of process by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm listing reasons why Dell has a lot on it's side, not a logical chain of conditionals.

    The argument would be that Dell doesn't have an endemic problem with fiery batteries in the Inspiron 1200 line. As such they would be unlikely to have a responsibility, as the cause of the fire could be the condition of the equipment. However, if this gentleman had personal experience with his particular laptop involving undue heat, and that there is a recall going on, he should have gotten involved. The article doesn't indicate that he did.

  26. Re:Pshaw! by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The assertion that a laptop can cause a house-fire affects more than just the ex-homeowner. It affects everyone, and it demand a PR response, and a rationale warning to consumers. Do not leave Dell laptops running unsupervised - comes to mind.

    I think the author is trying to raise public awareness about a devastating loss which could potentially affect each of us.

    Bear in mind - the probability of that risk is irrelevant. The probability of a terrorist death in your family is much smaller than the risk of a fatal car accident, but the President has made his a single-issue presidency by selling the fear uncertainty and doubt caused by (certain) dark-skinned people to white Anglo-Saxon protestants (which never weary of that sort of thing).

    This author is selling us a much more rationale risk with Dell as the responsible party. Dell will have to deal with this, and their failure to provide a PR person to the caller, means they now owe all of us an explanation.

    AIK

  27. Re:Slashdot fixed it! by crossmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's nice, when my 5.1 speakers were making popping and cracking sounds even when not plugged in, it took a 15 minute call to dell and I had a replacement set couriered out with shipping paid both ways. Made me feel better about not paying premium prices.

  28. This is the problem with customer service by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not giving a straight answer.

    In most cases, a customer would prefer to have a straight answer that they do not like over a run around and the possibility of compensation dangled in their face forever. Certainly they'd most like to get compensated when they think they should be, but if it comes down to it, what they want most is a straight answer as to what will be done about their case.

    I've seen it where I work and from companies I've called... reps are scared shitless of giving an answer the customer won't like, so they pussyfoot around it. Screw that noise. It's demeaning to the rep to have to do that, and in almost every case it only pisses the customer off even more. It is quite possible to deliver bad news in a way that is both polite and direct. They are screwed anyways, no need to make it worse by giving them a huge runaround.

  29. Age-old advice on dealing with 'customer service' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Never accept a 'no' from someone who doesn't actually have the authority to say 'yes'