Slashdot Mirror


SCO Vs. Groklaw

Conrad Mazian points us to an article in Forbes reporting that the SCO Group is trying to subpoena Pamela Jones of Groklaw. Except they can't find her. A few days ago PJ posted a note on Groklaw saying that she is taking some time away from the blog for health reasons; she didn't mention any SCO deposition. SCO's lawyers apparently believe that "Pamela Jones" does not exist and that Groklaw is penned by a team of IBM lawyers.

18 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. This is silly by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Informative

    See her wikipedia page. It lists her as author of several articles and co-author of a book. At some point she had to meet with editors or sign a contract, information about all of which is probably subject to subpoena. If SCO hasn't looked into this they're just spreading FUD. (The wikipedia article is the first listing when googling "Pamela Jones," for goodness sake: linky

    1. Re:This is silly by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not the wiki page itself, it's that the information in it is easily researched and verified.

  2. Re:say a word for PJ! by arun_s · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..she is one of the few public intellectuals who really inspire with her integrity, honesty, and quirkiness. I swear I almost shed a tear when she resigned from a paying job to quickly dispel the FUD-of-the-week about her.
    I started reading Groklaw late, but I did find about this incident too. The link is here.
    And here's a memorable quote from that post, where she's explaining her reasons for resigning:
    Money is nice, but integrity is everything. --PJ, Groklaw.
    Truly an amazing lady.
    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
  3. Re:did yall check the whois for groklaw? by jours · · Score: 2, Informative

    > go check out http://domainsbyproxy.com/
    >
    > awesome.. ;)

    That's the service GoDaddy uses when you chose "Make this domain private". They hold the registration and then just forward all the e-mail (and US mail too I believe) to whatever they have on record for you.

    Most registrars have something similar.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  4. Re:did yall check the whois for groklaw? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Optimism. There have been several cases where GoDaddy and DomainsByProxy gave up that information, even without subpoena - notably, recently, a certain security blog that got a lot of coverage on Slashdot a week or so ago.

  5. Re:Delay by plover · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think most people here should remember when Maureen O'Gara wrote that nasty piece
    Almost as nasty as this piece about the MoGTrolls.
    --
    John
  6. MOD PARENT UP! by imroy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whoever modded this down is an idiot. The fact is, Daniel Lyons at Forbes has a long history of attacking Groklaw and Pamela Jones. I believe he even once published the address from a 'whois' lookup on groklaw.net, believing that it was Pamela's address. Luckily she'd used a P.O box (or something) in a different state to register the domain. But that gives you indication of the ad hominim attacks that SCO and its supporters indulge in.

    Just do a Google search. Sadly, many of these articles have been linked from here on Slashdot, giving Forbes and Daniel the page hits they desire.

  7. Re:Seriously, no one's mentioned it yet? by proverbialcow · · Score: 2, Informative

    P.S.-How do i make the text the link i want on here?

    <a href="http://yourURLhere">Your text here</a>

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  8. At least you picked the right area code... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was actually posted to Slashdot ages ago. Of course, it's very old and he might well have changed it by now. I have absolutely no idea whether this information is still accurate. Here's a copy of that old post:

    End Reader Licensing Agreement

    By reading this, you agree not to sue me and not to use this information in any illegal manner.

    Here's all the contact info you should ever need for Mr. McBride.

    The SCO Group
    355 South 520 West
    Suite 100
    Lindon, Utah 84042 USA
    801-765-4999 phone
    801-765-1313 fax

    Contact SCO online
    http://www.thescogroup.com/company/feedback/index. html

    Darl C McBride
    1799 Vintage Oak Ln
    Salt Lake City, UT 84121-6539

    Darl's home phone #: (801)424-2006
    Darl's office phone #: 801-932-5820

    Email Darl: darl@sco.com

  9. what's so awesome? read their terms by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    "To comply with any applicable laws, government rules or requirements, subpoenas, court orders or requests of law enforcement"
    If they really wanted, they could probably subpoena this registrant for the information.. to the next one in the chain.

  10. Re:PJ is a journalist; will she go to jail? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doubtful. All of her sources are court filings (which are matters of public record) or things like SCO's own press releases (which are also public), so what's to protect?

  11. Re:I'd be stoked by JasonFWard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well having followed Groklaw almost from outset, and having watched a very distasteful episode where SCO paid a journalist to track down Pamela, who then posted an article showing pictures of PJ car, house a mother I pretty certain from that alone PJ is a real person.

    Added to that I've spoken to her on the phone and exchanged over the last few years perhaps a couple of dozen emails, she seems very real to me.

    BTW, the article I mention above was withdrawn almost if not totally by all the websites that carried it and indeed some news editors resigned from their posts in protests at what they and many others saw as a gross violation of privacy.

    All the details can be found on Groklaw itself, and Im sure creative use of the internet archive can bring back the disappeared articles no problem.

    And finally, whilst I have no idea about the status of PJ health, I can say from the conversation I had with her a couple of months back I was left thinking she felt pressured and harassed (she didn't say that, it was just the impression I got), I can also confirm from conversations I've had with her she holds herself to a very high level of integrity in what she does and says.

    That SCO are trying to find her again, after the last debacle just leaves me with an even bitterer taste in my mouth with SCO, something I didnt think was possible.

  12. Re:"PJ", very interesting.. by strider44 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's no secret that PJ treasures anonymity more than most people, very careful and maybe is slightly paranoid (though I don't think there's anything wrong with that)

    I've heard that a few people have met her in person, though most people don't talk so much about it because she likes her anonymity and most public figures respect that.

    Besides, if you read Groklaw enough you'll realise she's definitely one person and pretty definitely a woman. To tell the truth I really wouldn't be surprised if Pamela Jones isn't her real name, but to tell the truth names are not something I really care about. (strider, by the way, is not my real name)

  13. Re:did yall check the whois for groklaw? by pjones · · Score: 4, Informative

    ibiblio has hosted GrokLaw for years. But I am not Pamela Jones. We also host Eric S. Raymond's site. But I am not Eric S. Raymond.

    --
    Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  14. Scratch that... two suicides by rajafarian · · Score: 2, Informative
    There was Noorda's daughter and "Canopy IT director Robert Penrose also shot himself to death" and:

    Penrose's suicide allegedly resulted from the "heavy-handed and intimidating actions of Canopy's current management," including Mustard, according to Yarro in an affidavit after Yarro's conversations with several members of Penrose's family.

    This is nasty!

    This article is like an old family reunion, Maureen is there, Enderle makes an appearance... no Darl, though.
  15. Re:did yall check the whois for groklaw? by pjones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Frankly I don't have time to be Pamela Jones; being Paul Jones is a full time job with too much overtime! And GrokLaw existed quite a while before coming to ibiblio -- as did Eric S. Raymond's site.

    --
    Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  16. Do you really not know what that's spoofing? by spun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google "I like monkeys." Tom took that famous old Internet story and replaced the word "monkey" with "MoGTroll." I can't believe anyone here is unfamiliar with that story. Were you just being funny, and I missed it?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  17. Re:Ethics Rules and Devil's Advocate by SamShazaam · · Score: 3, Informative

    FTA: The SCO vs. IBM lawsuit won't go to trial until a related case, SCO vs. Novell (nasdaq: NOVL - news - people ), has been decided. That case, which is scheduled to be tried later this year, is the one for which SCO is attempting to take a deposition from Jones. All this talk about IBM is irrelevant. She is being deposed in the Novell case.