Slashdot Mirror


Kansas Adopts New Science Standards

porcupine8 writes "The Kansas State Board of Education has changed the state science standards once again, this time to take out language questioning evolution. This turnaround comes fast on the heels of the ouster given this past election to the ultra-conservative Board members who originally introduced the language. 'Science' has also been re-redefined as 'a human activity of systematically seeking natural explanations' (the word 'natural' had been previously stricken from the definition). If you'd like to see the new standards, a version showing all additions and deletions is available from the KS DOE's website (PDF)."

23 of 868 comments (clear)

  1. God Hates Kansas by ReidMaynard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look at all the tornados.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:God Hates Kansas by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look at all the tornados.

      That doesn't prove God hates Kansas. It just proves that he wants to transport their homes to magical lands occupied by midgets.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:God Hates Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >> Look at all the tornados.

      > That doesn't prove God hates Kansas. It just proves that he wants to transport their homes to magical lands occupied by midgets.

      That's "people of Munchkin stature," you insensitive clod!

      "Welcome to Munchkinland! Welcome to Munchkinland! Deal with it."

  2. Computer Science . . . by millisa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Henceforth, all activity and research in the field of computer science must be explained by natural phenomenom. The term 'bug' will use the September 9th, 1945 definition and nothing else. Unnatural explanations such as missing semi-colon's and its ilk fall into the category of religion and a belief structure not cohesive with the true definition of science.

  3. Re:The future of America by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I like his comment about if we come from monkeys, does that gives us the right to act like them?

    Considering the way Creationists jump up and down and fling poo every time the word Evolution is used, I'd say his question has already been answered.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  4. Re:Eternal Vigilance by Teresita · · Score: 3, Funny

    You have to watch these local governments. In 1897 in the Indiana state house there was a War on Pi which almost made it equal to 3.20

  5. Re:I just don't get it... by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Heresy! We have a perfectly rational explanation. 6000 years ago God created the Earth. There were people on it and those people were bad. So He caused a flood and wiped out everyone but Noah's family. And now, generations later, we're the result of Noah's sons and daughters having sex with each other to repopulate the Earth. Now whether you believe in God or not, I'm sure you can agree that this is the most sensible explanation for Kansas.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  6. Re:Eternal Vigilance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    saying 'goddidit' is easier than learning the facts.

    So what you're saying it that you're the retarded offspring of five monkeys that had butt sex with a retarded fish-squirrel?

  7. Re:Eternal Vigilance by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Funny

    and I would've gotten away with it TOO! If it hadn't been for you meddling kids!!!!!

    that's right, in full audio

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  8. Re:I just don't get it... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Noah didn't have any daughters, at least they aren't mentioned. Get your facts straight: his grandkids were the incestuous ones, getting it on with their first cousins. His sons' wives' pedigrees aren't known, or I can't recall them being mentioned.

    Tangent: first cousin incest isn't particularly risky and can be tolerated in the gene pool for several generations before it becomes an issue. With the genetic contributions of four families, it's not all that unrealistic.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  9. Re:Eternal Vigilance by 93,000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    He who laughs last is just a hand in the bush.

  10. But its obvious! by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eviolution is wrong. We were all created as part of an experiment by aliens. The experiment has since been abandoned.

    This argument is consistent with Intelligent Design. I wonder if the ID proponents would be happy about that being taught in schools.

  11. So um...tags.. by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not that I am questioning the wisdom of the fine system/people/whatever that determines which tags for a story are put on the front page but I fail to see how "buttsexwithfishsquirrels" is really..um...relevant.
    In closing
    "WTF PEOPLE?!"

    --
    Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  12. Re:Mulberry Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is Mulberry Jenna's age? Or younger?

  13. Re:"God Says it" by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah, it's not because people didn't get a proper education -- it's because ID is totally true and totally scientific. Haven't you ever read about it? ;)

    --
    "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
  14. Re:Serious mod abuse here by adam.dorsey · · Score: 2, Funny

    The extremists have mod points, apparently.

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  15. Re:Eternal Vigilance by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is easier for a pillar of salt to pass through the eye of a camel than to be out on a limb without a paddle.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  16. Re:Eternal Vigilance by inviolet · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what you're saying it that you're the retarded offspring of five monkeys that had butt sex with a retarded fish-squirrel?

    No. he is saying that he is the retarded offspring of five monkeys that had regular sex with a retarded fish-squirrel.

    Apparently, our next task in Kansas is to amend the sex education textbooks.

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  17. Good enough for Jesus by youthoftoday · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me"

    --
    -1 not first post
  18. Re:The future of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Evolution flips a coin thousands of times and discards the tails.

    Nice pun.

  19. Re:"God Says it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course, I would have to exist to do all that.

    Hell, you should be able to rectify that easily. You're omnipotent, aren't you?

  20. Re:"God Says it" by SimHacker · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you name would be Condaleeza Rice.

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  21. Re:Home School / Education Choice by dreadclown · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope that I am able to homeschool my upcoming child. I've had the amazing opportunity to meet a family that has made it work. It opened my eyes to the possibility of unthinkable things.. like a middle school girl that you don't want to choke to death after 4 minutes. That's saying something.
    So, you want to choke young girls to death? Well, that certainly is saying something.