I think you are forgetting that there is also copyright on the composition as well as the performance.
There is also the question of "substantial similarity", see e.g. the tale of George Harrison and "My Sweet Lord".
so the range of error is potentially somewhat greater. Technically you should determine probability distributions
for your error terms, and derive confidence intervals with 90%, 95%, 99% etc probability as required.
btw as others have noted, 1200 implies 1200 +- 0.5; 1200 +- 50 should be written as 1.2*10^3
It actually does properly lend itself as an ET-style tale
"Oh Jesus! Oh God! Oh Jesus! Mary mother Jesus of Nazareth!" -- Bean
As far as I can tell, this film is infected with the taint of the other great destroyer of SF film - Spielberg.
The story explores the concept of consensus reality and the development of adult modes of thinking, in
fairly dense philosophical discussion. Examples:
"Children are difficult from the mature animal because they think in another way.... The thought processes
of an infant are completely unimaginable"
This is *not* a kids' story!
Going from there to "...all we need to save the future Earth is a little girl's teardrop containing the crucial DNA."
is a textbook example of travesty.
I hope that I am able to homeschool my upcoming child. I've had the amazing opportunity to meet a family that has made it work. It opened my eyes to the possibility of unthinkable things.. like a middle school girl that you don't want to choke to death after 4 minutes. That's saying something.
So, you want to choke young girls to death? Well, that certainly is saying something.
IRV is just an example I could get over in a couple of sentences, and it does improve the chances for the third party candidates. None of these methods are "perfect" anyway.
Roughly speaking, when you fill out your ballot, you can essentially say: "I want this candidate to win, but if they don't, I'd rather have X than Y". On counting, the candidate with the lowest number of votes is eliminated from the running, and their second preferences are distributed to the remaining candidates, until one has a clear majority. Needing to count third or later preferences is rare but can affect close races.
Slashdot Mirror
A shotgun works fine too!
Well, that sounds like the thing that should not be...
Hmmmm..... Sage ..... Mulching ...... I know! I am the Prince of Chichester!
$ ">"!
-sh: >!: command not found
It's OK, it's intelligent design.
I think you are forgetting that there is also copyright on the composition as well as the performance. There is also the question of "substantial similarity", see e.g. the tale of George Harrison and "My Sweet Lord".
I spent about 6 months on 'hack' from the SCO Xenix games disk. Then at the maze level (circa 25) it dumped core. I couldn't believe my eyes.
Mod parent insightful!
(4 -
(4 +
so the range of error is potentially somewhat greater.
Technically you should determine probability distributions for your error terms, and derive confidence intervals with 90%, 95%, 99% etc probability as required.
btw as others have noted, 1200 implies 1200 +- 0.5; 1200 +- 50 should be written as 1.2*10^3
This is what happens when people invest in a movie to make money. Not to make a movie.
As far as I can tell, this film is infected with the taint of the other great destroyer of SF film - Spielberg.
"Children are difficult from the mature animal because they think in another way.... The thought processes of an infant are completely unimaginable"The story explores the concept of consensus reality and the development of adult modes of thinking, in fairly dense philosophical discussion. Examples:
This is *not* a kids' story!
Going from there to "...all we need to save the future Earth is a little girl's teardrop containing the crucial DNA." is a textbook example of travesty.
Yep. Thank goodness there was only one Library of Alexandria, or we'd be sloppin' over with crappy old scrolls!
You are now wearing +3 breeches of security.--More--
The unicorn kicks!--More--
Your nuts are unaffected.
Mr. User then says you're just bullshitting him with this "API" crap and gets a 1 week quote from a cowboy team.
At which point we have various branching decision paths, all of which result in misery for all concerned.
It is truly sad that no-one cares about the plight of those poor souls infected by aliens.
Speak for yourself. I'll wait for Thud SP1.
The rothe hits! The rothe hits! You die...
IRV is just an example I could get over in a couple of sentences, and it does improve the chances for the third party candidates. None of these methods are "perfect" anyway.
Roughly speaking, when you fill out your ballot, you can essentially say: "I want this candidate to win, but if they don't, I'd rather have X than Y". On counting, the candidate with the lowest number of votes is eliminated from the running, and their second preferences are distributed to the remaining candidates, until one has a clear majority. Needing to count third or later preferences is rare but can affect close races.
"We will have to estimate the impact" would probably work for taxi-driving too.
Right! This thread's got silly. So I'm stopping it.