Slashdot Mirror
XM And SIRIUS Radio Merging
lenny6998 writes to tell us Yahoo! News is reporting that XM and Sirius Radio, the only two major players in the relatively new market of subscription satellite radio have announced a merger. "The two companies said in a statement that Mel Karmazin, the CEO of Sirius, would become chief executive of the new company while Gary Parsons, the chairman of XM, would remain in that role."
Wonder when they will announce price increases?
I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
A more interesting merger than XM and SIRIUS, is really now Howard Stern and Opie & Anthony being on the same network.
Can one satellite network handle two (well three) giant egos.
Let's find out.
-Teiresias
XM and Sirius have never been profitable. They have both lost hundreds of millions of dollars since their inception. So what good is a merger?
As a huge O&A/Ron & Fez fan, I hope that the new company gets rid of some of the redundant stations (do we need 4 Top 20 stations?) and allocate more bandwidth to new stations. Maybe the Hideout boys and Ron & Fez get their own station while The Virus goes 24/7 O&A. Every time Ron and Fez mention "big things" for their show, ELo (Eric Logan) mentions the bandwidth issue.
Also, as a Big XII Alumni (Baylor,) hopefully they'll give us an option to start listening to Sirius content on XM. Oh, and there is that little league called the NFL.
I'm also curious to see how Opie and Anthony live working umnder the same umbrella as Howard Stern. Time will tell.
What, me Tweet?
Exactly. Monopolies in and of themselves are not illegal. Antitrust laws make it unlawful to maintain or attempt to create a monopoly through tactics that either unreasonably exclude firms from the market, or significantly impair their ability to compete.
Or the addition of commercials? I've never subscribed to either, but I thought one of the services still ran commercials (maybe it's Sirius because I think Stern reads them on-air) even though you were paying money for them.
It will be interesting to see if the non-commercial-running service stays that way.
I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
I was wondering about that too. They either are so desperate for a merger that they'll take their chances with the FCC, or they've already talked with Martin and convinced him that it won't be anticompetitive.
Who knows, they may succeed in framing the competition issue as one applying to the streamed audio market, which encompasses radio, Internet radio, and sat radio. When discussing broadband, the FCC frequently defines the market rather broadly, incorporating dish access into the discussion, as if it is a serious market participant. Given their generally broad interpretation of communications markets, they (or at least Martin, Tate, and McDowell) may buy the argument.
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
I guess the check finally cleared.
Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
While it seems like a nice solution, your limitation is of the music (content) you "own" and the space avilable on your server. Sirius and XM both offer different types of music, talk radio, sports radio, live music play, etc. I don't subscribe to either service -yet- but this definately appeals to me. I have a CD collection spanning 250+ CDs I've purchased. Its nice to listen to different music. And its cheaper than buying new CDs. Don'tcha think?
Yeah I have to agree with your other replier. Thats great that you don't find a need for satellite radio (I mean it saves you money right?) but others of us have a good need for it. First off the truckers and professional drivers who are looking for consistent radio coverage no matter where they are driving. But ontop of that those of us looking for specific niche channels. Howard Stern fans, Opie and Anthony fans... general sports fans (for instance you can probably get all of your local sports team's games on your local radio, but what if you like a out-of-state team, or you like listening to any game possible). There are comedy channels (24/7 stand-up routines), news channels (CNN, CNN Headline, FoxNews, BBC WorldNews). Satellite really does offer up a lot of options for those not only interested in music.
In terms of music-only listening I think you make a great point, but satellite offers much more than just music.
Remember "PayTV"?
Back in the day here in Canada, the first cable companies called their service "PayTV", no commercials.
It was advertised that commercials were necessary for each network to pay for their broadcasting charges in maintaining towers and whatnot.
But soon enough, they saw money.
And the same will happen to Satellite Radio.
As a Sirius subscriber, I'm a bit worried what a merger, if approved, might bring. They mention a more a la carte selection of channels. I read this as "tiered" pricing. If I had to guess, it sounds like it will be more modeled after the pay-for-tv pricing...i.e. you get a basic package for x dollars, a premium packages for y dollars, oh and you want the sports package? thats an extra z dollars. If it goes that route, I'm really going to have to reconsider if it is really worth it to me. Overall I've been happy with the Sirius service and choice of programming they've had. All for one price keeps it simple and affordable. Any changes to that, which are bound to happen in a merger like this, chances are the consumer loses.
As a cost-saving measure, dealmakers also negotiated the absorption of all world governments into OmniCorp, making the corporate behemoth the sole ruler of mankind.
Communism: The Endgame of Capitalism
Don't they operate on similar bands though? How hard would it be to build a dual-protocol receiver now that they're merged? I assume the reason it hasn't been done before is because neither company will license their stuff to anybody who builds a dual protocol box.
I read the internet for the articles.
There will continue to be a market for Sat radio as there continues to be a market for local broadcast radio. Your Tb of home-stored mp3's and movies won't tell you why people are meeting in town to discuss tonight's city council meeting, who died today, the status of rain, or what those fire engines were at 2 in the morning. They won't show you things you don't already know. Sure, you can get those things from the 'net in other ways, but many people like it this way, and the media is flexible to find new folks who like it in a slightly different way that it can accomodate.
Things don't die out as much as they thin out because of increased choices.
Great, so Fred and Fungus (my favorite XM stations) will probably be shitcanned in favor of the inferior counterparts on Sirious. Isn't that how these mergers work? Pay more, get less!
Really? My life does not revolve around finding new music and programming it into my iPod. I listen to Sat Radio so I don't have to do that. Plus, I get comedy, talk, and a lot of other programming that have no or less ads.
Not all of us are tied to our iPods by our nose.
If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
I subscribe to Sirius because it takes the work out of finding new music. I can put on a station that I like, tag the songs I especially like, and then every so often, download a track or buy a CD from one of the artists I found.
Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
"Yes, I do have an ipod loaded to the gills with music, but to be frank, without Satellite, I wouldn't have any NEW content to keep me awake."
:)
Exactly. Even a 30 gig MP3 collection can sometimes get boring if there is never anything new added.
How to find new stuff to add? Good question, and in my case, XM is the answer. Usually every time I drive somewhere in my car, by the time I'm home there's something new I want to get.
Which reminds me, I need to hunt a track down.
retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?