Slashdot Mirror


Telecom Refunds $8 Million for Bad Service

Gearu writes in with an article about a hefty refund coming to New Zealanders. It opens, "Telecom New Zealand has admitted it made an error with its Go Large broadband plan and is to credit customers of the service. An internal technical review of the service, launched in October, identified an issue with how internet traffic was being managed on the plan. The Go Large plan was promoted as having traffic management applied to certain applications, but since December the traffic management process had affected all forms of activity. With around 60,000 customers on the Go Large service, the refunds were expected to total $7.5 million to $8.5 million."

57 comments

  1. If only... by kerashi · · Score: 1

    If only they'd give us refunds for bad service here in the US...

    1. Re:If only... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Hey at least you have some competition. Here in Canada GSM is provided by Rogers. That's it. And your DSL? By bell [or a reseller which is the same thing].

      Go monopoly, the game the whole country can play!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:If only... by gripen40k · · Score: 2, Informative

      DSL is also provided by Telus out west, and they are slowly moving east as they expend their service. I'm not sure how they compare to Bell, but they aren't too bad in my mind. You could also go for cable, which is about the same price. Shaw provides it out here, not sure who does that in eastern Canada, but I know there has got to be one or two out there.

      --
      Har?
  2. AT&T, Cingular, etc. by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

    Somehow I doubt you'll ever see any of the major US carriers make such an unsolicited refund.

    1. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. They'd only begin to think about doing it if they lost a court case. And even then, they'd make every effort not to do anything at all. Ahhh, the good old "free hand of the market" at work...

    2. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by MaximvsG · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I think they cover their bases pretty good with so many disclaimers in your contract. Ever listen to a 30 second radio spot, 20 seconds for advertisement - 10 seconds for disclaimers. OK, exaggerating there but you get the gist of it. One of the disclaimers I don't like is speeds may vary and not responsible for speeds. I you buy DSL advertised at 3MB/768mb and only get half that speed, you should get some kind of a monthly discount.

    3. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, the good old "free hand of the market" at work...


            Monopolies are by no means free markets. And since you probably only have one (at most two) local broadband provider(s), you are in a de facto monopoly/oligopoly situation. What makes it a monopoly is the fact you can only have so many cables per telephone pole. Wireless would change this, but obviously these internet companies fight that idea with everything they have...it would erode their natural monopoly situation.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that my comment can be applied to just about any field at all, not just telecommunications.

    5. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my area what makes it a monopoly is municipalities signing exclusive agreements with only one provider of cable and one provider of telephone in return for a great deal on services for the city. Problem is, our city has both Comcast and AT&T (the current long-term monopolies) pissed about the consumer side of things, so we "residential customers" don't get squat for our $$$ compared to the surrounding communities. And, it seems whomever we vote into local office gets corrupted really quickly...but I digress.

    6. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      The whole thing is being investigated by the Commerce Commission, so, this is hardly an unsolicited refund. It's more of a pre-emptive refund to defuse things, really; while it won't excuse them from the investigation, it does take away a lot of the investigation's momentum.

      --
      =w=
    7. Re:AT&T, Cingular, etc. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      This *isn't* a random act of charity. The Commerce Commission has started an investigation into Telecom for misleading advertising. This is a preemptive act to stave off harsher penalties.

      Telecom have severely retarded internet growth in NZ.

  3. Yet another reason... by Warshadow · · Score: 1

    I have to think about moving to NZ. Honest businesses.

    1. Re:Yet another reason... by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I thought this was just another example of internet mob activism (which /. covered a few days ago). However,

      "In this instance with the Go Large plan our internal technical review showed we had made an error and we believe that we are doing the right thing by crediting customers."

      Internal review? I think you are right. But what initiated this review?

      "The Commerce Commission is also investigating after receiving complaints the service was not delivering what was promised."

      Hard to tell here one way or the other, but I tend to agree with you -- maybe since it's the weekend and my corporate boom stick is getting waxed right now. I dunno. But let's give these guys a pass for now, shall we?

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:Yet another reason... by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to think about moving to NZ. Honest businesses.

      NZ Telecom and "honest business" don't really go together. Telecom have done everything they can to try and lock out (including quite an impressive history of dirty tricks) any competition and have held back broadband in NZ years and years (it's even worse than US broadband - until recently 256K connections were considered high end). Things are opening up to compeition now though, so I think Telecom is facing the fact that once competition becomes widely available they're going to face a country-wide customer revolt unless they can do something to try and restore some semblance of reputation. This move is basically that - the realisation that they better refund people for having fucked them over for years lest they all move to the competition.
    3. Re:Yet another reason... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, just prior to Christmas before all these Go Large problems started, I was getting 3mbit/s nicely. After Christmas I was getting only 700-1500kbit/s with big pauses in traffic. Watching online TV nearly impossible for the last two months! My phonecalls to Xtra regarding slow speeds were futile. When I suggested that I might switch to TelstraClear Cable Internet because of faster upload speeds and a much snappier web experience, the tech said that it was probably a good idea because Telecom has totally screwed their Xtra broadband system. They have been hammered by complains and cannot cope with the sheer volume of them!

      In the midst of the trouble, one tech told me:
      (a). That traffic management, while ready to go, it had not been implemented/enforced yet, so bandwidth issues were not related to that system.
      (b). For some strange reason, other plans were not affected (which seems to conflict with (a)), so he recommended changing to another -more expensive- plan.

      BUT, today and yesterday my speed is back up to 3mbit/s and things are snappy again. All this bad publicity might have forced a configuration change on their system? So either they have removed/disabled the traffic management system, fixed some issues at the exchange, or a heap of people have dumped Xtra in my area. Anyways, today I am happy. Refunding customers will serve Telecom right.

    4. Re:Yet another reason... by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1
      I am one of those customers of Telecom NZ who will get the refund. I have been unhappy for weeks now after signing up for "Go Large". The original "Go Large" plan was accompanied by a document explaining their traffic management policies. The traffic management policy specified certain types of traffic that would be managed and other types of traffic would not be managed. Their error was to have managed all traffic, contrary to their stated policy.

      But instead of changing the service to match the policy they stated, they have revised the policy to match what they have been doing. I think that sucks.

    5. Re:Yet another reason... by h2jones · · Score: 1

      I live in Auckland and moved from a 2mb down/192kb up plan to this go large plan. Actually I was given no choice as Xtra are no longer grandparenting any old plans. Effectively this meant a drop in upload speed to 128kb and potentially up to 6-7mb down. My experience of their service got progressively worse from day one - drop outs, horrific latency, it really was all over the scale, no consistency in speed or reliability and average speed was between 30kb to 1mb. I use vpn to work when I am on call but it became unusable from home. Anyway I changed ISP after calling xtra help and being told that everything looks fine with my connection and they wont be doing anything about it, and now I get 7mb down/768kb up for about the same price. Most Kiwi's tend not to complain, they just quietly do something about it. Telecom/Xtra are crapping themselves as they are going to be forced to offer naked dsl soon, when that happens many people will quietly do something about telecoms monopoly by moving to voip and not paying line rental anymore. Its already starting, at work we use a voip connector and it is saving us money.

    6. Re:Yet another reason... by brucehoult · · Score: 1

      When I suggested that I might switch to TelstraClear Cable Internet because of faster upload speeds and a much snappier web experience

      If you like somewhere that you have that choice then you're very lucky. And you should do it. The 4 Mbps down/2 Mbps up service is the best value in internet in NZ today, assuming that you a) actually do use the internet, and b) aren't leeching things 24/7. Get the $50 10 GB/month plan if you're going to use anywhere between 6.7 GB and 16.7 GB a month. And note that that is the *total* cost -- there's no hidden cost in having to have a $35/month phone line as well before you can even order broadband, as is the case with Telecom's DSL.

      Or if you're one of those strange people who actually wants to have a landline then TelstraClear only add on $20/month for that, so compared to Telecom you're effectively getting the internet for $35 or so.

    7. Re:Yet another reason... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. TelstraClear told me last time that I asked, that you couldn't get Cable TV or Broadband Internet without also paying for a landline with them. Maybe they should update their prices. I see that they now have a "PDQ" service that is not listed here.

    8. Re:Yet another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stayed in Wellington (capital of NZ for the geographically challenged) for three months on business in 2005 and used one of the wireless providers (Woosh?) because I knew I didn't want Telecom getting their dirty dirty hands on my credit card info.

      The speed wasn't fantastic (about 1/3rd of my 512 ADSL in Brisbane) - but it sure beat dialup.

      And when I left the country they were quite happy to cancel the 1000 year contract that I'd signed up for. (I did have to fork out about NZD$200 (~USD$120) for hardware initially).

      The only technical problems I had they were unable to help with, but when you use a Mac you kind of expect that... :D
      (And were solved by resetting the packet size (1584 bytes or some similarly weird number) and/or waving the extended antennae around near the window to get better reception)

      The disappointing part was not being able to use the wireless hardware in Brisbane, Perth or Melbourne, since every wireless company in the south pacific seems to have their own way of doing things.

  4. NZD 8 1/2 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is something like USD 42?

    1. Re:NZD 8 1/2 million by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      42 million? Hmm, 42. 42? Where have I heard that number before?

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  5. My reading management process must be affected... by frakir · · Score: 1
    It is amazing how one can write whole page of text without any information (besides that customers on the plan will be credited).

    Go Large was promoted as having traffic management applied to certain applications, but since December the traffic management process had affected all forms of activity.
    Can someone enlighten me what was it supposed to do and how it failed?
  6. Re:My reading management process must be affected. by sokoban · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that they were trying to institute dl/ul speed caps on only certain types of traffic (probably BT, servers, and other P2P), but they ended up capping all the traffic instead due to an error.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  7. our bad? by caluml · · Score: 1

    from the whoops-our-bad dept.

    Just out of interest, what is the etymology of "my/our bad"? Our bad what? Mistake?

    1. Re:our bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sometimes the department names get on my chimes too.

    2. Re:our bad? by torqer · · Score: 4, Informative

      google + keywords etymology my bad returns my bad/it's my bad - "It's my fault/mistake" (an acknowledgement of blame) - this is from US college/university campus 1980's slang, in which 'bad' means mistake or fault (that caused a bad thing), hence 'it's my bad', or more succinctly, 'my bad'. It's simply a shortening of 'The bad thing that happened was my fault, sorry'. The word bad in this case has evolved to mean 'mistake which caused a problem'. It's another example of the tendency for language to become abbreviated for more efficient (and stylised) communications. In this case the abbreviation is also a sort of teenage code, which of course young people everywhere use because they generally do not wish to adopt lifestyle and behaviour advocated by parents, teachers, authority, etc., and so develop their own style and behaviour, including language. For new meanings of words to evolve there needs to be a user-base of people that understands the new meanings. Initially the 'my bad' expression was confined to a discrete grouping, ie., US students, and the meaning wasn't understood outside of that group. Now it seems the understanding and usage of the 'my bad' expression has grown, along with the students, and entered the mainstream corporate world, no doubt because US middle management and boardrooms now have a high presence of people who were teenagers at college or university 20 years ago. I am also informed (ack K Korkodilos) that the 'my bad' expression was used in the TV series 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer', and that this seems to have increased its popular mainstream usage during the 1990's, moreover people using the expression admitted to watching the show when asked about the possible connection. Additionally (ack M Woolley) apparently the 'my bad' expression is used by the Fred character in the new (2006) Scooby Doo TV series, which is leading to the adoption of the phrase among the under-5's in London, and logically, presumbly, older children all over England too. There is it seems no stopping this one..

    3. Re:our bad? by theGreater · · Score: 1

      See also: mea culpa.

      -theGreater.

  8. In Turkey, YOU refund telecom by unity100 · · Score: 1

    - thats no joke - it actually is so - the single monopoly backbone provider (turkish telecom) has recently oversold adsl packages, and our download speeds are cut to 1/3 or so, with horrible 500 ms ping latency to europe. Yet, we still pay the same fee. If you go for a refund here in turkey, you get beaten and thrown out. Companies refunding customers is something that is not this country is accustomed to.

    1. Re:In Turkey, YOU refund telecom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only that only happened in turkey.

        When I was still in College at RMC there was a contract awarded for existing Ethernet cabling in the dorms to a company called Alpha Telecom. The company was very shady and headed by a complete asshole. He refused to increase bandwidth and was running only a single 3mb line to the college through a single router. Everything was fine when only a few of us had returned to school but once the school was in full swing everything ground to a halt.

      The Alpha Telecom voicemail was useless as it was always filled with complaints. The owner refused to be reasonable and rather than buy multiple lines and split the dorms up into different systems he just bought a series of different magic routers that would instantly fix the problem. The last router was a Cisco which was much better than the others because it would auto reboot every time it was overwhelmed and shut down.

      Alpha Telecom not only refused to give refunds but they also refused to let people quit. I called and said I wanted to discontinue service but they kept charging my credit card anyway. 2 months later when I contacted mastercard they told me that they required written notice (which wasn't spelled out anywhere in the contract.) Some students had paid up front for the entire year and received no money back.

      The worst part was the attitude of the man who owned the company. He wanted a monopoly on our business so he kept asking that we contract him as a group to manage our network, when we all wanted to just pay for broadband individually. When things didn't go his way he just acted like he was only responsible to try and provide access to the school and had no obligation to provide access to any individuals.

      Some students made a prank call to the owner's mother offering her service from Beta Telecom claiming that she could receive absolutely nothing at lower cost (the owner called the military police who handled the situation reasonably, as no laws were broken and after all, if laws had been broken it would have been a matter for the civilian police, the owner just wanted to scare the cadets involved.) In the end Alpha Telecom went bankrupt and I can only hope that it was a sole proprietorship so that it took that asshole down with it. Liars cheaters and thieves deserve such fates... what was I replying to again?

    2. Re:In Turkey, YOU refund telecom by unity100 · · Score: 1

      this reply page took 8-12 seconds to load.

      well,

      in turkey, the national, single backbone provider is asshole. actually it is owned by an asshole that lives in germany, despite being turkish. he robs turkish people to pay for the installments of the sum he bought turkish telekom from the government for.

      even assholes like you describe are in a fit here in turkey. because all have to use the single backbone. at least, when you get out of school, you are able to choose your provider.

  9. Sweet by Ikyaat · · Score: 0

    That would be $2 for every person in the country!

    --
    "Luck is a tag given by the mediocre to account for the accomplishments of genius." -Heinlein
  10. $8 Million!? Nice. by EatingSteak · · Score: 2, Funny

    8 million bucks. That should come out to just about .002 cents per person. Or maybe .002 dollars. Whatever, same thing.

  11. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by torqer · · Score: 3, Informative

    $8,000,000 by 60,000 subscribers... $133 per person (or 13300 cents)

  12. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by mabinogi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
    The entire population of New Zealand is only around 4 Million.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  13. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by EatingSteak · · Score: 1

    That wasn't meant to be a literal calculation. More of a reference to bad telecom service. Guess I should have included link in original post.

  14. Telco Refunds by Kawerau · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please note the following is my personal opinion and the facts when they finally come out may be slightly different: Telecom NZ was originally a state owned entity that was deregulated. Once operating as a private company they aggresivly defended their monopoly position (they owned all the copper to residences) to achieve the best return for shareholders possible. They did this successfully and became the largest single company on the NZ sharemarket. In the course of their aggresive business tactics they did however do their best to extract maximum value from their customers with minimum outlay. In the area of broadband this meant placing the minimum amount of equipment in their exchanges to deal with the customer load. This was achieved through the sale of limited speed/bandwith plans and high but undisclosed contention ratios. Telecom also defended their policies to legislators using FUD and standover tactics, however late last year the government anounced that the telecom industry was going to me more tightly regulated and the local loop unbundled. As part of the process and to try and attract a greater future market share telecom announced several improved broadband plans, including the go-large plan which was uncapped on both speed and bandwith. Unfortunately in many areas this meant that with the existing high contention ratio many users slowed to less than dial-up speeds. After high profile complaints and reports Telecom announced the refund you hear about. This is not something i would have expected from the 'old' telecom and is an encouraging sign. However due to their history i strongly believe that if they did not make this move voluntarily then they would have been forced into something similar by the NZ commerce commision. This is, i believe, telecom making the best of a bad PR situation. For a good example of telecoms attitude to its customers and their feelings in return see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGrKLNnGfZY Finally telecoms excuse for the problem was that traffic shaping bandwidth control that was supposed to be applied to P2P or similar loads was accidentally missaplied to all traffic. This will be proven i guess when they correct that mistake and we will see if users do get full speed.

    1. Re:Telco Refunds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's add to the history. In order to stop the new US owners of Telecom NZ removing a tradition of free local calling, the government of the day made maintaining this policy a rule of the sale; the Kiwi Share. Ever since, the management of our telecom incumbent has tried ever way of screwing every last penny out of us to send to their American owners, including ripping us off in the new world of ADSL Internet access.

      Telecom NZ is the only advertisement necessary for why small nations need to protect their strategic services from foreign investors, regulate such industries and separate carriers from service providers.

      This refund is a desperate effort by Telecom NZ to save some customer base in the face of new competition that it is now only allowing to stave off threaten new legislation.

    2. Re:Telco Refunds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As part of the process and to try and attract a greater future market share telecom announced several improved broadband plans, including the go-large plan which was uncapped on both speed and bandwith Not quite. They'd like you to think it was uncapped, but there is no such thing as a free lunch. As of the introduction of the "Go Large" plan it was subject to the following conditions:

      1) 128kbps capped upload speed -- Not really fast enough to do anything useful with the connection, certainly slow enough to throttle the claimed ~7Mbps download speeds.
      2) 700MB data cap for the 8 hours between 4pm and midnight, aka "Peak time", infringements in two consecutive days subject to being thrown into an even more heavily traffic shaped data pool for a period of a week. This appears to have since been removed from the terms and conditions.
    3. Re:Telco Refunds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telecom NZ was originally a state owned entity that was deregulated.
      You've misunderstood: Telecom NZ was a state owned entity that was privatised.
    4. Re:Telco Refunds by Zugok · · Score: 1
      Some other interesting details:
      • Theresa Gattung, the boss of Telecom recently announced her resignation
      • ADSL2+ will be rolled out next month in the district of Pakuranga; this is the residence of Opposition Shadow Minister of Communications, Maurice Williamson
      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    5. Re:Telco Refunds by Kawerau · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right, my bad :P Thank you for the correction

  15. More details on the plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who don't know the Go Large plan is an all-you-can-eat plan. This is unusual for NZ as most plans have some form of download & upload limit per month. Also, the plan was added after Telecom upgraded the national speed of adsl to 8MBit downstream and 512kbits upstream (though varies depending on distance from exchange and other factors).

    The idea behind the plan that would make it work, was that download applications such as torrents would be throttled in some way. This is necessary, otherwise people on this plan are likely create a very heavy load, and degrade the service for others by using up all the pipe at their exchange - or possibly further upstream.
    Also if ones data usage (upload & download combined) exceeds 700MBytes during peak times, you get heavier speed restrictions for a week or so.

    The plan was advertised with details of these restrictions. From the article is appears that rather than restricting just torrents so forth, they restricted everything.
    From memory the plan costs 49.95$NZ a month, so that puts the credit into perspective.

    People in NZ often complain that Telecom has too much dominance in the market, but Telecom does have a pretty good track record for crediting if things go wrong.
    My impression is that laws protecting the consumer in NZ are fairly strict on an international level.
    The government has recently started making moves to regulate broadband service in NZ, so perhaps Telecom is being particularly proactive here to reduce the chance of being hit by a regulatory stick again.

    1. Re:More details on the plan by Warshadow · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded down? It's a pretty good informational post.

    2. Re:More details on the plan by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      It wasn't modded down, it was posted by Anonymous Coward, so it starts with 0 points. You must be new here (although your id number is pretty low).

      --
      So say we all
  16. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by Der+Reiseweltmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

    Haha Verizon math. But seriously, what telecom has between 4 and 400 billion customers?

  17. Re:My reading management process must be affected. by Zugok · · Score: 1

    Go Large was a DSL plan where for $50/month, you would have download speeds as fast as your line can handle and an unlimited monthly data allowance, however if users consistently exceeded x M/GB between y and z hours, (I forget the numbers as I was not a customer of the plan), then Telecom would request that you move to another plan which would make them more money (presumably).

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  18. Go Large itself was flawed by dafing · · Score: 1
    The plan, Go Large, giving unlimited access was flawed from the start. I would get so angry when I saw the ads on television, they have a gimicky "Geek Squad" that rolls around in a pimped out van (that can fly, see Back To The Future 2) solving New Zealands internet problem. The thing was that Telecom has always been our problem.

    What really got to me was when they were watching a typical family on their view screen in the batcave, (Telecom and Big Brother are pretty similar actually) and they had maxed out their bandwidth allowance for the month. They speak (voice coming through the family computers speakers or something) and push a big red knob to "Go Large". Its all "New Zealand, you've been held back too long, now Telecom is giving you everything you need" despite the fact they are the ones calling 256k fast broadband.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  19. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by dafing · · Score: 1

    The entire population of New Zealand is only around 4 Million.

    You insensitive clod! Republic of the Congo only has 3.999 Million!

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  20. 4 millions - more than enough! by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

    > Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
    > The entire population of New Zealand is only
    > around 4 Million.

    4 millions of persons are more than enough. Any more than that and it will start to get crowded.

    It is nice to be able to walk down a main street in a town and find the car (sic) stopping because you look like you want to cross the street.

    That was my experience in Greymouth (on the West Coast of the South Island).

  21. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    Funniest thread I've read in a long time. You have to love the moderators. They either have a great sense of humor (they modded him informative instead of funny) or they totally misunderstand. Kudos to all of you, especialy the faithful slashdotter who responded to the OP. Have a great day :D

  22. Re:My reading management process must be affected. by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the crappy 128kbit upstream limit. Some customers didn't get a say, their old plans were discontinued and they were bumped onto the new plan. I lost my 192kbit upstream when I was bumped off my old plan onto the craptastic Go Large.

  23. Awarded the Supreme Consumer Complete Ass Award by grolschie · · Score: 2, Informative

    The NZ Consumer Supreme "I really don't give an ass" Award went to Telecom's Xtra this year.

    Xtra have had a history of poor perforance.

  24. Re:$8 Million!? Nice. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    After a few more mergers (Verizon, Quest, Rogers) I'm sure "at&t" will.

  25. You man... by kokoba · · Score: 1

    USD what-you get-if-you-multiply-six-by-nine

  26. NZ Telecom by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    There was nothing unsolicited about this! Thousands of complaints over many months. Many articles in the national papers about pathetic "Go Large" plan: many users experiencing 30 secodn delays before pages STAR loading, NO email, and transfer rates less than 10KB/s.

    No - there was a MAJOR move against Telecom for a long time. The Telecommunications ombudsman was involved, and so was the Commerce Commission by way of the Telecommunications Commissioner and his department.

    Telecom was FORCED into this. Nothing could be less like NZ Telecom than to give away money it doesn't have to. And, they HAD to.

    Thankfully, I'm on their "Unconstrained" plan with 40 GB a month for $119.90 - but my upstream and downstream is limited only by the machines I connect with. I regularly see transfer rates in excess of 600Kb/s upstream and on a good server, I'll see better than 5Mb/s downstream, averaged over a 2GB file. No complaints about my connection - except how fucking pricey it is!

    But they need all the money they can get: the CVD (Chief Value Destroyer) Theresa Gattung (ex-CEO, now CVD) is leaving with a multimillion dollar handshake, despite overseeing 2.5 billion dollars lost (stolen) from shareholders funds. The fact she stood at the Telecom Boardroom table for more than 5 years, with her fingers in her ears shouting "I CAN'T HEAR YOU! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" over and over again, while the government shouted "Open Up or Be Legislated against" can't be more clear. She ignored the warnings, lost Mom-and-Pop investors many many hundreds of millions of dollars, and what does she get in return? Tar and feathers, and a blacklist for any CEO job ever? NO - she takes 5 million in cash, and laughs all the way to the bank.

    Fucking bitch.

    I would have fucked Telecom's users and shareholders over for a LOT less than that.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"