Slashdot Mirror


Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops

WSJdpatton writes "The much-hyped notion that Linux would be a viable alternative to Windows to run desktop and notebook PCs for corporate users seemed dead on arrival a few years ago. But the idea is showing some new vital signs as companies look for cheaper alternatives to Microsoft products. The Wall Street Journal outlines several firms that are reaping savings and stability on their workplace desktops by rolling out Linux distributions. 'Auto maker PSA Peugeot Citroën last month said it will start using Linux on 20,000 of its workers' PCs. Novell Inc., which sells a version of Linux and is supplying it to Peugeot, says it has recently signed up several large U.S. financial institutions that are installing Linux on some employee PCs. Sales of Linux PCs are showing a really nice uptick at Novell, says Ronald Hovsepian, chief executive of Novell.' Not everyone is a convert, though. 'The State of Illinois recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'"

61 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    'The State of Illinois recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'

    Apparently, they don't have time for security either...

    1. Re:Don't have time by randall_burns · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What do you expect from a state where dead people voting is a cherished local tradition?

    2. Re:Don't have time by GoMMiX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, it's amazing Linux has the adoption level and interest that it does given the influence a corporation the size of MS has. Really, it wouldn't be surprising to see MS spend hundreds of millions on lobbying and campaign donations.

      MS also donates software (and otherwise, I'm sure) heavily in districts where people of political influence reside.

      It's sad, but I don't question that a good level of MS support in the government is simply bought - one way or another.

      Mr. Campbell would be wise to word his MS preference carefully, as the voters of Illinois' citizens may feel their tax dollars should go to science projects that could save them tens of millions. Monies that could be put to good use for education in low income areas, real estate I'm well aware Illinois has in great abundance.

    3. Re:Don't have time by SnowZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard that dead people prefer genuine Microsoft Windows(tm) to Linux by almost 4:1.

    4. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. It's a also a massive paradigm shift in formats and IT training. The statement is totally valid- corporations have the resources to interopt alternative workstations into their network in order to try things out and make a shift. State governments don't have time for BS. Microsoft's out of the box solution for them likely has been working and will continue to- they are probably correct that it's cheaper for them than Linux.

      Windows Server has been gaining popularity lately with good cause- it's a product that's quickly improving.

    5. Re:Don't have time by nagora · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand.

      Frankly, compared to Microsoft, pretty well any alternative is a magical security wand.

      State governments don't have time for BS.

      If only...

      Windows Server has been gaining popularity lately with good cause- it's a product that's quickly improving.

      I've been hearing that tune since Windows 2.0 came out. Lost interest long ago.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    6. Re:Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. It's a also a massive paradigm shift in formats and IT training.

      Windows isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. [Securing] Windows is also a massive paradigm shift in... IT training.

    7. Re:Don't have time by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      More evidence that WGA is not for the customer, because in many cases in Illinois, the customer is dead.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    8. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is this the same person??

        CMS DIRECTOR RESIGNS
      SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) -- The head of a powerful Illinois government agency resigned today after a sometimes-rocky tenure.

      Paul Campbell's resignation from the Department of Central Management Services takes effect immediately. He had been director for nearly two years and was assistant director before that.

      A spokesman said Campbell will become a vice president at United Health Care.

      Central Management Services is the agency in charge of most state purchasing and hiring. Its influence has expanded under Governor Rod Blagojevich (blah-GOY'-uh-vich).

      But state auditors have repeatedly found management problems there, from paying improper expenses to overstating the results of cost-cutting.

      The agency's hiring procedures have also been scrutinized amid questions about whether Blagojevich has awarded jobs based on politics.

    9. Re:Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Decent IT departments have no problems with MS.

      Decent IT departments have no problems with Linux either.

    10. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I also wonder how much Microsoft paid them. check out this link for more of the same. Another Story with Paul Campbell

    11. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 4, Insightful


      All of which is bullshit because the moron at the Illinois state office said, "We don't have time for science projects..." - which is a clear demonstration that he has no clue what he's talking about when it comes to Linux and therefore isn't a competent IT person.

      The bottom line for any IT department should be just that - the bottom line. And Windows is KNOWN and DEMONSTRATED by industry statistics for being detrimental to the bottom line because of the costs of licensing, the cost of unreliabiliy and downtime, the cost of insecurity, the cost of complexity, and the cost of vendor lock-in compared to UNIX in general and Linux in particular.

      COMPETENT IT organizations will choose that software which over time will be cheaper to own and operate. Training costs are a small part of that effort - and would not be a problem had not INCOMPETENT IT organizations chosen to lock themselves into Microsoft products.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    12. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's irrelevant in this case

      If it's irrelevant, then why did you feel the need to make it a point in the first place?

      The point is that solid IT is the difference between a secure system and an insecure system, not the OS.

      Oh right, because the OS that a system is running has absolutely NOTHING to do with the security of the system...
      In case you've been absent, the initial point was that there's no case to switch. If Illinois was switching from paper and typewriters to computers, we might have a situation where going with Linux could potentially be cheaper.

      The point about OS security should not be taken out of context. Within reason, linux and windows are basically secure if implemented properly in an enterprise environment. Just because a fair share of home Windows users like to go on wild clicking sprees and download everything in sight does not make the OS less secure- there just happens to be more idiots using it, since it's more common. My company is entirely run on Microsoft-based servers and workstations internationally and we've yet to have any major security issues or virus outbreaks. I'm fairly sure the "Linux is more secure" argument would fade away if the system ever became dominant... you know, if Hell freezes over.
    13. Re:Don't have time by Hymer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no... it is the other way around... they don't have the time 'cause the need it for fixing all those security issues in an all Windows environment...
      ...they should propably look at the consequncies... f.ex. a Norwegian bank has just been down FOR ALLMOST A WHOLE WEEK... 11.000 PC's and 1.000+ servers got the Win32/Viking.gt (Normann AV) aka. W32/HLLP.Philis.ha (McAfee) worm and they just couldn't clean it. I can't find anything in english about this case, there are two stories about it in the danish Computerworld but they are of course in danish initial story from March 5 follow up on March 8.

    14. Re:Don't have time by MechaShiva · · Score: 3, Informative

      "State governments don't have time for BS. Microsoft's out of the box solution for them likely has been working and will continue to- they are probably correct that it's cheaper for them than Linux"

      As a state employee, I can assure you we have the time.

      On a more serious note, MS solutions certainly don't work right out of the box. They take a fair amount of massaging and coercing to get them to operate in a mostly functional way. Is Linux a drop-in replacement? By no means. Is it a feasible replacement? Absolutely. And figuring that state governments have huge contracts with whatever vendor they work with, getting the vendor's assistance on porting related issues might be a more reasonable expectation.

      --
      After calming me down with some orange slices and some fetal spooning, E.T. revealed to me his singular purpose.
    15. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 3, Insightful


      No, industry studies have proven that using COMPUTERS WITH SOME OS gets things done faster and cheaper over paper and pencil. The fact that the only OS studied was Windows is not relevant.

      And you can't compare an OS that has had hardware vendor lock-in for the last fifteen years - and was the ONLY available cheap OS (DOS) for ten years previous to that - with an OS that only became usable in the last five or so.

      That says nothing about which OS is better NOW. It also doesn't say anything about the excessive costs of the Microsoft approach.

      Linux can facilitate a lot of low-cost common denominator products just as well as Windows - once people realize that the OSS development model is just as good as the commercial development model (and Linux can use the commercial model just as well as Windows, in any event.)

      It simply hasn't reached critical mass yet to do so - and that is because of vendor and corporate inertia encouraged by Microsoft with their contracts, their glad-handling sales reps, and their pseudo-monopoly status.

      The point is, to paraphrase Microsoft, where do corporation want to go? To more vendor lock-in, insecurity, unreliabiliy, and expense - or change the terms of engagement and try a different approach which is already demonstrating its feasibility in large-scale deployments?

      Do corporations really want to make Bill Gates richer while getting nothing but headaches in return, or do thsy want to get on with THEIR business and put some of that saved money into THEIR business?

      In the end, it really comes down to: is there ANYBODY in corporate management who has a clue?

      Oh, wait, never mind.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    16. Re:Don't have time by curecollector · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and if they can vote in elections, they can certainly vote with their wallets!

    17. Re:Don't have time by TrailerTrash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here in Illinois, we take the rights of Deceased Americans (formerly known as dead people) very seriously, including the right to vote. Many issues, such as elections of aldermen, are critically dependent on the outspoken support of Deceased Americans.

      The number of Deceased Americans is expected to grow to unimaginable proportions as time goes on, and so protecting their rights is important to do now.

      This is not to confused with Reanimated Americans (formerly known as zombies), who tend to be vocal almost exclusively on health care issues (notably, brains).

    18. Re:Don't have time by cmacb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me clarify- they shouldn't have time for BS. I'd rather the state government I pay taxes to use the more tried and trusted solution instead of using our infrastructure as a cultural software experiment. Less important states like Indiana or Iowa can do that.


      The remark "less important states" aside, we (Americans) would ALL like to know that our tax money was being spent wisely. But applying "tried and trusted" to Microsoft products seems a bit odd unless you are a Microsoft employee or are related to this Jefferson fellow. It is precisely the fact that Windows and office have been tried that leads so many people to the conclusion that they should no longer be trusted.

      How much would it cost to make one application run by the state web-based (I'm not talking about Internet, I'm talking about using a web browser for the user interface)? Such an application would not require the wholesale replacement of Windows desktops, but WOULD allow for selected replacement of some systems. Many "desktop" machines in government are not really desktop, they are really "countertop", sitting in locations where government people interact with citizens and run a single application all day long. Converting just one such system to web-based (or even Citrix based) would allow the client machines to be Windows, Linux, or anything else that supports a full blown web browser (or Citrix client). That could be thousands of Windows licenses saved right there, or if you decided the experiment hadn't worked, you could keep them running Windows.

      On the other hand if you don't even want that potential expense you could JUST focus on a relatively isolated group of true desktop systems and convert them to Linux and Open Office for some period of time.

      I say "experiment", but really, some of us know that the results are that in most cases, it works just fine. I used Linux and Open Office in an "all Microsoft" shop for several years and the only noticeable change was that people started coming to me whenever they were having trouble fixing a messed up Word document, a messed up floppy disk (with Word files on it) or needed to burn a CD that was reusable outside the organization (for some reason the standard configured machines could only produce coasters most of the time). My Word documents and Excels files (produced by Open Office) never caused any compatibility problems and I never had to worry about my e-mail archive being corrupted by Outlook bugs. Cost to government (feds) for this "experiment" = $0. Well, really the cost was a negative number, as the Word documents I rescued would have taken many hours to reproduce and the readable CDs I produced saved tons of delay in sending information out to other agencies.

      While I often characterize government workers as wasteful and lazy, there are pockets of enthusiasm for trying new and potentially better things. I have no doubt you could find departments with such people (even in the "important" state of Illinois) who would delight in trying a new OS/Office combo that would be much less susceptible to virus outbreaks and other malware. How many government workers would have loved to have a tabbed browser several years before Microsoft got around to it, or a machine that seemed to run about twice as fast due to less overhead that a properly installed Linux system has over Windows?

      Switching to Linux is no magic pill. The potential savings in hardware and software costs would only be a fraction of total government waste. On the other hand eliminating the obstacles to such an experiment (see posts below) might be the key to even more savings.
    19. Re:Don't have time by MrNormS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux isn't ready for the desktop. I have no problem admitting that. However, it is completely ready for my desktop. It just isn't ready for everyone's needs. My grandmother would have no more problem using Linux than using she does using Windows, as long as I set it all up for her. And don't be all "well you're a linux geek and you were needed set it up," as I also needed to set up her win95 machine that she used up until last year, and her XP machine she uses now. She lives in California... me in Canada, and regularly calls me to get me to explain her how to fix things. Here is where I could either use ssh to solve the problem or VNC to make guiding her easier. But no, she uses Windows due to fear of change (which she openly admits) and I'm stuck trying to guide her through "the printer thing" as her printer "doesn't want to do anything" and a "thing keeps popping up" telling her "something." On the other hand, there is lots of software missing for the Linux platform. Everyone quickly mentions games. Either way, I've been running Linux on the desktop since I was 16 and have never had a problem I couldn't solve with a little googling.

    20. Re:Don't have time by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Illinois is like Louisiana. Allegedly one of the Longs said, "I want to be buried in Louisiana, so that I can stay active in politics". When I lived there, I don't think they were able to elect a dead guy, but given that that constituency can only go up, it's only a matter of time. We'll also note that dead aldermen will be just as brave as live aldermen in acting independently of the mayor.

      I miss Illinois some days; it was corrupt, but it was competent corruption.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  2. The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am severely impressed with Illinois' capability of assessing a situation so quickly & flawlessly. They already claim an annual cost savings of U.S. $2.1 million [proprietarily locked DOC warning] for five years ($10.5 million total) by using Microsoft's technologies! Why am I impressed? Well, they didn't even have to try anything else out to discover this! If they did, this case study doesn't show any of it. That document (if you read it) only makes claims but backs it up with nothing. I laugh at the very idea of it being titled a "Case Study."

    You know, where I work, if you make a statement like "would save our company $10 million" you kind of need to make a business case. A large part of the business case is having micro experiments & demonstrations & data to present to back up your business case. In fact, it's a lot like the scientific process where you present facts that prove your argument. Granted, it's not required to be that rigorous but you usually have to get those to agree with you through this.

    If I were a tax paying Illini and that document was the only thing persuading me that my government should use Microsoft products, I would bitch. That's just me, though. I think precisely what this Joseph Campbell needs to do is a "science project" as he calls it. For some reason they're avoiding a "business science project" and I'm really questioning his motivation for circumventing that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. Ouch by Stephen+Tennant · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.

    I felt that one hit my balls.

    --
    I spend most of my time in bed, darling.
    1. Re:Ouch by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why, are you a scientist at one of the U. Illinois schools that is apparently closing down unexpectedly after this announcement?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  4. And we all know how efficient State Government is! by coolmoose25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even though I prefer Windows to Linux, it is not much of an endorsement when the uber-efficient State government endorses your products...

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  5. So that explains it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""We don't have time for science projects in state government,""

    That's why they never bothered to find out how so many dead people were able to vote in Chicago elections.

  6. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, where I work, if you make a statement like "would save our company $10 million" you kind of need to make a business case.

    You don't work for the government, do you?

  7. Science Projects? by andy314159pi · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We don't have time for science projects in state government,"
    They are too busy streamlining service at the DMV to install Linux.
  8. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they replaced "IBM Lotus Notes, Novell GroupWise, and Microsoft Exchange Server, with multiple versions of those systems in use" with a single state-wide Exchange site license. Once you factor in the licenses, admin salaries, and redundant servers, you might get to $2.1 million a year.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  9. Windows can be as secure as Linux by wiredog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

    1. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cutting the network cable doesn't count!

    2. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

      I disagree. For a normal person/environment, this is not the case. Out of the box, the average Linux distro is more secure than Windows Vista. If you put work into Vista you can make it about as secure from a technology perspective as the average Linux install, but you can't change the malware ecosystem which targets Windows more and presents it with more threats, making the overall risk on Windows greater. Also, for more secure, managed environments you can utilize SELinux or something that provides more fine grained control than Vista can offer in a usable environment unless you have access to the Windows source code, which normal people don't.

      So if you're aiming for a level of security that is sort of middle of the road, then you can (with extra work) get Windows to the same state as the average Linux install, but you'll still have a higher risk. Further, if you're aiming for something above and beyond that, Windows just can't achieve some of the security layers that Linux can, so it will always be a bit behind.

    3. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

      This is not even remotely true. Linux is inherently more secure than Windows by design, at least if the security-related features are actually used (and I'm not even referring to selinux, for which there is no Windows analogue.) And on top of that, security holes in Linux are typically fixed much faster.

      I do not agree that it is possible to make Windows as secure as Linux unless you're not even turning the Windows machine on. And even if it were true, with the same amount of effort put into both, you could still stay far out ahead with Linux.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows, when you're not running as Admnistrator, is easily just a 'secure' as Linux not running as root, for definitions of 'secure' that mean one user can't kill the whole system, and the Admin account is not compromised.

      When on fire you're just as secure as when you're not, for definitions of "secure" that mean you are unlikely to be hit by a russian nuclear device. Seriously, that's not a very reasonable definition of "secure" and even looking at that premise there is at least one outstanding, public privilege escalation in Vista right now and there almost always is in the current version of windows, while the same is not true on Linux. MS has never taken local escalations seriously.

      Windows has a big red 'X' painted on it as far as scumware authors are concerned.

      Windows is the low hanging fruit both because of default security and because of the monoculture install base size. Because of the increased risk on Windows and the education level of the users, its security needs to be technically superior to Linux to achieve the same risk and that is just not likely to happen anytime soon.

  10. It's true by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dual boot Ubuntu Edgy Eft with Gnome and Beryl. I can play WoW with it, listen to my mp3s with it, surf the web with it, watch YouTube with it, read/write email with it, do office stuff etc...the only two things I'm not doing with Linux yet are watching DVDs (I tried that earlier tonight and had some weird problems) and using my webcam...and the latter is only because I haven't bothered to install the drivers yet.

    I haven't completely weaned myself off XP yet, but I'm working on it. I advocate Ubuntu though to anyone who wants to find out for themselves that desktop Linux, even though it may not have been in the past, is now a genuinely viable reality.

    1. Re:It's true by LaughingCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can play WoW with it, listen to my mp3s with it, surf the web with it, watch YouTube with it...the only two things I'm not doing with Linux yet are watching DVDs
      Sounds like Ubuntu is all ready for use by state government employees then, except for that pesky DVD problem.
      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  11. Linux has found a home on my laptop by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've dual-booted for a long time, but it's only been recently that I started spending more time in Linux than in Windows. (And the shift was both dramatic and quick. In a single day, I went from less than 20% of my time spent in Linux to over 80%.) This is mostly due to the proliferation of Web 2.0. The latest version of Exchange's Webmail means that I no longer need to use Outlook, and Open Office is a more than adequate substitute for Office. There are a few internal web-apps that claim to require IE, but Greasemonkey has been letting me repair the worst of them. (BTW, I would love to have a way for User Agent Switcher to recognize certain URLs as needing a special string, instead of me getting an error page and having to change the string manually.)

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My story is sort of the opposite of yours. I'm a long time user of many OS's, but lately I find myself using Linux less and Windows more. The reasons for this are a bit complicated. The recent trend towards hardware assisted virtualization has finally allowed me to consolidate all my workstations into a single laptop. That is very cool and it means I can directly run Linux at the coffee shop, whereas it used to be available only at my desk at work (not counting server use). You'd think that would make me use it more, but in reality it means I use it less. You see, I basically run Linux on the desktop for a handful of applications that operate best there (GIMP, InkScape, OO, XPDF, etc.) The drawback to this system is I can only run 2 OS's at a time. The VMs are running on top of OS X, which is my workstation OS of choice and runs 90% of my apps. I find myself more and more running Windows in the VM for an irreplaceable application, which means I have to shut it down to run Linux. That's not a big deal, but for most of what I do, there are acceptable replacements for the Linux software (Photoshop, Illustrator, TextEdit, Preview, etc.) More and more often I find myself just editing that vector graphic element in Illustrator so I don't have to shut down Windows. Linux may be winning corporate desktops from Windows, but I fear they are also losing a lot of home and power user desktops to OS X. I'll be curious to see if corporate Linux adoption really does take off and if that has the expected impact on home use. If wider adoption means those irreplaceable Windows applications become replaceable, the story will change in a hurry.

    2. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2

      Textpad: $30

      I actually wrote "TextEdit" which is another one bundled with OS X (I use it to edit .doc files quickly with a small footprint).

      Sure, if you can spend $1000+ on software then there's no problem finding replacements, much better ones too.

      I'm a professional. My company buys my hardware and software, unless it is something I buy for one of my contract jobs. When I'm doing contract work I bill about $100/hour. The cost/benefit of software that lets me do half my tasks faster pays for this software really, really quickly. One of the things I'd like to stress, however, is that it is not always an either/or situation. GIMP is better for some tasks and I use it for them. GIMP can be installed under OS X too, it just isn't quite as nice. Because Linux does not offer me as much that is non-portable or that is not offered elsewhere, it end up being used less on the desktop. If Windows software was more portable or had more replacements, Linux would start to win that battle. Or, if Linux was more capable on the desktop compared to OS X, or OS X was more portable and ran well in a VM, Linux might win more. As it is, its strengths aren't as important as other platform's limitations.

  12. New distributions are helping a lot the process by gusmao · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was having a conversation with a friend exactly about that in this past weekend. New distributions are finally managing to be easy to install and use, offering to the user every software they may need to replace windows'. I installed Ubuntu for the first time about a week ago, it took about half an hour and the installation was flawless. No hard questions, every device properly recognized and configured, wireless network perfectly functioning, sweet. Of course there are lots of room for improvement, but it's never been so close

    I've never believed that linux would take over the desktop market, but now that exist distributions that may grandmother can install and mantain by herself and with corporations and governments pushing it more and more, every incentives for non-nerd people to adopt linux are in place.

  13. Linux is getting there, slowly by sco_robinso · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a windows System Admin (although I run Ubuntu personally), I can finally say that Linux is starting to get there, albeit slowly. I would definately say that linux is ready for a corporate IT envrionment.

    It's still going to take a bit of time before it's fully ready for the home desktop though. I use 802.11 wireless as a perfect example of that - amongst the 'warm and fuzzy' distro's (SuSe, Ubuntu, Mandrake, Lycoris), I have yet to be able to set up a system where there wasn't a fairly significant amount of rigmoral to get something as simple as wireless with basic encryption running. It wasn't really 'hard' for me to get the wireless running, but in each case, it required editing of text files, and typically no less that 7 or 8 CLI entries. Linux has come a long ways, even in the past 2 or 3 years. I think Ubuntu is a great example of a good, easy to use OS. However, there's still a few dark and nasty corners of Linux which need polishing before it's ready for the masses. And let's not mention games and brand name apps which only run under windows.

    Overall, it is exiting to see and watch. For the first time ever in the past few months, I've been able to recommend Ubuntu to begginner and novice users, as an easy-to-use alternative to Macs or Windows, with a straight face.

  14. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoted text from here:

    Paul Campbell began his career as an Investigator for the Internal Revenue Service focused on reducing financial fraud.

    Unnecessarily subsiding a monopoly using taxpayers money, could well be considered fraud.

    He later served as a Special Agent for the Office of the Inspector General, General Services Administration, investigating public corruption.

    Let's not ask why he never looked at alternative suppliers in his current role.

    As an attorney, Paul worked as an Assistant State's Attorney in Illinois and in private practice at Piper Rudnick concentrating on commercial and business litigation matters. In 2001, after earning his M.B.A. at Northwestern University, Paul also served as Piper Rudnick's Knowledge Partner. He joined CMS as Assistant Director in February 2003 and was named Director of the Department in June 2005. Under Paul's leadership, CMS continues to achieve savings and enhance services as it implements new technologies, reduces waste and rethinks many of the administrative operations of the state.

    Where's the scientific data to support that claim? Where are the case studies?

    In light of this guys comments and history, IL residents should complain to their governors office. I'm sure Campbell would happily consent to an audit to ensure everything is above board.

  15. Misquote by NotFamous · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was acutally "We don't have time for science in state government"

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  16. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still have a hard time as an administrator to get things like HP Printers to work with Linux. When I do get them working, I run into strange things like not being able to print out a landscape PDF in portrait. Either you're using very, very outdated printer software (*ahem*redhat*ahem), or you're using applications that aren't designed to work with modern Linux printing software like CUPS, hpijs, gnome-cups and KDE printing support. Whether inkjet or laser, I haven't had such problems with any HP printers in a very, very long time.

  17. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Taxpayers don't have a say in every purchasing decision the government makes.
    Why the hell shouldn't we? As far as I'm aware of, the govt is using our tax dollars to pay for it right?

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  18. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What interface are you referring to then?
    The biggest drawback to Linux is that it requires a modicum of intelligence to learn. God forbid anyone should have to expend effort in an attempt to learn something new these days.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  19. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also like how you install the Gimp but don't get any printing support by default so have to install Gimp-print later. (I think that may have even required unmerging and remerging the Gimp proper... it's been a while.)

    What sort of image program doesn't have printing support out of the box?

  20. The luxury of wealth by atomic777 · · Score: 2

    While perhaps not the richest or largest state in the union, Illinois still has an economy nearly the size of the Netherlands and can afford to throw money away on Windows. The rest of the world, meanwhile, will continue to innovate with OSS and leave the US with bloated, expensive systems to maintain

  21. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Locklin · · Score: 3, Funny

    1: buy MS software
    2: decide to do a "case study" on "total cost of ownership"
    3: recieve massive discounts from MS.
    4: publish the difference between 1 and 3

    everybody wins!

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  22. Re:Said it before... by Rycross · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Talking about freedom isn't going to fly when making a business case though. Freedom is a great reason to use FOSS, but if you want to get your boss adopted, you have to frame it the right way. Instead of talking about "freedom" as a concept, you ask him how he feels that Microsoft could change their software and make you lose your data, with no way of getting it back. Or, in my case, when evaluating a proprietary product, I could say "Well, this open source one does everything we need, its free, and the big bonus is that if we run into problems with it, we can take that source and work around it. If we use proprietary product X, we'd have to beg them for features." This is actually something I argued.

    To be quite frank, software freedom is kinda an out-there idea for a lot of people not closely associated with FOSS or computers in general. Dropping that on their lap is likely to put them off. If you can frame it in a way that illustrates exactly how it benefits them without bringing all the emotional baggage that typical FOSS screeds carry, then you will be a lot more successful.

    Thats why people talk about cost a lot. Its a very effective trojan to get FOSS into businesses.

  23. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a problem on Ubuntu Edgy with my Laserjet 2100. It does not align properly. I've been too lazy to look up the alignment info, because it's not really that important. But it is very stupid. The system claims to know the kind of printer I have. It recommended a driver for the device. Why is it not printing on the page?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. seems fair by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    seeing as how science projects rarely make time for state governments.

    perhaps the linux community needs to reach out. you know what might do the trick is yet another repackaged ubuntu distro that caters to some cultural minority. maybe you can call it illinibuntu or just dabuntu.

    --
    sarcasm:
    -noun
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  25. Case Study of Corruption. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this, the office was a scandal. If anything, it's an example of how not to do things.

    Central Management Services is the agency in charge of most state purchasing and hiring. Its influence over other agencies has expanded sharply under Blagojevich. State auditors repeatedly have found management problems there.

    One particularly scathing audit, released just as Campbell was taking over the agency, found CMS had paid improper expenses to contractors, failed to document the cost-cutting it claimed to have achieved and sometimes allowed contractors to start working before having a signed deal.

    Follow-up audits six months and one year later found continuing problems, as well as some improvement.

    Blagojevich's hiring practices have raised questions, particularly from federal prosecutors.

    Where there's corruption, expect M$ to be crammed down your throat.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  26. Then I have a suggestion for your boss by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either hire a better administrator OR just suck it up and be a windows shop.

    The simple fact is that lack of skills in your employees is a problem you have to deal with in many fields, either hire better ones, train the ones you got OR do without that skill.

    It is the reaon you see those semi-cars. They are small trucks drivable with a car license that have a setup similar to a semi (those big trucks with a tractor element and the eh cargo element (am I dazzling you with my tech speak yet?)) because transport companies find it impossible to hire enough people with truck licenses (and are unwilling to train new ones). They offer more cargo space then a van wich in some business is more important then their low weight limit.

    Linux will have to be a choice similar to that, you can forget getting your nephews 12 year old kid to configure it, you are going to have to move your business software of Excell and you are going to have to hire someone who in 2007 isn't still baffled by setting up a printer.

    Oh am I too harsh? Well, I am so sorry but for the last decade I seen nothing but people come up with one excuse after another why Linux is so hard, while at the same time I get those things working without a sweat. Am I that brilliant, are you that stupid OR are you just making up excuses.

    Use windows, but don't try to put the blame on linux.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Then I have a suggestion for your boss by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      (OT)
      "It is the reaon you see those semi-cars"
      Must be a European thing.
      The US equivalents are "hot shot" rigs where a large "dually" pickup pulls "gooseneck" or fifth-wheel trailers.
      Our Department of Transportation is getting wise to this and ticketing appropriately when the rigs aren't permitted for interstate commerce.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  27. Science Projects by chromatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.

    What if Chicago donated the time of all the workers painting "Richard M. Daley, Mayor" on every garbage can in the city? That could free a lot of time.

  28. Default and easily are relevant by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I said I was capable of customizing a Hyundai so that it outran a Maserati Bora, would you say "Hyundais can be just as fast as Maseratis". Yes? Would you be right? Sorta. But not where it counts

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  29. Re:not microsoft's fault by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm hoping that more projects like Ndiswrapper will come out,Which,IMO would fix the biggest problem I've found in converting folks-Drivers for all the little add-ons they have. Ndiswrapper has done wonders for WIFI (which is how I'm running Xandros 3.0 instead of the WinXP this laptop came with).I'm hoping that similar tools will come out for printers,which always seem to be the trouble I have getting someone to convert.

    Of course the ultimate would be a kind of universal Ndiswrapper where you could use any windows printer/webcam/pci card,etc without having to worry about whether there is a Linux driver written for it.Probably WAY to much to ask for,but it is nice to dream.I'd be happy to settle for a printer Niswrapper so I wouldn't have to run Windows to deal with all these damn buggy Lexmark cheapy printers that seem to be so popular around here.I spent 4 hours trying to get this Lexmark X1270 that was given to me to work in Linux before giving up and just slapping a Win2K partition on my desktop just to deal with the thing.

    I think the Linux desktop is more than ready for the average user.It's the little add-ons that seem to keep a lot of folks on Windows (at least in my exp).

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  30. Re:not microsoft's fault by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find your argument interesting. However, one thing I like the most about Linux is the fact I actually have the ability to fix any problems I may encounter. Unfortunately, I am not able to say the same thing for Windows.

    In all honesty, were Windows open source - my perspective might well change. I couldn't honestly say, since that option obviously not available. But I would certainly give it a chance.

    An example would be an issue one of my desktops has with msvcirt.dll that causes issues with (some) C/C++ compiled programs. It's a known issue, and there is even a hotfix that was developed in October of 2004. Amazing how it's still a hotfix, in 2007. I can even get the hotfix - all I have to do is pay $59. I might even be able to get it free by calling MS and sitting through a half hour of interrogation about my Windows license (And yes, it's legit - OEM from Dell, it's the principle of the matter that bothers me most. If I wanted to be treated like a criminal just to be a customer, I'd buy music CDs, too.)

    It sounds to me the process of denail, blame, and self righteousness might be at work here -- but I don't believe it's in support for Linux adoption. Linux is free. It is also an extremely reliable platform. Most importantly, it is an open system. Should something go wrong, you are able to fix it yourself -- should you be capable.

    The only thing I see giving MS an advantage is the fact they already have the majority of the market-share. As MS' market-share lowers and Linux adoption grows, we will see a greater level of commercial software development on Linux -- and the game will certainly change then. Personally, though, unless you use MS Office or play games only available to Windows -- there's really no benefit to having Windows over Linux aside from preferences. And I imagine a great many people will always prefer Windows because it is familiar, if nothing else. Honestly, for the work I do on the PC -- were it not for the completely crap inability I have to fix problems within Windows due to it's closed nature -- I would probably prefer Windows for the GUI environment. I guess I just like the GUI better, to be frank. But when it comes to the dirty 'real' work - I will always have a preference for the unix-like command line of Linux.

    Then again, if UltraEdit-32 was available on Linux, haha - that might change too. Ohh my, what a mind twister!

    In the end, both OS' have room for improvement. I like them both, but to say anyone promoting either OS is in denial, blame, or self-righteous is just arrogant at best.

  31. Re:donations by rujholla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Results:

    52 records found in 0.0469 seconds.

    Total for this search: $1,892,584

    Search Criteria:
    Donor name: Microsoft
    Donor State: WA
    Cycle(s) selected: 2006, 2004, 2002

    Then it goes on to list all the seperate donations -- majority of which appear to go to RNC but there are substantial amounts to DNC also.

    http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?key=9 8JHH&txtName=Microsoft&txtState=WA&txt2006=Y&txt20 04=Y&txt2002=Y&Order=N