Slashdot Mirror


New US Computer Forensic Institute

Quincy writes "The DHS and Secret Service are setting up a new computer forensic institute in Alabama. Set to open in mid-2008, the new National Computer Forensic Institute will be able to train over 900 law enforcement officers per year. 'It will initially be staffed by 18 Secret Service agents and will feature classrooms, a forensic laboratory, an evidence vault, and server rooms. Courses will be offered in the investigation of electronic crimes, network intrusion investigation, and computer forensics... [T]he Secret Service says that it will help to bring judges and prosecutors up to speed as well.'" Maybe over time we'll see fewer botches of justice like those in the news recently.

131 comments

  1. I wonder. by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do you HAVE to be a law officer, or can anyone sign up?

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:I wonder. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      A friend of mine got a job with the FBI as a network technician. He carries a badge and gun with his networking gear. I guess the gun is needed for those rare occasions when troubleshooting gets out of hand.

    2. Re:I wonder. by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My hope is that more computer science majors go into law enforcement.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:I wonder. by Instine · · Score: 1

      Keep hoping. The fact is, most people who sign up to be cops, don't want to do the kind of learning that is require (not disparageing and this comes with all the caveats of any generalization). Its just not their bag...

      --
      Because you can - or because you should?
    4. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He carries a badge and gun with his networking gear.

      Well, that Marge from Accounting keeps on downloading that Bonzai Buddy. Something's gotta be done about it.

    5. Re:I wonder. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Instead of the trend recently of more law enforcement happening in our computers?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:I wonder. by Stephen+Tennant · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Oh officer, you're going to arrest me? Please, just take a look in this box first..."

      Officer, sweating, gulping, "Is that what I think it is?"

      "That's right, and if this crate of mint condition, first edition gold-embossed Call of Cthulu sets were to disappear, I'm sure no one would mind too much, as these things tend to happen..."

      --
      I spend most of my time in bed, darling.
    7. Re:I wonder. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather fight to protect people FROM law enforcement, considering their track record of late.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:I wonder. by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A bachelor's degree is a requirement to join the force in many major cities.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    9. Re:I wonder. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      And that degree usually comes in the form of criminal justice or political science, which don't even involve any sort of advanced math, just statistics, if that. Not exactly on the same level of learning or effort as computer science.

    10. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep telling yourself that.

    11. Re:I wonder. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      His employer supplies him with a LART? nice... =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    12. Re:I wonder. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I've known kids who majored in political science and criminal justice. Their programs simply aren't as rigorous as a computer science or physics program. Being time-consuming by forcing students to write papers (which is what political science and criminal justice students spend their time doing) isn't the same thing as being rigorous.

    13. Re:I wonder. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1
      You mean this definition?

      strictly applied or adhered to
      Nothing is more strict than numbers. It's just pure objectivity. Sounds to me like you went to some liberal arts "Those mean hard science majors don't think my political science curriculum is as hard as those, but that's not fair!" school.
    14. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly on the same level of learning or effort as computer science.

      Computer "science" is for dumb kids. Anyone can learn it with minimal effort. It's not medicine, physics or anything serious.

      It's just the nerds who keep thinking of CS as something incredibly difficult, so that they can fool themselves into believing they are special.

    15. Re:I wonder. by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was a mathematics major and now work as a professional mathematician. Thanks for playing!

      I meant any of:
      1. Characterized by or acting with rigor: a rigorous program to restore physical fitness.
      2. Full of rigors; harsh: a rigorous climate.
      3. Rigidly accurate; precise.

      The first two would be satisfied by a good political science program. Since you mentioned 'numbers' and objectivity, I'll say that you're making yourself sound like a huge idiot to the several thousand of us who know anything about mathematical logic and how it relates to philosophy. That debate has been going on for centuries and has not been settled, even though the anti-Realist claims are true.

      Hint: Is the Continuum Hypothesis true? Is it false? Or does it depend on who's asking?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  2. So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny

    Queue the banjo music.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by genrader · · Score: 1

      We also have Huntsville, where all of our nice NASA research goes on.

    2. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Probably the last place on Earth where slide rulers still rule. :)

    3. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by LAN+Lubber · · Score: 1

      Whomever modded parent "Insightful" apparently has never heard of Huntsville.

    4. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "cue"

      I can't believe anyone would label the parent post "insightful". I'm thinking more along the lines of "troll" or "offtopic".

      As others have mentioned, NASA is in the state... not to mention Honda and soon to be Hyndai.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Mizled · · Score: 1

      Queue the banjo music.

      As someone who lives in Alabama...I resent that statement.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass.
    6. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      We also have Huntsville, where all of our nice NASA research goes on.

      On advanced technologies for converting between feet and meters, no doubt.
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at # 28, and notice which big company built the unit. That's right jacka**, it was built by a team of homegrown professionals from Huntsville, not IBM, HP, or Cray. The System Engineers built it, and it's beautiful.

    8. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh! Fogot the the link :) http://www.top500.org/list/2006/11/100

      Look at # 28, and notice which big company built the unit. That's right jacka**, it was built by a team of homegrown professionals from Huntsville, not IBM, HP, or Cray. The System Engineers built it, and it's beautiful.

    9. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queue the banjo music.

      I do not think that word means what you think it means...

    10. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      No, that was JPL... california.

    11. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Alabammy," you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Most of the top forensic training sites are in the boondocks. FLETC (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center) is in southern Georgia, NW3C (National White Collar Crime Center) is in West Virginia, and now USSS in Alabama. The only one in a habitable location is DCITA (DoD Cyber Investigations Training Academy) in the Baltimore-DC Belt.

    13. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      Good points all, but you can take off the "soon to be". The Hyundai plant in Montgomery has been operating for almost two years now, and has received the highest QA ratings possible.

    14. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by OTDR · · Score: 1

      Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, AL, designed and guided the construction of the Saturn family of launch vehicles, America's first dedicated launch platform that ultimately landed us first on the Moon. Thirty-One (31) vehicles built, ZERO failures. Kiss my Alabama ass (paraphrased from Polly Holiday).

    15. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

      Alabama is also home to the Missile and Space Intelligence Center (MSIC).

    16. Re:So, they have computers in Alabama now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the aforementioned organizations, Huntsville's Redstone Arsenal will soon be home to the Army Materiel Command and the Missile Defense Agency. The new Bridge Street complex in Research Park is going to be amazing. Huntsville is a great place to be right now.

      People love to make disparaging remarks about Alabama, but the truth is that we have a low cost of living and high wages. Mobile/Gulf Shores is a 4-5 hour drive away, Atlanta in 4 hours, the Smoky Mountains are about the same. Nashville is 2 hours, Chattanooga 1 hour. No city is "perfect", but if you are involved in any computer-related industry, or are an engineer, you won't do better than this.

      My family is building a home less than 5 miles out of the Huntsville city limits. I will have virtually no commute, a gorgeous home, good schools, and money left over to not be house poor.

  3. In honor of... by fitten · · Score: 1

    J. Edgar no doubt ;)

  4. Sounds like a near-impossible task by 26199 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Figuring out what happened in a computer system months after the fact is not easy. Most programmers have more than enough trouble figuring out what exactly happened in their own programs thirty seconds ago.

    Still -- not to say it's a bad idea. You have to start somewhere...

    1. Re:Sounds like a near-impossible task by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Figuring out what happened in a computer system months after the fact is not easy.

      Particularly when the adversary is purposefully taking steps to obfuscate, overwrite, and otherwise render the previous system state unrecoverable.

    2. Re:Sounds like a near-impossible task by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Figuring out what happened in a computer system months after the fact is not easy.

      If only there were some sort of training program to teach people what to look for...

    3. Re:Sounds like a near-impossible task by 26199 · · Score: 1

      The problem being, there's too much detail needed to be 100% (or even 98%) accurate. They can only teach "If X then Y" when the reality is "If X and A then B, C then Y".

      I would hate for someone to get convicted for X when A, B, and C are missing.

  5. PUMP AND DUMP by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    I hope they go after spam, those stock spams are the worst.

  6. More of the same by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Secret Service has tried to produce aids like their "Best practices for seizing electronic evidence", and the National Institute of Justice has published its guide to "Digital Evidence in the Courtroom", but the need for more advanced training has been obvious in numerous recent cases This will consist mostly of practicing the correct SOP for the using the forklift to cart out every single piece of computer equipment on the site. I sincerely doubt that they'll be teaching any discretionary tactics or give up their current practice of confiscating everything in sight.
    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    1. Re:More of the same by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Here's a question I've been wondering: What happens to your computer in each of the following cases?

      1) Siezed as evidence, found innocent of charges
      2) Siezed as evidence, found guilty of charges
      3) Siezed as evidence, found innocent of sex-related charges
      4) Siezed as evidence, found guilty of sex-related charges

      I mean, it's not a box of pot. They can't easily take the pot out and return the box to you. Are they mandated to format the hard drive first? What about my diablo 2 single-player char!?!?

    2. Re:More of the same by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      It sounds like they'll be teaching what to do with a hard disk image, which goes beyond just "use EnCase".

      Besides, you have to seize everything unless you've got some guarantee that there's no evidence concealed on a nerdstick, an iPod, or any of a kajillion things that store more data than a high end hard disk did fifteen years ago.

    3. Re:More of the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In cases (1) and (3), I believe the answer is you might eventually get most of your stuff back, but probably not as soon as you'd like. For example, SJ Games vs. the Secret Service. I don't know the government's side of that action, but as far as I know, Steve Jackson Games is a perfectly harmless games company, and Cyberpunk is just a role-playing game. It makes as much sense as raiding Hasbro because they sell a game involving bombs and military action.

      Hopefully having a Computer Forensic Institute will help minimize the harm to innocent people while making it harder for the guilty to escape.

    4. Re:More of the same by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "nerdstick"

      Heh. That's a keeper. I've got three on my person at the moment. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:More of the same by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean, it's not a box of pot. They can't easily take the pot out and return the box to you.

      You wouldn't get the box back anyway if they found illegal marijuana in it. The box would be evidence. You'd be unable to claim it after conviction because you'd be sitting in prison, and it would become unclaimed property and if it was nice it would go home with some cop.

      Your computer, you will probably get back, because they've been getting more and more heat if they do something bad to your PC... as long as you weren't convicted anyway.

      Incidentally, if you live in California, and you have a prescription, and the cops seize a legal amount of marijuana from you, you will likely get it back. People have also gotten seized plants returned.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:More of the same by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't get the box back anyway if they found illegal marijuana in it. The box would be evidence.

      That seems egregiously attractive for abuse, cop theft notwithstanding.

      Step 1) Find crime (any will do)
      Step 2) Involve object
      Step 3) Profit? (or at least deny person of object)

    7. Re:More of the same by Roane · · Score: 1

      Confiscating everything that can store anything is a good start. It's also important to train forensics examiners on how to effectively testify on their findings. Striking a balance between language plain enough for a jury and precise enough to CYA from the defense is not an easy task.

    8. Re:More of the same by c0lsndrs · · Score: 1

      All seized evidence must be properly disposed of. If it's been used in criminal proceedings, usually the prosecutor dictates what happens to the evidence. Cops don't always take computers. Often just the hard drive will do. Of course, it requires a competent law enforcement officer to make that determination at the scene, and it obviously depends upon the case. Fraud case, might not take the machine. Hacker case, might take the machine. Child porn case, might take the machine. If seized as evidence and found not guilty (found innocent is not a determination that can be made by our court system), the computer/hdd is returned to the owner. If it contained contraband, as of in the case of sex crimes, it might be wiped (formatting is not a secure way of deleting data). If seized as evidence and found to be guilty, it depends. If the computer/hdd is a fruit or instrumentality of the crime, it will be disposed of. Often "disposal" involves wiping the drive and using it (and possibly the computer) in the police department. If it only held evidence but wasn't really used to commit the crime, or wasn't purchased with fraudulent money, it can be returned to the suspect or the suspect's family. This disposal occurs only after all appeals have been exhausted.

    9. Re:More of the same by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That seems egregiously attractive for abuse, cop theft notwithstanding.

      Dude, they've been seizing houses for years. Even rentals! Now that is seriously fucked up. Rent your house to a grower, whether you know it or not, and you can lose it. There's no collusion there. At least, not necessarily. So why should that even be possible?

      The whole system is a fraud. The entire system is about abuse: abuse of the American people in order to make money for a select few corporations.

      During the war it was HEMP FOR VICTORY... How did we end up here? (Rhetorical question, since I already know.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:More of the same by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Err. If I find evidence of a crime I am investigating on your hard drive it can NEVER be destroyed and must be locked in the case file in case of future appeals.

    11. Re:More of the same by c0lsndrs · · Score: 1

      This disposal occurs only after all appeals have been exhausted. See the last line of my post.
  7. Gotta wonder... by terrahertz · · Score: 1

    ...if they will be training the staff on Helix. I'm not in the security industry myself, but that is one helluva handy LiveCD to keep around.

    Despite the backing of the DHS budget, they're gonna need every free piece of help they can get.

    --
    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:Gotta wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that the main forensics tool (but not the only one) being taught is EnCase, especially since it has a track record of being successfully defended in court, in terms of the reliability from an evidentiary standpoint. It's widely considered to be the "gold standard" for that reason.

      I didn't see anything on Helix site about its track record of defensibility in actual criminal matters. That's kind of important if you are investigating or prosecuting a case which depends on computer forensic evidence.

    2. Re:Gotta wonder... by terrahertz · · Score: 1

      That's the great part about Free Software -- no advertisement or marketing is necessary! You either use it and get something out of it...or use it, don't get anything out of it, and move on to the next candidate.

      I love it when ACs make suspiciously laudatory comments about a particular piece of commercial software. Makes the developer look bad, even if they aren't the ones posting.

      PS, Helix is good enough for...

      NW3C: Linux Forensics
      SANS Track 508: System Forensics, Investigation and Response
      InfoSec Institute: Computer Forensics Training
      SEARCH: Basic Investigators Training

      --
      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    3. Re:Gotta wonder... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      i would say that since the tools needed for aquiring the evidence are on the disc (includes an encase image tool) you could use these to get your evidence and then move the data to a computer with Encase installed to do the reports and case work.
      Chain of evidence goes Disc Monkeys > Tech > Senior Tech

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    4. Re:Gotta wonder... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      umm btw i did some checking and Linen is in fact the LINUX VERSION OF ENCASE written by the EnCase folks (and i think you get a copy of linen on the disc with the Windows version of Encase)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:Gotta wonder... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Luckily, if a product isn't good enough for the courts, it's not good enough for the police. Even if the open source product is actually better. Yes, this is a good thing.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  8. Huh? by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTFS: " Set to open in mid-2008, the new National Computer Forensic Institute will be able to train over 900 law enforcement officers per year. 'It will initially be staffed by 18 Secret Service agents and will feature classrooms, a forensic laboratory, an evidence vault, and server rooms. "

    Holy fsck! A full year from now? In a year computers will have changed enough to cause this to falter badly from the start! It will take only one worm of the right design, one change to hard drive technology, one of any number of things to change the virtual face of computer forensics. That change could happen next week. This taking over a year to put in production doesn't sound even close to flexible enough to accomplish the stated goals!

    1. Re:Huh? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to worry - this is brought to you by the Department of Homeland Security, whose charter is "spend all our budget on grants, ask for more next year", and whose primary product is press releases. Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Huh? by Lightwarrior · · Score: 1

      Theoretically the intervening time between then and now will be taken up designing a robust, in-depth curriculum and accompanying infrastructure that allows for the sort of flexibility needed to fight a "war" on the IT front. ...but why the Secret Service? This may just show my woefully inadequate knowledge of the US Government, but don't we have already have several Judicial branches designated to fight local, intra-state, and extra-country crime? I was under the impression that the primary duties of the Secret Service was the protection of high-ranking US officials and the prevention of counterfeiting US currency.

      -lw

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    3. Re:Huh? by westlake · · Score: 1
      but why the Secret Service? This may just show my woefully inadequate knowledge of the US Government... I was under the impression that the primary duties of the Secret Service was the protection of high-ranking US officials and the prevention of counterfeiting US currency.

      I think you answered your own question.

      The Secret Service is one of the oldest (1865) and (by no coincidence) most technically sophisticated of federal law enforcement agencies.

    4. Re:Huh? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      okay so what you do is build the walls (you know those CEMENT AND STEEL things) and the wiring the (10awg ,cat6, and fiberoptic stuff) and as you get closer to opening day you make sure that your actual face can handle the virtual face properly (worst case you have a BLACKBOX on call).

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:Huh? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      its kind-of complicated but the basic flow is (for details see "the hacker crackdown" by bruce sterling) Secret Service is part of the treasury dept > Money > InterState Trade>
      Communications > computers involved in communications > profit !! (unless the FBI steals the show)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    6. Re:Huh? by mtgarden · · Score: 1

      That would be nice, but unfortunately, they seem to be finding ways to invade our privacy more. If I could shut down one dept of the Government, I would start with HS.

    7. Re:Huh? by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Holy fsck! A full year from now? In a year computers will have changed enough to cause this to falter badly from the start! It will take only one worm of the right design, one change to hard drive technology, one of any number of things to change the virtual face of computer forensics. That change could happen next week. This taking over a year to put in production doesn't sound even close to flexible enough to accomplish the stated goals!

      Yeah, having to actually construct a building which provides the infrastructure is so annoying. Why don't they just skip all that so they can get to the actual teaching? Idiot. You do realize that it doesn't matter when they open because there will always be the possibility of a revolution in computer attacks? Considering what is out there now, an additional year won't matter too much to those who will be the first trainees. Yeah they should have had this 20 years ago but they didn't so what more do you want? They have to have a construction phase just like anything else. We aren't yet to the year 3000 where a building full of infrastructure comes in a 3x3 box with a button that when pressed makes the box explode into a building ready for use.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  9. Re:Alabama, where all the IT people go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    WTF? This is -1 off topic but this other post HERE is funny?

    To whom ever modded this down: BLOW ME

    Fucking SlashDot community keeps getting lamer and lamer each year...

  10. They need two separate education tracks by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Police investigators need much more than the theory, they need indepth coverage of the practices. Prosecutors and judges need more of the theory, the pros and cons, etc. A prosecutor doesn't need to know how to hunt down a trojan horse, but should be able to look at a police report and for the most part completely grok the methods the police used as a knowledgeable reader. Same with the judge.

  11. The other side by Target+Drone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Secret Service says that it will help to bring judges and prosecutors up to speed as well.'"

    What about defense attorneys?

    1. Re:The other side by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Damn good point.

      But since the prosecutorial state is interested in prosecuting and sentencing as many people as possible for as long as possible, they have no incentive to actually DEFEND people... I guarantee the tone of these classes is "how to get more convictions".... where it should be "how to better determine the truth".

      "How can we make an airtight case against the 15 year old who made a porno of his girlfriend?"

      mmmmhmmm

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:The other side by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      Good point. As a practical matter, this training will probably (hopefully) be available to anyone interested, particularly lawyers on both sides. Maybe the statement about prosecuting attorneys and judges was made just to show the public that the program will have value to them.

      (People being people, it is probably harder to stir up public support for programs designed to produce better criminal defense lawyers.)

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    3. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that, brother.

      Now they'll have more ammo to bring ridiculous prosecutions like the "Webe Web" case. They aren't naked? Who cares! We don't like it, and we sure as hell don't like anyone that DOES like it.

    4. Re:The other side by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      I just googled this "webe web" case. I find it hilarious that the whole controversy is framed by a bill introduced by Mark Foley.

      He's somehow special because he *chats* with the boys instead of looking at pictures of them. heh

      In all seriousness, he was a creepy old man, but nothing i saw in his chats were anything even close to exploitative, or dangerous, except the fact that he was abusing his position as an elected official for personal gain (woooo big surprise).

      Stew

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    5. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly frightening thing is that as computer forensic teams become more skilled, and as the definition of kiddy pr0n becomes more blurred, they may be able to prosecute basically anyone based on the contents of their computer. Given the current state of hysteria in American society, a jury would convict a grapefruit if they were told it was a pedophile.

      Piss off the wrong people and they could find a cached image on your computer of an underage girl in a swimsuit. Five years in prison and the sex offender registry for life.

    6. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      IAACFI (I am a computer forensic investigator).

      I was told that if I ever work for the defense in a criminal trial I will be banned from the main professional organization the HTCIA (High Tech Crime Investigation Association).

      I replied that doesn't make sense... in this country the accused are innocent until proven guilty, thus working for the defense is working for the innocent until proven otherwise. I said this rule and the attitude behind it assumes that everyone who has been accused is guilty. Doesn't it serve everyone to have a forensic investigator examine the data and reveal the facts?

      I was told to drop the subject.

      I usually don't post anonymously but in this case it might be prudent.

    7. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what do you plan to do? Just go along with this stance, buck the system and make your services available to defense attorneys, or find a different career?

    8. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crikey! If you get in trouble, and the cops used "dd" to examine your case on anything othe rthan a BSD machine, then your defense attorney should argue they botched the work. Cops are taught to copy your hard disk using "dd if=/dev/hda1 bs=512 conv=noerror,sync" but every OS except BSD can screw up the copying. Until someone patches the kernel.

  12. You do not have to be a cop. Any employee of the Ministry of Truth will be allowed.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  13. You don't need one. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    If you are innocent, you will not be convicted. Asking for a defense lawyer is an indication of guilt.

    --
    Blar.
  14. People have no idea how to *really* erase a file by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Microsoft must be the biggest supporter of computer forensic investigators.

    Even since DOS 1.0, Microsoft operating systems never really erase a file. Now, they use cache, temp files, and the recycling bin to make lots of copies too. And that's only on the unerased portion of the hard drive. Chances are there are more copies on the erased data sectors.

    Most users who really want to erase a file from the file system have to erase about two or three copies (if they know where the copies are). Wiping a file only zaps the original, not the copies.

    Those investigators have it too easy.

    My wiping program is made by Craftsman Tools (claw or ball-peen configuration)

  15. Re:Alabama, where all the IT people go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? This is -1 off topic but this post is insightful?

    To whom ever modded this up: BLOW ME

    Fucking SlashDot community keeps getting lamer and lamer each year...

  16. Probably Feds Only by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    Do you HAVE to be a law officer, or can anyone sign up? I strongly suspect that you'll have to be a civil servant to go and train, but probably not an official law enforcement officer (LEO).

    The federal government currently does this kind of training at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Glynco, Georgia. I was a federal employee working for an Office of Inspector General, and I went to FLETC for 2 weeks of digital forensics training in a classroom. I was NOT a sworn LEO (i.e. couldn't take oaths, arrest people, or serve subpoenas), just an "IT Specialist", but a federal employee nonetheless.

    Most of the other people in my particular class were State Department, assorted Interior (USFWS, BLM), or state/county/local cops (FLETC trains them if their org pays for it).
    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:Probably Feds Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So - how do I get a job protecting the governments networks instead of the corporations network, and how much of a pay cut do I have to take to serve my country?

    2. Re:Probably Feds Only by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I was NOT a sworn LEO (i.e. couldn't take oaths, arrest people, or serve subpoenas)

      You can make a citizen's arrest if you witness a misdemeanor or have reason to believe that someone has committed a felony.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Probably Feds Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if by "arrest" you mean "ask them nicely to wait for the police". You can't do much more without opening yourself up to severe criminal and civil liability. Taking someone to a police station? That's kidnapping. Holding them by threat of force or force? That's false imprisonment in most cases.

      In many jurisdictions, the police can't arrest someone for a misdemeanor unless they witnessed it.

    4. Re:Probably Feds Only by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Only if by "arrest" you mean "ask them nicely to wait for the police". You can't do much more without opening yourself up to severe criminal and civil liability.

      Yes, you open yourself up to liability. You still have the legal right to do it.

      Taking someone to a police station? That's kidnapping. Holding them by threat of force or force? That's false imprisonment in most cases.

      The former is true. You can't take them anywhere without their will. The latter, however, is not true, although it does come down to your word against theirs. If they have substantial priors and you don't, though, you're virtually guaranteed vindication. In most cases you won't feel a need to arrest anyone who isn't like that :)

      You have the legal right to use necessary force to prevent someone you are placing under citizen's arrest from fleeing the scene. But what would be much smarter is to place them under citizen's arrest, and watch them leave. This is legally considered evading arrest, and is just one more thing for them to get busted on.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. meager offerings by malevolentjelly · · Score: 2, Funny

    'It will initially be staffed by 18 Secret Service agents and will feature classrooms, a forensic laboratory, an evidence vault, and server rooms. No water slide? Those republicans sure know how to "starve the beast"...
  18. Alabama? by purpleraison · · Score: 2, Funny
    Computer forensics, and Alabama??

    Am I the only one here who got a laugh out of this?

    Redneck #1: (pokes computer with a stick) "dang, can't say ah evah seen one of dem der thangs b'for"

    Reneck #2: (spits out chewing tobacco) "Well, ah dunno wut dat der thang is, but I rekon we oughta be shootin' it bout now"

    Redneck #1: (opens beer from 6-pack holster on belt) "hmm, watchu say we take dis inta town here, and seeif summun'll know what it is?"

    Reneck #2: "boy.. are you kiddin? We's the smart ones in dis heah town! I'm tellin ya'll that dis is from space. Dat's waht dis is! A space ve-hic-al"

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
    1. Re:Alabama? by jaysones · · Score: 1

      No, based on the other comments, you are not the only prejudiced person here.

    2. Re:Alabama? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer forensics, and Alabama??
      Am I the only one here who got a laugh out of this?
      Redneck #1: (pokes computer with a stick) "dang, can't say ah evah seen one of dem der thangs b'for"
      Reneck #2: (spits out chewing tobacco) "Well, ah dunno wut dat der thang is, but I rekon we oughta be shootin' it bout now"
      Redneck #1: (opens beer from 6-pack holster on belt) "hmm, watchu say we take dis inta town here, and seeif summun'll know what it is?"
      Reneck #2: "boy.. are you kiddin? We's the smart ones in dis heah town! I'm tellin ya'll that dis is from space. Dat's waht dis is! A space ve-hic-al"

      It's a good thing the US space program didn't operate there. Can you imagine what would have happened if NASA had started in Alabama?

    3. Re:Alabama? by purpleraison · · Score: 0

      It's called a JOKE, and it's not prejudice when you joke about yourself. However, ignorance is assuming you a person is prejudiced, and idiocy is not being able to interpret a joke...

      Three terms for you to go back and hit the books on:
      1. prejudice
      2. ignorance
      3. idiocy

      Moderator -- this HAS to be worth one point for me simply explaining it was a joke... pleeaasse??

      --
      I am open source, and Linux baby!
    4. Re:Alabama? by jaysones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thanks, man. I understand that you were trying to be funny but let's "hit the books" anyway, shall we?

      1. Prejudice: "an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics." As demonstrated by your hilarious joke which directs hostility against Alabamians as beer-drunk redneck technophobes.
      2. Ignorance: "lack of knowledge, education, or awareness." If I can't use the "joke" as an example twice, what about the lack of education evident in your grammar choices? "Ignorance is assuming you a person is..."
      3. Idiocy: "something notably stupid or foolish." Sucking up to slashdot mods, for instance.

      Your grammar and spelling in the previous post indicate that, if you are from south (as I am), then you're doing more on your own to perpetuate the ignorant stereotypes than your totally lame joke.
      I can't believe I spent this much time on you.

    5. Re:Alabama? by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      you are not the only prejudiced person here.

      1) Well, you're definitely new in town, aren't you. Classical "you must be new here" bait.

      2) You need to ease up a little. Everybody knows they have six-pack holsters as standard accessories in Alabama, your trying to deny it is no good. Next thing you'll be saying they have a computer forsenics lab over there, or something.

    6. Re:Alabama? by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Right, because when I think of cutting edge technology I think of Alabama!

      That is exactly the point. The gov't doesn't want to advertise sites like these. Sure, the more famous ones everyone will know about (Fort Knox), the locals will know about the facility, and there may even be a website (now or in the future) that tells you where the facility is located but I'm sure they chose Alabama for multiple reasons (Huntsville is booming) and one of those was probably because it isn't a location where you would normally look for a facility like that. They will also probably build it so that it doesn't look like anything special with no huge signs advertising its existence. It's for security. Other locations around the U.S. are treated the same way for the same reason.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  19. law enforcement "bringing judges up to speed".... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    quoth the grunt "me have baaad feeling about this".

    isnt it always these people who are supporting the RIAA/MPAA/BSA/etc in open memos to congress and various other bodies.

    I'd rather we "bring judges up to speed" by sending them to their local state u for a crash BA in computer science, where they will get "enough" of the theory they need to make judgments that are not incompetent, but without the bias from an organization which by its nature attracts inflexible authoritarians.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  20. Re:People have no idea how to *really* erase a fil by mandelbr0t · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wiping program is made by Craftsman Tools (claw or ball-peen configuration) So violent! A powerful electromagnet should make any data recovered from the HDD suspect at best, and most likely non-existant. The electomagnet has the advantage of requiring only a single switch, and it can be flicked remotely.
    --
    "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
  21. "A Visit From The F.B.I." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  22. I want my Oreo cookie tin back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't easily take the pot out and return the box to you They don't return the box either.
  23. Typical law enforcement mentality by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    if (this_player()->query("made a mistake"))
    {
        if (criminal(this_player()))
            this_player()->retribution();
        if (oneofus(this_player()))
            this_player()->rehabilitation();
    }

    1. Re:Typical law enforcement mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, you put in two ifs there, and got the order wrong. Here, let me fix that.

      if (this_player()->query("made a mistake"))
      {
              if (oneofus(this_player()))
                      this_player()->rehabilitation();
              else
                      this_player()->retribution();
      }

  24. We're all fucked. by Seumas · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is commonly known that the majority of police officers know absolutely nothing about civil liberties, right to privacy or any other constitutional or legal rights. This is why you are never supposed to argue with an officer. Their job is to arrest you when they think you're doing something wrong and let the law sort you out. This is also why they frequently infringe on a number of your rights. Either out of lack of concern or simple ignorance.

    Likewise, one should be incredibly frightened at the concept of an officer who is equally ignorant or unconcerned about your rights being capable of investigating your most vital and private of information and communication.

    Not to mention, you know, the whole history of commonly fabricating evidence.

    1. Re:We're all fucked. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      This really annoys me. You hear about a few bad cops in the news and suddenly the majority of police officers know absolutely nothing about civil liberties, right to privacy or any other constitutional or legal rights.

      My dad is a retired cop who now teaches academy classes on top of his new job. Granted we live in a somewhat rural county (2 cities of 25k, a few other smaller ones around), but he would actually get letters written to him praising his work and professionalism from people he gave a ticket to or arrested!

      Your generalizations are like me saying no-one who reads slashdot has ever left their parents' basement and definately never spoken with a real girl before.

      And what worries me is you get modded insightful for contributing nothing useful. Best way to karma whore is blame the man! (or microsoft)

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:We're all fucked. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      This isn't about your dad or television news. A cop's job is to arrest people. Their job isn't to be concerned with their civil liberties and they are not typically educated (as part of the job, at least) in civil liberties and privacy rights. This is why when your rights are violated, you just eat it and deal with it later via a lawyer.

      Your response is like saying that because one person is good at their job that everyone is. Further, whether people write your father letters about what a great job he does has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not he has ever violated someone's civil liberties. A lot of people don't even know when their own rights are being violated and when they do, there's often not a lot they can do about it.

      For what anecdotal evidence is or isn't worth, I have had the experience as fifteen many years ago of being wrongly arrested because I matched the "white male with dark hair" description they had of some little bastard in the area. After they arrested me, and on the drive to the jail, they kept asking me a bunch of questions and they had a very snarky attitude. I very politely said "I don't mean any offense, but I don't wish to speak with anyone unless I have a lawyer or my parents with me". Those were the extent of all words I spoke with them after the arrest.

      However, what they put on the police report was complete garbage. They wrote that I confessed to breaking into a house and damaging two car tires. That I bragged about it to them on the drive to the jail. And then that I threatened I would "do it all over again" and called them a bunch of names.

      Sorry, but as nice as you feel your dad is, I have had personal experiences with cops and how they lie about the simplest of things for absolutely no reason. I mean, honestly, if they're willing to do that over some goofy teenage kid then what do you think they do when they believe they have the right person regarding a serious offense?!

      And guess what happened to the cops, even after the very next morning when I was released and the charges were dropped and it was noted on the record that it was a case of mistaken identification? Nothing.

    3. Re:We're all fucked. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      And what worries me is you get modded insightful for contributing nothing useful. Best way to karma whore is blame the man! (or microsoft) Oh, and what worries me is that you might get modded insightful for contributing nothing useful. Best way to get people to coddle you or share your viewpoint is to say "my daddy is a cop" or "my mommy is a teacher" or "my brother is in the military". As if having a family member in any of those fields of employment somehow validates every statement you make regarding them and nullifies those of everyone else contradicting you.
    4. Re:We're all fucked. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      So something that happened 15 years ago makes you claim that all cops NOW are ignorant?

      I said there are always a few bad cops, but to say the majority are clueless really irks me. We aren't living in the times of Andy Griffith, most cops have college degrees now. At least in my area, competition is high for any open positions on one of the forces.

      Sure what happened to you sucks, but you branded an entire segment of society based on one event. You wouldn't be too happy if I insulted what your dad did for a living without any basis, would you?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:We're all fucked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Likewise, one should be incredibly frightened at the concept of an officer who is equally ignorant or unconcerned about your rights being capable of investigating your most vital and private of information and communication.

      If you believe your computer and your use of your computer on the internet are private, then yes, you are fucked.

    6. Re:We're all fucked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical cop defenders. "You can't generalize." You know what? Most members of knitting clubs are old women. Oh fuck. That was a generalization. It must be incorrect.

      The irony of the concept that "all generalizations are incorrect" cracks me up. The difference between "most" and "all" is anal semantics so don't give me that shit either. Your argument is a generalization is unfair and invalid for the exceptions and I call bullshit.

      Considering the mentality that "you roll with them, you hang with them" among law enforcement, I don't have a lot of fucking sympathy when the good ones get caught up in the negative attention directed at their "blue brothers" that they happilly look the other way for. I've had my fair share of encounters with cops and if you want to give me shit for that relevant experience and or swearing you can shove it up your ass. I don't dance around the subject and I'm not going to hide the fact that this subject pisses me off.

      Being an asshole is practically a prerequisite of a job based on ruining people's shit, and if it doesn't attract assholes like flies, it sure as hell weeds out most of the non-assholes. Job/community culture is subject to group psychology and influences such as internal affairs puppet shows/lack of oversight/public opinion/lack of consequences. The Law Enforcement community claims to defend virgins and other noble deeds and as the hand of war against the enemies of public opinion is completely immune to criticism. If you are a relative of a cop, a cop, or never had any run-ins with cops outside of traffic stops, I would suggest that your bias makes your insight worthless.

      Offer an explaination if anything, but please, spare me the "who you gonna believe? Me or your own eyes?"

  25. Re:Alabama, where all the IT people go! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    different people get mod points. /. is not one big group think, and it never has been.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Secret Service, and being up to date by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    You're exactly right about the Secret Service. Keep going with that list. What is "currency" these days? Almost all the dollars in the world are computer records. Their anti-counterfeiting mission put them in the lead to deal with computer crime.

    Computer forensics has not changed beyond recognition in the last year, probably won't in the next year, and in any event a lot of investigations will on Windows 98 machines and others that are more than a year old. There will have to be continuing education classes to cover things like the new issues raised by mobile phones, but a good theoretical background (hash the media, preserve the evidence, check for malware) will cover most of the new technologies.

  27. Super Computers? by commisaro · · Score: 4, Funny

    But will this computers have the ubiquitous CSI "Picture Enhance" feature?

    1. Re:Super Computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call it 'MS Paint'.

  28. haha..no by geekoid · · Score: 1

    COputer will not change that much in a year.
    How much ahve they changed in the last year? in the last 3? not much, and a faster processor doesn't matter here.

    Of course, that's not the real issue, the real issue is determining how people use their computers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Re:Alabama, where all the IT people go! by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    I think it should have been "-1 Troll".

    troll

  30. Re:People have no idea how to *really* erase a fil by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    And then the name of the file is in several places in the registry, and linked to from the \Recent directory.

    I've told clients that using Windows is like being stalked by paparazzi.

  31. Cirriculum by syntaxeater · · Score: 1

    The following are requirements to get your BoCF (Bachelors of Computer Familiatrity)

    First Term: The Computer and You.

    - You will learn the basics of which components contain any data. Certain peripherals are not useful when seeking evidence. After this course; you will be able to identify the CPU during searches and also learn which components commonly have fingerprints on them.

    Second Term: Basic Computer Handling.

    - You will learn the basics of how to "unplug" (don't be scared, the class comes with a glossary of this and other "techie-talk" you might encounter) different components. Also, proper lifting techniques to prevent damaging parts.

    Third Term: Computer Showmanship

    - This class will teach you proper showmanship for the local newspaper photos after your successful seizure. For instance, "which way to face the computer" for the camera. Advanced students will also be allowed to open the computer up and learn what parts to point at for an even more dramatic effect.

    Fourth Term: Advanced Seizure Techniques

    - In some cases, the computer may be "on" or possibly have a "screensaver" running. This class will teach you the advanced techniques for getting the computer ready to be unplugged, lifted and taken a picture with. Graduates of this class applying things learned throughout the course have had much success in being able to seize a computer (successfuly) for the local news channel.

  32. Alabama? by gradster79 · · Score: 1

    Right, because when I think of cutting edge technology I think of Alabama!

  33. Zoolander, anyone? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    "There must be an on button somewhere? Did you press the apple thing?"

    ...

    "Did you find the files?"
    "I don't even know what they loo-- What do they look like?"
    "They're in the computer."
    "They're in the computer?"
    "Yeah, they're definitely in there. I don't know how he labled them."
    "I got it."
    "You gotta figure it out. We're running out of time. You gotta find them and meet me at the show."
    "Roger. In the computer. It's so simple." ...

    "We got 30 years of files right here in this computer that are gonna bring you down!"
    "Oh, no."
    "Down! (He smashes the computer) Where did all the files go?"
  34. Pros and Cons by PPH · · Score: 1
    On the positive side, I'd rather have the FBI/Secret Service/etc. reading my e-mail than a private contractor who might also be my competitor on various contracts.

    On the negative side, law enforcement has a pretty bad case of tunnel vision when it comes to looking for crime. Store any p0rn on the server and they'll sniff it out like bloodhounds. Evidence that friends of the current administration might be moving assets illegally to Dubai. Sorry, we didn't notice that.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Pros and Cons by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      It comes down to social priorities.

      If someone wanks to something that disgusts other people, they better damn well watch out because politicians and prosecutors make a living prosecuting you. Most of you are average middle class sorts and don't stand a snowball's chance in hell.

      However, if someone launders hundreds of millions of dollars into overseas bank accounts, everyone secretly thinks "damn, I wish I was him, he's really lucky" and prosecutors think "crap, he can afford a dozen high priced lawyers. The press will have a field day with my career".

      So while the diversion of money away from national defense and our economy may have an overall effect that is MUCH greater than the guy who wanks to some picture of a busty teenager, the public grandstanding that can be done after "getting a dirty perv off the street" is far higher than "I arrested this somewhat unknown, but wealthy, businessman for stealing money from Iraqi citizens".

      hehe

      No, I'm not cynical.

      Stew

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
  35. Why would they? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Really erasing a file takes a long time. The computer doesn't really erase memory either when it's freed up it just marks the space as free, it doesn't zero it (does on allocation though). There's no good reason to have an erase by default option, and many good ones not to. Hell, Vista even takes it a step further and uses your free space for old versions backups. No surprise, there's people who make big money (NetApp) selling things like that as a feature.

    If you want a secure deletion, well then install a tool to do it. MS provides a good one called sdelete and there's others out there.

    Basically, most people don't want to wipe their data out, it just takes extra time and gives them no benefit. If you do, then you should be able to do the minimum amount of research necessary to get the tools you need and disable the backups you don't want.

    1. Re:Why would they? by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      "most people don't want to wipe their data out..."

      Are you aware that paper shredders are very common in a business setting. For the same reason, business users, very much do want to wipe their data out. Forever - with no copies or hidden backups.

      I can cite many cases (Google them yourself) of business data falling into the wrong hands because of the "undelete" or "unformat" commands that make "file > delete" in Windows a joke.

  36. Re:Alabama, where all the IT people go! by abb3w · · Score: 1

    Subtlety improves the quality of humor. So, yes, yours is more troll than funny.

    Besides, banjo music is pretty funny in its own right.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  37. It's the Secret Service, with DHS funding by randolph · · Score: 1

    The Secret Service is a very effective police agency, and they'll probably do a good job of it. On the other hand, the DHS runs the TSA and the immigration service and has an appalling civil rights record. I can only hope that the Secret Service prevails in the operations of the Institute.

    Links
        Secret Service press release (PDF)
        DHS copy of press release (HTML)

  38. Followup to FCIC? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

    This isn't really new... anyone that has read Sterlings' "Hacker Crackdown (http://www.mit.edu/hacker/hacker.html) will know about FCIC and FLETC and their role in giving some structure to the 80's/early 90's law enforcement personnel (mostly Secret Service). Actually, I'll go slightly offtopic - and only slightly, since the chapter "Law and Order" goes directly to the topic at hand - and recommend taking an hour to read the mentioned book, *tremendous* insight on the relation between law, technology and civil liberties. It's a detailed account about "Operation Sundevil", which most people know about as the taking down of LoD and Phrack, and the creation of the EFF. I remember the turmoil in the scene back then, and the book does a marvelous job on describing the hacker culture of the 80's.

  39. In the immortal words of Mr. T by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

    I pity the fool who chose to work in computer forensics. 99% of standard law enforcement computer forensics is watching millions of images and movie clips of infants getting raped. Not my idea of a work environment suited for maintaining mental stability. If you wanna be a "anti-hacker superhero" then go work for the NSA. Outside NSA there really are only a few positions at the FBI, CIA and Secret Service that fits that description. Oh, and CTU Los Angeles.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:In the immortal words of Mr. T by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Although if you think about it... if there weren't lots of people to whom this sounds like a dream job, they wouldn't need the institute in the first place. Gotta wonder about the sort of people who sign up.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re:In the immortal words of Mr. T by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      You missed an entire segment of investigation, Financial. The IRS has a very nice computer crimes lab as well as the SEC. Neither of which are interested in finding the type of data you suggest. In fact if we do find anything related to a crime other than what we are investigating we must simply forward a "Tip" to the local law enforcement or FBI field office explaining that this individual should be investigated for this crime. This usually caused the current investigation to lag as the FBI/Local law enforcement now also has to take the machines and image them, It creates a chain of custody nightmare which can sometimes derail our investigation for some time.

  40. Damned Yankees.... by TakeArms · · Score: 1

    Don't tread on me...

  41. Re:People have no idea how to *really* erase a fil by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    From a previous discussion of 'securely erasing a HD' ISTR that 'powerful' is an understatement. You pretty much need an MRI scanner to be sure your data is dead. Consumer-grade magnets won't do.