Slashdot Mirror


Gnome 2.18 Released

xdancergirlx writes "Gnome 2.18 was released today (on time as usual). Detailed release notes are available. Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, bug fixes, and improvements."

64 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Gnome by xaositects · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gnome 2.18: Nothing special really, just somewhat improved infravision, an extra +10 bonus to detect uneven grades, worked out some bugs in the "failure to run from big scary trolls due to lack of common sense" department. Should be a somewhat more usable gnome.

  2. Gnome 2.18 with performance improvements! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to those I got first post!

    1. Re:Gnome 2.18 with performance improvements! by Mikachu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hah, first post. Bet you wish you were using KDE now, don't you. ;)

  3. Did they include... by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Did they include... by muszek · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFAIR they haven't, because they were submitted after the feature freeze (or some other kind of a freeze). Don't quote me on that, my memory is a tricy thing.

    2. Re:Did they include... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do I know? I've looked. Yesterday I even fixed it. I sent the patches off to add the capabilities. It's a shame he didn't, ya know, attach the patches to his email.. this whole "contribute it to the maintainer" crap is the problem with open source. If you see something you don't like, sure, contribute it to the maintainer to get fixed.. but if the maintainer drops your patch on the floor, don't go cry on the mailing lists, just make your patch publically available so other people who want the same feature as you don't have to recode it themselves. Jesus, Linus should know better.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Did they include... by macshit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus' patches don't "fix" anything.

      They remove an unnecessary and artificial restriction -- and also apparently simplify the code, which is always a good thing.

      they add one feature.. in particular, the ability to configure left, right and middle click to do what you like. Which, ya know, is useful to like 3 people.

      It sounds pretty useful to me... Obviously the MS-raised proles will never use it, but many more clueful people use Gnome too ("like, ya know").

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    4. Re:Did they include... by Wdomburg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. But some variant of the patches are in trunk for the next release. It really just adds a config option though. Not as big a deal as the brouhaha would suggest. :)

    5. Re:Did they include... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Gnome file dialog can turn anyone into a jackass.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    6. Re:Did they include... by lorien420 · · Score: 2

      If you really care, here's the tracker for his patches in Metacity's bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408898

      --
      "[We'll be] really getting inside your head and making it an unpleasant place to be" -- Trent Reznor
    7. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I like his 'Mac emulator' patch - it stops one mouse button from working altogether.

    8. Re:Did they include... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      Generally, less choice = better usability.

      In fact, probably 90% of usability is finding what people want to do and making it trivially easy. The stuff the majority don't want to do remains hard or impossible. It sounds a little strict, but it seems to pay off for, say, Apple.

      The reason Linus doesn't like it is because he wants every little byte to be configurable, like a lot of Linux users. That's fine; he can use KDE instead. The stupid things about this situation is:

      1) That people give a crap what Linus says about usability. He programs the kernel! The lowest-level component of the OS! He has no usability experience whatsoever. Have you seen the kind of GUIs that kernel programmers design? Look at anything from IBM, for instance. I understand that Linus is like an open source superhero, but you shouldn't trust Linus' opinion on usability issues any more than you should trust Superman's opinion on railway maintenance.

      2) That Linus uses GNOME and gripes about it instead of just using what he likes. Isn't the entire point of the open source ecosystem to give the user choices? Linus can hardly bitch if he doesn't bother to use an alternative.

        2a) Or (even worse) he uses KDE but chooses to go out of his way to bitch at some other open source project.

    9. Re:Did they include... by Daemonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      2) That Linus uses GNOME and gripes about it instead of just using what he likes. Isn't the entire point of the open source ecosystem to give the user choices? Linus can hardly bitch if he doesn't bother to use an alternative. 2a) Or (even worse) he uses KDE but chooses to go out of his way to bitch at some other open source project.
      Actually, Linus uses and prefers KDE but was raked over the coals for publicly stating that was his preference because of what he saw as flaws in GNOME. It was the GNOME groups complaints about his position and their general "You don't even contribute to GNOME" attitude that pushed him to start submitting patches.
  4. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personal security is now fully integrated into the desktop, allowing digitally signed communications, encryption of emails and local files, and user-friendly management of personal keys. Internationalization records progress in all directions, with support for vertical text layout and a full Arabic localization matching the quality standards. The official release incorporates essential tools for developers, which hopefully will contribute to get more and better software for the GNOME users.

    What's more important, for the first time we ship online games, chess with a 3D look, and endless Sudoku entertainment.

    Good thing we've got our priorities straight.

    1. Re:Priorities by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously they're being facetious.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Priorities by kurtmckee · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Good thing we've got our priorities straight.

      It's a problem of manpower. My understanding is that there was a sudden and unexpected number of Gnome documentation people who were unable to contribute as they have in the past, which is what prompted this post by Quim Gil calling for help.

  5. I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use both KDE and GNOME on a regular basis. I really don't have a preference either way; both allow me to get my work done well enough. But what I've noticed is that with each KDE release, it feels significantly more responsive than the previous releases. I can't say the same with GNOME. If anything, it seems to be getting slower as time goes on. I use OpenBSD, so I end up compiling all of the packages myself. I use the optimal C and C++ compiler flags for my particular system. It's not a matter of my using KDE packages built with a more recent version of GCC, or something like that.

    In any case, earlier today I built GNOME 2.18 on my system. I've been using it for a few hours now. And compared to the KDE 3.5.6 installation I was using earlier today, I think it's significantly slower. Evolution is far more heavy-weight than KMail. Nautilus takes longer to display directories. I have one directory with about 15000 photos in it. Nautilus crashes when viewing it, while with Konqueror I can easily scroll through the thumbnails within about a second.

    Maybe it's just a quality control problem with GNOME. While I don't follow the development mailing lists very closely, I've heard from co-workers that GNOME is suffering from some pretty serious organizational issues. Low-quality code is being accepted into GTK+ and GNOME itself, and many people are noticing a decrease in its quality as of late. Maybe somebody can shed more light on whether or not these rumors are true?

    1. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bug reports welcome. :-)

    2. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by yoyhed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And on top of all that, KDE is more configurable!

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    3. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by thephotoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The biggest problem I have with GNOME as a user is Evolution. Simply put, Evolution needs to be scrapped in favor of something else. Its Exchange functionality is non-functional, and its calendar could be easily replaced by something else. Why not just do what they did with the default browser and fork from Mozilla? Surely, it'd suck less.

      Nautilus is in dire need of a code audit, just to ensure that everything in there is up to par. Hells, if I were in charge at GNOME, I'd probably stop developing new features in Nautilus and work on the audit for the next cycle.

      Honestly, though, the one thing that hurts GNOME the most is the six month release cycle. If they'd even just use a single one-year release cycle, just to clean things up, they'd be in much better shape.

      All that said, though, GNOME is my desktop. It's what I learned first, and honestly, KDE's configurability just scares me. Also, I remember too well a time when KDE looked like shit out of the box. Thankfully, that's no longer a problem.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    4. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and honestly, KDE's configurability just scares me
      I used to be the exact same way. However, a few years ago I decided to sit down and configure KDE to my liking. Now that I've done so, I wouldn't even consider going back to Gnome. If you use your computer for hours every day, I would strongly suggest spending a bit of time to configure KDE. The relatively small amount of time it takes to configure everything to your liking is well worth it. In my opinion, it's a much better desktop environment and practically every KDE application is far beyond its Gnome counterpart.

      Also, with the focus on Mono applications, Gnome seems to be getting slower and even more bloated with every release.
    5. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by phrasebook · · Score: 5, Funny

      KDE's configurability just scares me

      I know what you mean. I had to configure my background in KDE once. Christ, it gave me THREE options! 'No picture', 'Picture' and 'Slide show'. I mean, WTF? I'm not a rocket surgeon.

      Then I wanted Konqueror to open links in tabs. People are right when they say KDE has a cluttered interface. It dragged me into Settings, then into something called Web Behaviour, and then forced me to click the box saying 'Open links in new tab'. After that I had to rest with 2 hours of TV.

    6. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AMEN! I just want to affirm what the parent is saying, I've heard people say "I've never noticed that" or "works fine for me" etc...it definitely feels slow.

      I've found KDE to feel simply -less- slow. Could some of this "slowness" be due to a lack of threading? I don't understand how it all works but my intuition was: if lots of services are working in serial and each has to send up a flag for the next to do something, and then nothing happens until the next service refreshes and checks up on the previous service to see if it's raised a flag (for instance say the mouse hovering over a menu item yet the item not lighting up; I notice lag in Gnome in this area _all_ the time), then what you could have is a collection of services that, while very efficient and fast in and of themselves, are slow when added together. Best example I can think of is an assembly line with 15 mutant workers-- each worker can transfer his load from one hand to his other hand instantly, but the next worker has to realize it's his turn to pick up the load and pass it on. 15 guys and this time adds up and you notice GUI lag. Whereas in Windows XP with threading (I never notice this sort of lag in XP that I notice in Gnome), it's like the first worker shouts "alright get ready" and then the time spent handing off and receiving the load between workers is greatly reduced. With lots of services shouting "get ready" this may slow things down, but not where it's important-- if it feels fast, then it is fast.

      Am I completely off the mark?

    7. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 2

      When I say "very functional", I mean that it reliably does what I need it to do.

      It does crash, but not regularly. I fire it up in the morning, use it all day for email (and occasionally to put things on my calendar), and then shut it down normally before leaving work. Maybe 2 or 3 times a week I'll get a message that some process has gone away unexpectedly, but I've never lost any data because of it. It only costs me the time it takes to read the message, kill any remaining evolution framework, and then restart evolution.

      Do I like evolution? No.
      Would I use evolution if I had a choice? No.
      Does it work well enough to use? Yes.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    8. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by mr_sas · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's one mono program in the default install (tomboy) and it's not running by default.

    9. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by disasm · · Score: 2, Informative

      regular GTK doesn't count; you can run that on KDE without installing gnome

      You're missing the point of the relationship between GTK and Gnome. Yes, a while back a lot of the important parts of the toolkit were gnome only (printers/druids/etc...), and at that time, gnucash was dependent on Gnome, but now a lot of that essential stuff is being moved into GTK2. This is a good thing (tm). Applications should be built around a toolkit, and not a window manager/desktop. The point of the window manager/desktop is to do just that, manage windows, and if you're weird and like having icons on your desktop, manage those to. The Toolkits are development interfaces. No sane person would learn all the ins and outs of their desktop's API to write a program. That's the problem we non-KDE users have with KDE. Every useful app built around KDE requires KDE (rather than just using a qt toolkit). You can't blame gnome for the 100's of programmers that write good software by not using desktops API's. The greatest advantage about GTK apps is if someone doesn't like the gnome desktop, they can ditch it for fluxbox or xfce which are also gtk based and run the same apps without any of the overhead of the desktop.

      But for the rest, KDE owns. KDE has amarok, k3b, and konqueror, all three of which are outstanding in their respective fields. And they're always talking about how KOffice 2 is going to replace OO.O and gimp.

      I personally only like k3b out of that list. Amarok and Konqueror drive me nuts every time I have to use them. K3B is a great solid app from a functional point of view. It's just a shame they didn't write it using GTK.

  6. Knome skin by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The big change is they went to a Knome skin that makes it look like KDE.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  7. Re:Yawn by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Riiiiight.. cause that summary really screamed hype to me. I see you got modded up too, moderators can't even be bothered reading the summary now?

    Fuckin' Slashdot.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  8. Nothing revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    As usual too ;)

    1. Re:Nothing revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I'm disappointed, too. From other software projects we've gotten used to 2.17 -> 2.18 transitions to be cataclysmic, jaw dropping and quite simply awe inspiring. The GNOME project has really let us down here...

  9. Re:I wonder if they took Linus's patches? by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does he have a problem quitting?

    --
    I've got your sig, right here.
  10. Re:Yawn by radarsat1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, bug fixes, and improvements.


    Yeah, god, I just can't STAND all this hype.
  11. Re:Underpants gnome? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was wondering where my tidy-whities went...

    It's 'tighty'. Those things definitely aren't 'tidy' after you leave that nice racing stripe in them.

  12. That's Nice by dduardo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, when are we going to see smart and innovative desktops that dramatically improve user friendliness?

    Just as some examples:
    • As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.
    • I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information
    • I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.
    These are some of the type of things that would make using a computer easier to use.

    Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

    It's the year 2007 and we have desktops with the same intelligence as those back in the early 80's.
    1. Re:That's Nice by imboboage0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the year 2007 and we have desktops with the same intelligence as those back in the early 80's.
      Yeah, but the people got worse.


      *ducks*
      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:That's Nice by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      Do you have any idea how difficult something like that would be to code?

    3. Re:That's Nice by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, so you better get started soon :-)

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    4. Re:That's Nice by OmegaBlac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any idea how difficult something like that would be to code?
      Of course he doesn't. If he did he would code it himself or pay someone to do it instead of whining on slashdot where the GNOME developers (or any devs of large desktop environment project) may never see his complaints. The GP would do better to post his wish list on the Gnome mailing lists.
    5. Re:That's Nice by module0000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your suggestions such as "extending applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another" is unfortunately not possible with our current(or dreamed-about) tech. Great concept, kudos for that, but the "frame" all desktop computing operates from just does not allow for this. You are not suggesting improvements to "desktop linux", but you are speaking of changes to desktop computing as a whole, across all platforms; it's not that 'easy', I wish it was. Concerning your suggestion about organizing photographs by similarities...this is not so impossible. It's not particularly easy once again, but a very rudimentary sorting algorithm could be conceived from light conditions, hard lines(etc a persons profile), this could be worked on. As far as the mp3's...I'm afraid that entirely too subjective to the person listening to them. My mood and tempo desires may differ and most likely do, from yours, and yours from your neighbors. This is a question of personal preference, and I don't see mp3 players administering a standardized personality test to guess at your flavor of mood, out of the X number of popular mood categories. Last but not least...I'm afraid there were no desktop os's HOME users even had access to in the *early 80's*. You could go banging over Xerox's door for their machine, or maybe even dear Mr. Gates'. However, in the early 80's, such hardware would cost you [somewhere near] $30,000? More?

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    6. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A, mostly because different programs use different data models. It's not impossible, at least not in a limited way, but it would hinge more upon app developers than the desktop environment.

      B, because machine image recognition is an area of tricky tricky research and requires serious computational power. Note that spammers have yet to defeat the wonky text + squiggly lines test for posting on slashdot. And thats just OCR. (While people with very limited intellectual capacity seems to make it through in hoards ;)

      C, same as above. Pandora used human experts to classify the music.

    7. Re:That's Nice by kurtmckee · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, when are we going to see smart and innovative desktops that dramatically improve user friendliness?

      Just as some examples:

      • As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply thinking things into existence? i.e. Dragging and dropping Blender into Gaim?
      • I have 1000s of photographs and I hate metadata. Why can't my computer automatically recognize people's faces and group the photos accordingly? Why can't it analyze the hairstyles and figure out when the photo was taken, and why can't it automatically scan the photos for logos and figure out where the photo was taken?
      • I have 1000s of mp3s and I hate metadata. Why can't my software use voice recognition to figure out the lyrics and then create a playlist using a Bayesian filter? I can filter spam out of my inbox, I should be able to filter ARTIST UNKNOWN out of my GENRE UNKNOWN playlist!

      These are some of the type of things that would make using a computer more like using deep black magic.

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows users to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

      It's the year 2007 and I want my computer to be more like the computers in the sci-fi movies I saw in the early 80's.

    8. Re:That's Nice by massysett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tagging MP3s: Musicbrainz has projects to automatically tag MP3s with metadata on track name, album, etc. As for tagging them with mood: good luck; however All Music Guide has been working on this sort of thing for years; see also Last.fm. Integrating these into a desktop would be nice, though your comparison to "Microsoft tunnel vision" is quite harsh seeing as open source desktops have long had features that Windows sorely lacks, such as transparent SSH file transfers, thumbnailing of PDFs and other non-photo documents, and viewers for multiple file types, embedded right into the file manager.

    9. Re:That's Nice by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your suggestions such as "extending applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another"

      That's why we always keep going back to the command line shell where you can do a grep on the output of just about anything. The GUI has a place but I'd rather send an entire file through sed with a short command than move the mouse to the first character of every line, right click, and scroll down to delete, then left click as I have seen some purely bound to the GUI do.

      The biggest problem with the other examples above is you have to tell the machine what to do sometime - hence the metadata. You would have to tell the stupid machine in simple terms just how to identify the catagories to sort into.

    10. Re:That's Nice by AaronW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      KDE offers some of this, though nothing like dropping Blender into Gaim. In KDE, most applications are also components and can be easily embedded inside other applications. For example, Konqueror is not so much a web and file browser as a container. I.e. I click on a Word document and it opens it in the browser using kword, or I click on a MP3 and it can use Amarok, or a photo brings up my preferred photo viewer inside the browser.

      As far as not requiring metadata for MP3s, Amarok already supports this (another KDE application). It calculates a sound fingerprint of the file and uses the Musicbrainz database to try and figure out the song. Not only that, but I can bring up lyrics, the CD cover and even Wikipedia entries on the band in question. It's pretty amazing.

      As far as grouping photographs, I don't know anything open source that does that based on picture content.

      -Aaron

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    11. Re:That's Nice by dduardo · · Score: 2, Informative

      1983: Apple Lisa

    12. Re:That's Nice by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      Sounds like Apple's OpenDoc?

      It didn't work because:
      1) They released it too early and it quickly gained a reputation for being too buggy.
      2) The only application that really embraced it was ClarisWorks. Oh, there was some lame web browser Apple made that used it too called Cyberdog, IIRC.

      The idea isn't *bad*, but it really needs a killer app around it to make it work. An app better than ClarisWorks/Cyberdog.

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

      Yup. Open source seems to lack a lot of designers-- without designers, you have to program based on established designs. Designs from a company like, say, Microsoft who solved all those problems before. KDE and Windows, in the default configuration, look almost identical. Say what you want about Apple and Microsoft, but at least Windows and OS X don't look and work identically.

  13. Re:Yawn by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The way the post hyped it up, I was expecting something actually exciting.

    WTF? The post even says "Nothing revolutionary in this release".

    If that's hype, you must suffer from spontaneous ejeculation at a repubrocrats/demican rally.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  14. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by thule · · Score: 2, Interesting

    KDE's KWallet has offered similar support for years. In combination with other KDE programs, such as the KMail mail client and the Kopete instant messenging software, KDE users have had access to such features for ages.

    I did not see in the KWallet docs (http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdeutils/kwallet/in dex.html) anything about it being a frontend to gpg. KWallet appears to be closer to the gnome password manager than the newer gpg management feature. Since I removed KDE from my system a year and a half ago, I cannot verify this.

    These features were supported back in KDE 2!

    I didn't see anything in the KDE 2 notes about supporting vertical text. Though it could be they didn't specifically mention it.

    Yep, KDE has offered such functionality for years. KDevelop is an extremely mature software development environment. It's of a far higher quality than Anjuta, and offers a far greater number of features.

    Most definately true. KDevelop is a pretty nice program.

  15. Re:Scroll Wheel by muszek · · Score: 3, Informative

    System -> Preferences -> Mouse
    I'm using Ubuntu 6.10 with Gnome 2.16

  16. 3D Chess is everywhere! by pizzach · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the release of GNOME 2.18, it appears there has been a change in the playing field. In order to be considered to a full fledged modern OS, a Three-Dee Chess program must be included with every new operating system. The Release of Mac OS X seems to have started this trend. Microsoft soon followed suit with Windows Vista. Now there is Gnome. Will KDE be pulled into this madness, or will it fall behind into oblivion?!

    Apple Chess

    Windows Chess

    GNOME Chess

    Feel free to flog me now.

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
  17. GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by babbling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm looking at this screenshot and thinking that it looks quite good. People often complain about the brown in Ubuntu being "ugly", and Ubuntu has stated that they don't want to be "just like Windows" by going for blue. Well, based on that screenshot, I think green would be a good choice.

    1. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I will stick with blue because it sooths, calms and refreshes me so that I don't smash my monitor in uncontrollable rages.

      I thought green was better at soothing psychopathic behaviour. It's also suppoosed to be easier for people with various types of dyslexia to read and absorb information, so yeah, go green

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    2. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by tuxicle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Green reminds people of SuSe/Novell, I suppose

  18. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "KWallet appears to be closer to the gnome password manager than the newer gpg management feature. Since I removed KDE from my system a year and a half ago, I cannot verify this."

    Sounds like you're looking for KGpg then.

  19. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by thule · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the thing they were going for in gnome is to start integrating, not just password management, but identity management. Thus, Gnome's new feature manages both gpg and ssh keys.

  20. That's Not Release Notes by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's not "detailed release notes", that's marketing spin. Release notes would mention specific apps, like evolution, and specific fixes, not just buzzwords and superficial brags about how the experience is better.

    Such marketsprach has its place. But the release notes are even more important. And even more important is not pretending that marketsprach is release notes.

    If GNOME release managers don't release that by themselves, then the project is in serious trouble.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  21. Actually, in a roundabout way.. by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not fully automated, but we live in the internet world where an encyclopedia written by Wiki is among the most used references in the world...

    Namely, I'm talking about MusicBrainz. Programs will analyze and produce a fingerprint, and MusicBrainz will do a fairly good job of matching that fingerprint to the track. From there, tempo, mood, etc could all be community stored info. More esoteric tracks suffer, but as Wikipedia shows, things that don't work well in theory can sometimes work surprisingly well in practice... Esoteric tracks generally have a more fanatical/enthusiastic fanbase to offset their lack of popularity. Hell, such a system could one up the GP's requested behavior and be able to make recommendations of tracks based on community opinion, both implicit (tracks that tend to be submitted by the same people and rated highly) and explicit (users specifying related tracks).

    The photograph conundrum he poses is harder, since generally photographs are personal things. The low-hanging fruit of Date taken and some other things is handled by EXIF data most cameras record, and most photo managers deal with, but looking at similarities in photographs without context is more along the lines of the difficulty you bring up. Some heuristics would probably do interesting things, but a lot of environments will look too similar and sometimes related images couldn't be picked out by a person without any context. For example, a pictures taken of a landscape with some buddies on a road trip would group with some other buddies on the same roadtrip in a bar, no one could ever tell they belonged together without knowing the group and/or the circumstances. Simple fact is, if you have time to take your pictures, you have to be ready to organize them if you care, because no one or nothing could ever do a sufficiently accurate job on such individualized data.

    On the drag and drop a widget (in his example 'search'), that seems goofy and impractical. Drag and drop a text-entry widget that happens to be a search into an app with multiple child panes, wtf do you search? What if the child widgets don't have any text to export, or else format it differently? Anyone adding a search widget to most structures knows the complexities and pitfalls, occasionally it is a simple 'add toolkit search and do what makes most sence', but if your program is doing things that people care about, the situation is almost always too complex for that.

    However, specifically to his search inquiry, things are being tackled in a more structured way. I.e. beagle is intelligent about the filesystem and a number of popular programs and how they manage data, and how it makes sense to organize it. A popular app emerges and developers who know how to index it right and present it have to manually add the intelligence to do the right thing, and it's effective at keeping up because of a sufficiently healthy development community.

    However, in a more general sense of applications sharing features more intelligently, the good old pipes of the command line set the precedent here. NeXT brought that into the GUI world and extended it to know more about the context of the data and whether the operation was applicable before a user selected it. They were/are called services. I.e. you have a text editing application. It had a menu item called 'dictionary'. Well that menu item was actually a third party app that registered itself under the name 'Dictionary'. That same menu item and app would also appear in your Terminal application, letting you spellcheck your *nix commands, since that would be so effective... Probably also in the file management that dictionary item would appear. If you had text in the active context, it would spellcheck that. If it were a file, it would know and spellcheck the file. It's similar on a very basic level to the right-click context menu in windows explorer, but much more flexible and pervasive. Don't know how well it would scale in a highly competitive software market place (many companies wanting a 'Search for related info' menu item would undoubtedly happen and then it gets interesting), but it seems like the best approach to get close to what he describes.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  22. Re:Scroll Wheel by big_groo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right. Check that to see if you can change your scroll wheel sensitivity. Google it too. Good luck.

  23. Re:On time as usual... by davydmadeley · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a pretty good reason to be late. You wouldn't want to discover that someone had compromised the source tree and left something nasty behind, better to be safe than sorry. It's the only time it has ever been late, and for what it's worth, it was ready to ship on time.

  24. Re:i've got a picture of it here by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Christ. Not only did that squirrel give the gnome an entire basketful of red, painful-looking chancres, but it also ate off his left hand. And he's *smiling*. That's one badass gnome.

  25. Gnome 2.18 Released by baomike · · Score: 3, Funny

    and with any luck it wont come back.

  26. Slow news day by ari_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have to love it when things get so slow around here that we post story blurbs that explicitly say they aren't news.

  27. Is GNOME stagnating? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, there were no major new features in 2.16 either. Is it just me or is GNOME.... stagnating? How about continuous versioning backup-tool? Infrastructure already exists, someone just has to create a GUI and tie it to the desktop. How about something like OS X's Expose? How about being able to re-arrange items in the Taskbar? How about looking in to Gimmie as a Taskbar-replacement? There are tons of useful features they could add to the desktop, but no. What do we get instead? "Using Tomboy to create lists is now as simple as adding a * or a -." Ooooooh, I have been waiting for THAT feature for a long time!

    This release gets a big fat yawn from me. Like 2.16 did as well.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GNOME rules because it doesn't stop me from running third-party software that provides functionality GNOME is missing? Well, isn't that mighty nice of them?

      Look, kid, don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say GNOME rules. What I said is that the functionality you want isn't in metacity and you're going to need Beryl to get there. It's all Free and free, so I'm not sure what you're complaining about.

      In fact, I don't think you really understand the Unix mindset, which is that everything starts small and simple, and you build more complex tools from the smaller tools. Come with me over to Sun-land for a moment for a prime example that has nothing to do with Linux. A lot of people think that Solaris is an operating system. It is not! It is a distribution of SunOS. It happens to be just about the only distribution thereof, but regardless, I shall continue; Solaris is the combination of SunOS, the operating system, and today GNOME (but formerly CDE, and before that OpenWindows), the windowing system. Both of these are made up of smaller packages. For example, Solaris today includes GNU tools. And the windowing system consists of the X server, the windowing environment, and the assorted X clients.

      In other words, you're complaining about a non-issue. You don't run GNOME on its own. Arguably, you don't run GNOME at all - it just runs for you when you log in with a GNOME session. What you're running (when you turn on the computer) is the distribution. If it doesn't include Beryl, you don't get that functionality. Big whoop. Find a distribution that includes the things you want (although I don't know of anyone actually including beryl at this point) and run it. You'll get your Expose-like functionality.

      You can complain all you want about how GNOME doesn't do everything you want it to, but what you're missing is that if you use Free Software instead of Apple or Microsoft proprietary stuff, you have the ability to swap in any window manager you like instead of being stuck with what you're provided.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"