Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Building Computers That Run on Light

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics. A $1.6 million research project starting in June at the University of Bath is focused on developing attosecond technology, which refers to continuously emitting light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second."

31 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Attosecond pulses of light? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing to see here... Brilliant!

    1. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Just reminded me of that old commercial... )

      Look fast! The hands on this watch are about to... disappear! That's because they aren't hands at all! They're Electronic!... Pulses!... of Light!

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  2. Light bulb by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can give you all the attosecond pulses of light you want -- as long as they're all ones.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Light bulb by omeomi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can give you all the attosecond pulses of light you want -- as long as they're all ones.

      or all zeros...

  3. Re:gghz by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >So whats that a giga-gigahertz?
    Exahertz, EHz.

  4. Perfect! by DJCacophony · · Score: 3, Funny

    now all those case modders will have their lights built in!

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  5. For you folks in the US by wilsonthecat · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is England, Europe.

    1. Re:For you folks in the US by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Land of Eng? WTF is an Eng?

    2. Re:For you folks in the US by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      WTF is an Eng?

      Someone who lives in England, obviously ;) Seriously though, it comes from Land of the Angles, named after the germanic settlers from Angeln, in what is now Germany. They, along with the saxons were the predominant cultural group* in what became England, prior to 1066; collectively called Anglo-Saxons. Anglo-saxon is now a term often used to refer to the white western world from Britain and it's former colonies; as opposed to Hispanic or Gallic - you may have heard of WASPs...

      *This is disputed; some historians/geneticists argue that the people were largely neolithic settlers and celts, while only the elites were supplanted by a few percentage ruling settlers from the continent in succesive invasions by romans, angles & saxons, vikings, normans, etc.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  6. No more Van-Eck security risks by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I for one would embrace such a revolution.

    Modern photonics, if it works within a computer, will make it impossible to eavesdrop on a computer with a van-eck style of a attack. Granted, van eck phreaking a VGA cable may be doable (barely), and performing similar snoops on a motherboard may seem incredibly difficult even by today's standards, it is within the realm of possibility. Take a look at the field of acoustic cryptanalysis and its potential.

    Now extend that into the electromagnetic spectrum, give yourself a very powerful broadband software defined radio and a good isolated faraday cage, and could it be possible to mount a similar attack electronically?

    If photonics take over, we will for once be in a safe-zone of knowing once and for all that no overly powerful overseeing entity will be able to eavesdrop on any kind of electromagnetic emissions, so long as you don't have any light leaks.

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    1. Re:No more Van-Eck security risks by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If photonics take over, we will for once be in a safe-zone of knowing once and for all that no overly powerful overseeing entity will be able to eavesdrop on any kind of electromagnetic emissions, so long as you don't have any light leaks.

      Doesn't matter. Most meaningful cracking has a social component anyway. Or based on easily deduced patterns of human behavior. Or the fact that 'p@55word' just isn't as tricksy as some people seem to think.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  7. Oh fuck by joto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics.

    No, they aren't! The article didn't mention desktop computers at all. As expected, this is basic research on photonics. The researchers are nowhere closer to build a desktop computer that run on light, than they are to build a desktop computer that runs on steam and valves. Whether it is the submitters or editors who are idiots is hard to tell, but my guess is that both of them would score pretty well on that scale! Maybe we should build desktop computers of them?

    1. Re:Oh fuck by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 2, Funny
      My desktop computer runs on steam, and has several valve products installed.

      You insensitive clod!

      --
      for sale
      I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    2. Re:Oh fuck by Philotic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of idiots! Actually, on second thought... don't...

    3. Re:Oh fuck by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you hear? They made one. Called it 'The Internet'.

  8. They're All Wet by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny


    They're all wet. The University of Shower has already disproven most of this. Even the lesser known School of Sponge Bath has taken a "dim" view.

    I know, I know. "Light"en up...

    Stop me now before my Karma takes a Bath.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:They're All Wet by dsanfte · · Score: 3, Funny

      His lucky is what, now?

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  9. Consumable resource by Ikyaat · · Score: 3, Funny
    So if it runs on light would it make light a consumable resource?

    What happens when we run out of light and have to look for alternative sources of lightergy?

    --
    "Luck is a tag given by the mediocre to account for the accomplishments of genius." -Heinlein
  10. This is the first I've heard of this. by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had not heard of this before. I guess I must have been in the dark.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week.

  11. Re:gghz by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't a billion-billionth of a second be one second? I would have said billionth of a billionth if I didn't want to use an uncommonly large prefix.

    A billion-billionths of a second = 1 second.

  12. No Electronics???? by dunc78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't RTFA, but hey, this is slashdot, it wouldn't be the same if I did. It is great to see that people can process light without the use of electronics.

  13. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by adtifyj · · Score: 3, Informative

    The all-optical transister is not imaginary.

  14. Bogus science? by purify0583 · · Score: 3, Informative
    After reading the real article from the Uni of Bath site containing these few sentences...

    The continual series of short bursts of light will not only dramatically affect technology - it will also advance physics by giving researchers the chance to look inside the atom. and

    By sending the light in short bursts into an atom, they will be able to work out the movements of electrons, the tiny negatively charged particles that orbit the atom's nucleus. Heisenberg what? Hrm.. Well the story seems to really be about the fact that they got a really phat grant for their optics research, but they appear to be really far away from doing anything new or building anything practical. So Im guessing that they really arent really trying to violate Heisenberg; it probably just PR grant-getting lingo (the whole article is littered with it...from atto-second to optical computing to medical lasers). Congrats on the grant, but Im sort of disappointed there is nothing newsworthy other than the fact that they got a grant.
  15. Re:gghz by podwich · · Score: 2, Informative

    A billion billionths of a second = 1 second.
    A billion-billionths of a second = 1E-18 seconds.

  16. Re:In the long term by LincolnQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has anyone studied the possibilities of programming using bidirectional logic?

    Feynman has. In his _Lectures on Computing_, he talks about the ramifications of bidirectional gates (reversible computing, but with a cost in complexity) in the context of entropy conservation. It's pretty interesting stuff.

  17. Re:Yeah... by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does it run Linux?

    Or Quake?

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  18. Attosecond? by plasmonicfocus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be legitimately called attosecond pulse, it must be shorter 100 attoseconds (10^-16 seconds). That would mean that one would need > 10^16 Hz of bandwidth just to obey basic fourier analysis, giving us a center free space wavelength of 30nm. It is pretty hard to call such an electromagnetic wave 'light', seeing as it is so deep into the hard UV, it's almost an x-ray ( 10^16 Hz of bandwidth.

    1. Re:Attosecond? by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because something is light, does not make it visible light. Technically speaking, x-rays are a form of light. Admittedly a realatively useless for computing form of light, but still.

  19. The beginning of the end by Monk+Who+Says+Ni · · Score: 3, Funny

    Light? In my IT dungeon?

    Surely this is an act of war against pasty code monkeys.

    --
    Its the amazing technicolor cheese wedge!
  20. speed of light by dten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Might such a computing system display any fun behavior if carried aboard a vessel approaching the speed of light?

  21. Re:Depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's really only the engineers. The rest of us (academics at least) prefer metric. Metric is now taught in the school systems, and all science classes expect students to use the metric, not the standard system. Engineers though don't move so fast, partly due to backwards compatability. Retooling every factory in the US is a problem, so they don't, but then everything is still in standard, so the new factories are in standard to... etc. etc. It's sort of like the internet switching over to IPv6. Because no-one can, or at least is willing, to say "on this day a giant switch will be flipped, and the world will change" the switch just doesn't happen at all.