Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Building Computers That Run on Light

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics. A $1.6 million research project starting in June at the University of Bath is focused on developing attosecond technology, which refers to continuously emitting light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second."

18 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Attosecond pulses of light? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing to see here... Brilliant!

    1. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Just reminded me of that old commercial... )

      Look fast! The hands on this watch are about to... disappear! That's because they aren't hands at all! They're Electronic!... Pulses!... of Light!

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  2. Light bulb by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can give you all the attosecond pulses of light you want -- as long as they're all ones.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  3. Perfect! by DJCacophony · · Score: 3, Funny

    now all those case modders will have their lights built in!

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  4. For you folks in the US by wilsonthecat · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is England, Europe.

    1. Re:For you folks in the US by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Land of Eng? WTF is an Eng?

  5. No more Van-Eck security risks by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I for one would embrace such a revolution.

    Modern photonics, if it works within a computer, will make it impossible to eavesdrop on a computer with a van-eck style of a attack. Granted, van eck phreaking a VGA cable may be doable (barely), and performing similar snoops on a motherboard may seem incredibly difficult even by today's standards, it is within the realm of possibility. Take a look at the field of acoustic cryptanalysis and its potential.

    Now extend that into the electromagnetic spectrum, give yourself a very powerful broadband software defined radio and a good isolated faraday cage, and could it be possible to mount a similar attack electronically?

    If photonics take over, we will for once be in a safe-zone of knowing once and for all that no overly powerful overseeing entity will be able to eavesdrop on any kind of electromagnetic emissions, so long as you don't have any light leaks.

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
  6. Oh fuck by joto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics.

    No, they aren't! The article didn't mention desktop computers at all. As expected, this is basic research on photonics. The researchers are nowhere closer to build a desktop computer that run on light, than they are to build a desktop computer that runs on steam and valves. Whether it is the submitters or editors who are idiots is hard to tell, but my guess is that both of them would score pretty well on that scale! Maybe we should build desktop computers of them?

  7. They're All Wet by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny


    They're all wet. The University of Shower has already disproven most of this. Even the lesser known School of Sponge Bath has taken a "dim" view.

    I know, I know. "Light"en up...

    Stop me now before my Karma takes a Bath.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:They're All Wet by dsanfte · · Score: 3, Funny

      His lucky is what, now?

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  8. Consumable resource by Ikyaat · · Score: 3, Funny
    So if it runs on light would it make light a consumable resource?

    What happens when we run out of light and have to look for alternative sources of lightergy?

    --
    "Luck is a tag given by the mediocre to account for the accomplishments of genius." -Heinlein
  9. This is the first I've heard of this. by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had not heard of this before. I guess I must have been in the dark.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week.

  10. No Electronics???? by dunc78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't RTFA, but hey, this is slashdot, it wouldn't be the same if I did. It is great to see that people can process light without the use of electronics.

  11. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by adtifyj · · Score: 3, Informative

    The all-optical transister is not imaginary.

  12. Bogus science? by purify0583 · · Score: 3, Informative
    After reading the real article from the Uni of Bath site containing these few sentences...

    The continual series of short bursts of light will not only dramatically affect technology - it will also advance physics by giving researchers the chance to look inside the atom. and

    By sending the light in short bursts into an atom, they will be able to work out the movements of electrons, the tiny negatively charged particles that orbit the atom's nucleus. Heisenberg what? Hrm.. Well the story seems to really be about the fact that they got a really phat grant for their optics research, but they appear to be really far away from doing anything new or building anything practical. So Im guessing that they really arent really trying to violate Heisenberg; it probably just PR grant-getting lingo (the whole article is littered with it...from atto-second to optical computing to medical lasers). Congrats on the grant, but Im sort of disappointed there is nothing newsworthy other than the fact that they got a grant.
  13. Attosecond? by plasmonicfocus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be legitimately called attosecond pulse, it must be shorter 100 attoseconds (10^-16 seconds). That would mean that one would need > 10^16 Hz of bandwidth just to obey basic fourier analysis, giving us a center free space wavelength of 30nm. It is pretty hard to call such an electromagnetic wave 'light', seeing as it is so deep into the hard UV, it's almost an x-ray ( 10^16 Hz of bandwidth.

    1. Re:Attosecond? by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because something is light, does not make it visible light. Technically speaking, x-rays are a form of light. Admittedly a realatively useless for computing form of light, but still.

  14. The beginning of the end by Monk+Who+Says+Ni · · Score: 3, Funny

    Light? In my IT dungeon?

    Surely this is an act of war against pasty code monkeys.

    --
    Its the amazing technicolor cheese wedge!