Slashdot Mirror


Registerfly's Accreditation Terminated by ICANN

Punker22 writes "Effective immediately ICANN has terminated RegisterFly.com's accreditation. Between now and 31 March RegisterFly is required to unlock and provide all necessary Authinfo codes to allow domain name transfers to occur. Any and all registrants wishing to transfer away from RegisterFly during this period should be allowed to do so efficiently and expeditiously. 'Terminating accreditation is the strongest measure ICANN is able to take against RegisterFly under its powers,' Dr. Paul Twomey, President and CEO of ICANN said today."

111 comments

  1. story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a little backstory wouldn't hurt

    1. Re:story? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      See the search box in the top right corner, try typing in registerfly . . . you'd be surprised what those search thinggies do.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:story? by dindi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Short:

      2 owners got into power struggle. One locked the other out, the other locked everyone out.

      Effect:
      1. you cannot renew domains,
      2. Support cannot help (just promise)
      3. You do not have auth codes to move your domains away
      4. Finance system does not work
      5. domains are changing data randomly -> dns settings

      For me: my domains were to expire, so I deposited money. Renewal failed, money disappeared, domains expired.
      I spent hours on the phone, they promised to renew manually. Now whois shows it is renewed, Regfly shows it is not. Info changed back to their nameservers and "expirefly".

      So some of my domains I renewed and I paid for are making pay-per-click for them, losing ranking and customers, and I cannot even change the nameservers or transfer them, because they show up as "expired" in their system.

      Just make a search for "registerfly" and you will see all kinds of horror stories.

      I am looking at spending over $400 for unnecessary renewals, and who knows what in revenue. I am in the process of finding a good lawyer and see what I can do about this mess :(.

      I fear though, that for the time a lawsuit would go through they would declare bankruptcy and retract to their Miami Beach villas (yes one owner lives there).

    3. Re:story? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I fear though, that for the time a lawsuit would go through they would declare bankruptcy and retract to their Miami Beach villas (yes one owner lives there).

      People get confused about the protections of a corporation. It protects investors that aren't involved in the decisions. If the two owners caused the trouble, and it would be possible to prove in court (provided you subpoenaed the right documents), then sue the company and name the owners as co-defendants. You can't sue owners just because you think the company will go bankrupt. But you can sue the person at the company who made the decisions that harmed you (regardless of whether they are owners). That way, you can get judgements from the owners directly. If they have director/officer insurance (nearly all do) and you have a reasonable case, you will get quick cash. Insurance companies know that settling is cheaper than a court battle, no matter who wins. And if it does go to court, you'll get your losses, and your lawyer will have a nice new Miami Beach villa. If the company declares bankruptcy, as well as both owners and neither had appropriate liability insurance, then you'd be screwed, but I think the chances of that are relatively small, not to mention the changes in bankruptcy laws designed to screw the little guys would actually hit them (it's harder to get judgements wiped away via bankruptcy now).

    4. Re:story? by dindi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. To be honest, I would go relatively far to take legal revenge on this pile-of-trash company. They caused me so much trouble in the last 4-5 weeks, and causing everywhere from 10-90 minutes of extra work every day (transfers, email checking, try to change data in the defunct backend, support calling, whois lookups, changes after transfers.....

      It is at the point when it is interfering with my 9-5 job, and adds a stable extra layer of stress on top of my not-so-relaxing admin 9-5 and private coding 5-9 :) ...

    5. Re:story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For amusement check out http://www.registerfly.net/ --- Kevin Medina has completely lost control of his network. Disgruntled employees leaked information to black hats and I would love; LOVE to be a fly on Kevin's wall right now. Although http://www.registerflies.com/ has NOTHING to do with the vandalism, we did receive an anonymous tip that something amusing is going to be happening to http://www.registerfly.com/ in the next few minutes as well.

      If the back story is what you are after, if you search Google for RegisterFly, http://www.registerflies.com/ is the second hit and we have most of the details posted there (or if you are lazy you can click one of the linkies provided in this article). Now that RegisterFly is dead, it is amusing in retrospect.

      Although we did warn ICANN late Thursday of the security breaches, RegisterFly is still vulnerable and all ICANN could do was yank their accreditation. For your own sake, if you have credit card numbers in your RegisterFly account at this time, IMMEDIATELY log into your account and remove that information. RegisterFly is now a playground for crackers and script kiddies.

  2. So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been trying to transfer my fiancee's small business domain from them over to DynDNS for about a month with no success. I tried initiating the transfer through GoDaddy's management tools (which seem to be really geared towards domain squatting, btw) and found nothing useful. It's a real rat's nest in there. Initiating the transfer from DynDNS got us nowhere. No transfer request notification is ever sent by GoDaddy, and everything silently fails a week or so later.

    She's so frustrated with it that at this point, she'd rather wait for the domain to expire and just re-register with someone else. Understanding how easy it is for someone to snatch up a freshly expired domain, I'm thinking that's a bad idea.

    Has anyone else had a similar problem (or success?) trying to transfer away from GoDaddy? We are running out of ideas.

    1. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that there is a long waiting period between when a domain expires and you can pick it up. I have never been able to grab an expired domain.

    2. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by elmarkitse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you tried calling into GoDaddy? Whenever there's an issue I can't resolve online, calling them produces great results. Try to lay off the 'you work for soul-less domain squatting evildoer company' when you ring in and just mention you'd tried to do a few transfers with no success. Their CS people will give you their name, an e-mail, and a way to get back in touch with them unless someone treats them like crap.

      For domain management, their interface is great, especially if you have more than just a few domains. I have about 150 or so (no squatting, thank you) and basically just ignore everything about them except for the domain control panel.

      If you just want to use DynDNS services, just point the domain's nameservers and you've got all the benefits without what has apparently been quite a hassle for you. I have transferred in and out of Godaddy well over 50 domain names and the only times I've had problems are with odd TLD extensions, usually because I don't have the right auth codes, and almost always from the other registrar, not GoDaddy.

      Good luck

      EK

    3. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Informative

      Might be able to find help @ nodaddy...

      --
      [o]_O
    4. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by dindi · · Score: 1

      If it is expired, you are screwed, if not:

      go to "manage domains" -> click domain ->

      1. unlock it: "domain lock" on the right unlocks it
      2. get auth code: domain contact information -> see bottom
      2. make sure email is yours. If you used domain privacy, it points to support@registerfly.com, thye never answer mails or approve requests

      I used Joker and successfully xfered 2 of my most important domains, 30 more to go.... I lost a few it seems as they are unchangeable and not renewable.

      So Joker works, but keep in mind: you pay even if the xfer fails, so make sure your domain is unlocked, you are the contact, and you have the right auth code.

      WARNING: auth codes are not domain codes you get from regfly when a renewal fails !!!!!

    5. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by Nethead · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have 150 domains with Godaddy then you should look at BlueRazor.com, the wholesale side of GoDaddy. I signed up for it and have saved a boat-load with my 30 odd domains. Same interfaces and customer support (even the phone number.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    6. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      Really, most of them are all the same. Took 3 months to get one of our old domains transferred from Register.com to our main registrar at work. That included numerous emails, phone calls, and at least two "do overs" starting the transfer process from scratch because "Something went wrong, sorry but you are going to have to re-submit the request". I can't even describe how frusterated I was with the process.

    7. Re:So when is it GoDaddy's turn? :p by elmarkitse · · Score: 1

      https://account.bluerazor.com/gdshop/legal_agreeme nts/show_doc.asp?prog_id=bluerazor&app_hdr=0&pagei d=MEMBER_EULA

      That part seems a bit draconian. I agree to let them charge me arbitrary fees for things like customer service? Yikes. But interesting, thanks for the heads up.

      EK

  3. How about some back story as well? by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1

    Great we know the outcome... bur how about a link to the REASON as well. "Management Issues" doesn't seem like something to yank a certification over.

    1. Re:How about some back story as well? by Southpaw018 · · Score: 0, Troll

      In the time it took you to type up that complaint, you could have Googled it yourself or even skipped Google and go to Wikipedia for the answer.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    2. Re:How about some back story as well? by AngryNick · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:How about some back story as well? by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Did you see the "related stories" links underneath the summary?

  4. Tucows by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now, if they would only follow suit with Tucows.

    I have a domain at with of their resellers which can not be contacted. (In fact their site certificate expired last October.) Unfortunately, Tucows offers absolutely no recourse, and the phone number listed in the whois will let you sit on hold forever, and eventually (after an hour or so) spit you into a voicemail box, which goes unanswered. Likewise, the email contact forms simply forward to the resellers. Very useful.

    The reseller is domainsnare.net, which is also related to mailsnare.net. Not recommended...

    1. Re:Tucows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess they certainly 'snared' your domain eh :(

    2. Re:Tucows by mmurphy000 · · Score: 1

      Now, if they would only follow suit with Tucows.

      In your situation, Tucows is closer to eNom, with domainsnare.net serving in the RegisterFly role. Apparently, RegisterFly used to be an eNom reseller, got dumped by eNom, then went through various gyrations en route to being canned by ICANN.

      From your description, it sounds like Tucows doesn't handle deadbeat resellers as well as eNom (which apparently contacted RegisterFly's customers and gave them transfer options). However, I don't think the actions of a single deadbeat reseller should cause the "death penalty" from ICANN against Tucows. If this is a pattern, and Tucows has lots of deadbeat sellers, I'd be interested in pointers to them -- I'm thinking of becoming a reseller myself and had been leaning towards Tucows over eNom based on other reviews.

    3. Re:Tucows by funfail · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is the exact problem? You can try logging into your control panel directly at the OpenSRS (Tucows) site, skipping the reseller:

      https://manage.opensrs.net/

      The same username & password that you use with the reseller should work.

    4. Re:Tucows by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      and if the reseller locked the domain?

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    5. Re:Tucows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that Tucows doesn't appear to have any customer service whatsoever. Don't take my word for it, if you have a domain there, or are planning on registering with them, try your luck. I spent a significant amount of time drudging through their web site and phone menus, with nothing to show for it.

      Thankfully, even if it is unmanned, the interface still seems to be running. I was able to renew at the last moment, but god help you if you lost your password, or your domain is locked. I did find the opensrs page just recently, and thankfully, that page does have the Transfer Authorization number that you need to initiate a transfer; not present on the reseller site though!

    6. Re:Tucows by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      Further to funfail's message that you can log into the opensrs console directly, bypassing your "registrar," you can also email compliance @ opensrs.org to get your domain unlocked.

    7. Re:Tucows by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Then you can unlock it in OpenSRS. At least take a look at it before you babble on.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:Tucows by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      I wish OpenSRS would allow unlocking. I have 2 domains registered back in the day at TPP Internet in Australia. At the time, they cost $5US each to reg, now they want close to $80US to renew. TPP's control panel doesn't have the ability to unlock, either. So I'll be forced to wade through their customer support hell to get them unlocked so I can transfer to Godaddy with the rest of my domains.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    9. Re:Tucows by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Then you can unlock it in OpenSRS. At least take a look at it before you babble on. Actually, I'm an OpenSRS reseller, and us resellers have the ability to suppress the lock option from being displayed on manage.opensrs.net. If your reseller has configured their stuff that way, you will not be able to lock or unlock it yourself.

      You can tell whether or not this is the case by logging into manage.opensrs.net with your domain name, username, and password, then clicking "Domain locking" -- if you see the following text, your reseller has prevented you from doing this yourself:
      NOTE: Locking cannot be enabled/disabled from this interface. Please contact your domain supplier for assistance.

      Tucows policy clearly states that if the registrant and reseller are at odds over whether or not a domain should be locked, the registrant shall prevail. If I were in this position, I would call them directly at 1-800-371-6992.
  5. W T F Moment by jrwr00 · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show you how strange the Internet is, i say there should only be one person that does the registration of domains, and not all these half-baked companies

    1. Re:W T F Moment by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      That was how it used to be. If you wanted a domain, you could register at Network Solutions and pay $35/year. I'm generally happier with the state of affairs now, though I wish people would go after squatters and domain snatchers.

    2. Re:W T F Moment by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      I wish people would go after squatters and domain snatchers. Don't hold your breath. On the contrary, they're being actively encouraged — by the "Do No Evil" giant, no less. It's a disaster.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    3. Re:W T F Moment by iaculus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't "one person that does the registration of domains" be a single point of failure? imo the internet's greatest strength is how distributed everything is. Remember how everyone was suggesting wikipedia solve their bandwidth woes (link) with a P2P-based hosting system? On a tenuously related note: During my brief fling with SEO, a lot of people were claiming that domain name just isn't that important any more. Being on the first page of relevant google searches is going to do a lot more for most sites than having a great domain.

    4. Re:W T F Moment by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show you how strange the Internet is, i say there should only be one person that does the registration of domains, and not all these half-baked companies You mean like it was when Network Solutions did it? Back when you had to provide your own nameserver and manage your own DNS? Great for those of a technical bent with access to a nameserver, but useless if all you wanted was a domain name pointed at your DSL IP address.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:W T F Moment by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, you want it to be really cheap to register domains, but you don't like squatters. Can't have it both ways, dude.

    6. Re:W T F Moment by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. Cheap to register one domain, progressively more expensive to register additional ones.

    7. Re:W T F Moment by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. Cheap to register one domain, progressively more expensive to register additional ones.

      But you have to make a definition of an entity in order to assess that, and lets face it, there are plenty of ways around that. Any solution to that is going to be such a hassle to implement I doubt it's worth doing.

      Better IMO to have a reasonably large fee to register a decent tld (eg .com) - enough to discourage squatters but no more, and have cheap tlds that people can use for other purposes.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    8. Re:W T F Moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like it was when Network Solutions did it? Back when you had to provide your own nameserver and manage your own DNS? Great for those of a technical bent with access to a nameserver, but useless if all you wanted was a domain name pointed at your DSL IP address.
      Yes heaven forbid if you find that having a technical bent is useful when you want to put a computer on a network in such a way that other computers can locate it based on input from their users. Oh, and "access to a nameserver" comes with any Linux distribution and the freely available BSDs, yeah wow that really raises the bar HIGH doesn't it?
  6. http://revolutionanryleft.com had a problem too by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

    With Registerfly. Glad to see they finally get what they deserve.

    (The problem was around December last year and was fixed without the help of Registerfly. Fuck 'em.)

    --
    I wank in the shower.
    1. Re:http://revolutionanryleft.com had a problem too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing is that they didn't even spell the domain name right!

    2. Re:http://revolutionanryleft.com had a problem too by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      thanks for spamming your piece of shit website, asshole. we're all interested in your bullshit. You're not being very polite.

      Just in case you didn't notice.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    3. Re:http://revolutionanryleft.com had a problem too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it because you misspelled your domain name in the online form?

  7. Thanks! by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

    I like the link thingies better. :)

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    1. Re:Thanks! by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Well, just to make you happy, you'll find some of those nice little link thingies just below the "Related Stories" heading!

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  8. Political Issue by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A lot of people don't like GoDaddy because they gave up to pressure from some corporation or another and killed an offending domain. But I've had nothing but good luck with them. Their management tools are leaps and bounds better than many of the other services I've used, and just 100's of miles ahead of most of the free DSN joints. I've transfered dozens of domains without issue.

    Your dislike of GoDaddy for political reasons may be valid, but functionally, they aren't bad at all.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Political Issue by Nezer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I refuse to use GoDaddy simply because I find their television ads offensive and degrading to women.

    2. Re:Political Issue by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Wait till you accidentally forget to renew your domain. Each one is held hostage by an $89 "Redemption" fee.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find GoDaddy's control panel cumbersome and slow. I'm happy with namecheap.com (bad name, great management interface)...

    4. Re:Political Issue by Dissman · · Score: 1

      They do it because it gets attention. It gets them two kinds of media, both earned and unearned (paid for). Not only do they get the commercial, they get the press talking about it for a month. If it *didn't* get them attention they wouldn't do it.

    5. Re:Political Issue by VGPowerlord · · Score: 5, Informative

      A lot of people don't like GoDaddy because they gave up to pressure from some corporation or another and killed an offending domain.

      More accurately, they caved to a DMCA request from News Corp because a list of MySpace passwords were posted on the full-disclosure mailing list, which seclists.org archives.

      You can see the seclists.org posting and the /. coverage of it for more details.

      What's more, GoDaddy offers to unlock domains it has shut down for a fee. I don't know about where you come from, but where I come from, we call that "extortion."

      Here's where things went wrong. (Note: IANAL) In order to file a DMCA with GoDaddy, GoDaddy's relationship with Seclists.org would have to be subject to one of the first four provisions of Title 17 Section 512.
      Those are:
      a. Transitory Digital Network Communications (i.e. network routing, No)
      b. System Caching (No)
      c. Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Direction of Users (No, it's not hosted by GoDaddy)
      d. Information Location Tools (Not by the definition given in this section, which is linking to it from a search site/directory)

      So, where is News Corp claiming to get this justification? For that matter, since when do passwords fall under copyright?
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    6. Re:Political Issue by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Wait till you accidentally forget to renew your domain. Each one is held hostage by an $89 "Redemption" fee.

      That's why I have auto-renewal. It's a business, there to make money. NetSol is worse, but yes, I'll agree $89 is steep. On the other hand, if I forget about my domain for so long that I'm out of the grace period, who's fault is that?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Political Issue by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should re-read the articles I link to, seeing as they even say there was no takedown notice issued.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    8. Re:Political Issue by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Lets see how much you care about their web interface if someone with a lot of money should start to dislike anything you do with your domain.

      Besides, how often does one really need to use the web interface at their domain registrar? Reneweing, transfering, updating the list of DNS servers for the domain... not things one does very often.

    9. Re:Political Issue by Improv · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but it doesn't mean that people have to stand for it. If some attention-hungry kid on a playground acted that way, we wouldn't expect people not to shun them just because from a certain POV it's reasonable.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    10. Re:Political Issue by daeg · · Score: 1

      Except 90% of their "tools" are useless. Unless something has changed in the past year or so, you have to click through half a dozen pages of advertisement simply to renew a domain. YES! I'm sure I don't want to host with you! No, I don't want a shopping cart! No, I don't want "private registrations"! No, I don't want to renew other domains!

      If you're just looking to register domains with GoDaddy, their "tools" get in the way. Every page looks like it's designed by the same people that design glossy flyers that clog your mailbox every day -- giant, full page, ads.

    11. Re:Political Issue by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I was told the same thing, but when I went back to renew after the expiration period, there was no mention of that fee, and I wasn't charged it. I'm guessing the OP having trouble getting a domain away from them has the domain "locked" or something. Such a large and seemingly reputable company can't make a habit of ignoring transfer requests.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    12. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are overreacting.

      -- Candice Michelle

    13. Re:Political Issue by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Killing a domain is not a political issue. It is a bussiness issue. One cannot run a reliable service if there is a chance that your domain might be pulled for arbitrary "offensive content"

      That said, I have had no trouble with godaddy. The only reason I began to switch was thier increasing annoying registration process. It was just easier to register at another provider, a provider that gave extras for almost the same money. In particular I did not like the fact that godaddy encouraged people to register domains for the sole purpose of flipping them. I hate to want a domain only to find that someone has picked it up just to flip it.

      It was in fact that process of looking for a less hostile registration process that lead me away form Godaddy. One of the places I tried, cheapnames.con, looked very similar to Godaddy. On surmise,with no evidence, this lead me to believe that godaddy might be losing lots of customers due to customer service issues, and rather than fix the service, they created another firm to try to catch them on the backend.

      In the spirit of not putting all ones eggs in one basket, I have been using two registrars for the past year. I am now happy with the new provider, and recetly tried to move my last domain to the new provider. In spite of all my efforts, godaddy will not let me transfer. No matter. The domain expires soon, and I will not be in a hurry in go back.

      You see, there are no political issues, just customer service issues. Although I was happy at godaddy, another service gives me a better value with less annoyances. All too often the paranoid business community creates these conspiracies to cover up their own incompetence and greed. They think that the liberals or conservatives are out to get them, when in fact the business leaders have just let their personal political beliefs distract them from the core function of a firm, which is to provide a good value in goods and service to the customer. Pretty much more of the US is agnostic enough not to care if the CEO is worrying the sheep, as long the value is good. It is, more often than not, the short sighted firms that brand themselves as "christian" or "conservative" or whatever in hopes of attracting those few people that shop on solely on the basis of politics. It can be a good strategy, because those people will buy the goods and services no matter the quality of price. Just look at Whole Food market, which I also like, but has gone down since it has become hip and mainstream political.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:Political Issue by phredgreen · · Score: 1

      Read your TOS. You get up to 12 days pasty expiry before you have to pay anything more than your renewal rate. If you don't respond to the more than six emails you receive as the domain comes to, reaches, and passes its expiration date, you have noone to blame but yourself.

    15. Re:Political Issue by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      My domains auto-renew using my credit card. If your domains expire and you lose them then the only one you have to blame is yourself. You can renew domains well in advance if you want, or just set them up to auto-renew.

    16. Re:Political Issue by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Besides, how often does one really need to use the web interface at their domain registrar? Reneweing, transfering, updating the list of DNS servers for the domain... not things one does very often.
      You're right, we should go back to the days when Internic made you use e-mail forms for all that shit. Ah, those were the days when updates took days or weeks and all domains were $35. People that pay $35 for a domain name are chumps.
    17. Re:Political Issue by hendridm · · Score: 1

      I don't like GoDaddy's control panel. I always thought it was clunky getting to the DNS records (A, CNAME, etc), and navigation was goofy. Also, I think their WHOIS Protection/Privacy service is quite a bit more expensive that some of their competition.

      Beyond that, at least you can be comfortable with registering a domain with a company that will probably be around for awhile. And although I've heard some complain about their customer service, I gotta figure it can't be any worse that some of the crap I've experience with some of their competition (although I'm very happy with my current primary registrar).

    18. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's how this works in .com and .net. When the domain reaches its expiry date with being explicitly renewed, Verisign automatically adds a one-year renewal to it and charges the registrar $6 for the renewal.

      If the domain transfers out or is deleted within 6 weeks of that happening, the renewal fee is refunded to the registrar.

      So the registrar may wait for a while and then just delete the domain, or take it to sell to another customer. If they delete the domain, they get their $6 back and the domain enters a redemption period which also lasts for 6 weeks. Any time in that 6 weeks the registrar can restore the domain, which Verisign charges them $40 for.

      Basically, if you let your domain go past the expiration date, you're playing with fire. The registrar has been charged money for your domain that they have not collected, and it could strongly be argued that they own the domain and can do whatever they want with it.

    19. Re:Political Issue by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      You're right, we should go back to the days when Internic made you use e-mail forms for all that shit. Ah, those were the days when updates took days or weeks and all domains were $35. People that pay $35 for a domain name are chumps.


      I don't know about you, but I'll take those days over the days of loosing your domain to anyone who can write a DMCA takedown notice.

    20. Re:Political Issue by Tinik · · Score: 1

      Their checkout page now have a link to "proceed straight to checkout" or something like that, skipping all their "special offers."

    21. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      By that logic, WOMEN are degrading to women. GoDaddy advertises by using a big breasted model. Women dress provocatively, flash it all on myspace, go on webcams, wear practically nothing at clubs and when hanging around... why? To get attention, jobs, exceptional treatment. So I guess you don't like women, either... because they're offensive and degrading to themselves.

    22. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably bleed out of your ass once a month too.

    23. Re:Political Issue by johnlist · · Score: 1

      I am actively looking for a replacement for my current registrar. Any way you can let me know which two registrars you are using now?

    24. Re:Political Issue by wprowe · · Score: 1

      Passwords are not copyrighted. They are a right of privacy. News Corp was protecting the privacy of its users, which it has a legal responsibility to do.

    25. Re:Political Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I refuse to use GoDaddy simply because I find their television ads offensive and degrading to women."

      Interesting, because their television ads are precisely the reason *why* I use them.

  9. Horror stories from RegisterFly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. 404? by 6Yankee · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the first linked article above:


    RegisterFly.com, which according to ICANN has its offices at 4th Floor, 404 Main Street, Boonton, NJ


    With that address, what did people expect? :-)

  11. Obviously they're jumping to attention. by Oshawapilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FWIW the Registerfly main page still displays the ICANN logo, and based on a little experimentation a short while ago it seems that I could still register a domain there if I was so foolish to want to give them my money.

    They seem to be taking that letter very seriously.

    1. Re:Obviously they're jumping to attention. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      C'Mon a quote. Like so.

      Sure there are other registrars out there cheaper. Some actually are willing to make pennies over cost or worst(sic) yet lose money on each domain sold just for the sake of market share, NOT RegisterFly. We are in this business for the long haul.
  12. What political reasons??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The grandparent post does not mention any political reasons... why did the parent get modded +5.

  13. Mod parent up by nostriluu · · Score: 1

    While OpenSRS's interface is clunky, at least you have this option.

  14. whats going to happen to the dog by gsn · · Score: 1

    Effective immediately ICANN has terminated RegisterFly's right to use the ICANN Accredited Registrar logo on its website. Funny how they seem to be paying no attention whatsoever. In fact if you look at their site its just business as usual... I wonder if this constitutes phishing now.

    Really all I want to know is what happened to th $6000 chihuahua and if someone will manage to pick up Michael Jackson's website because the news is always exactly 758.34% more entertaining when Whacko Jacko and chihuahuas are involved.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:whats going to happen to the dog by hattig · · Score: 1

      I doubt they have many employees now. I certainly know that if I was a developer at that company I would have left by now given the past month or two's shenanigans. It's probably just a few admin staff and people working out their notice period now...

  15. Re:http://www.revolutionaryleft. had a problem too by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

    No worries M. Coward. I hope you enjoy your day as well. Actually, talking about bullshit, I don't have a bull. But can I interest you in some of my shit? If yes, I'll take some photos and upload them for you. Fine matured shit.

    --
    I wank in the shower.
  16. Re:http://www.revolutionaryleft. had a problem too by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

    True, but it is spelt correctly in my URL link that is under my name. And that is good enough for me. :)

    --
    I wank in the shower.
  17. GoDaddy has a special page... by graznar · · Score: 1

    Go to http://godaddy.com/registerfly and get a special rate and they'll petition ICANN directly for you.

    --
    [ check out my ruby book @ http://ww
  18. Namecheap by baadger · · Score: 2, Informative

    See where you can find your EPP auth codes in the RegisterFly control panel

    I had heard very good things about Namecheap for sometime so I transferred all my RegisterFly domains there this morning and everything went smoothly. For those interested in Namecheap, use coupon code "marchmadness" to get $7.99 transfers instead of $8.88. This coupon code isn't associated with me in anyway.

    1. Re:Namecheap by shakestheclown · · Score: 1

      I use Namecheap as well, and always use a similar coupon code. Never had a problem with them, and they seem to have a good reputation unlike most of the competition.

  19. Ugh. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    I feel terrible for those people whose records are actually lost; keeping their domains will be next to impossible. It seems like, with that many contracts in play and the willful destruction of data, that Kevin Medina ought to be liable for at least money, if not jail time...

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  20. Re:http://www.revolutionaryleft. had a problem too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ANUS pwns RL.

  21. RegisterFlop by hendridm · · Score: 1

    It's amazing. Several years ago I had about 20 domains with them. I transferred there from another eNom reseller because I fancied their WHOIS Protection service (I believe they were one of the first to offer it. GoDaddy had it at the time, but it was $9/year. RegFly had it for 99 cents on sale).

    Anyway, I was happy with their features and price for quite a long time. Their control panel always had some issues, but I still thought it was a good deal. Then, about a year or so ago, they really started sucking. I was experiencing MASSIVE control panel issues, where features were getting turned on-and-off at will, and I couldn't get changes to stick. Eventually, I just got sick of it all and went to a new register.

    Looks like I missed out on when things REALLY got fun :)

    Now I usually just switch between NameCheap.com (for domains I care about) and 1and1.com (for throwaway, testing, and speculative domains). (PS, I wouldn't recommend 1and1 unless you're a cheap bastard who doesn't mind a little frustration with their strange control panel and customer service).

  22. The Marketplace is not always right by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried initiating the transfer through GoDaddy's management tools (which seem to be really geared towards domain squatting, btw)

    Well, duh. That's what happens when you make domain registration an open market. Registration is not a complicated product, so the only way vendors can compete is price. The natural result is a service like GoDaddy which charges a few bucks for a single registration, and provides a corresponding level of service. And why is it news that they facilitate domain squatting? They (and a lot of other registrars) have been advertising cheap bulk registrations for years. And why shouldn't they? If we say, "Compete any way you can", this is the natural result.

    If it were up to me, we'd go back to one having one registrar that charges $35/year for every second-level domain. No, better yet, raise it to $100 a year. Allow the registrar a reasonable profit, and put the rest of the money into something useful: research, or bridging the digital divide.

    Shazam! No more domain squatting. It's not longer profitable. And that single registrar has every incentive to provide good service: if they don't, they lose their cash cow.

    "No way! Why should I have to pay that much for my personal domain name??!!" Hey, if a vanity web site is that important to you, you should shell out. If not, get a third-level domain. When a web site contains nothing but family photos and rants about gun control, nobody cares whether its on JoeBlow.com or JoeBlow.CheapISP.com.

    But of course that's never going to happen: ICANN couldn't possibly stand up to all the whinning that would result. So we're stuck with the current situation, and there's no use complaining about companies like GoDaddy. So you're just going to have to live with domain squatting. And remember that when it comes to registering your domain, you get what you pay for.

    1. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by mike2R · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sheesh, next your going to say that there should be some point in the different tlds, with .com used by commercial entities etc. Maybe you'd actually like these rules to be enforced!

      Where would the internet be today if we allowed it to be based on sensible, commonly agreed, standards?

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    2. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by evilviper · · Score: 1

      one registrar that charges $35/year for every second-level domain. [...] Shazam! No more domain squatting. It's not longer profitable.

      Except for the fact that domain squatting started, and was the most prevalent, back in the old days, when that was EXACTLY the situation. More money means fewer typo-domains, and the like, but squatting any common name/brand URL is guaranteed to return tens of thousands of dollars.

      nobody cares whether its on JoeBlow.com or JoeBlow.CheapISP.com.

      Except you're now at the mercy of CheapISP, and have no way to transfer to another service provider.

      And you know where that's going to lead... Somebody buys com.com, and starts selling names more cheaply, until they get lots of users locked in, then raises their price through the roof.

      An open and inexpensive DNS system is simply far better in many ways than any of the alternatives. I could understand making .com expensive, but only if also keeping less desirable TLDs, like .net, very cheap. It's funny how they approve numerous new TLDs, but keep the prices higher than the standard ones, eliminating any possibility of the new TLDs becoming popular/standard/etc., and therefore at all valuable.

      And remember that when it comes to registering your domain, you get what you pay for.

      Except for the fact that expensive registrars can be incredibly crappy, and cheap registrars can be damn good...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that domain squatting started, and was the most prevalent, back in the old days...
      You mean there are fewer domain squatters now than 10 years ago? Who told you that, Elvis?
    4. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      This is insightful?

      Registration is not a complicated product, so the only way vendors can compete is price. The natural result is a service like GoDaddy which charges a few bucks for a single registration, and provides a corresponding level of service.

      GoDaddy is not a monopoly. Nobody is forced to register through them. If you don't like the level of service you get from GoDaddy, go somewhere else. If there's a demand for higher levels of service (with correspondingly higher fees), someone will provide it.

      If it were up to me, we'd go back to one having one registrar that charges $35/year for every second-level domain. No, better yet, raise it to $100 a year. Allow the registrar a reasonable profit, and put the rest of the money into something useful: research, or bridging the digital divide. Shazam! No more domain squatting. It's not longer profitable.

      Except that we had domain squatters back when there was only one registrar (Network Solutions), and they charged $70 per domain. If a good domain can earn you $1000 (either through adsense, or by re-selling it), the difference between $10 and $70 in registration fees is trivial. Jacking up domain fees isn't going to stop domain squatting.

      And that single registrar has every incentive to provide good service: if they don't, they lose their cash cow.

      How do they "lose" it, exactly? Who takes it away from them? And if they do lose it, who gets it? Is someone supposed to set up a registrar company that isn't allowed to sell domains, on the off chance that the one company that IS allowed to sell domains loses its franchise?

      I can't imagine how anybody could think that having a single monopoly vendor would result in better levels of customer service. Back when the domain system was "pay Network Solutions whatever they ask for", we didn't exactly live in a Golden Age of customer service either. If anything, opening the system up has made it possible for vendors who do care about customer service to exist. If they don't, maybe there just isn't a demand for them.

    5. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so a volunteer organization would have to pay $1000/year for 10 measley domains?

    6. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The big problem with your concept is that joeblow.cheapISP.com is only good until cheapISP.com goes tits-up -- then Joe Blow not only has to find new hosting, he ALSO has to retrain his entire audience to go to joeblow.newISP.com

      Second, not all noncommercial domains are "vanity domains". Many are very useful to their owners and site-visitors, as a means of sorting out content by type and/or topic.

      The real cure wouldn't be to raise the price of the ordinary domain out of the average person's reach -- that's just elitist crap.

      No, the real cure would be to prohibit registrars from holding/reselling any domains (including by their subsidiaries and partners) that they aren't actually using for their own business. That way registrars couldn't squat domains. As it presently works, the fox is guarding the henhouse.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The big problem with your concept is that joeblow.cheapISP.com is only good until cheapISP.com goes tits-up -- then Joe Blow not only has to find new hosting, he ALSO has to retrain his entire audience to go to joeblow.newISP.com
      And for the typical vanity site, that's not exactly a big deal. You just have to tell the 20 or so people who access the site that the URL has changed!

      Second, not all noncommercial domains are "vanity domains". Many are very useful to their owners and site-visitors, as a means of sorting out content by type and/or topic.
      And if such a domain is useful to a large number of people, $100 is not an unreasonable price to pay for it.

      The real cure wouldn't be to raise the price of the ordinary domain out of the average person's reach -- that's just elitist crap.

      The average person can't afford $100 a year? Jeez, the economy's in worse shape than I thought!

      Seriously, though, nobody who's running a non-vanity web site is going to balk at an extra $100 a year. Consider that even the cheapest DSL service costs about twice that per year. (Nobody can manage a serious web site using dialup!) And then there's hosting: the minimum you can expect to spend (assuming you just want to host a few static pages) is $60 a year. Real shared hosting (with CGI and databases) costs about $200 a year.

      But if you really have thousands of people accessing your web site, you probably need to get a dedicated server. Minimum cost: $2K a year.

      So, somebody's spending thousands of bucks to keep their web site up, yet you say it's "elitist" to make them spend $100 for the domain name. Grow up.

      No, the real cure would be to prohibit registrars from holding/reselling any domains (including by their subsidiaries and partners) that they aren't actually using for their own business.

      Ah, the class 90s disconnect: only evil socialists take money from people, but spending money you don't have is perfectly cool. You don't want to charge more than token fees for domains, but you want to spend huge sums enforcing rules as to how those domains can be used.

    8. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Spam free?

    9. Re:The Marketplace is not always right by mike2R · · Score: 1

      heh, nice to see someone still has a sense of humour..

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
  23. GD control panel sucks by tit0.c · · Score: 1

    You like their control panel?? I hate that slow,clunky thing with all my heart.I liked their previous one much better.
    And coupled with all the Godaddy horror stories Ive been hearing lately, its making my decision to transfer my 50+ domains to namecheap and moniker (never keep all your eggs in one basket).

  24. RegisterFly hasn't turned over the data to ICANN by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    ICANN had already invoked the "provide backup copy of registrar data" provision of the Registrar agreement, which requires that, on demand, any registrar provide ICANN with a backup copy of the registrar's data in a standard format. RegisterFly didn't comply.

    That data isn't lost, though. There's a source of backup WHOIS data. Try DomainTools, which maintains copies of all WHOIS and DNS data. So if you need to prove domain ownership after RegisterFly shuts down, there's a way.

  25. DreamHost is offering RegisterFly refugees a deal. by Another+AC · · Score: 1

    I just saw on their site a pop-up.. RegisterFly refugees can use the promo code "FLYAWAY" to get a year of their L1 hosting (like 200GB of storage, 2TB of transfer/month, free registration) for free from now until the end of the month..

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of other registrar/hosts do things like this to "help out" what's left of their customer base!

  26. Re:DreamHost is offering RegisterFly refugees a de by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of other registrar/hosts do things like this to "help out" what's left of their customer base!

    If I may put in a plug for my registrar - Namesdirect, a/k/a Mydomain.com. I've been with them for eight years, smooth and stable operation. Recently had a problem transferring a domain name from 1&1internet to Mydomain, but after an email and phone call, they straightened it out.

    While I have no experience with the registrars mentioned here, I think the problems described are bound to happen when a business tries to sell its product or service too cheap. This is why I won't deal with Godaddy. Their Superbowl ads might be interesting, but those come with a huge cost, and I think that money would be better spent on the business infrastructure, rather than flashy "cool" advertising. I just think back to all the dot coms that advertised on the Superbowl in 1999 - almost every one disappeared by 2001.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  27. This was a lovers quarrel! by CarnageAsada · · Score: 1

    The co- owner's were gay lovers and after there personal relationship soured things went south. One of the partners wanted to buy into RF for 500,000 and the transaction went all the way to having the stock shares printed and than the jilted lover did not cough up the 500,000 and that was when he made the allegations of lipo and prostitutes and fancey cars as he stole the company right out from under the owner Kevin. Kevin took him to court and the the court rightly ruled that Kevin's partner's stock was null and void and that Kevin was the rightful owner. This was a week ago and yesterday ICANN stripped RF. Here are the court documents : http://www.registerflies.com/docman/cat_view-11.ht ml/

  28. Wrong... by msimm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two heads, who happened to be ex-lovers got into a fight. One (John) in conjunction with a board member fired the other (Kevin). This went to court just last week I believe. Kevin holds majority owner ship of the company and was awarded control once again.

    Meanwhile ICANN was had issued several notices to correct these issues are lose accreditation. This week ICANN made good on its threat. A lot of people lost domains due to problems RegisterFly started having long before the news picked this up.

    Mike Zupke from ICANN has stepped in and has been helping RegisterFly customers obtain authorization codes on locked accounts (with a good deal of luck). Likewise eNom, whom RegisterFly was originally a reseller, has been helping customers who were unaware of the shift (eNom terminated its agreement with RegisterFly effective I believe at that start of this month) retrieve domains RegisterFly had hold of (ProtectFly, RegisterFly's whois/privacy service made some of this more difficult).

    Renewals for clients that were eNom registered (though the reseller program) probably didn't even realize RegisterFly wasn't in fact their registrar (RegisterFly communicated the eNom's whois through a backend API, so you could manage domains seemlessly without realizing it).

    Auth code can be difficult to get, but no matter what now that ICANN finally has stepped in a little patience and you will get your domain.

    The best single source for real information is RegisterFlies who apparently intend to stay on after the end of this debacle and become a source for information and help with other domain registry issues. They have a big help and there are a lot of people there going through the same thing.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Wrong... by dindi · · Score: 1

      That is the other story I can read here and there, you might be right on that, I am nost sure at this point.

      Auth codes are now available on the contact info settings page of your domain. However if they expired because of them, this info is not visible and they do not give it out.

    2. Re:Wrong... by msimm · · Score: 1

      Dindi, If your had exparation issues *chances* are you hold some eNom accounts (do a whois lookup on your account and you'd see "whois.enom.com" towards the top). The reason things got so botched up as far as I can tell is largely (although I'm sure not strictly) because of eNom and RegisterFly's falling out. People who's domain contact was up-to-date or not obfuscated using ProtectFly (RegisterFly's whois protection service had some serious issues) *should* have recieved email notices last month being asked to chose on registrar or the other (eNom or RegisterFly). Failing to do so (like I did) combined with the termination of RegisterFly's reseller account (along with the ability for *their* backend to update eNom whois information) cause a lot of problems.

      If that's your boat then contacting eNom is your best bet. They're have been some stories of eNom asking rather outrageous fees to reinstate expired domains (which many RegisterFly customers thought they'd renewed, but after eNom canceled their account updates from RegisterFly where impossible). Somewhere in the neighborhood of $160. But if I understand it right, that only applies to domains that have been expired 30 days or longer. My domain was a simple $9.99 renewal, although it had been expired for over 2 weeks.

      If you are having issues acquiring auth codes for an RegisterFly account go to RegisterFlies and read the second most recent update (regarding RegisterFly) and contact Mike Zupke at ICANN. They are slow, but they are still ICANN. RegisterFly can't refuse auth codes at this point. All domain status has been locked since ICANN work with all the main TLD holders to help keep this situation under control until it could be sorted out.

      So somewhere, there's a little light at the end of the tunnel. Very interesting situation and it will have a serious impact on ICANN (who will be discussing this at their Lisbon meeting towards the end of this month. That's a very good thing.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  29. Re:NamesDirect by stevel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You must have either a short memory or you missed out on all the fun. NamesDirect suffered a massive meltdown of its DNS servers a few years back, leaving hundreds of thousands of domains in the dark for a week or more. They did not have sufficient capacity or redundancy in their servers and did not communicate with their customers for days. Perhaps it's better now, but as soon as I could, I transferred my domains out of there and would never return.

    The registrar I've had the best luck with is eNom, though I left them for Registerfly a coup[le of years back (mainly because of pricing.) 10 of my 11 domains are out of Registerfly now (to a mixture of eNom and 1&1.)

    I do use Dreamhost for hosting most of my sites and they've been good to me.

  30. GKG.NET offers $5.99 transfers... by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1
    I noticed last week, that GKG.NET is offering all RegisterFly customers a chance to transfer to them for only $5.99. That's better than GoDaddy's $6.95 price. I see that they have also lowered their transfer price from $7.49 to $6.95!

    Not bad. I have all mine at GKG, and have never had a problem with them.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  31. Re: Registerfly still says "ICANN Certified" by dsmall · · Score: 1

    This is interesting:

    In the article, there's this quote:

    Effective immediately ICANN has terminated RegisterFly's right to use the ICANN Accredited Registrar logo on its website.

    (snip)
    "Terminating accreditation is the strongest measure ICANN is able to take against RegisterFly under its powers," Dr. Paul Twomey, President and CEO of ICANN said today.

    However, over at registerfly.com, we see:

    http://registerfly.com/info/benefits.php

    "Quick Facts

    Founded in 2000
    ICANN Accredited
    100% Debt Free
    ( and etc, etc)"

    Wow, it sure is good to see Registerfly just toeing the line there.

    I wonder what ICANN will do next? Send an angry email?

    -- thanks, Dave

  32. Re:NamesDirect by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    You must have either a short memory or you missed out on all the fun. NamesDirect suffered a massive meltdown of its DNS servers a few years back, leaving hundreds of thousands of domains in the dark for a week or more

    I guess I did miss out! I've never used their DNS, opting to use the servers my employer uses.

    That's a most unfortunate event but I hope Namesdirect has learned their lesson, and that others have learned from it too. Technology can fail, but the failure to address an issue with one's customer is inexcusable.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  33. Registerfly hacked! by mannishboy · · Score: 1
    I just logged into my Registerfly account and saw a popup with this text:

    Yes Indeed, RegisterFly's Security HAS been breached, we are helping RegisterFly's VICTIMS to Regain control of THEIR Legally Owned domain names. KEVIN MEDINA! Dont try anything stupid, we have VERY sensitive DATA about you, and we are ready to publish it anytime soon, blackmail may be your first thought, but it is victory for your victims. With all our love, The Registerfly's Hackers.
    Not sure of the implications of this. We'll have to see if anything comes of it. As one of the "victims", if this is supposed to make me happy, it doesn't, it's just one more thing to worry about in this whole debacle.