Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Foundation Sues Microsoft Over Tabbed Browsing

SlashRating© 64 slashdottit! tm According to the german tech-site heise.de, the Mozilla Foundation is suing Microsoft over the use of tabbed browsing in Internet Explorer 7. The Mozilla Foundation owns the patent 5,160,296 through one of their developers (Solomon Katz, a former Opera dev) and has begun suing Microsoft in Mountainview, California. The Foundation wants that MS immediately ceases to distribute IE 7 and pays 1.4 Billion dollars in damages. Heise reports that Microsoft has issued no official response, but is contemplating to ship IE 7 NT (no tabs).

149 comments

  1. It is already April 1st in Germany by doug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you've fallen for a hoax.

    1. Re:It is already April 1st in Germany by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      Second that, it's a joke.


      Falls sich Mozilla vor Gericht durchsetzt, sei die Herausgabe eines Internet Explorer NT denkbar. "NT" für "non tabbed"

      Yeah sure...

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    2. Re:It is already April 1st in Germany by Alphager · · Score: 3, Informative

      damnit, i hoped i could get it onto the frontpage.
      you have ruined the joke! ;-)

    3. Re:It is already April 1st in Germany by karearea · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahh the joys of global communication ... in another 2 hours 40 minutes it will be the 2nd of April ... at least in the land of the long white cloud ... others will catch up in due course :-)

    4. Re:It is already April 1st in Germany by name*censored* · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ah, but is living in the future REALLY worth the burden of having to live in New Zealand?

      (ps. it's a joke)
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  2. SlashRating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't work! I try to Slashdottit and it has no effect. I'm calling shenanigans!

    1. Re:SlashRating by kfonda · · Score: 1

      Darnit, I just put my broom away, now I gotta go and get it back out of the closet.

    2. Re:SlashRating by intercodes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I found out something. Try coding in large values in the URL string..

      http://slashdot.org/slashdottit.shtml?vote="BIG NUMBER HERE"

      It's interesting.

      Did I succeed :)?

      --
      The best result comes from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself and for the group
    3. Re:SlashRating by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      414 Request URI too long

  3. Mod me insightful for no real reason by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Troll

    Come on. Come oooooon

    1. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by jibjibjib · · Score: 1, Troll

      Dude, that only works the first time.

    2. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apparently not.

    3. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by bcmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MEEEE TOOO! PLEASE.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by Clazzy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ok then.

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    5. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny is the "metamoderation" doesn't know about April 1 and moderators will be punished to hell when this comment shows up in metamoderation 4 days later or something :)

    6. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, your llama is full of RAM. And she's going to be really surprised when the crias are born. (Or would they be lambs? Maybe lias? Maybe crambs?)

    7. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by sarcasticfrench · · Score: 1

      Crias is correct. However, with the advent of TiSP and google's quest to take over the world, I am afraid we will now have to call the gCrias.

      --
      This is not a sig. This is a llama-duck. Quack.
    8. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not so suare: the child of a male donkey and a female horse is a mule. A female donkey and a male horse make a hinney.

      What do you call the result of a llama that's been stuffed with RAM? Maybe we need a new word: for a woolly-thinking creature that has lots of memory that can't be accessed, we could call it a reagan?

    9. Re:Mod me insightful for no real reason by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Uh, you do see the dates when you meta-moderate, you know.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
  4. Ponies!! Ponies!! by eclectro · · Score: 4, Informative

    I want to see some ponies! pink ones! slashdot is lame.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by RedElf · · Score: 1

      Cue the new posting standards adopted from digg:

      Your IQ must be below 5 to proceed posting.

      --
      You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
    2. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cue new headline "Digg sues Slashdot over patented posting method. Low submitter IQ 'cornerstone of Diggs's success'"

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG Ponies! LOL!

    4. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Cue the new posting standards adopted from digg:

      Your IQ must be below 5 to proceed posting. Don't call people names or you will go down to -40 troll!
    5. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by Lars+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

      I want to see some ponies! pink ones! slashdot is lame. You must not be that new here.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by Sique · · Score: 1

      Here we go:

      Ponies at Sinfest

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:Ponies!! Ponies!! by endianx · · Score: 1

      Could someone please explain omgponies to me? Google and wikipedia have failed me.

  5. Mozilla (firefox tabs) vs MSFT (Office 12 ribbon) by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to have an impact on their Office 12 ribbon tab patents isnt it?

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
  6. Patent office on crack by MaelstromX · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ok, April fool's joke aside, what the heck is up with that patent that it is linked to?

    Abstract: This directory tab would aid in organizing and tracking files in a suspended filing system. The quick reference directory saves the user time and provides a handy at-a-glance feature to a filing system. This directory tab is designed to eliminate sorting through a suspended folder; it allows the user to look at the directory and visually see what's in a folder. Its design also permits additions or deletions in a quick and efficient manner. The directory tab is designed to allow office personnel who are in need of a particular item within a suspended file folder the ability to date and initial the directory tab. In doing so, the next user that comes along needing the same information will be able to identify who has it in a quick and efficient manner.


    Good grief, they'll let you patent ANYTHING won't they?
    1. Re:Patent office on crack by supersat · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they will. I went to Google Patents to look at the images from the referenced patent, and on the front page, I saw a patent for... wait for it...

      A jumping snail.

      Okay, yeah, it's a design patent, but still...

    2. Re:Patent office on crack by ultracool · · Score: 1

      The Wheel [pdf warning]

    3. Re:Patent office on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least there they admit that they don't review the applications (prior to litigation anyway).

    4. Re:Patent office on crack by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Everyday is April 1st at the Patent Office. Sadly though, they aren't playing jokes...they are the joke.

    5. Re:Patent office on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For God's fucking sake you mother fucking Slashdot imbeciles ... READ THE MOTHER FUCKING CLAIMS, NOT THE ABSTRACT! You make me sick! Can you really BE this fucking stupid???

    6. Re:Patent office on crack by Jorgandar · · Score: 0

      I think you're just jealous becuase you didnt think of it first and patent the quick and easy suspended reference directory..uh..folder..uh filing date and initial thinggy. what does it do?

    7. Re:Patent office on crack by mpe · · Score: 1

      Everyday is April 1st at the Patent Office. Sadly though, they aren't playing jokes...they are the joke.

      No doubt they hold an "evergreen" patent on April Fools Day as well as one on bad jokes.

  7. Re:Mozilla (firefox tabs) vs MSFT (Office 12 ribbo by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

    Damm you, fooled again. Im going to play games all day as surfing online is just going to be "impractical" today for the next 24 timezones. Just when you think its over, bam another site in antoher timezone pulls a prank. ZE PAIN I CANT TAKE ANYMORE:

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
  8. So, remember folks by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want to be corporately evil without the hoards of geekdom realising it, be evil on April the first.

    Today is the day when Microsoft could start a hostile takeover of every linux company, and Google could announcetheir new policy of "Hang it, we'll start worshipping satan", without anyone being the wiser.

    1. Re:So, remember folks by epo001 · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, I thought every day was a day "without anyone being the wiser."

      TGI April 2nd.

  9. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Don't jump the gun quite yet. It behooves us to see how Mozilla handles filing this claim, suspending judgement until we see whether it's in order or not. I know this might leave you hanging, but it's wiser just to keep tabs (Preferably new, improved non-porous plastic ones) on this affair.

  10. Good day by SolitaryMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always thought April 1st is the best day for suing someone :)

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
    1. Re:Good day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's certainly not a good day to be reading news. Damnit, I hate this day. Everybody with serious news holds it back until the stupid jokes are gone, which makes the SNR even worse. I'll turn off my computer and cellphone now and take a long walk. Then I'll watch movies until this unfunny heap of bullshit day is over. ... No, I'm not! APRIL FOOLS! HA! HA! *groan*

    2. Re:Good day by Moflamby-2042 · · Score: 1

      It's also the best day to invade unsuspecting countries. Who'd believe it until April 2nd!

    3. Re:Good day by mpe · · Score: 1

      It's also the best day to invade unsuspecting countries. Who'd believe it until April 2nd!

      Actually it is a fairly common day for governments to bring out unpopular legislation...

  11. Opera by denver38 · · Score: 1

    Opera started even years before Firefox with tabbed browsing....

    1. Re:Opera by nocomment · · Score: 1

      and apple before that with at-ease (and someone else probably before that).

      I suspect this is an omgponies moment.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Opera by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >>Opera started even years before Firefox with tabbed browsing....
      --
      RTFA Katz worked at Opera and owns the patent. Now he works for Mozilla and Opera has a licence.

    3. Re:Opera by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Tabs were introduced in Microsoft Office 97

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:Opera by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're making a serious, meaningful comment on hoax news on April 1st.

      C'mon, get into the spirit of the day and lower your IQ by 100. At least. Do like I did and soak your brain in alcohol. It really does the job well.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 11 types of people in the world, those that know binary and those that don't.


      Did I miss something? Is that a new spin on the "There are 10 types of people in the world, those that know binary and those that don't."?
    6. Re:Opera by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Did I miss something? Is that a new spin on the "There are 10 types of people in the world, those that know binary and those that don't."? Yes. It's a spin that recognizes the concept of zero.
  12. OK! by Centurix · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew keeping my Netscape shares would pay off one day!

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:OK! by RedElf · · Score: 1

      You must use I.E., you will use I.E., there is nothing but I.E..

      --
      You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
  13. Attention Windows Clickarounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah i'm talking to you. The wannabe computer programmer who thinks they are good at computers because they can click around the computer enough times and find the reboot button and 'fix' an inherently flawed windows system. You think you're cool because you can pirate photoshop but not know anything about it, get Microsoft Office for free but have the literacy of a 1st grader when writing a paper, and get a copy of Norton Anti-virus because your inherently flawed system is useless without Administrative privileges. Get a clue, you are not smart, you are just a corporate sheep for a company that will bury you if you ever tried to write any software that did anything remotely useful. You are a clickaround and all you know if your ugly gray existence that is Windows.

    Want the sourcecode to windows vista?

    head -n 1000000 /dev/random > Windows.com

    1. Re:Attention Windows Clickarounds by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      Crikey I didn't realise Che Guevara was working in open source now. Bill must be quaking in his boots.

    2. Re:Attention Windows Clickarounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are a clickaround and all you know if your ugly gray existence that is Windows.

      Like most ACs on here (except me)you truly need to get laid.

    3. Re:Attention Windows Clickarounds by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Crikey I didn't realise Che Guevara was working in open source now. Bill must be quaking in his boots. No, he's just working there on the side. His full time job is in the cool t-shirt business.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    4. Re:Attention Windows Clickarounds by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is I never even thought that. I just thought - "head -n 1000000 /dev/random > Windows.com"? - what a horrible waste of entropy...

  14. No hoax foax by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's no hoax folks.
    April Fools' day was moved to April 2nd when the United States adjusted Daylight Savings Time this year.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:No hoax foax by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Best comment so far, Cheers :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:No hoax foax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought EVERY day in the USA was fools day what with Bush being President.

    3. Re:No hoax foax by SPQR_Julian · · Score: 1

      See this, this was actually funny! I miss the ponies and the pink. Best April Fools ever.

  15. Re:Mozilla (firefox tabs) vs MSFT (Office 12 ribbo by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    dunno, apple had ribbons in system 8 or even earlier maybe. And "tabbable" windows (windows dragged down would become tabs) which wasn't a bad idea in days where screen real estate was precious.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  16. Self-referential post attempt by SamSim · · Score: 2, Informative

    This post is modded +5, Informative!

    1. Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Self-referential post attempt by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This post is modded +5, Informative!"

      Now for a challenge:
      This post is modded +5 Redundant

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Self-referential post attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post is modded +4, Informative.

    3. Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Self-referential post attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now for a challenge: This post is modded +5 Redundant
      If only this post and this post were self referencing...
  17. Opera ? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I discovered tabbed browsing with Opera. Was Mozilla really the first to implement it?

    --
    McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    1. Re:Opera ? by dsoltesz · · Score: 1

      Opera had it long before any other browser, so I had my hackles up when this popped up in the RSS feed. Discovering that it's all a lame-ass April Fool's hoax just disappointed me to the point I'm considering turning off all my computers for the next 21 hours and reading a book or something so I don't have to look at the fscking Internet. The damned hoaxes started yesterday, and I reached my threshold for pain around 19:47 last night.

    2. Re:Opera ? by Delkster · · Score: 1

      No, but that doesn't seem to bear much practical significance with regard to who is actually granted a patent.

      Of course that may well have an effect in a possible lawsuit regarding the patent, but in this case there really is no lawsuit, so...

    3. Re:Opera ? by intercodes · · Score: 1

      These sound silly for some of us, but there are lot of people out there who actually believe these kind of crap.

      Several friends were pinging me today with "OMG ..free broadband" .. and "Google Roxor"....
      http://www.google.com/tisp/

      --
      The best result comes from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself and for the group
    4. Re:Opera ? by unapersson · · Score: 1

      "Opera had it long before any other browser, so I had my hackles up when this popped up in the RSS feed."

      No it didn't, Netcaptor did. And if you search google groups you'll see people asking for tabbed browsing in Mozilla like in Netcaptor. Not Opera. Opera didn't have true tabbed browsing until after a few others had implemented it (Skipstone, Galeon, Mozilla). For a start, at which point in Opera could you have multiple windows with multiple tabs in them, rather than the fairly typical MDI interface they had?

    5. Re:Opera ? by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I may be remembering wrong, but if I recall correctly Opera 5 was the first version to allow you to have both multiple windows and multiple "tabs" (which were of course really MDI child windows) at the same time. Opera 4 allowed you to choose either an MDI or an SDI interface. Opera 3 and earlier were MDI-only.

      Of course, more recent versions introduced the ability to turn off the MDI altogether and have "real" tabs. I think I'm one of the few remaining stop-outs using an Opera 3-style MDI interface with the "tabs" and address bar at the bottom above the status bar.

    6. Re:Opera ? by MadJo · · Score: 1
      RTFS (Read the fine summary):

      The Mozilla Foundation owns the patent 5,160,296 through one of their developers (Solomon Katz, a former Opera dev)
      btw, did you look at today's date? :)
    7. Re:Opera ? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1
      btw, did you look at today's date? :)


      yes I did, and the tags too

      but I like hoaxes to be realistic

      Otherwise, okay, I missed this part of the summary! I didn't know that patents would follow the inventor when he switches companies
      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    8. Re:Opera ? by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      Are you actually trying to post insightful messages on April 1st? What's wrong with you?

      In all seriousness, I loved NetCaptor back in the day. Tabbed browsing was ahead of it's time, and just as useful then as it is now.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    9. Re:Opera ? by MadJo · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that patents would follow the inventor when he switches companies
      Well, I wasn't sure either, but the patent is on the name of that person, and not on the name of Opera. So I'd guess that it would follow him at least. :)
    10. Re:Opera ? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You need some different friends. Maybe somebody not associated with slashdot. I hear there is this neat new website, Mispaced, or something like that. Very friendly folks.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Opera ? by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      I think Opera 6 introduced multi instance MDI. Why people call this TRUE tabs is beyond me. Anyway, you can get multi instance with previous versions of Opera by opening in a hex editor and changing one Byte. Search for "Opera Create" and change the 'O' to a unique name for each instance. You also have to have different install directories and ensure the opera.ini points to separate install folders, otherwise you have conflicts.

      Making a program multi instance is simply that arbitrary, a check box in a wizard, and it's ridiculous that people attack Opera for not being a TRUE tabbed browser over such idiotic things as this.

  18. I know it's an April Fools Joke But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we could get someone to fuck-up and release the source code to IE 7?

  19. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

    Yes, especially as its April 1st, and there is no mention of it on Mozilla's website. I doubt Mozilla would be so stupid anyway. The problem with patents is the sheer MAD ness. We could no doubt discover that some reviewer at the patent office has rubber-stamped MS's request for a patent on base 2 or something like that.

  20. MOD PARENT UP by uncommonlygood · · Score: 1

    Couldn't agree more

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but apparently they're into flaming.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  21. gives it away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stupid tagging gives it away...

    [+] omgponies, aprilfools, court, microsoft, mozilla (tagging beta)

  22. Patent is for physical files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the patent - it is about physical files and not computer files! Nice twist to the joke.

    See abstract and drawings on Google patents

    Andy

  23. Re:Mozilla (firefox tabs) vs MSFT (Office 12 ribbo by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

    Doesnt stop the patent office granting them :) http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7028023.html Linked lists have been around for decades and now its only patented in 2006. I suggest everybody flood the patent office with prior art patents, You will be supprised how many get granted, then you have right to claim money and while you hold that money (dont spend it), earn interest on it then when the patent is revoked, you simply pay the money back :) But youve made moeny. Everybody should flood the system until breaking point by doing it. They are, so why dont you do it too. In effect, slashdot it.

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
  24. Wow... Firefox really has gone mainstream by Kelson · · Score: 1

    They're even filing patent lawsuits now! And I thought this post that Firefox was no longer alternative enough to be an "alternative browser" was taking things too far.

  25. wikipedia says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the founders of Opera built an MDI-based browser in the same year (via a technical preview not available publicly; a public release was made in 1996). The tabbed interface approach was then followed by the Internet Explorer shell NetCaptor in 1997. These were followed by a number of others like IBrowse in 1999, Opera in 2000 (with the release of version 4), Mozilla in 2001 (through the MultiZilla extension in April of 2001 and a built-in tabbed browsing mode added to Mozilla 0.9.5 in October of 2001), Konqueror 3.1 in January 2003, and Safari in 2003. As of 2006, most graphical web browsers support a tabbed interface, including Internet Explorer 7. Software, such as the freeware AM Browser, is also available to add a TDI around earlier versions of Internet Explorer. OmniWeb version 5, released August 2004, includes visual tabbed browsing which displays preview images of pages in a drawer to the left or right of the main browser window. Avant Browser, Maxthon and Slim Browser are some of the most popular tabbed browsers using Internet Explorer's rendering engine."

    so... either this is a joke or we have prior art to that patent.

  26. wtf??? by sharperguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    wtf???

    I own the patents to jokes like this!!!

    /me goes off to sue /.

    :P

    --
    "sudo rm -rf your-face"
    1. Re:wtf??? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Quick! People, quick! Here he is! The first one to make really lame ass jokes! He invented them! He started the avalanche! Slashdot him! Slashdot him!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. NO! by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    Please, I beg of you, man, don't give them any more Bad Ideas! I don't want to have to convert from hexidecimal to "Microsoft .NET Visual Base DOS" to decimal in order to figure out a BSOD!

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:No! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      haha...MuhahaH....MwuhahahahahA....haha...hehe...h e...heh...um....cough.

  28. Best Battlecry... by TigerPaw · · Score: 0

    Mozilla to Microsoft:
    "It's clobberin time!"

    Microsoft to Mozilla:
    "Come get some!"

  29. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check today's date...

  30. well... by thaddeusthudpucker · · Score: 1

    I say YAY!!! for mozilla is this is true, and they win (which I seriously hope they do, maybe M$ will stop coming out with crappy new OSes like vista...) But if this is an April fool's article, Clever! I about leaped up and did cartwheels...

  31. Mod me up dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward needs more karma. NOW!!

    Vote with your mod points and your dollars.

  32. Oh... my... gawd... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    The schaedenfreud from a move like this would be most deserved on the Monopoly, but of course, noting the date, one can't help but laugh and wish it were true. Good story.

  33. Thank God Its Sunday by davmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad April 1st is on Sunday this year. That way we don't have to worry about real news getting ignored and overlooked because Slashdot editors are too busy thinking up an entire day of bullshit stories.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Thank God Its Sunday by fbjon · · Score: 1

      ACtually, they haven't thought up a single one yet. Only reported on other stories, just like normal.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  34. No! by turing_m · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mozilla should hold out for...

    One hundred billion dollars!!!

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  35. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by makomk · · Score: 1

    Heh - obviously the moderators didn't bother to RTFPatent...

  36. In other news by kbox · · Score: 1

    .. opera sues mozilla. (btw, i do know its an april fools)

  37. heh, good one,.. by tachyonflow · · Score: 1

    This had me fooled for a minute. I was screaming "Noooooooo! Mozilla, you're playing with fire!" After all, if Mozilla really had such a patent, they'd do well to save it for defensive purposes.

    I haven't hit the sack yet, so it didn't quite sink in that it was April Fool's Day. In fact, with all the all-nighters I've been pulling lately, I think my biological clock is only up to about March 20 or so.

  38. This one is the best so far by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    :-) and cat did not get my tongue.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  39. If this is real, then the wars have begun. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Great. Make the lawyer's rich. This is like a little British boat moving close to Iranian waters. Really.

    It's the excuse Microsoft needs to start their barrage of litigation. They have lawyers. They have money. Guess who doesn't?

    Ballmer's been waiting for this moment, and The Mozilla Foundation handed it to him on a platter. Wanna see what happens when it's not really David vs. Goliath, rather Genghis Khan vs your neighbors? Watch.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  40. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bah. Nobody appreciates (or even notices) subtle puns any longer. Or reads the article(s) cited, for the matter.

    Perhaps I was a little too subtle. Next time, it's strictly "OMFG PONIES!" That way, if anyone rates that "overrated", Taco will come down from on high and turn their css all pink.

  41. John Katz got a patent... by dattaway · · Score: 1

    Heeee's baaaack!

  42. No-TRUE-Scotsman fallacy. by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

    "Opera had it long before any other browser..."

    "No it didn't, Netcaptor did. Not Opera. Opera didn't have true tabbed browsing until after a few others had implemented it (Skipstone, Galeon, Mozilla)."
    Well, if you're going to split hairs to load the dice, Netcaptor was not a browser, it was a shell. I remember Opera 3 had what I, and most people would call tabbed browsing, but you're trying to be a jackass.
    1. Re:No-TRUE-Scotsman fallacy. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      When did Opera 3 come out. I know that Lotus Notes had it with version 4 in 1996. If I wanted to split hairs, they had it in 1993, but the pages were not served via http over TCP/IP, so I will call it 1996. Thanks for that link by the way.

    2. Re:No-TRUE-Scotsman fallacy. by unapersson · · Score: 1

      "Well, if you're going to split hairs to load the dice, Netcaptor was not a browser, it was a shell. I remember Opera 3 had what I, and most people would call tabbed browsing, but you're trying to be a jackass."

      I'm not actually, I'm being completely serious (yes despite it being the first). I'm just recovering from a nasty bug and don't feel all that silly. And yes, I'm aware Netcaptor was a shell, but it was also the inspiration for a lot of the Mozilla based tabbed browsing efforts. The earliest I can remember being Skipstone in 2000.

      I used Opera 3 and used to like the raised display they used for hyperlinks (instead of underlines). The way you could easily link one window to another so that links from one window would open in a specified child window. Setting up real parent-child relationships.

      Yet despite that familiarity, tabbed browsing still felt like something new when I used it. The so called tabbed browsing in Opera was never referred to as such, and was never promoted as a feature, it was simply recognised as standard MDI. You could have all the pages as tiny little windows overlapping one another, that's hardly a tabbed interface. It's only people after the fact that are trying desperately to promote it as an Opera invention. I have no idea why.

    3. Re:No-TRUE-Scotsman fallacy. by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      Oh, I just installed Opera 3 and I don't see tabs. Opera 4 has them.

      Call them what you like. If you have windows, overlapping, and you can switch between them, with tiny titled labels, then you're talking about TABS. Microsoft invented tabs in Windows 95. It's called the Task Bar. Along with all the property windows. Oh, but I guess they didn't invent bookmarks, because they called them favorites. Shoot.

      MDI is not the antithesis of Tabs. Just because you don't call something tabs, or promote as such, does not mean your browser is not tabbed.

      Nevertheless, based on a quick install, it does look like Opera 3 doesn't have Tabs, but you [Ctrl] + [Tab] the windows. I must have confused v4 with v3. But you're still making bad arguments:

      "Opera wasn't the first browser with tabs.. I mean TRUE tabs... It was just MDI.. I mean, they didn't seem like tabs to me, and no one called them tabs, or promoted as such.

      Mistakes: Opera was a browser with tabs in v4. MDI can have tabs. They don't need to be called or promoted as tabs to be tabs. TRUE tabs is loading the dice. You should really never argue with someone who says TRUE ANYTHING, as it'll probably go nowhere.

  43. As these stories are just bs... by xtracto · · Score: 0, Troll

    I want some karma too...

    But I have to answer to the current poll.

    Missing Option:
    Boobs. [No need to speak spanish]... might not be too safe for work.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  44. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's a lot of money to give or lose

  45. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1

    Ummm... it's April 1, dude.

  46. HAHAHAHA by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    great! You might as well sue Dillotoo ya bastards!

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  47. Enough already... by AlphaLop · · Score: 1

    I understand that it is a /. tradition to have lots of April Fools stories on the first, but does the whole page have to be composed of these this year? I am not trying to be flame bait I am just saying once is funny, 4 is wearing thin and this many is just plain tired..

    --
    It's only paranoia if your wrong...
    1. Re:Enough already... by openldev · · Score: 1

      The stories aren't funny. What's funny is how many people are posting comments thinking that they are real ...

  48. Foolishness to start a patent war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK Microsoft has been patenting all manner of obvious things but has been keeping these for defensive purposes. It is wonderful to have patents in hand that they are vulnerable to, but foolishness to start a patent war with them given that by now they have the software equivalent of many patents for the wheel, the lever, and Lord knows what else thanks to the stupidity of USPTO. Better to let them know that a patent exists but NOT sue them, so the next time Mr. Ballmer rants about open source software using Microsoft IP (i.e., these patents on the obvious) he can be reminded that there are some places Microsoft violates patents also. The danger is that Microsoft may buy off this one, then go on to start filing its own lawsuits all over the place since they have been so publically sued. It is not a war that is wise to start, will make nobody rich but the lawyers and impoverish everyone else...unless (bloody unlikely!) Congress should step in and reform the patent system.

  49. Will they sue Knoqueror (KDE) abd Safari(Aplle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Konqueror (KDE) and Safari (Apple) have tabs. Will Mozilla also sue KDE and Apple? Or they only go for The Big Green (over one billion from Microsoft)?. I dont know about KDE, but Apple can also be squeezed for a big sum (not as much modey as from Microsoft but still worth the effort)

  50. Somebody sue Slashdot by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    Because the new Slashdot design does not render properly in Firefox.

    What asshat designer would not make sure that a site like frigging SLASHDOT! doesn't work in frigging FIREFOX!

    Jeez, I hate IE!

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:Somebody sue Slashdot by cyrtainne · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this is a joke. Slashdot works PERFECTLY in Firefox.

    2. Re:Somebody sue Slashdot by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot works PERFECTLY in Firefox."

      Oh, really? Then explain this. http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u204/DZaidle/?a ction=view&current=Slashdoterror.jpg

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  51. Re:Boo Mozilla!!! by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

    "April Fools"

    You ruined it for all of the people who just read the title of the article.

    (spoiler warning)
    The patents supporting images are of paper file folders with tabs sticking up from the top.

    --
    If you must!
  52. tabs by jovius · · Score: 1

    i can imagine the tabs being damaging... they are competing about the global tab share. you see, when a microsoft user brings about 10 tabs, it raises the total number of tabs in the world, and is 10 tabs less for other browsers. the ratio of tabs is relative to a sum of money the software companies get paid by the government for being efficient and space saving. what you all should do now is to open 100 tabs in your firefoxes, or more preferably in your local bar, so we cab really take this issue on to the next level.

  53. Another BAD Patent by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1

    Using tabs for separate windows in an app pre-dates FF's use of them. Using them in a browser is hardly innovative. Sounds to me like the Mozilla patent is just another BAD patent.

    1. Re:Another BAD Patent by Elf_h34d3r · · Score: 1

      It's okay. Apparently today Wizards of the Coast announced that they are suing SquareEnix over FF's use of tabs in games as well. WotC argues that when they bought TSR, they acquired the rights to different sections (referred to as "tabs" internally) for different parts of the DND character sheet.

      Avid players of FF will note that since FF1, the UI for the character information has also divided the data into sections that they refer to as "tabs" internally as well. SquareEnix has been infringing on their patent since 1987.

      I'm glad someone's finally taking a stand against SquareEnix!

  54. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is the fuckwad that moderated this flambe?

  55. Get the story correct by slugstone · · Score: 1

    Opera had tab browings first.

  56. Mozilla Foundation Sues Microsoft by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

    well, it looks like opera-mozilla finally got the drop on bill and steve. that patent app is airtight, believe me. fair and square. crazy, but redmond is just going to have to bite the bullet and start calling them something else, at least here in the states. maybe they could try "knobs." no wait, i know: "babs!" yep. that could work. in other oddness i heard that hex thing on saturn is really a giant nut holding the planet together - and it's loosening! why is april so damn weird? - js.

  57. Funnily, IBM actually owns the patent to tabbed br by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1
  58. And In Other News by coyote4til7 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And in other news readers notice that (once again) every Slashdot posting on 4/1 is an April Fool's joke. Since April Fool's jokes arn't funny when you see them coming, no one is fooled. Commander Taco continues to laugh.

    --

    the clock on the wall says 4 til 7
  59. Shame ... by i_wanna_be_a_scienti · · Score: 1

    Now, if only this didn't have to go through a lawsuit ... and microsoft would just give them the money ... for free ... not on april fools ... because they felt like it ... but, what are the chances of that ever happening? i probably should disconnect my internet for the next 11 hours ... i was asleep before so it didn't matter ... but now ...

  60. Microsoft Performs Illegal Operation, Shuts Down by DECS · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Performs Illegal Operation, Shuts Down

    Microsoft Corp. issued a surprise press release this morning announcing that the company had "performed an illegal operation and would be shut down." Company executives refused to provide further information regarding the cause of the unexpected shutdown, only issuing a cryptic error number of $00038FF577 and advising all interested parties to "contact their system administrator."

  61. Another alternative... by catbutt · · Score: 1

    you could, say, go outside. Toss a frisbee. Walk the dog. Strike up a conversation with a real world human being.

    Seriously, you can survive one full day without regular Slashdot. You can.

    1. Re:Another alternative... by AlphaLop · · Score: 1
      Nuh uh.... ;)

      I don't like the big room with the blue ceiling and the bright light. It's scary there.... I will just sit here and bask in the glow of my CRT and wait it out.

      --
      It's only paranoia if your wrong...
  62. hmm... by quakehead3 · · Score: 0

    Tabbed browsing considered harmful.

  63. Hanging File Folders by mastakuno · · Score: 1

    If you look at the drawing for the patent, you'll see a hanging file folder with a tab in it. Where can I get that firefox theme and can I get it in standard green?

  64. The real fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amazing thing is, given how desperate and jealous the FOSS FUD-driven industry has become, this actually SEEMS like something they would sue for.

    They seem desperate to make money, since they are giving away a free product... which STILL can't compete with anything Microsoft makes. Not because it's "bundled", as they would have you believe, but rather because Microsoft, as always, ends up making vastly superior products than their competitors.

    Netscape didn't lose the first time because IE3.01 was included on the Win95 OSR2 cd (but not installed), they lost because Netscape was a buggy, crash-prone piece of shi.... garbage. And as a REAL kick in the teeth to the consumer, it was a buggy, crash-prone piece of shi.... garbage they had the honor of paying $50 for... in addition to the $50 they paid for the third-party WinSock (and maybe another $50 for a TCP/IP protocol stack).

    Microsoft was the FIRST and ONLY company which said that EVERY consumer using their OS had the RIGHT to have all this stuff included... which the anti-MS FUD agenda is STILL fighting. Like it's some kind of virtue to pay $150 for a browser.

    The REAL issue here is that these companies can't compete with Microsoft on the basis of how good their products are, so they are trying to legislate Microsoft into being forced into putting out a weaker product with fewer features so these companies will actually have a chance to con consumers into purchasing buggy, poorly written, non-MS software.

    So this may or not be true, but it's certainly plausible. Sadly.

  65. TAB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla Foundation Sues Microsoft Over Tabbed Browsing
    That's okay, they can keep it. I prefer Coked browsing, anyway.
  66. Tab patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Adobe really does own the patent on tabs (early 1990's) in rich clients. Adobe used in in an organizer product and vigorously enforced it at the time. I wonder if their corp[orate memory is so short they have forgotten about it?

  67. Re:Mozilla (firefox tabs) vs MSFT (Office 12 ribbo by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    This outlines a course of action I am critical of because i think too much money would be involved in litigation and you can't fight the money makers with money. But this is only my gut feeling and this idea deserves more recognition than a post deep in slashdot discussion theme. You might contact some anti-patents movement and submit it as an idea.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  68. Since When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since When did Mozilla ORG own the rights to tabbed browsing? Opera came up with tabbed browsing way before Mozilla (as a web browser) ever existed!