Slashdot Mirror


Large Caves Found on the Surface of Mars

David DelMonte writes "Space.com is reporting on the discovery of seven dark spots near the Equator on Mars. The thinking is that these are cave openings. The openings are the size of football fields, and one of them is thought to extend approximately 400 feet below the surface.'The researchers hope the discovery will lead to more focused spelunking on Mars. "Caves on Mars could become habitats for future explorers or could be the only structures that preserve evidence of past or present microbial life ," said Glenn Cushing of Northern Arizona University, who first spotted the black areas in the photographs.'"

191 comments

  1. We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The fact planets orbit other stars, the fact there's water elsewhere in the solar system, the fact there are caves on other planets...Why do we as humans believe we are unique in a universe as big as what we live in? This should be common sense by now.

    1. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by beckerist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point of the story is more about the fact this discovery might lead to much easier access to sub-martian exploration. Caves are a natural occurance everywhere, that's not debated. The fact we found some on Mars that have the potential to open up new discoveries for us mere "humans" is why this story is relevant.

    2. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by jizziknight · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Why do we as humans believe we are unique in a universe as big as what we live in? The same reason we thought that Earth was the center of the universe, that the sun revolved around Earth, that the earth was flat, etc. A person is smart. People are ignorant. Religion is also somewhat to blame.
      --
      Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
    3. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oblig Futurama quote
      Brannigan: "The great stone face of mars, the only enterance to the martian underground"
      Bender: "What about the great stone ass of mars"
      Brannigan: "Yea, but thats all the way on the other side of the planet"

    4. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't confuse a propaganda campaign by NASA with what scientists actually think. Nobody working in the field is the least surprised by caves on Mars. But NASA need to make press releases and hype them up a bit. And anyway, caves on Mars are cool.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try running something on a $1.75 a year...err $1.50 now and then get back to me on trying to muster up hype to be able to afford another slice of pizza.

    6. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There was an interesting article in SciAm awhile back about parallel universes - it was postulated that if the universe was truly infinite then an exact replica of you existed somewhere in the neighborhood of 10^100 light years away, because that's how much volume of space would be required to store all possible combinations/arrangements of matter that exist in the known/visible universe - at about 10^100 light years you'd have a duplicate arrangement.

      Of course, this also implies that if you consider the set of all possible arrangements of matter that we live in the one where humanity exists alone in the visible universe. So, since:

      a) mathematically it's possible humanity is alone in this universe, and
      b) we have seen no evidence of extraterrestrial life,

      does it surprise ANYONE why most people think we're alone in the universe?

      And I didn't even feel the need to pick on religion to explain it.

    7. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by profplump · · Score: 3, Interesting

      we thought that Earth was the center of the universe, that the sun revolved around Earth

      I really wish people would stop telling these lies. The Earth *is* the center of the universe, and the sun *does* revolve around the Earth. If you're talking about other planets or galaxies it's not necessary a handy reference point, but there's no technical reason that you can't define Earth as the origin in any coordinate system. Similarly it's just as accurate to say that the sun revolves around Earth as it is to say that Earth revolves around the sun; the sun and Earth revolve around each other, and anything more specific only expresses a frame a reference, not a technical truth.

      The only part people ever got wrong was the the movement of other planets; there were models that showed other planets in revolution around Earth, and those were inaccurate (and quickly discovered to be so as soon as the technology existed to measure the inaccuracies in the predicted orbits of the planets). But in a time before access to high-quality optics it's not entirely unreasonable to suppose that distant non-star objects you observe behave in the same way as the sun and the moon -- that they also revolve around the Earth.

      I won't argue the "earth was flat" point (much) for the moment, as there were at least some people at some point in history who believed that. Not many people who actually studied the subject, at least not since some year that ended with "BC", but there were some people in the Early Middle Ages who argued for a flat-earth model, and their belief was wrong, so it's a better point than the first two, even if it's based on a misunderstanding of history.

      And while religion does may bad (fight about stupid things) and good things (organize society in the absence of stable political powers), they can't be blamed for your misunderstanding of astronomy or history, so maybe you should lay off.

    8. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by beckerist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the scale of it all is lost on us. We're very very limited in our perceptions of reality, as we are confined to our 5 senses, and making appropriations and rough abstractions so that we can understand this reality as it relates to us. Just because we haven't seen evidence of extra-terrestrials, is not proof that they aren't there. Also, just because something is mathematically possible is a very far stretch from being a mathematical improbability (which this most certainly isn't.) You make valid points as to the psychology behind why people believe we are alone. I'm just saying that logically, if you look past the hubris and near-sightedness of our race we are most likely not alone.

    9. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by CowboyJezus · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Don't feed the bears!" Same thing goes for ACs. Don't reply to their crappy posts and they'll eventually be less of an issue. Speaking of issues, could you imagine living in some Martian cave? Creepy!

    10. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The fact planets orbit other stars, the fact there's water elsewhere in the solar system, the fact there are caves on other planets...Why do we as humans believe we are unique in a universe as big as what we live in? This should be common sense by now.

      Yes! The sheer gall and hubris of the article writer! Instead of the original headline, it should read: Earth has caves just like Mars does.

    11. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by jabberw0k · · Score: 2, Funny

      I define myself as the Origin of the Universe.

      You may think you exist, but actually you only flicker into reality during the brief periods that I perceive you.

      Not that I'm an egotist or anything.

    12. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Don't feed the bears!" Same thing goes for ACs. Don't reply to their crappy posts and they'll eventually be less of an issue.

      The first sign says "Do not feed the trolls, lest they multiply."

      The second sign says "Do not feed those who feed the trolls, comment moderation works."

      The third sign consists of seven angels with seven golden bowls filled with the wrath of God, but Revelations 15 has nothing to do with this.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by RMingin · · Score: 1

      You think you're special, but you're only a figment of my imagination. As for self as origin point of measurement: Duh. We've all been doing that since roughly birth. Where is the telephone? Two feet TO THE LEFT OF ME. Where is the beer? It's about twenty feet FROM ME. Everybody thinks they're the first to discover masturbation, and everyone on /. thinks they're the first to discover egotism or sociopathy.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    14. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by CowboyJezus · · Score: 0

      Lesson learned. Damn I'm addicted to slashdot. I actually care about my score.

    15. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god, my ballz are fuckin itchy

    16. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, the beer is not twenty feet from you, its inside me, and I'm pretty sure you're not in my living room.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    17. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The third sign consists of seven angels with seven golden bowls filled with the wrath of God, but Revelations 15 has nothing to do with this.
      Uhm... that would be Revelation 15. no 's'.
    18. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it was postulated that if the universe was truly infinite then an exact replica of you existed

      Faulty logic - the set of square numbers is infinitely large, but does not contain 3. An infinite number of universes does not imply that every singe eventuality is contained in them.

      10^100 light years away, because that's how much volume of space would be required to store all possible combinations/arrangements of matter that exist in the known/visible universe - at about 10^100 light years you'd have a duplicate arrangement.

      That assumes that all that is possible is what we know about.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    19. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      We are the most visible civilization of the Solar System. And very possibly the only one. Of all the planets we have directly observed, the Earth is the only one to harbor visible life. We never managed to recreate cells spontaneously from amino acids, we don't exactly know how this occurred, we can not compute the probability of such an event. It could very well be unique to our planet's exact condition or it could be very common.

      Don't call faith common sense ;-)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    20. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by wtansill · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that logically, if you look past the hubris and near-sightedness of our race we are most likely not alone.
      Actually, we probably are. Gort and his robot buddies likely finished off all the other races because there was no one there to scream "Klattu baradda nictu" before the laser beams went off. Sheesh!
      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    21. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by beckerist · · Score: 1

      because that's how much volume of space would be required to store all possible combinations/arrangements of matter that exist in the known/visible universe - at about 10^100 light years you'd have a duplicate arrangement.

      Google has tons of dupes...
    22. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      And anyway, caves on Mars are cool.

      You really haven't thought of the flood of Sci-Fi channel movies we're going to be hit with?

      "Sci-Fi Channel presents, Spelunker. A team of Martian astronauts are ordered into a Martian cave, and encounter more than they're ready for. With Paris Hilton, Pauly Shore, Michael Shanks, and Lance Henriksen."

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    23. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      Dammit, that my obligatory Futurama reference!

      You know it mine because I no use good grammar.

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    24. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person that when read this thought "Spray the inside with glass and pressurize!"? Like Siberia and elsewhere on earth, once you get down about 5 feet (probably 20-50 feet in Mars' case) the ground temp is universally about 55 degrees. Ok it might be closer to 32 degrees without an atmosphere, but that's certianly hospitible, and if the power goes out for a week your water supply won't freeze solid and you can survive until you figure something out. Power goes out for 24 hours on the surface durring "winter" on mars and you're screwed.
       
      A base station 300x300x400 feet is nothing to sneeze at when you only have to seal the walls and build a ceiling.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    25. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse a propaganda campaign by NASA with what scientists actually think. Nobody working in the field is the least surprised by caves on Mars. But NASA need to make press releases and hype them up a bit.

      I think you are overreacting. NASA makes a lot of press releases. Most are ignored by most media. Those that "catch on" in the news versus those that don't are purely outside of NASA's control.

    26. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by escher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No problem. You shoot a nuke down a bug hole, you got a lot of dead bugs.

    27. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by cnettel · · Score: 1

      You assume a planet that's geologically active. Mars is dead. There are no great reserves of inner waste heat that are slowly leaking out. (Unless the radioactive decay alone, through conduction, would be enough to keep the temperature at that level, although I doubt it. Also remember that Mars is far smaller, decay would basically be per unit of volume, but the resulting heat is then distributed per unit of surface, over the thin "shell" that we are still discussing here.)

    28. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by cnettel · · Score: 1

      It's the pigeonhole principle. If we are basically right about what combinations are possible we don't know that some exact copy of ourselves will exist anywhere. What we do know is that we will have areas of space, similar in size to our observable universe, that are completely alike. It may be the really dull areas where there is no single planet to be found (but then assumptions about a basically homogeneous universe would break down). It would be kind of cool to "know" about a copy of me, but I still find it a staggering thought that there would be copies at all. Just think about the hashing problem when you try to put them in the database of Google 'verse!

    29. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Hm. I thought that the pressure was what kept the earth's core at such a temperature, and that plate tectonics were just a unique feature to our planet (plate techtonics being the primary yard stick to determine geological "life"). As I understand it, plate tectonics is a relatively new (30 yo) theory, and does not itself determine wether or not the planet core is "hot".

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    30. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      You really haven't thought of the flood of Sci-Fi channel movies we're going to be hit with?

      "Sci-Fi Channel presents, Spelunker. A team of Martian astronauts are ordered into a Martian cave, and encounter more than they're ready for. With Paris Hilton, Pauly Shore, Michael Shanks, and Lance Henriksen." That sounds more like a bad porn movie to me.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    31. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by bhiestand · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of all the planets we have directly observed, the Earth is the only one to harbor visible life. So which planets are harboring invisible life, and how can we destroy them?
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    32. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that using earth as center of a reference frame means that the orbit of the sun, the planets and other stars is going to look quite strange. Some frames of reference are more useful and less complicated than others.

    33. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earth is considered to revolve around the sun because the suns gravity holds it in orbit.

    34. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree with you 100 percent, this universe is huge there is no way that we can by the only living beings in the universe. its too big and we dont no nearly enough about space to come to the conclusion we are the only ones.

  2. Wait, what? by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why does the article keep switching back and forth between "we think they might be caves" and "we're certain they really are caves"? Let me know when they've made up their minds about whether or not they've made up their minds, and I'll start caring about these (possible) caves.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sign me up to travel 2 weeks on a spaceship to Mars so that I can live in a cave!

    2. Re:Wait, what? by bhsurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      My company's crack Marketing team probably got subcontracted out to them. You want a non-binding non-decision about something we aren't qualified to discuss? You got it!

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    3. Re:Wait, what? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Arne Saknussemm; where are you now that we need you?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:Wait, what? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2 weeks? To Mars? I think you've got your scales a bit wrong.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to find something special in mines?

  3. Surprise? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We know Venus has mountains and valleys. We know Mars has mountains and valleys.

    Should be at all surprised to find caves on Mars?

    I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth, that formed the mountains and valleys. Aren't caves a natural extension of that thought process?

    I thought this was a given.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see the word "surprising" anywhere in the article. You do realize there's a difference between predicting something and confirming it, right?

    2. Re:Surprise? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      You need liquid water (or possibley some other liquid) to have plate activity like earth.
      Some of the solid planets (venus?) don't have signs of plate techtonics but have surfaces that are even all over.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:Surprise? by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mars does not have plate activity like earth.

      This is why Mars has larger mountains and deeper valleys than earth, because the one plate does not move, and that mountain on the top of the hotspot never moved away from the source of its growth.

    4. Re:Surprise? by Normal+Dan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have hypothesised about caves on other planets but have not seen any until this point. The fantastic thing is not that there are caves on Mars, but the fact that we may have found them. This new find could drastically change our future missions to Mars.

      --
      A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    5. Re:Surprise? by thelexx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speculation, no matter how informed and certain, is never as good as proof.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    6. Re:Surprise? by beckerist · · Score: 0

      You need liquid water (or possibley some other liquid) to have plate activity like earth

      Wow...totally wrong. It's due to the immense pressure our mantle is under, and the fact that the materials it contains turn to a plastic-like substance, with very low viscosity. This allows for things to flow over it much like ice or a liquid, but does in no way require water.
    7. Re:Surprise? by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Well, not totally wrong.
      While I see no reason why water is 100% required for plate activity, I am pretty sure water and other fluids play a big role in the heat transfer and melting at subduction zones.
      So, while the plates don't float around on water like styrofoam boxes in a swimming pool, there is water involved in the mechanics of our plate tectonics.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Surprise? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth, that formed the mountains and valleys. Aren't caves a natural extension of that thought process?
      Not necessarily. Most caves on earth are not caused by pyroclastic flow, but rather by (acidic) flowing water dissolving calcite in limestone.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:Surprise? by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      Actually, geology of different worlds can be quite different. As far as I know, there are not many (if any) bodies outside of earth that has plate tectonics in the solar system (although I think I remember hearing that there might be evidence that similar processes might be taking place on Titan).

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    10. Re:Surprise? by mykdavies · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth"

      Quite the opposite actually: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics#Plate _tectonics_on_other_planets ...it has been proposed that the mechanisms of plate tectonics may *once*[4BY ago] have been active on [Mars]...

      Venus shows no evidence of active plate tectonics. There is debatable evidence of active tectonics in the planet's distant past.

      Some of the satellites of Jupiter have features that may be related to plate-tectonic style deformation, although the materials and specific mechanisms may be different from plate-tectonic activity on Earth.

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    11. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth,
      >that formed the mountains and valleys. Aren't caves a natural extension of that thought process?

      No. Plate activity doesn't create caves. What gave you that silly idea?

      By your logic, why not expect trees?

    12. Re:Surprise? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      In any case, caves are mostly formed by erosion and not tectonic activity. Water isn't necessary, but some sort of fluid is (notice I said fluid and not liquid -- air is a fluid).

      The types of caves we normally think about on Earth are almost all formed by the flow of liquid water, dissolution of rock in water, and/or widening of cracks in rock by ice. If we find the types of caves on Mars that we have on Earth, there's a good chance they were formed by the presence of lots of liquid water at one time or another.

    13. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars does not have tectonic plate activity.

    14. Re:Surprise? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      You mean it's just rumour that the caves
      on mars are not hangers for UFOs?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    15. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...totally wrong. It's due to the immense pressure our mantle is under, and the fact that the materials it contains turn to a plastic-like substance, with very low viscosity. This allows for things to flow over it much like ice or a liquid, but does in no way require water.

      Wow... totally wrong, and so certain in one's wrongness!

      We saw a demonstration of this in my Astronomy class in college at one point. They were wondering why Venus has mountains that seemed impossibly tall (mountains on Earth that steep would spread out and get lower in the process), so they took a rock and placed it under intense pressure and, after a time (a day or a week, don't recall the exact interval) you could see that it had deformed like Silly-Putty under the intense pressure. They then took another rock just like and baked it at extreme temperatures for a week to get all the moisture out, and then repeated the experiment, and the rock didn't deform a bit.

      It's the presense of water, permeating everything on Earth, including the rock in the Earth's mantle, that causes them to turn into a plastic-like substance under extreme pressure.

      Incidentally, it appears Venus doesn't have plate techtonics, at least not like Earth. Not surprising, given the lack of water, despite all the other obvious similarities in size and composition.

    16. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. Most caves on earth are not caused by pyroclastic flow, but rather by (acidic) flowing water dissolving calcite in limestone. My gut tells me that this is not how geomorphology works.
    17. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speculation, no matter how informed and certain, is never as good as proof.

      That's a more elaborate way of saying "Show us the pix or it didn't happen!"

    18. Re:Surprise? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think it might have something to do with giant earthworms.

    19. Re:Surprise? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Speculation, no matter how informed and certain, is never as good as proof.

      Dude, you just need to smoke more weed.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    20. Re:Surprise? by rwwyatt · · Score: 1

      After all, they all ready found the holes on uranus

    21. Re:Surprise? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Caves could be a good indication that there was errosion caused by liquid, and moreover, it could have protected evidences linked to that erosion from the martian winds, so it is not only cool, it's really worth sending a probe into one of them.

    22. Re:Surprise? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      You seem to know very very little about the process of subduction

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    23. Re:Surprise? by beckerist · · Score: 1

      How is that at all relevant? And still has nothing to do with water!

    24. Re:Surprise? by Skrpune · · Score: 1

      Plate tectonics and the presence of water have nothing to do with each other. And caves and plate tectonics have nothing to do with each other either. Caves are generally created by underground waterflow - some rock types have more of a tendency to be "dissolved" by water because of their chemical makeup. When water passes through and starts to dissolve the rock, it leaves a void behind...and with more water flow there's more dissolving and a larger and larger void...and over time this creates cave systems.

      It is incredibly difficult to do photo-geology - in most cases, you can't just look at a picture of a rock surface & know what's going on with any sort of certainty. Any geologist who took a structural geology course and didn't sleep through it should know that this type of theorizing by photographs is just speculation. A two-dimensional image is a poor representation of a three-dimensional object and does not in any way, shape, or form tell the whole story. Now if they got a probe down in that area to look at the dark spots from different angles and to do some sampling and get some other evidence to support the idea that there are caves there, THEN this can move out of the speculation category.

    25. Re:Surprise? by Retric · · Score: 1

      Nope. What you think of as rock acts like a fluid but water is not a significant player.

      Anyway seduction zones are related to heat transfer in that heat transfer is what causes the plates to move in the first place.

      Think of it like air. Hot air rises but the temperature drops as you go to the top of Mount Everest because the air pressure drops. If you compress the air on top of Everest you would get the same temperature as the air at its base. The same thing happens to rock. As it is sub ducted its temperature goes up in large part because of the increase in pressure. (Note: There is some heat transfer involved but no where near 100% of the reasons the rocks melt.)

    26. Re:Surprise? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      An oceanic plate ordinarily slides underneath a continental plate.
      etc....

      And there's a bit on the chemistry.

      And we all know that there's no water on the oceanic plate don't we.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    27. Re:Surprise? by oliverthered · · Score: 1
      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  4. spelunking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spelunking
    spe-lunk-ing
    noun
    the hobby or practice of exploring caves

    +1 for obscurity

    1. Re:spelunking by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      the hobby or practice of exploring caves

      +1 for obscurity In what universe, exactly, is the definition of common words considered "obscure" please?
    2. Re:spelunking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what universe is the word spelunking considered common?

    3. Re:spelunking by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      This one.

      I'm proud you passed your ESL course, though. Keep manning those call centers, HP owners need support!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:spelunking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obscure? Hardly.

      In any case, it's no longer the accepted term for the hobby..."caving" is.

    5. Re:spelunking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ESL course? I've been in Canada since I was 5. Not to mention I'm a Caucasian European - nice stereotype though, you racist prick. I just looked up the term on Wikipedia - first used in the 40s in the States and now carries a negative connotation. So its a word more likely to be used in the States than anywhere else. Not to mention that it's a term that's more likely to be known by people who explore caves.

      Good job though with your incorrect assumptions though - now why don't you be a good little American and go eat some more McDonald's.

    6. Re:spelunking by 808140 · · Score: 1

      While the GP was certainly rude and racist, spelunking is by no means an uncommon word. Even among those folks that don't like caves (for example, me, I'm claustrophobic) spelunking would hardly be considered obscure. But don't take it too hard; we all run across words that we don't know simply because we, for whatever reason, haven't been exposed to them.

      For a pop-culture reference, in the South Park movie there was a great line that incorporated the term: "Eat penguin shit you ass spelunker."

      I love that line...

    7. Re:spelunking by mad.frog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, "spelunking" isn't really used in that way (at least in the USA) by people who regularly explore caves; "caving" is the preferred term.

      For reasons that aren't completely clear, "spelunker" has come to mean "person who goes in caves without proper equipment or training" among American cavers. (At caving conventions, you'll see bumper stickers that read "Cavers Rescue Spelunkers".)

      See Wikipedia for more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caving

      For more info in general (at least on USA caving), check out the website of the National Speleological Society: http://www.caves.org/

      or the chat forum, http://www.cavechat.org/

    8. Re:spelunking by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      For more info in general (at least on USA caving), check out the website of the National Speleological Society

      Ah, you mean the National Spelunking Society? :)

  5. Ack Ack Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We come in peace!

    Ack Ack Ack! Ack Ack ACKACK!

    Do not run! We are your friends!

    1. Re:Ack Ack Ack! by bhsurfer · · Score: 0, Redundant
      They came in peace!

      [cue disintegration in 5...4...3...]

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Ack Ack Ack! by sean4u · · Score: 1

      It's okay - my mum has every Slim Whitman album there ever was.

      All we need is a record player... we're dead.

  6. Looks like just a shadow by BigGar' · · Score: 1

    The same kind of thing as the "face". I think they're jumping way ahead by calling these cave entrances.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    1. Re:Looks like just a shadow by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The same kind of thing as the "face". I think they're jumping way ahead by calling these cave entrances.

      It's both: the nostrills are caves. Zardoz lives!

  7. "Qua-a-a-a-id...." by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Start the generator, Quaid."

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:"Qua-a-a-a-id...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Start the reactor, Quaid."

      Turn in your geek card now please.

  8. need a cave crawler by wkk2 · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the next rover needs to be powered with an RTG and have a spool of fiber to link with a base antenna.

  9. They're not caves... by brennanw · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... they're where the Martians store all their canal-boats till next thaw.

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
  10. No matter how much changes... by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Caves on Mars could become habitats for future explorers...

    Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that as humans move out into space we may yet again end up living in caves?

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    1. Re:No matter how much changes... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      It's not without precedent. I'm buying my own house soon and plan on mostly living in the finished basement.

    2. Re:No matter how much changes... by masdog · · Score: 1

      If you live in the basement, where are your kids going to live when they get older?

    3. Re:No matter how much changes... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Informative
      > Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that as humans move out into space we may yet again end up living in caves?

      It's no more interesting than the fact that people on Mars will probably wear shoes, just like upper paleolithic humans. In fact, less interesting because caves have never played a significant role in human habitation. Humans have lived all over the world, but how many of those places do you think have caves?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:No matter how much changes... by ACE209 · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too. :)

      And perhaps if the first martian colonists will truly live there, they may sometimes think: "Damn should have stayed in the good ol' caves on earth!"

      Here some imaginary mod points.

      --
      "we are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
    5. Re:No matter how much changes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The attic.... A very underestimated nerd dwelling place. I spent most of my University years in one ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:No matter how much changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a barrel of laughs at a party.

    7. Re:No matter how much changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is more to just building a vehicle and being able to reach X place and establishing a civilization.

      There are factors from space that we haven't been able to overcome that has halted our progess in the space field. I mean, we were able to go to the moon with technology from the 1950's, its 2007 and with all of the the tremendous advancements, it's pretty obvious that we should have had humans on Mars already. But the aforementioned problem is the Sun. It releases Solarwinds several times a week that will ruin electrical signals, burn objects and even scramble genetic code.

      Right now no one knows of a way to repel/stop the winds. A 'fast' trip to Mars would take around 8 Months. 8 Months x 4 weeks per month = 32 weeks, 32 weeks x several solarwind blasts per week = No human exploration of Mars for a long time.

      We were lucky to have landed on the Moon because it only takes a couple days. Humans aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

  11. I have a Bad Feeling about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's not a cave, at all...

  12. caves a good spot to land by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mars has no global magnetic field to deflect solar radiation which means that when humans go there they will be exposed to alot of deadly radiation- if we want to stay on mars we need a place that is safe- caves are one such place. they shield agaisnt radiation and make it easier to build habitats. this discovery could allow humans to colonize mars.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:caves a good spot to land by HarvardAce · · Score: 2, Funny
      caves a good spot to land

      We have enough problem landing on flat ground on Mars...now you want to land in a cave? Good luck with that!

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    2. Re:caves a good spot to land by barakn · · Score: 1

      this discovery could allow humans to colonize mars
      Yes, because it would be impossible to create an artificial cave.
      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    3. Re:caves a good spot to land by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      We live in a mobile home. It's like a cave, with wheels. You can go places. Except we never went anywhere.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:caves a good spot to land by dan828 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it's not like we're going to ship a backhoe to mars any time soon, so finding some pre-existing holes in the ground to use just might make establishment of a base just a tad bit more convenient.

    5. Re:caves a good spot to land by smaddox · · Score: 1

      The magnetic field has a much smaller effect on radiation than its atmosphere does, and Mars's atmosphere extends about twice as high as earths (11km compared to 6km http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Mars/ ) and is composed almost entirely of CO2, compared to oxygen and nitrogen for earth (not to mention the large amounts of dust suspended in the Martian atmosphere.)

      I'm no astronomer, but it seems to me that radiation would be the least of our problems. I would be much more worried about keeping warm.

    6. Re:caves a good spot to land by turgid · · Score: 1

      So, which one of you is CAPTAIN CAVEMAN! and where are the Teen Angels?

    7. Re:caves a good spot to land by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      We live in a mobile home. It's like a cave, with wheels. You can go places. Except we never went anywhere.
      +1 The Last Starfighter reference!
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    8. Re:caves a good spot to land by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'll give you that. More convenient.. for the giant creature with a mouth that looks like a cave.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    9. Re:caves a good spot to land by confused+one · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If we do try to establish a permanent presence, like a "base" on Mars, we will need to do exactly this kind of thing: "ship a backhoe to Mars." Not a backhoe in the traditional sense; but, this kind of equipment will be required to set up the infrastructure and build the first permanent habitations. Not to mention the need for heavy equipment for acquiring raw materials, to begin development of locally available resources. In the first years, you will be far, far from self sustaining and just about everything, including all kinds of equipment and supplies, will need to be shipped to the surface of Mars.

      The first trip will be a round trip mission to leave footprints, a few flags, and gather some rocks. They will take everything they need for the duration of the journey.

      Any missions to build a permanent presence, will likely have to be proceeded by years of equipment drops at the settlement site, so that when the first people arrive, there are crates and crates of supplies and equipment sitting there, waiting to be opened and used. Going to Mars in any kind of semi-permanent way will be the logistical nightmare of (truly) epic proportions.

  13. Great habitats... by posterlogo · · Score: 1

    They would also offer a modest amount of protection to future human explorers. The thin atmosphere of Mars offers no protection against solar radiation, so lots of solid rock would be our best bet (though it will be pretty cold in there).

    1. Re:Great habitats... by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a nice place to hide from the Martians...

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    2. Re:Great habitats... by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a nice place to hide from the Martians...

      That's assuming the Martians are currently occupying those very same caves...

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    3. Re:Great habitats... by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      That's assuming the Martians are currently occupying those very same caves...

      Errr, damn typo. That should be> ...aren't currently occupying...

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  14. Black Areas by AeroIllini · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...said Glenn Cushing of Northern Arizona University, who first spotted the black areas in the photographs. "Uh oh, looks like someone smudged the photo."

    *rubs finger on photo*

    "Hmm. Guess they're caves, then."
    --
    For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    1. Re:Black Areas by G-funk · · Score: 1

      See this dark patch that looks like my fingerprint? No, that's trauma!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  15. But are they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inhabited by anthropomorphic billionaire bats?

  16. Radio signals? by kinocho · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought about this? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078748/

    1. Re:Radio signals? by AtlasAxe · · Score: 1

      Yes you are. I think most were probably thinking of this: http://imdb.com/title/tt0116996/.

      Don't run, we are your friends.

    2. Re:Radio signals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, I was thinking of this :
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067992/

  17. Old news by mypalmike · · Score: 1

    People have known about, and even explored, these caverns of Mars for over two decades.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  18. 2001 A space odyssey by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Part of the symbolism of the space baby at the end of the movie is that people are masters of the Earth, but we're infants in space. We're vulnerable, and have to learn and practice even simple things like moving from one end of the spacecraft to the other in a spacesuit. We wear diapers up there.

    If we're going to be on Mars, it is therefore fitting that we should be cavemen. That's where we started, and that's where we will start again.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:2001 A space odyssey by VWJedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's hard to believe that such an insightful statement could come from a "Profane MuthaFucka".

    2. Re:2001 A space odyssey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fucking shit.

    3. Re:2001 A space odyssey by ACE209 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ok - lets try to cry for mommy then

      but to be serious - do you really believe we're grown ups here on earth?

      --
      "we are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
    4. Re:2001 A space odyssey by rarel · · Score: 1

      But... But...

      If astronauts become cavemen, then who fights who...? And WHO WINS?

      *head explodes*

    5. Re:2001 A space odyssey by RoboRay · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cavemen on Mars? That could be a new GEICO commercial!

    6. Re:2001 A space odyssey by owlnation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we're going to be on Mars, it is therefore fitting that we should be cavemen. That's where we started, and that's where we will start again.
      Agreed. But with one teensy caveat. We shouldn't make the same mistakes again.
    7. Re:2001 A space odyssey by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read my journal. You'll find a mix of stuff there that I like to think is insightful, as well as some sick shit that I'm particularly proud of.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  19. You know i just dont get it by cchance · · Score: 1
    How can people think that the universe is empty, I mean realistically we're still descovering new species on our own planet, we only recently discovered the ice on mars and now caves on mars, and thats in our solar system on a close planet, not even the further planets, or god forbid other solar systems it just doesn't make sense to not atleast have a little belief that theirs life somewhere out their in some form or another.

    Chris | NexTechNews | St. Maarten Live

    1. Re:You know i just dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run-on sentence (should be about 5 separate sentences). Spelling errors ("descover", "thats", "out their"). I give it an "F".

      - General writing Nazi

  20. WHAT? by corifornia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holes? In the ground?

    --
    crap.
    1. Re:WHAT? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      What is this, the set-up to a Hobbit reference?

  21. This is old news. Have you been hiding in a cave? by Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  22. Don't forget the "or" clause by Dareth · · Score: 1

    "or could be the only structures that preserve evidence of past or present microbial life

    And the best way to find out if they are there and like to eat people is to have some move in.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  23. Send up the Mobile Infantry! by rez_rat · · Score: 1

    We've found the Arachnids!

  24. No one else is saying it so I will by DarrenR114 · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome news of our new Martian overlords.

    --
    Been there, Done that, Sold the t-shirt to the next idiot in line
  25. Obligatory /. Cliche with New Word by onkelonkel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new Subarean Overlords....

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  26. Surface caves? by grouchobear · · Score: 1

    Umm, the last time I checked a cave was underground. How is it that there are caves on the surface? Wow, Mars has some very interesting physical properties.

    1. Re:Surface caves? by timjdot · · Score: 1


      Maybe the caves are the entrances to the tunnels. At least that's what my conspiracy friend points out in the photos. You can clearly see the tunnels in other mars photographs. Hard to believe they are random acts of nature.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
  27. Caves = water? by Kaeles · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that most of the caves on our planet were formed by underground rivers, and rivers that had dried up long time ago after the iceage / flooding / dinosaurs or whatnot....

    So does this mean that there is water on mars for sure?
    Maybe all of the water activity is just below the surface, because all the rest evaporated off, and the rivers continue to flow, forming new caves!

    1. Re:Caves = water? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Forget water! Think about all the limestone!

      --
      AccountKiller
  28. Cue scene from The Empire Strikes Back by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    Princess Leia: The cave is collapsing!
    Han Solo: This is no cave...
    Princess Leia: What?!

    Mind you, things could be a lot worse. It's not like NASA has told us that contrary to all expectations, the thing orbiting the Earth is not a moon, it's a space station...

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  29. They found Osama! by chillmost · · Score: 1
    1. Re:They found Osama! by extern_void · · Score: 0

      So McDonals's should increase security.

  30. It Still Amazes Me... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...that we haven't yet planned on sending any kind of excavation equipment to do archaeological digs on Mars. I suspect that if we do, we'll be very surprised to find evidence of previous intelligent life and whole civilizations that existed quadrillions of years ago. At the least we could do an entire deep sonar survey of the planet to find potential digging sites. I should run NASA. I always come up with the good ideas.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:It Still Amazes Me... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I suspect that if we do, we'll be very surprised... If you suspect that you're going to be surprised, then it can't be a surprise after all. This is a consequence of a theorem from probability theory: your expectation of what you think your future expectation of something should be must match your current expectation of it.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:It Still Amazes Me... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Nice. But I wouldn't be surprised at all. I expect if we dig deep enough on Mars we'll find all sorts of interesting artifacts of ancient civilizations and alien remains. But I think most rational scientists would be very surprised because they don't expect that sort of thing until they do all this useless preamble stuff first. I say just go with the gut and dig in! I, for one, welcome our gigantic eight-legged skull people skeletons.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  31. coming soon to a theme park near you by swschrad · · Score: 1

    gigantic red murderous Martian cave bears....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  32. Not quite by novus+ordo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually Mars and Venus don't have any major plate activity and haven't for Millions of years(see wikipedia). It's also why they have weak magnetic fields as the internal dynamo is what sustains a magnetic field. Internal dynamo drives plate tectonics which are sustained by the cooling action of surface and core exchanges.
    Mars is dead geologically, meaning that it has no volcanic activity and we think that the core has (probably) hardened.
    Incidentally, Venus is a much better candidate for colonization, but currently it's a little too hot due to the runaway greenhouse effect (it's surface is 450C). Probes sent there melt and get crushed do to surface pressure soon after they land. It's also a good example for those people who say there is no global warming. Look no further than our bastard twin planet.

    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    1. Re:Not quite by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Who says there is no global warming? Nobody? But if you're right about Venus then what it really says is that we can ignore all the whahoos like Al Gore and go back about our business. Unless you're going to claim that humans are responsible for the 450*C temperatures on other planets.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    2. Re:Not quite by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      I hate that tired old argument. Does it matter if it is humans that are causing it? After it's run its course there won't be any left to debate what the hell caused it.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    3. Re:Not quite by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Are you for real? If humans spewing CO2 isn't the cause of global warming then how is stopping the spew the soulution?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    4. Re:Not quite by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      The man has a point. Species have gone extinct on their own in Earth's past - but we have most decidely forced some into extinction ourselves too.

      Apply this to greenhouse effects - they can occur naturally, but there is a large scientific basis to say that we can cause them too. Venus is a prime example of how badly a greenhouse effect can screw up a planet. In the technical sense, Venus is actually at the edge (but still WITHIN) the solar system's habitable zone (Mars is also within it but at the other end of the spectrum). So if not for the screwed up atmosphere (and rotation), Venus would likely be a good place to be.

      Naturally I'll not live long enough to know if they ever pull it off, but it'd be interesting to see what exactly we can do with Venus' regarding terraforming in a few hundred (or even thousand) years.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Not quite by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      The same way that feeding a fire with fuel is not the way to stop it.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    6. Re:Not quite by Petersson · · Score: 1
      Well, it might well be a Manbearpig caused global warming. With no Al Gore on Venus, the Manbearpig is ruling over the planet.

      Possible solution: send Al Gore to Venus.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
  33. Why assume caves? by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they be drains or chimneys or even potholes? Or the Navals of Mars? Wouldn't that make a good Science Fiction novel?

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  34. Re:The next news articles we'll see related to thi by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

    Sorry, forgot to enclose that in tags.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  35. Original science presentation by jespley · · Score: 1

    FYI, here's the original science presentation that the news reports are based on. It's an abstract from the recent Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. This means that the work hasn't yet been peer reviewed but it's still interesting. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1371 .pdf

  36. Re:Surprise? Drains! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on...They are not caves but are, in effect, drains. Where do you think all the Martian water went? The canals lead to the drains of course.

  37. Or they could be... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...just very deep, unremarkable holes.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Or they could be... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the fact that there are deep holes is remarkable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Robinson Crusoe was living in them 40 years ago by schwit1 · · Score: 1
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058530/

    Batman was his copilot.

    1. Re:Robinson Crusoe was living in them 40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Robinson Crusoe was living in them 40 years ago

      I think you meant, "40 light years ago!"

  39. There are several ways caves form... by Like2Byte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are solutional caves - caves formed by water - and there are lava-tube caves - caves (lava tubes, actually) formed by molten rock. When molten lava cools around other hotter lava, the hotter lava travels around the cooler, more solid, lava and sometimes drains out enough to create a pocket of, well, emptiness. Often times, lava tubes are not discovered until the ground gives way and opens into a pit to access the tube. Hawaii has lots of Lava tubes as do many areas near volcanoes.

    On Earth, the ground breaks up due to water-action and other biological means (animals, bacteria, humans, etc...). I'm sure on Mars there's another method to break open a lava tube...sandblasting due to a large storm on Mars' surface and the occasional meteorite.

    It's no surprise that Mars has caves - it makes sense. Whether or not those caves are solutional is what is important here.

  40. If we missed this... by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Humans have been scrutinizing Mars to the best of their ability given available technology for centuries. We have sent probes to map the surface multiple times and robots to probe in various ways. And all this time we missed seven caves whose openings were larger than football fields (and in some cases larger than two football fields) which just happen to be near one of the most prominent features we know about. Whether these features are caves or not, the facts of their size and location should be a wakeup call to us as far as the limitations of our efforts thus far. Who knows what else we are missing; one must also wonder at the difficulty of finding microbes on a planet where we were unable to detect features of this size.

    I hope one day we can place colonies on Mars, as inhospitable as it is. Once we have done that we will be in a better position to explore the planet as we have ours. Every time we think we have found everything worth finding on Mars and further exploration will not yield any results that change our impression that it is a dull, lifeless planet whose only saving grace is that it is nearby we find something that surprises us. We can only hope this trend continues.

  41. Re:Old news by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    Scary...I remember that game, pretty fondly actually. I had it for my Atari 400 as a kid. I remember putting quite a lot of time into it, though I don't think you could ever "win". It just kept getting harder.

  42. point B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your point b flies in the presence of thousands of credible sightings of UFOs over the years, all over the planet. Sure, a lot can be explained away, but there are *numerous* sightings that defy any explanation other than outsiders and intelligently steered craft. Have you even watched the disclosure project video, or kept up with the news of many foreign governments now have opened their files, including sightings by verified trained pilots? Heck, I know of an entire neighborhood that had a landing sighting back in the 60s, including a few cars of the local cops who came in to see it. It landed and hung out for ten minutes or so, then took off again, in a clearing off a city park. I talked to several folks in the neighborhood who all saw it.

    Now, given our success with stealth technology, doesn't it stand to reason why we don't have more sightings, given some civilization even one thousand years more advanced than we are? When they are seen, they either don't care about being seen, or perhaps are having equipment malfunctions. It could be they are holding off mass "hello, we are here!" until humanity evolves past our medieval stage (we are still in it, just with better tech, socially we are little different from the middle ages still). Perhaps there is some sort of prime directive, it is certainly logical enough. We are getting there (slow but sure) with what remains of our wilderness areas.

    Now, go outside at night, look up, ponder...the odds are NOT in favor of us being alone in the universe. Just WAY too many galaxies and other star systems out there. And life is surprisingly robust, every year they find evidence of life in eXtreme conditions, lava vents underwater and so forth.

  43. Space Exploration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So easy even a caveman can do it.

    (I have just made a formidable enemy.)

  44. um... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    NASA is a space agency, so it could be a hole in space. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. Re:Many dupes found from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got modded down, but I remembered reading that article on Slashdot a few weeks ago. Sure enough, there it was! We really need a dupe-checker around here - or maybe the system could take away karma for submitting dupes (i.e. not checking if the story was posted earlier.)

  46. Funding -- now! :o by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Wow, interesting news indeed! This, combined with the theories we may have fluid water not too far below the surface, is very interesting.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  47. Hangers? by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Now we know Sadam hid those WMDs somewhere...

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  48. Re:Cue scene from The Empire Strikes Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's too big to be a space station.

  49. Re:Cue scene from The Empire Strikes Back by scottblascocomposer · · Score: 1
    Bah. What does NASA know?

    Now this guy Art Bell, on the other hand...

    --
    To reign is to serve.
  50. Back to school Zonk! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    There are NOT caves on the SURFACE - the whole point of caves is they are inside something you know ;)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  51. Compliment? by Voyager-2 · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    The football-field sized holes were observed by Mars Odyssey's Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) and have been dubbed the seven sisters --Dena, Chloe, Wendy, Annie, Abbey, Nikki and Jeanne--after loved ones of the researchers who found them.

    Naming a bunch of massive holes after their girlfriends...that should probably read 'ex-loved ones'.

  52. Blue String Soup by slashnik · · Score: 1

    Great we are one step closer to finding the blue string soup.

  53. Found 'em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So THAT'S where Osama has been hiding!!

  54. aracas ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    worm sign !

  55. Moholes dug by the First Hundred by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    Nothing new here, move along. Obviously the NASA has only stumbled across a couple of nive round moholes dug by the first hundred.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  56. Re:Old news by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Damn, I made that joke the first time this story was reported on Slashdot. Yep, it's another dupe...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  57. Caves on Mars by bronsinbound · · Score: 1

    And THAT is where the Trolls from Trollhatten originated;^) For those that don't know, the trolls make the Saab autos!