Slashdot Mirror


1-800-Google Launches

The Webguy wrote to mention a C|Net article talking about Google's newest toy - Local Voice Search. The service is dirt simple: you call a 1-800 number and, via voice recognition software, say the category of business you're trying to reach. You can also try for a specific name, though the C|Net blogger had some problems with that. The Google Blog has been updated with details as well: "Google Voice Local Search lets you search for local businesses from any phone and for free. If you're in the US, call 1-800-GOOG-411 and say what you want to find. Here are some of the features -You can find a business listing by category. Just say "pizza," for example. You can send the listing details to your mobile phone via SMS. The service is fully automated, so it doesn't rely on human operators. It connects you directly to the business, free of charge."

39 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Hello, Google? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nookie."

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
    1. Re:Hello, Google? by Kindgott · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, Craigslist's new phone service is 1-800-GOOG-412.

      --
      If there's anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot immediately.
  2. Cool! by Aminion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally there is an easy way of calling 911!

    1. Re:Cool! by duguk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only in America. In the UK you have to call 0118 999 88199 9119 725 3!

  3. Impressive by QBasicer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's impressive to think the resources it would take to run this service. I wonder what software they use to do the voice recognition.

    --
    x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
    1. Re:Impressive by The-Ixian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am surprised to hear someone say this. I have actually been very impressed with current voice recognition voice systems. I use HP, FedEx and Microsoft's voice recognition systems regularly and have only had a problem with recognition in very noisy environments.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder what software they use to do the voice recognition.
      Google has a lot of natural language processing and speech recognition researchers on their staff; I suspect that it is a home-brew solution.
  4. I wonder... by had3l · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if it recognizes "Escort Services".

    *sigh* who am I kidding?

    1. Re:I wonder... by SagSaw · · Score: 5, Funny

      For fun, I tried "Prostitutes". The #1 match:

      International Aid, a local Christian charity.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    2. Re:I wonder... by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch out, or you might end up hiring an armed guard by accident ;-)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:I wonder... by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, let me tell you; I am over here in Philly, and I decided to ask it for escorts. The first two results were "Stacey Lacey" and "Ebony and Ivory." I started laughing loudly after that and it misinterpreted that as me wanting to "go back." I suppose that answers the question.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    4. Re:I wonder... by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Funny

      For fun, I tried "Prostitutes".

      I bet that sounded very different in your head.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  5. One Question... by sunami88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why? Doesn't Google do enough? Is anybody but me reminded of the dot-com boom? Big companies doing too much at once, gaining money/people at an alarming rate, and then inevitably crashing and burning. With every "BETA" they release I get more and more afraid one day I'll go to open my GMail and get a "Google has gone into Chapter 11" message or some such.

    --
    Sex. Drugs, and Unix.
    1. Re:One Question... by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One difference is that in the dot-com era, you saw companies valued billions operating in a market that was worth a fraction of that - in the hope that in the "new economy" there would suddenly be billions of new dollars pouring into all possible sectors of the economy. In contrast, Google is profitable, this service must have been set up with a smallish (50?) number of employees, and the DA 411 market is worth some 8 billion dollars per year - and that is before advertisement is taken into account. So your comparison does not run very deep.

    2. Re:One Question... by daeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a few key differences. First, Google is already profitable. Second, Google adds services over time, whereas many of the dot-com rushers tries to do everything at once. Google has the brand recognition and strong history to even the most novice of Internet users required that none of the dot-com guys, even with their tens of millions of marketing dollars, had.

      With Google being a public company, they have more incentive to retain services than other service companies. They have far more to lose if they close a service than if, say, Webmail.us folded, since e-mail is all Webmail.us does. That reason alone will force them to keep large, successful services like Gmail alive, even if it is eventually in a reduced form.

    3. Re:One Question... by ystar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google may see it as an investment in basic search technology - voice recognition might serve to "listen" to YouTube videos for time-sensitive ad-placement (see Google, i'm full of ideas, so hire me! =D ) If thousands of people try it and don't like it, they try to learn why, potentially improve it, or they have one of arguably several ideas that never went anywhere, and may or may not see the light of day again. Few bucks lost, price of research, etc. If it takes off, they stick local ads in it. I doubt this is really very harmful. Also, this is a great way of getting press...lots of computer-phobic people who have "heard" of this "googale" finally get to try it for free...

    4. Re:One Question... by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. So Google, like every other company that dominates a particular market, worries about saturating that same market. Even successful companies have to try new things if they want to keep growing. Google has thrown a lot of stuff at wall to see if it sticks, and this is yet another effort to establish an profitable market.

  6. So if the this is completely free of charge..... by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .... just how does Google plan to make money from this? Sure it takes away business from traditional directory based searches, but I still fail to see how the cash that those services would get end up in Google's pocket. I'm sure that if I'm missing something that /.'ers will point out what that something is.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  7. It's in response to a Microsoft move. by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's their answer to Microsoft's acquisition of TellMe. (1-800-555-TELL). Presumably, like TellMe, after a while they will add ads.

  8. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by aarku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, one idea is that they could sell what company shows up first in your area when you ask for "Pizza." That ought to be worth a lot.

  9. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    sure. you pay to have your business listed preferentially.
    If no business is preferential or there is a "tie" then the user gets a short voice advert "while we find your numbers" and gets connected.

    On a related note I got bored/frustrated with Delta airlines automated attendant some time ago and had lots of fun. Got into a sorta dialogue with the blasted thing then managed to end up in some sort of maintenance mode. Couldn't change any settings (required password, lord knows I tried) but I could monitor status.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  10. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by the_13th_saint · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see it as a way for them to know what people are searching for, just like their google search engine. You'd be surprised to know how much that sort of information can be worth to companies.

  11. Does this sign you up for phone spam? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can send the listing details to your mobile phone via SMS.


    Does this sign you up for phone spam?
    1. Re:Does this sign you up for phone spam? by pdhenry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Telemarketers are allowed to call your cell phone but they're not allowed to use automatic dialers (the kind that transfer you to an agent after you've answered) to call your cell phone. Since just about all telemarketers use automatic dialers this effectively kills telemarkting to cell phones.

    2. Re:Does this sign you up for phone spam? by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. I've been using the SMS-based version of this (Send an SMS with 'pizza' or 'weather' to 46645 (GOOGL)) and haven't received a single unsolicited message. It's unfortunate that spammers have given SMS such a bad repertoire. Everytime I see an SMS-based service that seems legitimate I am still leery of using it because I don't want SMS spam waking me in the middle of the night.

  12. I did it all for Tom Nook by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    Results: Tom Nook, The Nookie

  13. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by Panspechi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To me, it sounds like they are planning a slow takeover of VoIP by offering tidbits of functionality here and there, to regroup them all in the future as a mega-package...

  14. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by nernie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's been pretty clearly established by now that Google is not very concerned about the short term money-making prospects of most of the products that it launches. In the long term, ads can be added to anything, and there is probably even some less-tangible value to running a free service that people like and use. Besides, this was probably a 20% project that a handful of people got together and created in their free time--there's little to lose even if it turns out to be a catastrophic failure.

    There are so many threads lately where everybody whines about software companies that can't see anything other than the bottom line, even if it means getting sub-par workers to do a sub-par job. This is the other end of the spectrum, which is presumably what we'd all like to see more of. Why should you insist on questioning or worrying about what the short-term bottom line is? Given their earnings history, I'm plenty confident that Google is worrying about the money in the places it actually matters.

  15. Hello Google? by i_ate_god · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm feeling lucky

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  16. interesting by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Tried the number, and I'd say it works pretty well. I searched for "pizza" in "Scottsdale, Arizona", and it gave me quite a listing. I was also impressed that I only had to say "Flagstaff", and it knew automatically that it was in Arizona also (although there is also a Flagstaff, Maine, but I think that's a ghost town these days) ...

    Google also recognized the term "brewpub", and located my favorite one, too! :-)

    Sadly, they didn't understand my search for, "beer and hookers." But my search for "prostitites" in Scottsdale resulted in a response of, "We didn't find any exact matches, but here are a couple that come close ..." I got a kick out of the fourth listing they provided, which was for the Alliance Defense Fund,. . . (no joke ;-)

    An an unrelated note, if all of use call this number tonight, do you think it might be a first to "slashdot" a telephone? ;-) If we can slashdot Google's number, we should have CowboyNeal post a Telemarketer of the Week's number on slashdot ... try to bring down some truly useless and evil people,... :-)

  17. toll-free by steve426f · · Score: 2

    I noticed the service automatically connects you to the business. Does this mean that Google pays if you are transferred to a long-distance number (i.e. since your call is actually connected to 800-goog411)?

  18. Weird.... by theheff · · Score: 2, Funny

    When i asked for it to find porn in Oklahoma, it gave me the first three results:

    1. First Christian Church
    2. The local police department
    3. Animal Control

    Maybe it's just not the same as the real google.

  19. Free 411 by Esekla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems very much like 800-FREE-411 but hopefully without the ads?

  20. Re:So if the this is completely free of charge.... by joelpt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Possible motivations for Google:

    1. Further promote Google's value and brand in the minds of consumers and business owners alike. This is following in the same vein as the Google Local Business Center's completely free coupons that you can create for your business to appear on Google Maps. Call it good PR.

    2. Statistics. Useful not only to them, but to local business owners. Again, develops brand loyalty and is good PR.

    3. As part and parcel of 1 and 2, they hope that some of these local business owners will later purchase normal ads on Google.

    In short, even if the added revenue from 3 doesn't completely offset the cost of running this service, 1 and 2 add value in ways that are hard to directly quantify in monetary terms. Though I suspect they will indeed make more (regular Adwords/Adsense) revenue as a direct result of this service's availability than it costs to run it. The usual exorbitant $1.25 per 411 call is not even close to what it costs to run such a service (especially without human operators).

    4. Don't be evil. And while you're at it, if you can take out a few of the other evildoers out there, all the better! Google has taken the lessons of "disruptive technology" to heart, and it's worked for them time and again.

    As usual, Google wins by not being overly (or at least overtly) greedy. It's for this reason that I doubt we'll ever hear paid ads or purchased placement when calling the service.

  21. The technology behind it by dysonlu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google uses Nuance Communications' speech recognition engine. Even though Google has hired a few folks from Nuance a while ago, it is NOT using homebrew technology, at least not as far as the engine is concerned. And even if Google had planned to build their own engine (they have no good reason to, really), it would have taken longer than a couple of years and much more than a handful of ex-Nuance engineers to be able to come up with a competitive speech reco engine -- the entry bar is high, even for Google. But like I said: Google has no good reason to re-invente the well -- it would have been just ridiculous; heck, if they seriously wanted to own the engine, they could have bought Nuance (the pre-merger Nuance, not the merged-with-Scansoft Nuance) with their pocket change.

    1. Re:The technology behind it by the_povinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dyson, can you reveal how you got this information? Did you recognize the setup or something? Or do you have a mole?

      --
      The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
  22. "Miserable Failure" by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...
    *Bing!* "White House Operator. How may I direct your call?"

          Man, I *wish* that still worked.

  23. Creepy voice by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else think the voice is creepy? It's more realistic than other automated voice systems, but still doesn't sound human. Maybe they hit the uncanny valley.

    The voice was a guy though; perhaps that's what I think is wrong. All the other automated voices I've heard (local transit system, 1-800-free-411, etc; have all used female voices. Perhaps the softness of a female voice helps gloss over the realism flaws in the voice?

  24. I'm feeling lucky! by clayinpdx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google should add a 'I'm feeling lucky' option to the service, which would automatically dial the top-rated business for that category. That would be really exciting, especially if you're searching for something like 'escorts' and it dials the PD.