Slashdot Mirror


Animated Castlevania Movie Sounds Promising

Via GameSetWatch, a link to the official blog for the animated film Castlevania: Dracula's Curse. The story for the film is being written by the iconic Warren Ellis (Transmetropolitan, Planetary), and the blog has tidbits of information from the writer about what we can expect with the film. Encouragingly, the movie is very much not aimed at children, will probably be just the first of a planned trilogy, and is generally based around the story from Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse. From the GSW post: "He explains, grinning: 'To make it work as a film, I had to introduce new backstory, and I went through five drafts of the premise and three of the full outline to get the material where [Koji Igarashi] wanted it. He remains absolutely passionate about Castlevania. After eight rewrites of pre-production material, I remain absolutely passionate about beating the crap out of [Igarashi] in a dark alleyway one day.'"

74 comments

  1. Could be expensive by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't look forward to pumping rolls of quarters into my armrest's coin slot just to see how the movie ends.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  2. I'll be the first to say it... by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Certainly sounds more promising than the live action movie in the works, which should promise to be as true to the source material as...well...it won't be. Ugh...too bad Warren Ellis isn't writing the live action movie script...

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:I'll be the first to say it... by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think Van Helsing is about as close to a loyal film adaptation of Castlevania as we're going to get; it has all the right monsters, but is just shy by a bullwhip and a recognizable soundtrack.

      I look at it this way: at least Uwe Boll isn't going anywhere near it.

  3. Video Game Movies.... ulg by Applekid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Has any movie based off a video game not been basically a big F.U. to the original material?

    Super Mario Bros., Doom, Mortal Kombat, Resident Evil... it goes on and on.

    Next thing you'll know Keanu Reeves will be cast as a Belmont, and Christopher Walken will be Dracula. *shudder*

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Yeah there really hasn't been a movie based on a game that ended up being any good... although Street Fighter was good for a laugh and most of the parts were well-cast (folks take that movie seriously for some reason...). But yah can't think of a good one. The best so far is probably Silent Hill, but it's nevertheless quite unsatisfying as well.

      Well, a good one's gotta come out sooner or later. If Goldeneye and Riddick can be the exceptions to the games-based-on-movies-suck rule, then maybe we'll eventually see something go the other way around.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    2. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Silent Hill was good and even Resident Evil can be considered good.

      Actually Mortal Kombat wasn't that bad either, I wonder why you didn't list one single Uwe Boll movie.

    3. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by ArchdukeChocula · · Score: 1

      >Resident Evil I'm really begining to think I'm the only person on the planet that liked that movie and that the rest of you have all turned into everything-by-Paul-Anderson-sucks zombies... Ironic ain't it!

    4. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      FFVII: Advent Children. Oh wait, that was a big F.U to my intelligence and wallet. ;)

      Better to watch that either muted or in Japanese then you can ignore the painful English dialog and focus on the pretty rendering.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    5. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Heh, my memory must have blocked Uwe Boll to protect itself. ;)

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    6. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Personally, I liked Mortal Kombat. At least the first one wasn't too bad. But yes, most video game movies are really terrible. I think that most of them would only work as an animated movie. Things like the Mario Bros movie are terrible though. Makes me want to burn my eyes out. However, I do remember a saturday morning cartoon based off mario brothers. It wasn't that bad. Get some writers together to put a long more involved story around the characters, and you could have something.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by faloi · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're not the only person. I also sorta liked the original Mortal Kombat. It wasn't going to win any Oscars, but it wasn't a bad action movie.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    8. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by milamber3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both Tomb Raider movies did quite well so you should not be quite so dismissive.

      Tomb Raider 1, World wide gross $274,703,340

      Tomb Raider 2, World wide gross $156,505,388

      Compare those one of the flops you mention:

      Super Mario Bros, Gross (only domestic) $20,915,465

      Or even a movie that a lot of slashdot users love:

      Serenity, World wide gross $38,869,464

    9. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Resident Evil wasn't that bad. It pretty much kept very similar to the actual plot line in the video game (minus the STARS characters).

      Whereas Super Mario and Doom did not resemble anything at all from the video game.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    10. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was basically a rehash of FF7, but that didn't make it better than your average Hollywood movie. (Which actually made it better than most video-game movies, depressingly enough.)

      Rob

    11. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Has any movie based off a video game not been basically a big F.U. to the original material?

      Pokemon? :)

    12. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by maxume · · Score: 1

      Mortal Kombat was good enough that they pushed back the original release and bought better special effects to go with it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... No. It really had nothing to do with FF7. But I think you're talking about FF:Advent Children, in which case, yes, it should seem familiar because it was another story set in that universe.

    14. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      The problem with TSW was that it was a rehash of Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind, while all the Final Fantasy games were rehashes of Laputa: Castle in the Sky. They should've got the people in charge of the Phantasy Star series to make TSW, as they have a lot more experience ripping off Nausicaa.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    15. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even a movie that a lot of slashdot users love:

      Serenity, World wide gross $38,869,464
      Noone ever said we had good taste.
    16. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

      Silent Hill wasn't a horrible F.U. It was more of a "screw off".

    17. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by servognome · · Score: 1

      Has any movie based off a video game not been basically a big F.U. to the original material?
      Wing Commander... you should really see it *evil grin*
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    18. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      100% pure lowest common denominator. Now that is the way to judge quality.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    19. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I know what I'm talking about, and I'm talking about FF: TSW. Aside from the whole "hunt the eight wumpuses" thing (which came from FF4) and different characters, the basic plot was identical to FF7's; aliens originating from a giant crater threaten to kill everyone, heavyhanded superpower (representing science) tries to save everyone and fails, the lifeforce of the planet (representing nature) with the help of a few self-sacrificing heroes comes in and saves everyone.

      Besides, what the hell does the name "Final Fantasy" signify, anyway? Until FFX-2, none of the FF games were in the same universe or even connected in any meaningful way outside of the broadest themes, themes which FF: TSW did no worse at interpreting than any of the games.

      Rob

    20. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      To each their own taste... but I'd post as an AC if I mentioned any of those movies being good, too.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    21. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Silent Hill was well received by the fanbase, it was nowhere near the video game, but still good.

    22. Re:Video Game Movies.... ulg by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      You're right, the pokemon movie was unbearable, just like the game and the tv show.

  4. TV by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

    It sounds like making shows for TV is a hell unto itself. Is there some strange doublestandard for cartoons that assumes they're for children which isn't applied to regular programming?

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    1. Re:TV by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Yes. In America, cartoons are assumed to be for children, even when they obviously aren't (South Park, Simpsons, Family Guy, Futurama, a lot of foreign animated films and TV shows).

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  5. Just get it over with by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Be disappointed now, it'll make it easier later. Console yourselves with the original Castlevainia which I hear can now be downloaded on the Wii.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Just get it over with by Osty · · Score: 1

      Be disappointed now, it'll make it easier later. Console yourselves with the original Castlevainia which I hear can now be downloaded on the Wii.

      Or Castlevania IV, which is also available on WiiVC. Or even better, Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, available now on Xbox 360 XBLA. The earlier Castlevanias are fun, mindless action games, but I really much prefer the Metroidvania style of play.

  6. Could be good... by ArchdukeChocula · · Score: 1

    But please don't make it all CGI. Castlevania is a classic series and it needs a classic hand drawn look, like the original Vampire Hunter D had.

    1. Re:Could be good... by CdrGlork · · Score: 1

      I agree. Though I don't think CGI would be a horrible idea, hand-drawn would definitely be better.

    2. Re:Could be good... by ArchdukeChocula · · Score: 1

      Some shows like Boondocks use a lot of computer animation and look amazing but more often then not CGI just turns into a pricey mess, like the recent TMNT movie for example.

    3. Re:Could be good... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Agree with you on Vampire Hunter D. ANd the above poster who enjoys Resident Evil, I think it warranted enough of a following that sequels were even done (enjoy each one when they're on reruns here, maybe because of Milla?), so you're obviously not alone.

      I am a fan of the incredible animated clips in some of these games. Even though I don't play them, I was wishing somebody would put them together so I know what the ending would be, just like back in the Quake Done Quick days.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  7. Excellent by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This sounds promising. I also have reliable insider information that Uwe Boll is to direct the movie.

    1. Re:Excellent by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I can't decide whether he is the worst director of all time or a genius, having a bit of fun with his subject matter and audience. That says something.

      I actually find myself looking forward to the "Postal" movie, not just because I was a huge fan of the game franchise, but also to see what Uwe will do with it. From the preview stuff I've seen, it looks totally tongue-in-cheek (which is PERFECT for the Postal franchise).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Excellent by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      He's the worst director of all time.

      I don't hate Uwe personally, but I have no faith in his directing ability either. I also enjoyed the Postal games and I'd love to see Postal done in the classical cheesy B-movie style with crappy effects and lame one-lines, but my prediction is that Postal will suck as hard as anything else he's made. It won't be "so bad it's good", it won't be parodying its genre or itself, it would just plain suck.

      Still, I don't have a crystal ball so maybe Postal will be Uwe's Schindler's List, who knows.

    3. Re:Excellent by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of Something Awful (perhaps because you're part of one of those "oppressed groups" that is regularly made fun of there?). Though I do agree that there is getting to be more of a fratboy atmosphere around the place now that it's gotten more popular and more people who don't get the joke (like yourself, but with the opposite attitudes towards elitism) have joined the forums. I also don't see where you got the idea that Lowtax was seriously trying to fight. Everyone including him thought that the whole thing was a joke; the only person that didn't was, apparently, Uwe Boll.

      Anyway, I don't see why a hack like Uwe Boll deserves sympathy. He unapologetically creates terrible movies that shit all over their source material, and he gets quite a bit of money to do it.

      Rob

    4. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and he gets quite a bit of money to do it. If you had read the first paragraph of his Wikipedia article you would have found out he funds his movies with his own production company.

      >I think you missed the point of Something Awful
      No. I just don't need my name attached to a joke I make, there are too many factors that would limit myself and would give other users bias before they read my joke.
      (I quoted in a non-slashdot style as another hint)
  8. Count me out by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I refuse to watch any videogame movie that isn't directed by Uwe Boll.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Count me out by Tz-Auber · · Score: 1

      "You're a funny man, Sully, I like you. That's why I'm going to kill you last."

  9. Sounds Promising... by RamonetB · · Score: 1

    ...to be as bad as any other video game movie. Is there some international conspiracy that prevents anyone from doing this right?

    At least they haven't touched Zelda... yet.

    --
    For castles made of sand must eventually return to the sea.
  10. Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Put a bullet in this franchise - please.

    For months we'd had a string of press releases on SlashDot about Castlevania handheld games, revivals, "as a classic game", etc. (http://slashdot.org/search.pl?query=castlevania) However, a movie announcement now, 20 years after the hum-hum Castlevania franchise first limped through a couple of sequels on the earliest Nintendo systems, is about as good as the timing was on Crocodile Dundee III (15 years or so after the 80's).

    1. Re:Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure I understand your complaint -- Slashdot gets about one story a month that mentions Castlevania in some way or another, frequently just as an aside to the main subject, and that's "a string of press releases"? Crazy. I don't know if I'd say the "franchise" "limped" through a couple of sequels, either, considering that it's still going quite strong. The CV games on the GBA & DS are among the best platformers on the systems. Few people will deny that Symphony of the Night is one of the greatest platformers ever made, and that came out well after the early Nintendo systems were dead. I don't think that anybody but you wants to end the series.

      By the way, you might want to look up the definition for the word "franchise"; I don't think it means what you think it means. Check "press release", while you're at it.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Few people will deny that Symphony of the Night is one of the greatest platformers ever made
      True, it's very good -- but I'd pick Castlevania Bloodlines as the best title of the series.
    3. Re:Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't have a complaint. He's a troll.

    4. Re:Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by Osty · · Score: 1

      True, it's very good -- but I'd pick Castlevania Bloodlines as the best title of the series.

      The Genesis game that had no Belmont in it at all? Are you sure you're not thinking of Dracula X: Rondo of Blood instead? That being the Japan-only prequel to Symphony of the Night, and the last (and supposedly best) of the non-Metroidvania Castlevanias. It's also being re-released on PSP this summer, in case you never got a chance to play it.

      BTW, if you really did mean Bloodlines, Portrait of Ruin (the latest DS game) is a continuation of that story line. The gameplay style is SOTN/Metroidvania rather than action/platformer, though.

    5. Re:Put a bullet in this franchise - please. by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you're not thinking of Dracula X: Rondo of Blood instead? That being the Japan-only prequel to Symphony of the Night, and the last (and supposedly best) of the non-Metroidvania Castlevanias.
      Actually, Rondo of Blood (PCE) came in 93; Bloodlines (Genesis) in 94; and Akumajo Dracula XX (SNES) in 96. But since XX is a (heavily changed) remake of Rondo, I'd say Bloodlines is the last "true" Castlevania.

      I haven't played Rondo, but, as I recall, Bloodlines was much more fun than SotN.
  11. Warren Ellis by Cy+Sperling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I couldn't care less about Castlevania; but Warren Ellis is, hands down, required reading. No self respecting Slashdot reader should pass up reading Transmetropolitan. It is truly fantastic futurist fiction, and damn funny to boot. Spider Jerusalem is my hero.

    1. Re:Warren Ellis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, THANK YOU for properly using the phrase, "couldn't care less."

      The "could care less" variation is so much more common these days, I have to wonder if people actually pay any attention to what they're saying.

    2. Re:Warren Ellis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't care less about Warren Ellis, but Castlevania III is, hands down, required playing. No self respecting gamer would pass up playing Castlevania III. It is truly fantastic platforming, and damn impressive for the NES. Trevor Belmont is my hero.

      Now will I get modded "Interesting" ?

  12. What is a man? by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1

    A miserable little pile of secrets! But enough talk. Have at you!

    1. Re:What is a man? by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      You steal men's souls, and make them your slaves!

    2. Re:What is a man? by MasterGwaha · · Score: 0

      tell me... what were lisa's last words?

  13. Advent Are-you-fucking-kidding-me by CelticWhisper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...And the complete lack of a plot?

    Advent Children was among the worst movies of the year, and you are spot-on in your recommendation to watch it muted. With all due respect, however, your suggestion of switching to Japanese dialogue is, in this geek's eyes, a shade misguided as watching in Japanese solves nothing--the problems run deeper than voice-overs or language itself. I saw both the English and Japanese versions, having fallen prey to fans of the film telling me "it's better in Japanese, trust me, see it that way." So I gave it a whirl, figuring at least the worst that could happen is I'd lose another 90 minutes of my life.

    Fool me once (The Grudge/Ju-On), shame on you. Fool me twice, just shoot me in the head.

    Now, before you revoke my geek badge, I have nothing against Japanese culture or media, my J-console-game collection is extensive, and I watch anime from time to time (albeit not as much as I used to, but still a fair amount--recently it's been Ergo Proxy, which is amazing and available in 720p as icing on the cake). However, no amount of appreciation for Japanese pop culture could salvage this frelling pile of dren.

    It was nothing either way but 90 minutes of pandering pointlessness with a slick CG shine.

    • The heroes were all superhuman and I never once felt the slightest hint of suspense. Is it asking too much to have these characters whom we have come to know and (presumably) love overcome some real adversity and demonstrate some strength of character, whether it be in intelligence, creativity, quick thinking, resourcefulness, or something other than flying through the air in slow motion and smiling/winking at the camera?
    • The writers failed to make me care about Kadaj, Loz, and Yazoo's motives, due in part to making them so implausibly, unrealistically man-gorgeous that I was completely unable to take them seriously as antagonists (I know, I know, it's a Japanese cultural thing and it's all over games/anime/manga, but all I can say is at least people know not to fuck with Dr. Doom or Emperor Palpatine), and also in part to the jarring (lack of) introduction we were given to these characters. It's one thing to throw the audience right in the middle of an action scene with the hero facing an unknown villain and then follow the hero as he finds out about who they are, what they want, etc. The way it was done here, though, had all the characters acting as though they had some existing knowledge of the villains and it made me feel as though I'd missed some crucial part of the plot.
    • The Geostigma/SSS was poorly explained almost to the point of passing lip-service instantly forgotten at the onset of the next fight scene. Also, its apparent cure was similarly contrived and forced, feeling like yet another way to stuff in a fan-pleaser.
    • Speaking of fight scenes, some of the camera motion threatened to forcefully reintroduce me to my lunch. The spiral down the side of Orthanc in Fellowship was bad enough, but at least it was over in a couple seconds...almost a full half-hour of it in FF7AC's final motorcycle-chase/action/fight sequence was just unforgivable.

    Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, for as panned and reviled as it is by the fanboys, is at least a respectable exercise in filmmaking even if it has few ties to its namesake game series. This stems from the film taking the time to properly introduce and develop characters, make the audience feel for them, make them seem human, and then string events together in a cohesive, meaningful fashion to form that elusive animal called a "plot." Poor game adaptation, but a decent film with a moderately engaging plot, some funny moments, and characters that seem far more real personality-wise than the planks of wood in AC. I know the character models bungee-jump in the Uncanny Valley, but at least they act, talk, and sound real. Far better than the overabundance of brooding stares and unconvincing overly-emotionally-charged conflict of AC.

    AC, on the other hand, is a "thank-you" to FF7 fans and a "fuck you" to anyone else interested in seeing an enjoyable movie.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Advent Are-you-fucking-kidding-me by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Spot on with what you said. Like I said. A big F.U. to my intelligence.

      "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, for as panned and reviled as it is by the fanboys, is at least a respectable exercise in filmmaking even if it has few ties to its namesake game series. This stems from the film taking the time to properly introduce and develop characters, make the audience feel for them, make them seem human, and then string events together in a cohesive, meaningful fashion to form that elusive animal called a "plot.""

      FF:TSW = Attempt at a real film. Honestly, if they had dropped the FF from the name it would've been better recieved by fans. Critics had a hard time getting beyond the stiff "acting" and visuals. The themes match with the series, but fans are too busy debating Sephiroth vs. Kefka to think about anything remotely thematic.

      FF:AC = Fan service orgy. 'nuff said. Also extortion by making the PSP version $5 more. I only suggested watching in Japanese with English subs because watching it purely in English and no subs does not explain the plot very well at all the first time through. Maybe it was second dose of the movie a month later that helped make some sense of the trainwreck, but you shouldn't need a second watching of something like this to make sense of it. I do not appreciate being thrust into a plot that takes place years after a well-known story and expects me to automatically know what has been going on between then and now without any real attempt by the story writers to explain what the hell has happened, even summarily. For some reason without them introducing the trio of bad guys, that I was missing a manual or some document explaining who the hell they were.

      Honestly, they should have kept the movie to it's original length (30 - 60 minutes?) and cut out a lot of the crap and fan service (why he hell did we need every player-character to show up in the last 5 minutes of the final battle scene.)

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    2. Re:Advent Are-you-fucking-kidding-me by Tofystedeth · · Score: 1

      I could not agree with you guys more. I never cared enough for FFVII to even finish the game on any of many attempts to placate my friends by doing so. Another friend who is convinced that FFVII is about the best game ever and I watched AC and we both came away from it with "pretty" being about the positive thing we could say about it. I was almost completely lost having seen only fragmentary bits of the plot past the second disc, and he, who'd beaten several times was none too impressed either. I wish SquareEnix would sell their artistic services to other studios and leave the movie writing to someone else. They might make some money back off of TSW finally.

      --
      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
  14. The help you need. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Slashdot gets about one story a month that mentions Castlevania in some way or another, frequently just as an aside to the main subject, and that's "a string of press releases"?


    Yes. In fact, if SlashDot is reliably posting something about Castlevania about once a month, that's a "well-timed and effective string of press releases". In the marketing world, you'd call it "sustaining awareness, if not interest in the 'Castlevania' brand name". (I'd ask you to look up AIDA but I doubt it would help.)

    Here are the definitions of the words you had trouble understanding in my original post.

    Franchise:
    http://www.investorwords.com/2078/franchise.html
    See how this applies to the movie?

    Press Release:
    http://www.1stworldlibrary.org/Glossary.html#p
    See how this applies to the regular SlashDot postings?

    Feel free to ask if you need more help with your cognitive processes...

    1. Re:The help you need. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Franchise:
      http://www.investorwords.com/2078/franchise.html [investorwords.com]
      See how this applies to the movie?


      I can see how you could consider Castlevania to be a product. If you shoehorn it a bit, you could probably also consider the production of a movie to mean they've entered into a "continuing contractual relationship with other businesses". However, I doubt the movie studio is operating "under the franchisor's trade name" in exchange for a fee.

      Every other entry than the movie in the series is right out, considering that, last I checked, they're not farming production of them out to other companies.

      Press Release:
      http://www.1stworldlibrary.org/Glossary.html#p [1stworldlibrary.org]
      See how this applies to the regular SlashDot postings?


      Did Konami issue all of those articles themselves? No? I'm afraid I don't see.

      Feel free to ask if you need more help with your cognitive processes...

      Feel free to let me know if you want to argue based on the matters at hand rather than nitpicks.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  15. Dracula's Ring by Pengunea · · Score: 1

    Sooooo, how do you think they'll handle the collection of Dracula's "Ring"? That could seriously bump up the maturity rating alone.

    I do look forward to when it comes out. When I go out in the evening for pleasure I'll get to say "What a horrible night to see a movie!".

    --
    Starkle, starkle, little twink.
    1. Re:Dracula's Ring by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I haven't played a Castlevania game since the NES days (with the exception of Symphony of the Night), so I don't get this one.
      I hate to ask, but could you explain the joke?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Dracula's Ring by Pengunea · · Score: 1

      The "ring" was originally, well balls. It was re-named in the North American release to "ring" but the image was never changed so you could still tell what it was. Especially considering all the other items like the heart and rib were body parts.

      As nasty as carrying around the heart of a vampire is, there was something far worse you were toting around with you.

      --
      Starkle, starkle, little twink.
  16. Spoiler: Plot summary! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    A young man, armed only with a whip, travels to Dracula's castle to destroy Dracula.

    (I love these games. But... they are going to have to embelish a little...)

    1. Re:Spoiler: Plot summary! by servognome · · Score: 1

      A young man, armed only with a whip, travels to Dracula's castle to destroy Dracula.
      (I love these games. But... they are going to have to embelish a little...)
      Indiana Jones - a young man armed with a whip goes looking for ancient treasure.... oh he hates snakes - is that what you mean by embelishment?
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  17. Hope it isn't too much like the game by bcattwoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it is anything like my copy of the game for the original NES, the movie will freeze up just as he gets to the Grim Reaper and you will be forced to either sit through the whole movie once more hoping it won't happen again or leave in disgust.

    1. Re:Hope it isn't too much like the game by Tofystedeth · · Score: 1

      Not to mention if you hop a little bit going down the stairs at the theater, the world beneath isn't reloaded and you die.

      --
      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
  18. Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust by joystickgenie · · Score: 1

    Really if you want a Castlevania movie and like symphony of the night I would say pick up Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust. D and Alucard are so ridiculously close to each other in actions and mannerisms I really felt like bloodlust was just Castlevania with a different name.

  19. Get this through you head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason why there's a feature on the disc that gives you a synopsis of the story from the game. There's a reason why it reference to events from the game that you never got a glimpse of in the movie. AC was an epilogue to FFVII; it's not a stand alone movie and was never meant to be one. It's no more "pointless" than you sitting in for the last 90 mins of ROTK when you haven't seen the first 2 and a half of the LOTR trilogy.

  20. Re:Give it up Crazy IGA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Castlevania ill needs a savior such as you!

  21. It's instinct by fatalfury · · Score: 1

    Immediately upon reading this post, I hit Ctrl-F to search for "Uwe Boll." Why does that feel like a Freudian tell of some sort?

  22. To summarize the movie by phorm · · Score: 1

    Sad children
    Fight scene
    Particle effects
    Explosions
    Fight scene
    Big monsters
    Fight scene
    Lots of special moves etc
    Motorcycle
    Fight Scene

    Seriously. I'm a big fan of the FF series (got all of them except the GB ones... but including FF2/NES), but I was extremely disappointed with FF-AC. Plot-wise, I think that even "Spirits Within" was a little better. How about a real non-mangled movie-adaptation of one of the original RPG's... without plot-mangling or fanboy-precedence to large anime boobies and fight-scenes? FFVI had a wonderful plot. I'm replaying FFX with a friend and frankly the voice-acting (for most characters) and the believability of the characters is definitely movie-worthy (the whole "who's undead" thing was a fun twist). Yes, you could definately cut out some of the extraneous crap and the extra Seymour battles, but a lot of the rest would be good cinema material.

    Much better than a cellphone with final-fantasy ringtones, and a few cheap summon effects that were really no better than in the games themselves...