Slashdot Mirror


New "Terminator" Trilogy Planned

Ant writes "Dark Horizons reports after much talk and posturing over the future of "The Terminator" franchise/series in recent years, something surprising has happened: The Halcyon Company has acquired the franchise rights to the popular movie series and intends to make a new trilogy that would anchor their movie company..."

67 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another dead horse to beat.

    1. Re:Great by Doc+Lazarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. The Hollywood trend is to secure money by rehashing proven hits of the past. This company could do something unique with the Terminator movies. But then again, they could also do something completely unique and possibly create a new franchise as well.

    2. Re:Great by AdamThor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hollywood is totally about draining every last cent from anything that can be seen to have any potential. They won't stop. Ever. Until all love for the franchise is dead.

      That being said, the conception of the terminator universe is still fertile, I think. Creative and productive people with a clear vision unfettered by corporate BS could probably do something pretty cool with the property. We've seen, as with LotR, if a company is staking it's existence on a property they can potentially realize that they need to work on making it good rather than making it profitable.

      That being said, mention of a TV series does not give me much hope. =(

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    3. Re:Great by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Hollywood trend is to secure money by rehashing proven hits of the past
      The trend of any business is to make the most of your successful products. After all, you never know when you'll need the money, your next product might bomb and cost you millions.

      I don't see how film franchises are any worse than TV shows that drag on for years and years, or comics that go on for decades. Just because a film uses old characters and an old premise doesn't mean it can't be entertaining.
    4. Re:Great by AdamThor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hollywood is totally about draining every last cent from anything that can be seen to have any potential. They won't stop. Ever. Until all love for the franchise is dead.

      Separate thought here. I wonder if it would prove fruitful to build a mental model of cultural properties something like this:

      Audience Adoration = Potential Energy
      Cash = Kinetic Energy

      One can be converted to the other - with losses. But if you want to increase one without decreasing the other you need to add work to the system. Hmmm, maybe that doesn't provide any useful insight.

      It doesn't seem wise, to me, to convert all of your Audience Adoration into Cash, EVERY TIME, and leave only the husks of entertainment ideas in your wake. Can we build an accessable mental model that explains why Hollywood types shouldn't convert every well regarded property into easy cash?

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    5. Re:Great by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another dead horse to beat.
      well, you think it's dead, and you pointedly turn your back on it and clasp your love interest in a long and passionate kiss that gives it just enough time to rear up on its hind legs and then start galloping toward you out of the flaming wreckage with its beady red eyes all aglow. Terminator 4: OMG PONIES
    6. Re:Great by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see how film franchises are any worse than TV shows that drag on for years and years, or comics that go on for decades. Just because a film uses old characters and an old premise doesn't mean it can't be entertaining. I agree. Some great films have been sequels. On the other hand TV shows that drag on for years and years (hell, many get tired after only a season or two) are indeed just as bad as many sequels. Think of how many TV shows are ruined as they run on: the characters become caricatures of their original selves, and everything has to become "more" and "better" season after season till things are bordering on the truly absurd. The same is often true for movies -- just consider the previews for the new Die Hard movie. Fresh ideas an fresh starts have a lot to offer.
    7. Re:Great by flappinbooger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neither creator James Cameron or original star Arnold Schwarzenegger will be involved in the project, which picks up with John Connor in his 30s leading what's left of the human race against the machines.


      Nah, man, the above is what will make this good. There's been what, 2 minutes, shown of this timeframe of the universe? That whole part of the terminator universe is the basis for all of the movies, yet it is largely left to our imagination. They are going to explore that. No dead horse. They're, uhh, beating a mostly new horse...
      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    8. Re:Great by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, glad they didn't do that to Star Trek...

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    9. Re:Great by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another dead horse to beat.

      It's not dead if we go back in time. Also, I have the exact date the foal was conceived right here, I suggest we go back and beat his mother this time before he's born.

    10. Re:Great by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the plus side, the Terminator franchise wrapped itself up pretty cleanly with T2, so if you don't like the new movies you can just ignore them. It's not like, say, the X-Men movie series, in which the first two movies set left a lot of plot threads unresolved only to be completely shit on with the third movie.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    11. Re:Great by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, no, T2 did leave something, who anyone with a sense of logic would have picked on. Effectively a type of Grandfather Paradox. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_paradox

      In Terminator 1, a Robot was sent back in time, to kill Sarah Connor, preventing the birth of John Connor, leader of the resistance. The resistance sent a human back into time as well, who then impregnated Sarah, to create John Connor. Although the terminator is nearly destroyed, at the end of the film, Judgement day still was to exist. A paradox was formed in the sense that, Johns father is a person who only met Sarah because of judgement day, interesting, a circular action, technically should not be possible (imagine recursion)

      In Terminator 2. supposedly all traces of the terminators were destroyed, and Judgement day was averted. But, if Judgement day was averted, then those terminators would have no longer existed and they would not have come back in time. Another paradox, or did the new universe that got formed at that instant, simply shift its path?

      This is why there was a T3.

      --
      Have a nice day!
  2. Premonition. by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just had this awful premonition of a new model of Terminator...

    ...It can't be bargained with, can't be reasoned with, and it absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead...

    "Meesa be back!"

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Premonition. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know I'd go back in time prevent that movie from ever being made!

    2. Re:Premonition. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Meesa be back!"
      I always thought I was too old to be spooked by such a simple thing as the written word but you sir have guaranteed I'll be having nightmares tonight. {shudder}
      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    3. Re:Premonition. by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      John Connor shot first!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Premonition. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it was made in the USA, it could become president.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Worth going back in time to prevent: by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Terminator: The Animated Series.

    1. Re:Worth going back in time to prevent: by ettlz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, fuck it: Terminator: The Musical.

  4. To be fair by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Funny

    He did say 'I'll be back'.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  5. OMG is the George Lucas Effect! by Soiden · · Score: 5, Funny

    Terminator IV: A new John Connor Terminator V: The Robots Strike Back Terminator VI: The Return of the Terminator

    --
    Minti: What's that huge shuriken in your back?! Kin: It's the instrument of my victory.
    1. Re:OMG is the George Lucas Effect! by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know this is a joke, but still I'd bet a George Lucas style Terminator would turn out pretty awesome. The francise is coming off of a low note, ie T3, and with nothing but the future war setting left, it would look pretty sweet. All the battle sequences from episode II and III were rather spectacular in my opinion, and a future war Terminator movie done in the same style might be the kind of new direction the francise needs. It's not like there needs to be much character story, everyone's pretty much setup in their relations to the main players, and its not as if a political side story would appear in the middle an extinction war. So, that means, no romance plot, no starchy politics, and a freaking pre-destined on-the-rails plotline (thanks a lot T3.) So what's left to make the movie? SFX, explosions, creative war machines, more explosions, fancy CGI/models, and zetaflops worth of more explosions! A George Lucas style Terminator 4 would rock!

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:OMG is the George Lucas Effect! by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slashdot V: A new hope
      Slashdot VI: Death of the AC

      We were all thinking it... I'm just saying it ;)

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
  6. Enough by escay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enough with the trilogies already. why can't we have a single good movie and just let that be?

    1. Re:Enough by solios · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because trilogies make more money, duh.

      Hollywood only cares about quality product to the extent that they need the occasional quality product in order to keep the cash pouring in.

    2. Re:Enough by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      Enough with the trilogies already. why can't we have a single good movie and just let that be?
      Why? What was wrong with Highlander II and Highlander III? Errr, OK, bad example. Matrix II and Matrix III?? Hmmm. Alien3 and Alien Resurection??? OK, I give up.
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Enough by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Hollywood only cares about quality product to the extent that they need the occasional quality product in order to keep the cash pouring in.

      Even further, Hollywood is compelled to continue making sequels until they are so bad they stop making money. It is the only way to insure they have extracted all the money possible from a franchise.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Enough by radarsat1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Books are the one thing I have not seen the phenomenon in however. The reason may be that there is already so much variety, and that the major book readers don't purchase such worthless media.


      Hm.. I'm sorry, maybe it's because I just rolled out of bed and I'm a bit tired, but I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic or not... *books* don't have trilogies??? When was the last time you went to a book store my friend?
    5. Re:Enough by Zoxed · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Why? What was wrong with Highlander II and Highlander III? Errr, OK, bad example. Matrix II and Matrix III?? Hmmm. Alien3 and Alien Resurection??? OK, I give up.

      Well, IMHO, Star Wars IV was the best in that series :-)

    6. Re:Enough by Floritard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you seen the director's cut? I always feel I have to recommend this to anyone who thinks Fincher dropped the ball on Alien 3. There is an entire religious subplot that was lifted from the movie and its omission basically kills the soul of the project. One of the prisoners assigns an almost mystical quality to the alien which I think adds another layer to what was pretty much just a monster movie. It has an atmosphere that reminds me of a Dark Horse comic or something out of Heavy Metal. OTOH, Alien Resurrection does just piss all over the face of the series.

    7. Re:Enough by bazorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There should have been only one.

  7. What I really want by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't more Terminator but another Alien movie based on the book that should have been Alien 3 i.e. Alien Earth Hive. That would seriously kick ass.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  8. That would anchor their company... by solios · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... in POO.

    After repeated viewings, I'm of the opinion that Cameron's what makes the franchise. We didn't need a third movie (what the hell was up with that, anyway?) - much like we didn't need a Highlander 2 (or 3, etc).

    If they're good, that's one thing - but Terminator without Cameron is like, say... The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen without Allen Moore. Or Watchmen if it were written by Rob Liefeld.

    The only upcoming "sequel" sci-fi I'm looking forward to is Babylon 5 : The Lost Tales. It's more B5, and most importantly, it's still under the control of Straczynski.

    I trust in creators, not franchises.

    1. Re:That would anchor their company... by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

      And #4 will be from the team that wrote that piece of shit #3. I think I'd rather watch a shot-by-shot remake of the original from Gus Van Sant with Anne Heche as Sarah Conner, Vince Vaughn as Kyle Reese, and William H. Macy as the terminator.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  9. Plot for Terminator 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All hope for humankind is almost lost. John Connor is on the ropes, he and his band of rebels have almost been completely eliminated by the latest rev of the Terminator line, the T666. However, like a bolt from the heavens, the real saviour of the human race emerges. It is non other than Darl McBride. It turns out that SkyNet has at least 1024 instances of SCO owned IP in it's source code. Darl is able to tie SkyNet up in litigation for years, allowing Connor to regroup ....

  10. Re:Who needs Arnold? by Sqweegee · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTA:

    "Neither creator James Cameron or original star Arnold Schwarzenegger will be involved in the project, which picks up with John Connor in his 30s leading what's left of the human race against the machines."

  11. T4 by niceone · · Score: 2, Funny

    T4: The return of the return of the machines.
    T5: The return of the return of the return of the machines.
    T6: The return of the return of the return of the return of the machines.

    I could work in Hollywood.

    1. Re:T4 by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      T7: Stack overflow.

  12. Re:Will it involve Arnold? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Which bit of "Neither creator James Cameron or original star Arnold Schwarzenegger will be involved in the project" are you struggling with?

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  13. Problem by Bob54321 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anchors drag things down, or at least keep them where they are. I think they need a better analogy. Perhaps something to do with cars...

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  14. Re:Who needs Arnold? by eli+pabst · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I agree. As much as I enjoyed the original Terminator movies, the background plot of John Connor always seemed more interesting to me and I always felt a bit disappointed that it wasn't developed further. The part in T1 when Michael Biehn's character (Reese) falls asleep under the bridge and has a flashback dream was an incredibly cool sequence.

  15. It must be said... by Grashnak · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll be back, and back, and back.

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  16. It's a fair cop.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Funny

    It might be the "original," but that "or" is also deceptively complex.

  17. Re:Who needs Arnold? by Intron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Neither creator James Cameron or original star Arnold Schwarzenegger will be involved in the project"

    I can predict the future on this one without time travel.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  18. I hope they make it a love story chick flick by gelfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With vaguely homoerotic overtones, like Spiderman. Because Hollywood hasn't turned everything into shit just yet.

    But to be fair, T-3 was pretty close to that. All that they need to do is fill the cast with whatever interchangeable hunks and chicks are in whatever is hot on the WB at that time.

    Oh yeah and did I mention that Sarah Conners has to be black?

  19. Spoilers by p4rri11iz3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    Terminator IV: A New Hope (more of a "hacker movie" like Swordfish) As human resistance slowly fails, it falls upon hackers to discover a decription code for the robots programming which happens to be: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 Rebels win the day. Terminator V: Sony sues back (a lawyer movie) The robots sue the rebels of IP infringment. A climactic point is reached when John Connor is on the stand. The defense displays pictures of various robots (1 at a time) and asks the question, "Are these the motherf*ckers?" to which John angrily screams "YES!" Terminator VI: Return of the Sequels ...

    --
    "Now I'm seriously serious!" - Serious Sam
  20. Dark Horse Terminator Comics were good by gtmaneki · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be good if they mined the old Terminator comics put out by Dark Horse. They were set in the future, following the rag-tag human resistance as they tried to survive and fight back, dealing with the creeping paranoia that some of their number are secretly Terminators out to destroy them from within. I'd appreciate bringing the series back to its creepier roots.

  21. Where is the new SciFi? by bhima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fuck, this is dreary. Even if it isn't that good can we have some new Sci-Fi?

    Something that isn't a "franchise". Some that is not Star Wars? Or Star Trek

    Or whatever it is Hollywood has already made dozens of movies of?

    Fuck ANY thing without a number at the end!

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Where is the new SciFi? by mblase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if it isn't that good can we have some new Sci-Fi? Something that isn't a "franchise".

      We have lots. "The Last Mimzy", most recently. "Pan's Labyrinth" was a terrific fantasy work, too, and "Stardust" is on the way in August.

      The problem is that unless it's an action blockbuster, sci-fi and fantasy are tough sells -- partly because they have a special effects budget, but mostly because they have a small audience. My wife has a hard time enjoying any story that isn't rooted in the reality she lives every day, and most moviegoers are of the same mind. (That's a big part of why Spider-Man is always a bigger seller than the Fantastic Four.)

      The best way to sell sci-fi and fantasy in Hollywood is to make it a mega-summer blockbuster, and the best kind of blockbuster is one that Hollywood KNOWS will sell tickets, and that means sequels to previous hits.

      It's not as if literature is that much different. Many successful fantasy and sci-fi authors operate franchises of their own -- J.K. Rowling, George R.R. Martin, Jim Butcher, Terry Pratchett, and Tolkien Jr. and Herbert Jr. all spring immediately to mind.

      Book readers and moviegoers always SAY they want something new, but what they really want most of the time is something old.

  22. Trilogies by jacobw · · Score: 4, Funny

    The advantage of a well-done trilogy is that the first film sets up certain expectations regarding characters and plot. The second film then plays with those expectations in a surprising and suspenseful way. And when the third film wraps everything up, you feel a satisfaction that can only come from having lived with the characters in your imagination for several years.

  23. Trilogies II: Trilogier by jacobw · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...or at least, that's what I used to think. Then I found out that A TRILOGY KILLED MY FATHER--and it's COMING AFTER ME NEXT!!!!!

  24. Trilogies III: Trilectric Boogoloo by jacobw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, that was close. The trilogy that killed my father almost killed me, but fortunately, I was saved by a bunch of fuzzy, cute merchandising opportunities that had absolutely nothing to do with the tone or content of my first two posts. Whew!

  25. What a stupid idea by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I love the first two. They're impressive, action-packed, and scary. I never even bothered to see the third one because it looked like it was going to suck right out of the gate. Turns out I was right.

    The problem with T3 and any future project is that they're doing it for the bucks, not because there's any story worth telling. When it's about the money, the entire project will be permeated with a workman-like attitude. "Hey, don't complain, you're getting paid." "It doesn't have to get good, it just has to be finished." "Why invest any of myself in this? Nobody cares anyway."

    So anything the studios put out will suck, suck, suck. But there's a theoretical question, is there anything left to explore in the Terminator universe? To that I would have to say yes: the machine war. They already did time travel in the first two movies. Doing it again in the third was a stupid and hackneyed idea. So, what stories are there to tell in the future? This guy has some ideas.

    http://www.goingfaster.com/term2029/contents.html

    His birth of skynet story here is suitably terrifying and well-written. You could just imagine what something like this would look like on film.

    http://www.goingfaster.com/term2029/skynet.html

    Any future Terminator storyline should discard T3, start with a new numbering scheme, and go with all new characters. The Machine War. The rise of the human resistence. The eventual defeat of Skynet. Not even a hint of time travel until the end of the third movie where John Connor leads the assault on the Skynet time portal. Use some CGI to make a new actor's face look like Kyle Reese from the first film. They enter the portal room. The instruments say that something has already gone back. Kyle strips down and goes through the portal. Connor orders the device reset for another transfer. "Wait, we're still here, aren't we? Didn't Kyle save you?" "Yeah, but Skynet sent two back. Prep the T800 we captured." Why only send one each time? Why not send more soldiers? They have the facility, they could send back an army. "Because only four were ever sent back in time, one human, three terminators. It worked out well enough for us then, I see no reason to risk changing things now."

    Bah. The new Terminators are going to suck shit through a straw.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  26. Suggested Titles by Migraineman · · Score: 2, Funny


    Okay, so we've already got -
    - The Terminator
    - Terminator 2: Judgement Day
    - Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines

    Followed by -
    - Terminator 4: Inescapable Truth
    - Terminator 5: ?????
    - Terminator 6: Profit!*


    * The working title for "Terminator 6: Profit!" is "Please, oh please, watch this movie." I can't wait for some asshat to start with the whole "social contract" crap and how we, the good little consumers, have an obligation to go to the theaters and finance whatever garbage they're shoveling this week. Think of the children of the executive producer!

  27. tell it from the point of view of sensenet by damontal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    sensenet becoming self aware is what sets the whole shebang off in the first place right? that's always been the most interesting aspect of the story to me. why not tell the story from the point of view of the AI?

  28. Re:Will it involve Arnold? by AdamThor · · Score: 2, Funny

    WE WAN'T OR!

    I'm struggling with your use of the apostrophe here. What does 'wa not' mean?

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  29. Why T3 Sucked by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

    A public service announcement.

    http://www.goingfaster.com/term2029/t3review.html

    A review of

    T3: Rise of the Machines

    or the alternate title

    "T3: WE REWROTE T2: JUDGMENT DAY AND TRIED TO SLIP IT PAST THE FANS FOR MORE OF THEIR MONEY"

    Déjà vu is a funny feeling you get when you think that you have done or seen something before. Well, when I bought the T3 DVD and watched it for the first time I had a real case of déjà vu. Even though this was the first time that I had ever seen T3:ROTM, I knew that I had seen this movie before. Now, where was it that I had seen T3:ROTM before?

    Hmmmm.

    (insert sound of me snapping my fingers)

    That's right! it was the Summer of 1991 and the movie was called Terminator 2: Judgment Day way back then.

    T3 is a lampoon of T2, and a very bad one at that. From cheesy acting to laughable holes in both logic and plot, T3 fails as anything other than maybe a demo for some well done FX eye candy. The bad news is that it is official, it is canon, and it effectively beheads and neuters the first two movies in one fell swoop at the same time. T3 should be a lesson to all other film-makers of how not to make a movie using a vastly popular franchise. Big money and big star power couldn't save this stinker...

    Let's recap the plot to T3:ROTM. SKYNET's attempt to kill Sarah Connor in 1984 fails. SKYNET then sends back through time an advanced prototype terminator to kill John Connor when he's older. The Resistance manages to send back a reprogrammed Terminator to protect John Connor. A chase ensues with the prototype Terminator pursuing John Connor while the reprogrammed Terminator protects him. A climatic battle between the two Terminators in the end results in the destruction of the prototype as well as the noble, self sacrifice of the guardian Terminator.

    Notice any similarities there between T2 and T3? Sure you did because T3 is just T2 with more eye candy and a lot weaker plot. T3 could easily be considered a rejected script for T2: Judgment Day. At any rate, the abortion that is T3 should never have seen the light of day. There are numerous loop holes in the logic of T3 and several things that just really stood out as dumb. Let's review those now.

    (Dumb)- the advanced prototype Terminator arrives back in modern day LA and immediately grabs a flashy, high dollar sports car then proceeds to drive like a maniac thus attracting all manner of public as well as law enforcement attention. The Terminator then proceeds to drive around and terminate people without any real regard for stealth. Sure, LA is a big, crazy place, but the amount of bosomy blondes in really tight red dress suits driving around at 90mph in a convertible Lexus and randomly capping people at burger stands can't be more than a hand full at any given time. Also, as a police officer, I know that when the officer pulled over the Lexus, he would have called in the make, model, and tag. Other officers would have been en route to back up the officer who stopped the Lexus, especially if it failed to yield to blue lights or he had to chase it a short bit. Once they arrived, or the dead officer failed to call in within two minutes (dispatch would check on his status often, especially on a traffic stop), other officers across the city would be on the look out or in pursuit of the Lexus. At least in T2:JD, the T1000 was smart enough to mimic a police officer, take the patrol unit, and access the LAPD central computer system in its quest to find John Connor.

    (Dumb)- if the T-X can produce weapons out of its body, why does it need a Glock to carry out its mission? When it pulled up to the drive-thru at the burger joint to kill the first victim on its termination list, it would have made more sense if it had simply created a finger spike and run it through the eye socket of the kid at the window, like the T1000 did with the security guard at the insane asylum in T2. Tha

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  30. Terminator never explored the post-nuclear world by xtal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We don't know that much about what skynet did after it took over, how the humans fought, what happened elsewhere in the world.. this is what T3 should have been, but wasn't. There's probably enough there for at least one more movie, but I don't know about three.

    --
    ..don't panic
  31. As long as we're making sequels by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Funny

    K-Pax II: Invasion

    "More humans... please... the first one was... delicious...."

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  32. Re:I'd pay to see... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'd pay to see a 30 seconds flick?

    Then again, when I look at some porn sites...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Hollywood is an investment system by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was an episode of this week in media where someone said something like,

    ~"People think Hollywood is about creativity and artistic expression. It's not - it's actually a very strange investment system. You put some money in, and hopefully, get more money out. An established franchise is a form of hedging."

    However, fear not, movie fans - the tools coming out will allow anyone with talent to produce a film with production values as high as any, and it's getting cheaper all the time. The red camera, increased competition in computer software, more powerful hardware, &c., and not to mention the internet as a distribution mechanism.

    The future is bright for creativity and expression through film; the antithesis of Hollywood.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  34. Plot for Terminator 5 by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 2, Funny
    *** SPOILER WARNING! ***

    Having been granted full ownership of SkyNet by the courts, Darl McBride repurposes it to hunt down and destroy Linux users who have failed to pay their $199 licensing fee. Even though John Connor is a BSD user, he realizes that it is only a matter of time before Darl turns on his kind as well. As an act of desperation, Connor forges an alliance with the remaining T666 units, knowing that he is facing the greatest threat to humanity yet. While the T666 units stage a valiant assault against Darl, it is clear that they are no match for his ever growing power. All appears lost until it is revealed that the assault was just a diversion to allow Connor to strike at Darl's Achilles' heel by getting SCO delisted from the NASDAQ.

  35. I can see it now by PhysicsPhil · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll have the new release, then a remastered release in which the Terminator doesn't fire first.

  36. Re:Who needs Arnold? by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 5, Funny

    [Spoiler alert]
    Episode 4: Total Recall
    After modifying part of skynet, John Connor managed to recall all robots back to HQ where he short-circuited their Sony power unit until they swell and explode. Towards the end the program managed to install itself on a retrotype animal robot.. something called the AIBO

    Episode 5: Kindergarten Cop
    Turns out before the Terminator was sent back in time to help young John, the old John sent another robot called the Eraser to assist toddler John in finding little Miles Bennett Dyson. The SkynetAIBO was also sent back in time and ate all of John's erasers, including the one that smells really nice. SkynetAIBO returns home sick from eating too much erasers.

    Episode 6: The Last Action Hero
    The future world is now finally at peace. Robots are again used as servants and slaves without soul. John refused to lead the nation of United States and settled to govern the state of CA-90210.
    One day he suffers from major headache when a hotel chain heiress Barcelona Hotlin begged him to get her off her impending imprisonment due to excessive velocity transport without authorization clearance. He agreed to pardon her in exchange with sexual favor, which the SkynetAIBO secretly taped and sold all over the Interweb. SkynetAIBO becomes rich and builds a new ROBOTIC EMPIRE. (pitch to the next series of trilogy)

    [/spoiler]

  37. Re:Who needs Arnold? by servognome · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have seen the future, and it's direct to DVD

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  38. Re:Who needs Arnold? by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously, they'll be produced by the Republican Party. So, who will be the new Terminator? McCain? Giuliani? Huckabee? Romney? Maybe Santorum in preparation for '12 or '16?

  39. the wachowskis already did it by rubberbandball · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "which picks up with John Connor in his 30s leading what's left of the human race against the machines." Read: The Matrix.

    --
    oh marmalade.