Slashdot Mirror
Apple Sues Over iGasm Ads
funkeymonkeyman writes "Apple is less than pleased with an interesting new peripheral for the iPod which promises to 'take your appreciation of music to a whole new level.' Legal action has been taken against Ann Summers, the manufacturers of the new device, specifically for the similarity of the iGasm advertisements to the iconic iPod silhouette ads. The CEO of the adult retail chain replied to the threat cheerily, 'Perhaps I can send them an iGasm to put a smile back on their faces.'"
But iCame.
And suddenly she's going to make a shitload of money because of the lawsuit.
Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
Headline should read:
Apple's usual litigation-trigger-happy attitude has netted an incalculable amount of free publicity to Anne Summers.
I can't really see how Apple can claim some sort of copyright over silhouettes. I mean - the original iPod adds seemed very.... reminiscent of the James Bond opening credits sequences from the 70s.
Perhaps Apple is jealous that the Anne Summers' logo also contains an Apple.
There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
Personally, I'm surprised they haven't started suing the iGoatse...which almost makes me wish I had an iPod ;)
Between the falling angel and the rising ape
Have any of you slashgals tried it yet? Does it work, or is it just a gimmick?
Table-ized A.I.
Little pod I see
The screaming, it's so damn loud
Anger or pleasure?
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
What is the worst thing that can happen?
Um, a lifetime of reoccuring horrid flasbacks like one's own personal Clockwork Orange.
Table-ized A.I.
http://adsoftheworld.com/node/10351/play
I'd have to say that the Metallica song whiplash would even make Hilary Clinton smile with this outfit. (turn it up Bill, turn it UP!!!) We might even get lucky, and she'll be so happy that it will keep her out of politics. (one can only wish)
Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
...why the Apple silhouette shakes so much.
You're posting to slashdot. With account name "appleguru". And your link goes to a site about modding video game consoles. Of the millions of people reading slashdot, I can count on one hand the number of people that believe you.
Unless by "girlfriend" you meant "girl I barely know, who filed sexual harrassment charges after I creeped her out with an OhMiBod vibrator gift." That one I'd believe.
This is about the third time something like this has come up and I can't believe I still haven't seen the alternate name iRod suggested.
Me lost me cookie at the disco.
Gals, go natural and organic and let me introduce (in) to you my iFuck device. Its free and requires no batteries.
Table-ized A.I.
If you haven't spent much time in the UK, you may not realize that Ann Summers is a major retail chain, with hundreds of sex shops. It's like Victoria's Secret in the US, but harder-core.
specifically designed to cause confusion in the markeplace
Confusion?
If you can't tell the difference between a sex toy & a portable music player, then.... well, let's just say I don't want to borrow your iPod.
There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
... welcome our new iGasm vibrated female colleague overload! welcome our new iGasm vibrated female college undergrad!There, fixed that for you
Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
Damn porn filter at work.
Why, yes! I AM new here.
Some clarity on TM, at least in US...
You can trademark almost anything that creates a connection in a consumer's mind between a product/service and its origin. Historically this has included logos, words, sounds (Harley Davidson's engine noise), images, even colors (Corningware's "pink" insulation), shapes of products (Weber Grill), type of decoration in a restaurant, called "trade dress" (Taco Cabana).
If whenever you see commercials of a certain "style" and you think "Apple/iPod", then the style is likely trademark material. If another company's using the same style to sell a similar/related product (as opposed to engaging in satire or public comment which is more protected) then I'd put my money on the trademark holder.
Wrong again, at least in the US. Most trademark rights come from using the trademark, not from applying for it. The Trademark office register the mark for you, which gives you some considerable procedural advantages (hence there is a process sort of like patent application that you need to go through), but there's no requirement to register your mark in order to have a trademark. All of which is probably beside the point in this instance, since I bet Apple registered something related to whatever they're suing over.
"iAnal"
You do? Maybe we should talk.
"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
As far as I can tell, Apple is upset over the copying of the advert, not so much the device itself.
A recent UK Court of Appeal case has significantly narrowed the scope of Trademark protection, essentially stating that the public are savvy enough to recognise that the use of the same trademark in two different markets is not "passing off". However, this defense may be slightly scuppered by the ad, which does attempt a form of "passing off" and association.
The main complaint really seems to be blatant copying of the ad, and is therefore a Copyright issue. As others have stated, parody is not (officially) a defense in UK Copyright law, but taking the mickey has long been recognised unofficially. A classic example was the "Made In Wales" series of adverts which was parodied by the "Not the Nine O'Clock News" comedy show. The parody was so good , that it was alleged the Welsh Development Agency showed them to real potential clients alongside the original adverts. Also the term "Fair Use" does exist in UK law, and this may perhaps be construed to include parody.
Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
Karma: Chameleon
Did she just (very politely) tell Steve Jobs to stick it up his ass?