Slashdot Mirror


Handmade Steampunk Rayguns From the F/X Guys at Weta

An anonymous reader writes "Wired is presenting a gallery of artwork that inspired Weta's collectible rayguns, plus exclusive photos of the retrofurist sidearms. The article offers more than just images; each weapon has a description of where they were inspired from, as well as possible uses. 'In this illustration by Greg Broadmore, a hunter poses with his latest kill and his elegant retrofurist rifle ... "I started drawing these things just for fun," says Broadmore. "I did dozens of designs, all really stylized and Flash Gordon looking. I remember those black and white serials playing on TV as a kid and the imagery always stuck with me. Really hokey, but really scary and weird at the same time. And, of course, if you're a fan of classic rayguns you'll see the influence of the old toy rayguns. The Buck Rogers disintegrator pistol -- of course directly referenced in Han Solo's blaster in Star Wars -- is iconic, and that original raygun, along with many others, inspired me massively.'"

31 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Safety compliant? by johnny+cashed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These aren't toy guns, they're art pieces. No self respecting artist is going to make them "safety compliant".

  2. I'd rather see a firearm by Excelcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd rather see a sci-fi use a firearm, like Firefly did and Battlestar Galactica does, than have them insult my intelligence with the twisty, curvy, spiky, doo-dad-ly junk we've been fed the last fifty years. I mean, for artistic reasons, every show is going to want to have the iconic BFG every now and then. For humour value if nothing less. You see this in Firefly sometimes. But weapons exist for one reason, to make it easier to project force. I don't look back at "ray gun" designs with fondness. I see a bunch of catering to the lowest-common-denominator intelligence, let's make things look as funky different as possible just to make them look funky different. It was a tool used by bad writers and bad producers who didn't have content that was distinctive enough, so had to be distinctive with bling.

    1. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by l3mr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Other people just have fonds memories of old, trashy sci-fi movies or the Fallout games...these cater to that crowd. Me, for example.

      --
      The world always seems brighter when you've just made something that wasn't there before. - Neil Gaiman
    2. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But weapons exist for one reason, to make it easier to project force.

      And were science-fiction movies documentaries, you'd have a point. But they're not. They're entertainment, and I'm entertained by fancy weapons, loud explosions in space, and planetary princesses whose costumes are held up solely by centrifugal force.

      It was a tool used by bad writers and bad producers who didn't have content that was distinctive enough, so had to be distinctive with bling.

      "Content?" "Content" is for websites. Movies are a visual medium, and the art direction and photography can be at least as important to the movie as the script, if the director says so. If you don't want the creator mucking up the plot with sounds and visuals, read a novel. Just stay away from E.R. Burroughs, and other classic authors of the genre.

      I see a bunch of catering to the lowest-common-denominator intelligence

      For the record, I'm smarter than you. And I say, "Bring on the Laser Beams!"

    3. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 4, Funny

      "planetary princesses whose costumes are held up solely by centrifugal force."

      I think you meant: "held up [...] by the gravitational pull of their tits."

      --
      sig? Oh, that sig...
    4. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Me, too. These are art objects paying homage to designs from the beginnings of sci-fi and science itself. If you dont get the humor in the vials "phlogiston and aether" this is not for you.

      I can understand someone disliking bad and/or inappropriate set design, but some folks will have a bad attitude toward everything - honestly it's their loss.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    5. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you want to watch shows that portray things realistically, why are you watching sci-fi in the first place? Humans have always had a desire to make things look beautiful, or powerful, or graceful, etc. Firefly is a perfect example of things done for the aesthetics rather than because they're "practical"; heck, it's a western set in space. They often ride horses. The ship is designed to look like a big bug because it *can*. It has a butt and it lights up, for goodness' sake! I think you're barking up the wrong tree here.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    6. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by toQDuj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, surely not every part on an ordinary firearm was designed with pure functionality in mind. I am thinking of the "bling" on old revolvers. Pearl handles, patterns on the side and such.

      So the Bling on a ray-gun might be a little over the top in our eyes, perhaps they are nothing more than a simple bit of decoration, or (you never know) it might actually have function. No-one can tell wether they are useless twisty spiky, doo-dadly junk that are stuck to the side, or functional elements. That's fiction for you.

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    7. Re:I'd rather see a firearm by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you need a permit to buy a firearm.

      Not so with a laser.

  3. I want a Lazy Gun by 15Bit · · Score: 5, Interesting
  4. I don't see it... by Loligo · · Score: 2, Informative


    Beyond the images in the article, I just did a google image search for "buck rogers pistol" and don't see anything significantly relevant to Han Solo's D-44... if anything, it reminds me just how little they changed the Mauser Broomhandle to turn it into a blaster.

      -l

  5. Where's the handmade steampunk baggage scanner ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Along with a few work colleagues I met Richard Taylor here in New Zealand a year or so back after he'd just returned from the Academy Awards in LA. He showed us a metal carry case which contained a couple of these guns and mentioned in passing that he'd carried them with him on the flight home. I had mental pictures of the ATS guy sitting behind the LAX baggage scanner going through a "it's a gun, no wait, it's not a gun..." endless loop.

  6. Re:Steampunk = trendy tard-speak by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did an entire generation of people fail to learn basic words like 'archaic' and 'anachronistic' in high school? Maybe 'mechanical' was also missing from the vocabulary list.

    Well, steampunk is easier to write than "An archaic Victorian-era style mechanical device, with obviously modern/post-Victorian elements such as computers/lasers/etc"

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  7. Re:Steampunk = trendy tard-speak by Suertreus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least we don't say "tard-speak."

  8. Whaddaya mean, 'fiction'? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm building a Van de Graaff generator from which I'ma try accelereating an electron beam, or bolt. It won't of course be portable, but it would be fun if I could fling plasma a meter or so away from the VDG gen. With some metal sheets I could build a rather large air-gap capacitator that I could first charge with the VDG and then tap to a coil to pull the free electrons from the VDG.

    Okay, maybe a bit sci-fi, but I'm having fun building the VDG regardless. :D

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  9. Retrofurist? by Handyman · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the fsck is "retrofurist"? It's even in TFA. I'm guessing they meant to say "retrofuturist", but being lysdectics they had an excuse to use this abbrevion...

    1. Re:Retrofurist? by jcr · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the fsck is "retrofurist"?

      Someone who's furious in a retrograde manner?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Retrofurist? by famebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      What the fsck is "retrofurist"?

      A person who identifies with or is sexually attracted
      to old-fashioned stuffed toys and/or anthropomorphic
      animal characters in fiction and illustration.

      Derived from "furry", denoting the similar but more common
      inclination that accepts, and is chiefly oriented towards,
      more modern depictions. Adherents of retrofurism mostly
      use only "furist" to denote their group, feeling its
      clever variation on "furry" suffices to convey the archaic
      aspect. "Retro" is added mostly by outsiders to the group,
      or in communication with them, in order to avoid
      misunderstandings.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  10. Missing an important element! by bertok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish more artists would embrace realistic fantasy.

    It sounds like an oxymoron, but it's the difference between a movie only kids could enjoy, and something adults would want to go see too.

    The first thing that struck me about those pictures is that nobody would ever, ever, ever use one of those contrived contraptions in a battle. A weapon in a science fiction flick can shoot lasers, warp space, or spray hot grits, but no weapon, fictional or real, can have that many protrusions. You'd never get it into, our out of, a holster. Every branch and bush would tear it out of your hand. And a gun with a glass bulb as a functional unit? Are you kidding me? The reason the guns looked so awesome in Star Wars was because they were made from real guns. Many of them were made from, or based on, real, practical designs. The science fiction element was that they shot laser beams.

    There's suspension of disbelief, then there's suspension of common sense. Not the same thing!

    Rant over. Please return to your scheduled fawning. 8)

    1. Re:Missing an important element! by vidarh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you also complain because cartoons look drawn?

      These specifically reference a subgenre that never concerned itself with realism.

      Realism or at least practicality in sci fi has it's place, but this is not it.

    2. Re:Missing an important element! by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't agree with you. All auxilery modular options an an 'mech' with extensions make it look kooler.

      http://images.google.nl/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=nl &q=mech

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Missing an important element! by denali99755 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an awesome aspect in steampunk culture that is concerned with practicality as well, though...google 'steampunk keyboard' to see what I mean. IANASP, but the element of the steampunk aesthetic that really impresses me is the imagining of real-world devices with a late nineteenth century twist.

      I agree with parent...these don't look practical at all; any self-respecting steampunk warrior would be better off with a trusty .45. ;)

    4. Re:Missing an important element! by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please, just because your imagination and sense of wonder is so limited, don't try to drag the rest of us down with you.

      Thank you.

  11. Re:Safety compliant? by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where's the orange plastic blob at the barrel end?

    If I put a blob for you, would you still hand a $1500 art piece to your kid to "shoot" around?

  12. Steampunk Air Rifles by Zobeid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, but I find those toys far less impressive than these: http://www.glbarnes.com/

    These are some of the most steampunk-ish actual working devices I've seen. Some are fancier than others, with the more ornate models looking like they came right out of Myst. They aren't movie or vidgame props, they are some of the most powerful and accurate (and expensive) air rifles in the world -- and all hand-made by Gary Barnes himself. Although not technically (or legally, in the USA) considered to be firearms, these air rifles have been used successfully for hunting deer, wild hogs, and in at least one case a buffalo.

  13. Re:Steampunk = trendy tard-speak by aurispector · · Score: 2, Insightful

    trendy tard speak or not, as soon as I heard the term "Steampunk" I knew exactly what they were talking about.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  14. Re:Steampunk = trendy tard-speak by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering you're the only one who has ever been annoyed by having a concise, unique word to describe something...

    I'm thinking it's you.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  15. where have all the trekkies gone/long time passing by dpiven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article's been out for five hours and NOT ONE /.ER HAS USED THE WORD "PHASER".

    (Well, until now.)

    Are all the trekkies getting hammered and watching Boston Legal these days?

  16. Real "rayguns" by esc67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is somebody who builds rayguns out of scrap. Perhaps these are more to your liking. I believe one of them is a functioning pea-shotter!

    http://claytonbailey.com/galleryrayguns.htm

    Makezine published an nice article about these some time ago.

  17. These are even better "in the flesh"! by AaronLawrence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These rayguns are fantastic pieces of art, of a kind you rarely see. I saw them at the Weta stand at an expo in Wellington - they were only on display then, not for sale - and they really look like the business as imagined by 1950's science fiction. They seem a little used, covered in mysterious spikes and weird tubes. And it's real glass and metal, as far as I can tell, hand-welded etc. Theres a good sense of humour in the marketing too.

    Pretty amazing to see so many cynics completely miss the point on Slashdot. This is one thing I thought most geeks would be right into. Humorous yet artistic rayguns!

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  18. Careful with that capacitor... by mbessey · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The VDG is safer than a Tesla coil, so for a newbie like me it seems like just the ring thing."

    That's only the case because the VDG creates such a small current. If you start storing it, you're increasing the potential for a lethal shock. A square foot or so of capacitor can easily store enough charge to kill you, depending on the dielectric. At 30 KV or so, the discharges from my homemade HV capacitors sounded like gunshots - I got complaints from the neighbors.

    As for your other idea, I'm not convinced that it'll work the way you think it will. You probably won't be able to move enough charge onto an object to make much of a magnetic field when it moves. The amount of electrons "flowing" in a DC current is very very high. Take a look at the definitions of the Ampere, and the Coulomb to get some idea of the quantities involved.