Slashdot Mirror


Robotic Ecologies

Roland Piquepaille writes "The University of Virginia (UVA) School of Architecture has started a new program about 'robotic ecologies' which wants to answer the question: Will robots take over architecture? As said the program leader, 'This research is not just about architectural machines that move. It is about groups of architectural machines that move with intelligence.' Apparently, buildings tracking our movements and adapting their shape or texture according human presence are not far fetched. Maybe one day, we'll talk to our homes and they'll answer."

17 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Flaws by biocute · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What if you could talk to a building and it could talk back?
    Then what about the wife we already have?

    What if a building could adapt its shape, texture, light, sounds, and heat to your presence?
    Only if it can also read our moods. How would it know if I am in the mood to read a book (good light source) or to watch TV (dimmer)?

    And most importantly the question every slashdotter wants to know -- What if we want to have sex on the kitchen bench, instead of cooking? Would the building turn down the lights and maybe warm the bench a little?

    I'm not expecting a machine to figure things out themselves, but its ability to learn on circumstances is important to serve us appropriately.

    I guess it's human's unpredictability that makes robots imperfect.

    1. Re:Flaws by IgLou · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're fine so long as you're not having sex on the counter. In which case the most likely thing would be a floating point error that causes speakers to blare out "Warning! Warning! Unauthorized biological organisms on the cooking surface! Sterilize! Sterilize!" That's when you regret your gas stove that it quickly adapts into a flame thrower.

      This post has just saved a life... I know it.

      --

      Oops, how did this get here?
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Flaws by Ltar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ""Only if it can also read our moods. How would it know if I am in the mood to read a book (good light source) or to watch TV (dimmer)?""

      How about this- if we turn on the TV, the lights dim. if we are holding a book (probably with an imbedded RFID tag) and stop moving for a bit, it'll focus a light on us.

      Why does it need to read our minds, when our actions are so much more easily observable?

  2. Will bots replace Roland? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Funny

    1)Make a bot that scans tech-related sites.
    2)Upon seeing new content, bot posts it to slashdot.
    3)Bribe the editors regularly.
    4)Put ads on your site.
    5)Link everything to your site.
    6)Profit!!

  3. Re:If...When by Craptastic+Weasel · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Maybe one day, we'll talk to our homes and they'll answer."

    Basement! I need a status report! Set sunlight shields to block! And where the heck is the virgin I ordered in the holo deck?

  4. Metropolitan Living Homes by Corvus9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was an Alternate Reality Game created for the A.I movie that involved "living homes" going insane, murdering, and being murdered. This game was arguably more creative and involved than the movie.

    The ARG site is gone, but there are still some notes on the living homes at the Cloudmakers site.

  5. homes as a species by anarchy_man3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was discussing with one of my friends about how we don't use houses, houses use us to build them and spread across the world. Houses as a species have evolved to adapt to all parts of the earth and even into space. Dude, like whooaaah...

    1. Re:homes as a species by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I was discussing with one of my friends about how we don't use houses, houses use us"
      Are you perhaps in Soviet Russia?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  6. Contextual instructions by tttonyyy · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I utter the instruction, "Squash!" to my building, I sincerely hope it delivers a diluted, fruit-flavoured drink rather than attempt to compress me into a small cube...

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Contextual instructions by PequalsNP · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, we have beta testers to work out that sort of thing. By the time it makes it to market, the obvious ways of killing you will be gone, only the sly self-aware HAL style of killing you will remain.

  7. oblig by Digitus1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome you to my new house overlords.

  8. the unblinking eye by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if a building could adapt its shape, texture, light, sounds, and heat to your presence?
    Only if it can also read our moods. How would it know if I am in the mood to read a book (good light source) or to watch TV (dimmer)? Good choice, Dave, the on-line reviews are very positive.
    When you're done, would you like to play a game of chess?
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  9. YOU live in it! by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if a building were equipped with sensors to track your movement through a space and could adapt its shape, texture, light, sounds, and heat to your presence?

    So, we're talking about a thousand-ton slab of moving floors and sliding walls, changing its heat and lighting... with you inside it? Constantly transforming and shapeshifting, all running off some intern's Java program?

    All I can picture is that garbage-compactor scene from Star Wars.

    1. Re:YOU live in it! by glittalogik · · Score: 2, Funny

      I lived in a house like that for 4 or 5 hours. LSD for the win!

  10. Re:My big fat house by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think that bigger houses = more isolation among its inhabitants. Back in the day when people would built a bigger house it was quite often to accommodate extended family (parents, in-laws, brothers, cousins, aunts etc...). Today I see 2 or 3 member families that have houses with 4+ bedrooms. They can go all day without seeing each other and would probably have to IM each other when the dinner is ready.

    I grew up in a small two room apartment (that's just two rooms, they are both bedrooms and living rooms and study rooms and offices) in the Soviet Union and sometimes I had my cousins stay over as well. Looking back I would consider my childhood one of the happiest times in my life. We'd all gather in our small kitchen, family members (aunts, uncles and even neighbors!) would drop by unexpectedly for dinner and it was great -- I never though "gosh I need another 4 rooms to live comfortably".

    There is a level of intimacy and closeness that is lost as families move into huge mansions and never see each other for days.

  11. Re:My big fat house by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The reason for this, at least around here, is the disproportionate rise in property value.

    At one point, the 'mega home' was dramatically more expensive than a more modest building. In a world where the plot of land is worth 10k, a 100k building costs nearly half as much as a 200k building that's twice the size.

    Today, those plots of land aren't 10k, they're 400k. After you put a 100k building on it its 500k. Or for 600k you can get build a house twice the size. As a result it just doesn't make sense to build a small house on such expensive property.

  12. The reliable Stanislaw Lem by toby · · Score: 3, Informative

    Prefigured responsive buildings in his wonderful Return from the Stars. Highly recommended.

    --
    you had me at #!