Slashdot Mirror


Screencasts of Installing MythTV Via MythDora 4.0

peterdaly writes "MythDora 4 is a MythTV 'in-a-box' style distribution based on Fedora Core 6. With the help of a RedHat employee and author Jarod Wilson, MythDora 4 has made great strides in hardware compatibility and ease of installation. It is designed to format your hard drive and install everything needed for a fully functional MythTV System. MythPVR.com has created a three-part screencast of the installation process covering MythDora installation, configuration, and MythTV setup. If you have had problem installing MythTV in the past due to hardware compatibility issues, it might be time to give it another chance."

38 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Fedora? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having recently fled from the barren dependency hell of Fedora, (to Feisty), I am perplexed as to why anyone wanting to install a user friendly Linux distro of any kind would choose Fedora as their base distro. Hardware detection was... OK, but there were innumerable problems with package management, configurations and yes, software availability. I mean, will the box play mp3 files? DVDs? Fedora is not a distro known for these capabilities.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Fedora? by scribblej · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As someone who has been running MythTV on Ubuntu boxes for years now, I agree. Skip Redhat.

      Installing MythTV on modern versions of Ubuntu is easy:

      apt-get install mythtv-server mythtv-frontend

      That's it, you're done*!

      (* I assume; I run my clients and server on seperate machines and the server is still a few versions behind the Ubuntu curve)

    2. Re:Fedora? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh, the same is true of Fedora, which is what I used to build my myth front/backends. Honestly, why all the hate?

    3. Re:Fedora? by LDoggg_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I mean, will the box play mp3 files? DVDs? Fedora is not a distro known for these capabilities.

      Both distros share the same philosophy with regards to packaging patent encumbered things like mp3 and DVD decoders in the main distro and repos. It is very simple on both of these to add them in post-install.

      Fiesty does make it a bit easier, but to be fair Fedora 6 was released quite a bit earlier than fiesty, let's pass judgement next week when Fedora 7 is released.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    4. Re:Fedora? by gregbaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just did a fresh MythTV install with Feisty a few weeks ago, and that was it exactly. It automatically recognized my Hauppauge 250, and all was good.

      I had to edit a couple of lines in the LIRC config for the remote, but that was all.

    5. Re:Fedora? by jddj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what KnoppMyth is for.

      Have to say that I wasn't a fan of the look-and-feel of the KnoppMyth setup last time I looked at it (for openers, I'm in the can't-stand-KDE camp...). It -IS- great to have a fantastic bootable-CD of this project.

      Ordinarily this isn't a problem - don't like what your distro provides, install something else, right?

      The thing is, you go for MythDora or Knoppix to pretty much have an appliance. You change something on your own, no telling how you'll get the box like you want it next time they upgrade the distro. My feeling (and I know some will disagree) is that if you want to run one of these appliance distros, you either take the stock distro, or do something else.

      Once you move out of the stock packages, you already ARE doing something else, so why not do something you'd enjoy like Etch or Fiesty?

      The other thing is that if you only want to fiddle with an appliance install, you'll be way behind the current release version if KnoppMyth is any indication. So you sit and wait for your whole distro to catch up with the current action (and I'm talking current official release here, not just the nightlies).

      All that said, I haven't looked at the screencasts, and I -DO- like the idea of more of these easy installs showing up - MythTV is a bear without some hand-holding.

      Jarod has been a fantastic booster for MythTV and deserves a big-up for all the help he's provided over the years.

    6. Re:Fedora? by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried building my myth box on ubuntu last weekend. Ubuntu and myth were trivial, but I spent a good 6 hours and read about a dozen howtos and couldn't get lirc running my pvr150 remote and blaster. Even if everything else is working perfectly, it's a no-go without lirc. This happens to me every time; everything except for one dumb thing works and I'm SOL.

    7. Re:Fedora? by caseih · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a silly statement. In the case of either distribution, it's a matter of having a good repository. Ubuntu is not somehow magically free from dependency hell. It's just that Ubuntu happens to have very good and very extensive repositories. Likewise, Fedora has a large number of third-party repository that covers a wide range of software needs, including MythTV. The only time I've ever really gotten into dependency hell was some years ago with Debian itself. Honestly there are lots of arguments you could make against Fedora, but this is just not one of them.

      If you want a legitimate criticism, and one that's been answered in Fedora 7, adding third-party repositories has never been trivial for Fedora newbies.

      But to think that one distro is magically better as far as dependency problems is concerned, is absurd.

    8. Re:Fedora? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really, so that installs and configures and sets up the databases for MySQL? Does that set up all your channels, the XML TV feed and all the other stuff that is required. After messing around with MythTV for a few hours and getting no where, I found SageTV and bought that. I've been happy ever since. I'm using the windows version right now, but they do have a Linux version, and if it works even half as good as the windows version, then it beats MythTV hands down. Especially on the ease of setup issues.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Fedora? by robgig1088 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wont play them until you install a DVD decoder. Pain in the rear if you ask me....

    10. Re:Fedora? by msevior · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone who runs both Ubuntu and FC6 distros, I think you have it backwards...

      For FC6 just install the livna rpm's like this:

      # rpm -Uhv http://rpm.livna.org/livna-release-6.rpm
      # rpm --import http://rpm.livna.org/RPM-LIVNA-GPG-KEY

      and enjoy the benefits of all the grey packages delivered via yum. Personally, I like the Fedora approach of giving totally free products a boost.

      The main benefit of Fedora over over Ubuntu is the actively maintained Fedora Extra's. These are generally updated as soon as the upstream maintainers make a release as opposed to waiting 6 months for the next Ubuntu upgrade.

      Anyway now that the standard Ubuntu troll is out of the way, all this is moot. The point is that THIS FC6-based distro has all the grey packages available on a nice easy to use ISO.

    11. Re:Fedora? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might try Knoppmyth; it's a Debian semi-equivalent to MythDora. I have a PVR-150 and I'm in the process of getting it set up with the remote. It's not quite out-of-the-box ready, you still need to do some tweaking for the PVR-150s receiver and blaster, but it's not too bad (or so I've heard).

      They have some decent support forums too, although unfortunately they're not open to the public (you have to register even to read, for reasons I don't quite get -- bandwidth, maybe). There should be a HOWTO in there on setting up the PVR-150's remote on the latest version.

      Alternately, you could just get a StreamZap remote. For $30 it works straight out of the box, plug in and restart, no screwing around at all. I have that on my other MythTV box (that PVR-150 didn't come with a remote) and if I can't get the Hauppauge remote working in two or three hours I'm just going to buy another one. My sanity is worth it, and MythTV is the sort of thing that will drive you up a wall if you let it.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    12. Re:Fedora? by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I like RPM, but that is a problem. Particularly when the dependencies doesn't specify what the package need to operate, but what it need to operate in a specific way. There's plenty of cases where you can just rebuild an RPM with a Require: entry taken out and everything works fine... I'd love to see a way of specifying "recommended" dependencies, that doesn't have to be present, but that will add capabilities. It could dramatically cut dependencies for a huge number of RPMs.

      Another issue, though, is that a lot of apps are prime examples of bad separation of concerns - you'll find tons of dependencies caused by compile time (i.e. via configure) decisions that could trivially have been deferred to load time with trivial plugin infrastructures, giving users much more flexibility.

      I'm used to recompiling stuff, but I'd rather not have to much with the packages I install just to disable or enable features, and I'm not alone, which is a key reason why some distros err on the side of enabling almost every option and add a ton of dependencies instead.

    13. Re:Fedora? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am perplexed as to why anyone wanting to install a user friendly Linux distro of any kind would choose Fedora as their base distro.

      Anybody wanting to install a user friendly Linux distro doesn't know what a "Linux distro" is and doesn't want to learn. They'll install whatever their buddy hands them. (Then, most likely, give up and go back to Windows after a few days.)

      By the time you start talking about distros, much less "dependancies," you're way beyond the user friendly stage.

  2. PS3? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wanna see someone port MythTV's codecs to the PS3's Cell DSPs so I can use it as my PVR direct to my HDMI TV and 7.1 surround.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:PS3? by tji · · Score: 2, Informative

      The XBox can not support playback of HD video (broadcast HD, 1080i or 720p MPEG2). So, aside from being fairly large, and fairly loud, it's too slow to do HD.. not exactly the ideal myth frontend.

      The best one I have found, albeit quite a bit more expensive, is the Mac Mini. It rans a full Myth Frontend app, with full support for HD video and surround sound.

    2. Re:PS3? by tji · · Score: 2, Informative

      MythTV's frontend app has already been ported to run on the PS3. MythTV doesn't have a special codec, it uses MPEG2 for most video (e.g. broadcast HD in the U.S. is MPEG2).

      But, it doesn't support HD playback. The problem is not CPU power, it's video hardware. Linux runs in a VM on the PS3, which does not offer virtualized accelerated video playback, so it cannot do HD. If Sony ever improves the video support for Linux, the PS3 would make an excellent frontend.

    3. Re:PS3? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux runs on the Cell's embedded Power RISC, which is not very fast running Linux apps, especially at video processing, especially compared to its lightning-fast DSPs. That's the point of running Linux on the PS3, unless it's just a geek trick. Porting the codecs to the DSPs will make a PS3 an excellent $600 HDMI PVR, with many picture-in-picture features, and even plenty of previously unseen editing features.

      Sony won't be improving Linux's video support, but rather it's up to us to port apps to the parallel DSPs Sony sells us so cheap.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  3. Fedora Myth(TV)ology by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who already have Fedora installed, there's an excellent guide available at http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/fcmyth.php which is simple to follow and worked for me on the first try (I went with a Hauppage 150 card). Personally, I preferred installing it the software myself, so I have a better idea of where to look when something breaks. I have yum cron'ed to run nightly, and so far I haven't had the install broken by any new packages since the install (4 or so months ago).

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  4. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by biggyfred · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am by no means an expert of any kind. In fact, I'm about as amateur as it gets. Before about a week ago, I had very little experience with linux (edgy, FC3 for about 5 mins). This is my quick take on the three:

    KnoppMyth was way too over my head. I'm certain that it was my inability to grasp knoppix that was the problem. User problem to be sure, but if that counts as an issue... Knoppix did do great with lirc and my remote right out of the box, a sore spot for me with the other distros I used.

    Whereas KnoppMyth felt like swimming in a ocean of misunderstanding, MythDora felt like death by a thousand cuts. It was pretty, but I kept feeling like I ran into hurdles over... and over.. and over. I used Jared's guide, but like all things, the book can only take you so far..

    I ended up throwing Feisty on my HTPC and loading up a full backend/frontend/desktop. Biggest problems were my Avermedia A180 (DVB issues) and lirc. The level of user generated documentation with Ubuntu made the difference for me.

    Feel free to disagree with me. I can't defend any of this with anything more than my personal experience.

  5. Re:Noob questions... by jdunn14 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, to work with a remote you need some sort of an IR receiver. And if the machine needs to control a set-top box of some sort (direct tv for example) you may need an IR emitter as well. Coincidentally, I happen to sell such things: http://iguanaworks.net/products.psp

    Yes it's a shameless plug, but when you throw up a softball like this I just have take a swing at it.

  6. Re:Noob questions... by pimpbott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Hauppague PVR-150,250, and 350 are the best game in town for tuners. Fry's sells the PVR150 for $120 if you have to get it right away, or I've seen them online for as cheap as $60 for plain box with no remote. You can do remote through your LAN I just built a MythDora 3.2 box (doh! Could have done MythDora 4.0!) and it works quite nicely on a P3/850 with an NVidia 6200 based video card with S-Video out. Just this last weekend, I rebuilt the thing with a 320GB drive instead of the tiny drive I had lying around so it wouldn't run out of space so quickly. It also sounds a lot less like a jet engine when running. More info here: www.mythtvtalk.com Check out the forums.

  7. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by cesman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My goal with KnoppMyth is to make it easy. Obviously, it wasn't for you. In what ways can we improve KnoppMyth to make it easier?

    Regards,

    Cecil

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  8. Re:ubuntu myth by cesman · · Score: 3, Informative

    You have obviously not spent anytime in #mythtv-user. I've seen lots of folks come in there and ask for help with install MythTV on Ubuntu.

    Regards,

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  9. Re:Just like..... by cesman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry if my personal and professional life gets in the way of making a release for you. The day you have to pay for KnoppMyth is the day you can stop bitching about releases taking too long.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  10. Re:Noob questions... by laddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Getting a remote to work isn't worth the trouble. I have a PVR-250 in my Myth machine and I ditched the remote for a wireless keyboard a while back. Much easier.

  11. Overrated by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried MythDora, but frankly I got tired of the "Swiper, no swiping!" popups every time I tried to record a show. I've heard there's a MythBusters plugin to get around them, but I don't think the walrus mustache is an acceptable tradeoff.

  12. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be nice if extras like exporting to DVD-R, webbrowsers, etc were easier to find. And, when found, install. Finding things on the forums is a pain.

    Also, last time I tried, changing your zip code/postal code was broken if you put in a Canadian postal code (They go like this X0X 0X0). That was about a year ago though.

    And dealing with things like two IR outputs + one IR input using different methods with LIRC would be nice. As it stands I had to compile LIRC by hand with differing module names to deal with this. I'm sure there's plenty of people with multiple Cable/Satellite boxes that have this issue.

    Overall, I love Knoppmyth! I'll have to figure out if I want to risk an upgrade to the latest version or not yet.

    PPS - A table showing MythTV versions included with each release of Knoppmyth would be nice, so you can easily match up custom installed frontends.

    Thanks again!

  13. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by cesman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In terms of finding programs, etc. Those are all accessible via the MythTV menu. But I can see where better documentation came come in handy. A while ago, I started on a much updated pamphlet, but it is disheartening to work on something and people doesn't read it. A lot of the question I get in IRC (freenode.net #knoppmyth), are covered in the pamphlet. If only people would RTFM.... But I digress. More work is due on the pamphlet, I've just been busy with my professional life.

    In terms of MythTV related issues... Those are MythTV issues and not KnoppMyth specific. Ironically, one of the areas we try and make it easier for users is in MythWeather. Your zipcode is automatically retrieved from the db and entered for you.

    I don't ever recall reading or hearing about issues w/ multiple LIRC. When issues like this occur, if you want to see it fixed in a future release, you should bring it to my attention of the forum or via PM or email. The development team isn't very large. We don't have all the hardware that is out there. Even our testers may not have the hardware you have. So, if you want to see something fixed, the best way to bring it to our attention and provide details. Same thing goes if you fix an issue. Provide details and ask to test.

    Thanks for the feedback.

    Regards,

    Cecil

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  14. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by cesman · · Score: 3, Informative

    KnoppMyth is meant to be used as a set-top box, not a general purpose computer. KnoppMyth already includes MythBrowser.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  15. Computers have always been political. by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People care about avoiding lawsuits and yet it looks like one of the major suppliers of MP3 players recently lost a large patent infringement lawsuit earlier this year to the tune of billions of dollars (no doubt an appeal is pending). If the patent holder isn't paid off, the patent holder has the power to create a huge hassle for lots of ordinary people who will turn to their proprietor and ask why they didn't charge enough money to pay for the requisite licensing fee (or why a loyal customer would be left to the ravages of the lawyers). Just ask Apple about Paul Heckel's ability to get an undisclosed sum from them over patents that were allegedly infringed in Hypercard (or so says Heckel and his patent lawyer). People do not benefit from living a life where they are spared the harsh reality -- the US patent system as it pertains to software -- that exists for so many others. Lashing out at people for making you aware of that reality won't help people avoid these dangers.

    As for software not being political, that has never been the case. Any activity involving multiple people is political; computer software is no exception. Only the naive believe they can divorce themselves from politics. While it can be unpleasant learning that computer-related work is filled with political ugliness you were unaware of; learning that the lives of others is more harsh than you knew. But it's worth knowing so that you can better understand how things really work, behave ethically in accordance with your newfound knowledge, and sleep easier.

  16. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by spisska · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've run MythTV since 0.14 on Knoppmyth and Fedora -- starting with FC3.

    When I started, Knoppmyth was way over my head -- particularly the finishing touches to get everything running properly. It was my first real hands-dirty experience with Linux and I appreciated for all I learned. I did did manage to get an ancient K6-3D system running Knoppmyth -- not well enough to put in my livingroom, but well enough to prove the concept and that it was worth the time and effort to build a new system on more capable hardware.

    My second system was a P3 700 built on FC3 following Jarod Wilson's definitive guide, mainly because I felt that following the guide to transform a generic install into a MythTV appliance would teach me a lot about what the Myth components were, how they all fit together, how to make them all fit together in Linux, and what to do when something went wrong. I was right.

    I built a third machine (my current master beckend/frontend) on FC4 also following Jarod's guide but this time on a P4 2.5 machine.

    By this time I was ready to start adding FE capabilities, but I already knew the process of installation, knew about the components and dependencies, and no longer felt the need for yumming or smarting in kernel modules and so on. I used Knoppmyth to turn my old P3 700 former-backend into a frontend.

    This setup worked well through several upgrades -- FC on the backend, Knoppmyth on the frontend with the only caveat being that both machines have to be running the same version of Myth. Upgrade one, you have to upgrade the other.

    Even though this was about two years ago, the Knoppmyth install was easy and painless, and I was prepared to deal with irregularities like tweaking xorg.conf. I also really appreciated that the Knoppmyth CD would let you run a frontend off the CD -- allowing you to instantly test hardware without touching the drive.

    Last weekend, I finally retired the P3. It's currently on holiday, but will soon return to service as a file server. Instead I built a new frontend on an Athlon 64 4000.

    I decided to give Mythdora a whirl since I know it's been under heavy development including the involvement of Jarod. I was really impressed with how smoothly and quickly the installation went, including post-install scripts to handle things like IR hardware and binary nvidia drivers (I know, I know, but the binary driver really works better for Myth than the Free one). I went from having a pile of boxes at 4 pm to a working Mythtv system at 9:30. It might have been quicker but I had to run to the shop when I ran out of beer.

    I didn't try a Knoppmyth install on this hardware, but have no doubt that it would have gone just as smoothly. Cecil deserves a lot of respect and credit for the fantastic job he has done with Knoppmyth over the years.

    Of course I did have quite a bit of Myth-specific experience behind me and knew from the start to buy hardware that was rock-solid compatible -- like an nforce board, nvidia gfx card, turtle beach sound card, on-board 10/100 LAN, etc.

    The point is that by last weekend I was a lot more familiar with Fedora than with Debian, so I was really happy to be able to so painlessly migrate my FE to Fedora. I have no doubt that those more familiar with Debian will be just as happy with what Cecil has done in Knoppix.

    And more than anything, lot of credit is owed to the folks behind MythTV -- from Isaac Richards, the original creator, and all the key developers, to folks like Jarod, Cecil, and Dennis for enormous contributions in making Myth more accessible, to all the numerous active and helpful folks on the mailing list. They've made MythTV into a product that truly is a world-beater -- by far the most powerful, most flexible, most extensible, and downright most pleasurable media engine on the planet.

    Here's looking to 0.21.

  17. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by dashslotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I installed knoppmyth on my first myth box about 2 years ago. At the time it was the distro. of choice for easy, automated installations. It worked well on my "lowrider" (underpowered, ancient) system. The problem that ultimately killed that box was that the automated installation program set up a small (~4gb IIRC) partition for applications by default, and gave the rest to the AV partition. I wanted to install _every_ app. that had to do with multimedia, so this became too restrictive ultimately.

    For my next box (considering the first a proof of concept), I went all out an spec'd an efficient, yet capable machine (I also plan to run Astrisk (voip server) on it, a web server, etc, etc). Unfortunately for me, I bought a bad ram stick that wasn't on the vendors list. Before I figured this out, I installed many distros to try to get the hardware running.
    These include:

    - Simply Mepis
    - Knoppmyth
    - DreamLinux
    - Mythdora
    - Ubuntu 6

    After I figured out my ram problem, I now had to choose from among these distros based on my experience installing most of them several times.
    - I did not like the knoppmyth custom installer (cumbersome, ambiguous at times), so I ruled that out.
    - Mythdora just wasn't for me. I've always used debian-based distros, so that bias was enough to cause me to look elsewhere.
    - I remember thinking that Simply Mepis was a great out-of-the-box distro with a slick user I/F, but the community forums were mostly Portuguese (I think, Brazil, IIRC??).
    - I don't remember too much about Dream linux.
    - In the end, I went with Ubuntu.

    Using Ubuntu meant that I had to install a few more packages than with some of the other distros (e.g. mySQL, mythserver, mythfrontend), but there was plenty of community documentation to walk me through all of that. The same is true of all of the applications that I plan to load on it someday (once it was good enough for my wife to use, I kind of moved on to other projects for a while...(ahem, ADD/ADHD, cough).....) The Ubuntu UI is also pretty wife/gf friendly, which can be a key issue in household mythtv acceptance.

    My .02 based on my experience.

    --
    I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
  18. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by Ngarrang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only people would RTFM.... But I digress. More work is due on the pamphlet, I've just been busy with my professional life.

    Cecil, you are living in a dream world. Most people don't RTFM. Even when asked. Even if it brought world peace, turned lead into gold and allowed cars to run on water.

    Easy to use means not having to open the manual, that the screen tells you everything you need to know, such that a 5 year old can learn to use it. It is this very familiarity that keeps Windows on top, because it is what people know. Linux has to fight this mentality. It is a shame that so many Linux enthusiasts don't understand this.

    Treat the average user like cattle, or sheep, if you prefer. Don't give them a choice. Choice is confusing. I like to call these users 12 O'Clocks because they are same people who's VCR's are forever punished to flashing 12:00

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  19. This should be good by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the parent as such a fine example, I look forward to an unbiased, unemotional discussion on the pros and cons of different Linux distributions. I'm sure it will be based entirely on objective facts, supported by careful citations, and not contain any anecdotal evidence or personal opinions.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  20. Re:Just like..... by teachinggeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I don't personally use your distribution I want to thank you for making it available.

    Your hard work IS appreciated.

  21. Re:Knoppmyth vs MythDora by cesman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think if you were to install KnoppMyth, you'd see that is "like cattle". I personally think MythTV is easy to use. Granted, if can be difficult to install, hence my work on KnoppMyth.

    When KnoppMyth was first introduced, the manual was sparse. The pamphlet now stands at about 40 pages. Now, the reason that came about is because people asked specifics and I wanted to provided a great understanding of the different parts of KnoppMyth.

    Frankly, I think the attitude of not reading or not wanting to read is wrong. That is part of reason we have a monopoly in Redmond. Open your eyes and your mind....

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  22. Re:Whats with the Fedora Bashing? by ettlz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's disguised anti-Red Hatism from those who resent a company making money out of Linux. Mostly ungrateful fucks who don't realise just how much Red Hat's money puts back into the system. There are also a lot of lazy buggers out there who can't be bothered to figure out how to make it work and talk shit about yum and rpm. Add in those who don't seem to realise that Fedora eschews non-Free/possibly patented stuff by default and haven't figured out what a third-party repository is: "I can't play MP3s!" "MP3 is covered by software patents and so its inclusion in the distro is legally dubious. You just need the extra packages from (some repo)." "What's (some repo)? Where do I get that?" "Google is your friend." "Whaaat? That's crap!" "Well fuck off back to Windows, then." It's l33t to bash Red Hat and Fedora (which does look better) and sing the praises of Ubuntu's supposed ease. Lock 'em up in a small room with a clean box and a copy of FreeBSD; then see how l33t they feel after an hour or so.