Slashdot Mirror


City Almost Loses 450K to Keylogger

SierraPete writes "The city of Carson, California (a suburb of Los Angeles) was the target of a 6-digit theft of cash. The LA Times reports that information taken from a keylogger was used to attempt to steal $450K from the city's treasury. Quick work by the city froze most of the funds, but it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home."

158 comments

  1. 6 digit theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'figures', sizzlechest.

    1. Re:6 digit theft? by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you've heard of a "five finger discount", right? Maybe this guy had a birth defect.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    2. Re:6 digit theft? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Funny

      He should really stay away from Spaniards with scars on their faces, then.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  2. Obligatory... by dteichman2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pwned.

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    1. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot

      No offense, but your sig doesn't make any sense. It should be:

      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.O=slashdot

  3. Physical Keylogger by wdr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ummmm... how exactly would having anti-virus or anti-spyware stop things, if it's a physical keylogger?

    Do you know how these things work?

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    1. Re:Physical Keylogger by creativeHavoc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I STFA and I STFS but I found no trace of anyone refering to a "physical keylogger" ... only you.

      --
      insight through the mind
    2. Re:Physical Keylogger by ajanp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There's no mention of the method used to install the keylogger onto the treasurer's computer. They mention it was a laptop, but its a pretty far leap to assume that the hacker used a physical keylogger when the entire thing is just as likely, if not more so, to have been done remotely.

      It's also probably worth mentioning that the keylogger was likely active for atleast a minimum of a day or two, likely much longer, considering it's mentioned that the keylogger tracked the treasurer's keystrokes until the hacker discovered the appropriate passwords AND the hacker stole the money over a couple days. With this longer exposure, especially if the keystrokes were being monitored remotely, there's a good chance that an anti-virus program with heuristics scanning running in the background (or atleast a decent software firewall) could have flagged the suspicious behavior and perhaps identified the keylogger program being used.

      At the least, I think the poster is trying to convey that proper computer security could have helped to secure the computer and identify the problem earlier (the larger amount of 358,000 was stolen on the second day) or helped stop it outright.

      --
      File Deletion is Murder.
    3. Re:Physical Keylogger by pionzypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the other replies have stated, I don't remember them mentioning a physical keylogger. They do exist though. They sit in between the keyboards ps/2 plug and the systems ps/2 slot (USB varieties work the same). It looks like they just intercept and log the keystrokes, no software to detect on the host pc and no login needed.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    4. Re:Physical Keylogger by derEikopf · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was a physical keylogger since she was using a laptop.

    5. Re:Physical Keylogger by StikyPad · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ummm... how exactly would you place a physical keylogger on a laptop?

      Did you read the fscking article?

    6. Re:Physical Keylogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think a laptop keylogger would be much more insidious.

      If you could make one small enough, who would EVER notice it?
      (obviously you would need different models for each mfgr/fleet)

      I would notice something odd sticking off my desktop - Instantly.

      Maybe that's because it's all blinging with LED's n shit...
      Have to put it on the desk to show the fanbois how pwnt they are.

      So there you have it. Blinging rig pwns hackers.

    7. Re:Physical Keylogger by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      Keylogger? They didn't even say that word!

      It was a COOKIE1!!

      *thud*

      Oops, I mean

      *fud*

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    8. Re:Physical Keylogger by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's no mention of the method used to install the keylogger onto the treasurer's computer.

      Yes there is.

      Armed with a spyware program, the thieves tracked Avilla's moves on her laptop and obtained bank passwords.

      That is, unless they don't know what the word "spyware" means. Being reporters, they might just assume that spyware means what it sounds like -- any software used to spy on you, including something picking up keystrokes from a physical keylogger.


      But then, it also seems like it would be difficult to make a physical keylogger that communicates reliably with the outside world:

      Each time Treasurer Karen Avilla logged into her laptop computer in the morning, someone was looking--virtually--over her shoulder, watching every keystroke.

      That sort of implies it's being done in realtime. Of course, they could always mean it was a physical keylogger, which the "hacker" then collected and dumped...


      Then again, it's a laptop. If you have physical access to a laptop for long enough and with enough tools to install a physical keylogger, it's probably easier to carry the thing off and hope there's something valuable on the hard drive.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    9. Re:Physical Keylogger by Aliriza · · Score: 1

      Imo for big money transfers instructions to the bank is a better way , it will take time for online banking to be safer.

    10. Re:Physical Keylogger by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what I reckon?

      Keylogger was probably installed through some kind of widespread trojan - be it email or compromised website. My favourite is website, because that requires slightly more sophisticated monitoring to do the job properly than an email system, particularly if you give people laptops and let them take the laptop home and connect to their employer through a VPN.

      One of two things is possible from this point:

      1. Hacker was specifically targeting the treasurer's department. Regardless of the methodology you can use, there's only so much you can do against a really determined hacker, and they'll probably never catch the perpetrator unless they made a really basic error.
      2. Keylogger is/was very widespread, and phones home with details of what it's logged on a regular basis. Tie that up with a bit of judicious grepping back home, and you've got a very effective mechanism for finding all sorts of interesting information. The person/team behind this keylogger saw details coming in from a computer owned by a city in California and thought all their Christmases had come at once - access to a public purse which they didn't expect to be very well protected.

      My money's on 2.

    11. Re:Physical Keylogger by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      A physical Key logger ? You mean a keyboard ? yeah we use those a lot , EVERYWHERE.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    12. Re:Physical Keylogger by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, a physical keylogger is a device that plugs in between the keyboard and the PC. Or else it could be build into a keyboard. Here's an example KeyGhost. Of course, since it's a dongle that doesn't transmit anything, you need regular physical access to the device to retrieve memory.

      I think it's main use is to find out if your wife/husband or live in girlfriend/boyfriend is cheating on you, stuff like that. I owuldn't trust it for a sensitive operation like the one described in the article, too easy to discover with routine maintenance.

      One that was built into an identical keyboard would be better in that case.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    13. Re:Physical Keylogger by gilgongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how exactly would having anti-virus or anti-spyware stop things

      Well said! The notion that desktop computing in the Internet age would be problem-free if only everyone installed anti-malware software is completely bogus and doesn't even stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Everyone and is dog runs anti-malware (you can't buy a new PC without the stupid stuff literally flying out of the screen at you the minute you boot it up), and everyone and his dog is hideously infested with malware. Talk about brain-dead commentary!

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  4. Damned politicians by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy. "

    Theft is already illegal, why do we need yet another law? Just enforce the ones we have now!

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Damned politicians by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if they run out of redundant laws to pass they will be out of work.

    2. Re:Damned politicians by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was supposed to be "policy" that applies to a city as opposed to "legislation" that applies to a state. Obviously, they don't have a policy in place to guard their network against key loggers.

    3. Re:Damned politicians by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1
      "The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy. "

      Theft is already illegal, why do we need yet another law? Just enforce the ones we have now!


      How about:

      The City of Carson shall maintain on its computer systems the level of information security required to prevent data loss, data theft, and accidental data disclosure. The City shall, on an annual basis, contract with a qualified third party to conduct an information security audit of the City's computer systems. Effective July 1, 2007.

      That would be a good law/policy/ordinance, no?
      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Damned politicians by Darlantan · · Score: 1

      Because enforcing laws doesn't really _stop_ these kinds of things. Best case is that A) A law makes doing something so inconvenient that it is no longer worth the effort for the payoff, and B) offers a way to lock the criminal up after the fact. Case A isn't likely with this sort of thing, because no law is going to make it prohibitively hard to write a keylogger and get it installed on a number of boxes...especially not $450K worth of extra trouble. Case B might stop the idiots from repeating the crime by putting them into prison, but more likely it would just delay them a bit and weed out the retards.

      Laws don't stop crime, they just provide a means of cleaning up after the fact.

      --
      Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    5. Re:Damned politicians by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be a good law/policy/ordinance, no?

      Yes it is, which is exactly why it'll never happen
    6. Re:Damned politicians by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 1

      So you would call them... dupes? *ducks*

      --
      Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
    7. Re:Damned politicians by nolife · · Score: 1

      Article 4, section 34b

      Do not allow "key logger" or equivalent key tracking software to be installed on network connected computers or terminals.

      Problem solved.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:Damned politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are they assuming the crook is in the USA, never mind even in Nevada? Considering only 5% of the world's population is in the USA, why couldn't the crook be in a country that gives him immunity in a case like this, like, oh, say, Russia (ok, so when he steps on US soil for a conference he's arrested, but until then...)

      The real answer is they need to fix their security. Anything else is like trying to take out an entire population of mosquities with a flyswatter.

    9. Re:Damned politicians by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Laws don't stop crime, they just provide a means of cleaning up after the fact.

      So you're saying that if tomorrow it were no longer illegal to rob people that robberies would not increase? What if it were legal on odd days and illegal on even days? Don't you think more robberies would happen on the odd days?

    10. Re:Damned politicians by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, "piracy" has two definitions:

      1. Armed robbery on the high seas.
      2. Copyright infringement.

      I really, really wish the people writing these stories would bother to at least try to get the jargon right. After all, there's no mention of the word "keylogger", or the fact that it's a really fucking obvious and common attack. I bet they either thought or are trying to pretend that this kind of thing has never happened before...

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    11. Re:Damned politicians by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      unless legislation is a 6'8" black dude (think office linebacker) who runs around smashing the thieves before they install the software, it won't prevent jack shit.

      this kind of idiocy they thinks a law will prevent a crime infuriates me.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    12. Re:Damned politicians by asninn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And also because she wants to get reelected, and for that, she needs to show the Joe Sixpacks who're infuriated now that OMGhackers stole their hard-earned tax dollars that she's doing something.

      Think of it as political security theatre and/or CYA security - it doesn't actually do anything, but it mollifies the mob, and it allows her to point at the newly-passed laws and say "but I did something, you can't blame me!" when the same thing happens again later on.

      --
      butter the donkey
    13. Re:Damned politicians by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      All the opponent has to do is to point out that if she hadn't been browsing porn/warez sites in the first place she wouldn't have got a trojan on her computer.

      Oh and connecting a laptop into the internal coroprate net? In a lot of companies people would get fired on the spot for that, never mind waiting for the next election. Laptops should be *outside* the firewall not inside it.

    14. Re:Damned politicians by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Robbery would be case A where the chance of being caught are high and the payoff is low.

      Deterrence works well in that case. OTOH we still have robberies.. because A doesn't apply in all cases - firstly because the odds change.. stealing a million dollars worth of diamonds using a well planned robbery can seem like a good idea - and also there's the cases of faulty risk assessment (in the case of drug addicts etc.).

      If you think of something like smoking cannabis, which has a low (nearly zero) risk of being caught and no consequences (worst case is the police take your stuff and you have to buy more, at least around here)... they can pass laws all they like and it won't make a difference.

      So now laws by themselves do not stop crime.

    15. Re:Damned politicians by BVis · · Score: 1

      Problem solved.
      Not hardly. That law requires that the reader know what a '"key logger" or equivalent key tracking software' is, what a network is, what software is, and what a computer or terminal is.

      All this information is beyond most private sector workers, and nearly all public servants. While ignorance of the law is not a defense, if the idea is to prevent the crime in the first place, this is a miserable failure. Any attempt by IT personnel (if the city even has them) to educate their workers will be wasted, as you can't teach a state worker anything beyond how to avoid making a decision. (I've worked in state agencies where the workers' union had managed to get its members protection from being compelled to learn anything about computers, lest computer literacy become a job requirement and therefore a reason to lay someone off. I really wish I were making that up.)

      I wish I could suggest a solution. Typically in a case like this in the private sector, someone would be held responsible for the breach (even if it's some scapegoated IT worker who tried to secure the network but was prevented from doing so by beancounters/ignorant executives/office politics) and would lose their job. In the public sector, however, workers have become so adept at the art of CYA that I find it very unlikely that any action will be taken beyond lip service (especially since their constituents only know about "money" and "computer" and instantly set DUMMY_MODE = ON as a result.)

      By the way, what company would fire you for plugging in an outside laptop? I've worked at companies that would require you to bring your OWN laptop because they wouldn't buy one for you. I've worked at (Fortune 500) companies that won't tell their workers not to do anything related to the IT environment, for fear of stifling their creativity. I've worked at companies that wouldn't even take a meeting to explain what spyware was, let alone what to do about it. In a lot of cases my attempts to explain a problem and how to prevent it from occurring again are met with "Oh I don't have to know that." Actively protecting ignorance is how I define "stupid", and there's a lot of stupid people out there.

      It's really a wonder the economy hasn't collapsed, given the unbelieveable ignorance that surrounds these issues.

      (Disclaimer: I work for an anti-malware company, apply grains of salt as desired.)
      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    16. Re:Damned politicians by volpe · · Score: 1

      Theft is already illegal, why do we need yet another law? Just enforce the ones we have now!

      Legislation can do more than simply make something illegal. It can provide additional means of enforcement (e.g. PATRIOT act (I don't like it, but it's an example)), or make it more difficult to commit the crime in the first place (e.g. Brady Bill).

    17. Re:Damned politicians by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Letting an employee have a company windows OSed laptop that they can take home for "work", and to connect to the internet to browse websites is like have sex without a condom; its just asking for trouble. There is a saying, "Keep your tools in the tool box and keep you toys in the toy box."

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    18. Re:Damned politicians by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      All the opponent has to do is to point out that if she hadn't been browsing porn/warez sites in the first place she wouldn't have got a trojan on her computer.
      I think that particular misconception has been cleared here before - not that browsing porn/warez sites won't get you infected, but that you can't get it any other way. I was a network admin, and the largest spyware infection we had was with a weather toolbar which a user downloaded and shared (everyone has local admin privileges here).

      My work doesn't have that much sensitive information (and we use the "default trust" approach with our employees), but, unlike her work, but you could conceivably allow laptops on the corporate net, as long as they pass an audit (that's what we do here). When handling sensitive information / money, I agree there should be a separate network for guests and laptop access.
      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    19. Re:Damned politicians by flynnternet · · Score: 1
      Umm, where I work (as a contract ho', but I have beni's!) everyone has a laptop on the CorpNet that we can take home to VPN back in to get things done off hours. Given, there is anti-virus and firewall SW that is really difficult to turn off, but I regularly use mine to access (reasonable, one has to assume the IE cache is downloaded once one is back on the CorpNet) web-sites. We probably have +500 of these in our OU alone (out of a +45000 system Enterprise AD instance).

      So at least in our Fortune 100 Enterprise, laptops are always allowed inside the FW. Including every VP I've met. Did I mention that all of these laptops are PGP WDEed? (No one wants to end up in the papers, fscks with the stock price.)

      If our Enterprise desktop group (paranoid bastards to a man) think it's an acceptable risk, I have to assume they have done their homework.

      Peace! (Now, damnit...)

      --
      ----------

      I'd buy That (sig) for a Dollar...

  5. 450K ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    450 Kilobytes? Doesn't sound so bad.

    1. Re:450K ? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      It's a keylogger! 450k of passwords is a BUNCH.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    2. Re:450K ? by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Funny

      450K should be enough for anyone!

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  6. And nobody is really immune by dn15 · · Score: 1, Informative

    but it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home.
    You can say that again. But you can't assume you're completely safe even on non-Windows system. A quick search on Mac software sites shows at least one keylogger and surely more are available. I'm sure equivalents exist for Linux, too. This sounds paranoid, yes, but the truth is if *anyone* else has access to your computer, either remotely or physically, there's a chance that everything you type is being recorded.
    1. Re:And nobody is really immune by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that hitting someone with a software keylogger is much harder on a Linux box (especially SE Linux). Last I checked, these usually require some sort of LKM, which has to be installed by the superuser. Getting superuser status from a normal user is much easier on a Windows box.

      As for hardware keyloggers, the best defense is superglue and a policy of checking attached devices after an extended period of time away from the machine.

      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    2. Re:And nobody is really immune by dn15 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out. Good to know. :)

    3. Re:And nobody is really immune by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause jumping su or sudo is so hard.

      I tell ya, sometimes I feel like I should start doing "irresponsible security research" again. At least in the old days people understood the risks because people would yell from the rooftops what was possible (and prove that it was) instead of keeping it all secret so they can sell it to the russians, or, worse yet, the vendors.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:And nobody is really immune by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause jumping su or sudo is so hard.
      Umm.. it is. You need passwords for both of them unless you know about some kind of vulnerability in the version on the machine.
      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    5. Re:And nobody is really immune by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, see, this is why I really should get around to posting to whatever passes as a risks mailing list these days.

      There's about a dozen ways to intercept su or sudo. They range in sophistication from adding an alias to the user's .bash_profile (or whatever shell they are using), to duplicating the effect of gksudo, to using the ptrace api to intercept exec syscalls and replace the command to execute. Some of this stuff is old school and doesn't need repeating.. I'm not aware of anyone who has published a ptrace based mechanism for jumping su or sudo.

      Thing is, hacking is just so much more common than worms or viruses on the Linux platform.. and stuff like this is a last resort for hackers. Only if they don't have a local exploit that will give them root do they turn to stuff like this.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:And nobody is really immune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be young.

    7. Re:And nobody is really immune by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      A quick search on Mac software sites shows at least one keylogger and surely more are available.

      Well duh. Recording the keystrokes is not the hard part. It's getting it installed that's the challenge.

    8. Re:And nobody is really immune by dn15 · · Score: 1

      The idea is if anyone else has access to your computer it's entirely possible and not that difficult to set up some kind of eavesdropping. If someone nefarious has physical access to your computer, all bets are off unless your OS is stored on a read-only device. And even then there certainly would be ways to do it via a pass-through device your keyboard could be plugged into.

    9. Re:And nobody is really immune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used logkey.kext i think it is called for the mac.
      works like a charm.

    10. Re:And nobody is really immune by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      You searched for keystroke loggers for other platforms, found some, and then concluded "nobody is immune." So clearly you thought that fact was important. When that silly notion was dispelled you're coming up with another one - that physical access makes it possible to eavesdrop.

      Well that's another big duh.

  7. Fscking dumb by kosmosik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > but it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated
    > on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home.

    No. It drives the importance on controlling the flow of public money. If one person be it a president of California or what you call him, can make significant money transfers that are not audited and open that is something wrong with your system. Yes you fscking can make that bank *calls* you to approve any transfer above some ammount. Yes you can make that public transfers are open and visible.

    So it is nothing to blame about the software since it is obvious that Windows in hands of non-technical people is insecure. The person making transfers should use different laptop perhaps? The one that IT department cares of not the one that he browses pron from?

    It is just an example how retarded and uneucated people who have power to spend public money are.

    1. Re:Fscking dumb by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would rather it drives home the importance of controlling any flow of money. Say someone gets ahold of my online banking password. They should only have the ablitlity to transfer money from checking to savings or perhaps pay my cable bill. They should not be able to transfer it to an account that isn't one of my accounts with the same bank. They shouldn't be able to set themselves up as a payee able to recieve electronic payments from my account. They should be able to transfer funds to a different bank. Sure it might be slightly less convienent for me to have to go to the bank in person with ID in order to add a new payee, or to make a transfer to a different bank, but it seems a small price to pay for that security. I should be more worried about a keylogger screwing up my e-mail than emptying my bank account. This shouldn't be that tough folks.

      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:Fscking dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should not be able to transfer it to an account that isn't one of my accounts with the same bank. They shouldn't be able to set themselves up as a payee able to recieve electronic payments from my account.

      Why not? Why shouldn't I be able to transfer money to my wife or daughter's account? Why shoudn't I be able to add my new credit card as a payee?

      If my bank made me get off my lazy ass, drive all the way downtown, pay exhorbitant parking rates, and wait in line just to add a new payee, I would be very pissed and give the bank a lot of shit, and look for a new bank.

    3. Re:Fscking dumb by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      It is possible here where I live (Poland). But I guess such account conditions imply some additional costs.

    4. Re:Fscking dumb by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Better yet, logs of public money transfers could be made available for anyone to scrutinize, thus catching things like this. Oh, wait, that'd also catch things like this where the thief is also a public official, so I guess this isn't such a viable idea after all.

    5. Re:Fscking dumb by icknay · · Score: 1

      Actually making your general purpose computer secure is quite hard. What this shows is that we should have a little USB doohicky with a little display and a couple buttons that we use to sign/authenticate important transactions. For the final step of the transaction, you look at the display on the device and enter your pin on the device to confirm the transaction. The hardware for this is not that expensive, but the banking system has such organizational inertia, it's going to take them years to clue in to just send/sell the customer a device. You just cannot "secure" the whole PC with the confidence that you can for the little USB device.

      We'll all have them someday! You heard it here first! I am not a crazy old man!

    6. Re:Fscking dumb by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Banks should, at a minimum, use virtual keyboards that you have to operate with a mouse as part of the login process. Yes, it's possible to get screen captures of where the mouse is clicking but it's quite a lot harder to do than keylogging. Smart card logins and RSA number generator cards are another option. Banks have been way too slow to adopt them.

      Second, there's a whole range of things you can do to prevent dodgy payees being added to an account. I know of one bank here in Australia that sends you an SMS to confirm new payees. Certainly, big transfers to new payees should be setting off alarm bells somewhere. I've received a couple of calls from my bank to authorise foreign transfers before. It ain't rocket science.

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    7. Re:Fscking dumb by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the nonprofit school that I'm on the board of, our policy is that anything over a certain amount must be approved and signed by multiple officers, up to all four main officers for really large amounts.

      What kind of idiot sets up a financial system for a city (that deals with a lot more money that we ever will) in which one user can on their own authority transfer over a quarter of a million dollars to a random bank account? Whoever the controller for the city is should probably be fired at this point.

      Even if you have an electronic system, it's WAY more secure to require multiple approvals. For a really large amount, why not pay someone a wage for the five minutes it takes to verify it with authorized individuals?

      Think about it. If the guy who installed the keylogger can do this, what would stop the treasurer themselves from doing it at any time, since they apparently have the ability to transfer all the money they want to whomever they want? Or an IT person with even easier access to their computer?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    8. Re:Fscking dumb by narf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That describes my bank (a credit union) pretty darn well!

    9. Re:Fscking dumb by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      you know how hard it is to manage the rsa tokens and the smart cards ? I use them here and daily we get people who have to call out to have the things resynch witht the servers.

      The banks are financial institutes at their finest , they don't want to pay out money if they don't have to. And supporting that is pure loss for them.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
  8. There is no way to protect yourself by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Insightful

    it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home. Uhh, no. If the keylogging software is some off the shelf crap, sure, that might work, but if it is something the attacker has written specifically for this attack, forget it. We don't live in a world where software is assured. You can't ever say "my keystrokes are on a secure path". Although, two factor security things like RSA's Secureid can help.
    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:There is no way to protect yourself by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      E*Trade offers the RSA number generator as an option for their accounts. I held off for a while but then I found myself needing to login to E*Trade while I was travelling. That convinced me I needed to get it. How many other financial institutions offer these?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  9. why is this even happening to begin with by wizardforce · · Score: 0, Redundant

    how is it that one person has the contyrol over the entire cash flow of the city anyways? are they really spending enough cash that it is just too inconvenient for more than one person's authentication? for that matter, why is it that they even needed to login/withdraw cash from anywhere but their central location? cash on the go?

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  10. Ob: Princess Bride. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You have six fingers on your right hand. Someone is looking for you."

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  11. Curses by rossz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I would have gotten away with it if it weren't for those pesky kids and their stupid dog!

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Curses by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Meddling kids.

  12. Because laws sure do _prevent_ things... by Darlantan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy.

    Yeah, because laws sure do stop those criminals from, you know, breaking the law.

    When are politicians going to wise up and realize that laws don't stop criminals from doing anything, they just offer a means of punishing them _if_ they get caught after the fact? Completely different methods are required to prevent these kind of things -- like proper security procedures, in this case.

    --
    Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    1. Re:Because laws sure do _prevent_ things... by punkrockguy318 · · Score: 1

      Of course! If you don't like something, just illegalize it. It sure as hell has worked for drugs and underage drinking...

    2. Re:Because laws sure do _prevent_ things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know what kind of legislation she's talking about.
      Might be something to make replay attacks via keyloggers difficult, such as making the use of two factor ID mandatory for financial systems.

    3. Re:Because laws sure do _prevent_ things... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because laws sure do stop those criminals from, you know, breaking the law.
      Yes, but if you didn't have the law in the first place, they wouldn't be doing anything criminal, and without the deterrent effect you'd (potentially) have everyone with a computer trying to crack everything everywhere, just for fun, with no comebacks.

      I'd say that the main reason more people don't rob banks is because of the risk of getting caught and spending 15 years in prison.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. Hardware Loggers by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I'm sure equivalents exist for Linux, too.

    They also exist for PS/2 and USB too, so the OS doesn't have to even know about it.

    Many are so discrete even an IT tech might not notice them.

    I've heard there are even some for Windows that can be programmed to inject keypresses.

    Hopefully I'm OK typing on my laptop's integrated keyboard here. ..>./ No you're not, ha, ha ./..,;,

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Hardware Loggers by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Funny

      They also exist for PS/2 and USB too, so the OS doesn't have to even know about it.
      Just use a wireless keyboard and you're completely immune to physical keyloggers.
    2. Re:Hardware Loggers by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Just use a wireless keyboard and you're completely immune to physical keyloggers.

      I actually know nothing about Bluetooth line crypto, but assuming it's any good, having a paired device might not be a bad idea.

      Who modded you Troll?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Hardware Loggers by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why I was modded Troll, but oddly enough, when I posted it I was thinking "Somebody isn't going to have their sarcasm detector turned on and is going to mod this down."

      I was actually using a Bluetooth keyboard (Logitech MX5000 desktop, hopefully newer runs of it have fixed the issues I have) when I posted, so I was wondering how good the encryption is and how easily someone could intercept and decipher the signals.

  14. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Armed with a spyware program, the thieves tracked Avilla's moves on her laptop and obtained bank passwords


    Antivirus/antispyware might not stop a physical keylogger, but that wasn't the problem here.
  15. Well, well... by GFree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If only the treasury had been using Vista, at least someone would have been to blame for clicking "Accept". In this case no-one could admit ignorance by saying the keylogger just slipped through the net; SOMEONE would have had to click that damn button.

    God I'm going to hell for writing that, and I'm a Linux user.

    1. Re:Well, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be better to have them moved to Linux instead. Then again the UAC is like putting your signature down for something - you'll get the blame if things totally fuck up. Still should never have happened, especially with a Government department.

    2. Re:Well, well... by k31bang · · Score: 1

      If only the treasury had been using Vista, at least someone would have been to blame for clicking "Accept". In this case no-one could admit ignorance by saying the keylogger just slipped through the net; SOMEONE would have had to click that damn button.


      Of course not all keyloggers are software based. Such as this one: http://www.keyghost.com/
      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    3. Re:Well, well... by webweave · · Score: 1

      Well, from what I've seen of Vista in action when most users are confronted with the message "Running this program will install a keyloger that will comprimise your security and turn your banking passwords over to organized chrime" will have them slapping that "Accept" button even before all the text has time to render to the screen.

      The article does not say what the compromised system was running but I guess if it weren't windows then it whould be news.

      Keyloggers would become useless for passwords theives if the password entry had another question that changed and would be inserted into the password eg. "What are the first three characters of your password, day you were born, last five characters of your passwd. Or a combination of of entering characters off the keyboard and clicking on them with a mouse or both.

    4. Re:Well, well... by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      If only the treasury had been using Vista, at least someone would have been to blame for clicking "Accept". In this case no-one could admit ignorance by saying the keylogger just slipped through the net; SOMEONE would have had to click that damn button. That damn Accept button will be the ultimate CYA for Microsoft.

      Vista asks you so many times (if you do interesting stuff, at least), that you have to either disable the UAC or pressing "Accept" will become a reflex. Of course, I don't use Vista, I only install and troubleshoot it, so my view is skewed (you won't have to press Accept to use Word too often).
      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  16. Keyboard technology by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Just shows that keyboard technology will have to change to prevent this sort of problem. The devices are harder to produce for USB keyboards than PS/2 style as you need to understand the USB/HID protocol.

    1. Re:Keyboard technology by Nonesuch · · Score: 1

      gilesjuk writes: Just shows that keyboard technology will have to change to prevent this sort of problem. The devices are harder to produce for USB keyboards than PS/2 style as you need to understand the USB/HID protocol.
      Actually, the article says that the compromise happened on a laptop, which implies a software keylogger, not a device -- the software loggers tap into the keyboard events in the OS, so it doesn't matter how the keyboard is plugged in.


      I recently noticed Thinkgeek is now offering the "KeyPhantom" USB keylogger for $199.99.

      I would think that it'd be easier to implement a hardware key logger for USB, as USB "hubs" are truly "hubs", so it should be possible to capture the cleartext keystrokes by "sniffing" on any device attached to the same USB bus, instead of having to be inline like traditional hardware PS/2 "Key Katcher" type loggers.

  17. I would have gotten away with it... by Tatarize · · Score: 3, Funny

    if it wasn't for you meddling kids.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  18. Have the bank call to verify by caller9 · · Score: 1

    Just to echo a previous poster, the solution here is human. Even if you can create the transfer batch identically to the method used by the victim. The bank should sit on their hands until they call an authorized person and verify the amount of the transaction. If your payroll suddenly doubles, you might want to check into it. From the detail-sparse article it sounded like an unscheduled transfer anyway. It looks like they have no human interaction between bank and city. Freakin Kalamazoo was a nice touch though, hilarious.

    The real problem would've been if they were smart enough to create a payroll entry for a non-existant employee and have it direct deposit somewhere. Hopefully this would be caught when a check stub for "John Smith" sat in a desk in the fake employees department and anyone with a clue noitced they hadn't handed it out...and for that matter didn't know John Smith.

    Regardless the $90K should've been a red flag if they were actually getting confirmation calls from the bank.

    To work around the confirmation call you'd need a mole high enough in the hierarchy to confirm the call or someone at the bank. Said person better flee quickly because they've put their name all over it.

  19. Of course we need more legislation - that'll work. by Boricle · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:

    The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy.

    * sigh *

    Because people who would try and steal some $450,000 are going to be stopped by legislation making it even more illegal.

    Maybe something like two factor authentication would be better? That way different numbers are needed every time. And better security on the laptop perhaps? Non administrator priviliges. Not allowing people to install software? All quite doable.

    Sure, blame the criminals, but maybe the doors should be bolted too?

  20. unsecured terminal? by proadventurer · · Score: 1
    "The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy. "

    Yup, now that she has pleanty of time on her hands since she has been FIRED!

    --
    I hate slashdot
    1. Re:unsecured terminal? by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

      If the Treasurer is elected, he or she can't be fired - they can only be impeached. They are a law unto themselves, as bad as judges.

  21. I've found keylogger cache files by spywhere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before I 'retired' to fix home PCs, I was the alpha geek on a Help Desk.
    A guy called, infested with spyware... I started poking around, and found a text file. Before I continued, I called the Help Desk manager over, and put the client on speaker:

    "Um, sir, do you bank at Bank of America?"
    "Yeah, why?"
    "Is your password 'Snoopy67'?"

    Since then, I've found a few dozen files with clear-text keylogger yields... and thousands of log files filled with coded stuff that could be anything.

    1. Re:I've found keylogger cache files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Key points in this post:

      Before I 'retired'....

      and

      "Um, sir, do you bank at Bank of America?" ..

    2. Re:I've found keylogger cache files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably more key:

      "and put the client on speaker"

      "Is your password 'Snoopy67'?"

      Why? Oh,why? Oh,why?

    3. Re:I've found keylogger cache files by frostband · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Um, sir, do you bank at Bank of America?"
      "Yeah, why?"
      "Is your password 'Snoopy67'?"
      "No. It's the same as my luggage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5."

    4. Re:I've found keylogger cache files by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Snoopy76? That's the combination on my luggage!

    5. Re:I've found keylogger cache files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy called, infested with spyware

      Spyware can infest people now?! Hollywood was right!

  22. Re:Not everything is shit like M$. AV==Snake Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an elitist idiot. Get out of mom's basement and into the real world and see how the IT world really works, as it's obvious you have no clue.

  23. Re:Not everything is shit like M$. AV==Snake Oil by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    Saying that GNU/Linux and Mac have the same problems Windoze does is a serious insult. I'm tired of hearing people tell me how much my OS needs an antivirus and spyware checker.


    It's bullshit anyway. The pros can get through anything. Starting off with an OS that 99% of script kiddies can't own is a much better option than dragging down your computer's performance with snake oil. An OS like Debian, without Flash and other useless and insecure junk, is more appropriate for an office than Windoze with it's IE, Outlook and WMP burden. After that, AV can be done for mail servers and intrusion detection at the network level. Everything else is just so much busy work and waste of money.


    While I will agree with you that Windows is fundamentally less secure than GNU/Linux||BSD haven't you ever heard of "Defense in Depth"?

    Yes, AV can be done for mail servers, and hell also on proxy servers. But how do you protect against the user in room 314 with a USB Memory key that he likes to use? you need AV on individual systems (I like ClamAV for *nix, but that's my personal choice)
    Intrusion Detection at the network level, brilliant, and a useful tool, but not enough. How do you detect changes to important files on a local host? your NIDS isn't going to help you, a Host IDS might (Tripwire ring a bell?)
    Not only that, but you still have to perform regular audits to ensure that the systems are working properly. You also have to review the logs.

    It's all about Layers! there is no "Magic Bullet"
    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  24. hmmm by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    They get us in so many ways. There's got to be a way for us to get them."

    Well, yall can start by getting your heads our of your asses and implementing a descent security program, including limiting employees' access to their workstations..

  25. Digg is looking good now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought I'd say this, but after reading through some of the comments in recent Digg threads about Microsoft, I actually think Digg is getting better and Slashdot is going to hell. Why is this tripe allowed to float up to the default page view?

  26. Yes, but by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Nobody is immune from either Flu or Ebola. And yet, I know which one I am going to be concerned about.

    The simple fact is, that Windows IS easier to hit. And until the security tightens up, it will remain that way. *nix has decent security in it (due to a good initial design and years of work to get it right).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Yes, but by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The simple fact is, that Windows IS easier to hit. And until the security tightens up, it will remain that way.

      How do you suggest they "tighten" it up ?

      *nix has decent security in it (due to a good initial design and years of work to get it right).

      Seems you don't know your history.

    2. Re:Yes, but by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know it very well. Unix had a good design from the git-go; Basically, an add-on compentent approach. Security was not really part of it, but it was fairly mallable to it. Unlike Windows which was originally a new version of VMS, it was still too tightly designed and built (and I have seen the windows 3.51 code while working at HP; a side team ported to PA-Risc). Unix's minimum and sparseness allowed for relatively easy changes to be bolted on, and later to be added into the kernel. I no longer know the inner code of windows, but I have friends that work at MS. They tell me that vista is better than XP, but it still sux.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  27. Re:Not everything is shit like M$. AV==Snake Oil by dn15 · · Score: 1

    Saying that GNU/Linux and Mac have the same problems Windoze does is a serious insult. I'm tired of hearing people tell me how much my OS needs an antivirus and spyware checker.

    That is far from what was intended in my (the grandparent) post. I think you read in between the lines and found something that wasn't supposed to be there. Despite what you may think, I was not implying that Linux and Mac systems "have the same problems" as Windows. That is an absurd statement. Perhaps I should have spelled it out and ended my first sentence with "if you run Windows" but I thought that goes without saying in a community like Slashdot.

    Believe it or not, I actually agree with everything you said. In the original post I simply intended to say that any computer could fall victim to a keylogger, whatever the platform and whatever the status of your antivirus and antispyware protection. And you should absolutely use those things... if you run Windows. ;)

  28. Non free is just screwed. by twitter · · Score: 1

    While I will agree with you that Windows is fundamentally less secure than GNU/Linux||BSD haven't you ever heard of "Defense in Depth"?

    Sure, and that's what's needed. The easiest way to start it to throw the Windoze out and end the monoculture. Defense in depth starts with a diverse OS install that makes the whole 0wnership game that much more difficult and less profitable.

    Most of the Windoze problems are problems of obnoxious non free software that get in the way of real security. Complex licensing and install mechanisms, bloat and ancient codebases are all detrimental. M$ admins run themselves silly keeping up with "patches" AV updates and other completely ineffective "products" sold to them by people who'd like to keep them in the dark about real security. Even if they could get their heads out of that, applying reasonable tools in a M$ shop is next to impossible. Vista takes up 15 GB of disk space, before you add anything useful to it, most of it designed to keep the user from "stealing" songs. How the hell do you audit that? We all know that hype about improved performance and security is going to be worth just as much as the XP hype was - the non free codebase remains as crusty as it ever was. Recovery in the non free world, thanks to licensing and install methods are a huge pain. In the free world, you can use A/V on detection to disinfect user files and simply wipe the binaries out often remotely. People in the non free world are screwed from start to finish. Even if the had the tools to identify all of the spyware and viruses, they don't have manpower to fix the problem or the time to learn how.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  29. New Laws Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy. "

    It shall be a Class I felony to fail to protect a computer containing confidential information is such a manner that an unauthorized third party can gain access to the information or that the computer itself can be stolen. If it is not possible to determine the specific employee who should have safeguarded the confidential information or hardware, any corporate officer will be held accountable.

    It's more effective to punish the inept employees and management than the perpetrators; at least you'll get rid of a lot of the deadwood and motivate the people who can be most effective in fixing the problem of lax security and "I don't give a shit" attitudes about safeguarding confidential information.

  30. Except that... by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    ... it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware ...

    Congress wants to pass a law that would make spy-ware legal.

    (IIRC, it is HR 950 - the "CAN SPY ACT". There was a /. post about it a few weeks back, but too hard to use PDA to search while riding on a bus.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  31. $hit $hit $hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    $aying that GNU/Linux and Mac have the $ame problem$ Windows doe$ i$ a $eriou$ in$ult. I'm tired of hearing people tell me how much my O$ need$ an antiviru$ and $pyware checker.

    It'$ bull$hit anyway. The pro$ can get through anything. $tarting off with an O$ that 99% of $cript kiddie$ can't own i$ a much better option than dragging down your computer'$ performance with $nake oil. An O$ like Debian, without Fla$h and other u$ele$$ and in$ecure junk, i$ more appropriate for an office than Windows with it'$ IE, Outlook and WMP burden. After that, AV can be done for mail $erver$ and intru$ion detection at the network level. Everything el$e i$ ju$t $o much bu$y work and wa$te of money.

  32. Who Uses Online Banking? by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 0

    Does anyone here actually use online banking? If you do, aren't you worried about your account being compromised? What measures do you take to address the numerous security issues?

    Personally, there's no way I'd sign up for online banking, there's just too much risk. I prefer to either visit my bank in person or (rarely) speak to someone at the bank over the phone. I understand that the phone is also risky, but I figure that there's much more risk for an attacker since there will be a record of from where the call was placed.

    I do place quite a few orders online using my credit card, but that's because it offers some legal protections, like only being responsible for the first $50 of a fraudulent charge.

    1. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by proadventurer · · Score: 1

      I online bank and in 3 years have never changed my password. I don't log in from internet cafes or anything. My bank says I am covered no matter what. Other than not changing my password I have good security. I use a Mac on an IP filter and wep network and ND magnet my old hard drives. As a general rule I don't give out my bank info to anyone from Nigeria, the only banking thing that I do that bothers me is I have a paypal account that connects to my bank account and that kinda gives me the creeps.

      --
      I hate slashdot
    2. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by k3vlar · · Score: 1

      I use online banking too, without any problems. I've even logged on to their secure site from my PDA on an unencrypted network at a bus terminal to transfer some money so I could afford a bus ticket home. Technology to the rescue!

      I've never changed my password either, and just like the other sibling post, the paypal account that's tied into my bank account also gives me the creeps, but it's still useful, and it's actually saved my ass on a botched ebay auction. (Paypal refunded me when the seller screwed up.)

      A recent login to my bank's site yielded a prompt for more security information. I was prompted to select 5 questions, such as "What is your favorite chocolate bar?" and was told that they would occasionally ask me to answer them. My biggest complaint is they do not allow passwords longer than 8 characters. I guess it's either their encryption doesn't support it, or they have problems with people forgetting long passwords. Please, let me choose them if I want!

      --
      Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
    3. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

      You can mark me as mildly "data paranoid" but I still use on-line banking and on-line access to my 401K. I'm on cable modem - behind a router that I've changed the admin psswd - and either on a Mac or a Linux system also both running SW firewalls. And rarely I've used my XP-Pro system to do such stuff - but am in the final stages of moving all my stuff to Mac / Linux. And since I'm a security nut I'm a very good security system on the PC and its always up to date.

      But I'm also a technology professional - so all this is normal / natural for me. For the rest of the 90% plus of people who don't know squat about the basics of how to be minimally secure - this case underscores the point that you can have computer security in place - but if you ignore it - don't update it - change the settings - etc. Then you are a prime target - especially if you are a prime target like an account manager etc.

      --
      Its not the years, its the mileage .....
    4. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by Pym · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that people who are wary of online banking (not necessarily the OP here) seem to have no problem handing their credit card to the waitor and letting them walk out of sight with it. Much less expertise needed to steal that one!

    5. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      The only banking thing that I do that bothers me is I have a paypal account that connects to my bank account and that kinda gives me the creeps.
      I would never, ever pay with a Paypal bank account simply because of their wretched customer service. Twice I have clicked on the option "Pay with xx credit card", and Paypal immediately payed with my bank account. Now, this account was an empty one, so the payment immediately hit as an over-draft. Hours of speaking with customer service reps netted me nothing : they continually claim I messed up choosing my transaction, and the web software could not have been faulty. I know this is not the case, however, because the second time it happened I was extremely careful. It wasn't worth more than a few hours arguing however to avoid the $20 or whatever overdraft charges. Addressing the broader question, no, I never use online banking in any form. I have never had the need, and credit cards work just fine for paying over the internet. I understand most bank accounts have protection on them, but there's _always_ customer service delays, the possibility of them refusing to cover an incident, etc. Bottom line: when someone places fraudulent charges on your credit card, you have not lost any money yet. You have all the time in the world to resolve the problem, because you still control your funds. If someone takes money from your account, you have lost your money, and now must wait for the bank to resolve the problem. Which situation do you prefer?
    6. Re:Who Uses Online Banking? by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      Damn, second post and I figured out some formatting, but it looks like I need to force line breaks. Sorry for the block of text.

  33. More legislation? by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

    The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy.


    This doesn't bode well. What they need are some secure computing practices. Legislation won't prevent this, especially when the person lives outside her jurisdiction which happens to be most of the world.
    1. Re:More legislation? by wimmi · · Score: 1

      What if the legislation mandates better computer security and personal responsibility? (employee is accountable when (s)he tampers with the office-laptop or loses USB-stick filled with goverment-data.)

      I'd vote for a law like that. it's even good for business - computer security can really become a decent profession.

  34. What did he say that was wrong? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    He said that Linux does not suffer the same nor as many issues as MS. You attack him and say that he lives in parents basement, telling him to see the real world? So what is in the real world? ALL of the MS systems that I see are running AV and there are still daily attacks against MS. OTH, I have not seen ANY of the *nix boxes cracked. I have seen security compromised when somebody obtained a login/password from a cracked Windows system, but that is not the same. All in all, he is more in the real world that you ACs are.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:What did he say that was wrong? by MicklePickle · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree with this. I am the senior sysadmin for 120+ UNIX servers. That's just two people managing 120+ servers. There's 8 people managing roughly the same number of Windows boxes. The Windows guys install spyware programs, anti-keyloggers, windows defender, anti-virus, yabbida, yabbida. We don't. Why bother? We do however run security scanners periodically, because we have users logging in to those boxes and we don't trust them.

      --
      -- main(s){printf(s="main(s){printf(s=%c%s%c,34,s,34) ;}",34,s,34);} $p='$p=%c%s%
  35. Thats it? by denttford · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just 450K? Meh, post it when they steal at least a couple hundred megabytes.

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  36. morons by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck do they think anti-malware software is the answer?

    Three words: Hardware key logger.

    Fools and their money are soon parted.

    --

    Question everything

  37. It just goes to prove the old saying, no one will ever need more than 640k...

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  38. 450K of passwords should be enough for anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My luggage has that many passwords.

  39. Re:Not everything is shit like M$. AV==Snake Oil by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps I should have spelled it out and ended my first sentence with "if you run Windows" but I thought that goes without saying in a community like Slashdot.

    I can only read what you write. Mind reading is something I gave up long ago, it just never worked.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  40. lol by pestilence669 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legislation that could prevent this kind of computer piracy."

    Yeah... more "rules" against this kind of behavior will fix it. It's not illegal enough... that's the reason it happens. Criminals care about consequences. Dumb ass.

  41. Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in... Pink Elephant Doesn't Steal Gazillion Dollars From Dead President.

    I love it when things not happening classify as news.

  42. Will not be enough. by gweihir · · Score: 1

    With physical access, you can put a hardware keylogger into the cable. Or into the keyboard. Or into the computer. The keyboard is probably safest, since who opens a keyboard? I do it once a year to clean it, but that is it.

    Then there is current research on doing audio-keylogging (by recognizing the individual key-sounds), and that seems to work reasonably well. There is Tempest monitoring for the keyboard. This one is a bit more effort, not because the signal is weak, but it is not too suitable for conventional receivers. Works for the key-matrix and the cable. There are doubtless many other options.

    The easisest thing at the moment is probably to build your own keylogger software and use it sparingly. That way its signature will not get into the typically used malware detectors.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Will not be enough. by Devil_Hack · · Score: 1

      Then there is current research on doing audio-keylogging (by recognizing the individual key-sounds), and that seems to work reasonably well. We had a project at uni last year where you had to do exactly that. There were 2 teams, one of my friends was in one. It's really not that easy and it doesn't work all that great. The idea is indeed simple, but you get in all sorts of trouble when you press the keys harder or you use a different keyboard or ... Their program recognized about 5-8 keys reliably and even then... Besides, you'd run into trouble in case the password you're trying to steal is actually decent, because how would you know if certain characters are numbers or punctuation symbols? I guess you could see if the shift button was being held, but then you'd also have to see when it wasn't held anymore. There's a lot of problems associated with this kind of "audio"-keylogging and it's certainly tenfold times easier to create a regular keylogger.
  43. Re:Hold the (head) Phones! by Hucko · · Score: 1

    Someone mail this to the treasurer! These test will prevent key logging by the ole distract em trick!

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  44. twitter is just screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, and that's what's needed. The easiest way to start to start it to throw the Twitter out and end the monoculture. Defense in depth starts with a diverse user base that makes the whole 0wnership game that much more difficult and less profitable. Most of the Slashdot problems are problems of obnoxious free software supporters that get in the way of real content. Complex GPL3 licensing and hippie ideals, bloat and support of ancient BSD/UNIX codebases are all detrimental. twitter run himself silly keeping up with kernel "patches", point released updates and other completely ineffective "products" sold to them by slashdot posters who'd like to keep him in the dark about real security. Even if he could get his head out of that, applying reasonable tools in twitter's mom's basement is next to impossible. twitter's text file copies of GPL license takes up 15 GB of disk space, before you add anything useful to it, most of it designed to keep the user from "stealing" source. How the hell do you audit that? We all know that hype about improved performance and security is going to be worth just as much as the Linux 2.6 hype was - the free codebase remains as incompatible as it ever was. Recovery in the free world, thanks to licensing and install methods are a huge pain. In the non-free world, you can use A/V on detection to disinfect user files and simply wipe the binaries out often remotely. People in twitter's world are screwed from start to finish. Even if the had the tools to identify all of the problems with his theories, they don't have manpower to fix the problem or the time to teach him.

  45. Systems being used from home? by timpaton · · Score: 1

    drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home.

    If I don't keep good updated security software on my home computer, somebody will steal six figure amounts from me?

    I'd like to see them try. Blood, stone and all that.

  46. awww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >a serious insult.

    Look everybody, twitter is insulted...

  47. Security Consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many "security consultants" will now deluge the city of Carson's IT department with solutions for their problems? Really, you have to feel sorry for the IT department, they had a VIP enduser, who took her laptop outside of their network where it was most likely was infected. Perhaps now they can get something in their budget, so this doesn't happen again.

  48. Stupid by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

    How about keeping vital systems off the interwebs? Jesus H. Christ.

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
  49. My god, the simplest things... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies and Secret Service investigators try to track down the crooks, Carson has fielded calls from officials worried about the security of municipal coffers. "They want to know how they can prevent this," Avilla said.

    I know it's not going to fix anything, but there are a few simple, simple steps:

    1. Linux. If you can't make that work, get a Mac, but really, do give Linux some serious consideration. Especially if you can standardize on things in the normal repositories, you basically kill any equivalent of the most common and easiest Windows attack vectors.
    2. Never let it out of your sight. If it's a desktop, it stays in a room that only you and trusted people have access to, like your office. When you're not there, lock the door. If it's a laptop, either keep it locked in a similar room, or carry it with you. If you MUST let it out of your sight, get one of those stupid-looking laptop locks and lock it to something solid. When you get back, check for tampering.
    3. Don't let anyone have unlimited access to it. If someone MUST use your computer, every time they touch it, it should be under some limited account, not yours. When they're done, nuke the account. And again, be in the room, paying enough attention that you'll notice if they try to open the case or unplug anything.
    4. Lock it down. Linux/Mac is part of the above, but even if you MUST use Windows, turn on the firewall, download some good, free antivirus and antispyware (and pay for some if you can't get it free, due to many of the "free" ones being free only for home use), and turn off AutoRun, even if you never plan to play music CDs. You could go farther, too -- on Mac/Windows, BitLocker/FileVault. On Linux, you could encrypt the entire disk except your boot partition, and you could put that on a removable flash thumbdrive. You could also use SELinux, which, on a distro that supports it, is complete overkill even for this -- every process has a set of rules defining what it can and cannot do.
    5. Use a secure browser, which basically means anything except IE. If you're on Vista, maybe IE 7, but I still prefer open source. And even then, disable crap you don't need, run Flash on a per-page click-to-play basis, and pay very close attention to the URLs you visit when accessing your bank.
    6. Use at least two-factor authentication. A thumbprint reader, a smartcard reader, or even a simple thumb-drive with a keyfile on it.
    7. Don't be stupid with passwords. Don't give them out for chocolate (has happened before). It is not enough to name it after your dog and add a year, your Fido1993 will be cracked in two minutes with a dictionary cracker, if you even bothered to capitalize the F. Make it hard enough that you have to write it down, and then make sure where you write it is sufficiently protected -- for example, on something in your pocket, or have the browser remember on that encrypted hard drive. (The encrypted drive, of course, will always have the same password, and that should be a hard one that you bite the bullet and memorize anyway. Or a very-obfuscated one that you can remember, for example, 2b||!2b could read "To be or not to be" (to a programmer), but beware that being predictable (such as pulling it out of my Slashdot comment) can make hard obfuscation easy.)

    This is common sense stuff. Some of it is a bit tinfoil-hat (SELinux, secure hardware), but really, most of the above can be done very cheaply, and in the long run, won't take any significant amount of time or brainpower to maintain.

    And though I've never been a cracker, it still pisses me off when, instead of responding by paying attention to common-sense security (as I've just described), they'll attempt to buy a magic bullet -- they'll buy ONE product, probably something standard like Windows Defender, and then get lazy again. Or sometimes they'll try litigation, or both:

    The treasurer said she is now determined to try to write legi

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:My god, the simplest things... by unick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot: 8. Do not re-use passwords. Of the gazzilion profiles I needed to create on the web there are not 2 with the same password. Use a "system" that will help remember the password, e.g.: fixed password + website acronym + another fixed password. I.e. 'foohmbar' as a password for hotmail, 'foogmbar' for gmail, etc. Or any other system that suits you.

    2. Re:My god, the simplest things... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I would say, be aware of where you're re-using passwords. The reason not to re-use a password is to prevent a compromise of one account on one site leading to a compromise of another account on another site -- and that compromise may come from inside.

      For example, I really don't give a damn if MySpace can get into my free New York Times account, but that's basically what using the same password on both implies -- if someone 0wns MySpace, or MySpace itself becomes corrupt, they can get my password and use it elsewhere.

      But, for example, my passwords to my bank account, or to various other things that I actually care about, are entirely unique. And most of my access to things I care about (remote servers that I admin) is done with SSH keys instead of passwords.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  50. Social Engineering by jasonwea · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated ...

    Anti-malware software can only do so much. The real solution is to educate users so they are not vulnerable to social engineering attacks such as "OMG SMILIES FOR YOUR EMAIL", "I need to verify your username and password" and various other ways users are conned into having their boxes rooted and/or their passwords exposed.

    Of course locking down corporate workstations is a very good idea. No admin access and a splash of group policies here and there does wonders at keeping the users away from things they can shoot their feet with.

  51. Hw can this happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone is able to steal my username _and_ password for my bank account he may be able to _look_ into my account but still not able to draw money from it. He does not have access to the TAN one need to authorize the transfer. Even changing the way the TAN is provided would be visible for me.
    I'm Dutch and have a Dutch bank account :-)

  52. How did you get that software in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacked root? Well, why do you need to hack sudo then?

    If you run SELinux or the personality module you need to hack the account (unused otherwise) that controls the personality mode to get root to do anything other than what root has been allowed to. Or it can be locked down that root cannot do this. You'll now need to work out what user account can do what nefarious deed you need and hack that account.

    1. Re:How did you get that software in there? by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      First , how many small counties offices are running linux let alone SE ? These places get by on using the most common stuff they can find. To make it easy on the city worker.

      These folks run MS and fail to apply security updates , do you really think they will run updates on a linux box ? A badly patched linux box is much more dangerous then windows boxen that are not patched. A linux box you can control much more of the box then an MS box. It just happens with having more control over the platform there is more that can be done with it. Linux is a superior platform in that respect and that makes it more dangerous.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
  53. Meh, happy endings suck.. by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    These "disaster avoided" stories are numbingly boring. Wake me up when money actually gets transferred and there are dead dogs and crying executives in the streets. This is America, people, home of the kiss-kiss-bang-bang, for crying out loud. Please gauge your notion of "news" accordingly.

    PS: Just curious: how would it be possible to transfer 450mil out of a bank and go undetected? How are these big things pulled off?

  54. YAY WINDOWS! by toby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mircosfot make great benefit to nation America!

    --
    you had me at #!
  55. California should just outlaw the root problem by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Since the state thinks that legislation can be used to solve all their problem there are just 2 things they need to outlaw: ignorance and stupidity. I sure it would be just as effective as creating new laws covering crimes that are already covered by other laws.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  56. ha ha. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    twitter run himself silly keeping up with kernel "patches", point released updates and other completely ineffective "products" sold to them by slashdot posters who'd like to keep him in the dark about real security.

    apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

    Done, no need to reboot. A managed GNU/Linux desktop is even easier. Free software is easy because it lacks restrictions. The end result for the user is a system that incorporates the best security practices with next to no effort. Effort for the developer is also reduced by code sharing, each is free to concentrate on the thing they enjoy while the rest takes care of itself.

    Silly Microturd AC, no one believes your bullshit. Bill Gates can spend ALL of his money making Slashdot carry his message, but no one will believe it. The game is over because the lies are so transparent. Windoze can't win the security, features or ease of use race. Hardware makers have realized that and the M$ domination is ending. Soon it will be over and your favorite OS will sink to the market share it deserves. If you think Vista lacks improvements and features a normal person would expect from five years of development, just wait till you see what M$ comes up with when they lose their monopoly rent revenue. Non free is dead.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      twitter, please read this carefully. Following this advice will make Slashdot a better place for everyone, including yourself.

      • As a representative of the Linux community, participate in mailing list and newsgroup discussions in a professional manner. Refrain from name-calling and use of vulgar language. Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer. Your words will either enhance or degrade the image the reader has of the Linux community.
      • Avoid hyperbole and unsubstantiated claims at all costs. It's unprofessional and will result in unproductive discussions.
      • A thoughtful, well-reasoned response to a posting will not only provide insight for your readers, but will also increase their respect for your knowledge and abilities.
      • Always remember that if you insult or are disrespectful to someone, their negative experience may be shared with many others. If you do offend someone, please try to make amends.
      • Focus on what Linux has to offer. There is no need to bash the competition. Linux is a good, solid product that stands on its own.
      • Respect the use of other operating systems. While Linux is a wonderful platform, it does not meet everyone's needs.
      • Refer to another product by its proper name. There's nothing to be gained by attempting to ridicule a company or its products by using "creative spelling". If we expect respect for Linux, we must respect other products.
      • Give credit where credit is due. Linux is just the kernel. Without the efforts of people involved with the GNU project , MIT, Berkeley and others too numerous to mention, the Linux kernel would not be very useful to most people.
      • Don't insist that Linux is the only answer for a particular application. Just as the Linux community cherishes the freedom that Linux provides them, Linux only solutions would deprive others of their freedom.
      • There will be cases where Linux is not the answer. Be the first to recognize this and offer another solution.

      From http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/docs/HOWTO/Advoca cy

    2. Re:ha ha. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

      Done, no need to reboot.


      And when your apt-get upgrades include a new kernel, what do you do then?

      Bill Gates can spend ALL of his money making Slashdot carry his message, but no one will believe it

      I'm not sure he really gives a fuck, to be honest. When you're a billionaire ex-CEO of one of the world's largest and most successful companies, whose time is increasingly devoted to running a charity foundation to distribute AIDS drugs and whatnot, I really doubt your top concern is astroturfing Slashdot.

      Non free is dead.

      Yes, of course, because nobody runs Windows or Mac OS, or even the NVidia drivers under Linux. Must be dead.

      Jesus, why is it I come away from your posts thinking I need to get my Prozac dosage upped? It's depressing in and of itself that someone can be as mouth-foamy as you are about some fscking software.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  57. anti-? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    it drives home the importance of keeping good anti-spyware and anti-virus software updated on both corporate systems as well as systems being used from home
    That's funny. I see it as raising the importance of not installing/running spyware and viruses in the first place. The detection and removal of malware should be a distant afterthought, compared to that.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  58. foamy mouth and sham charity. by twitter · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure he really gives a fuck, to be honest. When you're a billionaire ex-CEO of one of the world's largest and most successful companies, whose time is increasingly devoted to running a charity foundation to distribute AIDS drugs and whatnot, I really doubt your top concern is astroturfing Slashdot. ... It's depressing in and of itself that someone can be as mouth-foamy as you are about some fscking software.

    M$ spends about a billion dollars a month on marketing. I spend a few minutes a day.

    Bill Gates' supposed charity is his bid to 0wn medicine and education. Big drug companies like his "IP" ideas and the crappy laws he got passed but they won't like what he does to them and medicine. Those same "IP" laws have doomed millions to die without otherwise cheap medicine. Everything he does comes with strings attached, such as pledging to use M$ software, respect their patents and other nonsense that has nothing to do with medicine or education. For every dollar spent, the typically "leverages" nine in public spending but demands complete control of the results. Worse, he's used foundation funds to purchase independent newspapers that have looked into his misdeeds.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:foamy mouth and sham charity. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      M$ spends about a billion dollars a month on marketing. I spend a few minutes a day.

      Marketing, yes. Not astroturfing Slashdot.

      Bill Gates' supposed charity is his bid to 0wn medicine and education... Everything he does comes with strings attached, such as pledging to use M$ software, respect their patents and other nonsense that has nothing to do with medicine or education ... For every dollar spent, the typically "leverages" nine in public spending... he's used foundation funds to purchase independent newspapers that have looked into his misdeeds.

      Conspiracy theory much? How about some proof? And not from one of your Slashdot comments, or indeed from Slashdot at all, or any website with "Linux" in the name. A reputable source.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  59. $hit $hit $hit, that's correct. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, AC, "shit" is how M$ is pronounced.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  60. turdy, turdy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and what do we call teh insulting twitter? it's spelled "turd"!

  61. Ban Keyloggers by Rsriram · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile a new legislation bans keyloggers and people involved in the manufacture, development, distribution of keyloggers will be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years in prison.

    --
    O this learning! What a thing it is - William Shakespeare