Slashdot Mirror


Texas Makes Green Computing Mandatory

athloi writes to mention that Texas legislators have passed a bill that would require computer companies to provide free recycling services to their customers for hardware purchased. "The bill (HB 2714) requires computer manufacturers to provide a "reasonably convenient" recycling plan that requires no additional payments from consumers. Dell and HP provided some model legislation that was used as the basis for the bill, which will only affect computers purchased for personal or home business use, but it could still encourage manufacturers to adopt efficient recycling programs that might then be applied to all machines sold."

157 comments

  1. No additional payments from consumers by biocute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess that just means prices for new computers will go up $50 or so, and recycling services are, as promised, free.

    Companies might even see a better profit margin unless recycling is also forced upon consumers.

    1. Re:No additional payments from consumers by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      We should always scrutinize things a bit more carefully when it is the corporations that help draft the legislation. They aren't going to help create laws that diminish their profits. They must simply be betting that fewer consumers will use the service than buy new PCs. The media industry "helped" revamp our copyright law and that brought us the DMCA.

      Somebody ought to give you that 5th mod point.

    2. Re:No additional payments from consumers by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

      We've had this system in the Netherlands for ages already. Consumer pays 1 or 2.50 more...

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
    3. Re:No additional payments from consumers by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but people could request to purchase Keyboards without the 'W'?

    4. Re:No additional payments from consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      We've had this system in the Netherlands for ages already. Consumer pays 1 or 2.50 more...


      1 or 2.5 ... what? ... herring?

    5. Re:No additional payments from consumers by froggero1 · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Alberta there's a $25 recycling fee on new computers (I believe it's when you buy a processor and mobo in the same purchase, I may be wrong though).

      So... that may be a good number to estimate your increase costs off of.

      --
      ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    6. Re:No additional payments from consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know... everyone in the world is ahead of us backwards Americans... and we see how much better off they are for it!

    7. Re:No additional payments from consumers by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

      The euro sign got dropped in the posting it seems....

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
  2. Re:Frist Psot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No, this is just more unconstitutional eco-fascism.

  3. Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap! by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remarkable. Not for the initiative itself, which is perfectly ordinary common sense, but from where it comes from. Reminds me of the time my grandad's pig played the violin. We all clapped and shouted hooray, not because the pig was any good, but because he could do it at all.

  4. Great idea for a state... by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Who has the highest emissions of anybody in the country.

    I'm sure recycling computer parts will help out a LOT.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:Great idea for a state... by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure recycling computer parts will help out a LOT.

      I'm very concerned about what we bury and how much of it. Landfills are great for organic material but the toxic and non-biodegradable stuff is gonna cause problems for a very long time. Recycling our "stuff" is the right thing to do and it does help a LOT.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
    2. Re:Great idea for a state... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It's very misleading to look at raw quantity of emissions. A more sensible measurement is per-capita emissions. I took the raw CO2 emissions figures and the state population figures for the same year, and did the relevant calculation. Turns out many states are worse than Texas for greenhouse gas emissions. By my calculations, New York is by far the worst.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Great idea for a state... by Bob-taro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure recycling computer parts will help out a LOT.
      Whether it helps a lot or a little, it's an improvement. Don't knock incremental improvements.
      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    4. Re:Great idea for a state... by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if the people paying are the people drafting the legislation, I'd say that the price is definitely right.

    5. Re:Great idea for a state... by lgw · · Score: 1

      How is "non-biodegradable stuff" in a landfill ever going to "cause problems"? Or are you just refering to stuff that is both toxic and non-biodegradable?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Great idea for a state... by xappax · · Score: 1

      Landfills are great for organic material

      Actually, landfills are the worst possible thing for organic material, and better suited for non-biodegradable materials like plastic and metal.

      The stuff in landfills is very compressed, to the point that the critters and chemical processes which are usually responsible for biodegradation can't do their job. We essentially entomb our trash. Put a banana peel in the middle of a typical landfill, and it'll last for ages, permanently adding to the mountain of trash. Personally, I'd rather someone throw that peel into the bushes than into the garbage, since at least in the bushes it'll turn back to dirt.

      There is a great method for recycling organic waste though, and it's been around way before we invented metal/glass/plastic/paper recycling: compost. It's easy, take your organic matter and put it in a pile of a bunch of other rotting organic matter. Wait a few weeks. Like magic, you have some nice, innocuous dirt in place of your gross smelly trash! Bonus: You can then grow plants to eat very well with said dirt, or if you have a lot, sell it to someone else who grows plants.

  5. Re:Frist Psot by eviloverlordx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, this is just more unconstitutional eco-fascism.

    You're welcome to argue this in front of the Supreme Court. I'm sure they'll hear your case in a few hundred years.

    --
    'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
  6. Re:Frist Psot by mrraven · · Score: 1

    You say tomato and I say tamato, tomato, tamato, let's call the whole thing off...

    That's a joke BTW son and a riff on an old show tune, I bet you didn't know that... :)

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  7. Economies of Scale by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1

    What's dell going to do, have people ship them old computers? Ya, that'll be real cheap.

    This is one of those places where you should tax something and have the government provide the service. There are definitely going to be economies of scale.

    The Province of Alberta (Canada) already has a program where there is a small fee when you buy a computer and then they recycle old computers for free. You just take the computer to a local depot:

    http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/waste/ewaste/index.html

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
    1. Re:Economies of Scale by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Currently, HP toners come with a sticker inside that you put to the box once you replace it. The box is picked up by UPS at no cost.

    2. Re:Economies of Scale by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Dell has an agreement with Goodwill so that computers can be dropped off at Goodwill donation sites to be recycled.

      It started here in Austin in 2004, but now I see that they've expanded it to several more states. See the Dell recycling website.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Economies of Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As to the Alberta government program - when it started up, it was pretty good. Alot of electronics stores had drop off areas for electronics recycling. However, most of those stores have stopped collecting electronics recycling, as it took up too much space. Now it is hard to find a place that still takes the stuff, unless you store it until the yearly "e-waste roundup" promotion happens in the spring.

    4. Re:Economies of Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Dell already does this, and the government doesn't do much of anything "efficiently".

      Even military action is often performed better, cheaper, and safer by third party contractors. As always, bureaucracy is a bitch, and rarely (if ever?) works to everyones' benefit.

    5. Re:Economies of Scale by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      unless you store it until the yearly "e-waste roundup" promotion happens in the spring.

      Is that a problem? I mean... how much electronics waste do you produce in a year??

  8. What about other appliances? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why single out computers?

    I mean, what about all the other appliances that tend to hit landfills, such as refridgerators, dishwashers, washers&dryers, televisions, radios, etc...?

    With the newer controls and electronics many of these contain, I would tend to argue that there aren't any materials found in computers that aren't in these.

    I think that Dell's got a cheap recycling program figured out(ship them to china?), and is trying to use this to muscle out the competition, which can't arrange disposal of old machines as easily.

    Then there's the whole issue of what happens if the retailer is out of business when the customer goes to recycle his or her computer...

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:What about other appliances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers in certain wasteful countries are discarded after a very short time.

    2. Re:What about other appliances? by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I mean, what about all the other appliances that tend to hit landfills, such as refridgerators, dishwashers, washers&dryers, televisions, radios, etc...?


      Right on.

      I always thought a good policy would be to have manufactures put a recycling fee into an escrow account (that earns a nominal interest for the manufacture) at the time of sale to large resource intensive consumer goods like computers, refrigerators, stoves, etc.

      The product would have a bar code and whenever the registered local landfill or recycling depot receives the disposed product they scan the bar code and are credited for the recycling fee from the escrow account.

      This has the following benefits....

      • Places the burden of disposal up front with the purchase of the product. This is fair economics as it places the burden on those who benefit from the product (both sale and use) .

      • Source of income (instead of burden) for local landfill/recycling depots and could favor recycling.

      • Encourage manufactures to build long lived products and to support products with *replacement parts* since the longer the product remains in service the more interest the manufactures earns. This is my favorite benefit, as I have thrown away Would generate real-world statistics on product longevity and reward manufactures for building quality. If a manufactures builds a lemon like a GE Refrigerator I had, this statistics would be public accessible knowledge and maybe even support class-action suits.


    3. Re:What about other appliances? by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      I think that Dell's got a cheap recycling program figured out (ship them to china?)

      Probably.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    4. Re:What about other appliances? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'll just use my parents as an example: In the time it's taken for them to go through a computer they've also replaced the dishwasher, hot water heater, television, and sofa. My grandparents went through two televisions.

      Some people replace quicker, but many don't.

      While the others aren't replaced as quickly, I'd guess that a single refridgerator replacement would still outweigh a dozen computers*. Figure an average of 3 years between computers, you'd still be throwing away more refridgerator if you only replace that once every 30 years. Similar things for a washer/dryer set. Also, it's not like the fridge doesn't have enviromentally nasty materials in it either. A computer is actually fairly inert compared to some things.

      *Some research found the average weight of computers to be around 8 kilos and the average refridgerators at 106.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:What about other appliances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "refrigerators, dishwashers, washers&dryers, televisions, radios" ...are not controlled by a monopolistic software company that makes them expire every two years. Our landfills right now are mostly e-waste.

      Wait 'til they find out that running Linux extends a computer's usable life into the washer & dryer range, THEN this law will get repealed - but fast!

    6. Re:What about other appliances? by spiffyman · · Score: 1
      Actually, there was a significant push to get the Legislature to get them to put other appliances in as well:

      "[Activists] were pushing for a provision to require television manufacturers selling products in Texas to take back and recycle customers' old televisions, to be added to ... Republican Dennis Bonnen's widely popular House Bill 2714, and its identical Senate companion, Kirk Watson's Senate Bill 1324, which establish statewide take-back standards for computers, monitors, and laptops, at the behest of already-recycling computer makers Dell and Hewlett-Packard. E-waste crusaders Texas Campaign for the Environment led the charge to include TVs in the e-recycling bills; TCE director Robin Schneider accused Bonnen, under pressure from manufacturers, of threatening to kill the original bill if his colleagues amended it. Schneider said four states have passed TV-inclusive take-back laws so far, and emphasized the urgency of a TV take-back measure as the approaching advent of digital TV is expected to make many old sets obsolete." [emphasis mine]

      I emphasized the bit about HP and Dell because it highlights (or at least suggests) two things:
      1. Dell and HP didn't just submit legislation that Bonnen and Watson modeled their bills after. I suspect, though I don't know, that they were strong backers of the bill. I'll clap and cheer for anything environmentally sound - especially in this state - but let's not forget that businesses will be businesses. You can bet there's an ulterior motive. It probably starts with 'p' and ends with "r-o-f-i-t."
      2. Given the rumors swirling around about the pressure Bonnen was under, and given point #1, it's difficult to think seriously that TCE had a fighting chance of getting other appliances attached to the bill. The bill's major corporate sponsors (who surely know that televisions pose a significant risk to the environment) were really only interested in what their competitors were doing. Which, sadly, represents a missed opportunity, since the Lege won't be reconvening until 2009.
      Still, of course, this is probably a Good Thing(tm). It's not a perfect solution, but it's a damn sight better than what we had at the start of the session.
      --
      So you can laugh all you want to...
    7. Re:What about other appliances? by baKanale · · Score: 1

      Why single out computers?
      Why single out carbonated beverages, in terms of container deposits? The only states that mandate deposits on nearly all cans and bottles are California and Maine. Most, like New York, only do so for carbonated beverages. It's either a lack of understanding by lawmakers of the extent of the problem, or, at worst, the result of action by lobby groups (apparently the bottling industry in the US spends large amounts of money lobbying against container deposit legislation; see Wikipedia article).

      For now it's good they're mandating recycling, and hopefully the problems with the legislation will be ironed out in time, but then again there's plenty of half-assed legislation out there designed to make the public think the problem is being dealt with when it isn't entirely in hand...
    8. Re:What about other appliances? by Myrcutio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would definately increase the drive to recycle components, but it would also encourage cheap recycling, in several senses. If they get free money for claiming to recycle components, what incentive would they have to do a good job of actually putting those materials back into circulation. Sure you can put the burden on law enforcement to punish lazy recyclers, but then the recyclers will only do enough to keep themselves out of court. In order to really effect a change, you need to make the act of recycling profitable in itself, not offer reimbursement for it. Otherwise the only motive will be greed, not opportunity.

    9. Re:What about other appliances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they get free money for claiming to recycle components

      Not a hypothetical situation. There are plenty of tire "recycling" companies that are nothing but giant piles of rubber waiting to catch on fire. They get government incentives and fire insurance payoffs, and in the end all they make is thick black smoke and mosquitos.

    10. Re:What about other appliances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe, you'll be enchanted to know, already requires manufacturers to take responsibility for disposing/reuse and recycling of their own products.

      It's not that hard.

    11. Re:What about other appliances? by emeitner · · Score: 1

      Yep.
      http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/11/179 5/

      I suspect that the mountain of electronic junk could be recycled better with our inductrial technology than with chiness peasants...

      --
      Guru Meditation #6d416769.21610a21
    12. Re:What about other appliances? by xappax · · Score: 1

      I think it's a very interesting and probably a good idea, but it's a stretch to say that it'd encourage companies to prolong the life of their products through replacement parts, better workmanship, etc.

      Manufacturers produce poorly made appliances for two reasons: 1) It saves them money in the manufacturing process, obviously, but also 2) It forces people to buy their appliance (or the latest model) multiple times. You may think that if someone's appliance broke, they'd immediately go to the competitor, but you'd be surprised how many people go out and buy the next-generation iPod because their old one broke after only a year and a half. Odds are if that original iPod had lasted for 5 years they wouldn't have upgraded, so whether it was deliberate or not, Apple's fragile manufacturing becomes profitable in cases like that.

      The money they make by selling you a whole new product to replace your cheaply made, broken one is far more than they'd make in interest from their escrow account, so the most profitable choice is obvious.

  9. Smaller System Builders? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are smaller system builders considered "manufacturers"? That would explain why the bill got so much support from HP and Dell; it raises the cost of doing business.

    1. Re:Smaller System Builders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's absolutely the point of this initiative. There's a significant economy of scale that will benefit the large players. If this legislation existed when Dell was a start-up, we'd all still be buying IBM PC's.

    2. Re:Smaller System Builders? by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

      My thoughts on the situation exactly. This bill raises barriers to entry which protect the big players by forcing small players out of the business.

      No, it isn't surprising. Yes, it is despicable. Yes, consumers will pay - not only for the cost of the "free service," but also for lack of a more competitive market.

    3. Re:Smaller System Builders? by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      Yet another prefect example of how easy it is for government to be payed off in the creation stage of regulatory legislation. This is exactly how non-market monopolies are being instituted: through state for even federal legislation and regulation that was supposed to help the little guy.

      Giant corporations are putting the screws on the market every day, via more means than many know or want to acknowledge. A well educated, informed and vigilant consumer is a very good thing. A well educated, informed and vigilant group of consumers stands as market regulation in and of itself, and this is the only truly effective brand of regulation.

      Only we're not allowed to have that, since regulation often times is written and maintained poorly--either intentionally (greedy maliciousness) or accidentally (gross incompetence)--and this will in the end hinder consumer choice. Because of this the state effectively grants large corporations the monopolies that not even the market could give them.

      Forget about my shit product. I'm going to lobby $LEVEL government for a state granted monopoly. Yee-freaking-haw.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
  10. Re:Frist Psot by bobo+mahoney · · Score: 0

    George W is turning over in his grave. Ohh wait he isn't dead, just brain-dead.

    --
    Bobo Mahoney
  11. Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by schwaang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dell's recycling option is offered for free. They give you mailing labels to send your old computer and monitor via DHL or something.

    I don't know how much it actually costs Dell (obviously more than they charge), but so far Dell still has very low prices.

    I can see why Dell would help force this on the competition... But in the end it's probably net positive for everybody.

    1. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      It has to become garbage somewhere.

      I've sent hundreds of old computers, monitors, and printers to a local recyclying place. They said that this stuff gets stuck on a pallet and shpped to India and Bangladesh where it gets dissassembled and processed.

      Interesting thing is that no inkjet printers were allowed to be dropped off as the dissassembly is too difficult and not enough of a particular model has been available for them to become proficient in dissassembly.

      I just can't imagine that millions of 540mb HDDs are in use in India. I can imagine a heap of them sitting in a landfill. If old HDDs are crushed, it only becomes crushed garbage.
      Monitors can have the plastic casing become recycled and the glass cleaned and reused but that's a lot of effort.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by Nimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dell's recycling option is offered for free.


      TANSTAAFL. The money for that's coming from somewhere, just as a hotel's "free" breakfast is.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by schwaang · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has to become garbage somewhere.


      Yes, maybe at first. But Germany has a law that requires manufacturers to take things back for disposal. I think Japan has something similar. It is expected that manufacturers will as a result modify their designs to make disposal or reuse cheaper for themselves. The hope is that this means cutting down on the variety of different chemicals used, and substituting non-toxics where possible.

      There is also a notion called Cradle to Cradle which is gaining ground.

      So this Texas law could be the US starting to play catch-up.

      There is also increasing awareness of the enviro-dumping you mention on the part of developed countries in India, China, Vietnam, etc.

      It's a step-by-step process to fix this mess.
    4. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by daeg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt many things are recycled wholesale. Instead, they are taken apart by cheap laborers and machines and sorted into material types. For instance, melting all plastics down can create a cheap source of low-grade plastic suitable for things like residential drainage pipes, plastic mesh, non-fire retardant insulation, etc. Metal can be processed using the same metal processing that normal recyclers use after the more valuable pieces are removed. Ceramics, silicone, rubber, and glass can be crushed/melted and used as additives to asphalt or roofing tiles. Most paper can be recycled, too, or at least burnt fairly cleanly.

    5. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by no_pets · · Score: 1

      I have no links to this (too lazy) but I have read/heard/saw on TV that it's cheaper/easier to get the gold and other metals out of old electronics than to mine. I have no idea how much the metal in a typical PC would be worth but perhaps enough to help cover the shipping costs back to Dell or wherever Dell is having them shipped?

      The point that I'm making is that it really doesn't (maybe) cost Dell anything, all things considered, to recycle these PCs.

      --
      "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    6. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by schwaang · · Score: 1

      The point that I'm making is that it really doesn't (maybe) cost Dell anything, all things considered, to recycle these PCs.


      I don't have any actual data on this, but I strongly suspect it *does* cost Dell something, and that's part of why they helped to write the Texas legislation -- so that their competitors will have to pay too.

      (If they could make much money doing it, why is it hard to find places that will recycle computers for free?)
    7. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "TINSTAAFL"? Or am I wrong to feel proud of myself for deciphering that acronym as "there is no such thing as a free lunch"?

    8. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      You aint been around here long, have you?

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    9. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      (If they could make much money doing it, why is it hard to find places that will recycle computers for free?)

      It's not.

      pcdisposal.com
      freecomputerrecycling.com

      Just fucking Google it. "free computer recycling" gave me a lot of hits.

      Since it is so easy to find free recycling places, one has to wonder what's in it for Dell and HP. My guess is that their work supporting this law is actually to help the environment.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't imagine that millions of 540mb HDDs are in use in India. I can imagine a heap of them sitting in a landfill. If old HDDs are crushed, it only becomes crushed garbage.

      HDDs are almost sold aluminum. I'm sure it's worth the effort to not landfill them.

    11. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Well that's because you're not supposed to try to recycle old inkjet printers. You're supposed to use them as the primary raw material for a homebrew C&C mill.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You ain't very smart, are ya?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    13. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by jjinco33 · · Score: 1

      There are companies here that take all the old equipment for free. They then separate the materials and sell them to different buyers. Plastics, metals, etc all go off to get recycled and resold to the guys who made them the first time. Except monitors. There is a $10 charge for them to take a monitor. Asshats.

      --
      Meh.
    14. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see why Dell would help force this on the competition... But in the end it's probably net positive for everybody.

      Unless, of course, you want to start building PCs for a living. Since Dell, HP, aren't computer manufacturers, they're just assemblers, I would imagine the same laws that apply to them apply to anyone who wants to start a PC shop where they've built their own rigs to sell. It's an already bleeding edge business and most don't last long, but this is just another nail in the coffin, lovingly provided by the big guys using our Mercantile government to make sure it's just that much harder to get into the business.

      So OF COURSE Dell and HP back it. I'd be amazed if they didn't.

    15. Re:Dell charges $0, and they're still cheap by dkf · · Score: 1

      I'm feeling kindly today. It's an acronym that originated in award-winning literature, and if you've not read that book, it's a good day to change that.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  12. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by eln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here in Texas, we now have all the electricity we need to take on these large environmental projects thanks to the 7 brand new pollution-spewing coal-fired power plants currently being rushed through the approval process.

  13. Corporations writing laws? by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dell and HP provided some model legislation that was used as the basis for the bill

    I'm not naive--I know it happens all the time, but I still get the shivers every time I read things like this. Am I the only one uncomfortable with the concept of corporations drafting laws?

    I wonder what our country's founding fathers would have thought of the newspapers of their time reporting "This bill, drafted by the Honourable East India Company, and passed by Congress..."

    1. Re:Corporations writing laws? by eln · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much how it works these days. The corporation writes the bill, then hires lobbyists to make sure it passes through Congress. Other corporations may then hire other congress people to attach irrelevant riders to these bills authorizing various pork barrel projects. If a lobbyist encounters a congress person who is not willing and eager to go along, they may need to take that congress person on a "fact finding mission" to a Caribbean resort in order to persuade them with various perks. If that doesn't work, they can be persuaded with Polaroids portraying them engaged in various perversions with said perks.

      In short: Schoolhouse Rock lied to you.

    2. Re:Corporations writing laws? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      To an extent, I'd hope that the EITC was invovled in the drafting of a bill that would affect it directly. Otherwise you get legislatures passing stupid stuff that'll cripple business.

      It's when the business writes the entire draft that you have to be concerned. This sounds scary, at least to me.

      I figure that Dell&HP think that they can handle the recycling costs cheaper than other manufacturers and that this will give them an advantage over other companies.

      That, or that by getting this passed they won't get something more onerous.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Corporations writing laws? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      I'm not naive--I know it happens all the time, but I still get the shivers every time I read things like this. Am I the only one uncomfortable with the concept of corporations drafting laws?

      It's either companies in the businesses affected writing them or, "The internet isn't a truck, it's a series of tube" Congresscritters.

      Personally, I'd rather have the businesses.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Corporations writing laws? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I'm not naive--I know it happens all the time, but I still get the shivers every time I read things like this. Am I the only one uncomfortable with the concept of corporations drafting laws?


      Certainly not.

      I wonder what our country's founding fathers would have thought of the newspapers of their time reporting "This bill, drafted by the Honourable East India Company, and passed by Congress..."


      Our founding fathers were probably used to commercial interests drafting laws and lobbying for them, and probably used to far more aggressive (on both sides) press reporting about particular instances of that then we see today.

    5. Re:Corporations writing laws? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      It's either companies in the businesses affected writing them or, "The internet isn't a truck, it's a series of tube" Congresscritters.


      Many of the times "Congresscritters" say stupid things that get them mocked by people who understand the subject, its not because they are particularly ignorant, but rather because they are trying to throw up a wall of obfuscation around the position they are carrying on behalf of industry, because they aren't interested in people paying attention to and understanding the substance of that position.

    6. Re:Corporations writing laws? by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

      I pledge allegiance to the feast of The Bottomless Gullet of the Corporation and to the Profit for which it stands, one Enterprise under Barbarism, impudent, with brutishness and covetousness for all.

    7. Re:Corporations writing laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...For the land of the pleeb, and the home of the slave!!!

    8. Re:Corporations writing laws? by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      Considering that they started a war over corporation-drafted laws, I'd guess they'd be agin it.

    9. Re:Corporations writing laws? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I'm not naive--I know it happens all the time, but I still get the shivers every time I read things like this. Am I the only one uncomfortable with the concept of corporations drafting laws?

      I wonder what our country's founding fathers would have thought of the newspapers of their time reporting "This bill, drafted by the Honourable East India Company, and passed by Congress..."


      Um, the difference was that EIC did have access to the British congress, but the founding fathers didn't have access to the British congress so they didn't have any weight at getting British laws passed or modified in their favor. If the founding fathers class had voting rights and such in the British congress, then we'd have not broken away at the time.

      I have nothing against companies trying to get laws passed in their interest. Why? Its a basic human prinicple of "I want things to be atleast fair to our side or weighted to my side's favor in all contests and we don't care about the other side." Apply that to everything, dating, family, education, government, spreading of religion, science, and slashdot. The prinicple means that a few will always try to get laws/rules passed for their benefit. If that didn't happen then we wouldn't be human any more.

      This is one of the few things that I'm some what in favor for. I love having every HP inkcart having its own prepaid mailer to have the old one recycled/remaned. I would love it to be that easy for every product.

  14. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, we *need* those plants to provide surplus generation capacity for the next time there's money to be made taking a plant (or five) offline in California and then selling them our electricity at triple the market rate!

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  15. No such thing as free by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cost will just be passed along to the consumer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No such thing as free by bdjacobson · · Score: 1

      The cost will just be passed along to the consumer. Actually, it will be shifted. From the environment to the consumer's wallet.

      Which is good. I like my fish without mercury, thank you very much.
    2. Re:No such thing as free by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You are making the assumption that people will actually take advantage of this. It's much more likely that most people will continue as they are doing and everyone will still have to pay for it, used or not.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:No such thing as free by JonathanR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consumers will take advantage of it if landfill operators refuse to accept, and recycling firms charge to accept the waste.

      Then the consumer will see that using the manufacturer's recycling scheme is advanatageous.

    4. Re:No such thing as free by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You've made another assumption... That the landfill operators have -any- idea what's in the garbage bags before they accept them. And afterwards, they have no idea who it came from.

      I agree, if you can somehow force the majority of the population to recycle, things would be better. So far, in the past few decades, we've failed at that. How is this any different?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:No such thing as free by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      The point is to keep 80% of the recyclable waste from hitting the landfill. If a policy framework can do this, then things are better off. You'll always get dickheads who will circumvent such rules to save a few bucks. However, if a simple and easy recycling method is available (and advertised on the item) then chances are, the majority of people will work with the system

    6. Re:No such thing as free by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If it means -any- inconvenience for most people, they won't bother. Don't believe me? Take a look at the highway today. Notice all the trash? That was put there by all the assholes that can't be bothered to throw it away properly, at -no- cost to them. It's just slightly inconvenient to take it home. The $500 fine for littering doesn't even dissuade them. (Florida law, may differ elsewhere.) And don't even get me started about cigarette butts that can cause fires that kill people and destroy lives of others.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    7. Re:No such thing as free by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe that's the right thing? Maybe we SHOULD have to pay, up front, for the disposal costs of the items we purchase.

      Having said that, the Texas government could just give the companies a tax break equivalent to the expense of running the recycling program. That way it is ultimately the government (and taxpayers) who pay for it. That makes sense, doesn't it? Who else should pay for it? Grays from Mars?

    8. Re:No such thing as free by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, its the wrong thing to do. What if i choose not to dispose of the product? Why should i be penalized? Hell i should get a discount!

      Good example is my collection of retro computers, ive never thrown one away yet that ive bought ( and thats over 30 machines, neatly stacked in the garage in their original cartons )

      Paying at time of disposal is more accurate and equitable.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    9. Re:No such thing as free by pclminion · · Score: 1

      No, its the wrong thing to do. What if i choose not to dispose of the product? Why should i be penalized? Hell i should get a discount!

      In an ideal world, sure. But in our NON-ideal world, most consumers are lazy and would probably dispose of their electronics in a dumpster. In fact, why not make it a refundable deposit like many states already do with recyclable bottles and cans?

  16. Blondes throughout texas.. by planckscale · · Score: 1
    ...are soon found working at their offices with green hair dye, green cloths and similarly colored keyboards and mice.

    --
    Namaste
  17. Holes in plan? by ShagratTheTitleless · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A couple of points for the easily deceived:
    • "Free" as in YOU pay for it at the time of purchase.
    • If the company you bought the hardware from goes out of business I assume you end up paying for a service you never get.
    • You pay long before you receive the service. Right now recycling of that nature is expensive but will probably become cheaper. You however get the early adopter mega fee!
    • Suppose you find an outfit willing to pay you to recycle your hardware? Now your "free" recycling fee is just an unnecessary tax.
    • That fictional recycling company that pays you will never exist because the government just killed competition in that sector at the private citizen level.
    • I hate the stupid government.
    --
    Sometimes at night I imagine the darkness is filled with horrible things with too many teeth, like Julia Roberts.
  18. Why link it to purchases? by British · · Score: 1

    Okay, if you provide a recycling option for your old 'puta ONLY if you buy a new one, that could get sticky. What if you buy a new system as separate parts from different retailers? Neither individual purchase constitutes a "computer", but I'm still going to have an old system to recycle.

  19. Walker TEXAS Ranger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here is his platform (he really wrote this):

    Require members of Congress to work out on the Total Gym 15 minutes each day - or else they can't vote on anything.

    Cut spending by dismissing the Secret Service, at least for my eight years in office (why would I need them?).

    Resurrect Bruce Lee and appoint him head of homeland security (OK, the CIA and FBI too).

    Give a presidential pardon to ... no one, ever. Baretta was right in the '70s, "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time. Don't do it!"

    Turn the Rose Garden into a new fighting ring for the World Combat League, in which liberals and conservatives will fight for legislative leadership and priority. (For fun, Saturday night fights will feature a recurring bout between Hannity and Colmes). "American Idol" already told me they will provide the entertainment.

    Require Bill Gates and Warren Buffet to personally pay for national, comprehensive medical coverage for every American (or meet me in the Rose Garden).

    Increase jobs in America by sending ninja teams to sabotage and steal them back from other countries.

    Tattoo an American flag with the words, "In God we trust," on the forehead of every atheist.

    (Column continues below)

    Give a tax credit to anyone naming their children Walker or Texas Ranger (excluding Will Farrell).

    Resolve the Iraq war by bringing all of our military personnel home immediately, then going over there by myself for "martial arts negotiations."

    Hang Saddam Hussein (Whoops - scratch that - already did it undercover).

    Convey my plan for world peace to the United Nations: taking the governor of California with me on our "kick butt and ask questions later" USO world tour.

    Give every new military enlistee abroad a copy of my upcoming new book, "The Threat of Justice," with the words, "Arnold and I will be back to pump you up!" above my autograph.

    Bring on Donald Trump as my apprentice. When my presidential term is complete and he has obtained his black belt, or whichever comes first, he can buy the White House and of course rename it (to, what else, "The Trump House").

    Create new immigration legislation: to deport all liberals (then force them to listen to Bill O' Reilly every day for five years, at which point they may return).

    Ask producer Mark Barnett to film "Survivor - Camp David," where world leaders will meet annually, for an all-out cage-fighting championship. The winner will take home $1,000,000 in Disney Dollars, good in Europe or America.

    Send an autographed photo of me and my horse (no dogs in my White House) to everyone who commits to read my new WorldNetDaily "presidential column" and blast a blog who dares to disagree with me.

    Complete the plan to bring Tony Blair to the U.S. as my vice president.

    Expose the real WMDs - my fists and feet.

    Replace Letterman, Leno or Conan once monthly, since stand-up comedy is what most governmental officials do anyway.

    Ask Al Gore to provide me with a special governmental study on the connection between spotted owl extinction and global warming. (I'm pretty sure Michael Moore will film the docudrama).

    Help Rosie transition from "The View" to the pew - it might help her get over that anger problem. If the pew doesn't work, she can spar Trump in the Rose Garden.

    First and foremost, however, my greatest priorities will be to ...

    Personally smoke out bin Laden by myself and round-house kick him all the way back to America, where my United Fighting Arts Federation will handle the justice issues.

    Make all Chuck Norris facts come true (well, not quite all of them - I'm a happily, married man!)

  20. "home" business use? by Itninja · · Score: 1

    So how long before people start showing up with truckfuls of circa 1999 servers and claim they're all from their home-based business? In the town where I work they offer free paper recycling for personal and home business use. But invariably the bin is stuffed with paper that is obviously from neither of those sources (i.e. baled and bound paper shreddings, industrially die cut waste).

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  21. Good ol' progressive Texas by Sunburnt · · Score: 1
    And a bunch of other states as well, supporting such a wonderful industry.

    --
    Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
  22. Re: Texas does something progressive by KillerCow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not if you read the headline as: "Texas raises barrier to entry for competitors of Dell and HP."

    Notice how it does not affect business buyers, where the large players are already protected by a high barrier to entry.

  23. Oh well. No more 'free' computers for Linux, then by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    When I was younger, one of the ways I learned networking was by putting Linux on a number of surplus boxes and hooking them together. Earlier than that, I used one of my older 'spare' machines as the first testbed for exploring with Linux.

    All I can see initiatives like this amounting to is that Dell will whisk away the old box before anybody can think of a way to use it. Out of sight, out of mind, and nobody engages in the dangerous and subversive activity of putting a non-Microsoft OS on it.

  24. Re:Frist Psot by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, this is just more unconstitutional eco-fascism. That's funny. I see it as the Texas legislature forcing manufacturers to explore a new revenue stream.

    You see, PC recycling is a profitable business, once you get away from CRTs. I've found at least three places in West Michigan that will pay me cash for old computer hardware.
  25. Dell announces 1 Terrabyte storage in all new PCs! by jadin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see...

    250GB drive..
    250GB drive..
    250GB drive..
    100GB drive..
    60 GB drive..
    50 GB drive..
    40 GB drive..

    Unheard of storage at an unbeatable price!

  26. Texas Computer Recycling by uolamer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recently changed my recycling policy here in Texas with my computers. Until a month ago it was I upgraded, then my room mate upgraded with my old parts, then the living room emu/movie/etc pc got upgraded, etc with the parts. at the very end the left over stuff was sat 100 yards from back of the house and shot with a 22-250 (rifle)..
    now we added an extra step where my room mate upgrades another friend ;) But we are considering making the chain long enough so the parts finally end up in Russia and in exchange they give us a "bride" or something, haven't worked the details out yet.

    --
    s/©//g
  27. MODERATORS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! If you didn't, Walker would kick your balls so hard that they would fly through your mouth and end up in a Chinese factory. Then, they would end up in the ball hopper and be packaged into the little toy machine egg bubble things and be sent back to the USA. At that point, Walker would stare you down with his death stare and make you buy the imported balls from a toy machine for 50 cents and then force you to swallow them so that they would go back to where they started. At that point, Walker would roundhouse kick you back to the Chinese factory and make you work there as a slave for the rest of your life. That is, if the roundhouse kick or supersonic speed that you would have to attain to get to China wouldn't disintegrate you before you got there.

  28. Re:Frist Psot by Tdawgless · · Score: 1

    Kinda like further developing the transistor?

  29. irony - not enough by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    Texas pollutes more than most of the world generating electricity from coal. While this is a good plan, it does not even scratch the surface of Texas' environmental transgressions.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070602/ap_on_sc/globa l_warming_states;_ylt=ArFTHR1Kvm.qQ36YLKhfGT3MWM0F

  30. Re:Oh well. No more 'free' computers for Linux, th by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    All I can see initiatives like this amounting to is that Dell will whisk away the old box before anybody can think of a way to use it. Out of sight, out of mind, and nobody engages in the dangerous and subversive activity of putting a non-Microsoft OS on it.

    So, start a Free Geek chapter and make a deal with the computer shops to handle their recycling for them.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  31. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Troll

    Good, I'm glad! I hope Texas (my state) fucks over Cali for being retarded enough not to build more power plants.

    Repeat after me. Environmentalism and Economies HATE each other. You can't have one without messing up the other! Cali made their choice to be "Green". Now they can reap what they sow.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  32. Mom and Pop by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    No wonder Dell and HP are behind this, it will kill the small mom and pop stores who are just barely making money on razor thin margins.

  33. The "free" alternative by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Just dump it and don't pay now. Pass the environmental costs on to our children etc.

    Remember folks, we don't own the world. We're just borrowing it from our children.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:The "free" alternative by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Ever bought tires? They charge you upfront, regardless if you leave the tires at the store or take them back home. They assume you are going to dump them, even if you want to chop them up for fuel or to make a flower pot out of them.

      You are automatically assumed to be a criminal and are charged as such.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  34. Apple's recycling program by NightHwk1 · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a Mac Pro, and noticed that I could box up my old PC and send it to Apple for recycling for no charge. Of course I didn't send it in, since it's not completely dead yet...

  35. You would prefer governments drafting laws? by patio11 · · Score: 1

    I would much rather leave as much as possible about computers to people who actually KNOW computers rather than to the underinformed and woefully overconfident junior staffers of figureheads who think that the Internet is a series of tubes. (Legislators do not write legislation. Their staff and aides write legislation. The legislator reads a summary prepared for him which, on a good day, actually explains what the bill does.)

    Darn few people in Texas know the business of computers better than Dell.

  36. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Derosian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Texas isn't a one face State, we are large enough to have a myriad of different beliefs, after all have you ever been to Austin. You know, the Live Music Capital of the US.

  37. Recycle or ship by fathed · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet that the recycle program is really just a program that will ship the junk to some country that doesn't care, which will pile it up, and probably burn it at some point.

    --
    Intelligence is a matter of opinion.
  38. Re: Texas does something progressive by adrianmonk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not if you read the headline as: "Texas raises barrier to entry for competitors of Dell and HP."

    I hate to be cynical, but living in Texas, I know how things work here, and that is the most likely explanation. Texas government is about as business-friendly as it gets (that's regarded as a virtue around here by many people). Plus, you should ask yourself where Dell is headquartered, and the answer is Texas. Then you should also ask yourself where Compaq was headquartered before HP bought them, and the answer is also Texas. So, the world's two largest PC manufacturers have a big presence in Texas, and "coincidentally" those two companies just got the Texas legislature to pass a bill that makes life hard for their competitors.

    Coincidentally, AMD and Intel also have a huge presence here in Austin, the capital city of Texas, and I guess they could've/should've opposed this on the grounds that stifling competition is bad for the industry, but there is no chance they would've for two reasons: fear of pissing off Dell and HP, and fear of looking like they're anti-environment.

  39. Re:Frist Psot by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    Definitely, but how does it being unconstitutional matter ?

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  40. Typical feel-good, no-good crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are the "unintended consequences" of this sort of thing:

    1. Smaller manufacturers will feel the costs more than the big ones.

    2. Hiding the costs from the consumer (by ostensibly "sticking" it to the big bad manufacturer, only to have them return it to the consumer hidden in the price) only serves to keep them unaware of what exactly is the cost of their shopping pattern. It has long been said that the taxes in this country would be a lot lower if we all had to pay taxes in full each year instead of "hiding" them via withholding. The same could be said of all the junk we are piling up -- if the consumer were to shoulder the full cost of waste disposal, and could see it plain as day in the form of his trash bill, the demand for stuff that is cheaper to dispose of (either it lasts a lot longer, or is optimized for recycling so that it's worth the effort of collecting) would shoot up.

    But hey, I realize that's free market thinking, and this is Slashdot.

  41. Well damn -- since it has been determined that ... by 3seas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... crunched up computer electronics contains a lot more precious metals than the ore that originated the metals... they should be paying the individuals disposing the stuff....

  42. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Glith · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but any new plant built will have far better environmental efficiency than the decades-only plants that they're replacing. Opening up the new plants would relegate the old ones all but disabled except during absolute peak times (brownouts, anyone)?

    All they're accomplishing is keeping the obsolete pollution-spewing plants operating at full capacity practically non-stop.

  43. Germany and Japan export everything by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's easy for Germany to have a feel good law about their own domestic manufacturing, because the bulk of that nation's income is from exports. How about we start sending all of our trash from German made exports to the USA back to Germany?

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Germany and Japan export everything by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      In the US (or other net importers), there will always be a local company who is the distributor and who profits from the sale of the imported goods. If they benefit from the distribution of goods, then they should also wear some of the costs associated with disposal/clean-up for the goods' end-of-life waste.

    2. Re:Germany and Japan export everything by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Then the local distributor can pay to ship it back to the nation of origin.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Germany and Japan export everything by dkf · · Score: 1

      If the local distributor decides that the most cost-effective way of dealing with the problem is to ship the stuff back to the nation of origin for recycling, that's fine with me. But that's their problem, not mine. (The real problem comes when the local distributor (or manufacturer) goes out of business between when the object was made and when it needs disposal. Which happens quite a lot...)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Germany and Japan export everything by quax · · Score: 1

      Since most of the German exports are durable goods i.e. cars, machines, appliances etc. I'd say that'll be a net gain for Germany given the current elevated prices for commodities (especially if the US pays for shipping).

      You also seem to overestimate how much is exported to the US. It only accounts for 9% of the total exports. The bulk of it goes to other EU countries.

  44. Anti-competitive by mqatrombone · · Score: 1

    This bill could kill any mom and pop shop. They will likely get hit the most by this bill.

    --
    If 76 Trombones really led the big parade, why did they have anyone else in it?
  45. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being retarded enough not to build more power plants.

    Yeah, gee, damn them for being so stupid as to be unable to make more power plants magically appear in seconds whenever Enron feels like they should flip the switches.

    There were enough power plants in California to cover all normal operating usage. Building more plants would have led to expensive capital investments in mothballs, unless of course someone knew in advance that Enron was going to start shutting off plants for fun.

    Blame the hippies all you want, deep in your heart you know the truth is that building new plants just in case someone decides to pull another Enron would only raise the cost of electricity in order to make back all the costs of construction and generating unused power (if it was ever turned on at all).

  46. did you even look at them? by schwaang · · Score: 1

    Those links are bogus.
    One is the UK.
    The other is not free.

    Have you actually tried to recycle e-waste lately? I remember when HP did a free recycling program with OfficeDepot a couple of years ago, I got rid of a garage worth of stuff, and then went out of my way to buy supplies at OfficeDepot out of sheer gratitude.

    1. Re:did you even look at them? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      How is being in the UK bogus?

      At any rate, http://www.ynotrecycle.com/ and http://www.recyclingelectronics.com/ are free and in the US.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  47. Re: Texas does something progressive by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Not really. There's enough valuable metals in electronics to make recycling them profitable. (With the offset being CRTs, of course, but we're moving away from those.) One ton of electronic waste has more gold in it than one ton of gold ore.

    Even if small manufacturers don't want to deal with the overhead, they can contract it out to companies that would be happy to make a dime or two. Sounds like that's a good business to be in in Texas right now.

  48. Green Computing? by PPH · · Score: 1
    What's that? Cabbage in, cabbage out.

    Does this have anything to do with Cole's Law.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. So what's the free way to dispose of this? by sheldon · · Score: 1

    Since you are so bright and obviously know so much more than all of us clods, perhaps you could educate us all.

  50. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a gigantic wind farm proposed for off the coast of Texas a few months back?

    In Canada, I believe that Alberta (our version of Texas, if you will) also has similar legislation.

    Now if Texas did curbside recycling pickup of paper, plastic and glass, they'd be able to divert a whole lot more trash from the landfills.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  51. Re:Dell announces 1 Terrabyte storage in all new P by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

    They'd have to use the cases Gateway used.

    I opened up somebody's Gateway from 98. It was like 90% empty space.

  52. How long? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    How long until "mandatory" recycling? You have an old computer without the latest hardware tracking and DRM assist devices in it. It is more than x years old and therefore qualifies for "mandatory" recycling.

    This would be a great boon to Dell, HP, Gateway and Lenovo. It would force people to upgrade to new computers. The only question is how long qualifies? One year? Two? Certainly no more than three years.

  53. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only people in Austin call it the live music capital of the world.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  54. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I read, the California energy situation had more to do with Enron than with poor planning. When we've privatized something the public absolutely has to have and scarcity is profitable, scarcity is what you get. By design.

  55. Affecting Interstate commerce? by Jaidan · · Score: 1

    IANAL, So someone with a little more understanding how does this affect a non local company. Such as a company based in another state shipping computers to customers in Texas? Would such a company be required to deal with the Texas law, or would it only affect those making computers in Texas? I tried to read the bill, but I couldn't come up with anything conclusive.

  56. Waste Electrical + Electronic Equipment Directive by IndieKid · · Score: 1

    The Waste Electrical And Electronic Equipment Directive (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Electrical_and _Electronic_Equipment_Directive) in the EU covers the recycling of all electrical goods (including computers) by their manufacturers. The manufacturers are supposed to cover all the costs and all member states were meant to have adjusted their local laws by 2005.

    Some people say this is one of the reasons that people in the UK pay so much more for their electronic goods than people in the US (can't find a source right now). Maybe now that everyone has to burden the costs (not just those in the EU) we'll start to see some fairer pricing over here in the UK.

  57. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

    I'm quite as amazed as you are, Texas used to be proud of its independence, and individualism. For some reason, although Comrade Perry certainly helps, Texas is trying to out-California California these days.

    I guess the damn Yankees have finally completely taken over.

    Computer recycling is good, but liberty is more important.

    --
    Most people don't even think inside the box.
  58. Recupel by jonathan+DS · · Score: 1

    I live in Belgium, and we've got a comparable system.
    The consumer pays a 'small' fee so all electric and electronic equipment can be recycled. The fact that the consumer pays for it, brings an advantage. Because of this it's possible to return your broken crap at any store and they will take care of the rest.
    The fees are reasonable, depending on the appliance.
    If you want to learn more: http://www.recupel.be/portal/page?_pageid=531,7707 92&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL/

    1. Re:Recupel by jonathan+DS · · Score: 1
  59. In other news by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Bush's third cousin Fred announces a new computer recycling plant.
    Seriously, now the green issues are just another way to tax more green.

    Oh, don't get me wrong, I would love a true open green initiative, but let's see who is making the real green from green.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:In other news by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      All environmental laws and movements are a marketing scheme. They recognize a certain percentage of the population feels guilty about being wealthy and consuming; so they market to them to allow them to assuage their guilt by 'going green'. People will gladly fork over extra money to feel better about their purchases, regardless of whether they are actually making a difference.

      And in turn, because 'green' is popular, the government gets involved to garner votes from the popularity. And in turn, other companies with fly-by-night ideas want a piece of the money the government is spending in green ideas.

      And everything is dandy, unless you're a politician and the wind farm is going to be near your property, then your true colors will show.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  60. the true cost by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

    Not a big surprise, really, and frankly -- it's about time. It's not a new idea that the cost of a consumer item should include the true cost, including disposal/recycling.

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
  61. Re:Dell announces 1 Terrabyte storage in all new P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, the whole Earth?!?

  62. Oh, that's what it means. by McGurk · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that "recycling" meant "wasting energy and natural resources to dismantle trash." Informative+++!

    --
    You're doing it wrong--http://youredoingitwrong.mee.nu
  63. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Environmentalism and Economies HATE each other. I am so sick of this argument. It's the Republican party line and it is very shortsighted. Environmentalism only hates economics if:
    1) The environmentalism is environmental wacko ("Wind power? Those towers are ugly!")
    2) Your competitors invest in technology but you don't

    One of the problem the U.S. has is that we decided not to invest in battery/hybrid/flex fuel vehicles because it was considered too expensive. That would only have been a sound economic decision if everyone else made the same decision. But Japan did. So now, the only battery/hybrid/flex fuel vehicles are made outside the U.S. and U.S. auto-makers are scrambling to catch-up or they go out of business. This is a case where environmentalism and economies were 100% in line.

    Same goes with power plants. You can't regulate power prices and refuse to build new power plants. That has nothing to do with environmentalism, it's just a stupid economic decision. And now that oil prices are on the rise, we see that building other forms of power plants is not only environmentally friend, but it is also becoming economical.

    This isn't a case where California made the choice to be "green" -- it is a case where California, like much of the U.S. chose not to be green, and they are paying the price. But at least they don't have those ugly wind farms blocking the beautiful views.
  64. Re: Texas does something progressive by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Coincidentally, AMD and Intel also have a huge presence here in Austin, the capital city of Texas, and I guess they could've/should've opposed this on the grounds that stifling competition is bad for the industry, but there is no chance they would've for two reasons: fear of pissing off Dell and HP, and fear of looking like they're anti-environment.

    How is forcing everyone in the state to pay a little bit more for a product automatically favoring HP or Dell? I don't see why AMD or Intel should complain at all. Unless you want to say that they should complain because they might both be made to think about how to make their products more recyclable? If it's a government rule put out on everyone, then no one has an advantage except those that don't follow the rules. Are you saying small businesses shouldn't have to recycle or pay a recycling tax because they are small businesses?

  65. Computers are the low hanging fruit by stomv · · Score: 1

    What's it cost to ship a desktop, LCD monitor, or laptop? What's the convenience factor? What's the turnover rate on these electronics?
    What's it cost to ship a dishwasher, refrigerator, washer, or dryer? What's the convenience factor? What's the turnover rate on these electronics?

    I agree that all appliances should be [eventually] included -- but this is the low hanging fruit. Compared to "white" appliances, computers are cheaper to ship, tend to get replaced more frequently, and almost certainly contain more electronic nasties per pound, cubic inch, or other metric. Furthermore, since the evolution of computer parts is so much faster than the evolution of "white" appliance parts, the feedback loop to modify the way the electronics are manufactured [to cheapen reprocessing later] is shorter, and so modifications to the manufacturing process itself will occur sooner at Dell than at Maytag.

    After computers, I'd seek to include battery-operated electronics. They're far more similar to computers than "white" appliances on all the metrics I wrote about above.

  66. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Zencyde · · Score: 1

    He said "live music capital of the US". If you've ever been there then you would understand. :D

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  67. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Zencyde · · Score: 1

    Have you ever actually driven through central Texas? There's a lot of green out there and it's all under governmental protection. We're not as uncaring as you think, asshole. You try managing a major metropolitan city like Houston. It's spread out, mind you. I can drive for 25 minutes while maintaining an average speed of 80 MPH before actually leaving the city limits. Try designing an efficient form of transportation around that. Not easy, is it? If we're going to lower the pollution rates then it will take baby steps. Also, the total state population coupled with how spread out each of our six major cities are (unless you count Dallas and Fort Worth as being one city, no one will yell at you about that very much) makes for providing power a difficult task. Houston's population alone is climbing to nearly 4 million. That's nothing to scoff at! So, before you bitch about Texas not being "green" enough for your tastes, remember the fact that reasons exist for everything. Didn't the Schroedinger's cat experiment teach you anything? And no, I'm not a member of the Republican party.

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  68. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bullshit. The reality, for those curious, is that captive markets + deregulation and consumers hate each other. The energy debacle in Cali had one single root cause: deregulation. It's just that simple. Good like finding a republican who will admit *that*, though...

  69. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    In Canada, I believe that Alberta (our version of Texas, if you will) also has similar legislation.

    It's not legislation (in fact, I'm not aware of any legislation passed to this effect). It's reality. There are a number of wind farms in southern Alberta, including Cowley Ridge, which has been running since the early 90s, The McBride Lake Wind Farm, which has been running since 2003, The Summerview Wind Farm , which opened in 2005, and many others I'm sure I've missed, with more being planned.

  70. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by SrJsignal · · Score: 1
    Yes, we have multiple large windfarms: http://www.greenmountainenergy.com/texas/brazos_wi ndfarm.shtml (Ranks in the top 10 in the US).

    And the DFW area does curbside recycling, I'd imagine all the metro areas do.

    Also, Texas, as a disconnected power grid (we do not have any AC tie lines to other states) does not sell excess power to other states. That means we also don't purposely import most of our electricity from other states so we can claim to be green because we don't "produce" emissions from power generation (see: California).

  71. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    I live there, and here people call it the live music capital of the world. Which you'd know if you'd ever been here...

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  72. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Zencyde · · Score: 1

    Thought you were responding directly to what the parent had said. Nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  73. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    No, your wrong because deregulation is working out AWSOME in Houston, TX. I suggest looking again at the failures in Cali. Only if they had more local power generation available...

    It's a straw hut for you. Hippy! Haha

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  74. Re:Frist Psot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow.

    That was retarded.

    What are you, four?

    Tell your liberal Daddy he did a good job raising you - you make fun of George W too!

  75. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Heh, I was, but you almost have to an Austinite to get it. :) Maybe you are and still don't, I don't know. Anyway, I took his "live music capital of the US" to be somewhat satirical of what folks here actually say, but used the actual words used here myself to make my own point. Which is basically obvious now, that once you get out of austin, nobody's heard of it and its music scene. There's a lot of pretension here on that subject...

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  76. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by Zencyde · · Score: 1

    Houstonians seem to think differently. Although, I don't spend much time in small towns like Austin. :P So, I might have missed the "Music capitol of the world" slogan.

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  77. Re:Texas?! Environmental responsibility? Holy crap by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, mea culpa.

    I meant "similar legislation to the electronics recycling legislation being discussed in TFA."

    I guess I didn't read it enough times before posting.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  78. At least it's a better plan than in california by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where recycling here isnt free, and they wonder why people continue to actively throw out harmful substances through the trash and through the sewers. Texas has the right idea for making it "free" it'll encourage people to recycle more than what california is doing atm.

    Seriously, who though that charging people extra for recycling would make them eager to do it?technically you cant through away TVs or computer monitors, but I see it done all the time and the trash collectors could give less a shit.

  79. Re: Texas does something progressive by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

    Are you saying small businesses shouldn't have to recycle or pay a recycling tax because they are small businesses?

    I'm saying that Dell and HP stand to gain if laws like this are passed, because they are huge corporations and can achieve massive economies of scale that the little guys can't match. (Dell is particularly good at shaving costs down -- they have made it into an art form.)

    That's not to say mandatory recycling programs are a bad idea. I'm just stating what I think the motivations are for making the law.

  80. Re: Texas does something progressive by kabocox · · Score: 1

    I'm saying that Dell and HP stand to gain if laws like this are passed, because they are huge corporations and can achieve massive economies of scale that the little guys can't match. (Dell is particularly good at shaving costs down -- they have made it into an art form.)

    Um, that sounds silly. Of course corporations can use economy of scale to bring the price down! Of course, I could start a home business in my bedroom that doesn't mean that I should magically start off equal with mega corp. You have to do this thing call work and growth and then get those tiny home businesses to be actual small businesses before you can even dream of competing with mega corp on economy of scale.

    Economy of scale and other things that bring the price down are good for the end consumer. It's hard to compete being the little guy against that, but that doesn't mean the government should tax those really cheap products from the big boys until their price is the same as those small businesses. That'd be insane.

  81. Re:Frist Psot by mrraven · · Score: 1

    Yeah Fascism is real humanistic wasn't Mussolini nominated for a Human Rights Watch man of the year award right before that enraged mob hung him from a pole for ruining Italy?

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?