Slashdot Mirror


Best Non-Subscription DVR?

ngc5194 asks: "I'm thinking about joining the 21st century and purchasing a Digital Video Recorder. However, I DO NOT want to subscribe to any services. I understand that this will limit what my DVR can do, and I'm fine if it just acts like a solid-state VCR. Given the constraint above (no subscription services), which would be the best DVR to purchase and why?"

153 comments

  1. If you're worried about artificial limitations.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I understand that this will limit what my DVR can do, and I'm fine if it just acts like a solid-state VCR.

    Then go with mythTV. Anything else will limit you in some way.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  2. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by bsharitt · · Score: 1

    The problem with MythTV and other PC based solutions is that the box may not looks so good in the living room and particularly price.

  3. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so get a five year old laptop or something. Or a 5 year old PC and stick it in a wooden box with an open back.

    But seriously, I'm not sure how the submitter could not expect 99% of answers on slashdot to be "Myth TV," if they've ever seen a single comment here talking about DVR ever before.

  4. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a five year old laptop.... what video capture and tv out device would you recommend for it?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Other options... by Mizled · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you don't want to go the *nix route (MythTV) then there is always BeyondTV http://www.snapstream.com/ for Windows. It's a one time fee for the software and will act as a Media Center PC just like MythTV. Either option will work fine...I have found MythTV has a little more setup involved. If you don't want to build a DVR then I'm not sure if there are many options available to you.

    --
    Bite my shiny metal ass.
    1. Re:Other options... by mlts · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the Snapstream link. I am going to recommend it to a friend of mine who is Windows savvy to turn one of his older PCs into a DVR. The option to allow burning of recorded shows to DVD is a great item as well.

    2. Re:Other options... by major.morgan · · Score: 1

      I would add SageTV http://sage.tv/ along side with BeyondTV. Very nice interface, stable, easy to use. The extras (Movies, YouTube, GoogleVideo, Pictures, etc.) are all work much nicer than on the Tivo. Threw a cheap tuner card (dual analog/ATSC for $69) into a P4 2.8GHz box that wasn't being utilized, random 250GB FireWire HDD -- completely rocks the socks off of ComcastDVR/Tivo, with no monthly cost.

    3. Re:Other options... by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I've been using SageTV for almost 3 years now, and I've been pretty happy. I don't use anything besides the TV functions, though. (I use a Hauppauge 350, so I can't use for anything other than TV).

      If I were to build one today, I'd buy one of the media extenders instead of building a whole box. Cheaper (provided you already have another computer and a network in the house)and quiet.

    4. Re:Other options... by LMN8R · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I have two tuners made by different manufacturers - a Hauppauge card and an HDTV DVICO card. Both work absolutely flawlessly with BeyondTV.

      I tried the trials for both BeyondTV and SageTV and went with BeyondTV simply because it seemed to have a better interface. Also, the built-in commercial skipping feature is simply great.

  6. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by evilviper · · Score: 0, Troll

    Then go with mythTV. Anything else will limit you in some way.

    MythTV has numerous limitations of its own. It's slow and clunky, uses an odd format, and has a god-awful interface. It's so ridiculously focused on TV that you have to go up 5 levels of menus, then down 5 more, to look through the other videos you have available. And to get back to the TV programs? Yep, just as many steps.

    I find a file manager and a shell script far more user-friendly than Myth.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  7. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you have against Freevo?

  8. Missing Information... by BandoMcHando · · Score: 5, Informative

    It would be helpful to know what country you are talking about, as this will affect lots of things...

    eg here in the UK we have freeeview, which is just a brand name for free-to-air terrestrial digital television, and many DVR/PVRs over here are built with this in mind.

    But I have no idea what the situatuion is with non-subscription television services in other countries

    1. Re:Missing Information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Sky+ is going subscription free from 1st July (still need to subscribe to the normal TV package) saving £10/month.

  9. Plenty of choice out there by Snospar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use a MythTV box which was fairly hard to get working but is simple to use. It can change channels on my Sky Digibox so I can record shows automatically using the built in TV guide. I can archive recordings to DVD or play back DVD's on the same box. It cost around £400 (GBP) to build 2 years ago, with a lot of the money going on a Hauppauge PVR-350 card and a small form factor case.

    I've also bought a Pioneer DVR for my father in law, the DVR-540HX-S with 160GB hard drive, this was much the same price and does almost as much as the MythTV box including controlling a Sky box. It's also quieter and lacks the initial setup complexity of the Myth box (meaning less support for me!).

    If you want total simplicity go for the prebuilt DVR - for total control it has to be MythTV

    --
    Moore's law is not a law. Theory, yes; Predictable trend, certainly; Law, no.
    1. Re:Plenty of choice out there by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Is there anywhere that sells MythTV boxes with nice cases and all this hard work already done?

      Sounds like there would be a market for them.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Plenty of choice out there by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      In addition I would like to mention the following:
      1. if you are using a STB channel changes can be a little on the slow side.
      2. MythTV will not allow you to start and stop recordings as you wish...recording is tied to the EPG.

    3. Re:Plenty of choice out there by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      Yes

      As mentioned in the first thread, Mythic.TV sells the Dragon. It's a fully working computer and MythTV setup in a HTPC form factor (looks like a piece of stereo equipment) that is based on KnoppMyth. It's pretty nice looking and is apparently very quiet. It's pricey though (over $1k), but all the hard work has been done for you. A great way to make MythTV accessible to those who don't have the Linux know-how.

      Personally, I really enjoyed building my MythTV system. For me, it's always an ongoing project, but that's because I always have new ideas I want to try out. That's the great thing about MythTV. If you can dream it, you can do it (or at least try to).

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  10. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by PseudoThink · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a Windows user, I used GB-PVR (http://www.gbpvr.com/) for 18 months with great success. Just recently switched to Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, and am loving that too. It requires a bit more video card, though.

  11. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Informative

    box may not looks so good in the living room


    Wrong.

    and particularly price


    I can build one for ~ USD500 - 600. Admittedly without the gorgeous silverstone case.
    Not as cheap as a DVR, but no subscription. And much
    more functional.
  12. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by WarJolt · · Score: 2, Informative

    The downside of MythTV is typically you need a spare PC lying around to get it running. But there are plenty of upsides. It's free as long as you have the hardware. I have a plextor convertx m402u which works with mythtv. You can use supported capture card. Someone has to write a v4l driver for the device, but there are a bunch. If you have cable or antenna you can record one show per tuner device. You'll need a linux system to run the backend, but there is a windows frontend for it. The backend saves all the shows and captures the video. The front end is where you view the video. All you do is connect to the backend with a network. This is a lot of work to setup, but onces it's setup it gives you the freedom of having a portable DVR on your laptop connected wirelessly to a backend DVR sitting in a closet somewhere. It's definately not for everyone.

  13. Plenty of nice-looking HTPC cases out there by KlaymenDK · · Score: 3, Informative

    Regarding the article, at www.mythic.tv they sell ready-made MythTV boxes so you don't need mad linux skills. The "Dragon" comes in a Silverstone case whose beauty, I suppose, is debatable (but it's not exactly ugly). But there are plenty of nice-looking HTPC cases out there, you can even find some that look not too far from a SlimDevices Transporter.

    Just so you know...

  14. Clarify your question by Platupous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the way the poster asked the question, I just kind of gathered he wanted a non-PC based standalone DVR box.

    I know all about Myth / ATI MMC / Beyond TV etc, but I too would like to know about STANDALONE boxes, which have nothing to do with a PC.

    What's out there? Whats good?

    1. Re:Clarify your question by Kemahsabe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a Toshiba RD-XS32 with 80GB HD and DVD player/recorder. Paid $250 for it a year ago. I use it primarily as a solid-state VCR although it has many other functions. It will pause live TV. I can record a program, edit out the commercials and save it on a DVD. I've transferred video from a video camera (analog or digital) to the HD, then edited the result and saved it to a DVD. Works for me. Does more than I'd ever want or need and I don't have to pay a subscription.

    2. Re:Clarify your question by mhouseco · · Score: 1

      I've had a Panasonic DMR-EH50 for about a year now, and it has made me very happy. Includes a DVD player and recorder. Has a easy way to edit out commercials from programs on the hard drive, and then burn to DVD. I'm connected to an analog Comcast system that does not provide the free TV guide programming guide, but a co-worker has the same unit on Comcast in a different town and he says the TV guide scheduling works very well.

    3. Re:Clarify your question by Coffeehound · · Score: 1

      Replay TV is the best. It is a Video Recorder that does everything that a Tivo does with much less intrusion. If you buy an older model on ebay in the 5500 series, you can get the model that automagically skips most commercials. It will talk to your cable box, and if you buy one with the lifetime subscription ($299) it will give you weeks of TV scheduling ahead of time. You also can go to Source Forge and download the driver that lets you take out the 40 Gig drive and put in a 300 Gig and record mucho hours of video. Oh yes, if interfaces nicely with your PC using DVArchive. You can use your LAN to capture the video and watch it from your PC. It also finds video shows and movies on the subjects you like.

  15. Dreambox by huha · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't need HDVT capabilities, you might want to try the dreambox series by dream multimedia (http://www.dream-multimedia-tv.de/index_eng.php).
    They run Linux and the top-of-the-line model even features interchangeable receivers in case you'll ever need to switch from cable to sat or vice versa.
    The box is not quite cheap, but it's a nice thing to have if you don't want to set up a PC for this stuff--it just does what it's supposed to do.
    The only problem I've been having is the menu structure, which is--as most of the time with utterly complex gadgetry--way too crowded to be even somewhat intuitive. Luckily, there's a web interface, allowing you to configure and organize movies from your PC.

  16. I am UK based and have a cheap digifusion freeview PVR (£90). Its basic, but it works - I previously had a PC based PVR, using GB-PVR, but my GF could not be bothered figuring out how to use it. Bring up the program guide, highlight the program you wish to record, and hit the record button. This combined with a DivX/XVid compatible DVD player covers most of my needs. That said, I have just started using Win Media Center on my Vista laptop, for when I want to record two programs, or for things that I want to burn to DVD, and am very impressed with it. Worked no problems with the no brand USB TV Dongle that I got as a present. If I had to stop using one, it would be the laptop, as you can't beat the simplicity of the set top box.

    --
    Never rub another man's rhubarb
  17. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by catdogven · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can try out http://www.gbpvr.com/, it's a very nice dvr software for windows. It's not open source, but it's freeware. I use it at home, and i'm very pleased with it. You may have to play a little bit with the codecs, to get it working right with your tuner card.

    --
    It's never too late to stop doing something wrong, or to start doing something right.
  18. Hmm, tough choice... by HaeMaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MythTV with a $1000 PC, or $200 dual tuner TiVo with a year of prepaid service.

    Decisions, decisions.

    1. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK we don't get Tivo anymore but I can buy a freeview-based PVR (with 7-day EPG and 160gig HDD) for £180. Of course thats bought outright, theres no subsequent subscription costs.



      Or I can build a MythTV box with dual tuners and lots of processing power and RAM and a half-terabyte of storage for £300. And thats with sticking it in a non-hideous case (in my case I'm using an Antec NSK1300) :)


    2. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by Gregg+M · · Score: 3, Insightful
      MythTV with a $1000 PC, or $200 dual tuner TiVo with a year of prepaid service.

      $1000 PC?

      Who pays 1000 dollars for a PC? I paid less for my gaming rig! All you need for a MythTV is a 1 GHz pc with 256MB of ram. I could find that in the garbage these days. All you need then is a 80 dollar PVR-150 and a video card with an S-video out. Storage is about a gig an hour for mpeg2 files. Besides Tivo costs 20 bucks a month for the subscription. Once I pay for the computer I'm done.

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
    3. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      $1000 PC silliness has already been covered but since I did just buy a new PC, I feel the need to chime in. My most recent PC was an Athlon Dual Core that I bought off of Dell's outlet for $250 shipped. And that included XP Media Center. Granted, to be a decent high definition HTPC I'll need a better video card (maybe $150) and probably a bit more disk space ($100). For standard definition, I have more than enough horsepower and disk-space. I'll just need a TV tuner ($100 for a good standard def one or $30 for one that requires my computer to do all the processing work).

      But that's not even the argument that compelled me to respond in the first place. My main beef with your assessment is that you're only considering the Tivo service for one year. Why? Do you only have one year left to live? Are you planning on not watching TV anymore after the first year? Do you suspect Tivo will suddenly alter their business model and stop charging monthly fees after one year? Or are you just being incredibly shortsighted in the financial sense?

      How many years do you plan on keeping your Tivo? Maybe 3-4 years? If you bought a PC and financed the sum minus the initial $200*, for the same payments you're making to Tivo you could buy a $700 PC in 3 years. You could buy an $800 PC in 4 years. So all things being equal, I'll take the PC and the cash each month (or year if you prepay yearly).

      * Yes, I know financing a PC makes absolutely no sense given its rapid depreciation and I'd never actually do that but I would rather compare apples to pears than apples to 19th Century British Prime Ministers and I thought the financing angle at least makes the comparison more balanced. Oh, and I am assuming 8% interest on financing and the Tivo monthly amount of $14.95 for a year pre-paid.

    4. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      For those of us who aren't terribly interested in dumpster diving and don't the spare equipment laying around, how much would a bare-bones MythTV-capable system really cost?

    5. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      I build MythTV systems out for people. Here is a rough breakdown:

      HTPC case, IR remote integrated, display (VFD) integrated, $300. Note that the VFD/IR is over $100 by itself -- and the case has to be "living room acceptable".

      Power supply - main characteristic - QUIET. $40.

      Mainboard. Note that we are using this for (potentially) running multiple HD streams, and transcoding HD, so Athlon X2, and 2GB (dual channel) memory. 4 PCI slots, 1 PCIe. $100 for the mainboard/processor, $60 for memory.

      SD (standard def) TV. Dual tuner - $140 (with hardware MPEG-2 encode).

      QAM/ATSC HD tuner - $80.

      Suitable video card (full HD output) - $150

      Montego sound card (optical digital in/out) - $40

      Now, what does it sum up to? $910. Which is close to a thousand (oh, the quiet passive CPU cooling adds $30).

      What do you get? A bog-quiet box, with all sorts of A/V possibilities, that looks very nice. Run MythTV on it, which doesn't take ALL of its power (most of the time -- when transcoding you can't have enough!), so put VMware on there, and some virtual servers as well (I run XP and Solaris 10 on mine).

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    6. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the good info. That'll help me decide whether the investment in time and materials is worth it for me (I really don't watch much TV).

    7. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out that I run my MythTV server on a PIII-750 with 128mb RAM, it was free to me because it was donated from a friend who didn't use it anymore. I'd ba amazed if anyone couldn't find a similar PC for free, but even if you have to pay I agree $1000 is way out of line with reality.

    8. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by mediocubano · · Score: 1

      I got a refurbed 2-tuner 80G/80Hr TiVo box a month or so ago for $50, and the prepaid service for 1 year is $150. So your $200 is right on the money. And it took longer to fish the video cables thru the entertainment center than it did to set up/configure the box. Definitely money well spent in my opinion.

    9. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by BRTB · · Score: 1

      Newegg prices I was looking at last night (from memory, should be pretty close though):

      Motherboard - $55 (Gigabyte Socket AM2 / Micro ATX, onboard NVidia 6100 video)
      CPU - $30 (Low-end AMD Sempron AM2, plenty for Myth)
      Memory - $30 (Corsair Value-series 1GB DDR2-667)
      Hard drive - 160gb = $52, 320gb = $74, 500gb+ = $100
      Case - standard minitower is $25 at the local store; decent slim cases seem to run about $50
      DVD-ROM readers are $17, $30 if you want a DVD writer.

      Hauppauge PVR150 tuner - $59 (make sure you get an analog PVR150 and not the new HVR1600, there aren't any Linux drivers for that one yet).

    10. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

      Between my own spare hardware and a few things given to me, my MythTV box has got the following



      AMD Athlon XP 2400 - 2Ghz Socket A Processor

      Asus A7N8X Deluxe Motherboard (with digital audio output)

      2GB DDR2 RAM

      ATI TV-Wonder

      240GB (2 x 120GB) Maxtor HDDs
       



      I havent spent a dime on this machine since I bought it as my gaming rig 5 or 6 years ago and has even undergone several upgrades since. The only thing I plan on blowing any money on is a couple nice fat hard drives, and considering hard drives are easy to find at 5GB per dollar, I don't expect it to be a huge expense.

    11. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      MythTV can run on hardware you can buy on eBay for $50 total. The only expensive bit is the capture card.

    12. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      I don't if I've missed a setting or something, but my standard-def MythTV box uses 1.1GB per half hour of recording.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    13. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who pays 1000 dollars for a PC?

      The Mac dorks.

    14. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      SD (standard def) TV. Dual tuner - $140 (with hardware MPEG-2 encode).
      QAM/ATSC HD tuner - $80.
      Suitable video card (full HD output) - $150

      Could you post which video cards you find preferable for these (tuners and HD output)? I'd be interested to know what you use for the above.

    15. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the delay.

      I prefer Kworld ATSC tuner (model 110), and Adaptec hardware SD tuner (hardware MPEG2 encode). The Adaptec simply because I got a load of them cheap. There is a dual SD hardware tuner available (Hauppauge model PVR-500) that comes without a remote (because the remote is integrated into the case. I also use these.

      For video out, I use ATI x700 or better, or NVIDEO 6800 (or 5200 if HDTV output isn't needed -- quality SD output at a very good price point).

      Look for passive cooling on the video card; some vendors (not many) offer this.

      Passive cooling for the CPU (butterfly cooler), and an AMD x2 2Ghz is fine. Get lots of PCI slots on the mainboard (4 minimum).

      Best deal is to contact me (sales plug) -- my prices are reasonable, and I set up MythTV for you (and support it, 3 years parts, lifetime labour). My systems also use flash memory for the OS and application, allowing completely silent operation if the disk array is in another room (this is desirable if you want a RAID array of 1 to 3 terrabytes).

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    16. Re:Hmm, tough choice... by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Great, thanks for the info.

  19. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by galorin · · Score: 1

    Really.. I've not not noticed the up and down menu levels. Then again my remote has buttons that take me straight to my dvd player, recorded tv, live tv, video library, music library, just about everything I use often has it's own direct button. If I had more buttons then everything would.

  20. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

    What are you going to do when your TV listing service for Myth cuts their free access?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/20/192022 4

  21. no subscription takes out the advantages by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hm, lessee.

    If you buy a DVR without a subscription, and use it as a solid state VCR, you take away everything that's remotely advantageous of having a DVR, in my opinion.

    Season Pass (or the equivalent) makes recording all new showings of your favorite programs hassle free. If you're using it as a VCR, and the show ends up swapping time slots without your knowledge (you're probably ffwing through commercials that would warn you...) you risk missing the show in it's new time slot. Or if it's pre-empted by another program, or delayed, etc.

    If you're not looking to pay a subscription, just download the shows off bittorrent or usenet.

    1. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by antdude · · Score: 1

      Heh, I use a VCR and I rarely have this problem because I always check the TV guide and compare. I have had heard people, with TiVo, get their recordings messed up (e.g., missing the last few minutes, etc.). I always try to make 5 minutes and 5 minutes after the TV shows I record if possible so I won't miss anything.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Season passes let you pad the recordings by up to 5 minutes early or two hours (!) late. Not usually an issue except on Sundays during football season when the simpsons gets pushed back.

    3. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I am on Pacific zone so I have never seen The Simpsons get pushed back like that. Is that pad recordings automatic or user has to do that? Bascially, can TiVo and others automatically detect the show is being late due to sport games or whatever?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen one that can automatically detect it, but the padding is an option in every recording you set up, including season passes.

      My Tivo is sitting gathering dust because it won't change channels reliably on my hd receiver, so I dunno if they've updated the software recently.

    5. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      If you buy a DVR without a subscription, and use it as a solid state VCR, you take away everything that's remotely advantageous of having a DVR, in my opinion.

      In my opinion, it's remotely advantageous to be able to record more than fits on a videotape or DVD without manually swapping. The ability to archive recordings on a separate file server, which some DVRs offer, is also remotely advantageous.

    6. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by grahamm · · Score: 1

      The only advantage you gain from a subscription is the ability to watch subscription only channels. You do not need to use it as a solid state VCR. The EPG shows details of the programmes for up to a week in advance and most (if not all) PVRs can be programmed to record using the EPG so that if a show changes time then the recording will be at the altered time. Some PVRs also have 'series' mode so it automatically records all the episodes in a series but the repeat showings.

    7. Re:no subscription takes out the advantages by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Season Pass (or the equivalent) makes recording all new showings of your favorite programs hassle free. If you're using it as a VCR, and the show ends up swapping time slots without your knowledge (you're probably ffwing through commercials that would warn you...) you risk missing the show in it's new time slot. Or if it's pre-empted by another program, or delayed, etc.

      Wha? Certainly with MythTV, you just say "record any time on any channel" and "only new showings", and you'll never miss an episode. I assume most other software DVRs have similar functionality. It's hardly unique to TiVo.

      Point being, using a DVR "as a solid state VCR" means you get to leverage the scheduling intelligence in the DVR, something a real VCR could never do.

  22. I am also in the same shoe. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I also use the old fashion VCR and my computer (HDTV only; not 24/7 so I turn it off when I don't use it). I think once my VCR dies, I am jumping to a PVR that doesn't use subscription. I live in USA and don't have cable and satellite TV. Just the good old fashion rabbit ears and bowtie antenna. I still use a 10 years old 19" CRT TV. I will get a small HDTV when it dies.

    I was thinking of getting a DVD recorder, but I heard it is not very good because it skips or something? Also, short recording time especially for HDTV (if I ever get it)? I don't want to use my computer for recordings because I don't like to leave my machines on when I am not at home. I prefer a hardware recorder like the VCR. I don't need a fancy scheduler with TV guides like TiVo and Replay.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:I am also in the same shoe. by debest · · Score: 1

      I prefer a hardware recorder like the VCR. I don't need a fancy scheduler with TV guides like TiVo and Replay.

      Simple, then. You go and buy a hardware PVR from Best Buy or Circuit City (or wherever). There are models from Pioneer, Samsung, JVC, etc. (all the usual suspects): when you're ready, read up on the models and choose the one that best suits your needs at that time. As a bonus, you'll probably be able to get one with a DVD recorder for not that much more, so you'll have both options.
      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    2. Re:I am also in the same shoe. by Micah · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I recently got a DVD recorder (a Panasonic) and I haven't yet noticed any skipping.

      It's cool because I can play the DVDs in my laptop with Xine. :)

    3. Re:I am also in the same shoe. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Aren't these PVRs subscription based? I don't want to pay for subscription to use them.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:I am also in the same shoe. by debest · · Score: 1

      Nope. They are exactly what you described them: "solid-state" VCRs. I think you can subscribe to a service with them, but they are absolutely capable of being used stand-alone. If you can program a VCR, you'll have no problems.

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    5. Re:I am also in the same shoe. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Sweet then. I do recall that some of these brands and models use TiVo models. Is this the case or are they using their own? I will look into them deeper when the time comes (could be years).

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  23. Which country? by Idaho · · Score: 1

    You do not specify in which country you live. In the Netherlands, you can buy a wide range of DVR's for amounts between EUR 150 (crappy no-name brands) and EUR 500 (with HD support, 2 tuners, big harddisk, etc.).

    For example Samsung has quite a few, but I don't know whether they sell them only in Europe (PAL) or in other places as well. There's several other brands that sell 'em too, e.g. Sony.

    Pay attention to such things as: does it support an electronic program guide (and will this work with your cable provider), is it actually easy to capture e.g. all airings of particular shows/series, is it easy to navigate the menus or is programming it such a nightmare that you probably won't ever use it after the first week.

    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  24. For those in the UK... by IndieKid · · Score: 1

    ...BT Vision (http://www.bt.com/vision is a fairly good option, especially if you already have a subscription with BT as an ISP.

    I'm a BT internet subscriber and got my Freeview-supporting DVR from BT a few months ago for £90 installation fee (the box was free), but apparently there will be a self-install option later this year that will bring the cost down to about £30.

    The BT solution also connects to your DSL line and allows on-demand (pay-per-view or subscription) viewing of TV and Movie content (plus Premiership football later this year) at near-DVD quality. Apparently some HD content may be added in the future but this will be downloaded to the DVR rather than streamed.

    I won't go into more detail on the box as there are loads of reviews around the net, but one of the nice features is the HDMI output which upscales the Freeview picutre to 720p or 1080i (there are only test broadcasts in the Croyden area of HD Freeview at the moment) and also displays the interface in the higher resolution.

    P.S. I'm not affiliated with BT in any way, just a satisfied customer.

  25. I still love TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though they discontinued their "lifetime" subscription option, I still use it on the 3 boxes I own and wouldn't think of using anything else. To get a lifetime subscription now you need to buy a TiVo box off eBay which has already had the lifetime subscription purchased for it. Also, if you buy a new unactivated box from Humax you are eligible to buy a lifetime subscription for $300 while these boxes are still available.

  26. OnAir by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

    OnAir HDTV Creator:
    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=69 5589

    I tend to find with most AV questions, if I just cruise AVSforum long enough I find the best of breed and a long list of posts praising it. Such is the case here.

  27. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG, what an eye turd. Whatever happened to elegant, slim, non-clunky devices?

  28. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by jasonwea · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry but I've got to ask the question: How many years since the last time you used MythTV? I find MythTV very easy to use[1].

    It's slow and clunky

    I run a shared backend and frontend on my Athlon 2000 server which has 3 tuners. When I have 3 recordings active it takes a couple of seconds to start playing a video but other than that..

    uses an odd format

    My DVB-T recordings come out as bog standard MPEG-2 files. If you're using analog tuners, there are tools available to transcode the Nupple format. mythtranscode even comes with MythTV and has a GUI frontend called MythArchive that can even burn video DVDs.

    and has a god-awful interface

    I'm running the MePo Theme on my frontend and I love it.

    It's so ridiculously focused on TV that you have to go up 5 levels of menus, then down 5 more, to look through the other videos you have available.

    This is a gross exaggeration. See the screenshots linked to above. "Media Library" contains "Watch Recordings" which is for TV recordings (third screenshot) and the next item down is "Watch Videos" which lists all my XviD, VIDEO_TS, etc files as they are laid out on disk from my file server (which happens to be the same box).

    And to get back to the TV programs? Yep, just as many steps.

    Press the back button twice (once to leave Videos, again to return to Main Menu). Or if you have spare keys on your remote, you can bind buttons to jump straight to whatever screen you want.

    [1] Yes it is harder to setup than some other solutions and there's far more configuration options that can be a bit confusing (hint: defaults are generally fine).

    If you can get your tuners working (I'll assume DVB tuners) in Xine or similiar or even just scanning correctly (tzap, scan), it's an apt-get and 10 minutes of configuring your channels and playing with some preferences to suit your taste. There's many howtos out there on how to do all this.

    </rant>

    Edit: I forgot the obligatory "I know I'm going to be modded down for this" :)
  29. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by crypticgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You think an application called MythTV is ridiculously focused on TV? Huh? It takes two levels to look at other videos. From the main menu you go to Media Library then Watch Videos. Then you select a video to watch. The interface pretty easy to use, I don't know what more you want. MythTV is certainly not slow for me...even on a cheap moderately powered P4 based system which I use. I found the format, while not straight mpeg, is easy to work with. I've made numerous clips from tv shows using avidemux2 and it works just fine. I've heard nothing but the same from everyone I've helped set it up for. Your experience seems to be oddly negative, and I'm sorry that it was for whatever reason. Does your shell script grab listings data and record your favorite shows? Does it have conflict resolution? Does it support multiple tuners? What about commercial detection algorithms? Is it maintained by an enthusiastic community? Is it as easy to use as tivo? Could my mom, who uses mythtv, use it? I somehow doubt it.

  30. Absolute minimum PVR by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Hmmm... nothing more than a VCR? Well, you could try:

    sleep 13453; dd if=/dev/video of=tv_show.mpg bs=1000 count=1000000
  31. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by cowbutt · · Score: 1
    What are you going to do when your TV listing service for Myth cuts their free access?

    Use the DVB Electronic Programme Guide retrieved over the air. At least, that's the way we'd do things in Europe.

  32. Elgato's EyeTV (Macintosh only) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know most people will mod me down for this, but I've got a Mac Mini and Elgato's EyeTV and it's been running beautifully for the past couple of years recording regular cable TV for me. I know it's not rocket science, but I especially like that it records a minute before & after my scheduled times to cover any slightly-off clocks or NBC's mucking around with the start times of their shows. 1Gig of disk space for every half hour recorded and multiple EyeTVs can be chained together so you can record multiple channels at the same time (or watch another one) ... it does all the encoding in hardware and doesn't use the Mac CPU for anything except display

  33. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    I bought a ReplayTV 4500 on eBay for around $200. There's no way I could have built a rig myself that inexpensively which does everything the ReplayTV does. Sure, they're not making the hardware any longer, but it did come with lifetime activation, worth $299. The company is still in business, but no longer selling hardware; they have ReplayPC now which I think is around $50 plus $20 per year, not a bad solution either if you're building (but if you're building you might as well go with Myth).

    I absolutely love the auto-commercial skip feature! (Myth has this also.) Just don't get the 5500 model, as it was removed from that release in an attempt to stave off the lawsuits; they "lost", folded and were bought by the company now providing ReplayPC. (Lost in quotes because they ran out of money defending themselves, so the trial didn't need to finish...)

    With the ReplayTV, you can use DVArchive to transfer shows to your PC; they're in MPEG-2 format, ready to burn to DVD. You can set it up to auto-download as well.

    If you're worried about them gathering data on how you watch (for instance freeze-framing the money shots, etc.) then just watch on your PC with VLC. But then you don't get the commercial skip functionality. However, it does download the index file, so I suppose someone could add that to VLC. Other than the "viewing habits" data it sends back it doesn't seem to have any "limiting" features, like broadcast flag support etc.

    I've also heard good things about Vista's Media Center, but haven't used it myself.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  34. Has to be Topfield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've owned three PVRs and Topfield has been way better than the other two brands.

    Why? - easy to use interface (even my wife can operate it)
                  reliable
                  functions can be customised with TAPs (Topfield applications)

    I essentially use it as solid state VCR but the time shifting function is what makes it so useful.

  35. Forget about Zap2It by PadRacerExtreme · · Score: 1
    Pretty amusing this appears on the front page 10 stories after the one that says Zap2it is shutting down and pondering:

    Without a data feed of this type, users will be reduced to scraping websites at best. Is this going to be a killing blow for MythTV?"

    --
    Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.
    1. Re:Forget about Zap2It by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      While I can't speak for the US - as has been mentioned above it'll make precisely bugger all difference here in the UK - Theres the XMLTV stuff which give a 14-day EPG and besides that, Freeview (the free digital TV service in the UK) broadcasts an OTA EPG that Myth works quite happily with. I'm currently in the process of building a Myth box at home :)

  36. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by knorthern+knight · · Score: 3, Informative
    Analog TV goes off the air in the USA Feb 17, 2009 and Canada Aug 31, 2011. North of the Rio Grande, you'll be using an ATSC TV set. In the USA, and in major Canadian cities, the old NTSC TV stations are already being double-banked with digital ATSC (in many cases HDTV) equivalants, so digital is a reality now. ATSC tuners can pull in PSIP data. To quote from the website...

    PSIP (Program and System Information Protocol) PSIP is a standard set by the ATSC that provides a methodology for transporting DTV system information and electronic program guide data. It allows broadcasters to identify themselves when you tune their channel. It can be information such as call letters and channel number. It can also convey up to 16 days of programming information. Consumer receiver manufacturers can use PSIP data to display interactive program guides to aid navigation of channels in the DTV receiver.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  37. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by NinjaTariq · · Score: 1

    You can get some very cool looking cases which look just like dvd players, stick a pc based blue-ray or hddvd player in it and a hard drive and whatever you can also have a high def player as well as a dvr box.

    Yes it would be expensive, but you could probably replace one of your other devices with it.

  38. This might be a stretch by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    I might be stretching the definition of "non-subscription" but Dish Network now has their "DVR Advantage" plan where for $49.99 you get 250 channels + your locals + a dual tuner DVR. Having use the Dish522, Dish622, MythTV and a few different Tivo's...I have to say my preference goes to the Dish DVR's. I have a 622 (the HD MPEG4 one) and I love it.

    1. Re:This might be a stretch by ironwill96 · · Score: 1

      I agree. DISH DVRs are pretty nice (assuming you have DISH of course!).

      You can also buy the 622 HD DVR (300 hours standard recording, 30 hours of HD content) off of e-bay for around $300 so it is considerably cheaper than the MythTV solution or buying the HD TIVO ($799.99 from them directly).

      Now I guess "satellite" does count as a subscription, but you have to get the channels somehow, right?

      --
      "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    2. Re:This might be a stretch by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that those 300 hours SD/30 hours HD are based on MPEG2 channels. Since Dish is moving more and more of their HD channels to MPEG4 (and at the end of the year will have a full MPEG4 offering for customers) that will push it to around 600 hours/60 hours.

    3. Re:This might be a stretch by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      If you're some kind of nut who only has the will to access broadcast TV, and have no interest for even basic cable services or basic dish services which can be had for as little as $14.99/mo depending on provider, then you're missing most of the worthwhile programs to record in the first place. If all you watch are the most promoted broadcast TV shows, skip the DVR entirely and just get your programs from iTunes or something similar. Of course, if you're so far gone that a $14.99 subscription to get interference free TV with 20-50 channels is too much money, and are satisfied with the 6 channels your rabbit ears pick up on a good day, then your likely to not have DSL anyway so this really isn't an option, is it?

      If you're so strongly against paying any subscriptions, then you are a cheap ass (no offense) and why should ANY manufacturer expect that you would buy a $200+, bottom of the line, profitless device from them, let alone provide it subscription free? You're such a small market nich, and a so entirely unprofitable one at that, what would compel them to bother?

      Fact is, bundling a DVR with even the cheapest subscription TV service available won't be more than $24.99 per month, with $10 of that being the monthly fee for the set top box. For another $20 a month, you get over a hundred channels instead of 20. Assuming you're not a nut, and actually have some pay-for TV service already, then the $10 a month it costs to get a DVR from your provider will cost less over 2 years than the cost to buy a simple DVR that might do without a subscription, and 3-5 years of TV vs building your own HTPC with Myth TV. With Time Warner Cable like I have, the HD DVR is the same monthly price as the regular DVR and you get all the broadcast TV channels and Discovery in HD, just not ESPN and the other premium HD networks.

      Here are a few other things to consider when getting a unit from your cable provider on lease instead of buying a Tivo or some other unit: 1) no up front expense, 2) Unit is under warranty, and is replaced free, in your home, 3) you can swap the unit out for a newer or better model at will by stopping by the cable office. If you have satellite, you actually "buy" the unit from them when you sign up (it's usually free on new accounts), but as long as you have a subscription to their service, the hardware is covered by warranty. People that already have satellite service, and are being told they have to buy their additional hardware are missing the fine print: Cancel your subscription, then have your wife sign up as a new subscriber and get all the equipment for free.

      The one major disadvantage of getting a provided DVR is that you can't export video easily to DVD. Most units employ copy protection measures. If you have a steroe system with video in-out options, you can connect the DVD recorder to your stereo instead of the cable box directly and 9/10 eliminate that issue. If not, add an inline filter you can pick up at BestBuy for $40.

      Going the Myth TV route requires several hundred dollars in PC hardware, if not over $1000 (if you're talking multiple tuners), intimate PC knowledge, constant maintenance, no real warranty or service options, and all this just so you can record to DVD? Shit, just spend $2 per episode (or save money and buy season sets). Of course, you're violating your service provider's contract terms (and possibly the law) by time shifting programs to a system capable of DVD recording and playback anyway, so if you're already violating the law, some of you might consider getting the programming through illegal download services anyway.

      Ask yourself, is it really worth the cost? The PC needs replacement every few years, or at least expensive upgrades. At an average of $500 per year in hardware and software (normalized) you could buy a new Tivo with the yearly subscription built in every year, and include the cost of a DVD writer and a few hundred DVDs.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    4. Re:This might be a stretch by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Channel changes are generall faster on STB PVR's thus better suited for surfers.

    5. Re:This might be a stretch by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Surfing on a PVR? Doesn't that, like, completely defeat the point?

    6. Re:This might be a stretch by demon · · Score: 1

      Here are a few other things to consider when getting a unit from your cable provider on lease instead of buying a Tivo or some other unit: 1) no up front expense,

      Yes, and most use crappy Scientific Atlanta boxes, or slightly less crappy Motorola boxes. If you're okay with that, then more power to ya, but I'm not.

      2) Unit is under warranty, and is replaced free, in your home,

      Unfortunately, in the case of the cableco DVRs, from what I've heard you need this - I've heard of so many people with them that have had *multiple* cableco DVRs fail with no explanation, only to call up the cableco, have it swapped out, and awhile later die pretty much the same way. The cableco has no useful explanation as to why, of course.

      3) you can swap the unit out for a newer or better model at will by stopping by the cable office.

      This is nice, but there's something to be said for keeping your unit - especially when it's a DVR, (presumably) chock full of things you actually want to watch, like my S3 TiVo is (HD movies and concerts from HDnet/HDnet Movies, all of Planet Earth in HD, several IFC movies, other DiscoveryHD programs, the latest episode of "The Closer", and so forth). If I had to replace my HD DVR, I'd be pissed.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    7. Re:This might be a stretch by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      though I agree that the Sci Atlanta boxes are inferior to Tivo or other name brand retail systems, it's a lot better than $14/mo and there's no advertising, promotional crap, or other bothers associated with the unit. I've had 4 different Sci Atlanta models, currently have 2 HD ones. I have not had any issues with any of them, other than I had a HDD failure in one 3 years ago. that has WD's fault, not Time Warner (bad drive). That can happen to any unit.

      With another cable company I had a non-HD Motorola box. Those boxes were recalled due to an issue where the 12 volt AC current running the CPU fan could back feed through the RCA out jacks and fry HT systems. It fried mine, but the cable company promptly bought me a hole new rack unit after they confirmed their hardware damaged mine.

      The original Tivos and some other set top boxes distribted by other vendors had some pretty hairy issues too. The current boxes distributed by Time warner and CableVision seem to be very stable, easy to use, and have a ton of storage space.

      As far as reliability in general, the only issue is the hard disk. These are all cheap, low voltage drives, regardless of whose system you buy. They're all about as equally likely to fail. Some of the cable boxes get re-used a few times, and that can lead to issues, but I always insist on a new box when they give me one.

      As far as having a lot of unwatched TV on my box when I exchange them, I usually do this at mid-season breaks when I have little recorded. There are 2-3 times a year I'll find I have nothing to watch in my list.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  39. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by afidel · · Score: 1

    Any of the hardware based USB devices with a PCCARD->USB2 adapter. Even at the full data rate of my Hauppauge PVR card it's only ~2.5MB/s which even a laptop HDD can sustain. The only problem might be displaying the content as a laptop of that vintage may or may not have enough hardware acceleration in the video card to assist the anemic processor at displaying high bandwidth MPEGII.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  40. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by shadow349 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not as cheap as a DVR, but no subscription. Of course, this misses one huge hidden cost .... electricity.

    Most embedded boxes (Cable set-top DVRs, Tivo, etc) are built using specialized components and consume much less power than a home-built MythTV unit.

    I've done a few tests with various units (Comcast DVR, Tivo, Myth box) and found there is about a 150W difference between home-brew and embedded. .150kW * 24 hr * 365 days * $.15 kWh / 12 mo = $16.425 / mo

    So the electricity for that that "free" MythTV box actually costs $16.43 more per month than a embedded device.

    Yes, you can do a lot more with a MythTV box, but don't try and kid yourself that it doesn't cost as much as other solutions.
  41. Before SuperKendall wakes up: Mac mini + Elgato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Before SuperKendall wakes up, here's what he (or another Apple fanboy) would probably recommend: a Mac Mini plus Elgato EyeTV.

    Why this is a good option:

    • It looks nice. (Both the mini and the EyeTV.)
    • It's an Apple product. It's insanely great! It just works! Think different! [Insert silly slogan here.]
    Why this is a lousy option:
    • It's expensive for the DVR features you get. The $600 mini only has 512MB of memory, a DVD/CDRW combo drive, and 60GB hard drive. A mini with a DVD burner starts at $800. The EyeTV 250 is $200 and is analog-only.
    • The nice little mini form factor only accepts a notebook hard drive in its case. A decent desktop hard drive requires an external Firewire/USB drive, which fricks up that neat form factor.
    • EyeTV's software is nice on most computer displays, but is pretty lousy on most televisions while sitting on the couch. It's nowhere near as good as TiVo, MythTV, or Windows Media Center.
  42. DVR for PC by bbroerman · · Score: 1

    Personally, since I'm kind of stuck in the Windows arena currently, I use SageTV. It is very stable, very functional, and not encumbered by any sort of DRM.

    --
    Logic is the beginning of reason, not the end of it.
    1. Re:DVR for PC by davonshire · · Score: 1

      I am currently testing SageTV as well, and I'm very tempted to buy the package. It does require some extensive tweaking and adjustments. But by and large it's EPG is non subscription and it's intelligent recording has already guessed that I like Family Guy and Futurama. (Neither I have chosen to record with it yet.)

      As I understand it there is also a fairly worthy package called Meedio Pro, who's technology was purchased by Yahoo. http://www.meedio.com/home.html I haven't
      tested it yet, but I will before I decide which to buy.

  43. Oh Oh, Read Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For a stand alone digital VCR here is the best solution.

    Go here http://justdeals.com/Items/gs_ptv100? and get yourself a series 1 Tivo. $60

    Buy a big IDE hard drive from newegg.com $50 - $??

    Buy some DIY software from http://www.9thtee.com/tivo-instantcake.htm. $20

    The Series 1 Tivo does not require a subscription to work. You can schedule recordings for a channel, time, and duration. So now you have a piece of hardware built just for recording TV without a monthly fee. In the future if you decide to subscribe and get all the cool Tivo features, you can.

  44. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Steve525 · · Score: 1

    I'd also add that GB-PVR (and SageTV, too) support the Hauppauge MVP. For those who already have a computer running Windows in the house this is a cheap option. Just $70 for a (hardware encoding) video card and $90 for the MVP and you're done. Add a bit more if you go with SageTV and/or a wireless network, (and you may end up wanting a large hard drive, too).

  45. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by rlp · · Score: 1

    the box may not looks so good in the living room

    I'm using an old Shuttle SK43G (silver) which looks fine in the living room. A slightly more pertinent concern is finding a unit with a quiet fan for the living room.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  46. Mod parent up by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

    (how on earth did they get to be posting at -1 anyway?)

    There's less traffic in Digitalspy's PVR forums than there used to be, but it's still useful.

    Also check links and reviews here:
    http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/technology/dvrs/review s/

    and:
    http://www.pvrjunction.co.uk/compare/

  47. WMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You asked on Slashdot, so you're going to get a lot of MythTV responses (which is great, it's an outstanding free product). I'd also suggest you check out Windows Media center (Either 2005 (XP), or Vista Media Center if that's your cup of tea), especially if you're into home automation and want device support (I can control my lutron lighting, HAI system, etc all through Media Center, including scheduling it). It also will stream HD (including protected content, like CableCard recorded stuff on Vista) to Xbox 360s or any other Media Center V2 device.

  48. Consider replacable media by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most DVRs are sealed and the storage is recycled. As long as you have your receiver in a different box, you can get a replaceable media DVR. Several manufacturers are making DivX compatible home DVD burners, Phillips being the cheapest right now. You can get 12+ hours of standard broadcast or 6 hours of HD material on a single DVD. You can rotate through a box of 10 DVD/RWs and get about the same storage you get with a satellite provider DVR unit, and you can permanently burn anything on regular DVDs (including multisession capability). I screwed up and got the read-only unit for $50. I could have gotten the burner for $150. I'm sorry I didn't, despite already owning a Dish Network receiver/DVR. As an added bonus with these units, you can load a single DVD with MP3s and get over 24 hours of continuous music. And it's worth noting that you can get format converters that will take pretty much any video format and convert it to any other, including DivX, so you can download eleventy seven gubbabytes of stuff and make it watchable on your home unit. For Winboxes DivX sells a passable converter, and eRightSoft gives away an absolutely jam packed converter (actually a front end for just about any OSS codec/format converter already available).

    Any argument about DivX vs. another format is moot unless there's another format being built into home replaceable media recorders. And as for the false permanence of DVDs, if you follow the listing at http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=178622 you can get media that lasts 10 times longer than the commonly available 2 to 3 year lifetime disks.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Consider replacable media by Samus · · Score: 1

      I don't recommend it. I thought I could go the semi-cheap route with DVD/RWs but it hasn't really worked out. I bought a Toshiba DVD recorder last Christmas and have been unimpressed. First the RWs it needed have to be a higher speed than you normally find on store shelves. The only ones I found that would do it were 4x made for video recording RWs. They worked out fine for a bit but after recording and erasing around 4 shows on the same disc, the recorder can't use the disc anymore. I'm not a fool and understand that every time a disc is written to it degrades but I had no idea that they would degrade so fast. I don't think the discs are so degraded that I couldn't use them on a PC. Its more likely that the recorder just can't write to the degraded disc fast enough and it freezes up. I wish that I had gone the PVR or DVR with HD route now. It would have been more expensive but I think it would have worked out better.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    2. Re:Consider replacable media by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      I don't suggest the semi-cheap route either. Most of it's junk. The Phillips unit happens to be cheap non-junk. Most of the other DivX capable home units cost US$100 to US$300 more than the corresponding units from other manufacturers. I haven't tried them, either plain reader or reader/burner, so I can't evaluate them here. I can say that the output and durability of the Phillips unit is as good as I've seen anywhere. And I've been in electronics professionally. sales and repair, for 42 years off and on. The output is probably bettter than what the TV can show, unless it's a spectacular plasma or something.

      Disk degradation has nothing to do with the unit. They'd degrade just sitting there. The link I provided pointer out objective testing on many disks and found only 1, the TY disks, to have a retention of 20 to 30 years, whereas most others had a 2 to 3 year retention. For RW disks, testing and comparison is here: http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Specific.a spx?ArticleId=13934

      Seems that first burning is crucual for subsequent burnings. Many disks degrade around the 5th nto 10th burn, but most of those recover in subsequent burnings, up to the limit of their tests, 100 burns (on in somr cases, 280 burns.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  49. Two Box Approach by Xesdeeni · · Score: 1

    I put an HD (no hyphen) DVD Media Player (Sigma Designs based) in my Living Room and networked it to my HTPC. That way what the HTPC looks like doesn't matter. I use the Ziova Z500, but the other brands (IOData, Buffalo, DVICO, etc.) have their benefits as well. They play SD DVDs, and HD in MPEG-2 (TS), MPEG-4 (some support h.264), WMV (some support VC-1), and DivX (either over the network or from red-laser DVDs I can burn without breaking the bank).

    The HTPC contains digital tuners and big honkin' hard drives.

    As a bonus, I'm sticking it to the HD-DVD and BluRay camps.

    Xesdeeni

  50. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by fredklein · · Score: 1

    I've done a few tests with various units (Comcast DVR, Tivo, Myth box) and found there is about a 150W difference between home-brew and embedded. .150kW * 24 hr * 365 days * $.15 kWh / 12 mo = $16.425 / mo

    Firstly, I don't know how you can say that, considering "home brewed" systems vary.

    Second, according to http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/cost.html , "The average cost of residential electricity was 9.86/kWh in the U.S. in March 2006." The 3 highest rates rates were "12 in California, 14.314 in New York, and 16.734 in Hawaii." So, your "$.15 kWh" figure is potentially WAY off.

    3rd, You'd still be wrong- PCs have Power Saving features built into them. A simple Suspend or Hibernate can make the power requirement drop to near zero. This would affect the monthly power requirement in unpredictable ways- a single person who sleeps 8 hrs a day, and works 8 hrs a day could have their TVPC (heh, I made that up. Sounds friendlier than 'HTPC') essentially powered off for 16 hours a day. Or thay could actually power it off (unless a recording session is planned). A busy family with kids might have the TVPC up and running playing/recording kids shows all day long, and recording shows for the adults (plural) all evening/night.

  51. DVR cable box by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    if you have cable you can get them and you just have to pay the box rental fee.

    1. Re:DVR cable box by demon · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  52. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by skiingyac · · Score: 1

    thats what the MediaMVP is for http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_media mvp.html. It is the about 1"x6"x6", ~$50, and is basically a client for a VNC-like protocol. MythTV and GB-PVR both support it. Run a network cable to it, use your existing PC as the server (doesn't use up a whole lot of resources).

  53. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    There is only one problem with MythTV...it is a slave to the EPG.

    MythTV does not allow you to start and stop recording as you wish...you are forced to record the entire program that was in progress at the time you pressed the record button.

    MythTV does what it does very well however, it is not the be all end all PVR/DVR as it is made out to be.

  54. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    Like one of the other posters mentioned, there are some sharp looking case solutions out there for a MythBox however, the price is another thing.

    Spending up to $1000 on a nice looking case to find out it doesnt do what you want can be disappointing.

  55. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    Not sure why anyone would want to run WMC over MythTV but to each their own I guess.

  56. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by demon · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately in the US, that'd make far too much sense - we have to have our own different standards. If only we could cooperate on those kinds of standards - it took us years to get RDS, and other things that Europeans have taken for granted for many years.

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  57. Don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how this issue doesn't affect me at all.

    AT&T U-verse comes with a DVR as a standard feature of the service. Given that U-verse is far, far better than cable, I don't see why I'd ever want to switch.

  58. I use... by MacColossus · · Score: 1

    I am a mac user and have used this. http://www.formac.com/webapp/products_av_studiodv. php It integrates automated recording/scheduling with titantv.com. My computer room is close to the tv room with a unfinished utility room adjacent to both. So I have this going from the satellite receiver to the Mac Pro's firewire port. I have the second DVI out from the video card going back to the TV so I can watch the video from the computer's hard drive on the TV. I use ILife to edit the video and burn to DVD when I want. The major missing feature to this is commercial skip. But, I already had everything except the studiodv. OK, I had a Dual G4 when I first set this up, and have since had it hooked up to G5's and such as I upgrade, but you know what i mean. :-)

  59. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by SparkyFlooner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2 reasons:

        * WMC is really nice
        * I don't have to learn to use another OS to use it

  60. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Goose42 · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather have (and currently do have) a D-Link DSM320. It does everything that Hauppauge unit does, plus a few extra formats, component video, optical SPDIF audio, and wireless networking. Of course, it costs a little more (about $180 CDN), but I've definitely been enjoying it.

    Its good to know D-Link does have some (admittedly weak) competition outside of the build-your-own crowd.

  61. MOXI by Motorola by __aazsiv8125 · · Score: 1

    I have a Charter Cable service, and they provide a really nice DVR for about 7 bucks a month. They recently updated the firmware, and it's been really great. There's no subscription other than the $7 a month you pay to rent the box. Comcast and TimeWarner also have their own DVRs. My recommendation is to simply go with whatever DVR is provided by your satellite/cable provider.

  62. Some pitfalls of rolling your own by jbarr · · Score: 4, Informative

    MythTV, BeyondTV, SageTV (my preferred), Windows Media Center, and any of a number of PC-based solutions are available to provide subscription-free DVR capabilities. But it doesn't come easy. Just be aware that Satellite companies and Cable companies are not making it easy for roll your own users. If you have local OTA or analog cable signals, it should be a no-brainer to set up the channels and the inputs, but if you use set top boxes (STB) you introduce some complexity that goes way beyond Joe Sixpack's capabilities. You need a way to control the STB's, so you either need to use IR blasters or serial/USB control which varies from STB to STB.

    If you want a completely compatible DVR, then you really need to go with one supplied from your Cable or Satellite provider. Of course, that goes against your "no subscription" requirements. You typically have to pay a subscription, and you cannot typically "do anything" with the recordings other than watching them (like transcoding to an iPod, burning to DVD, etc.) But you do get 100% compatibility. And if you want to record HD content, be prepared for disappointment. Unless you use a cable or satellite provided DVR, you WILL NOT be able to record most Cable or Satellite HD content without their proprietary DVR's. There really is no exception to this (in the consumer-level price range.) If you have local broadcast HD content or unencrypted HD content over cable (satellite encrypts it all) you will NOT be able to (inexpensively or easily) roll your own HD DVR for recording. The excellent HDHomeRun box does a fantastic job of providing recordable content to such PC-based DVR's but it requires "clear" signals--no premiums, unless your cable company inadvertently leaves them unencrypted. And though HDHomeRun is an excellent product, it's certainly not Joe Sixpack-friendly.

    I have an amazing SageTV setup that the wife just LOVES, but I dread the day when I have to switch from cable to DirecTV (which may be sooner than later) because of the technical tweaking and changes I'll need to make to accommodate multiple DirecTV receivers. And, of course, we will NOT be able to record HD. That will have to be done with a DirecTV HD DVR.

    For me, it was all about features, so we weer willing to incur extra cost, but if it's about the cost, then you really need to assess which is more economical. So, calculate how much it will cost you to build a subscription-free setup, and then amortize that cost over say, two or three years, and see which is cheaper, the home-built subscription-free DVR, or a subscription.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Some pitfalls of rolling your own by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      I would like to add that channel changing speeds to a STB might not be acceptable for folks that are channel surfers rather than folks that record all their tv and watch it at their leisure.

  63. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by legoburner · · Score: 1

    I'll add to this by mentioning that in many cases, thanks to the client/server setup of mythtv, you can just put a few TV cards in your file (or other) server which you might already have at home (like I did) and then use a very efficient client based around VIA/mini-itx for the frontend, which is still a bit more than a set top box, but is still an improvement.

  64. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Question. Does anyone know if there's an HD tuner/capture card that does *NOT* implement broadcast flag?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  65. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by nugx · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Apple is pretty lax on software DRM. I have been using OSX since 10.0 and I have never been asked to enter a serial number. Windows, on the other hand, I've registered hundreds of times over the years.

  66. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 1

    I use a Hauppauge WinTV PVR USB2 for capture, and the built in headphone jack and S-Video output (nVidia Geforce4 Go, I believe) for output. I currently use GB-PVR on Windows since the Linux driver for this capture card only recently became complete enough for my use, and I really have very few complaints.

  67. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Scrape tvguide.com or some other web-based listing service. Myth existed before labs.zap2it was borne, and it will exist long after it dies (assuming some other solution isn't reached).

  68. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by BeansBaxter · · Score: 1

    Uhm all of them. The flag was ruled out of the jurisdiction of the FCC.
    from cnet.com http://news.com.com/Court+yanks+down+FCCs+broadcas t+flag/2100-1030_3-5697719.html/
    update In a stunning victory for hardware makers and television buffs, a federal appeals court has tossed out government rules that would have outlawed many digital TV receivers and tuner cards starting July 1.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that the Federal Communications Commission did not have the authority to prohibit the manufacture of computer and video hardware that doesn't have copy protection technology known as the "broadcast flag." The regulations, which the FCC created in November 2003, had been intended to limit unauthorized Internet redistribution of over-the-air TV broadcasts.

    As far as I know the broadcast flag was never even turned on.

  69. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by skiingyac · · Score: 1

    I'm glad the MediaMVP has competition too... I don't need the wireless and probably never will, but the fancier outputs will come in handy in the future. What about the interface? Can it be customized or do you have to do everything through D-Link's software? One of the best things about the MediaMVP is that it is a VNC client (with some additions to the protocol to stream audio/video), so your PC can display any interface you like, which is why GB-PVR can turn it into a DVR with all the features of a Tivo.

  70. Windows MCE 2005 & XBox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a computer with Windows Media Center 2005 and an xbox 360, you have a setup already. The MCE PC will do all the recording, etc, and still allow you to watch tv etc on the computer its self. Then you can also have it stream the recorded or live TV to the xbox 360. Great way to watch TV or movies in the other room, especially if you don't have a cable outlet near by. MCE also supports multipul tuner cards. the only downside is you can't get MCE 2005 unless it comes preinstalled on the PC. I've tried just to see what the combo was like and you only get a 60 day trial with a copy w/o a key.

  71. windows vista by sankekur · · Score: 1

    Im using windows vista home premium with a ATI tuner card and it works wonderfully, its about the only thing vista is good for lol
    and to my suprize the recordings are not DRM protected. at least for the shows I record.

  72. MCE 2005 by DuckWizard · · Score: 1

    You WILL be happy if you go with Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005. It's probably the best piece of software that Microsoft has ever made. I know that's not saying much, but this is a quality product.

    Stay away from Vista at all costs. I can't speak to MythTV, but I suspect MCE 2005 is a bit simpler to use and maintain. HDTV support, analog TV support, with all manner of tuners available (even QAM with the right hardware). I just have USB tuners connected to mine (one analog, one digital) and it works like a dream. The interface is really well-done and easy to setup and use. The MCE remote (which would cost you a bit extra, but I recommend) is responsive and well-configured.

    I recommend going with an Intel system - dual core and pretty quick. Get an Nvidia accelerator and purchase the PureVideo codecs as well. I love AMD and ATi, but I have found that Nvidia is the way to go for the video card (better MPEG acceleration) and my intel box never BSODs after weeks of uptime while my AMD one does from time to time (although this is not necessarily related to the processor). You might even want to get a pre-built system from someone (i.e. Dell) because it will be very quiet (and this is difficult to accomplish on your own).

  73. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    use a very efficient client based around VIA/mini-itx for the frontend, which is still a bit more than a set top box, but is still an improvement.

    Not to mention that there are now purpose-built devices for that, such as the AppleTV, Slingbox, etc. You just have to do some research to find one that works with MythTV.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  74. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by toleraen · · Score: 1

    a single person who sleeps 8 hrs a day, and works 8 hrs a day could have their TVPC...essentially powered off for 16 hours a day.

    Here I thought the point of having a DVR was to record all the stuff you couldn't watch because you were asleep or at work. I guess I've been doing it wrong all this time!

    Anyway, it's not like Tivos don't have power buttons. The same power saving techniques you could use on a PC could also be used on a 'traditional' DVRs, so you still end up using more electricity with a PC.

  75. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Turning off (or even hibernating) a DVR manages to completely miss the point of a DVR: automated recording. If I wanted to manually turn on a device every time I needed to record a TV show, I'd still use a VCR instead of owning a TiVo.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  76. Pay TV by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    In my experience, you'll need a subscription DVR if you have pay channels like HBO, or if you get HDTV over cable. If all you care about is basic cable (standard definition,) or over-the-air TV; you should be all set with a non-subscription DVR.

  77. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    A date thats been pushed back 4 or 5 times now? And the vast majority of TV owners still don't have digital hardware? It ain't happening once again, it'll be pushed back another 2 years.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  78. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about those people with basic analog NTSC cable? The cut-off date only applies to over-the-air NTSC transmissions, and I don't see cable companies cutting off their NTSC cable plans anytime soon.

  79. DVR: Pay to wait? by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

    I have a "DVR". Its a Windows Vista Premium bx hooked into two digital set-top boxes. Its really nice. I have Blu-Ray and HD-DVD hooked into it too.

    But when I get back from vacation in two weeks, I'm ditching my cable service completely, except for the cable modem (and if they don't allow that option, then I'm switching to DSL).

    I've looked at the things that my family watches. I've looked at the price of cable. I pay $140 a month for all my cable services. If I get just the cable modem its $45. So I spend $95 extra for what? So the cable company can prevent me from recording HD, and ensure that I can only record Non-HD digital after piping it through a crappy NTSC analog signal.

    We mostly watch Dora the Explorer, Little Einsteins, Battlestar Galactica, and American Idol. I can get 25 episodes of Dora for $20 from iTunes, ditto for Little Einsteins. Battlestar I shall have to get the DVDs, but at least they are in nice high quality.

    So in two months of no-cable I can buy pretty much every Dora, Einsteins, Galactica ever made, and own them permanently.

    Somehow the cable companies have decided that forcing me to rent a cable card (which doesn't work btw), and not even allowing me to put them in my computer, is a good way to do business. They haven't seemed to realise that they are now a commodity service provider: bandwidth. All I need is bandwidth. Other people provide the data. In trying to protect themselves they've built this military grade encryption technology that allows them to keep control of their content. Except that its not their content. It's Nickelodeons and Disneys. And I can get it from other people without all the bullshit, and for a lot less, and I get ownership.

    So don't bother with a DVR unless its to record over-the-air transmissions. Get iTunes instead.

    1. Re:DVR: Pay to wait? by demon · · Score: 1

      Well, CableCard does work - sometimes. I have two of them working happily in my TiVo Series3. However, if you're talking about OCUR-"equipped" Vista PCs, then you got pranked pretty bad, man.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:DVR: Pay to wait? by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

      I got one in the back of my TV. It doesn't work. I would like to put one in my PC, but as you point out, you can't add one to a PC unless that PC was specifically licensed for it. And like my TV, it won't work.

      So its a whole expensive pointless exercise when I can get my contact and avoid the middleman. I would have thought that the middleman would like to stay in business by making it work, but apparently not.

  80. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyway, it's not like Tivos don't have power buttons. Actually, Tivos *don't* have power buttons. Putting them in "standby" does not power down the hard drive (ever). It just enables cable signal passthrough on some devices, and allows suggestions to start recording immediately. (Suggestions are the poor man's free space indicator.)

    I would far prefer if I could have my Tivos shut down their hard drives when not actively recording to save power. (I know all of the arguments about leave it running vs. power on/off for hard drive lifetime.) But since I like really like the Tivo UI overall, I live with these deficiencies.
    (BTW, I pay no continuing fees since my Tivos have lifetime subscriptions, including my S3.)
  81. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by toleraen · · Score: 1

    My bad, thanks for the clarification. I was thinking of the restart function hidden in away in the settings menu. I didn't realize Tivos never power down their drives though...is that common to all set top dvrs? My inlaws have a dvr built into their dish network receiver, and every time it starts to record something you can hear the hard drive click on and start whirring away.

  82. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize Tivos never power down their drives though...is that common to all set top dvrs? I don't know. I also have a non-Tivo hard drive/DVD recorder that is MUCH closer to VCR-like recording (a Toshiba XS32), and it has a menu option whether to power down the drive after a period of time or not. (I only have this because one of the very few other things I don't like about Tivo is that I can't edit recordings before burning to DVD.. and I wanted to do this on a normal consumer electronics device.)

    I also just got a free (for a year) cable DVR, even though I have more than enough recording devices for the vast majority of the time. (Cable companies are presumably getting their hardware out in the field to beat the July 1 cablecard deadline.. so they're willing to give it away for a year rather than throw away hardware.) I wanted some first hand experience to see how bad it was compared to Tivo.
  83. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by rhendershot · · Score: 1

    It's so ridiculously focused on TV that you have to go up 5 levels of menus, then down 5 more, to look through the other videos you have available.

    This is a gross exaggeration.


    The GP has no clue about MythTV whatsoever. I mapped F6 to watch now, F5 to scheduled recordings, Shift-F5 to current recordings and something to the schedule Guide but I never use it, in favor of myth-web.

    I NEVER navigate using the menu no matter what theme I'm using. Key mappings is part of setup menu; whiz bang, ur done.
  84. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any reasonably modern PC can be woken up from hibernate (yes, hibernate -- it powers itself on) on a schedule as well as WOL. Mine does this all the time to record shows I've scheduled at odd hours.

  85. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by pintpusher · · Score: 1

    others have sorta said this but not as bluntly as I will.

    my mythtv box (knoppmyth actually as I'm lazy and have enough debian machines to maintain) turns itself ON and OFF as needed to record whatever shows are scheduled. It generally spends between 0 and 4 hours a day ON (including watching time... turns out most of the shows we record are being recorded at the same time we're watching pre-recorded shows).

    but that's just me.

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
  86. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how exactly does the system know that there's a movie that meets the criteria in my watchlist at 3AM tomorrow morning, or that the starting time of this week's episode of Stargate is an hour earlier than usual?

  87. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by jasonwea · · Score: 1

    MythWeb is also my preferred method of managing my schedules and browsing around the guide.

    I have a button bound for Watch Recordings but I rarely use it. I spend a vast majority of my time in Watch Recordings (Live TV is for suckers :)) and the rest in Watch Videos. Both of these make good use of the cursor keys so I find it easier just to use them.

    In any case, we both seem to be in agreement that MythTV is rather neat :)

  88. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by llefler · · Score: 1

    use a very efficient client based around VIA/mini-itx for the frontend, which is still a bit more than a set top box, but is still an improvement. Not to mention that there are now purpose-built devices for that, such as the AppleTV, Slingbox, etc. You just have to do some research to find one that works with MythTV. My understanding of the Slingbox is that it's a back-end device. It connects to your cable, etc and then streams to other devices, like a cell phone or pc. Am I missing something?

    I ended up getting a Buffalo LinkTheater. To use it with MythTV all you would need to do is run a DLNA daemon to serve the video directory.
    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  89. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by rhendershot · · Score: 1

    In any case, we both seem to be in agreement that MythTV is rather neat :)


    Absolutely! ;)

    Actually my favorite of all features is probably the least applicable to the general user but being able to use SQL against the data... I'm in twirley-hat heaven!
  90. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Apple is pretty lax on software DRM. I have been using OSX since 10.0 and I have never been asked to enter a serial number.

    Try installing OS X in a Virtual Machine.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  91. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably it would be configured to do something similar to what Tivos do... in the middle of the night, wake up, get new schedule information, and re-figure out the scheduled recordings ("To do list" on a Tivo) at that time.

    Tivos don't actually go to sleep, but they DO re-figure out the to do list based upon the user's ordering in the SP manager and new guide data in the middle of the night.

  92. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by afidel · · Score: 1

    Dude, if your PC sucks down 150W doing nothing but HTPC it sucks. I have an Athlon 64x2 4200 with 2GB of ram, two 7200rpm SATA HDD's, and a Geforce 7600GS which is WAY overkill for a HTPC and doing most things it barely uses over 50W, playing games it's barely over 150W!

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  93. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good idea, but what if you buy a ReplayTV unit without a lifetime listings service? And how long are they going to honor that lifetime listings service since they've discontinued the product and been passed from hand to hand? I really would like to know these things because I would be interested in getting one of these.

    Thanks!

  94. Solid State? by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    What's solid state about a hard drive?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_state_(electron ics)

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  95. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    Their web page says they will continue to provide service as long as they are in business. Not very reassuring, I know, but it works now. And since it communicates over the internet, I'm sure one (or a group, i.e. an open source project) can intercept the request and provide the data after scraping, say, TVguide.com...

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  96. Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations. by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Cool, thanks!