Slashdot Mirror


No OLPCs for Cuba, Ever

An anonymous reader writes "In a move going largely unnoticed by developers, the OLPC project now requires all submissions to be hosted in the RedHat Fedora project. While this may not seem like a big deal, the implications are interesting. First, contributors have to sign the Fedora Project Individual Contributor License Agreement. By being forced to submit contributions to the Fedora repository they automatically fall under the provisions of US export law. So, no OLPC for Cuba, Syria and the like. Ever."

88 of 620 comments (clear)

  1. for always and eternity by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because US laws and export restrictions never change. ever.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:for always and eternity by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They probably won't change during the useful life of the OLPC. The US still is under the impression that sanctions and trade embargoes will actually cause regime change in these countries. Even though they haven't worked at all (and in fact have only served to further entrench the regimes in question) over the more than 40 years they've been in place, we're still convinced that if we keep them around just a little bit longer, democracy will flourish.

      Like John Stewart said, we've given up trying to kill Castro with food poison, now we're trying to kill him with "old age poison." If we wait long enough, the regimes will eventually fall, and we can then claim it was all because of the embargo.

    2. Re:for always and eternity by bloobloo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the US that has the draconian embargoes. In the civilized world we can visit Cuba etc.

    3. Re:for always and eternity by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only the US maintains an embargo towards Cuba. It never asked the Security Council to do so.

    4. Re:for always and eternity by eln · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know we like to blame the UN for everything here at Slashdot, but the embargo against Cuba was enacted by President Kennedy in 1961, with the total travel ban enacted in 1963. The UN certainly has its hands in a lot of useless sanctions, but to pretend the UN is responsible for the Cuba situation, or that the US does not exert tremendous influence over the UN, is just flat wrong.

    5. Re:for always and eternity by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Cuba wants the embargo lifted they need to provide cheap labor like China does. After all, China commits terrible atrocities and yet we continue to trade with them for our cheap electronics. Cuba on the other hand, not so bad in recent times, but they only give us cigars so we keep the embargo.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    6. Re:for always and eternity by spisska · · Score: 2, Informative
      The UN still is under the impression that sanctions...

      Fixed your typo. Unless you're under the impression that the US has complete and total control of the security council suddenly.

      Nope. The embargo on Cuba is purely a US matter. There was a time when the US could bully plenty of Central and South American countries into honoring it, but the US is pretty much alone these days. Neither the UN nor the UN Security Council has ever had an embargo on Cuba.

    7. Re:for always and eternity by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Informative

      No - if Cuba wants the embargo lifted - they need to persuade the politically strong Cuban-American groups that work so hard to keep the embargo in place. This issue, like so many others - has deeper roots and issues than your humorous comment allows.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    8. Re:for always and eternity by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The trade embargo with Cuba is US-specific, and the nearly-complete embargoes (such as those with Iran and Syria) are often also US-specific. Europe and Canada trade fairly freely with the island nation, and Russia sells plenty of military gear to both Iran and Syria.

      There are places where economic embargoes, or the threat thereof, may have significant benefit. Libya's acquiesence to UN demands regarding the Lockerbie suspects and checmical and nuclear programs probably came about in part due to economic pressures that prevented foreign companies from investing significantly in its oil fields. And Iran instituted fuel rationing a couple of days ago in response to threat of embargo of gasoline trade into the country in an attempt to build up reserves in anticipation of trade sanctions. Iran has extremely limited refining capabilities, and so imports around a third of its gasoline, and then subsidizes it to 20% of its market price. The response was the destruction of several fuel stations, some small riots, and a very divided and irritated parliament taking up the issue.

      However, in order for trade embargoes to really work, they usually have to be nearly universal, though even then there is no guarantee. North Korea is a prime example here, where the leaders keep such a tight lid on the people that they don't fear uprisings, while they live in comfort that their people can barely even dream about. However, recent targeting of leadership assets overseas has brought pressure there that tangible results (a scheduled shutdown of DPRK's reactor in July) may be coming about.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    9. Re:for always and eternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just wanted to have a go at the UN There, fixed your typo for you.
    10. Re:for always and eternity by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because US laws and export restrictions never change. ever.

      They won't change unless there is someone in the Whitehouse who isn't too busy doing the "LA LA LA, I can't hear the Commies off the Florida coast..." to change the stupid law.

      We trade with China, what's the big deal? Other than dirt cheap [often low quality] products, I fail to see the difference.

    11. Re:for always and eternity by i · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. Not necessarely at least.
      When Castro dies, his brother Ramon will take over. And he is a stalinist-type communist.

      Fidel himself was not a (pure) communist from the beginning, but as Cuba was isolated by USA after the revolution he had to go to Soviet for help (economical and other).
      And by that the regime went to communism.

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    12. Re:for always and eternity by MontyApollo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe there are items exempted from this embargo, and particular items can be exempted on a case by case basis. Congress would not have to revoke the law, just add another exception to it.

    13. Re:for always and eternity by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Canadian, I like the trade embargo.

      It means there's a nice warm international vacation destination with no Americans.

      Now, that's something that money just can't buy.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    14. Re:for always and eternity by rifter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because US laws and export restrictions never change. ever.

      When it comes to Cuba, that's pretty much a given. Cuba has vowed to keep their current system in perpetuity and the US has vowed never to lift the embargoes as long as that is the case. That impasse is enforced by the Cuban expatriates and disgruntled corporations on the US side and the Castros and people with deep distrust of the US on the Cuban side. Not only is neither side budging, they aren't even discussing, or daring to suggest that they might consider, the possibility of change.

    15. Re:for always and eternity by WED+Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

      When Castro dies, his brother Ramon will take over.

      I thought his brother was Raul?

      By the way, did you ever wonder what happened to the other Castro Brothers?

      • Chico - Working at a small garage in Havana keeping all the '58 Chevy's runny. And, installing the little nodding dogs in the back window
      • Ramone - Last seen doing a drag impersonation of his older brother Fidel in a Miami club
      • Harpo - Makes the best Mohitos in Ft. Lauderdale, doesn't talk much
      • Julio (now Conchita) - Works a corner in New York City
      • Juan - Was standing against a wall, when an entire line of soldiers, cleaning their weapons, accidentally shot him. This had nothing to do with an argument he had with his younger brother Fidel, the night before, about who played the best Darren on "Bewitched"
      • Raymondo - Fled Cuba after painting the slogan "Dick York Lives" on the side of Fidel's prized Bel Air sedan
      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    16. Re:for always and eternity by TheMeuge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US still is under the impression that sanctions and trade embargoes will actually cause regime change in these countries.

      And this impression is absolutely right. As the sanctions damage the economies of the countries in question and perpetuate the strife, the regimes do and will continue to change: from anti-US, aggressive, and violent... to MORE anti-US, MORE aggressive and MORE violent.
    17. Re:for always and eternity by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To think the US has control of the security council is naive. No country has any power in the security council for the most part. Security Council requires unanimous decisions, and the US is always at odds with someone else in the Sec Council. During the Cold War, it was the USSR, and now it's China (and Russia still somewhat).

      Fun times had by all...

    18. Re:for always and eternity by nomadic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It means there's a nice warm international vacation destination with no Americans.

      We're not so bad...

    19. Re:for always and eternity by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Russia doesn't need a stable Middle East so they can afford to trade with countries that actually compete with it in energy production without fear of unbalancing the region, hell its in their best interest to have an unbalanced region.

      Cuba never had anything valuable other than location for Russia, ICBMs made it irrelevant long ago

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    20. Re:for always and eternity by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, we here in the US can visit Cuba as well, we just have to fly to Mexico first.

      The US embargo of Cuba is not something people in the US take seriously. One of the "perks" of going to Mexico is bringing back a bottle of Cuban rum or a box of cigars. Most of us are mystified why the embargo wasn't lifed in 1991; engagement works better against communism than isolation (see: China.)

    21. Re:for always and eternity by orasio · · Score: 2

      Anyhow, the embargo works.
      Right now, there are some good and bad things in Cuba.
      You get decent health care and a good education, but no car, bad food, bad paid jobs and stuff (a lot of bad stuff, in fact).
      Let's not talk about lack of freedom of speech, executions without trial, or with fake trials, because that is not inherent to Cuba and its regime.
      If Cuba was allowed to trade freely, there would be a possibility that life in Cuba would be better (or not, of course), and that could be perceived as their system not being thaaat bad (of course, it wouldn't prove anything, but perception is key), and fighting communism outside of the US wouldn't seem that obviously necessary.

    22. Re:for always and eternity by dilinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Much better than, "Hey, let's refuse to do business with Cubans!"

      Lighten up, dumbass.

    23. Re:for always and eternity by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good luck with that.

      If you've travelled abroad lately from the US, you know that the folks at Homeland Security take their jobs very seriously. Also, the State Department has been nailing US citizens who have visited Cuba without authorization with very stiff fines. When they do find out you've visited there from a 3rd country (and they will), expect a registered letter or summons to appear in federal court. It's happened to people I know. Fines and court fees can run in the thousands of dollars.

      Cuban products are also considered contraband in the US and therefore are just as illegal as if you were smuggling pot or cocaine. If you are found with cuban made cigars, rum, etc. on your person that you have not declared, you can be detained, prosecuted, fined, and possibly jailed if you get a nasty prosecutor. Not at all worth it for an authentic mojito and a few cojibas IMHO.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    24. Re:for always and eternity by mi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, they just need to return the confiscated real estate to their rightful owners and/or their kin.

      As for China being a worse offender — yes, indeed. Although I doubt, China's "terrible attrocities" match Castro/Guevarra's per-capita, it was a black day, when Clinton gave China a preferred trade status — temporary at first, then permanent in 2000...

      US media was applauding him, and the illiberal heavy-weights like New York Times even criticized the few lawmakers, who tried to prevent the bill on those pesky "human rights issues".

      Anyway, whatever the situation with China is/was, Cuba is a horrible regime, and should be kept under the pile of bricks until it either changes or collapses.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    25. Re:for always and eternity by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, no, it shouldn't.

      My wife and I have gone on several trips to Canada (specifically BC and Yukon). We were very happy there were no other Americans around, because even in the metropolis of Vancouver, most people are very friendly unlike in American cities. Actually, we did run across one total jerk; he was American.

      So yes, I'm happy to go on vacation where there are no Americans around, and I am an American!

      The plain and simple truth is that Americans tend far more often to be assholes than people in many other countries. This doesn't mean we're the only assholes; Muslim middle easterners and Pakistanis tend to be total assholes too (especially if you're female and they're male), but here in the Americas we're most noticeable because there's so many of us.

    26. Re:for always and eternity by dharbee · · Score: 4, Funny

      "In the civilized world we can visit Cuba etc."

      So, what about Europeans? Can they visit Cuba too?

    27. Re:for always and eternity by bonknasty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buffalo IS one hour or so away from NYC if you're going at 350 mph. What does your aunt drive?

      --
      www.arkhambrewingcompany.com For all your Lovecraftian T-Shirt needs
    28. Re:for always and eternity by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China has nukes pointed at us. China also kills and imprisons people for trying to exercise free speech. Yet China is our most favored nation trading partner.

      Not too smart, are you?

    29. Re:for always and eternity by dosquatch · · Score: 3, Informative

      We treat Cuba like we do because Kennedy's ordered assassination of Castro failed.

      Fixed it for ya.

      Oh, damn, I didn't see the "don't feed the trolls" sign. Sorry.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    30. Re:for always and eternity by amper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, my experience has been entirely the opposite. In my travels through Europe, I found that Europeans, by and large, are quite rude when interacting in an impersonal manner. It's only when you get involved in one-on-one interactions that they become more friendly. Americans on the whole I find to be much more polite to strangers. I suppose it depends on the class of people you interact with more than anything else.

      And for what it's worth, down at the Jersey Shore, they have quite a few choice things to say about the Canadian tourists...

    31. Re:for always and eternity by Kirgin · · Score: 5, Informative

      lol, you do realize Castro's family was rich and was part of the ruling class in Cuba BEFORE the revolution. Same with Che Guevara's. Guess what plantation was the first one given over to the "people" Castro's mother's. Castro gave everything his family owned to the people.

      Castro lives in a shack compared to the average upper middle class in the US.

      When I say that children will get the best first in Cuba its just a continuation of their philosophy. Schools have better computers than banks in Cuba. If you aren't working you are in school in Cuba. They know its the best defense against being exploited again. You can't exploit a society thats smarter than yours.

      What you need to do is assume everything you hear on Fox news is the opposite of how it is in Cuba.

    32. Re:for always and eternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      What gave you that idea? US citizens are banned from traveling to Cuba except for educational or humanitarian purposes. The fines tend to be in the $30,000-$40,000 range. They didn't enforce it very often until the current administration took office, but now it is very common.

    33. Re:for always and eternity by wayward_bruce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [...] The US still is under the impression that sanctions and trade embargoes will actually cause regime change in these countries. Even though they haven't worked at all (and in fact have only served to further entrench the regimes in question) over the more than 40 years they've been in place, we're still convinced that if we keep them around just a little bit longer, democracy will flourish.

      I second that. Having lived in Serbia until two years ago, I have witnessed first-hand the effects of trade embargoes on the attempts of the international community to displace Slobodan Milosevic. Those effects were largely the exact opposite; they:
      • added fuel to the isolationist rhetoric;
      • further damaged the already dwindling industry and economy;
      • further reduced the standard of common people, which in turn led the organized crime to blossom;
      • made everybody think about getting "food on their families" instead of reinstating democracy.

      What did help was sending smaller amounts of money to the opposition and student organizations, and of course the whole cultural influence from abroad. By the same token, even if many of the values that usually come for free with the modern understanding of "democracy" and "capitalism" are nothing but mere eye-candy and low-fi money-traps, they might yet prove to be the best way to impose one country's standards and views upon another. OLPC is no exception to this: give it to the kids and see what happens when they grow up.
    34. Re:for always and eternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And of course you don't also mind your non-American vacation coming at the costs of Cubans under their oppressive government. I'm sure you wouldn't have any problem switching places with the Cubans :) You could still have your problem with Americans!

      First off, ram that smug, goddamned smiley back up your rectum where you found it.

      Don't give me any of your jingoistic, fascist "love it or leave it" horseshit. Not while we suck the asses of the fucking bastard Saudis (who provided the 9/11 folks), North Korea and the rest of the motherfucking countries willing to accept our "unlawful combatants" for torture, since we want to play Pontius Pilate with them. Sure, let's hear it, America -- "I am innocent of the blood of this beaten, shocked, genitally-mutilated man whom the Turks display to us."

      Didn't your mother ever tell you, "Pick on someone your own size"? We fuck over Cuba for the same reason a dog licks it's own asshole -- because he (we) can.

      We are a nation of buttfucking, cowardly bullies.

    35. Re:for always and eternity by 808140 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has more to do with politeness norms than anything else. What it means to be polite is not culturally invariant -- to take an extreme example which you may have been exposed to anecdotally, the sorts of things that are important and considered polite to a Japanese person are not the same as to an American person. You're rude there if you don't pour drinks for your guests with both hands and if you don't slurp your noodles you're insulting the cook.

      Well, French culture (for example) may share a lot more in common with American culture than Japanese culture does, but it is nonetheless different and has different ideas of what it means to be polite. Consider: most Americans think that French people are quite rude, and it's not uncommon for people who go to France on vacation (one of the most popular vacation destinations in the world) to come back with stories about how rude they are. What may surprise you is that in France, Americans are widely seen as extremely rude. Despite what you may think, this is not due to France's perceived anti-Americanism. It's due to different politeness norms. Since I'm intimately familiar with both cultures, I'll give you a run-down of why this notion persists on both sides. Similar explanations work for any other culture, I'm sure, although the details are bound to be different.

      French, like many European languages (and English, in the old days, but not any more) has what is called a T-V distinction. This means that they have two different words for "you": one is formal, and one is informal. With friends and children you might use the informal one; with strangers on the street, colleagues at work, clients, etc, you'd probably use the formal one. It's actually much more subtle and complex than this, but bear with me. Then, the French rarely address people they don't know well by their first names, preferring instead words like Mister, Madam, and Sir. They place extremely heavy emphasis on greeting people, even strangers: when you walk into the Baker's shop, as soon as you open the door, you are expected to greet everyone (not individually, but you might say something like "Messieurs Dames" Saying "Please" and "Thank You" is extremely important. With people you don't know well, you are expected to be formal, even a little bit stiff. This is because being overly familiar with someone you don't know well is considered very rude, and the French person feels rather the same way that an American might feel when his personal space is invaded if someone is too informal with him.

      Americans, on the other hand, speak a language which lacks a T-V distinction. While saying please and thank you is considered well-mannered, in general, the American thinks he is being polite by being friendly. In American society, smiling a lot when you greet someone and acting like you're old friends is considered polite, and calling someone Mister is seen as extremely stuffy -- outside of very formal situations, like job interviews, the average American feels uncomfortable using these terms. You don't want to be seen as stuck-up, and many Americans will feel that you are putting on airs if you don't smile much and persist in calling them sir.

      I remember once that my cousin came to visit me and she had a conversation with a lady while waiting in line at the supermarket. The lady was very friendly, asked her how she liked the US, and generally did the American thing. The lady said things like, "Oh, you should come over to my place sometime, my husband really knows how to BBQ". My cousin came away feeling like this woman, who was just trying to be friendly, was extremely fake. All the small talk, the asking of questions whose answers she wasn't really interested in -- they all severely offended her French sensibilities. But this is in no way a criticism of the American woman; in the context of American culture, she was being polite and welcoming to a foreigner. Still, a misunderstanding resulted.

      So, essentially, what is considered polite is different in differ

    36. Re:for always and eternity by Kirgin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So by your logic George Bush is the richest man in the world...or I should say Dick Cheney is.

      Castro built the system, he dosen't walk around and point to 18 year old girls and say "come with me" and they have to. No, it dosen't work that way. Castro believes in Communism because his early adult life showed him that capitalism (owning of property, having people indebted..etc) lead to nothing but misery for Cuba. Cubans were second class citizens in their own country under American rule (everything owned by US companies). Hell, Cuban military had orders to shoot at any United Fruit ships dared to even come close to Cuba. If you don't know who United Fruit was then google it.

      The system dictates how Cubans behave, not Castro. when Castro dies, nothing will change unless the system(the people) decide. But a lot of Cubans like feeling safe, like have 100% employment, like having free education/healthcare. The big complaint I ever hear from Cubans is about censoring/controlling of media/information and travel.

      Without the US embargo Cuba would probably move towards socialism. The people that are against the lifting of the embargo are the exiled(rich or formely) Cuban families and US trade companies that want to sweep in when Castro dies and "Claim" their family plantations and rule the lowerclasses like their parents/grandparents did. US will back their claims, they'll say Cuba "owes" 50 years of lost revenue and then legally fengshwei a debt to the world bank for said lost revenue...then begin to claim other aspects of Cuba as "debt reclamation". Or some other dumbfuck capitalist scheme like that.

      That is why Castro is so strict when it comes to ANYTHING that in his mind may lead to a returning to the way they were; 90% illiteracy and a population enslaved(indebted) to foreign interests. Is it justified?

      So ya, to sum: up Castro isn't an asshole dictator like any number of banana republics. He contributes more doctors/medicine to impoverished spanish colonies than anyone in the world. And he also happend to be a good friend of my hero Pierre Trudeau.

      Oh, and the banks are really for us tourists/foreign nations. Communists don't need banks.

    37. Re:for always and eternity by omfgnosis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      @Nullav,

      US citizens are responsible for the actions of their government. One could argue that the so-called democratic nature of the US government only increases that responsibility. This is the same for citizens of any country, though. And the US actually set this precedent after WWII. Just as the German citizens were responsible to stop the crimes of the nazi regime, we're responsible to stop the crimes of our own country.

    38. Re:for always and eternity by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We're not so bad...

      ...as long as you are a European hotelier which are the people who completed the survey the article reports on. Since US tipping practice calls for huge tips on the European scale (which I am sure the hoteliers love) and only US tourists with sufficient education to want to visit Europe as well as the money to afford to do so will go so this is not unbiased data.

      That being said the reason I think US tourists get such a bad rap with other tourists is because they like to travel around in large groups by tour bus. When I am a tourist I find having a large groups of people clogging things up is irritating regardless of their nationality! Of course for hoteliers it is not a problem.

    39. Re:for always and eternity by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moderators, if the parent had said, "It means there's a nice warm international vacation destination with no African-Americans." - would you still mod the parent up?

    40. Re:for always and eternity by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not only that, but they need to abandon hippie shit like free health care too. We can't have them hanging around right off our coast showing Americans that universal health care can be done (it's hard enough clouding Americans' vision of Canada's healthcare system by making up a bunch of negative lies about it).

      How are our insurance companies supposed to turn a profit with shit like that going on?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    41. Re:for always and eternity by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because the Cubans in Florida are such a reasonable and level-headed people to deal with. I think we all saw that during the Elian Gonzalez debacle.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    42. Re:for always and eternity by klossner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet China is our most favored nation trading partner. No, they are nothing of the sort. Most favored nation trading status is a misnomer; it actually means normal trading status. The U.S. stopped using the term altogether in 1998; we now call it normal trade relations.
    43. Re:for always and eternity by dryeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, at no [unclassified] point in the 1960's did we have nuke-tipped weapons less than 100 miles from their border.

      The crisis all started when missiles were deployed in Turkey. Perhaps a hair over 100 miles but still only 16 minutes from Moscow. At the time the US had 8 times the nukes as the USSR and much better delivery. The USSR had crappy cruise missiles to be launched from submarines on the surface (range about much less the the US polaris missiles 1000 mile range) and like 4 big ICBMs and a few more smaller ones. So perhaps the US didn't have missiles within a 100 miles but time wise they were pretty close and out gunned the USSR by quite a bit.
      Basically the USSR was aiming at parity whereas the USA was aiming at total domination. And considering what Russia has gone through over the years it is a lot more understandable why they are so paranoid.
      Moscow had been burned down within memory (less then 20 years) where as the last time Washington was burned down was approaching 150 years (1813?)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    44. Re:for always and eternity by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if your comment is a troll or not, but I'll bite anyway. Travel to Cuba is strictly limited under US law. The laws were created under authority granted to the President's office via the 'Trading with the Enemy' act. You must obtain a license in order to travel Cuba legally. Licenses are only granted for scientific, educational, humanitarian and family visit puroses. More detail on the current law and it's history is here http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/87354. pdf (pdf warning). I'm not evoking boogeymen, but simply pointing out that a lot of posts here indicate a cavalier attitude towards travel to Cuba which is unwise if you live in the US.

      A friend of mine (yeah, like I'm gonna post his peronal data on /.) travelled to Cuba via the Dominican Republic nearly 2 years ago. The State Department found out about it and he was fined over $1,700. That's a pretty hefty vacation tax. Bring back a couple of Cuban cigars and most likely, no one's going to notice it. Try bringing back a case and, at best it can be confiscated. At worst, you're looking at potential fines and prosecution. Like I said, the Customs and Homeland Security folks take their jobs pretty seriously.

      I stand by my remarks.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  2. not forever by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just the foreseeable future. Regimes change (thank god) and governments change. Little over 30 years ago we where Irans friend and traded major arms to her (including F-14 fighters and their powerful at the time Phoenix missiles) in less than 3 years they became our sworn enemy.

    things change fast in the world

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:not forever by Dancindan84 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but Castro is some kind of immortal zombie communist.

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  3. A bit misleading by The+Breeze · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't say "ever"...both Cuba and Syria have made steps towards getting removed from the US ban list, and with Fidel teetering on death's edge, who knows what the future will bring.

    1. Re:A bit misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The big problem seems to be that one of the major US swing states is full of asshats who won't die. Evicted from Cuba for being corrupt they are annoyed that the US hasn't managed (through incompetence, rather than lack of malice) to get their country back for them.

      The sooner they pop their clogs the better. Cuba (especially the people of Cuba) don't deserve the treatment they get from the US and the rest of the world is rather mystified why it has taken the US so long to stop being an ass about the issue.

    2. Re:A bit misleading by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, the rest of the world has just had to put up with the US and Russia pointing enough missiles at each other for the residual damage to wipe out humanity multiple times over, for decades. We couldn't possibly understand how scary it was for you to have a few missiles in place in Cuba for a few months.

    3. Re:A bit misleading by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess the rest of the world hasn't had Cuban missile bases a few km off their coast and those missiles pointed at them. It tends to lead to grudges being held, you see.


      Most of the world has real borders with their enemies, with tanks and missiles and bombers able to cross at any time, and has learned to deal with it. We live in a little bubble protected by two vast oceans and think that anyone saying "boo" from a thousand miles away is a mortal threat.

      Our embargo against Cuba is just a pointless grudge that serves one domestic political group and does a disservice to the people of both nations overall.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:A bit misleading by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it makes perfect sense to inconvenience your enemy if you can, and don't even suffer any damage in doing so....If you have the option to create further damage to your enemy, you just go ahead and do it. The fact that I am not in a position to do so does not mean that you should avoid it too in the name of... empathy? Or what?


      Except that Cuba is not an "enemy" except to Cuban refugees in Florida. They're just a small state that has a government we dislike, but presents no real threat to us now that the Soviet Union is gone. And we certainly do suffer economically from the embargo -- if we didn't, there'd be no need to make a law against trading with them.

      It isn't about empathy, it's about having Cubans see us as a prosperous ally they want to get closer to rather than as an adversary they need to set up barriers against. If we had easy tourism and trading with Cuba, it would take about 10 years for it to be one of the most pro-American places on Earth no matter what the government says about us. Money and prosperity have a strange way of bringing people closer.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:A bit misleading by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you think the US has anything Cuba wants anymore? In 1960 we had factories that made things that were needed in Cuba. In 1980 Cuba had 30-year-old cars they couldn't get parts for because they were made in the US.

      Today everything is made in China and nothing is made in the US. Canada and Mexico make a lot of cars for the US, so I wouldn't think getting parts would be a problem for Cuba.

      Really, what does the US have that Cuba could possibly want? Wal-Mart? Banks? High risk home mortgage companies?

  4. This is News How? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While this may not seem like a big deal, the implications are interesting. It's not a big deal. Everything made in America falls under these laws. Whether it be the corn we grow or the software written (in any part) or served within the United States. Even Windows (bullet 7) falls under these restrictions.

    Yet, not too surprisingly, Windows has found its way into Cuba and I'm certain the OLPC will also be found there in mass quantities if it is indeed useful/popular. Physical devices may be harder to find there than software but you'll find them there.

    This isn't news. The U.S. trade embargos have been in place on Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Sudan and Syria for a while now. Furthermore, if the laptops are made and assembled outside the U.S.

    So let's get creative here, you make and manufacture the hardware outside the United States. Then you ship them to restricted countries (I think the parts are going to come from China anyway). You leave it up to people inside Cuba or where ever to install the OLPC image. Who has violated the TOS? The citizens of the country who really don't give a damn what U.S. export laws they're breaking.

    And if these laws are broken, who's going to enforce them? Redhat/Fedora? The U.S. government is going to show up and stop laptops from going to children? The U.S. government is going to shutdown a free open source software hosting site? I highly doubt it.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:This is News How? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no reason someone can't also distribute the software in another country (like Cuba, Syria, Canuckistan (Canada), Germany, France, wherever ...) The "license" you agree to is not an exclusive license.

      Contributor Grant of License. You hereby grant to Red Hat, Inc., on behalf of the Project, and to recipients of software distributed by the Project:

      * (a) a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, fully paid-up, royalty free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute your Contribution and such derivative works; and,

      * (b) a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, fully paid-up, royalty free, irrevocable (subject to Section 3) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer your Contribution and derivative works thereof, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by you that are necessarily infringed by your Contribution alone or by combination of your Contribution with the work to which you submitted the Contribution. Except for the license granted in this section, you reserve all right, title and interest in and to your Contributions.

      The internet has been known to route around damage, you know ...

    2. Re:This is News How? by rborek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yet, not too surprisingly, Windows has found its way into Cuba
      Most likely from Canada, which prohibits complying with the US Cuba export restrictions laws. Complying with US law with regards to Cuba can land you in jail for up to 5 years.
  5. Ever? by Speare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, no OLPC for Cuba, Syria and the like. Ever.

    Yeah, like US Law has never ever changed. Remember trade embargoes during apartheid? Castro's ill, it's not clear who will be taking over. New high-level talks have opened with Syria recently also. Not saying that either of these things are likely to change next month, but "never" is pretty long.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  6. Who cares about Redhat? by blueroses · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just put Centos on them...

  7. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    lol what the fuck do you know about Cuba that you didn't see on FOX?

    Sit down, Rambo.

  8. This is another triumph of politics... by Brainix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...over goodwill.

    --
    Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
    1. Re:This is another triumph of politics... by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the reward for goodwill towards murderous enemies again?


      That the people under their control see we're more successful and prosperous than they are, and begin to wonder why that is and envy our way of life despite whatever propaganda their leadership broadcasts. It worked in the Soviet Union, all of Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia.

      Bombing the world with Hollywood, Levi's, Coca-Cola and Britney Spears has been far more effective at changing enemies into allies than any military operation we've engaged in since WWII. The only real question is why so many Americans and politicians profess the superiority of Democracy and Capitalism, yet don't actually trust them to outperform Totalitarian Communism over the long term.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  9. That's a little bit pessamistic by also-rr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One day the US will normalise relations with Cuba. The process might not happen until after the current generation of ex-Cubans in Forida is dead, but that's hardly _never_.

    In the mean time they could just funnel shipments through a neutral third party. Creative accountants can manage to hide billions from the IRS, why shouldn't they be able to do something socially useful like vanish a couple of shipping containers of laptops.

  10. That'd teach those kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That'd teach those kids for living in the wrong countries.

  11. When Castro dies..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    - Castro dies
    - Mutual Defense Pact is unveiled between Venezuela and Cuba, and Castro's successor asks Venezuela for "help."
    - Venezuela military moves in under the guise of "protecting" Cuba from invasion from other countries.
    - Cuba becomes a satellite province of Venezuela.

    Unless the US and other countries have the balls to throw up a naval force and cordon off Cuba so the people of Cuba can handle it for themselves.

  12. Re:Good. by mujo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They don't really give a shit about their people anyway."

    unlike the us government who gives much shit about their people, plunging 400 billions of dollars in a war for the oil industry, refuse to give health insurance to sick americans to cater for private insurance business, wiretap their citizens, ...

    land of the free!

  13. Re:Good-idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wow you guys really drank the neocon coolaid. Learn to look through the propoganda, and you might see there is a world OUTSIDE THE US. Fuck off you stupid drones.

    Sanctions only exist to subjugate the peoples of these countries,increasing the death rates of the young, and lower the quality of life of the citizens. Sanctions, and withholding of technologies of these "rogue states" (read: any states that have the balls to stand up to US economic and social hegemony), only serves to bolster these regimes(many of which were installed and supported by the CIA/NSA/etc to fight other "threats").

    Face it, US foreign policy is one of economic fascism, cultural indoctrination and genocide.

    I'm a proud American who is embarassed by the evil imperialists who run our country.

  14. Re:Good. by butlerdi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why ? Have you been there ? They have a much better society than they would have had the American Mafia continued running it. They have good education, reasonable health care and while not so much stuff, they do not have foreclosures and bankruptcies the likes that you have been experiencing. Not to mention the next round coming on about now. Even after all these years of embargo by their ever so caring neighbors to the North, they still smile much more than anywhere I have ever seen in the US. I think sir it is you who ought to read a book.

    --
    "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
  15. Re:Good. by Elemenope · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think GP was reacting to the rather more ridiculous contention that American politicians by and large give more of a crap about the people they govern than politicans in other countries. That the countervailing evidence manifests as health insurance being inaccessible for a huge swath of the working population (when a good portion of the rest of the world has amply demonstrated is not a necessary situation), and the prosecution of an transpatently profiteering war that has killed tens (hundreds?) of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of Americans (which most of the rest of the world considered if not illegal than just plain stupid to get involved in), is simply a reflection of our own neuroses. Other countries screw over their people in different ways, according to different guiding ideologies.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  16. Re:The list can change by fredrated · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US sponsers a hell of a lot more terrorism than Cuba. For example, what exactly did you think 'shock and awe' was supposed to be? George Bush has now killed far more innocent people that Castro could if he lived to be 200.

  17. Re:The list can change by clashdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One statement is true. Which one?
    1) Cuba sponsors terrorism directed at the US.
    2) The US sponsors terrorism directed at Cuba.

  18. Re:Good. by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not only that, but if you were caught giving one to a little girl, they'd probably kill you, then behead the girl because it promotes learning.

    Literacy:
    definition: age 15 and over can read and write
    total population: 97%
    male: 97.2%
    female: 96.9% (2003 est.) World Factbook - Cuba

  19. Re:Good. by butlerdi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, initially it was the upper and middle classes that stood to loose their wealth due to redistribution and probably some due to their assistance to the people who were at the receiving end of the revolution. Now, after 30+ years of sanctions there are people who wish for more money and the things that accompany it, the same as immigrants from other countries.

    I have spent some time in Cuba and have had many interesting conversations regarding the revolution. The funny thing is that many seem to think the embargo is funny. A cigar that sells for 5 Euros in Europe sells for 5 times than on the US market. It is always fun to watch US tourist queue up to purchase them wherever they are available.

    Not everyone in the world is dying to leave their country and move to the US, no matter what the boys at Fox say. Rupert is not even there most of the time.

    --
    "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
  20. Trivial to work around by njchick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One person signs the agreement and submits the project to Fedora. Anther person submits the project from Fedora to OLPC. There is no requirement that it's the same person.

  21. With Cuba, it's personal (plus sugar lobby...) by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Cuba embargo is mostly around because fanatics in Florida take it very personally, and there are enough votes in Florida that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are willing to mess with it. Eventually Castro's going to die, and that might change things.


    But Cuba's main agricultural product, besides tobacco, is sugar, and the US has had high tariffs on sugar for a long time. Not only does that prop up US sugar producers (mainly Louisiana, Hawaii, Florida_) by keeping the US sugar price far higher than the world average, but the High-Fructose Corn Syrup lobby likes high sugar prices because they can put their dreck into our soda, while the rest of the world gets to have Coke with real sugar in it. So the Archer Daniels Midland gang also don't want free trade with Cuba.


    I'd recommend that next time you're in Canada, you get some Cuban cigars, except for the problem that they put carcinogenic flammable tobacco products in the things....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:With Cuba, it's personal (plus sugar lobby...) by daem0n1x · · Score: 2, Informative

      You bet! Cuban rum is great, that Bacardi shit they sell us everywhere sucks.

    2. Re:With Cuba, it's personal (plus sugar lobby...) by Emetophobe · · Score: 2, Informative

      See this blog: http://shawn-news.blogspot.com/2007/06/my-sugary-c anadian-coca-cola.html

      Or a direct link to the image of the Coke can with ingredients: http://bp3.blogger.com/_yepdryo6x-A/RmbpSd3a7OI/AA AAAAAAAy0/pdbVoFMNxj0/s1600-h/CokeIngredients.jpg

      Looks like Canadian Coke uses sugar.

    3. Re:With Cuba, it's personal (plus sugar lobby...) by randomjohndoe · · Score: 5, Informative
      This is true

      The Cuba embargo is mostly around because fanatics in Florida take it very personally, and there are enough votes in Florida that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are willing to mess with it.
      Florida has 25 elecotoral votes, 4th behind California (54), New York (33) and Texas (32).

      The US Electoral College is a winner takes all system, so the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote in any state, no matter how small the margin, gets all the electoral votes for that state. In 2000 Bush beat Gore in FL by a tiny fraction of a percent, winning all 25 of FL's electoral votes, and thus the election. Anti-Castro Cubans are not a big group, but they are concentrated in FL and they are single issue voters (whereas anti-embargo voters are neither), so they can swing a close presidential election. So their influence on Cuba policy is disproportionate.

      Something that is overlooked is that even if Castro lives to be 120, the US policy will change eventually because the Anti-Castro Cubans are getting older too, and their children are more moderate. And a lot of them would like to visit their homeland some day.
  22. After years of sanctions ... by Bob-taro · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... this will be the one that finally triggers democratic reforms in Cuba!

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  23. Not like Cuba, or Syria allow private internet con by olivercromwell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was under the impression that part of the OLPC project was not only to get computers into the hands of people in under developed countries, but also to get them connected. Well, in Cuba it is an offense to have a PC at home without permission and license from the State, and private internet connections are forbidden. Possessing a PC, and having connected to the net can get you 20 years in the pogey. So, the OLPC would likely have been a no go in Cuba anyway. Furthermore, I think the money wasted on OLPC would have been far better spent setting up programs for low intensity, organic agriculture desigend to replace cash crop cultivation with food supply crops. But, I guess feeding people isn't as cool, or sexy as sending them a bright gree, hand cranked laptop. To me, Negroponte is an ass.

  24. Re:Good-idiots by the_tsi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a lot easier to dismiss opinions you don't like by alleging they are being propagated by people who don't analyze them, isn't it?

  25. Re:Good. by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

    land of the free!


    Or as Osama Bin Laden says: "I am still free, how about you?"
    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Re:Good. by Elemenope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm of the philosophy that proportionality is irrelevant when it comes to existential conditions like suffering. That is to say, roughly, a million people dying early through lack of health insurance is a 'huge swath' whether it is a million amongs three million, or a million amongst three hundred million. And seeing as how it is forty million amongst who-cares-how-large a population, that qualifies in my mind as, to put it mildly, a 'huge swath'.

    And, as another poster put it sharply, nobody 'chooses' to not have health insurance. Self-employed people have a hard time getting insurance at the same rates as large employers, because large employers benefit from huge quantities of corporate welfare and preferential deals regardings scale when they deal with HMOs that somehow never trickle down to self-emloyed folk. And, just for the record, nobody willingly chooses to die early, which in the vast majority of cases is what not having health insurance practically means. BTW, most of the uninsured aren't self-employed people; most of the uninsured are children of self-employed people. And they, roughly, didn't have any choice whatsoever in their circumstances.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  27. OLPC in Cuba? by alexgieg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What's an OLPC without Internet connection? Because, if you don't know, the Cuban government mandates that any Internet access by Cubans be made through the official state ISP, which can be dialed up only from phone lines that pay in dollars, which Cubans are usually prohibited from possessing. Worse: if you want a computer, you first need approval from the government, which can simply say "no". Given that, do you think the Communist Party of Cuba would change the rules and allow freedom for children? Some information I googled 3 mins ago:

    So, don't fool yourself. Right now, lack of OLPC notebooks is the least of the problems faced by Cuban children. Or, for that matter, by their parents.
    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  28. Broader issue that Helms-Burton by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The point of why this is a bad move for OLPC isn't just about what's bad with the Cuba export ban specifically. That ban *is* indeed stupid, but this also subverts the international intention of the OLPC project to the narrow whims the US administration.

    Perhaps some other country or countries will be declared official enemies next year. Especially if, say, MS and Intel can persuade a US administration that a mandate for Free Software in, say, Peru or Bolivia, is "contrary to US interests". Or even if such a ban is declared for completely unrelated reasons, the OLPC should not allow itself to be derailed by partisan or sensationalist whims of a USA administration.

  29. Re:So? by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You say this like it is a bad thing. The less IT infrastructure these repressive regimes have the better. I personally think the embargo against Cuba at this point is counter-productive, but I am not going to cry because they can't use this software either.

    Excellent point. Without technological infrastructure, things like the DMCA takedown notices, RIAA John Doe suits, Echelon, Carnivore, and CCTV cameras on street corners would all be impossible. Or do you have some other, more narrow, definition of "repressive" in mind?

  30. the embargo is a two-edged sword by gobbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    You bet! Cuban rum is great, that Bacardi shit they sell us everywhere sucks.

    Here's a perk of living in (even rural) Canada: I go down to the garage/general/liquor store, and there on the shelf is Havana Club, "Ron puro Cubano," mmm, great is right. And cuban coffee in the cupboard, it's only pretty good but it's organic.

    There may be long-term competitive benefits accruing to Cuba out of the blockade and its hardships.

    The whole island has pretty much gone organic, as part of the austerity produced by the embargo, and they're trying to turn that constraint into a strength. When the embargo finally drops in the US, watch for cuban specialty products showing up in the organic food stores.

    They need an internationally credible domestic certification system to really flourish, however the embargo has forced them to look hard at their local food security, so they'd be okay if international trade was interrupted. They have international trade in things like organic fruits and coffee, and they've made interesting innovations with domestic distribution in mind, like the Organopónicos.

    The embargo has created constraints that make it an interesting testbed for development without the overwhelming influence of large transnationals. It's a race between the international organic sector to help establish Cuba as an entrenched organic ag system and the influx of Life Sciences transnationals that might happen if there's regime change.

    Cuba's ripe turf for donated linux-ready systems, so support that goal in some way. There's enough real zeal for independence and common interests to make it a interesting test bed for a society running on open-source software.

    1. Re:the embargo is a two-edged sword by daem0n1x · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are already a world power in advanced medicine. I personally know some people that went to Cuba for treatments that don't exist anywhere else. I read they are becoming great at biotech and registering patents like crazy.

      Sure, it's a dictatorship but the social indicators for Cuba are among the best in the World. Even in the human rights issue, Cuba ranks better than many american countries, including... cough, cough, the USA. If it wasn't for this dumb embargo, Cuba would have gone democratic many years ago.

      EU countries have businesses with Cuba but the private companies are weary of doing any business because they don't want to piss off the Americans. And our politicians are a bunch of wusses that won't do anything about it. That's how you starve an intelligent, creative, colourful, proud nation.

      This embargo is a crime against the Cuban people, it's stupid and has yet to produce any positive result. Cuba is an incredible business oportunity for the capitalist World. Please tell your politicians to stop being assholes, I'll tell mine to stop being wusses.

  31. How other than voting? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    US citizens are responsible for the actions of their government. I was too young to vote until October 1998. So how can I be responsible for the actions of my government that occurred before January 1999, when the House of Representatives elected in November 1998 took office? And how can I be responsible for the actions of the neoconservative administration that I explicitly voted against? What should I do first to change the direction of the U.S. Government?