Slashdot Mirror


Activation Problems in iPhone Paradise

Thomas Hawk writes "Unfortunately it appears that some activations of Apple's new iPhone have gone badly. After waiting in line 36 hours I'm still unable to activate my phone. I'm documenting the AT&T circus call by call on my blog. I've had my hold calls dropped, been patched into other users unable to activate their phone instead of AT&T customer service reps, been told that my wife must get a new phone and that the family plan can't work for me. I've been told that the problem is that I'm not putting a new chip into my iPhone in the slot on the left side of my phone when no slot there exists. PR Blogger Steve Rubel has also been documenting his problems on his Twitterstream. According to an unscientific poll being conducted by Engadget about half of the people who bought iPhones have had activation trouble with about 38% of problems still unresolved." Even the folks at MacWorld weren't immune to these issues.

75 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Never saw it coming! by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Activation problems? With the iPhone being hyped for a year?

    Never saw it coming.

    Especially since AT&T, a company known for shitty service, was given launch rights.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Never saw it coming! by terrymr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think all the mobile phone providers are known for shitty service.

    2. Re:Never saw it coming! by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the other person's problem thingy, it states quite clearly that this is not AT&T's problem, but it is a problem with iTunes and the iPhone.

    3. Re:Never saw it coming! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially since AT&T, a company known for shitty service, was given launch rights.

      But, but but!

      Apple's going to fix the entire cell phone industry with the iPhone! Surely they wouldn't have chosen the worst servicing, most predatory monopolist of the cell phone industry to be their partner?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Never saw it coming! by KiahZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, they did choose the most predatory monopolist of the cell phone industry, but Verizon said no.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    5. Re:Never saw it coming! by geddes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think all the mobile phone providers are known for shitty service. I have to disagree. I have had nothing but excellent service from T-Mobile, and I mean truly excellent. Their phone reps are not only friendly and helpful, but WELL TRAINED. They understand the different models, the plans, SIM cards, unlocking, and will help you with anything. I even called T-Mobile once lost in Salt Lake City, looking for a wi-fi hotspot. I read them the name of the street I was on and the rep gave me step-by-step directions, and stayed with me on the phone. It was awesome. I really want an iPhone, but I am loathe to leave T-Mobile for this reason. Hearing stories like this makes me even more reluctant to buy an iPhone. Good customer service is so rare these days. Why didn't apple go with T-Mobile? Or rather, why did they have an exclusive deal with anyone the great thing about gsm is that it is interoperable. AT&T isn't subsidizing the price, or so I hear, so what possible advantage does apple get from the relationship? "Innovative Network features like visual voicemail." Fine, I would be happier with an iPhone without visual voicemail that I could put my T-Mobile SIM into.
    6. Re:Never saw it coming! by Palpitations · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for Cingular for quite a while before they merged with AT&T - and for a while afterwards. My jobs ranged from fraud prevention to customer service. My position in fraud prevention was the most interesting, as a large part of the fraud we saw was from cell phone dealers themselves. They'd steal credit card information from one customer, tell the rest of their customers that they could come pay their bills at the store with cash (when they weren't authorized to do that), pocket the cash, and then use the stolen card to pay the bills. When you see 100+ accounts paid with the same credit card, you know something is up. That said, before AT&T moved in, my job was basically to help people. I was in a position where I called people who were using a lot more minutes than their plan offered, and instead of charging them the insane amount they would have paid for going over, I offered to switch them to a plan that would cover their usage. The most extreme example that comes to mind is someone who had used so many minutes over their plan that their next bill would have been well over $2,000 - they were flagged, I called them, and convinced them to switch from the lowest priced plan to the highest priced one, because that meant they would save about $1,800 a month. How's that for customer service? Sure, we could have just stuck that guy with a $2,000 bill, and put his nuts in a vice. But we did the right thing - we looked for customers who would be hurt and spent our time, money, and resources to help them out. Guess what one of the first programs that got cut was when AT&T took over?

    7. Re:Never saw it coming! by theturtle32 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My 8gb iPhone activated no problem but then the speaker didn't work ... No rings no music without headphones, no speakerphone. So I took it back to the apple store at the grove in los angeles and they replaced it with a new one on the spot, even though they were supposedly out of them. They had enough foresight to keep a bunch on hand to be able to offer replacements for people who had problems. That's good customer service. They switched the sim card from my broken phone to the new one so that when i went to re activate it (yes I had to take it home and plug it back in to iTunes to get the new one to work) it wouldnt start charging me for two iphone plans. I am a very happy iPhone customer. Its not perfect but its better than anything else on the market. Its what I'm typing this message on now.

    8. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been with T-Mobile for years, and have had nothing but the best service and help on the few times I've called the reps. After knowing all the horror stories from other providers, I'm grateful that I'm with them.

    9. Re:Never saw it coming! by sokoban · · Score: 2, Funny

      Verizon does have pretty good coverage.

      It reaches all the way to their headquarters in Malebolge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malebolge)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    10. Re:Never saw it coming! by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I never understood this either. Assuming an iPhone costs $600, why not just sell them in the Apple store and let customers sort their own phone plan out. Yes it might mean some inconvenience setting up stuff like WAP / SMS etc. which are provider specific, but nothing I'm sure some setup software couldn't have sorted. Most GSM phone providers will sell SIM kits, and most really couldn't care what phone you use on their network just so long as you use their network.

      All Apple have done by their move is ensure that anyone buying their phone package is locked into a contract that with the phone costs anywhere upwards of $2000 for two years. That represents absolutely terrible value for money. You really would have to be blinded by the hype to buy an iPhone on those terms. It's an utter waste of money especially considering other technical deficiencies such as lack of 3G. Perhaps a firmware update will fix that issue because there's going to be some severe buyers remorse if an updated model appears with that feature.

    11. Re:Never saw it coming! by arth1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They may be helpful if you talk to them, but T-Mobile's web site is about the worst mess I've ever had the misfortune of using. Every single time I visit "My T-Mobile", I have to explain to the web site that I don't have any of the phones listed. And because of that, half the site is not available. Including support -- you have to choose a phone model before you can look up support information for something that's NOT device related!
      And half the time I try to pay my bill, the system is "temporarily" unavailable, and won't let me.

      As for the iPhone -- have anyone bought an unfettered iPhone yet, which /wasn't/ bundled with a plan? (Not "unlocked", but one that never was locked in the first place.) If so, what's the experience in getting it activated with an already existing SIM card?

    12. Re:Never saw it coming! by tacocat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many GSM providers are nationwide in the USA? AT&T, T-Mobile, anyone else?

      They couldnt' set up a service with Verizon Wireless (an example) because they just don't do GSM technology.

      It's unfortunate that AT&T is so clueless on this coming out of the gate. I think the iPhone has mind numbing potential. GSM is the right choice if you consider a world wide market, but not for US market, because GSM is more widely used globally. Economy of scale in units manufactured dictate that they go with GSM for a global market.

      If you look at the techcentric nations of the world, the United States is not the leading country. We don't have the digital high speed cellular networks or internet broad band speeds of other nations. I just don't think you can safely market a product of this type to only the USA when we have a global market to consider.

    13. Re:Never saw it coming! by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm really sick of this weak argument against the iPhone when there are SO many valid things it is really lacking compared to "free" cell phones providers are giving away with 2 years of service (speed dial, changing ring tones, Bluetooth object transfer, voice dial, swappable batteries, MMS, Bluetooth tethering, etc.).

      Perhaps you can escape the plan, but does that include an unlock code? Can you even unlock your iPhone?

      Perhaps I'm spoilt from living in Europe. Most ~ $60 price plans would get you any phone for nothing or a small fee. That includes models like the Palm Treo 750, Blackberry models etc. We'll have to wait and see what happens when the iPhone appears in Europe. It wouldn't surprise me if Vodafone, O2 etc. engage in a little rape of their own if there are people dumb enough pay for one and sign up for a high contract.

    14. Re:Never saw it coming! by jkabbe · · Score: 3, Informative

      why not just sell them in the Apple store and let customers sort their own phone plan out

      Because visual voice mail apparently required changes to AT&T's network. I doubt AT&T would've made that commitment if Apple were selling iPhones that could be used on T-moble as well (and vice-versa for T-mobile).

    15. Re:Never saw it coming! by RESPAWN · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I happened to be in an AT&T store this weekend* and overheard a couple of people complaining to the store reps that they couldn't activate their iPhone. Their problem actually lied in being unable to install XP SP2 on their computer, but like most non-technologically inclined consumers they didn't understand that this was a PC/Microsoft problem. They were pissed and the poor Cingular/AT&T/name-of-the-day reps had no idea how to help the customers. And who can blame the customers either? They just spent $500-$600 on a new "superphone" and can't even use the thing.

      I played with the iPhone and it is a very cool phone. Just like the iPod, the iPhone interface is extremely intuitive. My only complaint was that I found the onscreen keyboard hard to use. Without any sort of tactile feedback, such as what I get with my current QWERTY keyed phone, I found that I had a lot of mistyped letters on the screen. That would probably be a deal breaker for me, personally.

      I really want the iPhone to succeed because it is a cool product with a lot of cool new ideas. The more the iPhone succeeds the better the market on the whole will get, as more and more competitors start including many of the iPhone's features. But I just can't help but wonder if the iPhone will ever be able to live up to its own hype.

      *Note: while I refuse to give Cingular any more of my money after the way they treated me before, like a good little geek I did have to play with the demo phones in the store. If the next version of the iPhone is released on a cross-carrier basis and it's a little more reasonably priced, I would probably consider it.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    16. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      How many GSM providers are national in the USA? ZERO. Not one of them has a network with "home" service where I live or with ANY service in most of the places I spend time other than home and the office. You may find it surprising, but that vast middle part of the country is part of the nation, and it is by and large CDMA-only. It sucks, too. And here's AT&T, whose shitty service doesn't surprise me given that they lie about having the largest digital voice and data network in the country, given that only a CDMA provider with lots of good partnering agreements.

    17. Re:Never saw it coming! by klaun · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably because AT&T is shitty - which means they need the money

      I have trouble understanding why you were moderated insightful, since publicly available information disproves the second part of your hypothesis.

      Total revenue for AT&T first quarter of this year was $28 million compared to $22 million for Verizon and much smaller numbers for others... Leader in market share for wireless at 27.1%

      I think the more likely explanation is AT&T is much, much larger than any other GSM provider in the U.S. (As in more than twice as large... subscriber-wise). By far has the most GSM network infrastructure and bandwidth. I think the desperate hurting for money thesis is totally ludicrous.

      I'm really interested in more info on what the nature of the activation issue is, so I'm disappointed that all the articles I read on it seem to be Apple fanboys saying "it definitely can't be Apple's fault, must be AT&T." But they don't provide any details... Most GSM phones don't need to be "activated" at all... put a(n appropriate) SIM card in and it works. What happens during activation? And before launch I heard that you'd be able to activate via iTunes at home... What happened to that?

    18. Re:Never saw it coming! by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 2, Informative

      One word: Visual Voice Mail
      Or maybe three if you don't hyphenate it or something =)

      I recall a big deal about how Cingular had to make changes on their backend systems to be able to support this feature. The iPhone won't fully work on any system that doesn't have this functionality, and if it's not done exactly the same way, then there will have to be code changes and exceptions for each and every one.

      Why exclusive? Call providers like that... it was probably the only way Apple could get one to carry it... the only way to guarantee enough revenue to make supporting this weird phone worthwhile /tis only my guess

    19. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mind if I ask which town and/or county that is? I am in a city of 80,000 on an interstate corridor and Apple says no way, AT&T says partner service only (and even that is dubious), etc.

    20. Re:Never saw it coming! by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if this round of problems were due to ATT's customer service, the buck still stops at Apple because they chose to go exclusively with ATT, which makes it all Apple's problem.

      Certainly, they also chose to go with CMDA, which basically limits them to ATT or T-Mobile, but just about every other phone in the US market seems to be able to produce both a GSM and CMDA version, so why couldn't the iPhone? Producing a couple models of the iPhone that could were sold contract-independent, were sold in the Apple store and would work with all the major US carriers would have been a step towards revolutionizing the cellphone industry. As it is now, Apple's just produced more of the same with a pretty and intuitive UI.

      Nifty, not revolutionary.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    21. Re:Never saw it coming! by narf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iTunes activation process is what reads the SIM card ID# and links it to your new (or old) AT&T account. For some reason I'm not privvy to, your old sim card cannot be used. You get told to put the new one back in if you try using your old sim. And unlike any other phone I've used, there really is an activation process on the iPhone. Until the phone is activated by AT&T, it's completely unusable apart from emergency calls. No iPod, no camera, no nothin'.

      The real problem is that nobody at AT&T or Apple seem to really know whats going on during the process, and because both companies are involved, it's easy for their reps to blame each other. For example, my activation process took about 14 hours. About 13 hours into the process I called AT&T and was told that there was a problem with the porting of my old number (wrong acct # given by me) ... but that it shouldn't affect the activation of my phone. Yet, 5 minutes after getting an e-mail saying the port was sucessful, the phone activated. In the grand scheme of things, 14 hours isn't a big deal, it's just fustrating to have the device in your hands, totally unusable.

      I think most people are blaming AT&T because Apple is usually fanatical about the 'customer experience' and most phone companies act like they'd really prefer you just died.

    22. Re:Never saw it coming! by bluemonq · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction. They couldn't set up a service with Verizon Wireless because Verizon wouldn't kowtow to Apple's demands. Apple went to Verizon first.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/30/verizon_tu rned_down_iphone/

    23. Re:Never saw it coming! by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the grand scheme of things, 14 hours isn't a big deal, it's just fustrating to have the device in your hands, totally unusable.

      You're a f*cking lunatic. A six hundred dollar brick you have to haggle over for 14 hours, before it will do anything? That's insane. I'm sorry, but I'd attach the receipt to the damn thing and throw it back through a store window, but that's just me.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  2. Apple - because things just work! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Eventually)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  3. A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind that AT&T is turning on more cell phone accounts at once than anyone has ever done in the history of the cell phone industry. iPhone sales have either hit a million units already, or they will by the end of the coming week. If they perform at 99.9%, that's still going to be a thousand people running into problems.

    Everyone I know who's gotten one so far had it activated in a couple of minutes. The real story here is how smoothly it's going overall.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't like they are a new company or haven't done this before.

      When other new huge phones launch, there is often a flurry of activations, and I do believe AT&T has been in the phone business a while.

      Let's be honest here. The problem is that this is new in how they're handling activation. Because Apple has a such a large say in this whole process, it suddenly becomes less clear who is responsible for what. You introduce new policies, procedures and hardware at once, you're going to get SNAFUs.

      This isn't being a hater, but simply being objective. Apple has done some things rather well, and others not so well. For a company that does claim to have things "just work", they made the activation process more complicated than it needs to be.

      Just activate in-store like any other cell phone.

      That is having it "just work".

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you in such a snit about? Pissed off because you didn't buy AAPL shares?

      I based my estimate on the reports that Apple had made three million units for the launch, the fact that AT&T ran out of them, that several of the Apple stores did as well, and that those stores are getting restocked daily. I was at the Valley Fair store in Santa Clara on Friday, and I saw a much bigger line than I ever saw for a previous event. Friends of mine who went by that same store today and yesterday have told me that the store looked like the post-thanksgiving rush.

      My POINT is that AT&T is turning on more accounts at once than anyone has before, and they're doing a very good job of it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did quite a bit of testing, actually. That's why we're not getting reports of tens of thousands of people having problems.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:A bit of perspective. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the problems arise from the owner living outside the area code of the original line.

      I really don't think that it helps that maybe several hundred thousand transfers and activations are happening at the same time, basically 6pm ET to 7pm PT. I don't think it happens very often.

      Having it done in iTunes on the whole, probably improved the experience for 95%+ of the buyers, otherwise the lines would have taken maybe two or three times longer to finish.

    5. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It improved the experience for 95% of the buyers?

      Then why did 50% of them report problems?

      Something doesn't add up right. Anytime I've purchased a phone, it worked when I left the store. I didn't need to do anything else.

      Last time I checked, Microsoft got hit with a fine over half a BILLION dollars for bundling their media player. If I want to watch something with the Quicktime codec, Apple bundles iTunes into the Quicktime download, and forces people to download iTunes if you want to activate their phone. And apparently, if you have a 64-bit OS, you need to change your OS as well.

      How exactly is that an improvement?

      What was the number? Some 38% are still unresolved. Clearly this is a huge improvement over walking out of the store with a working phone.

      I will never understand this site. People blast Microsoft all day long for forcing people to do things in proprietary ways, and then give Apple a free pass for the same tactics.

      Objective, reasonable human beings should be able to call out what they see.

      Activation of the iPhone is unnecessarily proprietary, and a hassle. And quite frankly I run Win x64, and Gentoo x64 at home. If an Apple representative told me I needed to format my computer and install another OS for their phone, I'd be flat-out irate. But again, this is a huge improvement in your eyes.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:A bit of perspective. by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When other new huge phones launch, there is often a flurry of activations, and I do believe AT&T has been in the phone business a while.

      Yeah, but this was a phone launch like no other. I'm not just being the fanboi here. I've never seen a line outside a cellular phone store for anything. (Well, to get tech support at lunch time, maybe...) Cell providers just aren't prepared to handle this kind of burst buying.

      Case in point, I got my iPhone at an AT&T store. For each person who bought a phone they sat us down, asked us a few questions, got our payment info, etc. Took about 10 minutes, and they had maybe five sales guys processing customers. From when the line started moving (I was #34 in line) it took about an hour before I was driving away. For contrast, my friends who bought at an Apple store were out in half the time, and there were more customers there than at the AT&T store I went to.

      Bottom line, Apple knows how to handle hype generated high volume sales. (They know how to create hype, natch...) The public's never gotten so excited about a cell phone before, so cell providers are unaccustomed to the phenomena. Hopefully they'll learn...
    7. Re:A bit of perspective. by ronin510 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before I comment on Apple's availability, it's interesting you say AT&T's website states that the iPhone is in stock, when there seems to be no way to check an AT&T retail store's personal stock (aside from AT&T putting out a news blurb that their retail stores are sold out). Buying from AT&T's website isn't a possibility, since they tell you to go to Apple.com, which is this link: http://www.apple.com/iphone/buy/ , which states you can only buy the iPhone at Apple's online store, Apple's retail stores, and AT&T's retail stores. Apple's stores still list ship times of 2-4 weeks. I'll just take it as a simple error on your part.

      I don't doubt that you'll find Apple stores that aren't sold out. Analysts are showing figures of up to 1,000 iPhones per Apple retail store. With 168 retail stores, they have sold an estimated 128,000 units (not including AT&T store sales) on launch day. 168 stores times an estimated 1,000 units each gives about 168,000. source:Bloomberg Piper Jaffray has said sales of 200,000 units at launch (AT&T and Apple) were expected and met. Also, most of the sold-out Apple retail stores are in California, where if you were to separate the state from the rest of United States, it would still have the 5th largest economy in the world. I'm sure Apple's smart enough to realize this and place more stock in the California stores.

      For first weekend figures, I must say that's pretty good, especially for a $499/$599 phone on a non-holiday shopping season. That's over $100 million in revenue in a couple days. Apple retail stores that are currently out of stock have stated that they should be receiving shipments in constant intervals. Instead of an artificial shortage, Apple seems to actually be prepared for demand.

    8. Re:A bit of perspective. by shmlco · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Just activate in-store like any other cell phone."

      You think people are having problems now? A Piper Jay analyst said Apple has probably sold a half-million phones this weekend. I waited in line, then once inside the store, paid and had my phone in two minutes. Went to an WiFi-enabled restaurant nearby and was activated in three more, while I had some coffee.

      So given that, the Apple store I went to processed an entire line of 200 people in an hour and a half, and I'd saw a quarter of those at least bought two phones.

      Now. Picture a half-million people standing in line and having store employees REQUIRED to do all activations, transfers, credit checks, purchases, and all the other garbage usually associated with buying a phone, and now taking 10, 15, or even 20-minutes with each one. Now THAT would have been a disaster.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    9. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe because it's full of untrue garbage?

      -50% of users didn't report problems. 50% of poll respondents did. They're definitely not the same group in this poll. Reuters, a *reputable* news source not relying on an open poll, pegs the number at 2%.
      -Off topic rant about proprietary software. There's no such thing as an "open" phone activation system, and presumably people want to use this as an iPod as well (which out of the box requires iTunes, too--alternatives for the iPhone post-activation can't be far off). Microsoft's fine wasn't for bundling. It was for bundling after being convicted of an illegal monopoly (key word: ILLEGAL, not just a simple monopoly, which Apple doesn't have in the first place).
      - In store activations would have made lines move slower than molasses in January. Since 38% didn't actually have problems, it's a moot point, but assuming for a moment they did, 38% of activation problems is better than 100% having 5x the wait.
      -"Activation of the iPhone is unnecessarily proprietary" just about sums up the ludicrous comment. Letting you do it yourself, on your own computer, is a time saver. Buying it to use on an unsupported platform is a pretty stupid thing to do, no matter how much you want the stupid thing. For 95% of computer owners, it poses no problem. It wasn't designed to work for the other 5%, so complaining that it's a hassle is kind of a "duh" moment.

  4. I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by adam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am aware of the activation problems, especially after seeing this looooong thread on Apple's own forums. However, with regard to the engadget poll, I would be wary of its results-- there are many people who are "haters" of the Apple products, of the iPhone, etc, and I suspect many people who don't own iPhones are responding anyway saying they have activation problems, to skew the poll. My experience has been generally good.. bought 4 phones (I discussed yesterday), and three of them activated almost immediately. My primary phone, our biz dev guy's phone, our operations director.. no problem. The fourth, got the notorious "we need more time to complete this activation" (I was porting a second line, after porting my primary line from t-mobile). After about 12 hours, it started receiving texts, and within 24hrs it was ringing at the correct number. I called t-mobile tonight to cancel my service (40hr mark, or so) and they told me the second number has yet to fully release and to call back tomorrow to confirm it released and my service was fully cancelled.

    I admit not to have much technical knowhow with respec to the inner workings of this process, but I don't imagine it's entirely any one aspect.. AT&T, Apple, etc. It's probably due to the slowness of every vendor involved (those releasing numbers, etc) and the sheer volume of registrations over the last 72hrs.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually he is just stating a fact, that a unscientific poll does not = everyone having issues. Everyone I know who has gotten one has all had not one issue with it except one, who had a pre-existing ATT account which many people who have issues, ALSO have had.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by BlueTrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple should force users to enter some iPhoneID to be able to post in the technical problems section to avoid spams and false information.

      But did you consider also the fact that not all the people who have problems will log on to Apple forums to post or vote in the poll ?

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    3. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      there are many people who are "haters" of the Apple products, of the iPhone, etc, and I suspect many people who don't own iPhones are responding anyway saying they have activation problems, to skew the poll.


      I really don't buy that 'haters' are skewing the poll significantly. It's possible, sure, but... it really comes off as sounding unlikely to me.

      That said, there's no way that 33% or more of iPhone customers are having serious activation problems. That would be many, many hundreds of thousands of people. If that were the case, there'd be news stories galore, all over CNN etc. We'd all (not just a few of us) know people who were suffering activation problems.

      The OP is certainly correct in this -- it's an unscientific poll that doesn't mean much. Any online poll like that will suffer from selection bias. That bias could be 'haters', but it's much more likely that people having troubles activating are out actively searching for information, and, more likely to find such a poll and, in turn, much more likely to respond to such a poll than people who have the phone perfectly activated and are relaxing and enjoying their phones.

      (To the OP, I wanted to see the results and cheerfully answered -- lying -- that I'd had no problems activating my non-existent iPhone. So at least I biased it the other way!)

      I'm biased btw, I think the iPhone is nice, but ludicrously overhyped, and anyone who waited a long time in line for it is out to lunch.

      But I suspect the OP's experience (2 of 4 phones activating perfectly, one almost perfectly, and the fourth within 24 hours) is par for the course. And, frankly, considering what a mess AT&T's systems are, I think that's an impressive achievement for Apple.

      If we took a WAG (wild-assed guess), there are almost certainly thousands of people with serious activation problems. There might even be tens of thousands. A hundred thousand? I doubt it, but perhaps possible. Even at the 100k mark, that'd be one in 15 customers. 6.7%. Considering it's mobiles and AT&T involved, that actually sounds very good to me, though painful for those with problems.

      Granted, if there are still many thousands of people with serious problems in several days time, that'd be quite bad.

      As someone who isn't an iPhone fan, it looks like a pretty decent launch. Though I still shake my head at those waiting in line.
    4. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Vincman · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's one big unscientific aspect about that poll, at least when I tried to vote on it. You can only see the results if you voted. So how many people do you think just clicked any option to see the results?

      A couple of people, including me, mentioned it in the comments and Engadget should've changed it right away. Just another reason to question blogs as an authentic media source.

    5. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by m0nstr42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If that were the case, there'd be news stories galore, all over CNN etc.


      http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/ptech/07/02/iphone.ap /index.html#cnnSTCText

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19539747/

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,287638,00.html

      All linked off their main pages.
  5. Well, I'm happy by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not because I hate Apple or AT&T ... but because I just went through the process of upgrading a seven-year-old phone (Sprint). And it was a pain in the ass. I went through customer support hell, inconsistent stories, runarounds, transfers ... I was thinking the whole time, "holy shit, people upgrade phones all the time, why the hell does this have to happen to me?"

    Well, as of this weekend, I completed the month-long process of upgrading ... and I'm just glad to know I'm not the only one who has to go through a stressful activation process :-)

  6. The Engadget Poll by Necroman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Poll that Engadget had about the service problems was fairly badly put together. The only way to be able to see results is to vote first. For for all the people that don't even have iPhones, they had to choose 1 of the 3 options before they could see the results. Since there was no "I Don't have an iPhone" options, it severally screwed with the results.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
    1. Re:The Engadget Poll by mr_matticus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only that, but the respondents are self-selecting (why would the "happy middle," who have no stake in spreading their tales of joy, even respond to the poll? While a higher percentage of early adopters probably read Engadget, it's still a small minority of the market. How about the benefit of iPhone haters claiming problems just to stir the pot?) and don't have to "prove" that they even have an iPhone. It's basically the same as asking, "what's your opinion about Windows Vista after purchase?" without taking any further steps.

      Are we really willing to believe that 13,000 iPhone customers responded to a poll on a tech-nerd website like Engadget? If that's even remotely accurate, that should indicate the high sales rate of the iPhone. But then again, it's similar to the response rate of every other Engadget poll, so it's probably total crap.

      For the record, I don't care either way whether or not 38% of customers had activation trouble or not. I don't care whether 100,000 iPhones sold or 2 million did. It's a neat gadget, but my life isn't riding on it.

  7. Badly chosen launch date by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lesson: do not launch product that requires extensive customer service at the beginning of a weekend.

    The general observation seems to be that activation from a cold start works OK, but anything that requires "number portability" from a previous account may be troublesome. That's no surprise; number portability is usually a mess, because the carriers don't want you to use that Government-mandated feature.

    It's still not clear why activation should require a separate computer. Activation via iTunes might be a nice option if you already use iTunes, but it shouldn't be the main route. After all, the iPhone has its very own Internet connection.

  8. gadgets by wall0159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone looks like a great piece of tech, and I might get one someday. But...

    It seems like Slashdot has a greater and greater proportion of articles that relate to gadgets (stuff to buy), and fewer and fewer that are about tech developments, science, etc. I'm not bitching about Slashdot, but is it really the case that nerds have become merely watered-down gear-freaks, and no longer employ their mind in the pursuit of knowledge?

    Please, oh true nerds, answer my rallying cry!

    1. Re:gadgets by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Interesting

      iPhone, and Apple articles in general, attract fans (and anti-fans), rather than nerds/geeks. The difference between tech-fans and geeks is the difference between religionists and mystics. Fandom is, at the end of the day, a dependent relationship of admiration and respect for the cultural authority of some producer or another. That's antithetical to the nerd distance from the "marketed product" and the interest on how it could work and what could be done with it.

      I'll admit it: I think fannishness of any stripe is a kind of cultural servitude.

  9. i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by adam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not trying to shift blame at all. I said myself that 25% of the phones I purchased had activation problems. But I don't posit that as evidence that 25% of *ALL* iphones have had activation problems. Look at the replied to my last three comments (which all got modded +5, btw), and you'll find the exact people i'm talking about who may have clicked "my phone is still unactivated!" when they don't even own one. (for the lazy, comments: here | here | here)

    Replied to those comments, you'll see people who said they would laugh at me/whomever they saw on the street using an iPhone, people calling me stupid/dumb, calling those in lines "emo retards," calling those in line "suckers," etc. Now, most people who choose not to buy an iPhone just do so out of logical choice, and that's the extent of their involvement.. but there most definitely is a vocal minority that feels slighted by Apple.. I really don't know exactly why, but I can say for sure that when I spent $600 a piece on my unlocked Treos (as did many others a few years ago), I don't recall a sizable portion of people calling me retarded/dumb/etc. The fact is a lot of people online have some sort of irrational distaste for the iPhone, and for those that buy it. And I don't believe that 40% of the people who bought the phone so far are still without service (as noted in the poll). I suspect it's in the single digit percentile, which still sucks if you're in that group, but 40% it isn't. I even posted a link to the Apple discussion page that has hundreds if not thousands of relies from people with activation problems.. but Apple is quickly approaching the "million iPhones sold" mark, and I don't imagine that of those million there will be several hundred thousand that take 48+hrs to navigate an activation quagmire. But hey, maybe I'm just lucky in my experiences. Engadget even noted themselves that they've activated 6 iphones without any problems.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by mr_matticus · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't have to care about Apple at all to know that 38% of people aren't having problems with activation. Just ask Reuters. They say 2%, and I trust their sources infinitely more than an Engadget poll with roughly the same number of responses as every other Engadget poll and absolutely no mechanism to restrict responses--two clicks to a vote is an easy target.

    2. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by TrekkieGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't know exactly why, but I can say for sure that when I spent $600 a piece on my unlocked Treos (as did many others a few years ago), I don't recall a sizable portion of people calling me retarded/dumb/etc. The fact is a lot of people online have some sort of irrational distaste for the iPhone, and for those that buy it.

      It's the publicity. The iPhone was hyped up a lot more than treos. Heck, most people have never heard of the treo, but everyone seems to know about the iPhone. The end result is that more people end up wanting them, but since they have decided not to get it for one reason or another, they're mad at you for getting one. See, in their mind, you're ensuring that they will never get one. Since you're helping the iPhone to be successful by buying it, Apple has no motivation to change the iPhone to cater to their wishes (lower price, different network, dev kit). Since you didn't hold out like they did for the same reasons, they feel like you're retarded/dumb/etc, when in reality you just don't care about the same things they do.

      I hate to admit that the reason why I understand that motivation so well is because I've suffered from it. I don't particularly care about the iPhone but there have been plenty of products that I *really* wanted to fail because they were really good but contained a serious deal-breaker for me. I voted with my wallet and got really frustrated when others didn't. Or rather, they did, but they didn't care about the issue that was important to me. Now, I was smart enough to understand what it was that I was feeling and why, and thus I didn't lash out at those people, but the irrational anger was there.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    3. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by doxology · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO, the main reason so many people hate Apple is because of their incessantly annoying fanboys.

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
  10. We dont care!! by stox · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're the phone company, we don't have to.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  11. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    "If it makes calls and texts, then it's fine"

    no it's not, for $499 it'd want to suck my fat cock 3 times a day

  12. Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 5, Informative
    The summary fails to mention one of the (I believe) more informational parts of the story...

    http://thomashawk.com/2007/07/hot-donkey-after-36- hours-we-just.html

    Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Haaaalllleeeeejuuuuuahhhhh!

    We just did it. After probably 20 or so phone calls to numerous departments all over Apple and AT&T we finally found the *right* department who can actually activate iPhones with you online, on the spot.

    The magic number, and you will want to write this one down, is 877-800-3701. A special shout out and thanks to Scott Francis who left us a comment with the key to getting this whole mess solved. Apparently this is the one place at AT&T where they can actually activate your iPhone with you online. It was about a 20 minute hold and about a 10 minute process but the iPhone is now activated.

    Thanks to everyone who spent the last day plus with us on ZooomrTV while we got it activated. It's been a fun ride. Now time to play with the phone and figure it out.
    --
    Ramen
    1. Re:Link to resolution of problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary fails to mention one of the (I believe) more informational parts of the story...

      Oops, you quoted the wrong part, from the comments:

      you are an idiot. i saw several ppl trying to help you in the zooomr chat and you ignored their suggestions, choosing instead to milk the story. how funny that the solution you eventually was the same as the one they suggested. if you had spent more time trying to solve the problem and less time on a broadcasting ego-trip then maybe you wouldn't have wasted so much of your weekend on hold and could have spent it with the children instead.
    2. Re:Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't feel I need to apologize for skipping that. I tend to give less attention to anonymous posters, whether on /. or elsewhere.

      ACs tend to be more inflammatory and abrasive than is necessary, which they probably would not had they put their name (or pseudonym as the case may be) behind what they say.

      I will add, and others have caught this as well, that the "magic number" he mentioned is the same number he was given in an e-mail when a problem was first identified.

      --
      Ramen
    3. Re:Link to resolution of problem by doctorisham · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether you are applauding the AC on posting the captions, or attempting to flame me, but at any rate I don't recall accusing you of anything. So why would an apology even be implied? It seems the submitter is the one we should be upset with, as he had the "holier than thou" attitude that caused his 2 day horror. Especially considering the answer laid right in front of him, and he chose to ignore it.

  13. Re:no problem for me by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Posting fromm iPhone. :)

    how's that lack of tactile feedback workin' out for ya?

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  14. my experience by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Posting this from my iPhone. I had trouble activating at first too. After waiting 10 hours I figured out that the problem was with transfering my old verizon phone number. I asked them to cancel the activation and started again with a new number -- went through immediately.

    You cant do anything with the phone until its activated, no ipod, photos, nothing except calling 911. So the wait can be frustrating, and its very hard to get info out of ATT.

  15. Re:no problem for me by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Funny

    how's that lack of tactile feedback workin' out for ya?

    It's ffffffuckin' aaawesommmmme!1!
  16. No porblmes at all by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm ptsonig tihs form my iPnhoe, and I'm gald to say taht I've had no porblmes wsoeavrthr!

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  17. Re:no problem for me by XaXXon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    both mine activated fine at about 7pm pacific.

    As far as the keyboard, it's one of my favorite parts. Not having used any type of small-form-factor keyboard extensively, after 5 minutes, I was typing far faster than I ever had on a blackberry-style device (which I've played with for similar short periods of time).

  18. Re:Enough by Icarus1919 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's why I came to this thread to post about it!

  19. Simple answer by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this has been explained elsewhere, but here seems as good a place as any for me to ask the question: How is Cingular/AT&T not being to be a disaster for Apple.

    Because we hate all cell carriers. We expect to hate the cell carrier.

    After activation is complete though, we don't really have to talk to the cell-phone carrier. Then we just have the phone experience, which is great. That's when cell service may start to arise as an issue, but we've also been trained to accept that as a fact of life.

    One thing Apple did well right off the bat is to not have to have us activate at the store, already a better expereince for most people despite the problems some are having. I myself am porting a T-Mobile number - while the number itself is not yet ported (and may take days more as T-Mobile apparently ports pay-as-you-go numbers by hand) the actual activation of my phone worked just fine, and I was abe to make calls and otherwise use the device almost instantly - it's only incoming calls and SMS I can't get just yet.

    Frankly I expect a lot of issues to vanish Monday, when the regular people get to work instead of the poor weekend shift.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Re:And? by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's like jewelry - a status symbol. People buy jewelry not because they are doing optics experiments or need a portable glass-cutting tool. iPhone has a potential to be eventually usable for making calls, but given that the battery in it is not replaceable (now we know for sure!) it is clear that iPhone is designed as a toy, to be a toy, and it is sold at a price of an intricate toy as well. In other words, it is not a businessman's strong and solid weapon of communication - it's a gentle, flimsy and feminine fashion apparel.

  21. He's up and running now... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA says it took 36 hours, but he's all sorted out.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  22. ZOMG! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Brand new product fails to have flawless launch. Film at eleven on The No Fucking Kidding News Network.

  23. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Layth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think full internet browsing on mobile devices is a brand new thing, you need to need your head out of your ass and take a better look around.

  24. Re:Enough by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, I really hate reading about the PS3. So you know what I do (this is a secret, so don't let anyone else hear about it), I stop reading after I come across the word PS3. Most articles about the PS3 include it in the heading. I have installed this special widget in firefox called a scroll bar (you can probably download it from somewhere), and I scroll past the story.

    I used to click on every PS3 story and complain about it, but then I realised that I was just being a complete wanker, and stopped.

    So, how the fuck do you get moderated up, how many stupid people really hate iphone stories, but still feel the need to click on the link, and read all the comments to the end. What a bunch of retards.

  25. Not Surprising by ghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know about shitty but it is kind of expected that all the wireless providers will have the same level of service as 95% of US providers (by customer base) use the same software to run their systems - Amdocs Ensemble. So it all works the same way. The only difference is in marketing and how big a smile you get at their stores. Even the CRM runs on AMDOCS Clarify so all the call center reps are working from the same script.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  26. hahaha.. lap it up.. by sqldr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From this article..

    "I can't think of another product launch that has been like this. When we went into the store I was almost moved to tears, it just made you feel really special."

    "Nothing matches this - it's like going to a rock concert. As I went down the stairs in the store I was thinking 'this is what Sting feels'."

    "It feels great, oh my God, overwhelming. I never thought this day would come - and now it finally has, it's mind-blowing,"

    "I'm going to run home and ring people just to say 'Guess what, I've got an iPhone, bye!"

    You SAD, SAD, HORRIBLE, PATHETIC people..

    It's just a phone!!

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  27. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait. Gay people get free phones? I need to get in on this!

    Switching can be difficult, but not nearly as bad as getting out of a cell phone contract!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  28. Not true by avdp · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not true for this GSM phone, or any other GSM phone sold in the US. Unlike in Europe, where such practice is illegal, the US cell phone carrier lock their phones to their SIMS. You can't used a AT&T GSM phone on the T-Mobile network, or vice versa UNLESS you manage to convince the provider to unlock your phone (or in the alternative, find a way to unlock it, usually for a fee, from the internet). The justification for this practice is that phones are heavily subsidized by the carrier in the US (you pay a small fraction of the actual cost of the phone). The justification for the iPhone (for which you pay FULL price) is that Apple is too greedy?

    The other thing the SIM thing is good for in the US is to switch phone within the same company. i.e. my wife and I are both with T-Mobile, and we decide to switch phone (and keep our respective numbers).

  29. It's only affecting those without enough faith by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The people who REALLY believe in the power of Steve are having no problems with activation. So, if you're having a problem, you have only yourself to blame. Maybe you need to look deep inside yourself and reaffirm your dedication to Steve.

    Steve needs faithful followers, truly dedicated to Apple's world-changing mission. He doesn't need fair-weathered followers, who criticize him or his wonderful products.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  30. GSM coverage in the vast majority of the U.S. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Informative

    GSM coverage is definitely not excellent in the central U.S. plains or the Rocky Mountains. There is coverage now on interstate highways and in cities and larger towns, but smaller towns and highway routes have spotty coverage or none at all. There were a handful of small telephone companies that sprung up to fill the void in the past few years. Two of the largest such have been recently acquired.

    Western Wireless was acquired by Alltel.

    AT&T recently acquired Dobson Communications (which was the largest vendor licensing the Cellular One brand). I think that the "new AT&T" realizes that Verizon will kick their ass if they don't start competing on the coverage front. Nobody can touch Verizon in the U.S. for actually getting a wireless signal in more places.

    The AT&T coverage map is, ahem, optimistic, regarding its coverage in the plains states. The Dobson/Cellular One acquisition helps with this, but not with the rocky mountain states.

    Here is a relatively honest assessment of GSM coverage in the western US: Cellular One coverage map (includes the Dobson network and all the other mom-and-pop licensees of the Cellular One brand).

    The Alltel coverage map is also a little deceptive, because it mixes their GSM network in with their other network, but they provide much better GSM coverage in the west than anybody else, thanks to their acquisition of Western Wireless. Both T-Mobile and AT&T were asleep at the wheel and either should have acquired Western Wireless. It will be more difficult for AT&T to assemble a network which can rival Alltel or Verizon in the west. Fortunately, they are able to lease time on the Alltel network for their customers, as does T-Mobil. Oddly enough, Alltel does not provide GSM service to its own customers.

    It's not clear that AT&T can fix this problem via acquisitions. Alltel already bought the company that AT&T should have acquired. What's left now is a whole bunch of relatively small players. AT&T will need to go on a major buying and building spree if they are really serious about providing nationwide cellular GSM coverage. They have been cherry picking the best (highest population density) markets for years, but they'll need to get serious about providing coverage to the rest of the country if they don't want the "I can't get an iPhone because AT&T doesn't offer service in my area" blogger chorus to drown out their efforts to promote the iPhone beyond the initial product launch. The stock valuations of AT&T and Alltel are interesting, too. AT&T has brand recognition, but they are themselves possibly an acquisition candidate.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.