Slashdot Mirror


Thompson Says Florida Bar Requested Psych Test

MBCook wrote with a link to a GamePolitics story about another chapter of the Jack Thompson saga. Sheila M. Tuma, a person associated with Thompson's Florida Bar evaluation, has requested that the colorful lawyer 'seek psychological testing and accept a 91-day suspension of his law license.'. Though they attempted to confirm this with the Bar, no one was inclined to give the site a comment. "The e-mail explaining the situation was sent to GamePolitics by Thompson himself. The recommendation comes following issues stemming from Thompson's Bully case last year where there were issues regarding his professional conduct."

83 comments

  1. What a Goof by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The man is a complete nut; an attention-seeking media addict. Who really needs psychological testing are the media outlets that continue to give this lunatic a platform.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:What a Goof by endianx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who really needs psychological testing are the media outlets that continue to give this lunatic a platform. Like Slashdot? And you and I?
    2. Re:What a Goof by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      Pot, Kettle. I'm sure you have a lot in common to talk about.

    3. Re:What a Goof by penp · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it.

    4. Re:What a Goof by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know if Id say we're giving him a platform... I believe the GP is talking about "generic talk show" who invites Jack Thompson "video game expert" on the show to speak with the parents about the dangers of the murder simulators they bought.

      Talking about him is one thing... putting him on a pedestal and parading him around like he's some kind of expert with a valuable opinion is a completely different animal.

      I actually think it's benificial that /. talk about his goings ons because when it gets out of line we're prepared to deal with the inevitable aftermath that I'm sure most of us see from friends, family, and co-workers who just happened to see some expert on TV the other day who said that....

    5. Re:What a Goof by Enoxice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I clicked the link. I got as far as the word "screamo" and stopped.

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    6. Re:What a Goof by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who really needs psychological testing are the media outlets that continue to give this lunatic a platform.
      Why is that? The media companies that give him an outlet make money off his attention-whoring -- they are acting quite rationally.

      The real problem are the people who listen to, and believe, the demagogues -- in Thompson's case, because it's easier than addressing causes of violence other than cultural acceptance of it. This is particularly true of those in positions of power.

      Going a little further, the problem (in the US) is that our electoral system + apathetic populace + corporate mass media == positive return on demagoguery. But I really don't want to get sidetracked down that road, so:

      Jack Thompson is not a fool; he might even be unstable; but he fights for something he believes in, and does so pretty well, albeit via use of questionable methods. To belittle him is to belittle the effect he has on free speech issues wrt gaming, and that is a foolish thing to do. If you consider him an enemy, you should analyze his strengths as much as his weakneses.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:What a Goof by MontyApollo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After the Virginia Tech shootings, a local radio station interviewed him and kept referring to him as an "expert on school shootings" but never mentioned that his notoriety actually comes from attacking the video game industry. He slipped video game bashing into every other comment. He would talk about some school shooter and remark that he shot everybody in the head like video games train one to do, then a few comments later he would say some shooter had shot everybody 3 times each - just like video games train one to do.

      Not only did the interviewer not mention his obsession with video games to begin with, he never even commented on, let alone questioned, all of the repeated video game references.

    8. Re:What a Goof by provigilman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I actually think it's benificial that /. talk about his goings ons because when it gets out of line we're prepared to deal with the inevitable aftermath that I'm sure most of us see from friends, family, and co-workers who just happened to see some expert on TV the other day who said that....

      Talking about Jack Thompson on GP and /. isn't giving him a "platform" anymore than talking about Hitler in history class gives nazism a "platform". This man is attacking our chosen form of entertainment, to ignore him and not talk about his would be counter-productive. 99% of the people reading these stories on GP and /. oppose Jack Thompson's efforts, so shouldn't we be as informed as possible in regards to what he's doing?

      Jack Thompson is not a fool; he might even be unstable; but he fights for something he believes in, and does so pretty well, albeit via use of questionable methods. To belittle him is to belittle the effect he has on free speech issues wrt gaming, and that is a foolish thing to do. If you consider him an enemy, you should analyze his strengths as much as his weakneses.

      Exactly. To ignore Jack Thompson is to allow him to go on spreading his lies to everyone who listens to him...and before you discount those who listen to him as fools who don't matter, take a look at how many bills he has helped to draft. The parents listen to him and the politicians listen to him, and those are the two groups behind the recent wave of legislation and the anti-videogames movement.

      Jack Thompson depends on media support to make his point. If you've ever actually read one of his letters, you would see that it reads like a freaking resume of programs that have had him on and bills that he's helped to draft. If the Florida Bar finds that he has engaged in professional misconduct and that he is an unstable individual incapable of performing his duties as an attorney, then he could probably be stripped of his ability to practice law. Consequently, he would be stripped of his ability to use the media as a tool to his advantage.

      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    9. Re:What a Goof by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      "The media companies that give him an outlet make money off his attention-whoring -- they are acting quite rationally."

      This is only true if you believe that making money by spreading disinformation is a rational act. Most people with morals would disagree.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    10. Re:What a Goof by brkello · · Score: 1

      He has no strengths other than his law license. The only thing he has going for him has nothing to do with anything he has done. It has to do with the older generation demonizing video games. There is always something the older generation just doesn't "get". And this happens to be what it is right now. Mix children with something that the older population hasn't been exposed to and you get an irrational fear. Jack feeds of this fear for his own self glorification.

      I honestly doubt Thompson believes what he is fighting for. If he did, I would think he would research it better so that he could actually debate someone intelligent on the topic. Right now he would be destroyed because most of his "facts" he either makes up or alters the truth to fit his own paradigm. Before he was fighting against lyrics in music...people wouldn't listen to his crap...so he moved on to video games. That's all this is...he isn't doing it for the children...he is doing it for himself. And I find him disgusting because of it.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    11. Re:What a Goof by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The multitude of books is a great evil. There is no limit to this fever for writing; every one must be an author; some out of vanity, to acquire celebrity and raise up a name, others for the sake of mere gain." -- Martin Luther predicts the Internet, ca. 1530

    12. Re:What a Goof by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Give them a break, they're from New Jersey. If I lived there I'd want to scream-o my head off.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    13. Re:What a Goof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could make love to those words, I would.

    14. Re:What a Goof by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      These are media companies led by conservatives. Their morality is "Trap, Dominate, Fuck".

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    15. Re:What a Goof by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed my point -- companies don't have morality. And acting within the moral code of corporate management, the morally correct action is that which maximizes profit without exposing the company to undue risk.

      At any rate, you're conflating rational thought with morality. Morality often entails making irrational actions within the framework for decision-making.

      Note that I'm not supporting this; nor making any kind of judgment about it -- it's just the way that it is.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    16. Re:What a Goof by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If you consider him an enemy, you should analyze his strengths as much as his weakneses. Lawful evil, impervious to rational arguments, gains power from other people's tragedies, +1 against freedom.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    17. Re:What a Goof by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point -- companies don't have morality. And acting within the moral code of corporate management, the morally correct action is that which maximizes profit without exposing the company to undue risk.

      I don't buy that line of bullshit. Companies are run by people, and the 'moral action is the profitable one' is just excusing amoral people for their deeds.

    18. Re:What a Goof by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Jack Thompson is not a fool; he might even be unstable; but he fights for something he believes in, and does so pretty well, albeit via use of questionable methods. To belittle him is to belittle the effect he has on free speech issues wrt gaming, and that is a foolish thing to do. If you consider him an enemy, you should analyze his strengths as much as his weakneses. Most (if not all) of Jack Thompson's cases gets thrown out of court because he consistently fails to follow certain rules and guidelines. He seems like an incompetent lawyer from looking at his history in the courtroom. I wouldn't say he is doing well at all if his goal is to get rid of violence in video games. Furthermore, I think we should belittle him because he lies and is a big asshole to people who stand up to his lies and distortions. Disrespectful people like JT don't deserve respect.
    19. Re:What a Goof by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You're still anthropomorphizing an organization, comprised of a multitude of people who don't all share the same morals, so it breaks down, typically to the level of the lowest morals.

      I chose to not pass judgment (as I'm in agreement with you for the most part), but morality is in large part contextural. I'm pretty sure you're an absolutist, and we'll never see eye-to-eye on that...

      I'll stand by my belief though, that a moral action within its context can be considered amoral by those outside the context, and vice versa. That doesn't keep you or me from believing that others lack morals according to our code.

      Also, I'd like to reiterate that rationality and morality are not the same thing, and bringing morality into the issue just clouds it -- since rationality is, after all, what I was originally talking about.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:What a Goof by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      He has no strengths other than his law license.
      How about:

      Persistence
      The ability to get negative media coverage for his target-of-the-day
      The ability to get coverage of his antics
      His appeal to those in power (also of older generations)
      The ease with which his pet issue can be used as a "save the children" issue.

      Again, by ignoring his strengths, you ignore what he can actually do -- which, unless countered, can have a serious effect on free speech. He's a PR machine for his side of the issue -- and even if he looks bad, the issue still sticks in the mind of voters and politicians both.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    21. Re:What a Goof by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      You Am I is much better...

    22. Re:What a Goof by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      His appeal to those in power (also of older generations) Do you mean his ability to product anti-video game laws? Those were shot down instantly.

      The ease with which his pet issue can be used as a "save the children" issue. In the latest incident with Virgina Tech, the media (other than Fox) was beginning to show that they were tired of that argument, especially when it was discovered that there was minimal involvement with videogames.

      In addition, the neologism "massacre chaser" was created right after this incident as well.

      Again, by ignoring his strengths, you ignore what he can actually do -- which, unless countered, can have a serious effect on free speech. His strengths are easily countered. Each time you see statements, whether it is from him or from other anti-video game "expert", you can have cut-n-paste material:
      - If you see comments where video games cause murder, make your own by stating that the killers are "not guilty by reason of insanity" since they were compelled by the videogames to do so, and that removing their access to video games temporarly (combined with modern medication) will fix whatever insanity they have.
      - If you see comments where 'M' allows minors to play games - simply state that 'M' is 17+, which properly enforced (it is, btw), doesn't bring these games in the hands of minors. In addition, ask whether or not you are willing to show an 'R'-rated or 'NC-17'-rated movie to your child. If so, it's not an issue since the child is mature enough to handle the content. If not, it's not an issue since the child isn't getting the content.
      - If you see simple personal attacks... ignore them. Don't feed the trolls, unless you know how to properly steal the spotlight. (e.g. Stealing the spotlight involved making an attack of your own - for example stating that since he can't win his argument, he violently acts out on his hatred of my ethnicity - while pointing out an exact word/phrase that could be construed as such.)
      - The thing about moving the Wii back-and-forth to simulate a sawing motion? Ask why it took 10 years to think of that argument, when the computer mouse had the same capability. Not that it matters, since there aren't many games (read: zero) that are going to require that situation.
    23. Re:What a Goof by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The media companies that give him an outlet make money off his attention-whoring -- they are acting quite rationally.

      Are they ? Jack Thompson is a raving lunatic. Is helping a raving lunatic gain power for short-term gain rational ? Especially since anti-videogame hysteria could easily turn against other forms of media.

      Besides, I'm not at all certain that basing all decisions on what makes most money makes you sane.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    24. Re:What a Goof by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Lawful evil, impervious to rational arguments, gains power from other people's tragedies, +1 against freedom.

      Chaotic evil. Thompson has shown a disregard for the Constitution and lack of anything approaching personal honor or code of conduct, as well as behaved in a way which has made others doubt his sanity. Being a lawyer doesn't make him lawful; it simply means he knows the legal system.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    25. Re:What a Goof by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately your logic leads you to a path where pretty much anything is moral, all you need to do is find the correct context. That context may only exist in one person's mind.

      Many things are labeled moral or immoral which really are not appropriate to be categorized that way. To some, sex before marriage is immoral. I don't subscribe to listing those kinds of things as moral or immoral. However, attempting to gain by harming others is pretty universally considered morally wrong, just as murder is.

      In the case of the company, its only the top people that decide if the company is acting morally or not. Others working there do not have any control over the larger picture, and in many cases don't even know what their company might be doing.

    26. Re:What a Goof by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Martin Luther is to Jews as Jack Thompson is to videogames.

      I may disagree with Jack Thompson, but I'll support and defend his right to voice his opinions. If his views are more popular (which might have been true at one time, but they seem to have become more marginalized at present) then it is, at least in part, a failing of the opposing side to convincingly present its case.

  2. I find this man to be... by lanceleader · · Score: 1

    .. a complete idiot he tends to jump the gun and blame gaming on everything. Example the Virgina Tech shooting.

    1. Re:I find this man to be... by BrianGKUAC · · Score: 1

      and blame gaming on everything.

      I think we all knew what you meant, but for some reason I just thought this was really funny.

      --
      Menus: Linux=function, Windows=vendor, OS X=as little as possible. Makes a statement, don't you think?
  3. Testing not what you think... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    They're just making it official he's crazy. Heck, I'm a "right-wing nutcase" and I think the guy is off his rocker.

    1. Re:Testing not what you think... by NekoIncardine · · Score: 1

      "Heck, I'm a "right-wing nutcase" and I think the guy is off his rocker."

      Self-contradictory; a real right-wing nutcase would automatically assume him right ignoring all facts to the contrary (given his views are decidedly God-driven and conservative, Billary support notwithstanding). You're what we like to call a "thinking conservative", AKA the ones who can appreciate leftist views even as they believe right-wing views to be better. (Switch 'left' and 'right' and you have a "thinking liberal" - please don't start on calling it an oxymoron).

      --
      Omeg La. Rofl Leh.
    2. Re:Testing not what you think... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Billary? Is that like Caesarpatra?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Testing not what you think... by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      "Heck, I'm a "right-wing nutcase" and I think the guy is off his rocker." Self-contradictory; a real right-wing nutcase would automatically assume [...] You're what we like to call a "thinking conservative" [...] He could even have meant something like what I am: flamingly liberal on most issues, but aware of some of the mistakes that "The Left" makes, and of a few valid points that the conservatives make. Hence, in the view of many of the Liberals I meet, a right-wing nutcase.
      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  4. Paris Hilton by Gertlex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jack is such an attention whore... And we dig it just as much as the rest of the world digs Paris Hilton's everyday antics.

    The two would make a good pair... Thompson and Hilton: The Publicity Whoring Masters

    1. Re:Paris Hilton by MrShaggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      we could even make it a game. Have Thompson and Hilton duking it out, as they both sit in psych wards. Media attention can make you more stars. At the end of it all, we could even have them all doped up at the end. One trying to make the world an ecstasy and coke-loving paradise, the other chasing everyone down, beating them into submission with a large pointer.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Paris Hilton by The13thSin · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's an insult to Paris Hilton.

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    3. Re:Paris Hilton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hot. For a murder simulator.

    4. Re:Paris Hilton by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      The two would make a good pair... Thompson and Hilton: The Publicity Whoring Masters

      Only, I won't download Jack's amateur video.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  5. what? by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 3, Funny

    they want him to undergo psych evaluation and so to prove he's not crazy, he goes and tells the media about it?

    yeah, that sounds like a real good way to prove your sanity there, asshole. For your next trick, i suggest a chicken costume while singing opera and walking around daytona beach. That'll teach 'em to think you're crazy.

    Fuckwit.

    --
    Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    1. Re:what? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think Jack Thompson comes from the "there's no such thing as bad publicity" school of thought.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:what? by Khaed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's not that bright of a person. He's a shifty asshole, but he's not really a smart shifty asshole. If you see the e-mails he sends out, it's very apparent that he's just... sort of a stupid guy.

      I haven't believed that Jack Thompson cares much about the things he argues for in a while. I think he's just got very, very serious problems and gets off on the attention. He's like a real life, professional troll. He enjoys stirring up shit, and being in front of the camera. He likes that gamers are pissed at him. But if it wasn't gamers, it would be someone else.

      By revealing this publicly, he not only gets attention, but a new round of shit storm with gamers on the web. People will post this and make fun of him and he'll jot off angry e-mails.

    3. Re:what? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "He's like a real life, professional troll. He enjoys stirring up shit, and being in front of the camera"

      Is Paris Hilton his soulmate then?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  6. Been done before by orclevegam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's actually been ordered to take Psych test before and he managed to pass them. The guy is a moron, but unfortunatly he's not clinically insane. What will happen this time is probably the same thing that happened last time. He'll go do the test, pass it (although probably give the psychologist giving the test some interesting data to work on), and then make a huge PR event out of the fact that he's legally sane. He's got a few screws loose, but he's not missing any of them so they can't actually diagnose him with anything. They need to just disbar the guy and have done with it.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only they'd disbar all the lawyers...

    2. Re:Been done before by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, according to this link, he's presently not allowed to practice law in Florida. One state down, 49 to go!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    3. Re:Been done before by Darth · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are incorrect. This is his actual entry on the florida bar member search page :

      http://www.floridabar.org/names.nsf/All/07D0790038 98F95585256A830051348B?OpenDocument

      as you can see, he is still eligible to practice law in florida.

      (if he weren't, there would be no need to give him a 90 day suspension)

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    4. Re:Been done before by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Look at the page I gave. I'd highly recommend looking at the large blue "N" next to his name. Look at the bottom legend. Still so sure?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    5. Re:Been done before by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. The "jack e thompson" listed on that page is not eligible to practice law in Florida because he is dead. The Jack Thompson that hates videogames is not only quite alive but is legally named John Bruce Thompson. John Bruce Thompson is still eligible to practice law in Florida.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    6. Re:Been done before by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      According to one of the comments on the gamepolitics thread the earlier psychological test that Thompson took was for a possible obsession with sex. I've not heard that before and the commenter doesn't provide any source so who knows how true it is.

      However, if he is given a fuller test this time I wouldn't be surprised if he gets diagnosed with some anger management issues as well as some things like paranoia, a persecution complex as well as delusions of grandeur.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    7. Re:Been done before by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1

      He'll go do the test, pass it (although probably give the psychologist giving the test some interesting data to work on), and then make a huge PR event out of the fact that he's legally sane.

      If someone feels the need to hold a press conference just to announce that they're legally sane, you know everything you need to know about their sanity.

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    8. Re:Been done before by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      According to one of the comments on the gamepolitics thread the earlier psychological test that Thompson took was for a possible obsession with sex. I've not heard that before and the commenter doesn't provide any source so who knows how true it is.

      The previous test was stemming from his harassment of Janet Reno who he was accusing of being a lesbian.

      From the wikipedia page (which also sites the source as an article in Insight):

      In 1990, after his election loss, Thompson began a campaign against the efforts of Switchboard of Miami, a social services group of which Reno was a board member. Thompson charged that the group placed "homosexual-education tapes" in public schools. Switchboard responded by getting the Florida Supreme Court to order that he submit to a psychiatric examination. Thompson did so and passed, and since then has stated on more than one occasion that he is "the only officially certified sane lawyer in the entire state of Florida."

      And the url for the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_%28atto rney%29#Campaign_against_Janet_Reno

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    9. Re:Been done before by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Well said, and I stand corrected! Thanks for the heads-up!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    10. Re:Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack passed the psych exam last time because the examiner wrote his insanity off as a "Christian" desire to set everyone morally straight. (I can't believe a psych would actually argue that; are they saying that Christianity and Insanity are virtually interchangeable?) If I'm not mistaken, the examiner was also a friend of the family.

      Any objective evaluation of this man would show deep psychological problems. He really believes that the game industry and everyone who takes their side are part of a vast conspiracy against him (and The Children(TM), but mostly him). How could anyone ignore that kind of disconnect from reality?

    11. Re:Been done before by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be so awesome if a judge told Jack Thompson that he couldn't practice law in Florida due to being dead.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  7. Cranks are good copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interested parties should produce a dossier detailing his antics and distribute it as a press pack.

    captcha: warfare

  8. Eh, this is going nowhere fast by Steeltalon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Psychological examination probably won't prove anything and his mental acuity isn't even really the thing that seems to cause problems. It is his professional demeanor or lack of therin. His conduct is unacceptable and his disbarment should be based on that. I'm sure that they're just hoping that he fails in order to give them "solid" justification to get rid of him.

    --
    Regards, Ian
    1. Re:Eh, this is going nowhere fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >or lack of therin
      So, do you think therin replacement therapy would help?

  9. Jack Thompson crazy? by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

    Someone thinks that Jack Thompson might not be playing with a full deck?
    Dear God! Hell must have frozen over solid!

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  10. That makes sense. by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Funny

    And we dig it just as much as the rest of the world digs Paris Hilton's everyday antics.

    Really? I thought that Paris Hilton got so much attention was because there were people who actually liked her.
    That argument actually makes a lot more sense than the impression I had.

    I don't know. I've never been able to understand celebrity worship.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:That makes sense. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I've never been able to understand celebrity worship. Well, on one level I don't understand celebrity worship, but really, I think almost everybody has their celebrities. For most/many/some slashdotters they may not be actors, but it could be Joss Whedon, Linus Torvalds, Theo de Raadt, ESR, Richard Stallman, and even--as the GP mentioned--Thompson. Same kind of celebrity tracking, just a different kind of celebrity! (I'm think of names I see fairly regularly on slashdot..)
    2. Re:That makes sense. by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, on one level I don't understand celebrity worship, but really, I think almost everybody has their celebrities. For most/many/some slashdotters they may not be actors, but it could be Joss Whedon, Linus Torvalds, Theo de Raadt, ESR, Richard Stallman, and even--as the GP mentioned--Thompson. Same kind of celebrity tracking, just a different kind of celebrity! (I'm think of names I see fairly regularly on slashdot..)

      Well, yeah, I care about their newsworthy actions because they are usually doing something that affects my life (or at least the products I buy and use).

      But I don't care about their marriages, their divorces, their kids (adopted or not), the cars they drive, the clothes they wear, the houses the live in, the vacations they take, or any of the rest of that stuff that shows up in the tabloids, in the entertainment section of the news, or in People magazine. As far as I'm concerned, the entertainment section of any cable news half hour is just 5 minutes of important news about the world events and political decisions that affect our lives that's not getting covered.

      I mean, I care about what movies Brad Pitt's gonna star in 'cause he's one of my favorite actors, but I'd really rather be punched in the face than hear the term "Brangelina" EVER again in my life. That's the sort of nonsense I just don't understand. People who pin their hopes and dreams on mundane details of the daily lives of people they'll never personally know disappoint me.

      Of course, I'm almost certainly preaching to the choir here on Slashdot.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    3. Re:That makes sense. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm almost certainly preaching to the choir here on Slashdot.

      Yes. Yes you are.

      [...] I'd really rather be punched in the face than hear the term "Brangelina" EVER again in my life.

      I know a guy what can help with that...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:That makes sense. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Wait! I said Brangelina! I said Brangelina! Oh! I've said Brangelina again!

    5. Re:That makes sense. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      mean, I care about what movies Brad Pitt's gonna star in 'cause he's one of my favorite actors, but I'd really rather be punched in the face than hear the term "Brangelina" EVER again in my life. That's the sort of nonsense I just don't understand. People who pin their hopes and dreams on mundane details of the daily lives of people they'll never personally know disappoint me.

      Pin their hopes and dreams ? I think you're mistaken. Those people consider Mr. Pitt's everyday life the same as you consider his movies: entertainment.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:That makes sense. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Exclusive nude beach celebrity photos of Richard Stallman!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  11. Better get studing... by Tatisimo · · Score: 1

    Just like a person who knows nothing about math or science can pass the test if they study hard enough, I believe he can pass those tests... if he gets his homework done and studies hard. As long as he's declared over 60% sane it'll be fine and he'll go on living the same...

    --
    Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
    1. Re:Better get studing... by Tatisimo · · Score: 1

      I'd like to take that last comment and stick it right in front of my eyes... I better get studying my writing to learn at least how to spell words such as "studying". And over use of the three periods seems a problem for me also...

      --
      Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
  12. It all depends: by Cadallin · · Score: 5, Informative
    I have some knowledge about State Bar Association Ethics Boards, from first hand accounts. It all depends on what they want to know. In the case I know about, the guy being investigated got to pick two doctors, the Board one. His Doctor's testified that he "was not a threat to himself or others" which is doctor-speak for "I couldn't justify to a judge having him involuntarily committed." It doesn't mean any more than that. Fortunately the Ethics board was well aware of that. When asked if they believed he would do the things things that prompted the inquiry again, they admitted it was possible (in the usual non-committal sort of way, but lawyers, unlike juries, understand what that stuff means). The Board's Doctor said the same things in a more formal kind of way. The Board recommended in their report to the State Supreme Court, that he not have his license ever reinstated (he had already been suspended from practicing law due to his actions).

    It really depends on the Board. I think its very possible, given his previous history of warnings in the Florida legal system, that Thompson is about to get slapped pretty hard. They aren't happy with him already. As I said, he's received a number of warnings, and has been removed from cases by judges for his behavior.

    1. Re:It all depends: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy being investigated got to pick two doctors, the Board one.

      There are 10 types of people in this world...

  13. Yeah, Thompson's just a jerk. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I think you're probably right. The broad umbrella of "antisocial tendencies" notwithstanding, being a complete, stubborn jerk isn't exactly a form of mental illness yet. Thompson's not a narcissist or a megalomaniac or a sociopath or anything like that -- he's just incredibly rude and disrespectful to people that don't see things his way, and he knows that his campaign to restrict access to violent games to minors requires a certain amount of grandstanding to rally supporters of the same goals.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  14. Qualified Sanity by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    and then make a huge PR event out of the fact that he's legally sane.
    It makes one wonder why he'd rather be declared legally sane instead of just being regarded as sane for behaving in a sane manner. Do you know what passes under the law as still being legally sane compared to what the general populace thinks of as sanity? I mean, look at Jack Thompson!
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  15. His second psyche request by grapeape · · Score: 1

    He was also asked to do this by the Bar in the past. The result of that one was Jack suing the bar and settling. I think the guy is off his rocker but until I see he is actually disbarred its just another attempt at keeping his name in the headlines.

  16. If not disorder by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    If his behavior won't be somehow framed as some form of psychological disorder, how would a psychologist, based on everything he's said and done, describe Mr. Thompson?

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  17. Hmmm by Richard+McBeef · · Score: 1

    For a second, I thought this would be an article about a Law & Order episode.

  18. Does he have to be nuts to be disbarred? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why the psychiatric angle at all? Can't he be barred for "Extremely unprofessional behavior not appropriate of a member of the bar" or something along those lines?

    It does still say he's a "member in good standing" though, I wonder if you can be a member in poor standard or the alternative is to just be disbarred?

    1. Re:Does he have to be nuts to be disbarred? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      To flip him over the edge. Get him ranting and raving about having to take yet another (apparently it's not the first) psych exam and generally make an ass of himself right before the real hearing, where they disbar him for "unprofessional behavior" or whatever they can.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Does he have to be nuts to be disbarred? by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately in this case, Lawyers have one of the best Unions in the Country (Another being the American Medical Association). It is very hard to get a lawyer disbarred. They basically have to make themselves a big enough embarrassment to other lawyers that they complain (Running around pissing off Judges is a very good way though, and Thompson's done plenty of that). Suffice it to say that Lawyers are very cliqueish and tend to protect their own right up to the point where it becomes a huge public fiasco. This is why, although many, many of them do some pretty disgusting things, and behave in horribly inappropriate ways, it is very, very rare for any one to get disbarred. It's only when the general legal community starts gagging that they do something, and they hear about societies worst every day, it's pretty hard to gross out a seasoned Criminal Lawyer.

    3. Re:Does he have to be nuts to be disbarred? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you can be a member in poor standard or the alternative is to just be disbarred?

      Either you are a "member in good standing" and can legally practice law, or you you aren't. "Member in good standing" == "Not Disbarred", or perhaps even "Not Disbarred, YET".

      It's funny how Jack Thompson has at times tried to use the phrase "member in good standing" as some amazing proof of his legitimacy. It would be almost like someone saying "I have *not* been locked in prison", and playing it like some badge of honor and certification of legitimacy. A lawyer that even has to mention he is a "member in good standing" is a red flag, just like someone mentioning that they are not in prison would be a red flag.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  19. Legal translation by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    The recommendation comes following issues stemming from Thompson's Bully case last year where there were issues regarding his professional conduct.

    Translation: "The recommendation comes following issues stemming from Thompson's Bully case last year where there were issues regarding his inability to refrain from ranting like a raving lunatic and exposing his genitalia to the courtroom while prancing around like a chicken with jock itch."

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  20. They're just being thorough, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, the Florida bar is just trying to cover its ass on this one. Think about it.

    If Jack Thompson gets disbarred without any psych evaluation, and then he winds up being diagnosed with a real psychological disorder (don't know where "Jack Thompson crazy" would be in the DSM, but it might be in there somewhere), then Thompson could have a case for readmission to the bar-- once he has been treated. He might even be able to sue the bar for failing to recommend him to a psychologist before disbarring him: given the outrageous and outlandish nature of his actions, he could argue that it should have been OBVIOUS that he was, in layman's terms, a fucking lunatic.

    Meanwhile, if he IS found to be nuts by a psychologist, then the Florida bar can simply suspend his license until such time as his doctor says that his problem is under control (and no doctor is likely to do that-- consider the liability issues!). Boom, the JT problem is solved.

    Of course, one has to consider the possibility that his psych evaluation comes back indicating that there ISN'T anything clinically wrong with him. In that case, JT's actions, which are pretty frickin' crazy, are no longer ascribable to mental problems-- which means that he knew how wrong his actions were, and went through with them anyway. Boom, he's disbarred for his unprofessional behavior, and the clean psych evaluations will make it hard for him to come back later for readmission.

    The military does a lot of this stuff, too. I know a few guys who have been kicked out for various reasons. Every one of them has been required to undergo a physical and psychological evaluation before they get booted-- that way, they can't come back and make claims under the ADA and similar laws. It's standard, cover-your-ass procedure for large organizations-- not an indication that the Florida bar thinks that Thompson is clinically nuts.

  21. hahahaha by mstahl · · Score: 1

    I love it. This article is both tagged "haha" AND "hahahaha", 'cause only one of those wouldn't be quite enough.

    1. Re:hahahaha by GammaKitsune · · Score: 1

      I assumed it was supposed to be some sort of Cartman laugh thing.

      --
      Gamertag: WyleType