Microsoft Acknowledges 360 Issues, Extends Warranty to 3 Years
RamblinLonghorn writes "Microsoft has announced that they are extending the warranty for all Xbox 360s to 3 years. This appears to be entirely retroactive and that 'those who have already paid for such repair charges can expect reimbursement checks for the amount of their console repair.' It seems as though Microsoft is accepting the blame for the hardware malfunctions, but it is worth noting that this warranty modification only applies in the 'Red Rings of Death' situation."
They actually admitted to anything that was considered wrong from their part?
love the taste, hate the texture
I'd like a 360. I really would. There are games I'd like to play (PGR3, Dead Rising, some others), as well as games coming out I'd like to play (Rock Band and many others). But I keep hearing about failures. I know people who are on at least their 3rd 360. I've seen the estimations recently putting the failure rates as high as ~30% (which, even if is off by 5x is quite high). If you combine that with the noise the things make, I'm hesitant to buy one. I keep waiting for a re-spin of the silicon (moving to a smaller process should help with the heat/noise issues).
The Elite might have got me but instead of pushing the models down, they just put the Elite on top with a new higher price point.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
...and for those of us who have no idea wtf the "red rings of death are", see here
(Posted anonymously to avoid karma whoring)
I'm not normally a fan of MS, nor do I own a 360, but this is a great move by Microsoft - and not something they NEEDED to do. They could have just fixed the problems and made it a year or so but by extending this to a three year warranty (retroactive) they are going to save a lot of people money.
Companies like GameStop who sell extended warranties though might not be happy since I certainly wouldn't buy one now that MS is backing their system up for 3 years.
It's not surprising. What is it with all the new consoles having so many hardware problems? Oh yeah... the bling $$$ bling.
Heh. My NES / SNES still work fine ~15 years later. Hell, even my SMS is fine!
Assuming they just do full replace and junk, and pay full retail price, that is >2.5 MILLION failed X-Boxes in the next 2 years. Assuming each repair costs Microsoft only $200, they are budgeting for 5 MILLION failed x-boxen!
With only 11 million X-boxen shipped, that 33% failure rate is sounding like an UNDERCOUNT!
Test your net with Netalyzr
Perhaps offtopic, but...
They don't appear to repair 360s. I had a DVD drive failure and I got back a new console in just a couple days. Being in MN and sending it to Texas, there is no way they even had time to look at it to see what the problem was, they just send out a new one as soon a one comes in. Although I was very happy there was so little down time, I can't help but wonder why they would shell out a new console for what is likely a $15 repair. Even with labor, costs can't be that high. In my experience, disk drives don't seem to last much more than 3 years, if they are paying for a new console for every drive that fails in three years time, they are going to lose alot of money.
They dont shell out a new console, they ship you a refurbed unit.
Give them a CC# and they'll cross ship (send your refurbed unit out right now, before they recieve your return).
Then they fix yours, and put it in the pool to be sent to someone else.
It's how RMA's work.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
Are you nuts? You have three choices, nintendo, which is completely different to the others, so the choice is gonna be on other things than reliability (I don't care how stable it is if it isn't fun for me, no purpose), xbox, which isn't good for reliability (not bad either though) is the midrange console, possibly even the safe option and when something does go wrong they are prompt to take it back and fix it, and finally the sony PS3, which isnt known for reliability either, and again is quite a large step up. With those big a differences, I don't think reliability should be an issue in you buying a console, as reliability still is good in all of them, even if it varies a little we're talking about small degrees. Secondly if you claim reliability is most important cos what's the use if it doesn't work- things get fixed, on the whole quite well, and what's the point of a console if it doesn't do what I want it to do in the first place, reliably useless is still useless.
Eveything breaks... its a fact of life, from the space shuttle to the keyboard you typed your comment on... it all will eventually break. While the 360 did and may still continue to have quality control issues, its how the company handles the situation from that point thats importand, and recently MS have really impressed me with the way the handle most of the issues (with a few noted exceptions which any large company will have). Although they tried to supress the fact that they were having issues, they have now admited it, and in good faith. They extended the warranty to show good faith, not because they were obligated to, or had to.... infact many companys have problematic products still on shelves and refuse to service or extend the warranty once the issue becomes known... Just be glad you can get it fixed is what im trying to say here....
Hand some people free apples (free extended warranty), and they'll complain they havent been cored and seeded yet....
Noone writes jokes in base 13!
The 360 in my apt has 4 lights lit. It used to be 3, but it's since decided to light the 4th after I attempted the towel trick to fix it (the towel trick worked once, but the second time, it didn't work at all, and shortly after that, the 4th LED lit).
We'll have to call MS when I get home to see if that's covered.
with any luck, they'll cover it and we wont' have to shell out 150$
...spike
Ewwwwww, coconut...
Its amazing when any big company willingly does something like this (without a class action, intense media coverage, etc). What is more amazing is its microsoft doing it. Guess they figure they can't afford to look bad at any level in such a high heat console war.
Regardless of your opinion of Microsoft, they have continually impressed me with their willingness (eventual) to own up to issues with the console and extend the warranty retro-actively. I just can't see Sony doing the same thing in this situation. I feel good knowing that if I get the red rings of death (my friend already had one bout with it), that they will pay for it since my console will still be good for several more years now.
"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
And yet it still outsells its market competitor
> You have three choices, nintendo ... xbox ... and finally the sony PS3,
You forgot one. There is the PS2 as well. It's a decent, fun system and you can still buy games for it. It's not to be totally ignored just yet.
I'll probably be modded down for this...
Indeed. Im sure Microsoft would have quite a bigger market share if it wasn't for the hardware issues. I know I personally really want to play current and upcoming 360 games, but I hate dealing with customer services and repairs with a passion, so I'm not touching one until its semi-reliable. I doubt I'm the only one thinking that way.
I'm not saying that 3year warranty would be a bad thing, but seriously... Has there been any *good* on this year (or two) long episode. M$ should have acted a long time ago, and what they did was only unevitable since 360 users had been driven to point M$ was close to be massively sued..
It would appear from the size of this charge to earnings ($1billion+) that the XBox reliability is considerably worse than average. Microsoft even called it "an unacceptable number of repairs to Xbox 360 consoles," marketing-speak for "Houston, we have a problem."
"Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
Microsoft officially apologizing for Vista and offering XP licenses to those unhappy with it. Meanwhile, they work on a new OS that will actually run on modern hardware.
Quality control / reliability is the issue. How they handle it is at best damage control. The most they can hope for is people thinking "They really screwed the pooch there, but at least they agreed to adopt the puppies." As for stepping up with the warranty did they really step up or is this a preemptive step to avoid a large (and expensive) class action lawsuit.
"Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
I know I'm feeding a troll, but I'm bored, so here you go.
If by your logic, sales equals how the "gaming world" feels about the Xbox 360, what does this say about the PS3? Can you give less than a shit about something? In the last available figures (May 07), NPD has Xbox outselling PS3 by 2 to 1; the Wii outsells it by 4 to 1. This is NPD by the way; A non-biased, market research group.
The only specific PS3 failure I've read about is where some guy put tape over the vent holes to "keep dust out."
Not that they don't happen, the widely quoted figures I've seen, Wii and PS3 failure rate was about 1%, compared to 30% for the 360.
First one died within 8 hours of purchase, RRoD. 2nd one died 8 months later RRoD, 3rd one died 6 months after that, cd drive crapped out.
Best Buy covered all 3 death's but the third one required me to blow 60 bucks on a new "Protection Racket".
So I'm covered for any more RRod's for 2 more years.. and my "Protection Racket" will cover me for at least one more dvd drive failure.
I refuse to spend any more on this system, so my only question left is how many more I'll have die on me before I'm out of freebies.
Using their financial numbers as to the cost of extending the warranty to 3 years, MS themselves anticipates a full 3.8 million COMPLETE NEW replacement Xbox 360's to have to send out. That gives you an idea as to the failure rate they are seeing. This is at the current FULL RETAIL cost of the system and not using only repair costs. If it only costs $100 to repair, that would mean an anticipated 11.5 million failures during the 3 year warranty period.
We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
Ok Gamasutra reporting the NPD numbers for May
May's NPD tally comes to 338,000 Wii, 155,000 Xbox, and 82,000 PS3.
Nope, its not outselling the wii. It has a higher marketshare due to a year more on shelves, but at this rate it'll be gone by years end.
I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
MS have really impressed me with the way the handle most of the issues (with a few noted exceptions which any large company will have). Although they tried to supress the fact that they were having issues, they have now admited it, and in good faith. They extended the warranty to show good faith, not because they were obligated to, or had to....
If they initially lied about the issue and worked to cover it up, then *nothing* they subsequently do can be considered "in good faith".
They tried to scam people, got caught over a massive design failure, and are now doing damage control.
Good faith would have been noticing the issue first and working to ameliorate the damage they caused.
Going into damage control mode after being caught lying is not in any way "good faith".
It's amazing the shit people will willingly lap up these days. Truly bizarre.
The most amazing thing to me is that according to these figures the PlayStation 2 sold 188,000 units during May So the old gen PlayStation outsells the nextgen Xbox 360 and the PS3.
Top selling hardware for may is:
DS 423,000
Wii 338,000
PSP 221,000
PS2 188,000
Xbox 155,000
PS3 82,000
GBA 80,000
Even funnier. Handhelds are more popular then the big nextgen wonders.
I think using a domestic vacuum cleaner on electronics is a bad idea, I've heard they generate a bit of static electricity...
Point taken. I think the PS2 outselling the PS3 is still the greatest evidence that Sony priced themselves out of competition.
You're right of course, I just pit Sony and Microsoft against each other because that's what this particular AC is thinking about.
The PS3 is selling at a rate that is right between the first Playstation and PS2..
That would be fine and dandy, if the market was a static, fixed, number of customers. 82,000 units in a month in todays market stinks. I agree with you that the PS3 is a marvelous piece of technology. The games look beautiful, and a few of them are probably pretty fun. It may even catch on and get back into competitiveness, but in my opinion, based on the NPD numbers and daily press stories, I wouldn't bet on it.
All the games people are going out to buy for the PS2 will run on their PS3s, all the franchises they are buying at a faster rate than the 360 are getting next gen sequels on the PS3. Developers who seven to eight years ago started working on PS2 engines are still being able to leverage that technology they created years ago in the giant and still expanding PS2 market.
Which means they (consumers and developers) will not be spending their money on PS3 related products. Just by looking at the wii versus gamecube, you can see an advantage in not having two product lines in the same market. The Wii is near enough in price to the Gamecube, that it is easy to justify shelling out the extra $150 or so to get the wii. Developers, who shunned the wii for the most part, now see the success of the Wii (in large part due to pricing and timing) and are scrambling to divert money to wii related projects. Unless you expect the ps2 to be there in another 7 years, and the NPD numbers show the PS2 under 200,000 for the first time since initial launch, you have to get the consumers and developers on the newer technology.
I'm so glad I didn't buy that warranty extension.
I wonder how those that paid 150 bucks for the extended warranty from different companies feel about this?
I work for a high tech company that makes expensive hardware, far pricier than the xbox, and I've come to understand a lot more about the cost of warranties from the supplier end. Extending warranties is essentially a loss for the the manufacturer - you're essentially betting when what you made will fail. That's weighed against the cost of making more durable components and the cost that a customer would not buy your product in the first place.
When the 360 first came out, someone made a decision that beyond one year it would cost the company too much to repair the consoles relative to the increased sales than would be had by having a longer warranty. They also had to take into account the bad publicity that could (and did) occur.
I'll be pure engineer here - someone at Microsoft redid the formula, given the knowledge of failures that have happened since release. This time around, the math said that enough future sales would be lost to outweigh the cost of extending the warranty. It's really that simple. It's also interesting to note here that they didn't make it a lifetime warranty (20 years or something). They probably ran that formula too, and decided that the math tips the other way if you let it last forever.
So did they NEED to do this? If by need you mean "saving face", then no. Being the retrospective hero doesn't help anything, only in the sense that it might affect future sales.
Because of DRM issues they stopped doing that a while ago. Now they make an effort to return your repaired box to you. If it's broken beyond repair, only then do you get a refurb.
Is there any information about customers who have purchased an extended warranty from MS? (as I did after a RRoD prompted a replacement, and my 1 year retroactive warranty was about to expire) Any guesses as if that part of the "repair costs" that they indicated would be refundable?
The fact that the 360 is number 1 in North America must burn your anonymous bunghole something fierce, since it prompts you to post silly flames over and over. Sorry dude.
Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
I've recently had problems with the USB ports on my PS3, but Sony won't touch it for free since I no longer have my receipt (nevermind that it's impossible for the warranty to have expired by now; I guess the policy saves them some money). So with Microsoft retroactively extending the warranty like this, what happens to those people who voided their warranty, thinking that it was expired?
To be honest, I'm somehow certain that this has far less to do with any possible class action lawsuit, and far more to do with the potential for disgruntled gamers jumping ship to Sony. That, I believe, is what would make Microsoft stay awake at night. They didn't do much of anything until gamers started posting online, "F@$# it! I'm getting a PS3!"
And that matches Microsoft's past behavior in every market that they eventually come to dominate. They don't act upon problems until there are customer rumblings of using alternatives.
IF any other manufacturer had a defect rate of 30% (slightly above that according to the largest game retailer there is, being EB) mostly due to heating dissipation design and were getting as many complaints as they were I don't see any other choice. The press has gotten really bad in the last month or so on this issue.
Had they not made this press release, it would have probably adversely affected sales.
Hmmm... Pie...
Bravo to a good business decision.
Someone has run the numbers of the amount of money they are losing due to poor rep and compared it to the cost of extending the warrenty period. They clearly found that extending the warrenty would
* make people feel more comfortable about their purchase.
* keep some more people with an xbox to buy games.
They aren't doing this because xboxes are failing left right and center. They are doing it because their failure rate is low enough that they know it won't send them broke.
3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
I got my 360 shortly after its initial release, and I put a lot of hours on it (especially in the first year -- not so much this year); for the years that I had it, it was rock solid, and I think it's been a great console. As it turns out, it finally died a month ago and I was disappointed to find that it was out of warranty... Until now. This warranty extension will mean a lot to me, and I am very grateful to MS for having put it in action. Thanks, guys!
That's not necessarily true. As I recall, the PowerMac G5 has case fans all over the damn place, but they all run very slowly. It's been a few years since I've opened one of those things up, but that's what I remember from the ones I used to work with. Now, the PowerMac G5 does get ridiculously loud when you pop open the panel... must be a sensor there or something.
"16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
This is exactly what Microsoft wants to hear right now
vi +
Not sure why you got modded flamebait. It's true. Extending the warranty is not enough. Actually, they don't need to extend the warranty, they need to fix the hardware so it doesn't break anymore. I don't want to pay for an Xbox replacement in one year, and I don't want to pay in three years, and I don't want to pay in five years, and I still want to use my Xbox in 10 years when I can't pay even if I want to.
For heaven's sake, my VCS 2600 still works as well as the day it came out the box. I have a Pong, and it still works as well as the day it came out. And I still hook them up from time to time! There's no reason why all these 360s should die so easily, and if I want to play a little Crackdown 10 years from now, I should be able to.
I'm astonished to read so many "mine is okay, except a game doesn't work" or "no problem so far, only a broken dvd drive" comments. Don't be so forgiving! This is a game console, not a PC. There's no reason why it should break within such a short timespan! I've bought dozens of consoles, and all of them still work. Some of them are over 20 years old!
For heaven's sake, my VCS 2600 still works as well as the day it came out the box. I have a Pong, and it still works as well as the day it came out. And I still hook them up from time to time! There's no reason why all these 360s should die so easily, and if I want to play a little Crackdown 10 years from now, I should be able to.
Don't worry, there will be a 20%-30% chance the Xbox 720 will be Backwards compatible with it and Microsoft will replace it as often as you like for a certain period. And then it's a brick.
I think it's somewhat unrealistic to expect hardware to last forever but 30% fail rate is ridiculous.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
*dusting off the account* Actually, this 360 owner was a PS2/GC fanboy and XBox disser readying himself for a PS3 when suddenly... 599 US DOLLARS! One CompUSA going out of business sale later, and I got a 360 for less than half that. So much for my Playstation loyalty. I wouldn't be surprised if I'm not the only ex-PS2 fan in this boat either. Still want to get a Wii too. Just a matter of hitting Target at the right time to find one...
Developers who seven to eight years ago started working on PS2 engines are still being able to leverage that technology they created years ago in the giant and still expanding PS2 market. That's all fine and dandy, but what about the PS3 market? Sony has made it clear that manufacturing prices for the PS3 are on target to reach break even at the one year point just like they did with the PS2. That's all fine and dandy too, but when will the PS3 take the 40%+ markdown so that it can actually start to compete with its lower-priced competitors? The PS3 is selling at a rate that is right between the first Playstation and PS2. That's all fine and dandy as well (if true), but that was when the Dreamcast was imploding and Nintendo was fumbling with the Gamecube. This is now where the 360 is an established competitor, the Wii is blowing everyone away, and handhelds are more of a market presence. The relevant question: Was the PS2 as far behind the PS1 in sales eight months in, as the PS3 is behind the PS2 now? Sorry, but trying to spin the amazing PS2 sales as anything but extraordinarily positive for Sony is just silly. "Extraordinarily positive?" Their last-gen system is still outselling their next-gen system, while the other two next-gen systems are also beating said next-gen's shiny black exhaust port. Yeah, Sony's still making cash on the PS2, but that system's into the fourth quarter and there ain't no overtime in this game. If you think Sony's situation is "extraordinarily positive", the Bush Administration has a PR job waiting for you in Iraq.
http://www.megagames.com/news/html/console/microso ftconfessandfixrrodepidemic.shtml has gone all the way to say:
[quote]Some people would believe that Microsoft have just discovered the issue and fixed it, as expected from a reputable multinational company. But when asked, Robbie Bach, president of Microsoft's Entertainment & Devices Division for a "little over first year" the "set of issues wasn't visible at all," but during the last couple of months the company has seen "significant increases, significant call volume, and significant attention" to the problem. During those "couple of months" Microsoft actively denied the problem several times. [/quote]
Is it too much to ask for a $499 console to stay functional during an entire console cycle when subjected to reasonable use?
I'm actually fairly impressed that MS have finally decided to be mature about this problem and put a damage control system in place. Surely with their acceptance that they have a QA problem they will seriously invest in a solution to the ongoing hardware problems a select group of users have encountered. Thus far (touch wood) I've had no issues other than the occasional crash with my launch day 360! Thankfully this extended warranty period now gives me some piece of mind that I'm covered in the event of something going wrong.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
The formulas used to calculate warranties are meant to cover manufacturing errors. Every once in a while, a defective unit will get past quality control in the factory due to human error. The warranty is designed to protect customers if they get one of these units.
The "Red Ring of Death" is likely from a design flaw, not a manufacturing error. A manufacturing error would not account for the abnormal failure rate. It is literally built into every unit that leaves the factory. The only long-term solution to a design flaw is a product recall.
Extending the warranty is just a temporary solution because Xbox 360s will continue get the "Red Ring of Death".
Actually, it's more likely that they'll get out of the console business entirely, or have fucked up backwards compatibilitity like the 360's.
I think it's somewhat unrealistic to expect hardware to last forever but 30% fail rate is ridiculous.I don't expect it to last forever. I just expect it to last longer than a few years.
I bet thats only because lots of geeks buy two, and that MS dumps 100000s in landfill because they are unrepairable. (at least the dead MBs)
11m sold, but I bet at least 3m are dead, 5m seconds.
Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
11m xbox360s, make X heat every day = billions of tonnes of C02. Evil MS!!!
Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
Don't think you deserve "flamebait". I would not like the annoyance of sending my console away for repair either (once inconveniently acceptable but more then that no way). Of course any mechanical device will eventually fail as will any electronic device although this will normally take longer.
Taking game controllers for example. I have always been impressed with Nintendo (SNES, N64 and Gamecube), Sega and even Sony controllers since I would expect a life of no more than a few hundred hours but all of the controllers I own still work well after years of use. I have found that I prefer to pay for the genuine controller even though it is more expensive since all my third party controllers failed after about 50 hours of use. The exception being my wireless dual shock from Logitech (excellent product which works well on my PS3). I can't comment on the reliability of the Microsoft controllers although I do have a wireless Microsoft mouse that I find very reliable.
All Manufacturer's when they make a product allow for approx less than 1% (usually a lot less) failure in the first year and hopefully less then 10% over 5 years although this does depend on the product. If any company wants the customer to purchase their products then those products must be seen as reliable hence they invest in quality control and use statistical analysis to extrapolate reliability since failures must be taken into account when setting the price of a product. This is standard business practice and even a 2% to 3% failure rate over a year is unacceptable.
It appears that Microsoft has not even taken into account Manufacturing reliability testing 101 and IMHO have appeared to treat their console the same way they treat their software, however having a failure rate of over 10% is ridiculous (over 30% is insane) no company except Microsoft could afford this type of failure rate, in fact a failure of this scale would drive most companies out of business. One billion dollar my be small change to Microsoft but it is still a considerable amount of money that must leave many share holders fuming.
Granted that Microsoft is now offering a three year warranty although I am not sure if this is on the full Xbox360 package but it is very annoying if you keep having to send your machine in for repair or swap. Eventually you are going to loose customer confidence and they will go elsewhere.
I realise that this may seem strange to some but many customers' do want reliable products and are willing to pay for them. An extended warranty is peace of mind but only if a product is perceived as reliable in the first place. When you are still paying a reasonable sum of money for an Xbox360 you would like it to last more than three years. On a PC a three year lifetime may be acceptable but on a console it is not.
There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
Many people are really missing the bigger point here. This is like Hyundai offering a 10 year warranty on their cars. They are basically saying that the product you are buying is poorly designed/built and will fail.
Some people mistakingly think that Hyundia is offering a great deal without considering the cost of this arrangement. Sure, they fix whats broke, but what about the cost of getting it fixed, such as the day of vacation you had to burn when your car died, the tow truck to get your car to the garage, the time/hassle of arranging the service, the cost of the rental car you had to get while your car was in the shop for a week.
Add up all of these "hidden costs", and you could have just gone out and purchased a superior product in the first place.
These hidden costs are in this "great deal" from MS. What about the time you spend reporting the problem, unhooking and packaging it, the gas/time taking it to the post office. What about the 2-4 weeks you are without the 360, not only can you not play games, but you can't play movies or stream music.
Remember that cost includes a lot more than the price you initially paid, the most important of which is your ability to use the product.
//TODO: Insert catchy phrase
This is a huge turnaround for Microsoft, and what many people were waiting for (this, and evidence that they've actually solved the problem) to purchase a 360.
However, are we now going to get the much desired retraction from all the 360 fanboys who's anecdotal evidence "proved" that this problem wasn't widespread, or are we going to have to be satisfied with the usual semi-collective "I told you so"?
Microsoft is claiming this is going to cost them over a billion (1.15) dollars. If you assume that 300 mil is used for administrative fees, and you divide by the approximate manufacturing costs of the unit, you get something like 2.66 million 360s that they're planning on replacing. Basically a third of all the 360s sold to end users to date. Fun!
At least Dutch (or European?) law states that 'durable products' should last for at least three years. No matter what the manufacturer states, the mandatory warranty period is therefore three years (you're not able to claim it without a lot of hassle, though).
I guess it's fair to take the failure rate within those three years for an indication of durability. It *is* troublesome that a product that's been released a year and a half ago already has a 30% failure rate, especially when you take into account that the majority of xbox360's are actually less than one year old.
I don't think it's really that simple. Consider, from a non-engineering perspective:
Or 599 EUROS even. Nevertheless, if the current console wars do justify one saying, then it must be this: You get what you pay for.
Right now, you got three choices:
1. low specs, good quality, decent QA
2. high specs, defective design, lousy QA
3. high specs, decent quality, decent QA.
The choice is yours, obviously, and consumers are better informed after MS stopped denying the problem even existed, hopefully.
A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
in any large company today, the first knee jerk reaction to the statment of fact that they have a issue with a product will be a knee jerk reaction from corperate "how dare you think our products are shitty" after the engeneers and customers can get the point accrost that its not that they think the product is "shitty" just that it has (in some cases serious) issues that need to be worked out, thats what defines weather its "good faith"... if i came into your place of buisness and accused you of under performing and all these mean nasty things, ofcourse your going to get defensive, but if i present facts to you that show that im right, you will start to agree. at that point the company (or you) should take steps to correct the problem, and move on. It would only be bad faith if the company (or you) continued denying the problem for a prolonged period after the facts all came to light. MS (and im no MS fanboy, look at my previous posts on other topics, and good karma) was probably waiting to get a solid fix for the problem, and confirm with the warranty reps that there was infact a problem before they pulled down their pants and beared it all so to speak... the point is, that they had a issue, they have admited it, and have extended a "fix" (extended warranty) to customers to show good faith... i would almost say its a safe bet that all the new machines comming off the line asof today will not have the problems the older ones had, as the time they were "denying" the problem they were also working on a fix... if as a large company i admit i have a issue, but no fix, consumers tend to get upset and distrust the company more than if they only admit theres a problem once they have the fix. You'll find this buisness practice in MANY large companys. Be glad that they have actually extended anything to the customers, as technically if the warranty epired, theres not much ground for the consumer to stand on legally to sue over (however IANAL) unless ofcourse the failure of the unit also caused collatral dammages, such as burning down a house, transforming into a deadly xbox terminator and wipeing out whole familys etc.... MS saw they were loosing customers over this, and once they had it all worked out, took steps to address the issue, and to retain their customers...
Noone writes jokes in base 13!
It would only be bad faith if the company (or you) continued denying the problem for a prolonged period after the facts all came to light.
A prolonged period like a year and a half? These issues existed prior to the initial launch.
the point is, that they had a issue, they have admited it, and have extended a "fix" (extended warranty) to customers to show good faith..
That is *not* showing good faith and that's not why they did it. They did it to avoid a massive class action lawsuit and bad publicity. They only admitted it *after* they were caught lying about it for well over a year. That is not in any conceivable way shape or form "good faith".
Good point. I don't see this mentioned very often. This was situation with my broken 360. When they sent me a replacement, none of my XBLA games would work unless I signed into Live. Very irritating when my internet connection dies and I want to pass the time with XBLA.
This is the same problem you face if you buy the 120GIG hard drive(or buy an elite) and transfer your content from an old hard drive.
Correct except that last part. You will have NO DRM issues by transfering your content from a 20 gig HDD to the 120 gig. Buying the Elite is different as you are replacing the whole system. The System (and your gamertag) is what holds the license. As long as the "Core 360" is the same (Probably based on CPU Serial #), the game license stays.
You know you've found a true loser if you find somebody who feels the need to preemptively declare himself the winner.
Your arguments - that this proves that laws are not good for consumers, or that something goes out of business if it s bad - are so utterly absurd that any reply to them is inherently unneccessary.
The best part, of course, is that I'm not even Norwegian. I'm Swiss. We have a direct democracy, which means our "nanny laws" were put in place by a vote of the people. Yeah, that's right, the people voted to have these "nanny laws." Where does that leave your "people choose something, so it must be good" theory? You think we are too stupid to make these decisions on our own?
Huh? I did not say I quit. I said I felt you did not want to discuss this, but only to insult me, which was why I felt there was no need to reply. However, you then raised some (barely) interesting points, which I felt I should address. But yeah, you're right, I better make an appointment with a shrink right away. Thanks for your diagnosis, you saved me from certain doom. By the way, switching your argument just to reply to another's argument, and faulty uses of reductio ad absurdum also seem pretty insane to me, so you might want to see your shrink, too.
Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? You seem way too angry, considering the fact that you live in your own little free market paradise. I suggest you get help instead of trolling /.
More important than the warranty is, in my opinion, that Microsoft claims that they fixed the issue. I quote Peter Moore from an interview by N'Gai Croal:
Not quite as reassuring as I would have liked, but still good to know.
The Xbox 360:
A product that literally is 'defective by design' (although probably not intentionally, DRM aside).
Privacy begins with