Slashdot Mirror


The Study of Physical Hacks at DefCon

eldavojohn writes "DefCon usually focuses on electronic security, but Saturday a talk was held that focused on possibly the oldest form of hacking — lockpicking. As software security becomes better and better, the focus may be shifting towards simple hacking tips like looking over someone's shoulder for their password, faking employment or just picking the locks to gain access to the building where machines are left on overnight. From the article: 'Medeco deadbolt locks relied on worldwide at embassies, banks and other tempting targets for thieves, spies or terrorists can be opened in seconds with a strip of metal and a thin screw driver, Marc Tobias of Security.org demonstrated for AFP ... Tobias says he refuses to publish details of 'defeating' the locks because they are used in places ranging from homes, banks and jewelers to the White House and the Pentagon. He asked AFP not to disclose how it is done.' I'm sure all Slashdot readers are savvy enough to use firewall(s) but do you know and trust what locks 'physically' protect your data from hacks like these?"

77 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Backstop that lock... by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...with a Smith & Wesson (or a Glock, or a Bushmaster, or a Remington).

    1. Re:Backstop that lock... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, but you do have a valid point. Locks keep honest people honest.

      It isn't difficult to slice through or drill most locks or the doors holding them, let alone picking the lock, but if there is an armed human on the other side that changes the game a bit. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Backstop that lock... by swb · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it was meant to be serious. Locks keep out honest people and lazy criminals (given how often the police issue updates reminding us to lock the doors because they've had a run of unforced entry burglaries, there must be a lot of them).

      Weapons keep out ANYBODY, but watch out for criminal-friendly laws on deadly force that either require you to flee your own home or prove that you were threatened with imminent risk of death or great bodily harm.

      Fortunately where I live, deadly force is justified within your own home top stop the commission of a felony, and burglary is a felony.

    3. Re:Backstop that lock... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, statistically, 100% of unarmed people are unable to repel boarders with arms.

      I have both the ADT sign and the above suggested firearms.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    4. Re:Backstop that lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That argument has been discredited by several studies.

      Just look at how they derive those numbers...they categorize "loved ones" and "family members" and anyone you have ever met.

      If you want the real, peer reviewed scientific analysis on guns in the hands on citizens, just check out the writings of John Lott.

    5. Re:Backstop that lock... by kd5ujz · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    6. Re:Backstop that lock... by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your statistics aren't true, it's a tired argument hauled out by gun ban types based on a repudiated and poor study.

      The problem we have is that since the 1970s, we've emaciated homeowners and law-abiding citizens by making it difficult to use deadly force.

      If, as was the case prior to 1960 in most parts of the US, it was generally assumed that a property owner could use deadly force against an intruder, it would be the equivalent of a "Protected by Smith and Wesson" sign in front of EVERY house, along with criminals having to assume the risk of such crimes.

    7. Re:Backstop that lock... by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Weapons keep out ANYBODY, but watch out for criminal-friendly laws on deadly force that either require you to flee your own home or prove that you were threatened with imminent risk of death or great bodily harm.
      Which is right and proper since in most Western countries the state doesn't demand the death penalty for burglary.
    8. Re:Backstop that lock... by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Which is right and proper since in most Western countries the state doesn't demand the death penalty for burglary."

      You mistake shooting a "burglar" for penalizing said burglar instead of SELF-defense. Defending yourself is not to be confused with lynching.
      A "burglar" (intruder) is a huge risk to the occupant of a house because the intruder has incentive to kill the householder to shut him/her up, and sometimes does.
      Crimes of opportunity in a home invasion include rape, torture, arson to cover up the evidence etc.
      Intruders are not typically like Roger Moore in "The Saint".

      If you don't want to defend yourself, it is your right not to. To say that I cannot defend myself is to say that I don't matter, and those who would violate me do. I respectfully disagree.
      Even in Iraq, the US allows householders one firearm. This is because police response is reactive, not preemptive. All the cops can usually do is collect evidence and maybe arrest the perp for whatever he/she did. This neither does not reverse or prevent damage to the victim.

      When I was TDY to Saudi Arabia, some crackheads decided to party on my property. My wife asked them to leave. They told her to fsck off and made threatening statements. (We lived in an area with light police protection and long response times.) She retreated to the house, got our our Mini-14, and put several warning shots into the ground (not towards the crackheads) where the bullets could be retrieved if required. They promptly left and never returned for the remaining three years we lived there. When the police finally responded, the officer was fine with it. (I love the South!

      The right to violent self-defense is essential to freedom, because if you are forbidden to defend yourself anyone can do their will to you.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    9. Re:Backstop that lock... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't borne out by any evidence. I call a foul and remove the argument from play. No yardage on the call.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Backstop that lock... by HUADPE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would never want one of these signs. It seems like it would attract many criminals whose intent was to steal my gun.

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    11. Re:Backstop that lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >we've emaciated homeowners and law-abiding citizens by making it difficult to use deadly force.

      Why? Were they eating the corpses?

    12. Re:Backstop that lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      100% of unarmed people are unable to repel boarders with arms Make that 99.9%, you forgot Chuck Norris.
    13. Re:Backstop that lock... by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends. My grandfather keeps an unloaded handgun in a drawer by his bed. It's his contention that a burglar isn't going to ask to see the magazine when they're on the wrong end of the barrel.

      Or you could do what Pat McManus does, and have an alarm system that doesn't beep, it plays the sound of a pump-action 12-gauge. A gun doesn't have to be dangerous to be a deterrent.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    14. Re:Backstop that lock... by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Weapons keep out ANYBODY

      So if I buy a gun and keep it in my house, a magical force field will keep all criminals out?

      This logic seems horrribly flawed. But then again, I'm not a rabid pro-gun idiot, so I'm obviously unenlightened and unworthy of commenting in this discussion.

    15. Re:Backstop that lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Self-defense should be proportional to the actual threat.

      Shooting any burglar because some burglars might become violent is just stupid. If the burglar is coming at you, fine. If he's trying to leave or running away, no.

    16. Re:Backstop that lock... by Loucks · · Score: 2, Informative

      This statistic is tossed around quite a bit, but I'll bet you can't cite a source. There was one study that found this (I believe it was 21x more likely), but it has been pretty thoroughly debunked. There's no need to let reality prevent your anti-gun agenda, though. Carry on!

    17. Re:Backstop that lock... by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 2, Informative

      And how large of a blade exactly do you think it takes to kill a person?

      It doesn't need to be three inches, I'll tell you that much. Espically if the person is unarmed...or asleep in their bed.

    18. Re:Backstop that lock... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's much more effective to have an alarm system than it is to back up your deadbolt locks with a gun.

      You sir, are a fucking idiot.

      So you're saying it's better to have an alarm system which usually takes over a minute to alert the alarm company, then about 30 seconds for them to call your local dispatch center. Then another 30 seconds for the dispatcher to get the information. Then they have to give the info out to the officers...and in a lot of places (other than Big City USA) it can take 15 minutes or more for the officers to arrive.

      My wife used to be a dispatcher. Most nights in our county there would be one officer on. And their policy on a break-in was to wait for another officer to get out of bed, get dressed, get in his car, and drive 30 minutes from the middle of nowhere to your house.

      So you're saying you should have no defense against someone breaking in to harm you and/or your family for a minimum of 5-10 minutes?

      Like I said, you sir are a fucking idiot.

      I am a man, and I will stand up and defend my family.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    19. Re:Backstop that lock... by dwarfsoft · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not forgetting those that just want to steal your sign...

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    20. Re:Backstop that lock... by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a slashdotter you insensitive clod. Of course I'd be in the house. In the basement too, stuffing my face with pizza, emailing old korean people "In Soviet Russia" jokes while watching Natalie Portman movies.

      It's not like I'd have other things to do ;).

      Actually, might be better to get comprehensive insurance, and put nonreplaceable valuables in a good safe (backups, passports, certs etc) - mark it "No cash in here - documents only".

      --
    21. Re:Backstop that lock... by rpbird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a little tale that will enlighten. A buddy and I were both teachers at a local community college. One night, after finals, we met for coffee at a restaurant just off campus. I drove an ordinary little compact car. When I parked the car, I rolled up the windows and locked the doors. My briefcase was on the front seat. A chimp with a rock could have been in my car in seconds. My buddy had an old MG convertible with the top down. He stuffed his briefcase behind the seat. Someone stole his briefcase. Mine was still in my car. A small but significant percentage of the population are only situationally honest. Given a chance, they'll be crooks. The cheap locks on my rusty old Datsun would keep a real crook out for about two seconds; but they are good enough to keep the lazy crook and the situational crook out. Locks are a filter. There are very few hard-core criminals, but lots of situational crooks. Locks keep the situational crooks away. To defeat the serious criminal, I'd recommend the human element: a rentacop with a cell phone.

    22. Re:Backstop that lock... by Filip22012005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's only illegal near spawn points.

      --
      When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    23. Re:Backstop that lock... by Filip22012005 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not entirely the same, but still interesting: http://www.amstat.org/PUBLICATIONS/chance/103.myth 0.pdf. It's 10 years old though. Still, there are some relevant numbers in the article. Atlanta Police Department reports show that, in 198 cases of burglary, offenders obtained the victim's gun in 6 cases. Victims were able to use their gun in self-defense in only 3 cases.

      --
      When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    24. Re:Backstop that lock... by dasunt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed.

      IMO, any rational burglar will attempt to flee once he or she discovers that the residence is occupied and the occupant is armed.

      Any burglar who does not flee once the occupant announces that he or she is armed loses the benefit of the doubt in my book. The burglar is clearly involved in an illegal act and is not making an attempt to flee when discovered. That is not a good sign, and the occupant is justified in assuming that his or her life is threatened, IMO.

    25. Re:Backstop that lock... by knewter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The kind of person that puts one of those signs in the front yard has no problem with said criminals coming to take it. He kind of yearns for it.

      If someone's going to be an asshole, I'd rather they try it against someone who is overwhelmingly better-armed than they are.

      --
      -knewter
    26. Re:Backstop that lock... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The right to violent self-defense is essential to freedom...
      It is also essential to get those high homicide rates. Your call."

      Lawful self-defense /= homicide.

      "Self-defense should be proportional to the actual threat.
      Shooting any burglar because some burglars might become violent is just stupid. If the burglar is coming at you, fine. If he's trying to leave or running away, no."

      The applicable laws cover that. They vary by state, so do read yours.

      "Your wife is a psycho. (and apparently you are as well, from the tone of your post)"

      Nice troll, but note I mentioned firing into the ground to facilitate bullet retrieval. That is not "psychotic"
      We both have military training and are disciplined shooters. Making noise to scare away the crackheads worked, no one was injured, and the situation was de-escalated nicely. What you may (and others who may be unfamiliar with the way criminals like crackheads think) not understand is that they only respect people who appear scary. I'm not some crazed redneck, but I'll emulate one if it is useful. Crackheads are not deterred by the consequences of crack use, so that worldview limits the things that do deter them. :)

      "Then all of a sudden it is the burglar who is being threatened for life, and who feels a need to defend yourself. Do you really want to go into that spiral?"
      There is no spiral. Burglar has choice of turning and running or being shot. If he entered an occupied residence he may be presumed willing to attack and subdue anyone in that residence. If he hopped my fence and continued past my barking dogs he was determined to enter.
      I'm not advocating trap guns or other nonsense, I'm advocating reasonable latitude in defending myself and other humans in my house where I have the reasonable (through human history) expectation of security. If I get burgled and no one is home, that's why I buy home insurance!

      "A burglar has no intent to kill. If he would, why not do armed robbery instead? Why not take people hostage, take them to their home, clear out and kill them?"

      He may have no INITIAL intent to kill/rape/assault. Your statement seems to imply burglars are a logical, rational lot. Some meth head who has been awake for thirty days may start out to burgle, but they aren't necessarily going to stick to that. Never assume the bad guy is interested in your logic. I'm not expecting to defend against Slashdotters, so I don't assume crooks think like Slashdotters. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    27. Re:Backstop that lock... by stevemm81 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chuck Norris is 1/10 of one percent of the population

  2. Protection by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>do you know and trust what locks 'physically' protect your data from hacks like these?"

    I know I weld my doors shut nightly. You should too!

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    1. Re:Protection by KingJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know I weld my doors shut nightly. You should too!

      I tried that with my wooden doors, didn't work out too well...
      --
      I rent game servers, see my homepage for more information
    2. Re:Protection by mcpkaaos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Using doors for physical security is so 90s. I keep my servers suspended over an open pit of RIAA lawyers.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    3. Re:Protection by maeka · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do you resist the temptation to let the servers drop?

    4. Re:Protection by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do they have friggen laser beams attached to their briefcases?

  3. "Hacking" by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFS,

    "...simple hacking tips like looking over someone's shoulder for their password."

    How far the meaning of this word has come from it's original usage.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    1. Re:"Hacking" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Language, how it doth change! How I mifs the language of yore, and fmite the technological neologifms brought.. ironically.. by the self-proclaimed "hackers" who then complain that the word they used to describe themselves has evolved in meaning.

    2. Re:"Hacking" by multisync · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm reminded of Ralph Macchio asking Mr. Miyagi what kind of belt he had in the Karate Kid. Mr. Miyagi's answer:

      "Canvas. JC Penny. Three ninety-eight. You like?"

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
  4. Locks are pretty much useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because doors are riddled with 0-day exploits in the frames and hinges. With even a small vehicle, you can exploit a stack-overflow in the frame, popping the entire door out. DOS attacks against hinge pins can also be used to completely bypass a lock.

  5. Wetware hacking by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the focus may be shifting towards simple hacking tips like looking over someone's shoulder for their password, faking employment or just picking the locks to gain access to the building where machines are left on overnight.

    It's not shifting at all. I've done my share of hacking when I was younger (ahem) and the weakest link was always the human link. It was much easier to con the secretary into giving a password than hacking the secretary's computer, and I suspect it's even more the case now with more solid computer systems. That's called social engineering and it will always work very well indeed, because much to my dismay, computer users get dumber and dumber as computer get more and more powerful.

    As for lockpicking, it's not really a secret that no lock is safe. Look up "bump key" in your favorite search engine and you'll see what I mean.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  6. Kind of a related question by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do they put door locks on a convertible?

    --
    What?
  7. How to pick Medeco locks by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google is your friend. All of about 30 seconds of searching came up with this article as well as others. Although I didn't watch them I also found a few videos posted on YouTube that claim to demonstrate how to do it.

    1. Re:How to pick Medeco locks by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

      From what the original poster's article said, this appears to be a valid method against the original Medeco and the Medeco Biaxial line [1], but I don't see how this would have any effect at all versus the latest Medeco3 mechanism (well, latest since 2003), which uses side bitting on the key as well as the usual Medeco rotating pins.

      Other than Medeco, there is one type of lock that would be excellent for security, Abloy's Protec line, which from what I read takes 10-12 hours to pick even for the pros at detainer disk type of locks. However, the Protec line isn't sold in the US. Older Abloy lines are decent, but it would take far less time for a pro to pick them open. There are other high security locks out there, and one can read from a lock site what the weaknesses are of each of them.

      Nothing is 100% secure. If some thief is determined enough to bypass something, they can.

      Lastly, high security locks just one tool, in a toolbox of security options. If its worth locking with a high security cylinder, its worth having a centrally monitored alarm system (with a duress code [2] option.)

      [1]: Biaxial isn't that much more secure than the original Medeco, but it allows for (IIRC) 10 times as many key combinations, allowing for more flexible keying options.

      [2]: Yes, home invasions are on the rise, so make sure an alarm system has a duress feature (where it disarms, but silently calls the central station)... and USE the alarm. If at home, use the alarm's "at home" feature which monitors the doors and windows, but doesn't arm the IR detectors. A high security lock is no good when it is opened by the owner at gunpoint.

    2. Re:How to pick Medeco locks by eggoeater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what the original poster's article said, this appears to be a valid method against the original Medeco and the Medeco Biaxial line...
      Sorry, but I'm not buying the article the GP pointed to...it's simply saying "modify a diamond shaped lock pick...etc etc". I don't see how ANY lock picking solution can get around correctly rotating the pins so the holes line up with the sidebar. Added to that, there are many things to help defeat the constant tension during a pick, mushroom pins being one.

      You seem to know a thing or two about Medeco locks (like the fact that there's a diff. between the original and Biaxial). If you know/see something about the article I don't, please let me know. My father worked for Medeco (and I briefly worked in their factory one summer) and I'm sure he'd love to know.

      Also, last I heard, there was still a reward offered by Medeco for picking a lock at their headquarters in Salem VA.

    3. Re:How to pick Medeco locks by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The OP's article really didn't have much detail, but there are other sites that one can check out that have more details on attacks on Medeco locks.

      The Medeco reward I've heard about in a number of different forms, so I'm not sure the exact details. Last I heard, if someone can pick 3 Medeco cylinders (the six pin type found in deadbolts, not the four or five that are used as replacement for disk tumbler cylinder replacements.), they get a prize. However I have no clue what the real status of that is.

      Nothing is unpickable by someone who knows their stuff and has the manual dexterity. Its slowing people down, to where even a skilled lock manipulator will take hours to open the lock, which will most likely mean detection. Its also forcing someone to leave a signature (scratches), so if stuff does get taken, one can prove to an insurance company that a lock was defeated or something was broken.

      Mushroom pins help, but are just one security mechanism, forcing locksmiths to jam the pins up, then let them float downward to the shear line, rather than pushing pins up from their resting place. I'm pretty sure the sidebar is pickable by some tool that rotates the pins, as its talked about on various lockpicking sites.

      This is one reason I recommend high security locks. If someone kicks down a door or breaks a window, that leaves a noticable signature where a claim with insurance has more ground. If someone's house is robbed by a bumped lock, there is no trace, and it goes to a word against word thing to prove that stuff was there, and is now not.

      It may be the security has nothing to do with the tumbler mechanism. In some locks are weaknesses that have nothing to do with the cylinder used. For example, one lock I have has a very pick resistant cylinder, but one can use a shim and the lock pops right open.

      Lastly, some people may state security through obscurity, but I'm glad that the methods of opening Medeco deadbolts are not made public. Physical locks can't be updated like most programs can. Every cylinder in a building would need replacing, and that would amount to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, factoring in parts, labor, the time it takes to deploy a new keying system, getting the new keys to all the employees, etc.

    4. Re:How to pick Medeco locks by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This attack sounds like one I heard about 10 years ago. Some kid showed up at a locksmith convention selling Medeco opening kits for cheap. A former buddy bought one.

      Basically, the trick is you don't pick the lock at all. You pass the metal strip THROUGH the body of the lock and out the back, and use it to retract the bolt mechanism behind the cylinder. Damned clever attack.

      --
      John
  8. Yeah but just try a remote DDOS with zombies by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah you can get an army of zombies to help you pick the lock, but you have to get the in close proximity to the lock and make sure they don't trip over each other.

    Besides, most zombies don't have the physical dexterity necessary for good lock-picking. In large groups they are good at tearing the door off its hinges or ramming through it though.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  9. If its anything like hacking.. by g0dsp33d · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's probably a door around back that is standing open.

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
  10. How Medeco locks work by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Informative

    The cuts in the key are individually angled so they rotate the tumblers as well as lifting them. Slots in the tumblers are lined up by the rotation to unlock a sidebar that fits into a longitudinal slot in the cylinder.

    Bump keys can't even get started opening that.

    More burglars have feet than have lockpicking skills. Step one in physical security is to combat kick-in attacks. Replace your strike plate, which I can almost guarantee is inadequate, with a reinforced model like the Mag-3 and most important, install it with #10 wood screws at least 3" long, so it can't tear out of the studs when subjected to a good kick. Predrill the holes and put soap on the threads so you don't break screws as you install it.

    A block watch is a great idea too. Neighbors are a security mechanism.

    An alarm system also protects you against fire, which depending on where you live can be a bigger threat than burglary.

    1. Re:How Medeco locks work by Tamugin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Predrill the holes and put soap on the threads so you don't break screws as you install it.

      Replace soap with beeswax in this case. The moisture in soap will affect the wood surrounding the screws and weaken it. Beeswax leaves the wood in good shape as well as helping you to drive 3" screws without shearing the heads off when you're almost finished.

      --
      Chris
    2. Re:How Medeco locks work by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...defeated, of course, by the nearest prowler with a drugged steak...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  11. anecdotal by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One summer I was forced to park right in the same neighborhood as crack houses, etc, because of where I had to work. As did my co workers. They all locked their doors and trunks, result, all of them got busted glass and popped trunks. I warned them too, I really did, I said "look at reality, these cars are targets now". Nope, none of them listened. I left my doors unlocked and the trunk slightly open, just eased down. The ride was so old and ratty I wasn't afraid of it getting stolen, albeit that was a chance. There was nothing left in the car to steal, a very cheap in dash radio not even worth a dollar at a pawn shop, but I made it easy for the crooks to ascertain that, because I knew they would look.

    Ya, it sucked doing that,the principle rankled me, but my practical nature took over, because it was better than having to replace a door window.

    Most modern stick frame construction houses are vulnerable to a razor knife. Just pick a section of wall and slice a hole. You got plastic siding, a thin tyvek sheet, some cheap ass pressboard stuff,(glorified cardboard really), some spun fiberglass insulation, then drywall. That's all you need, a couple minutes with a razor knife and any thief can get in easy, let alone if they use something like a cordless sawzall thing.

    1. Re:anecdotal by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most modern stick frame construction houses are vulnerable to a razor knife.

      There were thieves in Chicago(and I'm sure elsewhere) that would steal whole garages, bricks and all. Turns out they could sell the bricks. And watch out for stolen manhole covers. That could really hurt. Well, you have the right idea. Don't go through those neighborhoods wearing your nice shoes.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:anecdotal by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My (now ex) girlfriend's glass/jewelry shop was broken into that way repeatedly: she had bars on the windows, a reinforced doorframe, a good lock, but the buildings on either side of her didn't and people broke into them and cut through the wall into her place. And cleaned out the other places, while they were at it... One time they just kicked through drywall, but the others they used a sawzall because there was an exterior wall on one side.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  12. It's the form factor, stupid. by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A big problem with mechanical locks is the form factor. Anything that has to fit in a standard US cylinder lock hole is inherently weak. It's just too small.

    There are some good locking systems out of Israel. Mul-T-Lock makes door locks that extend three or four deadbolts through the door and into the frame, like a vault door. These are made to work like ordinary door lever locks.

    The best residential doors are found in older HUD-financed housing projects in bad neighborhoods. Apartment doors are steel fire doors mounted in steel frames, and walls are reinforced concrete. Those things will resist a battering ram. The lock mechanisms usually aren't that great, but the threat there is generally brute force, not lockpicking.

    It's surprisingly hard to get good doors and locks in the US. There are better locks in parts of the Third World.

    1. Re:It's the form factor, stupid. by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's surprisingly hard to get good doors and locks in the US. There are better locks in parts of the Third World. Mostly because there is greater demand there.

      Of course in such places the criminals simply find ways to not have to open the lock. I'm sure in some of those places the door literally has to withstand a battering ram, car powered one that is, or it isn't of much use. In Poland criminals didn't even bother to pick locks to apartments half the time, they simply found some old lady carrying groceries to her apartment then offered to help carry them for her. Then as soon as she opened the door they punched her out (or killed her or just pushed her out of the way if she was lucky) and robbed her apartment. And I don't mean a few did this, I mean all of them did this.
  13. Medeco by ls671 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you need to check out medico locks if you think they are in the same line of locks that can be picked with a bump key.

    I think it is medeco http://www.medeco.com/ not "medico". Medico locks are for locking up your girlfriend so nobody can access her private parts.

    These locks are harder, but not impossible to bump for a very skilled locksmith. Nothing is 100% hack-proof, just harder to hack.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  14. Crypto by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's what encryption is for. Even with physical access, your files are secure as long as the key lives inside your brain.
    Of course they can then be deleted, but someone who would have access to my computer could only "damage" my most precious data, not read it. A computer does not work like a safe, it can be much more efficient.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  15. Locks are easy by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Locks are easy compared to trying to unhook her bra with your left hand in the dark.

  16. Encryption - easier to use than you might think by Cheesey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm currently managing a transition to using only encrypted file systems, using loop-aes. As the parent says, one reason to use encrypted file systems is protection against burglars. The access keys for the data disappear as soon as the power is disconnected, so the burglar gets the hardware but no data. Thieves have to be unusually smart if they want to copy the plaintext - they'll have to trick you into revealing the key to them somehow.

    But it doesn't just protect my data from burglars. It also enables me to return hard disks for warranty replacement without worrying that the manufacturer will be able to look through my files. I don't have to scrub my disks before sending them off. Disk scrubbing is never 100% effective, and might not even be possible if the controller has failed.

    Loop-aes is now supported by Debian stable. I just needed to apt-get two packages, loop-aes-utils and loop-aes-modules-$KERNELVERSION. Through this, it is very easy to add non-root encrypted filesystems to your machine. An encrypted root filesystem is harder to arrange, but well worth having. There are HOWTO guides to help you set one up. The usual implementation requires you to enter a passphrase as your machine boots.

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  17. Keyboard JitterBug eavesdropping by stock · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Dell key-logger hoax has probably the best decoy story to move
    professional hackers/security staffers into the wrong direction, as in
    May 2006, USENIX published the following research article :

    "Keyboards and Covert Channels"
      by Gaurav Shah, Andres Molina and Matt Blaze , 2006-05-17
      Department of Computer and Information Science
      University of Pennsylvania
    http://www.usenix.org/events/sec06/tech/shah/shah_ html/jbug-Usenix06.html

    In it the authors demonstrate that todays unwarranted wire tapping NSA
    activities, normally don't result in much success as serious internet
    users routinely apply encryption into their communications, like IPSec
    tunneling, ssh, VPN access connections, secure web-traffic https when
    i.e. doing Internet banking activities.

    However, secret service found a clever approach to all this, by
    covertly installing a Keyboard JitterBug into your keyboard. Here's
    how to secure your most trusted keyboard :

    Keyboard JitterBug eavesdropping
    http://crashrecovery.org/internet/#jitter

    where i may add, that lock picking _ALSO_ has been the best hoax ever
    on public display. Why? How many people today design their _OWN_
    locksmith locks? All installed door-locks worldwide are somehow sold in
    stores, hence its products and replacement keys are in the archives of
    the local secret service.

    Robert

  18. For details... by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 3, Informative
    See tobias's post on engadget a couple weeks ago: http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/the-lockdown-th e-medeco-m3-meets-the-perilous-paper-clip/

    Medeco offers several levels of key control to insure that its patent protected blanks cannot be copied, replicated or simulated. In many systems, proprietary keyways are available to further ensure that keys cannot be improperly compromised. Although the m3 is a very secure lock, we were able to simulate Medeco keys that can be made to bypass the keyway and slider protection of almost any system -- all without infringing on any Medeco intellectual property. It turns out that a standard paper clip will depress the slider precisely to the correct position. A wire or paper clip, fashioned as shown, is inserted into the keyway and wedged at the end of the body of the slider.
    So, with a proper paperclip, you can eliminate the additional security and remove its advantages against certain types of attacks.
    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  19. If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by fantomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parent's point I'd guess would be that it's an arms war. If you're saying that the way to stop being knifed is to carry a knife yourself, then the criminals carry guns. And if you match that with a gun, surely the only solution is for everybody to carry fecking ridiculous big guns around? Personally I am happy to be able to walk down to the shops without needing to carry a weapon.

    If weapons stop crime, how come the USA, one of the most tooled up countries in the world, has so much crime and so many people die from gun injuries?

    1. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by Rakishi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Parent's point I'd guess would be that it's an arms war. Not really, there are legal limits on what guns can be owned and who can own them. As a result law abiding citizens have easier access to weapons and training in how to use them. As a result the criminals are at a perpetual disadvantage.

      If you're saying that the way to stop being knifed is to carry a knife yourself, then the criminals carry guns. No you carry around a gun, knife fights aren't something I wish to engage in.

      If weapons stop crime, how come the USA, one of the most tooled up countries in the world, has so much crime and so many people die from gun injuries? The US crime rate is mostly due to gang violence between gang members as well as certain unfortunate people who are forced to live in gang territories. This in turn is due to the lovely war on drugs that should have never started. Also only half of murders are committed with guns and many of those are in areas with heavy gun restrictions for civilians. Amazing how the murder rate in Washington, DC is absurdly high (I do mean absurdly) and yet it is basically illegal for a civilian to own a gun.

      Also if guns are the cause of all evil how come after they were mostly banned in the UK the crime rate hasn't budged, knife murders are way up, burglaries are 3 times that in the US and rapes are also close to 3 times that in the US (rate wise of course).
    2. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If weapons stop crime, how come the USA, one of the most tooled up countries in the world, has so much crime and so many people die from gun injuries?

      This argument always pops up when the topic is guns. And I always counter by asking why Finland, which is in the top five when it comes to guns per capita, has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

      The roots of the American crime problem lies somewhere else than guns. Try income inequality and poverty if you really want some kind of beginnings of an real answer, instead of reinforcement to preexisting memes.
    3. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by zmollusc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here in the uk it seems (although i cannot be arsed to look for stats) that shootings are steadily increasing in frequency, too.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    4. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by Engine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The vast majority of the guns in Finland are hunting rifles, which are awkward to use when mugging someone and far from ideal in a gang war. A gun that is designed and bought to be used against people, will much more likely be used that way, than a gun that is made to shoot elks (mooses).

      But I agree that a big part of the problem is, as you say, income inequality and poverty.

    5. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If weapons stop crime, how come the USA, one of the most tooled up countries in the world, has so much crime and so many people die from gun injuries?"

      Because of the gun control laws in place, funnily enough. If in this country you could easily and legally carry around a concealed firearm, criminals would be less inclined to attack you because it's legal and easy for you to have a gun to defend yourself. With the gun laws as they are, the odds are in favor of the law breaking criminal who HAS a concealed weapon who bets you aren't armed.

      And if you let me walk to the store with my concealed weapon, the fact that I have one and you don't doesn't matter because the CHANCE of you having one is the deterrent.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    6. Re:If guns stop crime then why crime in the USA? by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The vast majority of the guns in Finland are hunting rifles, which are awkward to use when mugging someone and far from ideal in a gang war. The vast majority of guns in the USA are also hunting rifles. Your point?
      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  20. Re:Interesting by icegreentea · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can't bump medeco's. the pins are all placed on angles (like 15 degrees or something). that's was the whole point of medeco's to start with, they're impossible to bump, and a headache to pick traditionally.

  21. Digital locks are fun - Samsonite by cheros · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember buying a Samsonite briefcase with digital lock. Two weeks later I had a bunch of people try to open it over a weekend. Nobody managed to crack the 4 digit lock during the two days despite trying all available combinations and despite me opening it every time when I was handed it.

    Why?

    Because they DIDN'T try all available combinations. I discovered that the Samsonite digital lock with 4 positions from 0..9 can have a total of 11110 combinations instead of 10000 because you do not need to use all positions (which is not even in the little manual). In other words, the number of possible combinations is 10000 + 1000 + 100 + 10. The combination in use was "9" with me pretending to press the remaining 3 digits so there was a little bit of misdirection involved :-)

    Having said that, that specific lock has a more fundamental flaw that allows it to be easily reset, and this type of briefcase is not popular with airport security so I eventually stopped using it.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  22. Cracking, not hacking by Trixter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lockpicking is the oldest form of cracking, not hacking. Hacking is best summed up as "unconventional and creative use of technology". It is not a synonym for breaking and entering.

    This used to be news for nerds -- please get it right.

  23. Re:The article summary must be misleading. by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gotta agree with you on this one. I too am somewhat familiar with the Medeco series of locks and until I see
    someone actually open one without a key, I will remain very, very skeptical of any claim otherwise.

    The units I am familiar with were used on high security doors. Things like weapons lockers, arms magazines,
    even my Armored Box Launched Tomahawk Cruise missile launchers. . . . .

    I did lock picking as a hobby and a means to keep my sanity during deployments. I was able to pull apart a
    Medeco cylinder to see what made them so tough. Besides the fact that the pins are made of carbide ( as well
    as carbide inserts in the face of the lock to deter drilling ) there is no shear line that you will be able to
    hear or feel.

    Medeco's use an angled tumbler concept where a hole is drilled into the side of each tumbler. The key is
    beveled so it will both lift and twist the pin to the proper height and angle for the drilled hole to line
    up with a pinned sidebar. My cylinder was equipped with six or seven tumblers. Thus lifting to the correct
    height, twisting for the correct angle and holding it for each of the tumblers is a very tall order for someone
    trying to ' pick ' the lock.

    Once all the tumblers are lifted to height X and twisted for angle Y, all of the drilled holes line up with the
    pins on the sidebar. The sidebar is able to seat and the cylinder will now open.

    Bottom line, they can make all the claims they want. I'll believe it when I see it. Easier to blast the door open
    with some C-4. :)

  24. razor, no by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Most modern stick frame construction houses are vulnerable to a razor knife. Just pick a section of wall and slice a hole. You got plastic siding, a thin tyvek sheet, some cheap ass pressboard stuff,(glorified cardboard really), some spun fiberglass insulation, then drywall. That's all you need, a couple minutes with a razor knife and any thief can get in easy, let alone if they use something like a cordless sawzall thing."

    The "pressboard stuff" you're referring to is called OSB (Oriented Strand Board). Yeah it does look cheap, like scraps glued together, but actually it's stronger than either plywood or a wooden plank of the same thickness. (Both plywood and OSB are what they call engineered woods)

    Anyways there's no way in hell you're going to punch a hole that you can walk through on an OSB exterior wall with a razor, in any reasonable amount of time. (it will take you hours)

    Yes you can saw through it with a power tool, but that applies to any wooden house of any vintage, not just "modern stick frame" ones.

  25. Abloy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really don't want to advertise but here in Finland about 99.99% of households and companies use Abloy locks. Yes, they have sort of monopoly here but that's gained on true merits. The locks are so hard to pick, that if you lose your key, locksmiths will just break your door or the lock if possible. It's not worth spending 10 hours picking it. A second good reason for using Abloy is that it doesn't freeze or get jammed as like pinlocks. There does exists tools to open Abloy locks but they can be used only on models made in the 70's so they basically useless.

    1. Re:Abloy by eskotanakka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably so but at least your military uses (some) Abloy locks...

    2. Re:Abloy by advid.net · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems that Abloy now owns Medeco. Of course this doesn't change the design of Medeco locks.

  26. Medeco deadbolt locks - that's easy! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Medeco deadbolt locks ... can be opened in seconds with a strip of metal and a thin screw driver..."

    The thin strip of metal is called a "key" - you insert it into the "lock", and turn it. I'm not sure of the screwdriver's purpose. Perhaps you use it to scratch your head, wondering why you brought it along.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  27. Is there an off topic mod? by pnice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I came in here to read about locks and lock security and lockpicking. Instead it has turned into almost complete gun control debate. Letting people stray so far off topic should be discouraged so we can read posts that relate more to the subject at hand. /if there is an off topic mod I guess this should be given the same rank as well.