Slashdot Mirror


Space Hotel to Open in 2012

blackdefiance writes "The New York Times is reporting that firm plans for the first hotel in space are now in the works. Slated for a 2012 opening, 'Galactic Suite' will cost about $4 million for a three-day stay. 'They may have solved the issue of how to take a shower in weightlessness -- the guests will enter a spa room in which bubbles of water will float around. When guests are not admiring the view from their portholes they will take part in scientific experiments on space travel. Galactic Suite began as a hobby for former aerospace engineer Claramunt, until a space enthusiast decided to make the science fiction fantasy a reality by fronting most of the $3 billion needed to build the hotel. An American company intent on colonizing Mars, which sees Galaxy Suite as a first step, has since come on board, and private investors from Japan, the United States and the United Arab Emirates are in talks.'"

137 comments

  1. 2012? Damn. by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 4, Funny

    The new space hotel sounds great, but a flight to space conflicts with the part of my schedule where I'm slated to die during the apocalypse.

    1. Re:2012? Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All of the apocalypse stories that I've heard talk about some doom that is going to happen on the Earth. It seems like that would be the perfect time to take a vacation in orbit.

    2. Re:2012? Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only billionnaires need apply!

    3. Re:2012? Damn. by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry, we're all going to get rich selling avatars on Second Life! Haven't you heard?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:2012? Damn. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      IT would be nice for the apocalypse to wipe out a lot of the billionaires like the evil ones like mr burns.

    5. Re:2012? Damn. by morari · · Score: 1

      Though a Mayan prediction (and not even really of the End but a new beginning), I can't wait for the Apocalypse, or more specifically the Rapture. The moment when all the Christians world over suddenly disappear will be a great day!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:2012? Damn. by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      But then, if the Christians disappear as they say they will, wouldn't it mean that they were right? And there would be an Antichrist and a Great Tribulation? If only Christians disappear, it infers that their POV is the correct one, everyone else is wrong, and things go bad quickly.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    7. Re:2012? Damn. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Erm... It's said that Teh Apocalypse may actually involve ASTEROIDS // debris from space... Guess who gets hit 1st then?

      --Regardless; I may apply for an Ops position at the Space Hyatt (or whatever) if this really happens. Instead of paying $millions, I get paid to WORK IN SPACE. How freakin' cool would that be? ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:2012? Damn. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Psst.. Mr Burns isn't real.

      He's just an animatronic device controlled by Smithers. Smithers is the true evil.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:2012? Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone always looks at this Mayan 2012 shit as an apolcalyptic prediction, but afaik it's not really that specific. It just talks about the end of a major era. Even though we all know this space hotel deal isn't really going to happen in 2012, it'd be cool if it did. The mayans would be on to something if we look at 2012 as the year we begin to seriously begin civilian space exploration. Think about it, I think that counts as a dawn of a new age.

    10. Re:2012? Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On balance though, it would still be a positive thing.

    11. Re:2012? Damn. by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think OmgTEHMATRICKS is referring specifically to the apocalypse stories based on the end of the Mayan calender. December 21st, 2012, is the last day of their 5,125 year calander, leading some to believe that that date signifies the end of time (and the universe i gather). If that were true, it wouldn't matter where you were, as long as you were still in the universe.

      The theory is pretty convincing if you look at all the other weird things expected to happen that year at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012.

      * Second and last solar transit of the planet Venus of this century
      * July 1 -- The first possible government in Hong Kong elected by Universal suffrage take office - Like the Chinese will ever let that happen.
      * October 19 -- at 1:36 UTC, the Earth will be home to 7 billion people
      * November 6 -- United States presidential election, 2012 - Like Emperor Bush will ever let that happen
      * NASA's new Orion spacecraft is scheduled to become fully operational for International Space Station support flights - Like NASA will ever actually complete anything.
      * the Sun will also reverse its own magnetic poles during 2012 as result of reaching the end of the current 11-year sunspot cycle
      * The Canadian Navy receives the delivery of the first Joint Support Ship - Canada has a Navy?
      * asteroid 2004MN4 comes into view again to recalculate odds of impact. - Scientist: "is that 2004MN4, that fiery thing that takes up half the sky."
      And finally,
      * Charles Manson will be eligible for a parole hearing again - Nuff said.

    12. Re:2012? Damn. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Put it this way: I wouldn't bet your life on them being WRONG. ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    13. Re:2012? Damn. by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Smithers is a fake name, used to help Mr. Smith hide. Mr. Smith knows all about you, Neo. The Matrix has you still.

      --
      I love my sig.
    14. Re:2012? Damn. by Iron+Condor · · Score: 2, Funny

      If that were true, it wouldn't matter where you were, as long as you were still in the universe.

      ...and What happens in the universe, stays in the universe.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  2. About time by Eesu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its about time some private people and companies start taking a major interest in space.

    1. Re:About time by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      Not yet there isn't. They'll find a way to make money off it, I'm sure.

    2. Re:About time by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and since private companies will face none of the safety and testing issues that folks like NASA have to contend with, they should be able to just slap this together and start shuttling paying tourists up there in no time. I'm surprised it's even going to take 5 years!

    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since companies serve people on Earth, it's a bit nonsensical for them to have an interest in space.
      So far, communications satellites are profitable. What other money making schemes are there in an age where sending anything into space is extremely expensive?
      Big fricken' lasers on the moon and blackmail?

    4. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Yes, and since private companies will face none of the safety and testing issues that folks like NASA have to contend with, they should be able to just slap this together and start shuttling paying tourists up there in no time.

      And, just WHO is the company going to call to save the tourists' asses when things get fscked-up up there? I hope to hell MY tax dollars aren't spent for NASA to attempt something - at present, THEY don't even have the tech to save their own people.

    5. Re:About time by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Why was this post "insightful"? I thought it was "funny".

    6. Re:About time by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I hope they can do better than NASA. They produce the most unsafe, expensive and unreliable transport system ever conceived by man. And I'm being polite.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    7. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and since companies serve people that live on land it's nonsensical for them to have an interest in waterways. oh, wait, no, it just turns out your logic is total crap.

  3. Should we entrust space travel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to someone who uses the phrase 'shuttle rocket'


    Did he design this station on his PC computer?
    1. Re:Should we entrust space travel... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      "...to someone who uses the phrase 'shuttle rocket'"

      ... you mean like the Delta Clipper project?.

  4. Higher paying jobs. by cyanyde · · Score: 1

    This is how we keep the economy afloat.

  5. Launch Vehicle by Fenresulven · · Score: 1

    How are they going to get people on and off the station?
    My first thought was Dragon, but according to the SpaceX website the price for even the cheapest Falcon9 to LEO is 35 million, with a suggested price of 4 million for a three day stay and the Dragon capsule being capable of carrying 7 people this can't possibly be profitable (or even close to break even).
    Anyone know what launch vehicle they're planning to use?

    1. Re:Launch Vehicle by pluther · · Score: 4, Funny

      the price for even the cheapest Falcon9 to LEO is 35 million, with a suggested price of 4 million for a three day stay and the Dragon capsule being capable of carrying 7 people this can't possibly be profitable

      $4 million is just the room charge.

      Transportation is extra.

      You don't want to know what delivery costs for the pizza.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    2. Re:Launch Vehicle by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't want to know what delivery costs for the pizza.

      I bet Chinese food will be quite economical by that time.

    3. Re:Launch Vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't want to know what delivery costs for the pizza.

      But you won't have to pay unless they can get it to you within 30 minutes

    4. Re:Launch Vehicle by tazsl · · Score: 1

      Winguardium Leviosa !!

      Ron,would you like to see my magic wand?--H.P.

      --
      for every complex problem , there is a solution that is simple , neat , and wrong.
    5. Re:Launch Vehicle by icepick72 · · Score: 1

      And don't even think about opening the bar fridge.

    6. Re:Launch Vehicle by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the shuttle bus ride from the airport to the hotel probably won't be free.

  6. Skeptical by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Despite being a pretty hardcore private space proponent, I'm rather skeptical about this. I could be wrong, but it seems that all Claramunt has is a design and backing from an anonymous funding source. Meanwhile, Bigelow Aerospace has a couple of working prototypes in orbit right now, and by 2012 plans to lease entire orbital facilities for $88 million/year (or $18 million for an 2-month stay).

    Also, I'm guessing the cited figure of "$4 million for a three-day stay" doesn't include the cost of getting to orbit in the first place. For a Soyuz flight, that's at least $20 million per person.

    1. Re:Skeptical by swokm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but who's going to pay to enter an inflatable when he could get inside the real thing for the same price?

    2. Re:Skeptical by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      > Yes, but who's going to pay to enter an inflatable when he could get inside the real thing for the same price?

      Huh? What do you mean by "real thing"?

    3. Re:Skeptical by swokm · · Score: 1

      Er... it was a joke. You know, how Bigelow's habs are sort of tough, inflatable fabric as opposed to the traditional "tin can" style.

      You know what ELSE some weirdos could 'enter' that is inflatable... ;) I'm apparently the least funny mofo on the damned planet. :(

      Sigh. I am so depressed now.

    4. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understood your joke immediately. Cheer up.

      Slashdot is a notoriously tough audience. Its hard to tell jokes to geeks becuause their inherent autism causes them to disect gags all the time.

    5. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure he was making fun of the fact that for slashdotters, inflatable is the real thing...

    6. Re:Skeptical by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      The cost is staggering, but hey, there are a helluva lot worse ways to spend 45 million dollars for those that have the resources.

    7. Re:Skeptical by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that the article is talking about bigelow's. Keep in mind that bigelow will sell a module for 100 million (and that was the ba-330) in 2005 money. But the 3 man version is suppose to be in orbit around 2010-2011 and is known as the Galaxy. Bigelow is probably looking to get one of the galaxies attached to the ISS for a year or 2 (you did notice the attempt to allow private enterprise to make use of the ISS). Later, it will be replaced with a BA-330. After that time, they will be leasing AND selling modules, as well as the assembled version (2 ba-330's, 1 galaxy, and an assembly truss.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Skeptical by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Regarding your sig: "Morality is doing the right thing; ethics is doing the right thing even when you know no one is watching you."

      So, we could say that paranoid people are the only people who are ethical by nature :-)

    9. Re:Skeptical by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I guess that's one way of looking at it. By the way, how did you get my email address, are you the CIA again?
      :)

    10. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're going to be buying or leasing one of Robert Bigelow's habs? Bigelow isn't particularly in the space hotel business; he's in the space real estate business. Maybe this is the vehicle they're using.

    11. Re:Skeptical by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      You know what ELSE some weirdos could 'enter' that is inflatable... ;) I'm apparently the least funny mofo on the damned planet. :(

      Oh, hah, sorry, I -totally- missed that joke. ;)

    12. Re:Skeptical by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that the article is talking about bigelow's.

      Actually, that sounds quite possible, especially since Bigelow has stated that he emphatically doesn't want to get into the space hotel business directly, but would rather lease it to somebody else to do so. I would've thought the article would've mentioned something like that, though.

  7. Maybe the just want investors by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just because they don't have a practical idea doesn't mean they can't rip off investors.

    1. Re:Maybe the just want investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny? If that ain't insightful, i dunno what insightful is ;)

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:Bull by qbwiz · · Score: 1

    "Fly me to the moon" is just the headline of the story and the name of a song; it does not, in fact, have anything to do with the location of the hotel. The hotel would probably be built in low earth orbit.

    --
    Ewige Blumenkraft.
  10. You wouldn't believe it, but... by wamerocity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Even with all that money paid, they still have to get stuck on a 3 hour layover on the MIR! What a ripoff!

    --
    "Thank you for using Stop-n-Drop, America's favorite suicide booth since 2008"
    1. Re:You wouldn't believe it, but... by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Worse than that, none of the electrical sockets are compatible. Its worse than travelling to Europe.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  11. Hmm... by zCyl · · Score: 1

    Do they have valet parking?

    1. Re:Hmm... by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Does it have blackjack and hookers?

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Vaporware by Lon+Star · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm surprised how much play this story is getting considering how little evidence there is that this is little more than someone's joke design project for fun. Especially when there is another, more legitimate company like Bigelow Aerospace that also intends on having a private space station by 2012 but can back that up with TWO test modules actually in space and actually has a manufacturing facility.

    I mean, the reporter takes their word for it when they say some American who they can't name is giving them $3 billion. I figure I could got to the same reporter and say someone is giving me a couple billion to build the world's biggest saussage and it will make the headlines the next day.

    Not sure how much competition to Bigelow they really are, and I also have doubts about their $3 billion funding figure. I think we need more proof than their word.

    Bigelow has: - A manufacturing plans currently building the modules for its stations - A corporate structure - Two test modules currently in space - A concrete business plan - More than 100 employees

    Galactic Suite has: - A Web site with nice illustrations. Though its strange title font looks like it was done in Microsoft Paint.

    This seems like little more than a nice Web site and fancy illustrations. Galactic Suite also seems to indicate it would use the Space Shuttle for construction, which would be news to NASA, which plans to put the orbiters in the Smithsonian by 2010.

    Seems like more vaporware to me. I'd rather put my money on Bigelow to build the first private space station.

    Bigelow put up some cool, REAL pictures from space on this page: http://bigelowaerospace.com/out_there/view_photos. php.

    1. Re:Vaporware by swokm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir! I think that a flabbergastingly preposterous accusation! I have seen these resplendently detailed plans with my very own eyes!

      I will be most delighted to share them with you: Behold!

      PS. Please address checks to "My Kool Space Howse", P.O Box...

    2. Re:Vaporware by aquabat · · Score: 1

      I mean, the reporter takes their word for it when they say some American who they can't name is giving them $3 billion. I bet the secret investor is Darl McBride.
      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    3. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same reaction, but the NY Times is pretty careful about sourcing. I took another look, and realized this is a Reuters article, with no author cited. It's included on nytimes.com, though saying "The New York Times reported..." is a little misleading. Reuters reported, nytimes.com posted.

    4. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the timing is rather suspicious, what if the engineering being solved isn't the modules, but the interiors? And they plan to lease the modules from Bigelow? Then suddenly the 2012 opening would make a lot of sense.

    5. Re:Vaporware by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Hello sir,

      My name is Negeroponte. I am the third cousin of our beloved dictator that was deposed recently. I am involved in a secret plot to move his hidden funds of approximately $3 billion (US) out of the country. I would like to invest in your sausage. It sounds truly delicious. If you would simply transfer $200 in the account, whose number I will provide, .....

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    6. Re:Vaporware by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      >Bigelow put up some cool, REAL pictures from space on this page: http://bigelowaerospace.com/out_there/view_photos. php

      Several of the pictures depict a payload plastered with corporate sponsors' logos; did anyone notice that several of these logos are pixelated out?

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    7. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered about that. I had three thoughts. Either an investor that hasn't been disclosed yet, labels from assembly or something like that which might reveal some proprietary information about the capsule design, or most likely, personal items from some of the Bigelow staff they decided not to show off on the internet like family pictures. If you read a little more about the flight, you'll find there were some personal items included.

  14. 2012? by SageMusings · · Score: 4, Insightful

    3 megabucks per passenger would not pay for it even if they had the lift and an orbiting facility. Gosh, 2012? It is going to take longer just to figure out cheaper launch vehicles. Also the first time a rich "astro-tourist" gets killed (1st or 2nd flight), the whole operation sinks.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
  15. Wait... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will they keep the mints from floating off the pillows?

    1. Re:Wait... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's obvious: put the mints underneath the pillows. How they then stop the pillows from floating off the mints is another matter entirely...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    2. Re:Wait... by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Velcro.
      Message ends.

    3. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe put a mint on top of it?

    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will they keep the mints from floating off the pillows?

      It's obvious: put the mints underneath the pillows. How they then stop the pillows from floating off the mints is another matter entirely... Or, if you're a student of this science called physics you'd know that neither the mint nor the pillow would float away unless it was acted on by an outside force. This is a pet peeve of mine when I watch sci-fi shows, because they always seem get weightlessness and microgravity wrong, wrong, wrong. You don't magically float into the air the second gravity is removed, neither do all the untethered objects on the rest of the spaceship.
    5. Re:Wait... by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      They do drift away.

      The whole structure vibrates, because there are several motors whirring all the time. That motion is quite sufficient to set things drifting very slowly.

      Even if the motors were perfectly vibrationless (which is quite impossible) there is a continuous air draft from air conditioning. Loose stuff tends to drift very slowly with the air toward the air conditioning's intake. Loose a pen, a paper clip, a small tool, and chances are in a few hours you'll find it at the air intake.

      Still you're right in that movies often get this wrong (like everything else). Some movies do show things taking off as if they had legs and jumped, which looks just as embarrassingly ridiculous as movie computers, and many, many other movie things.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  16. Re:Bull by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    You forget that the majority of present day space vehicles are in fact built by private sector companies: Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Arianne, Energia and so on. NASA doesn't have factories.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  17. The biggest problem I see with this. by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Okay, I could imagine that *maybe* there are people willing to pay that much to stay in a space hotel. The problem is, what good is having a luxury space hotel suite if you can't hire strippers to dance in it, much less drink champagne in your hot tub with them. Face it folks, besides watching all your friends vomit, weightlessness is no fun.

  18. Vacuumware by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    There, fixed it for ya...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  19. Re:Bull by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    holy crap, they were not even talking about on the moon. They were talking orbital. $3 Billion is not enough to build a hotel, considering the ISS is cost at least 1 BILLION dollars per year to operate. As I've mentioned in another comment, Bigelow Aerospace already has a couple of one-third-size habitat prototypes in orbit right now, and he's stated that he doesn't plan to spend a total of more than $400 million on the project over the next several years.

    Keep in mind that most of the $1.8 billion annual cost of the ISS is spent on space shuttle flight operations. Of course, since the space shuttle is used almost exclusively for the ISS, a good part of the $4 billion a year it costs to keep the shuttles running should probably be added to that as well. In any case, NASA's ISS spending figure isn't a good indicator of how much it would cost to run a for-profit orbital habitat.
  20. Way to spend ! by in2mind · · Score: 1

    What a way to spend money!

    Earn in Earth.Spend in Space !!

    (c) :)

  21. Showers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're only going to be there for three days, why even bother taking a shower at all?

    1. Re:Showers by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      30-mile high club. 'Nuff said.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Showers by Presence2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking geosynchronous orbit club sounded better. Definitely puts a new spin on the phrase "going around the world" with your GF.

  22. why thankyou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah right 2012;

    well i'd like to book a room please, with a fast internet connection so i can go online with duke nukem forever.

  23. I have a story for you... by gr33nlantern · · Score: 1

    This just in!:
    LOLOLOLLLOLOLOLOLL!L!1!1!1!1one1!1!11

    Do they offer free wifi service? =/...

    1. Re:I have a story for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up.

  24. Gideons by Gizah · · Score: 1

    How are they going to stop those bibles floating away? hmm?

    1. Re:Gideons by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Normally, I believe, the Gideon Bible is stuffed into a drawer. I believe that the drawer will keep the Bible in place until someone wants or needs to read it.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  25. Colonizing Mars is not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long term colonization on Mars is impossible without major terraforming, and we are no where near able to do that. http://www.philforhumanity.com/Terraforming_Mars.h tml

  26. BEARD! by orangesunglasses · · Score: 1

    This is just like the news stories that 'predict' that we will all have walking robots in our homes in a years time.

  27. Try Clicking On 'Blog' by SilentOneNCW · · Score: 1

    You get a username/password dialog box. WTF?

  28. I think Roald Dahl already addressed this. by Shag · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Vermicious Knid overlords.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:I think Roald Dahl already addressed this. by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

      HAHA!

      I was going to bring up the Vermicious Knids, but you beat me, and did it in true /. fashion. Cheers!

    2. Re:I think Roald Dahl already addressed this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't welcome you. SCRAM!

  29. what are guests paying for? by 3seas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eight weeks of training at a james bond style camp on a tropical island.

    and while up in space for three days...
    During that time guests would see the sun rise 15 times a day...

    costing $4 million for a three-day stay.

    and then there is a bill correction afterward..

    15 sunrises a day for three days = 45 sunrises.

    I'm sorry sir, according to our corrected calculations you were up there for more than 3 days...

    45 days to be correct.

    At 4 million per three days that comes to $60 million dollars.

    here is you after bill of $56 million.

    Now its beginning to make financial since...

  30. First Space HOTEL, then Universities, AWESOME !! by posys · · Score: 2, Funny
    The sooner the better and this little room in the sky will give people a healthy perspective on the BIG PICTURE, and how we each need each other, how beautiful the earth is, how we each need the same things, and how similar each culture is.

    This small step will help open the flood gates similar to when ships set sail in the maritime revolution, and bars and inns sprang up in new ports all over the world.

    We talk about this and how ROBOTS will soon be doing ALL our work ushering in what we call

    The Age of Recreation via the Emancipation of Humanity from the Machinery of Economy via the "ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY"

    read more here: http://teaminfinity.com/ROBO_SPACE_HOTEL

    We need your help to make it happen in our lifetimes... Talk it up, spread the great news/memes

    --
    The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
  31. Just announced- the MC of the grand opening wil be by jconley · · Score: 3, Funny

    DJ Ruby Rhod!

  32. About time by proxy318 · · Score: 1

    Will I be able to ride my hoverboard there?

    --
    Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  33. It's very cold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very cold to shower in space.

  34. I believe you to be wrong by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    They are putting up a hotel, not putting up a building. Almost certainly, it will use the bigelow modules. Roughly, Bob Bigelow is selling westerners who can actually buy the modules what to use these for. Bob will also have 1 hotel up there, but would like to see some competition up there. If more groups announce that they are building hotels up there AND on the moon, then private enterprise will rush in to fill the void. As I said on another posting, I believe that private enterprise will be on the moon by 2015.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. Funny thing happened on the way to the moon by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Large number of folks back in the 60's believed that we would never survive a landing on the moon. Many of them believed that it was 10' of dust. So a number of common folks who fancied themselves as experts were announcing that we could not land on the moon. After we did, then they said that it must have been a trick. I am guessing that long after we have started a colony on mars, ppl like you will declare that it was all a trick.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  36. this is generating billions in jobs by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Here is a suggestion. Since this is creating lots of jobs (with many more to come), you could get rich off of this AND do the colonizing of the gobi.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  37. 4 million? by rdean400 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sheesh, where's PriceLine when you need it?

    1. Re:4 million? by azander · · Score: 1

      I believe Orbits will have better deals on this one.

  38. Timewave/Mayan Long Count nuts can relax finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timewavers and Tzolkiners can breathe a sigh of relief as this clearly signals a major transition for the human race from merely exploring outer-space to actually living in it. This will be the moment our planet leaves the starting gate. Not the end, but instead the beginning of a new world... The line goes flat because it's just a small section the greater whole. The count ends because the next phase is beginning.

  39. Somewhat OT by noradninja · · Score: 1

    So, is there a reason this has not been tagged getyourasstomars yet?

  40. Don't do it! by Mr.+Vage · · Score: 0

    Colonizing Mars will lead to Hell on Earth!

  41. ISS orbits at 5 miles - five mile high club ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume there are a few members already

    1. Re:ISS orbits at 5 miles - five mile high club ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 miles times 5000 feet is only 25,000 feet (and change). Last time I checked, ISS wasn't in danger of being hit by airliners!

    2. Re:ISS orbits at 5 miles - five mile high club ? by Shnyzx · · Score: 1

      Considering that the "boarder" of space is set at the 62 mile mark, ISS is considerably higher. The ISS Sits at a nice 215 mi orbit (or 347 km).

  42. 5 years? Bullshit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll believe that when they get the first pieces of equipment up there. In the mean
    time, I'll chalk that time up to the usual corporate smoke blowing.

  43. economics by abes · · Score: 1

    I think this is one of the first steps for a human presence in space. In many ways it follows how international airflight became economical. With that said, there are a couple of issues.

    Firstly, unlike international flights, there is no ultimate functional destination (yet). The only reason to be there currently is because you have money to waste. Other business ventures need to be set up to create a supportable ecosystem. Two other businesses that may be sensible would be: research, though getting the government grants to do so would be difficult, so the research would have to have some economical return; and possible mining on the moon (hydrogen).

    Longer term, I think it is worthwhile of thinking of the universe being a very large tappable energy source. Large enough to be considered infinite for now. The big issues with this are: (1) how difficult is a particular resource to harvest, (2) how long will it take, (3) can it converted to energy easily, or must it be transferred first to be processed. The last point is important, because the harvesting shuttles themselves could in theory power themselves on these resources. This could extend their distance and speed.

    Secondly, zero-g living will only be fun for so long. You can already experience it without going up. While (AFAIK) we still don't have any anti-gravity engines, it is still possible to simulate gravity using centripetal force. Unfortunately, if I remember correctly, this requires a rather large ring rotating at a decent velocity. This will also solve the issue of the toliets.

  44. $500k for macadamia nuts? by mikeasu · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to see how much they charge for the in-room bar...

  45. Typical Scenario... by raftpeople · · Score: 1

    Hotel Employee: "Hello and welcome to the Space Hotel, are you checking in?"
    Guest: "Yes, name is Wilson"
    Employee: "Ok great, let me find you on the computer, this will just take a second {clickity clickity clack clack click clack...)"
    Employee: "Hmmm, and your reservation was for today?"
    Guest: "Yes"
    Employee: "Ok, hold on, (click clack clickity click...)"
    Employee: "Hm. Uh, how do you spell Wilson?"
    Guest: "W I L S O N"
    Employee: "Yes, that's what I was trying, but I just don't see it. Do you have your confirmation code?"
    Guest: "Sure, let me dig through some stuff and get it...ok, it's 178QXT534"
    Employee: "Great, let me bring that up...(click click click clickity clack clack click...)"
    Employee: "I'm not finding that either, are you sure that's the code?"
    Guest: "Yes, I printed this off your website before I left, see"
    Employee: "Yes that's the code, but it just doesn't seem to be in our system. I'm sorry sir."
    Guest: "So what do we do?"
    Employee: "Well we are completely booked up, unless you have a reservation I can't give you a room."
    Guest: "But...I just flew 20,000 miles...FROM EARTH...THERE IS NO WHERE ELSE TO STAY!"
    Employee: "I can probably sneak you in next week, IF you are willing to take the smoking room junior suite with 2 doubles instead of a queen. This room does not have a wet bar, but under the conditions, I would recommend taking it." ...

  46. Bout time! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Can we PLEASE spend some of the money we are currently wasting in Iraq on something like this?

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  47. Artificial by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    We need artificial gravity, dammit!

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  48. Just one problem.... by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

    ....what to do about the vermicious knids?

    1. Re:Just one problem.... by longbot · · Score: 1

      One word: airlock.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  49. Re:Objection! by AdmiralLawman · · Score: 1

    Move along, nothing to see here people. Blarg.

  50. Posys did you cause a /. DDoS for teaminfinity.com by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    Yes you did, it is all your fault, they will thank you tomorrow, I will thank you today for something that pricked my curiosity.

    Yes, I am human; Therefor, my curiosity may get me in to unknown situations sometimes,
    and fycked at other times (some sort of possibly pleasurable quantum effect), but it
    will never intentionally get me killed or stuck in a wall.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  51. The original article--no registration required by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 2, Informative

    This NY Times article came from Reuters.
    Here is the original article:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL10 89156420070810?pageNumber=2&sp=true
    No registration required to see this.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  52. Includedn costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The package includes shuttle trips to and fro plus an 18-week training program on a Caribbean island. Details surrounding certain creature comforts and necessities are still being ironed out."

    Great Deal

  53. Re:economics ...think vegas by ItsLenny · · Score: 1

    I mean come on what was vegas... a big boring desert now look at it

    we need a casino resort on the moon... (or just floating in orbit.. whatever)

    although working there would kinda suck.. but whatever

    --
    ----------
    Trying to fix or change something only guarantees and perpetuates it's existence
  54. Re:economics ...think vegas by abes · · Score: 1

    For Vegas a large number of people were needed. Even if the initial costs go down, only a very small number of people can afford it. Which is fine, as I'm assuming they're not building it very large. But the problem is that there isn't going to be much to do when you are up there. It's an experience, but not a destination. I doubt too many people will return for another time to watch the earth go by.

    So, yes, a casino, restaurant, and bar will be needed. But those won't really be possible until some gravity can be established. Not just because zero-g makes everything very difficult (which is a large enough reason), but also for health reasons (like loss of bone-mass issues).

  55. Disgusting by g0at · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have high death tolls and squalid conditions in developing nations, yet American billionaires have their heads so far up their asses that they'd rather piss about their wealth on an esoteric toy of value to a statistically negligible number of people. Sad.

    b

    1. Re:Disgusting by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      I understand the emotional grounds for your viewpoint, but I think you need to factor in how the money would be spent before you jump to conclusions.

      Would these decadent billionaires be spending their money investing in infrastructure in developing nations? There's little to no return on their investment, so that's unlikely. Maybe a philanthropic few of them would send money for medical supplies or food, which will help temporarily alleviate the symptoms, but it won't cure the disease. That's assuming the money or supplies weren't simply stolen by warlords or funneled into the accounts of petty dictators. If the wealthy have those inclinations, they'll probably donate money as well as splurging on their own space vacation. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have donated a whole hell of a lot more money to charity than I ever could.

      What happens when these people pay their megabucks to spend a couple days in space? It creates jobs, high paying jobs. It fosters interest in the commercialization of space, which creates more interest in science and math among students, if for no other reason than there are high paying jobs in those sectors. Advances in those areas pass into other technologies, and those technologies become commodities, and those commodities become necessities.

      I won't deny that there are problems with the distribution of wealth in the developed world, or claim that I'm indifferent to the suffering of poorer nations, but in the long term these people throwing money away on decadent pleasures will do more for all of humanity than whatever meager charitable contributions you or I could make.

    2. Re:Disgusting by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      We could waste all our resources trying to feed and keep alive the people in developing nations -- thereby encouraging them to have even more children, who will need even more supporting.

      Or, we could reach for the stars and bring back some asteroids which will do so much more for the people of Earth than the sum total of all the charitable contributions ever donated.

      I know which one I'd bet on, and I'm glad to see people with far more resources than me agreeing. You seem rather bitter; remember that you attract more flies with honey than vinegar -- that is, if you want people to donate to your charities...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:Disgusting by g0at · · Score: 1

      We could waste all our resources trying to feed and keep alive the people in developing nations -- thereby encouraging them to have even more children, who will need even more supporting.

      Maybe we should use the money to start slaughtering existent populations in the developing world then, instead, and nip this problem in the bud.

      Or, we could reach for the stars and bring back some asteroids which will do so much more for the people of Earth than the sum total of all the charitable contributions ever donated.

      Citation/evidence?

      -b

    4. Re:Disgusting by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should use the money to start slaughtering existent populations in the developing world then, instead, and nip this problem in the bud.

      You so don't want to learn the lesson about honey and vinegar, do you? Well, your bitterness has convinced me not to donate to any charities you're involved in, for now. (This is not a threat, or a challenge, or an insult; it's simply my judgment as to where to spend my resources. You seem to be charity-minded, but your tone belies something different altogether.)

      Citation/evidence?

      Sure, here is is:

      Still, if an average asteroid had several trillion dollars in precious metals, which is entirely possible, according to Tumlinson in a 2000 exchange, that lode could be used to underwrite, conservatively, several hundred billion dollars for projects of various kinds. That potential for good is from one average nickel-iron asteroid.

      [...]

      Projects that might be initiated under such an extraterrestrial plan are varied. The establishment of a modern healthcare system throughout Africa, now being devastated by various diseases, including AIDS, might be one. That continent will have strong political systems only after healthy national populations exist. Another possibility would be an international program to clean badly polluted sites left from the old Soviet empire. Such an effort would lift a huge burden off the backs of maturing democracies in the area, allowing them to allocate resources to other areas. The Middle East is the home of the three great monotheistic religions of the world--and increasingly a viciously unruly place. If there were a financial or development component to a future peace settlement there, it could be underwritten by wealth from asteroids. All of these suggestions are international in character, as befits the source of the wealth being tapped, and all aim to give people realistic hope for a better immediate future.

      So, no, the idea isn't to kill off the population. The idea is to help them, without going about it all short-sighted and destroying ourselves in the process.

      Sorry about your fish.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:Disgusting by g0at · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the passage. That's an interesting philosophy; I didn't realise that harvesting asteroids from space was in the cards, but it's an interesting idea.

      Nonetheless, the examples given of what to do with the proceeds of such wealth included rehabilitating populations in Africa. How is this end-game different from "wast[ing] all our resources trying to feed and keep alive the people in developing nations -- thereby encouraging them to have even more children, who will need even more supporting"?

      -ben

    6. Re:Disgusting by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless, the examples given of what to do with the proceeds of such wealth included rehabilitating populations in Africa. How is this end-game different from "wast[ing] all our resources trying to feed and keep alive the people in developing nations -- thereby encouraging them to have even more children, who will need even more supporting"?

      Well, on the surface, you're right -- the two look to be about the same.

      However, the former course limits our abilities to get to the stars, and if we waste enough resources helping others, we will never get off the planet. The latter course achieves both ends. Yes, more people may die in the short term with the latter course; progress is never easy.

      Another goal to be spending towards is nanotechnology. I'm not sure which is preferable as a first step -- achieving nanotech, or harvesting one asteroid. Both unlock untold riches, and allow us to do exponentially more good.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have an overpriced launch system and shitty orbital facilities, yet third-world beggars have their heads so far up their asses that they'd rather hinder the progress of the human race than contribute to it. also sad.

    8. Re:Disgusting by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'm with the vaporware claims on this.

      Secondly, I'd rather see billionaires spending their money creating high paying, high tech jobs building stuff in space than buying hookers, drugs, wigs, and contrived and boring talk or reality tv shows.

      Third, you can throw all the money you want at the problem spots in the world, but until someone figures out how to fix the incredibly messed up politics of those places, most of that money will continue to be used to buy more guns/diamonds/sex slaves/burquas. Sure you can just buy food and medicine, but the dictators/warlords/extremist sect leaders only prefer money over food and medicine as wealth to distribute in support of their positions because money is more portable and easily traded for guns/drugs/hookers/hitmen.

  56. Re:Objection! by chitchat98765 · · Score: 0

    i beg your pardon? outer space belongs to all earth people. it is not to be bought by Saudis or Japanese or anyone else. the resources are for all mankind, not for personal profit.

  57. What the Mayans really said by crmartin · · Score: 1

    2012? Shit, they'll be using some other kind of calendar by then, we don't need to go any further.

  58. Re:Objection! by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

    You can object as much as you want. This is 21 century, people are greedy. It is like the conquest of America, the only difference is that there are no natives to exterminate. The first one to get there the first one to profit from it. Space is up for grabs, and the private business got their money on it.

  59. 80 minutes? I call BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anybody else noticed that the figures don't add up? The article says the hotel will go around the world in 80 minutes and guests will see 15 sunrises a day. 15 times 80 minutes = 20 hours.

    Also, orbiting in 80 minutes is physically impossible for any object orbiting that freely orbits the earth under gravity. Even if something could somehow orbit at surface level without encountering atmospheric drag, it would take 84 minutes. In principle you could maintain an 80 minute orbit by continuously using thrusters to push a satellite toward the earth, but that would surely be prohibitively expensive.

    I suspect that the figure of 15 sunrises per day is really based on the intended orbit (reasonable for low earth orbit) and the figure of 80 minutes is a lie that was spread because it sounded catchy.

  60. Re:80 minutes? I call BS. by Shnyzx · · Score: 1

    The numbers may not add up, but you are forgetting that the sunrise doesn't just happen at one spot on the Earth. While they are orbiting the earth the sunrise will move 16 minutes infront of its previous position. This will give a total time of 96 minutes between sunrises, AKA 15 a day. (Actually anything close or a little less that and you'll still only see 15 a day with a little extrat "day time")