Slashdot Mirror


D2 Updates, Text Message Notifcation

A few quick notes on some recent code updates. The smaller function is that we've added text messaging stuff for phones. If you visit the messages page (you must be logged in) you can define your cell phone's email address, and get notifications sent to it. The more interesting update is for Discussion2 users (turn it on on any article page). There is an option now to restrict page sizes and you will retrieve comments by score. This means you can configure your Slashdot to return smaller, more bandwidth friendly pages that you can expand without loading fresh pages. Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.

164 comments

  1. who cares...? by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Troll

    you can define your cel [sic] phone's email address, and get notifications sent to it.

    Does anyone actually care about their messages beyond "those things I let expire or occasionally delete"?

    1. Re:who cares...? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use slash messages to keep track of replies to my posts. ..so I can have something to reply back to and whore more mod points :)

    2. Re:who cares...? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Brian, this is your boss. You spend too much time on Slashdot as it is.

  2. Texting in US is Ripoff by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The other day my wireless provider sent me a text message saying "It currently costs $0.10 to receive text messages. Would you like to upgrade?" I mean, damn guys, thanks for the message, ya know?

    1. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by ZombieWomble · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This was something that intrigued me when I was talking with an American who was visitng - do you have some way to regulate how you receive texts/who you receive texts from? I can understand the rationale behind paying to receive a phone call (obviously, you can choose to reject the call if you don't want to pay the price). But over here at least, texts just arrive - doesn't this (theoretically) make it possible to bomb someone with vast amounts of texts and drive up their bills without them having a meaningful way to protect themselves?

      I'm sure there's a simple solution to this somewhere which I'm overlooking, but having an aspect of a person's billing completely outside their control seems rather bizarre.

    2. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by stinerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      With all carriers that I know of, there is no way to stop unwanted text messages, and yes, we have to pay for each one.

      AFAIK, if there is a consistent pattern of abuse, you can call your carrier and they might make concessions. Similarly, the FCC and your state attorney general will be interested in text message spamming. I don't see how this would stop someone from outside the US from simply spamming the crap out of us. Similarly, I can just use the SMS option on most modern IM clients these days.

      Yeah, the state of cell phone usage in general in the US is shit.

    3. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

      The carrier I use, Rogers in Canada, works thusly -- each text I send to another phone user is $0.10. Receiving a text from another human costs me nothing, but costs them. However, if I receive an automatic text from a web site or some other non-human, then I pay the $0.10. I have chosen to pay an additional few bucks for essentially unlimited outgoing texts (thus negating the sending cost), but it still costs me to receive Google calendar SMS reminders, etc (the non-human automated stuff).

      So, in other words (and assuming that mine is like most other North American carriers) -- no, you can't "bomb" someone by texting them yourself, but you may be able to do it using one of those "send a text message" web sites or whatever, depending upon the recipient carrier's policy. I have to believe that there's some kind of checks in place for this.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    4. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how this would stop someone from outside the US from simply spamming the crap out of us. Similarly, I can just use the SMS option on most modern IM clients these days. Most (all by now?) US carriers also provide a nice SMS email gateway.

      You can SMS-spam someone through the Internet, for free, with little danger of retaliation.
    5. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by BMonger · · Score: 1

      I've only ever been billed for outgoing text messages, never for incoming.

    6. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      I believe with Sprint they let you know that you got a message, but you have to accept payment before you can view it. I haven't used it enough to know for sure.

    7. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Ant+P. · · Score: 0

      Heh, it's not just the US. I get SMS spam in the UK from the phone company. And yes, I have to pay for it.

    8. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by smallfries · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never seen a UK contract where you pay for incoming texts. Who are you with, and which tarrif are you on?

      (So I know who not to change to next time)

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    9. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Skater · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can get them to put a block on (at least with Verizon). The only problem is that the sender never knows that you didn't receive the message.

    10. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just for mentioning the phrases "American", "phone call", "pay the price", "bomb someone", "protect themselves", and "outside their control", you have been added to the Department of Fatherland Security watchlists. All of your finances, foreign or otherwise, will be monitored closely (in San Francisco) for any corroborating tendrils of threatening intent on your part.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    11. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      I'm also on Rogers, I don't think I ever payed to receive computer texts, but now I have it just sending to my 416XXXXXXX@pcs.rogers.com address (which used to be free until 2 years ago, Rogers decided to put a 'spam filter' feature on it, that I needed to pay-per-message [by replying via text] or $5/month to bypass)

    12. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure, because I am too cheap to use SMS. But when I looked in to it a couple of years ago, you could have the phone company either block ALL SMS or NO SMS. I am also surprised this hasn't widely been used for griefing.

      Hopefully, things are better today. But I'm still cheap, and I don't use SMS. My carrier actually increased prices recently.

      The future is now... in Korea anyway.

    13. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by horatio · · Score: 1

      If you call Sprint customer service, they told me and will likely tell you there is no way to block SMS except all incoming or all outgoing or all of both, and offer you a texting "plan" for some monthly cost.

      However, if you (customer) log into their website and go the area that lets you /send/ a text message (My online tools->SMS Messaging->Settings & Preferences), there is an option to block (up to 50?) numbers from sending you text messages. How well it works I really don't know.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    14. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by jakepmatthews · · Score: 1

      You buy a cell phone and cellular service to get a wireless telephone. But if you pay extra you can turn it in to a wireless telegraph!

    15. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint has unlimited text for $5/mo.

    16. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Who on earth are you with, Even O2 (the only people worse than t-mobile) don't charge for incoming texts.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    17. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by KTorak · · Score: 1

      Most carriers should allow you to block either all messages or specific numbers. Granted Sprint doesn't make it easy to find the option on their website, I did find it and found out how to block ALL texting or just certain numbers.

      --
      Kyle
    18. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by pppppppman · · Score: 1

      Awesome, I thought I was the only one that called them that...

    19. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Wireless telegraph? I'm starting to get a mental image of some spoiled teenage girl sending this to her boyfriend, tapping maniacally on her phone in Morse code:

      HI STOP DO YOU WANT TO MEET AT THE MALL QUERY K THX STOP
      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    20. Re:Texting in US is Ripoff by renehollan · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes.

      I used to work for a company in Redmond *cough* that provides instant messaging and alerts via SMS, siphoning some of the carrier revenue that this generates.

      To avoid large amounts of *unexpected* SPAM over a newly created gateway from their IM clients or alert triggers to a cell phone subscriber, they require a new customer to accept (by responding to an initial SMS message) that they are willing to receive them.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  3. "Sucker!" by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.

    Ah yes, insulting your readership. I see that Slashdot's grasp of the finer points of customer relations remains as firm as ever...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:"Sucker!" by jrumney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just tried it again after finding it lacking a couple of months ago, and no, still no way to sort by score. So I guess I'll keep sucking the traditional interface for now.

    2. Re:"Sucker!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question... is D2 the massively incompatable IE6 version? I'm afraid to turn it on again since I'm stuck with IE6 here at work and would like to have something to read during my coffee breaks! Assuming I'm correct, I love being slammed by /. for reasons outside of my control (and frankly, is caused by lazy programming on your part guys). I'm sure I'll get flamed pretty hard for this, so puttin on some AC goodness.

      And don't give me the "IE6 is too old to be worth supporting crap", Microsoft tried the same thing with DX10 and Vista, and both of those arguments are as lame as it gets.

    3. Re:"Sucker!" by fm6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It only took a few minutes for you to lose 3 point (counting your karma bonus) to moderators misusing the flamebait and troll mods. You were expecting courtesy on Slashdot?

    4. Re:"Sucker!" by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Informative

      So now I'm a sucker because I can't use D2 at work?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:"Sucker!" by rufo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just tried it again after finding it lacking a couple of months ago, and no, still no way to sort by score. So I guess I'll keep sucking the traditional interface for now. Huh? I just hit Prefs and there's an option for Highest Score First...
      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    6. Re:"Sucker!" by Chapium · · Score: 1

      Lighten up

    7. Re:"Sucker!" by jrumney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have that ticked, it works on the traditional interface, and now that I've posted that complaint it seems to be working on this discussion. But on other discussions I see things like:

      Score 3
      Score 2
      Score 4
      Score 3
      Score 4

      So I'd assumed that it didn't apply to the new discussion system. Maybe what I'm seeing is a bug, but still, am I a "sucker" for not using an obviously buggy new comment system that is clearly marked as a test?

    8. Re:"Sucker!" by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.
      Ah yes, insulting your readership. I see that Slashdot's grasp of the finer points of customer relations remains as firm as ever... Slashdot is based on ad revenue. We, the readers, are the product(*) and the ad servers are the customers.

      * - With the notable exception of subscribers.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    9. Re:"Sucker!" by crymeph0 · · Score: 1

      My /. gets 50 comments to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    10. Re:"Sucker!" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If you are a subscriber then you are a customer. If you are not then you are just a user.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:"Sucker!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Taco is just baiting the real discussion here, which is this:

      I'll run D2 when it works without javascript precisely because I'm not a sucker!

    12. Re:"Sucker!" by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yeah, I agree with you. I have my display set to show comments +3 and above; because with karma bonuses and bad moderation, comments 2 and below are often a waste of breath. I want to read *all* the comments that have actually been moderated at least once upwards.

      Can't do that with the new system. You can say "highest ranked comments get priority showing up on my screen", but that's not what I want. if a story has 40 +5 comments, I don't want to set it to only show me +5's inadvertently by switching to the new system's threshold. I want to see the +3's too.

      ~X

      --
      sig?
    13. Re:"Sucker!" by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pref is there, but it does nothing for me with D2, never has. Under d2, threads are always ordered by oldest first. Very annoying. This is the only thing that keeps me from using D2.

      --
      No Comment.
    14. Re:"Sucker!" by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      You can have the system ignore karma bonuses, if you're worried about them. Check your user preferences.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    15. Re:"Sucker!" by iago-vL · · Score: 1

      I'll run D2 when it works without javascript precisely because I'm not a sucker!

      My thoughts exactly! I'm surprised nobody said it earlier.

    16. Re:"Sucker!" by nobodyman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jeez, man, lighten up. I think he was just kidding around. Anyone thinking otherwise is a sucker.

    17. Re:"Sucker!" by hublan · · Score: 1

      Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.


      Ah yes, insulting your readership. I see that Slashdot's grasp of the finer points of customer relations remains as firm as ever...

      You'll get over it.
      --
      My spoon is too big.
    18. Re:"Sucker!" by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we're a product, we should be productive. But we're not, because we waste too much time on Slashdot!

    19. Re:"Sucker!" by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      I actually just saw that today. Might fiddle with it. But, still, if I set karmabonus:off and show me +2 and above comments, I'm going to get a lot of crap that's posted at +1 and moderated up once.

        I dunno, it's worth playing with.

      --
      sig?
    20. Re:"Sucker!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that your grasp of the finer points of humor, (as well as the moderators who got you up to +5 Insightful) remains as firm as ever...

    21. Re:"Sucker!" by ozbird · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about some consistent naming standards? There's no "Discussion2" or "D2" option in preferences - it's "Slashdot's New Discussion System Testing".

    22. Re:"Sucker!" by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Yes. D2 works with any browser based on Gecko, Webkit, or KHTML. It will fail on Trident based browsers (IE, Maxthon, etc) because Slashdot's too lazy to fix it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    23. Re:"Sucker!" by mce · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'd like to use D2, but this one thing keeps me from doing it. Maybe the suckers implementing the site can finally get this fixed after so many months of working on D2 instead of calling their users suckers. Something as simple as this can't be that hard to get right, now, can it?

    24. Re:"Sucker!" by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're an awful speller. You misspelled "standards" as "Gecko, Webkit, or KHTML".

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    25. Re:"Sucker!" by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I heard, Opera does a better job than all four at rendering standards based stuff. They all have their little quirks... Trident just has more than most.

      But then I notice in the source code for this very compose message screen:

      <!--[if IE]><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen, projection" href="//images.slashdot.org/iestyles.css?T_2_5_0_1 70"><![endif]-->

      The perfect opportunity to make all the hacks they need (or better yet, not apply those hacks to IE7)

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    26. Re:"Sucker!" by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he didn't mention Opera in his post. I wish he did--then it would be an even sillier misspelling. Somewhat like, "Your TV station only supports Magnavox, Sony, Panasonic, JVC, and RCA TV sets...not Toshiba!". Except TV sets actually abide by standards.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    27. Re:"Sucker!" by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      He = Me. And not including Opera was an oversight.

      And I explicitly avoided using the word "standards" because Slashdot doesn't work in a few standards compliant browsers.

      Like Lynx.

      It should also be noted that due to the simplicity of Slashdot's interface, they'd actually have to go out of their way to make it not work in Internet Explorer.

      I don't care much, I only browse Slashdot in Firefox anyway. Although I do have issues with every now and again needing to close and re-open Firefox so that all the Javascript-crap actually works.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    28. Re:"Sucker!" by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Okay, you have me there--it should decompose better. And you have a point about the Javascript. D2 actually crashes Safari on me sometimes, but since I'm using the Safari 3 beta, I'm not quite sure who to blame.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  4. sucker? by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.
    or is stuck running IE. (Remember us, that lonely lost majority of the internet?)
    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:sucker? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or use the Slashdotter Firefox Plugin, which isn't compatible with D2. It's ability to hide threads I'm not interested in far outweighs any advantages of the new layout. I also like the reply (no more typing in <blockquote>) feature, and various AJAX features.

    2. Re:sucker? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      or is stuck running IE. (Remember us, that lonely lost majority of the internet?) Don't worry, I won't forget any zombie in my bot army.
      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:sucker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also like the reply (no more typing in <blockquote>) feature, and various AJAX features. You know that D2 has a 'quote' button which generates the blockquote (or actually just <quote>) for you? You know that D2 loads comments via AJAX?
    4. Re:sucker? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Or use the Slashdotter Firefox Plugin, which isn't compatible with D2. It's ability to hide threads I'm not interested in far outweighs any advantages of the new layout. I also like the reply (no more typing in <blockquote>) feature, and various AJAX features.

      What do you mean, incompatible?

      I seem to be running D2, and I have Slashdotter enabled...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    5. Re:sucker? by TREE · · Score: 1

      Some of us loyal long-term readers still use text mode browsers. (elinks) As long as you think about support for mobile browsers, keep us in mind, too. :)

    6. Re:sucker? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm using D2 on Firefox on WinXP and Ubuntu 7.04. I haven't noticed the quote button. Or any other buttons, for that matter.

      Come to think of it, some nice icons in the text box would be nice.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    7. Re:sucker? by internewt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The ability to colapse a whole thread appeared on this slashdot 2.0 ajax interface thing for a while. It didn't seem to be the best implementation (IIRC), but it kinda worked.

      Did you used to be a usenetter by any chance? Thats where I picked up a desire to be able to kill a whole thread. Laugh all you like, but I used to like Netscape 4's news reader, and like a lot of usenet clients it could ignore threads. If a thread turned into a flame fest (that you've seen before), or just wasn't interesting, OT etc., you could just ignore the whole thread, and new messages in that thread would be marked as read.

      The ability to ignore a whole thread, or from a point downwards would be nice on slashdot. Once you've been here for a while you start to notice that a lot of discussions are very similar: they follow the same patterns of posts and ideas that have been talked about a million times. If whole threads could be ignored more easily by /. users, it might mean that mod points get used more towards the end of discussions (which often have insightful gems of comments that get overlooked because either a mod has run out of points by the time they get to the end of the page, or they've moved on to a newer article).

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    8. Re:sucker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm using D2 on Firefox on WinXP and Ubuntu 7.04. I haven't noticed the quote button. Click "Reply to This". It's down there next to "Preview" and "Submit".
    9. Re:sucker? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Enabling it is one thing, actually working is another. It doesn't take a lot of change to the Slashdot HTML to break Slashdotter.

    10. Re:sucker? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Did you used to be a usenetter by any chance? Thats where I picked up a desire to be able to kill a whole thread.
      Indeed I was. Though my wanting to be able to collapse the parts of an info tree that I'm not interested in goes back to my using ThinkTank.
    11. Re:sucker? by crumley · · Score: 1

      WFM. Which parts do not work for you?

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    12. Re:sucker? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      The ability to ignore a whole thread, or from a point downwards would be nice on slashdot. An NNTP interface would be nice on slashdot. But I guess we're stuck with whatever scraps they throw us now and then.
      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    13. Re:sucker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "Preview" button you talk about?

    14. Re:sucker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's built into D2. Just click on the title (top left of post. Just above name, left of score) for the subject and it should collapse the thread.

      (in this case "Re:sucker?" )

  5. Not an exclusive or, of course by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.

    or is stuck running IE. (Remember us, that lonely lost majority of the internet?)
    Obviously, that's not an exclusive or you're using there. One could argue that it's redundant. After all if B implies A, then asserting A is the same as asserting A or B. (Do not mod his post redundant, however. That's not what I mean. I'm just making a joke.)
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Not an exclusive or, of course by asliarun · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously, that's not an exclusive or you're using there. One could argue that it's redundant. After all if B implies A, then asserting A is the same as asserting A or B. (Do not mod his post redundant, however. That's not what I mean. I'm just making a joke.) Dude, let it go. GP was just trying to be a karma OR.
  6. Things I don't like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Things I don't like:
    - the floating widget floats over other things. I want to put it in the left margin and it must not float up above the menu, but stay below the Services entries.
    - there still is no way to "close" a thread or to easily skip to the next top-level thread. when someone (usually an early poster) posts some flamebait comment it is very difficult to find the next top-level comment. There should be a [+] entry in the title bar of each comment where one can close all replies to that comment.

    1. Re:Things I don't like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just click that small [/] box in the top right to fix the location of the box, I think you'll have to do it a few times because it skips around the page to other locations it could be. Not exactly drag-and-drop eh?

    2. Re:Things I don't like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be moved to different locations, including a new one I see now for the first time: sticky at the top. I think I'll leave it there.
      But I don't understand why it hovers over the menu when put in the left margin.

    3. Re:Things I don't like by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Thresholds. In D1 I don't have to think about at what level replies get hidden. The just do. Now I have to constantly work the slider because its a number rather than a rule based approach.

      D2 is teh suck.

    4. Re:Things I don't like by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I guess just setting abbreviated to none emulates D1 behavior, so I guess that solves the root of my complaint.

  7. Mobile Browsing by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2

    Is there a URL other than slashdot.org to use when browsing on a phone or handheld device? My phone doesn't seem to handle slashdot very well.

    1. Re:Mobile Browsing by Reapman · · Score: 2, Informative

      go to "slashdot.org/palm" thats what I use on my Treo 680.

    2. Re:Mobile Browsing by bagofcrap · · Score: 1

      Create an account + Log in

      Goto your preferences page, goto Homepage
      Check Simple Design, Low Bandwidth, and No Icons

      Not as good as before the site redesign, but still better than the default.

      Unfortunately, D2 just doesn't really work for me. Even if they make D2 the default, I hope I can continue using D1 as my default with a settable preference.

    3. Re:Mobile Browsing by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1
  8. Plenty of other URLs by benhocking · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could try google.com, freerepublic.com, dailykos.com, etc. There are millions more to choose from! ;)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  9. First line of posts.... by PadRacerExtreme · · Score: 1

    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.
    Or anyone that doesn't want to always see the first line of troll posts (did I really need to read the first line of the troll about horses mating? I don't even want to post a link to it.....)
    --
    Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.
  10. Closing a thread by benhocking · · Score: 4, Informative

    there still is no way to "close" a thread or to easily skip to the next top-level thread. when someone (usually an early poster) posts some flamebait comment it is very difficult to find the next top-level comment. There should be a [+] entry in the title bar of each comment where one can close all replies to that comment.
    There is a way: click on the title to close it and all replies to that comment. Click on it again to open it back up.
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Closing a thread by tepples · · Score: 0

      there still is no way to "close" a thread or to easily skip to the next top-level thread. when someone (usually an early poster) posts some flamebait comment it is very difficult to find the next top-level comment. There should be a [+] entry in the title bar of each comment where one can close all replies to that comment. There is a way: click on the title to close it and all replies to that comment. Click on it again to open it back up. That closes a reply, not its (Score:-1) parent.
    2. Re:Closing a thread by benhocking · · Score: 1

      That closes a reply, not its (Score:-1) parent.
      That is done by clicking on the title of its (Score:-1) parent. I suppose I don't understand what you mean by "that".
      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    3. Re:Closing a thread by tepples · · Score: 1

      That is done by clicking on the title of its (Score:-1) parent. The (Score:-1) parent does not appear at all on my machine. Or should I be browsing with the bar between "abbreviated" and "hidden" dragged down all the way?
    4. Re:Closing a thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not very intuitive. Other systems use a box with a [-] or [+] to indicate an exploded/collapsed view.

  11. Someday soon by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

    I await the day soon when slashcode becomes sentient, and the first words out of its mouth will be

    "Hallo Wurld"

    as it still won't have spellcheck.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Someday soon by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      as it still won't have spellcheck. I don't see why they'd waste their time, given that Firefox will spell check for you anyway.

    2. Re:Someday soon by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I hate server-side spell check. If you want spellcheck it should be the client that does it. That allows customization and control.

    3. Re:Someday soon by deniable · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it would be "First Post." I'm getting a disturbing image of a child raised by trolls.

    4. Re:Someday soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As will Safari.

  12. Interesting assertion by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker

    Sure am. Only a sucker would give in to the man, and not replace IE with Firefox on his company laptop. What a sucker.

    I haven't complained about D2's not working in IE, because I recognize that it's IE's fault. I also recognize that IE will never change as long as everyone panders to its broken-ness, so I can even respect Slashdot's decision to not do so. I'll even continue to subscribe, despite not being able to use the New Shiny most of the time, because I think Slashdot's worth supporting.

    But some of us aren't in a position where it's feasible to change our client, and cheap shots at our expense aren't particularly appreciated. If you don't want to put in the time and effort to make D2 work in IE because you don't want to perpetuate the use of broken standards on the client, that's great. But I'd really appreciate not being mocked in the process.

    Thanks.
    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:Interesting assertion by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is possible with Vista, but on WinXP I just unzip the Firefox application to a folder on my desktop and run a link from there. Certainly better (and less painful) than running IE.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:Interesting assertion by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      It was just a joke, akin to Homer's, "And here I am using my own lungs like a sucker."

    3. Re:Interesting assertion by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      I think that "voluntarily" is implied in "Anyone still running D1 is a sucker", since one can not be forced to be a sucker. Since you are not running IE6/7 voluntarily, you are not a sucker according to this statement

      However, more generally, I would agree with the admins that anyone in the /. audience who chooses to run IE knowing the problems is (if not necessarily a sucker) certainly being silly.

    4. Re:Interesting assertion by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Ok, not trolling:

      IE is faster, fully supported by Microsoft and has about the same amount of bugs as Firefox.

      Make the point for me to switch and I'll do it.

      I'll start a journal entry if anyone wants to reply.

    5. Re:Interesting assertion by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Firefox is slower and bloatier, IE6 isn't all that secure, IE7 isn't all that pretty, Safari for Windows is a piece of shit.

      Opera all the way on Windows, frankly. :P

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    6. Re:Interesting assertion by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      This needs to stop. You're making an assumption about what the editor meant, a foolish thing to do. How about we do this in America from now on: let's take people for what they say, and stop going on and saying "well they implied so and so!!!" Its really irritating, and its destoryed our ability to debate.

    7. Re:Interesting assertion by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't list my preferences here, but Opera is currently my second browser.

      I don't consider Safari for Windows to be usable yet.

    8. Re:Interesting assertion by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I don't consider Safari for Windows to be usable yet.

      TBH that's pretty much my thoughts (I just phrased them slightly less elegantly...) It's a nice idea but it needs a bit of work. On a family Windows box it's even slower than Firefox, whereas here on this Mac the reverse is true.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    9. Re:Interesting assertion by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      Its really irritating, and its destoryed our ability to debate. But he did it for the children.
      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    10. Re:Interesting assertion by roadkill-maker · · Score: 1

      This [making assumptions] needs to stop. You're making an assumption about what the [slashdot] editor meant, [and making assumptions about what people say is] foolish thing to do. How about we do this in [the United States of] America: let's take people [their statements] for what they say [as its written/spoken], and stop going on [making assumptions] and saying "well they [those who made the assumptions] implied so and so!!!". Its [making assumptions that] is really irritating, and its [making assumptions that has] destroyed our ability to debate.

    11. Re:Interesting assertion by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      It's about choice. If IE meets your needs, then use it. Others have found that the extensibility and robustness of Firefox are useful, especially when combined with the fact that most malware is written for IE.

      If you've used Firefox and haven't noticed any advantages, then you're apparently not its target audience. But then that raises this question: why are you reading the nerdiest website in the world if you aren't interested in such nerdy things as fine-tuning and customizing your software?

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    12. Re:Interesting assertion by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      You do understand the English language right? There's no doubt that the words in brackets are correct. Those segments are not assumptions, they are part of our grammar. Once you establish a subject, you can refer to the subject as "it, he, she" etc. Using pronouns is not the same as making assumptions, and nothing you added to my post is an assumption, you've merely expanded the pronouns (with the exception of my very first sentence perhaps, but the subject of my rant is explicitly spelled out in the second sentence).

      The OP however is speaking on behalf of the editor. Instead of the blanket "everyone on D1 is a chump" (or whatever was said) he's narrowing who the statement is targeted at, without any indication that the editor really did mean to make a blanket statement or not.

    13. Re:Interesting assertion by roadkill-maker · · Score: 1

      Those segments are not assumptions, they are part of our grammar. Once you establish a subject, you can refer to the subject as "it, he, she" etc. Using pronouns is not the same as making assumptions, and nothing you added to my post is an assumption, you've merely expanded the pronouns (with the exception of my very first sentence perhaps, but the subject of my rant is explicitly spelled out in the second sentence). Some of the brackets were just expanding pronouns, otheres were not. For instance "in [the United States of] America" I made the assumption you were refferring to the country, USA, and not the Continent, North America. Oh, and prounouns can sometimes be ambiguous as well.

      Instead of the blanket "everyone on D1 is a chump" (or whatever was said) he's narrowing who the statement is targeted at, without any indication that the editor really did mean to make a blanket statement or not. It was actually a joke :\
    14. Re:Interesting assertion by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Some of the brackets were just expanding pronouns, otheres were not. For instance "in [the United States of] America" I made the assumption you were refferring to the country, USA, and not the Continent, North America. Oh, and prounouns can sometimes be ambiguous as well.

      True, usually if the contient is refered to though people will say North America. Its pretty common usage to just use America to mean USA.

      It was actually a joke :\

      Opps... guess I must have missed it.

    15. Re:Interesting assertion by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      It's about choice. If IE meets your needs, then use it.

      It does, but I'm always looking to improve.

      Others have found that the extensibility and robustness of Firefox are useful, especially when combined with the fact that most malware is written for IE.

      At the moment, you are correct, there is more malware for IE, however, with the extensibility and robustness of Firefox, I expect this to change.

      why are you reading the nerdiest website in the world if you aren't interested in such nerdy things as fine-tuning and customizing your software?

      Been using Visual C++ since 1.5, I customize quite a bit.

    16. Re:Interesting assertion by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      I personally find that being able to hit Control+Shift+H and then select a HTML element I don't want to see is the ultimate feature. Whether it's an annoying advertisement or just poor site layout, it's like I have control over what's displayed to me. Back in the dark ages, we had to put up with and view whatever crap a website pumped to us. (Adblock Filterset.G, Adblock Plus, Adblock Plus Elemehnt Hiding Helper)

      These are the other add-ons I'm using:
        ColorfulTabs - Colors tabs differently based on the URL
        Flashblock - I never want Flash to play automatically - especially at work where bandwidth is monitored.
        Forecastfox - Get weather forecast and severe weather warnings in-browser.
        IE View - for my company's intranet pages which don't work in FF yet (mainly URLs with improper URIs)
        Personal Menu - replace 'File', 'Edit', etc with one button, or customize however
        Tab Mix Plus - various tab options
        Tamper Data - view and modify http/https requests - helps when debugging, hacking, or blocking web apps
        Yahoo toolbar - email alerts, news, etc.

      I leave my browser window open all day so it makes sense to make it as comfortable and featureful as possible. Not to mention, I use Linux at home so it saves me from having to deal with different interfaces and idiosyncrasies.

      Granted, IE has caught up a lot with Firefox recently, but I still associate IE with tabless browsing, poor standards compliance, malware, abusive websites, irregular updates, and unstable OS integration (if you hose IE, you break a lot of apps that depend on it, so why even run that risk?).

      In general, the thing that attracts me to open source software is it eventually gets better and fixes your annoyances. Sometimes it's a trade-off, sometimes it's a trade-up. For proprietary software, many times those fixes never come... especially if there's no fiscal reason for the company to do so.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    17. Re:Interesting assertion by dwater · · Score: 1

      > It was actually a joke :\

      You should have provided more clues [instead of leaving it for the reader to assume].

      --
      Max.
    18. Re:Interesting assertion by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Its pretty common usage to just use America to mean USA.

      Does that mean we're allowed to consider common usage when we consider what you meant earlier? I'm still not sure when we are or aren't allowed to interpret what people meant instead of just "taking them at their word" (which I assume to mean "interpreting everything literally"). Or, to put it more directly--handwaving over language issues won't make them go away.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    19. Re:Interesting assertion by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      So is it common to call everyone using a certain system fools yet mean that they are only fools if some other condition is met as well? You can't argue that.

      Lets think about what using just America would mean. Both continents? No, because if you do mean both, you'll say Americas . How about just North America? That would seem odd that America would always refer to only North America, would it not? Likewise if you insist that America would always refer to South America or Central America.

      So America wouldn't refer to one of or the grouping of all the continents. What does that leave? Well, no other country has America in the name of it, so it pretty much leaves the United States of America, doesn't it?

      So you can continue to think its handwaiving, but we do have common and defined meanings for words. What the OP did (besides make a bad joke) was change the set of people which the slashdot editor was calling fools, without any indication whatsoever that is what was meant.

      Your failure to understand my point is another example of my point. I didn't say "interperate everything literally." I said that we should not change the meaning of what was said. The OP did so (if not taken as a joke) to lessen the harshness of what the editor posted. This some thing is done alot in politics; one might say "welfare is not a good system", and the opponent will twist that to mean "we should let children starve." That was not the original meaning, yet the same kind of thing happens all the time, and the latter is what most people will hear.

    20. Re:Interesting assertion by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The original word was "sucker", not "fool". They have different meanings. Case in point.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    21. Re:Interesting assertion by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Fine, sucker. The exact word didn't matter to my point. I also didn't use quotes for a reason, because I didn't remember the exact phrase. Sorry, not "case in point."

  13. that works on my old blackberry by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    however, it's kind a lame. "top 5 comments" is all you get

    an updated version based on what is mentioned in the story above would be better

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that works on my old blackberry by sr180 · · Score: 1

      I have a dopod 810 (or htc 3600) running windows Mobile 6, and the slashdot palm interface is useless. Its fine for the old days of gprs and wap, but useless when you have a good HSPD connection and it only lets you see 5 comments.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  14. D2?! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uhhhggh!! This thing is horrible! What's with the emboldened headings? Comment previews gobbling up space. Re:? The entire page juddering about with every click.

    No thanks. Call me a luddite, but I like my pages nice and static if you please. If I need to read a subcomment, I open it in a new tab.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:D2?! by porkThreeWays · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think D2 has really encouraged reading of subcomments. When I'm not logged in and defaulted to D1 I almost never read deep into a discussion because it's a pain and I lose my spot. I suspect mods on D1 do the same. So comments that make it to +3 will probably make it to +5 and those not visible will be stuck. D2 has reeeeeally helped the moderation system and I find comments more appropriately rated in general.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    2. Re:D2?! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Nested, -1 threshold. The only way to fly.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:D2?! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Not for me: flat, 0 thershold, -1 to all ACs.

    4. Re:D2?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yup, great for those of us who still love unmoderated usenet. It's painful and I LIKE it that way.

    5. Re:D2?! by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      Treshold -1: Uncut and Raw
      Highlight treshold -1: Uncut and Raw

      Now it's just like nested, but without the annoying page splits. I find a highlight treshold of 1 works fine, with messages I previously would have hidden now just not 'highlighted'.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    6. Re:D2?! by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how the comment previews are 'gobbling up space'. What else would you put there? Agreed that they may not be wanted by all, and might be done optional.
      What currently annoys me about them is that I don't see any way of telling whether the preview is the whole comment. I end up expanding them just in case, only to find out that yes, that was just a one-liner. Other than that, this might make for a fine use of the karma adjustment for small posts.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  15. Ah, the old vertical D2! by bidule · · Score: 1

    Well, I reverted to D1 when you changed the thumb from vertical to horizontal. It took some time fiddling around until I realilzed what had happened.

    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    1. Re:Ah, the old vertical D2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thumb"? You mean the sliders you can use to set what you want to see? Click on the little button thing on the corner, that switches it from top to side.

  16. "flat" d2? by syrinx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I checked, D2 did not have the "flat" display mode. I want to load up all replies to an article and be able to read them without doing anything else. (I am still annoyed at the change several years ago when the maximum number of replies on a page was limited.)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  17. Tried it by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Unless it's gotten less buggy or somehow better in other ways, I wasn't impressed with D2 at all. Maybe I'll give it another try. Then again my smartphone handles regular old slashdot fairly well via Opera.

  18. D2 is great by rufo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not perfect (as evidenced by much of the biatching around here), but at least for the way I like to read /., it's a huge improvement over the old system.

    Just wanted to be the odd person who actually comments when they like something, instead of only posting when it's broken.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    1. Re:D2 is great by Twigmon · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with this.. D2 really does work nicely. Loads faster, all the httpreq stuff is fast... very nice.

  19. (Permanent) Temporary Solution. by t3mp357 · · Score: 1

    Only a sucker would give in to the man, and not replace IE with Firefox on his company laptop.

    USB thumb drives are pretty cheap and getting cheaper. Wally World sells 32Meg sticks next to the M&M's

    My suggestion is to simply acquire one of these wonderfully useful devices (if you don't already have one) and visit portableapps.com. There is a plethora of applications that you can install on your stick (including Firefox) and use on any machine into which you can plug it (including your company laptop).

    --
    I wish I knew why this was limited to 120 characters... If I ever find the guy who did that I'm going to drag him out in
    1. Re:(Permanent) Temporary Solution. by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      Suitably configured, Cisco Security Agent will prevent executables on removable media from executing.

      That, and unapproved apps are generally forbidden by your average corporate IT policy whether they need be installed or not.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    2. Re:(Permanent) Temporary Solution. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I guess you didn't consider that USB drives may be disabled on controlled computers? Or that even if the poster could do so, he may not want to because it violates company policy.

    3. Re:(Permanent) Temporary Solution. by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      You can also install it right onto your hard drive or in My Documents or wherever your company's laptop allows you to write to, if it restricts writing to Program Files or something like that.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    4. Re:(Permanent) Temporary Solution. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      and what about the places that will FIRE YOU for having an unauthorized application on your system??

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  20. You know what would be kewl is by semifamous · · Score: 2

    Once all the bugs are worked out in this, the next cool thing would be a nifty ajaxish front page so that nobody ever has to hit "Refresh" anymore. Someone should code up some sort of ajax front page that gets the new stories as they're published. It would be cool if it also had the ability to expand the headline view into stories or collapse some stories that the user doesn't find interesting.

  21. More for IE? by RyoShin · · Score: 2

    I know you've said that IE is low priority for D2. I don't neccessarily agree, but I know as a web developer that making something cross-browser compatible can be a large pain.

    Even so, I ask that a bone be thrown to us IE users- give an option so that our use of D1/D2 is based on our browser. At home I am strictly FireFox except for the smallest subset of sites, so D2 works fine and I use it all the time. At work I am forced into a vanilla IE6 install[1]; reading comments is fine, but if I want to make a comment myself or mod a post I have to log in and deal with the IE-broken D2. I have three options:

    1) Log in, do what I want, log out to continue reading (like I'm doing now)
    2) Set my profile to not use D2 when at work and turn it on again at home
    3) Create an alternate log in to use only while at work (this would require syncing with this account)

    All of these are rather annoying and I'd prefer not to deal with them. I imagine I'm not the only one with this problem. The idea I have is that you have three options in your account: no D2, always D2, and D2 based on Browser. For the final option, a quick check is done prior to loading to see if the browser is IE or not, then choose which discussion method to use based on that.

    I'm not familiar with Slashcode, so I don't know how trivial it would be to implement, but it's a feature I could really use. It would also be a benefit for those who use other legacy browsers for whatever reason.

    [1] Yes, I've tried stuff like Portable Firefox. I made the mistake of showing a page to supervisor while using it, and now they're constantly checking to see if I'm using it. Policies are very strict around here.

    1. Re:More for IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you told your supervisors how goddamn stupid they are for using Internet Explorer, the most insecure and virus-prone browser ever, on their network?

      Any IT department dumb enough to mandate IE needs to be replaced. No wonder I can't find a goddamn job, people are hiring idiots.

    2. Re:More for IE? by Kalriath · · Score: 0, Troll

      No wonder I can't find a goddamn job, people are hiring idiots. Apparently they aren't, because you still aren't employed.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  22. The death knell for D1 for sure by sacrilicious · · Score: 4, Funny
    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker.

    To paraphrase: "D1. No chat. Uses more bandwidth than D2. Lame."

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  23. Who are you people that pay for incoming messages? by coryking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm with AT&T (formerly Cingular) and I've never, ever paid for an incoming message. Ever. The lady uses Verizon and she too never, ever has paid for an incoming text message.

    Really? What carrier does this?

  24. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D2 can't sort comments by newest first even when set in preferences.

    Pass.

  25. Looks like shit by KlomDark · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Well, that's about enough D2 for me. Half-completed floaty thing in the left side, WTF is that?

    Sorry, I write web code all day long, requirements are that it has to support IE6, IE7, and Firefox. It's a pain, but it's not actually hard. D2 is a piece of crap still.

    And Slashcode is still written in PERL? RUfuckingKiddingMe?

    D2.Visible=false; // Yuck!

    1. Re:Looks like shit by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      And Slashcode is still written in PERL? RUfuckingKiddingMe?

      I can't believe it either. Perl is 20 years old! Sheesh, that's like letting your Grandma plan your birthday party. Let's get some of these young, hip, languages in on things. According to this list on Wikipedia, F# is the youngest, hippest language. It's already 2 years old, so we've got to work fast. Hurry before the next language shows up.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  26. Now I understand by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Or should I be browsing with the bar between "abbreviated" and "hidden" dragged down all the way?
    Since I do that with the hidden (but not abbreviated), I was not aware of the problem. Now I see what you're talking about. You can't click on what isn't there, I suppose.
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  27. d2 ignores sort prefs? by MattW · · Score: 1

    Anyone still running D1 is a sucker

    Or they like their sort pref to be respected? I must be missing the obvious. D2 ignores my preference to have highest rated comments first. How do I get D2 to change the sort order?

    1. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      That's my problem too. I get a Score:2 post first that's rolled up, then a Score:3 post, before hitting the first Score:5! Sorry, D2 is buggy. Therefore...

      Hi. I'm strredwolf, and I'm a D1 user.
      Hi RedWolf!
      I'm still with D1, because D2 hasn't sucked less yet.
      A-men!

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    2. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by pudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's my problem too. I get a Score:2 post first that's rolled up, then a Score:3 post, before hitting the first Score:5! Correct.

      Sorry, D2 is buggy. Incorrect.
    3. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by renbear · · Score: 1

      Sorry, D2 is buggy. Incorrect. OK, then, perhaps we should say this: D2 appears to ignore the sort preference from the user preference sheet.

      If this is not what the programmers intend, it is a bug. If it is what the programmers intend, it is a misfeature.

      Once D2 allows for threaded sort by score, I (and others) will switch over. (I really like it, otherwise.)
    4. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by pudge · · Score: 1

      OK, then, perhaps we should say this: D2 appears to ignore the sort preference from the user preference sheet. Correct.

      If this is not what the programmers intend, it is a bug. If it is what the programmers intend, it is a misfeature.

      Once D2 allows for threaded sort by score, I (and others) will switch over. (I really like it, otherwise.) I'm glad you like it apart from that. The point is, however, that with all the additional features of D2 that sorting by score isn't necessary. Those sort orders and thread modes were all ways to get around difficulties that are being solved through the dynamic features of D2.

      Of course, to each is own: some people just like things a certain way. I speak from experience myself ...

    5. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by MattW · · Score: 1

      The point is, however, that with all the additional features of D2 that sorting by score isn't necessary.

      Define necessary. It wasn't necessary before, in the sense you could still find and read each comment if you wanted to. But a bunch of people noticed the feature was gone and miss it. I guess there's always D1. D1 with sort > D2, to me. If D1 is gone, there's always not bothering visiting the first place; go rss readers.

    6. Re:d2 ignores sort prefs? by pudge · · Score: 1

      The point is, however, that with all the additional features of D2 that sorting by score isn't necessary. Define necessary. It would serve little, if any, purpose in this system.

      But a bunch of people noticed the feature was gone and miss it. Yes. However, while I can understand missing flat mode, but it is not clear what benefit could even be derived from sorting by score in D2 when you can show only Score:5 comments, and dynamically load in Score:4 when you wish to.

      Again, to each his own. I kept using Mac OS 9 until Max OS X 10.2 came out, and for good reason. But a lot of people looked at me funny. So I won't judge people for disliking the new system, but I still don't see why scoring by score in D2 would be in any way useful.

  28. Re:Who are you people that pay for incoming messag by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    Verizon has unlimited 'in' messaging - but otherwise inbound and outbound count towards your limit and once you pass the limit you will be charged for text messages sent and received.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  29. Re:Who are you people that pay for incoming messag by edwdig · · Score: 1

    Verizon charges to send or receive text messages. The charges seem to be variable as well. I keep text messages blocked, however, before I did, I saw charges range from 10 - 17 cents. Not sure if the difference is peak/offpeak, data transfer fees, phase of the moon, or what.

    Verizon has text messaging plans that give you a couple hundred messages in or out a month for a few dollars (varies greatly depending on when you signed up for it), but without those plans, they definitely charge you for incoming.

  30. Re:Who are you people that pay for incoming messag by rvqbl · · Score: 1

    What sort of data plan do you have? I am with ex-cingular/att, and they charge me $0.10 for every text message that I receive and send. Some of their data plans include text messages I believe.

  31. Re:Who are you people that pay for incoming messag by coryking · · Score: 1

    Something like $10 for 500 outbound "anythings" (im, txt, pic, etc).

  32. Jabber by mtxf · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT here, but why isnt there a way to recieve messages, such as "new story posted", by jabber?

    I would have thought jabber support would have been ahead of aim at least :\

    1. Re:Jabber by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Well, you and that one dude in Japan can use Jabber all ya want.

  33. Strange bug when page is viewed for a long time by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

    When leaving a browser open on a particular story for a long time (say, overnight), then returning to it, comments will no longer expand. Clicking a comment header will cause the first few sentences to appear, "loading, please wait" will show in the left panel, but the comment will never load. A quick Wireshark analysis shows that instead of the comment text, the only thing the server seems to give is the character '0'. The only workaround is to refresh the page.

    Oh, and I like the x-Bender quotes... too bad nobody can see them :)

  34. D2 updates? by kwilliam · · Score: 0

    Alas, I thought the headline referred to the incredible Cowon D2 media player, lol!

  35. D2 in IE7, Firefox, Konqueror by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    On Vista, at least, IE7 and D2 now get along a lot better. The scrolling is smooth now, page updates are instant (faster than on Firefox, sometimes, but that probably has to do with what's being updated), and by and large it's fairly usable now.

    Problems still in IE7:
    1) Clicking on an AJAX link is still likely to scroll your brownser almost all the way to the bottom of the page. I have no idea why this happens but it is by far the most annoying bug.
    2) The visibility levels (white, light grey, dark grey) still float to the right of the sliders (and occsionally cover some content near the top of the screen).
    3) Expanding a comment occasionally causes the title bar of a different comment to detach from the top of its comment. This can be easily solved by very slightly resizing the window.

    Problems in Firefox:
    1) Pages still seem to take inordinately long to download (even if I disable ads).
    The incredibly annoying bug where expanding a comment wouldn't expand it fully and or show the Reply button thankfully seems to be fixed.

    Problems in Konqueror:
    1) Render speed is iffy. The page jumps around a bit before settling down to a readable state.

    I still like IE7 for its tab management (control-tab cycling through recently visited tabs in order of visiting them) and RSS feed reader. The jump-down-the-page-on-click bug is annoying, but at least the scrolling is now so smooth that it's possible to quickly get back where you were. In Linux I prefer to use Konqueror, but I do wish I could close a tab by middle-clicking it (not Slashdot's fault in any way, just a general browser gripe).

    Don't even try using D2 in Links. It will load the page, and then go nowhere until you uncheck the box and refresh. Lack of CSS support, I suppose, or perhaps no XmlHttpRequest or too limited of a JavaScript engine.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  36. "Short-code" text messages by FeatureBug · · Score: 1

    Here is an example. So called "short code" text messages are always chargeable on most UK networks including Vodafone, O2, and Virgin. The maximum charge is UKP 1.50 per incoming message. Any business (usually spammers sending invitations to enter prize draws) can ask a network provider to allocate them a short-code which is a 5-digit unreturnable number (it cannot be used to receive replies). The business can then send subscriber-to-pay text messages and the business collects the profit generated by each text message. There is no way for subscribers to block these short-code messages. You can, however, register your telephone number with the Telephone Preference Service; short-code users should consult the register to block short-code messages being sent to registered numbers, but many don't bother and send them anyway even to registered numbers. If you receive a short code message without any contact details (as often happens with spam), the only way to find out who sent it is to contact your network provider who can decode the short code number giving you the name of the company using it and the contact details.

    1. Re:"Short-code" text messages by smallfries · · Score: 1

      That's quite strange. Maybe I've been lucky but I've never been charged for any of the bizarre "deformed" SMS messages that I've been sent. This includes spam from weird numbers.

      Something that I've only seen recently is MMS shortcuts, that appear in your inbox like a regular sms. Luckily my handset puts a small world on the message icon, because the default action for these messages is to fire up gprs and go to the url in the message. These are really nasty, given the ripoff price of data access.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  37. dechunker and D22D1 by FeatureBug · · Score: 1

    I agree. I use dechunker to re-assemble discussions that have been split into multiple pages. It works well, though there can be a significant delay when reading a multi-page discussion because it tries to be nice to /. bandwidth by waiting a few seconds between loading each successive page. There is also D22D1 for converting D2 to D1. It could be an option for people who prefer D1 if /. ever decides to drop support for D1, though it is still a bit buggy. Sorry, I can't seem to find any links for dechunker and D22D1 right now.