Crew Ends 100 Day Mars Simulation in Arctic
Paul server guy writes "According to Wired Science the seven person F-XI LDM crew that has been stationed at the Mars Society's FMARS station has completed their unprecedented 100 day simulation. (Actually 101 days, because for 37 they lived on 'Mars time' adding 39 minutes to each day) According to the mission's remote science principal investigator Chris McKay, of NASA Ames. 'Their pioneering simulation of crew operations on Mars time is by far the best work on this topic ever done. It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations.'"
So when do we send people to Mars?
And do we send politicians first?
Ignore this signature. By order.
Its a bunch of space nerds wasting their time.
Why?
The gravity is wrong.
The solar radiation is wrong.
The atmospheric pressure is wrong.
The soil chemistry is all wrong.
So what have they proved other than they can sit in a phoney "space base" for 100 days and run around in mickey mouse home made space suits? Nothing.
"It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations." The fact that it says "for future Mars mission simulations" instead of just "for Mars missions" shows how far away we really are.
Wasn't it that the optimal duration of a day for humans is somewhere around 25 or 26 hours?
I always try to maximize my awake time; as Pitr would say, Sleep, she is for the weak.
And now for one truly scary detail:
Why is this scary? Well, consider this:
They're training Fremen!
Ignore this signature. By order.
It must have been hard living in a pre-fab environment never seeing the sun and wearing the same clothes for days. Now they can go back to their mom's basement where the conditions will be at least slightly different from a mars mission.
Here, fixed it for you.
Ignore this signature. By order.
I can't believe how many people seem to think this was a pointless waste of time. Sure, it's a very limited simulation, but it's a very good proof-of-concept study, and hopefully provided additional data on the psychological stresses that would be placed on a team of astronauts trying to establish an extraterrestrial base. By all means, they should incorporate more variables (true self-sufficiency, extended duration, etc) in future studies, but let's applaud an effort to study the human factors involved in space exploration.
Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?
"Their [sic] waisting [sic] there [sic] time!"
"Amusing, but you'll never be able to get across the Atlantic using wings. Airships are the future!"
"We should be putting this effort into improving the proven technology of steam locomotives."
"Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those!"
"I for one welcome welcome our new internal combustion powered, heavier than air overlords!"
There is a couple currently on a somewhat related venture.. they plan to spend 1000 days at sea in a yacht, completely self sufficient and never touching dry land for the duration.
;)
So far they are on day 121 and have had some 'fun' already - a collision with a freighter for example caused some significant damage which had to be repaired at sea.
The idea obviously is to (kind of) simulate a very long space journey where the crew have only themselves and what they can carry to depend on.
There are a few notable differences though such as the lack of fish to catch in space.
You can follow their journey here..
http://1000days.net/home/
Looks like a great adventure anyway.. wish I could take 1000 days off work!