Slashdot Mirror


Google Earth Flight Simulator

insidedesign writes "Blogger Marco has recently discovered that the newest version of Google Earth includes a flight simulator. Though simple in comparison to full-blown simulators, Google Earth's is fun and addictive. To get started, press Ctrl+Alt+A for the initial dialog (on OS X, Command+Option+A). Then choose your plane (F16 or SR22) and initial airport. Joysticks are supported; it has even been reported that force feedback works. The game's controls are sensitive so it takes some getting used to. Here are all the available controls. For a quick overview, check out this YouTube video."

51 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Might I be the first to say... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is freaking AWESOME!

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:Might I be the first to say... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't make it not awesome, just not as awesome as it could be.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:Might I be the first to say... by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's Google's Earth, so the Mac actually has a long way to go to be a good citizen on it.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    3. Re:Might I be the first to say... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      When Google released Desktop Search for Mac, all I could read on Mac forums was "meh, nothing new compared to Spotlight"

      That was because it was nothing new compared to Spotlight.

      What's wrong with google earth, besides trying to muddle through with Qt instead of having a native UI, is that it has a nasty habit of buggering window server memory that it shouldn't be touching. It even has a preference for "safe 3d graphics mode", for heaven's sake, and it still manages to scribble all over the backing stores of other apps' windows.

      I don't know if it's as badly behaved on Windows or Linux, but on the Mac it's not up to what I'd consider a beta level yet. It's fun to play around with, but it's definitely in the "you get what you pay for" category.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Might I be the first to say... by IngramJames · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm reply to THIS parent so that this post floats to the top.

      Call me a karma-whore if you will, but this may save y'all some time.

      The shortcut that worked for ME was CTRL-WINDOWS_BUTTON-A, not ALT.

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    5. Re:Might I be the first to say... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude! You're taking this way too seriously! As a guy who had a pilot's license at one time, I know that not even the most sophisticated PC-based flight sims can compare to the real thing. You just have to look at it for what it is: a cool toy.

      --
      The game.
  2. Re:Pentagon? by Cervantes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it possible to fly the plane into the Pentagon while hitting light poles along the way? It's hard to tell, as soon as you approach the Pentagon things get really fuzzy and 8-bit.
    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  3. Terrorism? by German_Dupree · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see the U.S. government attacking Google as a "terrorist training ground".

    Everyone knows that if it teaches you to fly an airplane, it's an Islam extremist hotbed.

  4. Doom in Microsoft Office by Tom9729 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is kind of like the Doom "game" hidden in one of the old Microsoft office programs. If I remember right, one version of Excel also had a flight simulator.

    I love easter eggs.

    1. Re:Doom in Microsoft Office by brteag00 · · Score: 5, Informative

      > If I remember right, one version of Excel also had a flight simulator.

      Yep, Excel '97 had a flight sim.
        - Hit 'F5'
        - Jump to cell X97:L97
        - Press 'TAB'
        - Hold down and
        - Press the "Chart Wizard" button on the toolbar.

      I bet the graphics in this one are a little better, though.

    2. Re:Doom in Microsoft Office by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 2

      Plus there was that one puzzle/maze/trivia game in one of the releases of Encarta. Good times.

      --
      ...but is it art?
  5. Wise Guys! by stox · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only airport they list for Chicago is Meigs. The only airport that no longer exists in Chicago.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Wise Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes and it SUCKS it no longer exists. I used to be able to fly into Chicago for lunch, get out of the plane and WALK to several decent resturants. But no, they decided it was much more important to have it available for Rich assholes to live on waterfront $1,000,000 condos are far more important.

      Destruction of Meigs Airport is solid proof that nobody cares about general aviation anymore.

    2. Re:Wise Guys! by hottoh · · Score: 4, Informative

      We can all thank Mayor Daily for the airport distruction (I think I spelled the Mayor's name wrong, but correcting it is not worth the effort).

      Paraphrasing the reason for the destruction, "the people of Chicago live in fear of terrorist attacks, and I need to do what I can to keep Chicago safe."

      Secretly planning to destroy the airport in the early morning hours acheives that end?

    3. Re:Wise Guys! by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chicago's dead people seem to think so; they re-elected him a few months ago.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Wise Guys! by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, you did spell the mayor's name wrong, the correct spelling is "Emperor Daley." Mein Führer and All Hail the King would also be acceptable.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    5. Re:Wise Guys! by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe that's a nod to subLOGIC's FS2, the first home flight sim to feature real locations and airports. Chicago's Meigs Field was the player's default starting point.

      --
      +0 Meh
  6. So does it work... by dbolger · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...with Google Sky?

    Start thrusters, take off, aim nose towards Andromeda, sit back and wait for two million years, find an airport, land.

    Sweet! :D

  7. Sweet by John+Frink · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just tried a flight, shows hills and everything. Way more than I expected from an easter egg. Kudos to the guy who dreamed this up.

    --
    Who is this Jimmy character, and why was he cracking corn in the first place?
    1. Re:Sweet by cathector · · Score: 3, Interesting

      of course it shows hills and everything. have you used google earth ?
      imnsfho (keepin it retro) GE is one of the most significant application of computers since internet searching,
      and layering a flight-simulator on top of it is [just] a great extension of an awesome core technology.

    2. Re:Sweet by shird · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its nice and all.. but I don't think it would have been terribly hard to implement. You can already pan the view around in the same manner.. it would have been just a matter of adding some controls and basic physics to pan the view around. The 'hills and everything' are already part of Google earth. It shows the 3D buildings too in some places.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
  8. Re:This would be a great post for April 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except that it's not exactly an easter egg. It's under the Tools menu. Verifying that it exists is easy: open up Google Earth, use Help/Check for Updates to make sure you have the latest version, and pull open the Tools menu. There it is.

    Also, here are the keyboard controls off Google's website.

    Saying that it was "discovered" makes it sound like it was hidden. It wasn't.

  9. Re:This would be a great post for April 1 by Goaway · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quoting the very page you linked to:

    Once you have entered flight simulator mode for the first time, you can re-enter the mode by choosing Tools > Enter Flight Simulator.

    So no, it's not in the Tools menu by default, and yes, it's an easter egg.

  10. Re:Pentagon? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flying close to the ground is pretty crappy anyway. Apparently there are 1500 foot rolling hills in central Arkansas. But flying from the whole-earth view in space down to little houses is awesome.

  11. Time to update the old corollary? by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Funny

    All programs expand indefinitely until they include a flight simulator. And email.

  12. Re:Pentagon? by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh no! They are completed their scrambler.

    Team 3 to position gamma!

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  13. Re:that blog by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 2, Funny

    I could have summed it up in 30 seconds
    But you didn't.
    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
  14. Re:Doesn't work for me by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zoom to San Francisco airport and try it from there.
    It is weird, but it works.
    Also, use fn-up and fn-down in place of page up and page down on a powerbook.

    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
  15. Yeah, it's all fun at first by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I for one am going to be shitting my pants when they update the ground textures to account for the bombing missions I flew in the flight simulator. I will be shitting my pants once again when I leave my house and notice the houses I targeted in my neighborhood are no longer there.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  16. Google "20% time" at work? by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder if this is one of those projects that came out of Google's "20% time" policy, where engineers are given 20% of their time (one day per week) to work on a project of "personal interest"? It's plausible, since this isn't exactly a main feature of google earth. Then again, Google Sky might have been a 20% time project, too?

    Bill Gates is probably going to be real pissed if this starts eating into his M$ Flight Sim profits, especially if (a) this remains free and (b) Google expands it to include more aircraft and options.

    On another note, I wonder if they could make this a network thing, so perhaps we could have dog fights with other users in the air? But the feds would probably put a stop to that, since that would also require Google to install live missiles and bombs in the simulator, allowing people to start bombing various structures in google earth,...

    1. Re:Google "20% time" at work? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It pretty much has to be. I can't picture anybody getting an Easter egg like this as an assignment.

      I used to be blown away by the way impressive new features appear in Google products with little or no fanfare. Contrast this with the way most companies treat every little achievement as if it were the Second Coming. But now it seems obvious that these things are released so quietly because nobody knows about them, except the people working on them. And that much uncoordinated work in not a good sign in a software development org.

      You might wonder if I'm making too much of this. After all, it's only 20% of their engineering effort. But is it? It's hard to keep track of how developers spend their time even when you have good managers. And Google barely has any managers. People I've met who work there talk (and sometimes complain) about low manager/contributor ratios and almost almost no supervision. Which makes me suspect that many folks spend most of their time on their "20%" and only do enough of their official assignments to avoid pissing off their managers — managers they hardly ever see. Meanwhile, serious bugs go unfixed and major projects lag behind schedule.

  17. Re:Doesn't work for me by Riquez · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep, it does work, but you have to hold the keys down for a few moments to trigger the dialogue box.

    --
    * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  18. Thank you Google by halo8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks to everyone at google, this is so amazing.

    THIS
    THIS is the flight sim i have wanted to fly all my life!

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  19. Re:Now maybe I should wait until tomorrow to try i by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

    There isn't a lot of air at FL500, so your IAS is gonna be pretty low.

    Quickie: IAS or Indicated Airspeed is a flight dynamic that measures the unidirectional force of air along an aircraft's angle of attack and presents this data as a speed; it is measured with a "pitot tube," a metal tube on the wing or nose of a plane that collects air and measures the amount of force being applied down the tube. At standard temp and pressure, with no wind, and with the aircraft's angle of attack parallel to the surface, this number will theoretically give you the speed at which you are traveling along the ground. As ambient pressure goes down (say with altitude), IAS for a given ground speed goes down; as wind picks up, depending on the wind's bearing to the aircraft's orientation, IAS can go up or down (A plane flying a 100 kts headwind and 100 kts IAS will, all other things being equal, in fact have a ground speed of zero). As angle of attack increases, ground speed goes down. You might be flying at Mach 2, but if you're pointed straight up, your ground speed will be zero.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  20. Look out, Flight Simulator! by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a private pilot, and the other simulators disappoint. They are good for practicing Instrument procedure, and to a certain extent, airplane maneuvers, but for just plane fun (pun intended) they are weak.

    Most of the joy of flying General Aviation (small) planes is the view - nothing like it anywhere else, including that commercial jet. (which rockets up to 45,000 feet in 10 minutes where you can't see jack) Flight simulators have typically given depictions of the landscape - patterns that are rough analogies of what you'd actually find out the window.

    But this is the real McCoy! Resolution is still weak, and the plane handling characteristics are lousy, but when I'm flying 5,500 VFR over the East Bay, it actually IS the East Bay. I noticed that once you've started the Easter Egg, you can re-launch from any view, which let me spin a few circles above local Oroville, CA.

    I recognized everything and had no trouble finding the local airport, and successfully landed the very first try in the SR-22. Since I've never flown an SR22, I had to stall it first in the air to figure out what my approach speed should be - about 70 knots seemed about right.

    Really, if they put some spit and polish on this, it could give FS X a real run for its money - for just plane fun, it already rivals FS X!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Look out, Flight Simulator! by mikeboone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently, someone else did it for them with an addon called TileProxy...I have not tried it, but there's a video here.

    2. Re:Look out, Flight Simulator! by HAKdragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now if only somebody could port this as a plug-in for X-Plane.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    3. Re:Look out, Flight Simulator! by scaryjohn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the joy of flying General Aviation (small) planes is the view - nothing like it anywhere else, including that commercial jet. (which rockets up to 45,000 feet in 10 minutes where you can't see jack) Flight simulators have typically given depictions of the landscape - patterns that are rough analogies of what you'd actually find out the window.

      But this is the real McCoy! Resolution is still weak, and the plane handling characteristics are lousy, but when I'm flying 5,500 VFR over the East Bay, it actually IS the East Bay. I noticed that once you've started the Easter Egg, you can re-launch from any view, which let me spin a few circles above local Oroville, CA.

      For a better mix of realistic scenery and handling, have you tried Flight Gear? I haven't gotten it to work on my computer so I'm not speaking from experience, but I was taken in to try it by the fact that they have 10 degree by 10 degree texture packs you can get if you want to see the area you're in, instead of a white bread approximation of it. Or get the whole world on three DVD's!

      --
      One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
    4. Re:Look out, Flight Simulator! by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a private pilot, and the other simulators disappoint.

      Even X-Plane?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  21. Re:Pentagon? by MassiveForces · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually I think all this talk of aiding terrorisim is arse backwards since flight sims are everywhere anyway. I expected the plane to bounce off the ground and just be arcade style at first, but it actually crashes and then places you far enough away from where you crashed to do a rerun of navigation... to your 'target'. So since you have to be connected the whole time to use it properly won't this just tip off the people at google HQ that somethings up if say people in certain locales start crashing into the Pentagon a bit too much all of a sudden?

  22. Really awesome, BUT... by Raven737 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just wish there was a way i could pre-cache a certain area at the highest detail level.
    As it is now, it only starts to download when you are already in an area which means
    that you are always seeing sub optimal detail levels when you fly into new areas.

    For Google it should be easy to make a simple position prediction algorithem (including z) to prioritize
    map content area and detail level download. Especially in a flight sim it should be fairly easy to predict
    near future positions with a relative high degree of certainty.

    Oh well, i was still having more fun playing this then i was playing MS FlighSim X...
    Performance probably had a lot do to with that, but also the fact that high res.
    aerial pictures for everything is simply better then crappy generated (i should say composited)
    detail textures for most everything.

    Of course this is this and MS Fligh Sim is something totally different in terms of scope and realism.
    Nevertheless, this is free, fun, quick and simple and for me that simply wins :)

  23. Re:Now maybe I should wait until tomorrow to try i by DohnJoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    As angle of attack increases, ground speed goes down I think you mean pitch instead of 'angle of attack'

    Angle of Attack is defined as the angle between the direction of the airflow wind and the wing, and has by definition little to do with the ground speed or the wind direction.
  24. Crash by plams · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shit. I just accidently crashed my SR22 into the Google Campus. I hope they don't log these kind of things..

    1. Re:Crash by F4_W_weasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      No sir we don't, but accidentally, we crashed into you gmail account, and accidentally we forwarded all the porn e-mail to your mom, your perv...
      Thanks for enjoying our flightsim.

      PS: the NSA looooved some of your e-mails.

      Hugs

  25. Thanks for the youtube video by tyrant · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've never wanted to die so much after listening to the narrative. Talk about taking a long time to explain nothing.
    "Us computer people" and did you really need to read out the URLs?

  26. Re:This would be a great post for April 1 by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 4, Informative
    You might try tinkering with one of these files, I'd start with this first:

    %PROGRAMFILES%\Google\Google Earth\res\flightsim\controller\generic.ini

    These others in the same directory seem to be for specific brands of controller:

    genius_maxfighter_f16u.ini
    speed_link_black_hawk.ini
    speed_link_cougar_flightstick.ini

    From generic.ini

    axes = [
        A1 set(DE, 1.0, 0.0)
        A0 set(DA, 1.0, 0.0)
        A3 set(DP_0, -0.5, 0.5)
        A2 set(DR, 1.0, 0.0)
    ]

    povs = [
        P0 set(HAngle, 1.0, 0.0)
    ]


    It looks like:
    A0..3 = the four axes
    P0 = hat switch
    DE = elevators
    DA = ailerons
    DP_0 = power
    DR = rudder
    HAngle = head angle

    I swapped A2 and A3 and everything was hunky-dory!

    Check out the other *.ini files and see the there are also button press and release events that can be programmed:
    B0..n = buttons

    Proceed at your own peril. And don't be a dummy like me, backup your files first!

    If you want to get really adventurous here are the flight characteristics of the available aircraft (these are also plain text files):
    %PROGRAMFILES%\Google\Google Earth\res\flightsim\aircraft\*.acf

    It's like Christmas!
    --
    +0 Meh
  27. Re:This would be a great post for April 1 by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess I was a little too excited and posted before checking everything out. There are more files in the controller director for various sticks. And the files are pretty well documented. You can also create a custom HUD and keyboard setups. Damn! You can even change the gravity and atmosphere. And apparently you don't have to modify existing configs, you can add new ones and reference them in the flightsim.ini file (where you can also setup addition airports). Haven't tested that part yet. Fun-fun-fun!

    --
    +0 Meh
  28. Re:This would be a great post for April 1 by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bah! You can't add new planes without rebuilding the dialog box resource and compiling it into flightsim.dll. Weak, Google. But thanks for making everything else so easy to monkey with.

    --
    +0 Meh
  29. Re:The "bug" has been fixed??? by newr00tic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just downloaded it to try it out and nothing happens when I press the keys.

    You must be using Linux, wherein nothing is supposed to work.

    -That's what 'free' implies.
    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  30. Re:To make it work in Linux.. by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Informative

    It may depend on your window manager. On Fluxbox I just used Ctrl+Alt+A to get into it. One thing for sure though, my crappy joystick works better with X-Plane which happens to run beautifully on linux as well.

  31. That's what others can learn from Mac users! by LKM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a user of all three major OSes, I would argue that it would do Windows and Linux users a lot of good to be a bit more critical. Looking at the apps available, there's a reason Mac apps are generally more polished: Mac users complain about stuff like that and will ignore (and thus eventually kill) crappy apps.

    Please, people, learn something from Mac users. Don't accept crap just because it's free.