Slashdot Mirror


Bulletproof Tool For Golden Age Browsing?

An anonymous reader writes "I work in a retirement/assisted living home. Many of the residents had never used the Internet but really find it fascinating once they are given a little training. However, I've stopped introducing it to them because of the drain it puts on me. There are a million and one things that a computer novice can screw up, and I don't have time to solve all of them. These folks don't need any sophistication. and they need only the most basic options. Adjustable text size would be nice, but otherwise — no email, no word processing or editing, no printing — just Internet browsing. This may not seem like a big market, but it's getting bigger every day! Is there an absolutely fool-proof device that can provide this without requiring virus scanners and constant attention?"

66 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Turn Off Javascript by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before I dive in, I have to say that I don't think you adequately explained the requirements here. In one part you seem concerned about configuration, in another you seem concerned about security & finally it seems to come down to being too sophisticated for the user.

    I'm not sure which one you value the most. But, assuming we need all three, I would suggest something like the OLPC as an everything. Yes, it's geared for children but I guess you're kind of dealing with ... well, in some cases degenerated minds. I don't say that to be mean but ironically my four year old cousin and my 80 year old grandfather have some of the same needs when it comes to high tech gadgets.

    One step up from that would be to use a premade Live CD of Ubuntu or Dragonfly or some other easy live Linux OS. You show them how to reboot with it and then they can surf like that. The downside is they can't save anything to disk but the upside is they can't save anything to disk :). Granted, this may violate your sophistication requirement (and destroy caching), it has the huge benefit of going "Oooops, time to simply reboot."

    You know, the last college I attended had labs where you had administrative privileges but they reverted to a system restore point nightly. As a result, there would be screwed up machines but only for a day or week at most.

    But, if we assume you don't want to reboot with a live CD of the OLPC or Ubuntu, you could instead simply turn off cookies & turn off javascript. Why? Because javascript is the devil. I think it has some of the most flawed type casting (if I can call it that) out there today. It's not a "type safe" language. And the proliferation of JSON objects in Javascript is frightening. But once you eliminate cookies & javascript, you also eliminate a lot of functionality.

    I would suggest giving them the flash plugin (pending system requirements) as it's not so bad anymore. That and they'll probably want to watch YouTube videos of their offspring. I think that is a fair trade being as the latest Flash plugin is fairly secure.

    So, I would finally recommend you give them plain jane mozilla firefox with no javascript or cookies & the flash plugin. It probably wouldn't hurt to jack the security meter up to the top and just tell them that sites they can't access are bad sites anyways.

    Once again, I could use more requirements before giving you a final assessment but the above two options sound like they would come pretty close to satisfying your (and their) needs. These were made under the assumptions that these people suffer from learning disabilities in their old age and, as a result, you cannot host training sessions whereby you show them safe & secure internet usage.

    In the end, I predict that some of the users are going to find a way to make it hard for you and them. I suggest starting with the lightest steps and only progressing forward as necessary.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Verte · · Score: 3, Informative

      they'll probably want to watch YouTube videos of their offspring. YouTube uses Javascript to load the flash plugin. Silly, no? Unfortunately, we're stuck with Javascript for some time now. But, I like the other idea, not having write access to the media from which you boot off.
      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    2. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Shados · · Score: 5, Informative

      It uses javascript to load Flash because of that issue with IE and plugins because of patents problems. Its the workaround to go around the workaround (wow...) that allows external code to load a plugin without user interaction so you don't have the "Click here to enable this plugin" thingy popping up.

      Wow, thats the most runabout post I ever wrote. Going to bed.

    3. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Stormie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you could instead simply turn off cookies & turn off javascript. Why? Because javascript is the devil. I think it has some of the most flawed type casting (if I can call it that) out there today. It's not a "type safe" language.

      So, basically, your advice is that he provides them with a pretty much completely non-functional system, that will fail with most websites they might visit, purely to satisfy your religious zealoutry re typesafe languages? Good advice.

    4. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, basically, your advice is that he provides them with a pretty much completely non-functional system, that will fail with most websites they might visit, purely to satisfy your religious zealoutry re typesafe languages? Good advice. That's right. He's a zealot and his commentary on how unsafe Javascript is has nothing to do with backing up his point about turning Javascript off. In fact, his whole post is him just babbling incoherently with no related points whatsoever.

      Your post, however, now that's right on the fucking money. He kind of did mention it would severely reduce functionality though. But I like yours better still. A sentence, a sentence fragment and not a singly fucking reinforcing point. Well argued, sir!
    5. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Zemran · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to work at a college were we had three classrooms with remote boot PCs. It was great because you could just turn off the power to the whole room without worrying and everytime a class came in the PCs worked as expected. I am still an advocate of remote boot even though it seems to have gone out of fashion. The downside in this senario is that it requires a server. It is only really good for multiple machines. With remote boot you can point home directories to the server and maintain just one machine and any updates are only done once on the image rather than to each machine.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    6. Re:Turn Off Javascript by try_anything · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with Javascript is not linguistic. The problem with Javascript is that turning it on means downloading code from websites and automatically executing it on your machine. Javascript has a few security limitations, but it can change what you see in the browser, alter your HTTP requests, send and receive HTTP requests and responses on your behalf, and other things that are useful for attackers. Bugs are the least of your worries.

    7. Re:Turn Off Javascript by drijen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why make this so difficult? Simply use Deep Freeze http://www.faronics.com/ or Clean Slate http://www.fortresgrand.com/products/cls/cls.htm.

      When the user is done with the computer, just reboot, and it will be back to its original configuration. If users need a 10MB space or whatever for bookmarks, load them to an internal webpage, or allow that space on a spare computer.

      No mess, no fuss, easy.

      Disclaimer: I used deep freeze on my grandmother's computer because i grew tired of hearing about broken things every time I visited. That was several years back, and I have not heard a peep since.

    8. Re:Turn Off Javascript by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just disable Javascript and whitelist pages that are reasonably safe.

      Perhaps you could use a browser on some TV box thing, e.g. a Wii or PS3, those have less that can be messed up.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Turn Off Javascript by vtcodger · · Score: 3, Informative
      ***In short, our eyes wear out as we age.***

      You bet they do. I'm nearing 70 and my prebyopia (limited ability to bend the eye's lens) is much less advanced than most of my contemporaries. Still, though I'm sitting about 50cm from the monitor because that's the closest I can focus this year. I have to wear reading glasses to read books except in really bright light because my arms just won't stretch far enough any more.

      The problem is that most geeks and web designers are young and fairly unconscious. They design screens that the elderly can't possibly read at the intended resolution and are difficult to cope with when font sizes are increased. They'll probably figure out that wasn't such a great idea in a few decades (presbyopia often sets in as early as age 45). But that won't help the folks they have unecessarily inconvenienced. And, BTW, not all vision problems in the elderly can be fully corrected with glasses.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    10. Re:Turn Off Javascript by WPIDalamar · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a great project called swfobject that does all the browser/flash player version checking people want javascript for. But the great thing is that it'll fallback to non-javascript methods if not available. I don't know why more sites don't use it.

      http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/

    11. Re:Turn Off Javascript by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't Youtube be the ones in violation of the patent then? Seems to me that if the patent covers the plug-in automatically starting, then whoever is facilitating that would be in violation of the patent.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:Turn Off Javascript by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you seen random young people try to use the WiiMote to type and point?

      now amplify times old people shakes, not good solution.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    13. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh god no. Install a locked down kiosk setup of puppy linux. Boots in 30 seconds if you set it right and have it run from RAM only. Who cares if it get bonkered, give them a big red button that says "FIX IT" on it and it will work perfectly. let it have javascript and all the cookies it wants. if they figure out how to close firefox, make firefox respawn on close. perfect solution.

      I even removed the hard drives, boots from a old useless 256 meg CF card (80X card) stuck in a $2.00 adapter in the IDE port on the motherboard. works great and the church has not needed me to even touch it for almost 4 years now.

      Flash and firefox is out of date on it but who cares, we don't need elderly going to albinoblacksheep.com or happy tree friends now do we, and security holes are a non-issue when you run from ram and have no mounted writable drives.

      Don't make it complex, make it a diskless kiosk that runs from ramdisk, no fuss, no work, just call it done. and certainly don't make it windows based that would be way more work to do the same thing as well as cost a lot more for the copy of embedded XP.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Turn Off Javascript by hoeyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This kind of thinking is remarkably narrow, in my opinion. "Turn off javascript?" Yes, what better way to introduce people to the Internet than by letting them view thousands of pages with degraded markup, broken applications, and missing funcitonality?

      I'm sorry that you hate JavaScript -- I know it's a tool that has design flaws and that's abused by lots of people. But, the last time I checked, bad nasty evil JavaScript is what makes Google Maps work. For most new Internet users, the most exciting and common activity is to find their own house on Google maps, and look at the satellite picture.

      I just don't see how turning off that functionality makes anybody's experience better.

      And other posters have described FAR better methods of ensuring browsing safety and security than disabling a major feature set.

    15. Re:Turn Off Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I have not heard a peep since.

      When was the last time you checked on her?

  2. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, you should know better than to ask a question like that on Slashdot. The Mac guys will say to use a Mac, and the Linux guys will say to use Linux. And then the Windows guys will complain about bias. Just watch =)

    1. Re:Obvious by DeadChobi · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is it about all the "use Linux" posts on slashdot? Jeez, this is one of the most biased communities on the internet when it comes to operating systems. Everyone knows that Windows provides the most user-friendly browsing experience on the face of the planet.

      --
      SRSLY.
    2. Re:Obvious by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Without an emoticon I can't tell if you're being tongue-in-cheek or trolling.

      I'm going to assume you're kidding.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Obvious by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ***The Mac guys will say to use a Mac, and the Linux guys will say to use Linux. And then the Windows guys will complain about bias.***

      You've sort of bracketed the right answer there. Almost all malware attacks today are aimed at Windows users. Using Windows pretty much mandates using a virus checker that will need to be attended to. And a firewall and/or NAT router is pretty much mandatory with Windows. The specifications say minimal maintenance. So Windows is probably the wrong OS for this application.

      So -- Linux or Mac -- whichever the guy who is setting things up with is more comfortable with. I've never found Macs to be especially easy, natural, or intuitive despite undending claims to the contrary. So, I'd probably go with Linux -- probably using Xfce which seems to be evolving as simpler but adequate user interface alternative to GNOME and KDE. Someone who is Mac compatible would probably go with a Mac.

      Browser? They are all baffling to the uninitiated.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:Obvious by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Without an emoticon I can't tell if you're being tongue-in-cheek or trolling.


      So, you must get so confused when you leave your basement.
    5. Re:Obvious by cooley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Load up MS-DOS and get them to telnet on port 80 and browse like that. =) But if you do that, make sure to tell them "In MY day, we didn't have fancy graphical web browsers and operating systems with a damn GUI. We spent hours downloading ASCII pr0n, and we LIKED IT!"
      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
  3. Wii by Techno-Hat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's called a Nintendo Wii. Turn it on, browse awhile, zoom in, zoom out and turn it off.

  4. Firefox in kiosk mode? by mccrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    F11 in Firefox goes to full screen mode. Lots less to mess up.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    1. Re:Firefox in kiosk mode? by Simon80 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Firefox in kiosk mode, configured as your X session (i.e. the app that is executed by X when it starts up), on an X server that is reloaded automatically, with all the VTs disabled, is apparently pretty bulletproof in practice.

    2. Re:Firefox in kiosk mode? by AigariusDebian · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://webconverger.com/ does just that and a bit more to ensure a functional and safe web kiosk experience.

  5. Live CD by zogger · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just use machines with a decent amount of RAM,like a full gig, an optical drive, and one of the mini linux distros like damn small. No hard drive needed. About as simple to do as anything and un-hosable.

    1. Re:Live CD by matthew_nourse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some browse-only Live CDs (eg cl33n and Webconverger just boot, connect to the internet and open Firefox....even less to break than DSL. [Full disclosure: I put cl33n together, originally for new computer users at a local community centre].

  6. VMWare to the rescue! by aweraw · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the VMWare browser applicance... basically a disposable OS with browser in a vmware image. If it gets broken, just create another copy - no need to worry about the base system getting hammered with crap.

    VMWare Player is free - have at it!

    --
    5468652047616D65
    1. Re:VMWare to the rescue! by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not hard to set the virtual machine so that it doesn't commit changes. That's probably the easiest thing to do. No need to create a new copy.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    2. Re:VMWare to the rescue! by CAR912 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thank heavens for Leet Key, just select, right-click, and select leetkey->text transformers->base64 decode... several times.

      --
      - Move "Sig". For great justice!
  7. Linux with Firefox and no window manager by 808140 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This seems like a no-brainer to me. You don't even need a window manager, although there are some minimalist ones that will do the trick for things like the preferences window, etc. Firefox has font-size adjustment, so that's not a problem, and you can theme gtk to be high contrast with large font sizes in the menu, etc.

    Why make life difficult on yourself?

  8. suggestion: by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

    show them lemonparty. They won't be interested any more. (then again, maybe they will).

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:suggestion: by RabidMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      oh dear god, I hadnt run across that before and totally looked it up.

      please, pass me the acid.

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  9. DSL by Tsiangkun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get a Damn Small Linux CD.

    Boot off CD, to RAM if possible, and enjoy the internet.

    100% worry free computer usage.

    If they want the computer to do more than just the internet, tell
    them the instructions are available, on the internet. Have fun.

  10. Opera on Linux by Dlugar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try Opera on Linux. You get full resizing (of both text and images) with single buttons (plus and minus, no modifiers needed). With Linux you can put work into locking down everything else, so e.g. you can only have a single, full-screen version of Opera running.

    Dlugar

    --
    Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
    1. Re:Opera on Linux by Echnin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll second this. The zoom feature of Opera is one of the few ingenious Opera features that haven't been copied by other browsers yet. Everything is increased in size smoothly, even Flash elements. Just get some reasonably high-resolution monitors for the machines (1600 horizontal), and run at 200% default zoom, then you can have blind people browsing the web. Another poster mentioned that only the content is zoomed, and not the application itself, but you will probably want to hide or disable most of the application interface (menu bar, tabs) using kiosk mode http://www.opera.com/support/mastering/kiosk/ anyway. You can set the images in the address bar to large size, and then the only remaining issue (which I admit may be somewhat significant) is the size of the address field, which is still small. It is possible this can be configured using themes, but I don't know.

      --
      Lalala
  11. Opera Kiosk Mode by Pap22 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.opera.com/support/mastering/kiosk/

    Designed to be used at public terminals. Bonus points for installing it on Linux.

    1. Re:Opera Kiosk Mode by AmishMoshr · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Epiphany web browser has similar lock-down options under the Gnome desktop. It uses the same underlying rendering system as Firefox so site compatibility is good. I think you have to dig in to gconf-editor to turn all of the restriction options on, but I think from there you can restrict the browser to settings similar to what you seem to want. The interface is, by default, also very minimal which is a bonus for such situations.

      Some example options:
      - Lock to fullscreen mode
      - Disable all protocols except http and https (can specify others to allow)
      - Hide the menubar
      - Disable quit
      - Disable toolbar editing

      Java can be disabled. The pop-up blocker and ad blocker both work well with little to no configuration on the part of the user.

      There was a general Gnome push for kiosk-type support some time ago. I think many of these features stem from that.

    2. Re:Opera Kiosk Mode by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - Disable quit

      NO! Don't do this!

      Quitting is by far the easiest way to ensure that cookies and current login sessions and whatnot are wiped.

      You want to set it up so that when your browser is exited, it is automatically restarted. U Wisconsin has public kiosks around campus that work this way.

      (I don't think you want to make them log in and out and such. Just make it so you walk up, and the browser is there running.)

  12. Use Kiosk Software by mombodog · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. Gentoo Linux and Firefox Kiosk by Jessta · · Score: 2, Informative

    - Gentoo Linux(minimum system means less things can be broken and less security updates required)
    - ssh (for remote administration)

    - xorg
    - Firefox( I think there is a kiosk mode addon, and you'll have to install security updates every couple of weeks)
    - dwm (remove the status bar and add rules to tag all firefox window the same)
    and run it all as a user with only read/write permission to firefox's cache.

    You can't disable javascript because so many websites stupidly depend on it.
    I've seen some sites that don't display anything if javascript is disabled.

    - Jesse McNelis

    --
    ...and that is all I have to say about that.
    http://jessta.id.au
  14. Write a program tthat browses by nate+nice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Write a simple program that calls off to their favorite sites and prints them out. Then give them paper version of what they like.

    Then they can pass it around, etc. Sort of like bookmark sharing.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  15. try thin clients or boot cd's by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know, gonna get ripped, but what the hell...

    set up a pretty decent single computer (running linux of course) and hook several terminals to it. have them either boot up like LTSP or do a small install and get X remotely. they could log in and you can set up what apps they have access to. if they aren'[t computer literate, they won't know firefox on linux from firefox on XP. and it's a bit safer, I'd wager.

    or, remoce (or just unplug) the hard drives and give them boto cd's like ubuntu. or just leve the cd's in the drive. you can make a custom ubuntu cd which has only basic browsing, plus can already be set up for proxies, etc.

    either way, it's gonna be hard to mess up the system. that's my $0.02. more work up front, far less down the road.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  16. A Simple Solution by Soloact · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe someone already has done something like this with Linux, called "Cl33n Linux" http://cl33n.com/index.html It allows browsing and only uses Web Applications and Web Mail if the user wants to do some other type of work. Although it doesn't include Flash, you might be able to include that in a variation. Then install it in kiosks. Hope this helps you in your search. The only other options would be Internet Appliances, such as Compaq's old IA or WebTV.

  17. Come-on, never heard of a kiosk? by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it hard to believe that this guy needs to ask the question and never heard of Kiosks or Live CDs.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  18. Jamie Zawinski has already done this. by bdubSOv1iKIJ403M · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aside from the large text size requirement, this sounds really similar to something that Jamie Zawinski (http://jwz.org) did for the DNA Lounge kiosks -- a set of diskless linux systems that all network boot from a central NFS server, and are easily resettable. (Sounds like quite a weekend to set up, though.)

  19. LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Run Mac OSX. set it to the simple finder mode. There you can lock out all applicatons you don't want them to have. They cannot edit the icons in the dock so what they see is what they get (and they can't accidentally delete them either). And finally if ALL you really want is Browser, you can put it in kiosk mode and even have it boot that way. SO all it is is a browser, up and running when you snap on the machine.

    Now if you are budget minded you could do the same with Linux. Use a Live CD, configure it to boot to a browser. Remove all the other icons and don't give them permission to the apps. One of the very easiest ones to configure this way is DSL linux which has the benefit of booting very very very fast from CD and running on old, memory starved hardware, and being parcimonous about screen realestate. However, for you i'd recomend DSL-N (not DSL) as that is more modern.

    If you are not budget minded, it would be smarter to go with the mac. several reasons
    1) lots of plugins will be easier to use. likepdf support in the browser itself, (flash quicktime silverlight....)

    2) some folks there might want a real computer too. The liveCD linux boot will be constraining. Macs, have faster user switching so you can corral the people who need the simple finder but let other use it in advanced mode.

    3) Eventually they may want to add a few more apps. maybe they want for example to have podcasts. google earth. Watch DVDs

    4) you can keep a mac secure without going crazy. You can even firmware lock it to keep the wiseguys at bay.

    5) it's easier to attach portable disks, second or external screens, cameras, etc... to the mac. No sys admin needed.

    6) If you need support you can call apple and so can they if you are not around.

    7) For desktops there are no cables and they are easy to adjust to viewing angles (like for a wheel chair)

    8) easier to use applications, should they want them.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Mac OSX Simple Finder by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh and the other biggy on a mac is the meu bar is a the top of the screen and the ability to use a one button mouse. Both of those are a LOT better for your old folks. It has the handicapped access modes too (locking shift keys, high contrast views, zoomable)

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  21. Security by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Informative
    There's nothing wrong with wanting to keep the computers safe from the users, but don't neglect the opposite of this.

    As every poster has pointed out, you can rock-solid a computer with Kiosk modes, virtual machines, etc, etc. But if you're going to put a tool like the Internet into the hands of (shall we say) "unskilled" users, you have a responsibility to protect them from the baddies.

    Before anyone gets on the computer for the first time, drill some basic saftey tips into them. Do not give out passwords. Do not give out personal data. Do not give out financial data. Not to anyone, no matter how legit it looks. For many, this is probably their first experience on the internet. You cannot take for granted that they have been ingrained with The Basics. They don't know about Phishing. They don't know people can make a website that looks exactly like their banks' website. They don't know about Nigeran princes. Their bases have only every belonged to them.

    Print out some Golden Rules, and post them in the computer lab/common area/whatever. If the computers are going to be in the resident's apartments, make sure you print out something that can be stuck to the monitory.

    Send them out to play, but not in traffic.

    You can do some things behind the scenes as well. Route everything through a gateway you control. Make sure you have some good security on it. Go grab PeerGuardian's list, and maybe mvps.org's host file. Keep it up to date so that it blocks all the well known phishing sites. Concider blocking any outbound request for an IP address (rather than an URL). Run a mail server with a kickass spam filter, and give them all their own email boxes. (grandpaAbe@shadyacres.com). It also makes it easier to whitelist their friends&family email addresses to let legit attachments through.

    Try running guided tours of the Internet. Don't just pluck them down and say "here you go". Show them good places to go, and how to get there. News sites. Wikipedia. National Geographic's site. Typing Tutor sites. Maybe some instructional courses: How to use Flickr to view and post family albums. How to edit a Wikipedia article about the hometown they grew up in (and know everything about... preserve the knowledge!)

    Do this right, and not only will you have safe comptuers-- but you'll also have safe, happy, productive users.

  22. Depends on what you want by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Subject says it.

    If you are really, REALLY only interested in a browser, then Firefox on Linux takes the cake. VMWare-based solutions are overcomplicated and under-performing. Firefox on Linux has the following neat qualities:

    1) Once configured with well supported hardware, it's nearly impossible to hork without the root password.

    2) cron can automagically apply updates (via yum on RPM distros, apt on Debian derivatives) via cron.

    3) Viruses are rare to non-existent. (See #1)

    4) Usability is good - it's not hard to teach somebody how to use it.

    5) Compatability is decent. (not all flash/shockwave/java thingies work without a bit of crabbing, but it's usually doable)

    6) Works wonderfully with that old 1.5 Ghz P4 you got at the yard sale for $80.

    7) Remote support is decent. You can ssh in, forward X11 to your local system, and see whatever they see.

    But, if you want MORE than the basics (EG: a browser + Internet connection) and might want to give the users a full computer (TM) then I'd strongly recommend a Mac. They can be had used for fairly cheap, almost all will run OSX, and I've never seen a computer that I've had fewer problems with when my 6 kids bring over their 27 friends to my (forever messy) kid-friendly house.

    If they are more expensive, it comes back rather quickly in "OMFG IT JUST FRICKKEN WORX!" savings. (but don't expect Windows Media support anytime soon)

    And, in case you are curious, I'm a long-term Linux geek, my laptop runs Fedora Core 6, my servers are all CentOS 4.x and I love 'em. They are rock-solid and the servers deliver 99.95% uptime. (most of the last 0.05% is not because of software problems, either)

    Linux is fabulous for servers, passable for a deskop, mostly due to lack of 3rd party support.. MacOS is the opposite - teh shiznit for desktop systems thanks to great OS and decent 3rd party support, but only passable for a server.

    Windows is, at best, median at either - although it's a crappy solution to both desktop and server issues, the industry 3rd party support makes up for much of the rotting carcass that is the Win32 API.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  23. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by BiggyP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why bother with a LiveCD at all? If you have machine with a harddisk then give them a full fledged linux system fully installed, the majority of your limitations will go away and suddenly the idea of buying a Mac is less attractive.

  24. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by arivanov · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is an easier way to do it with Linux than live CD. Much higher performance as well.

    Start with a full install of Debian or Ubuntu or any other distribution that strictly complies to the fs standard and does not write into /usr. Build it with separate /,/var,usr and use tmpfs /tmp /var/tmp. Install all necessary plugins. Once you are happy with the result switch /usr to read-only mode. Do not give them a root password and provide sudo instructions for the visiting grandchildren if the golden age customer asks them to install something in addition.

    This has been tested on a Golden Age customer (my mom) and this setup is the first machine she has had so far that does not require any maintenance. It just works regardless of powercuts, cats sleeping on the keyboard, etc. She had a windows before that and it got trojaned with a dialer hijacker which clocked her an insane phone bill. It also worked 10% of the time. During the rest it was suffering from various windowsy degenerative diseases. Prior to that she had a linux with a normal read-write install and she successfully managed to f*** it up by pressing the power button during fsck a couple of times.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  25. The solution has been around for a while by Mean+Mr.+Mycroft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Bob should do the trick.

  26. lynx by turing_m · · Score: 4, Funny

    with a 21 inch monitor (nice big text by default), OpenBSD, no X, just a terminal. What's not to like?

    "These folks don't need any sophistication. and they need only the most basic options."

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  27. Install the Wikipedia search plugin too by Von+Rex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sometimes I help the elderly learn about computers. One thing that never fails to amaze them is Wikipedia.

    Sifting the signal from the noise in a typical google search is just too complex for people that are computer novices as well as internet novices. But show them the Wikipedia plugin, where they can just search on whatever they're curious about and immediately get a single response that probably answers their question, and they'll immediately grasp just how cool the internet can be and they'll want to learn more.

    I usually set windows to large or extra-large fonts, too. Just ask them which setting they find most comfortable while they are in front of the computer.

    1. Re:Install the Wikipedia search plugin too by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to go vandalise Metamucil on Wikipedia and say it's commonly used to poison unwanted older relatives.

      (hey, if Nigerian scams work...)

  28. Old People need more than that! by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    .... and the people who support actual old people will complain that you don't understand what old people need. Unfortunately, many old people need a bit more than the original poster suggested.
    • They do need Javascript and Flash, because too much of the Web uses it. Therefore you need an environment that can support that dangerous junk safely :-) You also need to be able to play a couple of different video and audio formats.
    • Old people print stuff. That's how they remember it between sessions, especially if they've got a kiosky environment where they can't save their own stuff easily. It's also how they make it easier to read some things that are hard to read on screen. So you need printing.
    • Shared machines might need logins or equivalent to take care of bookmarks and web-page stored passwords.
    • Old people need email, but you can punt it over to Yahoo/etc. if you want.
    • Some old people like Instant Messages; others don't.
    • Some old people need to be able to load pictures from their cameras, so they can mail them to their kids or grandkids.


    My first thought was to do a Linux livecd of some sort (or MacOS or BartPE or OpenBSD if you're not a Linux fan.) You *should* be able to do a pretty safe read-only-/usr environment instead, which will perform better and be a bit more reliable, and you can build yourself a reinstall-everything CD/DVD to fix things in case it's acting up - just try to find some way to preserve any user account settings. VMWare or User-Mode Linux or Xen can make it easy to build a heavy-duty sandbox environment to make it easier to keep the basic system safe if you want.


    The important part of the user's interface to the operating system is that if they turn the power switch off and then on again, everything will work as if it were loading from scratch. Maybe they need to type in their name and a password, or maybe not.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  29. Give them some responsibility by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would suggest something like the OLPC as an everything. Yes, it's geared for children but I guess you're kind of dealing with ... well, in some cases degenerated minds.

    'In some cases' is the key phrase here. In most homes there will be enough people who are perfectly capable of using a computer.

    In short, my advice is to find the one of them with the most clue or potential for clue and make him/her the sys admin. Then let them do what they like.

    I work in geriatric psychiatry and my group has been interviewing older people in institutions to understand in what way their needs are or are not being met. A common theme that arises among the cognitively intact (who are quite often smarter than most of us) is that they feel useless, they can see there are needs within their environment that are not met and they are not empwered to do anything about it. This upsets them greatly.

    You've probably got people in your home who were in techincal jobs before they retired, and are more than capable of looking after a couple of PCs. Give them some Linux CDs or Windows or whatever and a good book and let them figure it out. They've probably got nothing better to do.

    They'll feel empowered, they'll teach their friends, and leave you alone. Don't patronise them, don't give them a crippled system.

  30. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by sniggly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Same here, my mother is using debian, firefox, google mail and openoffice allows her MS compatible document exchange for her charity work; the box is behind a firewall and the setup works flawlessly. People who claim linux isn't ready for this kind of setup are clueless, it is windows which cannot function properly in this setup; my mothers friends all operate spyware and virus infested zombie spam mail systems and I am glad I don't know enough about windows to help them out. Windows + office also costs a bundle.

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  31. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by AigariusDebian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Easy, there is specialised Web kiosk software that is free and easy to get and use - http://webconverger.com/

  32. XP Embedded? by PalmAndy · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are a serious windows user and you don't want to go the Linux or OSX route try XP Embedded (XPE). I have played with XP Embedded and it has a nice feature where you can lock the hard drive (or flash card). When a user boots all the temporary stuff is created in a RAMDrive. You can install standard software such as Firefox or some office software and then lock any further changes. People can keep their documents etc on a USB stick. When the PC is rebooted then it reverts back to the locked down version. There is even a hibernate once a resume many feature where the OS is loaded from a hibernate image which is extremely fast.

    In an ideal word Linux would be the best bet but XPE has its benefits if you are from a windows background.

  33. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Same here with the sole difference of Yahoo Mail instead of Google Mail.

    I will also add the following trick to this. You can safely test any improvements, configs, desktop settings, locks etc with a 5 year old prior to deployment. If it works and he does not break it, you can safely roll it out onto the unsuspecting golden age population.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  34. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by ricebowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do not give them a root password and provide sudo instructions for the visiting grandchildren if the golden age customer asks them to install something in addition.

    So, wait...you're suggesting that visiting strangers should have sudo instructions/access but not the main users of the machines? I can't imagine that applications would be installed so frequently as to be problematic for the OP to install, thereby maintaining security and avoiding apparently-random changes to the installation. Plus the consensus so far seems to be towards read-only privileges to /usr, would it not be even simpler to offer something along the lines of removable media, such as a USB stick, for saving to and simply allowing the default installation of applications? At the very worst, if the users are aware of Gmail, on attempting to save a dialogue could be configured to suggest that either a USB key is required or that the user simply email the document to themselves for online storage?

    I am, regretfully, inexperienced with *nix but it should, I'd imagine, be possible? And this way maintains security/integrity of the machines.

    Of course if the machines are regarded as the property of the people using them then they should certainly have more freedoms, whether that incurs more work for the sysadmin is, to my mind, irrelevant. People are never to old to learn and adapt and, some research suggests, continuing to learn reduces the likelihood of memory-loss, degenerative mental illnesses.

  35. Re:LiveCD DSL linux or Mac OSX Simple Finder by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No.

    The OAP has the possibility to elevate his privileges to install an applications and has the instructions on how to do it.

    Based on experience the OAPs never ever uses that. He/She always coopts visiting grandchildren to do that. While you can create them an account as well it always ends up being done from the OAP account as well so no need to do that./

    In the meantime he/she has 0 privileges on the machine and keeps on using it and it does not break.

    By the way - these are simple practical observations on a number of Linux installs done by me or some of my friends for the parents. While they may seem weird, that is the way it turns out to be in real life.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  36. Don't underestimate your elders by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yhese folks don't need any sophistication. and they need only the most basic options. Adjustable text size would be nice, but otherwise -- no email, no word processing or editing, no printing -- just Internet browsing.

    I disagree.

    Used imaginatively, the computer can break down the physical isolation of the elderly and disabled. Help them to read, to write, to speak their mind freely. Don't deny them the benefits of e-mail, instant messaging and chat.

    Don't deny them a printer. Encourage them to personalize their small - institutionalized -space with letters, photographs, graphics of every kind. Let them fill scrapbooks, albums.

    There is so much out there that they would enjoy.

    My grandmother loved the sentimental artwork of the Victorians, Coolidge's poker-playing dogs.

    If they are lucky, there will be - one - Reading Radio station programmed to their needs and tastes. On the Internet, there may be dozens, hundreds.

    Don't ignore the mental and physical challenge of online games and puzzles.