Slashdot Mirror


Steve Fossett Missing

jd writes "Steve Fossett, the first person to fly a plane around the world without refueling, the first person to fly around the world in a balloon, and possibly the record-holder for the highest-altitude glider flight, is missing in Nevada. He is reported to have taken off in a light aircraft last night and has not been seen since. As he had filed no flight plan, would-be rescuers have no idea where to even begin looking. The plane took off from a private airstrip on a ranch at the south end of Smith Valley in western Nevada."

62 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Gov't got him? by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did he fly over Area 51 or somewhere he shouldn't have?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Gov't got him? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, c'mon. All joking aside, there will be plenty of wild speculation. Let's apply Occam's Razor here and say that most likely, he probably crashed somewhere. He took off from a private airstrip unannounced. No one knew where he was going or even exactly when he left. He could be just about anywhere -- most likely on the ground in pieces.

  2. The obvious by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aliens. Probably the same ones that took Earhart.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:The obvious by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aliens abudcted a racecar driver?

    2. Re:The obvious by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aliens abudcted a racecar driver? No, GP is obviously referring to Dr. Larry Erhardt - who mysteriously disappeared from Deep 13 and was later eaten by a giant spider.
      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    3. Re:The obvious by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      GP is obviously referring to Dr. Larry Erhardt

      More likely Amelia Earhart

      Of right, I forgot... Amelia Earhart was the one who was abducted by aliens, while Larry Erhardt's disappearance was never satisfactorily explained...
      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  3. In other news by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US Military denied claims that a UFO had been shot down last night over Area 51.

  4. Comb the Desert! by Red_Foreman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Find anything yet?

    Nothing yet, sir.

    Find anything yet?

    Nothing yet, sir.

    How about you?

    We ain't found shit!

    1. Re:Comb the Desert! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, do you think we're being too literal?

    2. Re:Comb the Desert! by mseidl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Colonel Sandurz: Sir, do you think we're being too literal?
      Dark Helmet: No you fool, we're following orders. We were told to comb the desert so we're combing it.

  5. Re:He is such an attention whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then get off your ass and make a fortune and stop being a whiny little bitch. That might help.

  6. The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by rickst29 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although the upcoming cold front is expected to create high winds this afternoon, conditions this morning were quite good. I hope that he was able to ditch in a survivable place, and pray for his safety.

    1. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      On the other hand, we can assume that his aircraft had a very respectable two-way radio. Whatever the misfortune was, it must have been fast enough that he was not able to send any kind of message. Well, yes, that assumes that there was no significant obstruction and there was anyone listening - neither of which can be guaranteed in a remote area - but it seems most likely that disaster struck fast.

      Light aircraft parachutes have been around for some time now, and emergency beacons are practically a throw-away item. At this point in the light aircraft/experimental aircraft game, fatal crashes involving the ground (as opposed to buildings, mountains, seagulls, etc) should be relatively rare and rescuers should never be stumped.

      Yes, I most definitely hope Steve Fossett is safe, but whether he is safe or not, I think that given the current state of technology, it would be good if questions were being asked as to why we don't even know. Are the parachutes so overpriced or unavailable that even someone like Mr. Fossett could not afford one? Are the laws on transmitters so onerous that only idiots would fly with a distress beacon of adequate power?

      (Yes, people should be entitled to take whatever risks they like with their own lives, provided they understand what those are, but implicit in the concept of entitlement is that it is practical and lawful to mitigate those risks as much as possible when doing exactly the same thing. Otherwise, it is not the risk that has the entitlement, it's the activity. The risk is mandatory.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by cmowire · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, things are the other way around.

      Sufficient requirements for design and inspection make even single-engined aircraft astonishingly reliable.

      Most accidents are caused by operator error -- either fuel starvation, controlled-flight-into-terrain, or unsafe flying.

      Also, ballistic parachutes are not available for all aircraft. There needs to be an appropriate structural member for them to be attached to and the correct parachute characteristics need to be set. Only with ultralights can you buy one off the rack.

      Likewise, an emergency locater beacon generally needs to survive the accident and be triggered, either automatically or manually. These aren't built like airliner black-boxes.

    3. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by poleydee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also hope they find Steve...

      Steve also often wears a Breitling 'Emergency' watch that transmits on an emergency waveband when you pull the crown out. That obviously requires him to be conscious enough to do it.

      It's particularly amazing that something like this can happen to Steve, given his unbelievable amount of experience under extreme avaiation conditions including several emergencies.

      Steve is the most thorough, and conscientious of flyers who leaves nothing to chance, and is actually very risk-averse.

      Richard Branson was just on the news pointing out the irony of an accident when just out flying, as opposed to being on some huge feat of endeavour.

    4. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      The plane was wearing a watch?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by gluechucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      fatal crashes involving the ground (as opposed to buildings, mountains, seagulls, etc) should be relatively rare I'll be willing to bet most fatal aircraft crashes involve the ground...
    6. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He took off from a private airstrip, in the middle of nowhere. The radio was likely of little help, and disaster needn't have struck particularly fast. If his engine quit, and he made a forced landing - well, his radio may have only been set to the local airstrip's frequency. Even if he tuned to 121.5 (the emergency frequency) there is no guarantee that he would have had line of sight to an FSS antenna. That's assuming the aircraft even had a radio. Quite a few small planes don't. Quite a few small planes have really crap radios. The story I've heard is he was looking for a suitable spot to do a land speed record. This likely meant he was flying quite low, and therefore didn't have line of sight with any ground based radio. Also, as an experienced aviator, Fossett would know the priorities: AVIATE, NAVIGATE and COMMUNICATE - in that order. Fly the plane first. The plane stays airborne not on Marconi's principles, but on Bernoulli's and Newton's. Communication is the last in the list of priorities. Failing to aviate and navigate is far more likely to kill you than failing to communicate.

      I've flown over large parts of the United States where there is no radar coverage, and no one to talk to on the radio because unless you're at quite a high altitude above the terrain, there just are no ATC or FSS antennas within line of sight. I've had to revert to old fashioned position reporting in some areas of the US while flying IFR (instrument flight rules) because there was no radar coverage on my flight path for dozens of miles. Even in relatively populated parts this happens - for example, around Lufkin, Texas - there's a huge gap in radar coverage if you're below about 7,000 feet.

      ELT (Emergency Locator Transmitters) are notorious for getting activated when no emergency exists (such as a hard landing, or someone banging the side of the aircraft with their hand right by the ELT mounting), and failing to go off at all in case of an actual crash.

  7. Check Ireland by Maniakes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's where Douglas "Wrong Way" Corrigan ended up when he tried to fly from New York to California.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    1. Re:Check Ireland by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that made for one of the greatest newspaper headlines ever!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wrong_Way_Corri gan.jpg

  8. Paging Francisco D'Anconia by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps he's in a secret valley somewhere, protected by a holographic screen, with other adventurers and industrialists, plotting a takeover of the world?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  9. Re:He is such an attention whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    way to lay the pimp hand down !!!!!
      +5 Keeping it Real

  10. No idea where to look? by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd start looking on the ground.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  11. New record attempt? by Skiron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe he is trying to break the world record for the longest search party?

  12. Possibly down in one piece. by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's out in a single engine piston aircraft so if the motor went quiet, the only option would be to land.

    In theory and from what I know of Nevada's geography, finding somewhere reasonable to put the plane down shouldn't be a big issue.

    However, once down, he may be right up the middle of nowhere. You'd assume he'd just get on the radio but if it's an old Bellanca, there may be no battery power available, in a new Bellanca the fault that stopped the engine may also prevent the radio from working. Nevada's geography with raised ranges may block a radio signal in places and it may even be the case that he went out 'non-radio' as some pilots still do.

    I do rather hope he's okay but the moral here is never go x-country without 'booking-out' first even if that means just telling your friend where you're going.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by jsight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There aren't exactly a lot of "new bellancas", but if it were one, I don't really understand how that would make a difference. They still use mags, so there's nothing that would kill the engine that would also kill the radio.

      Unless you count post-crash fire. :(

    2. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      For VFR flights, flight plans are optional and very often not filed for (what are expected to be) routine flights.


      I don't know anything about this particular case, but his plane is probably equipped with an ELT which would probably be going off if he crashed. Unless he crashed really hard and broke the ELT too. (Crashing in water is another popular way of stopping them from working ...)

      Hopefully it's all much ado about nothing and he's just landed somewhere (normally) and is enjoying the local scenery, unaware that he's lost ... though I guess that's unlikely at this point.

    3. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For VFR [wikipedia.org] flights, flight plans [wikipedia.org] are optional and very often not filed for (what are expected to be) routine flights.

      I've taken enough flying classes to call BS on that. There is no such thing as a "routine flight". Hell, he could have at least phoned a friend, or one of the guys in the tower and given them a rough idea idea of where he'd be headed.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      I do rather hope he's okay but the moral here is never go x-country without 'booking-out' first even if that means just telling your friend where you're going.

      He did, at least to the extent possible. According to Yahoo's latest article:

      "We understand that Steve Fossett was flying solo and he was carrying four full tanks of gas on board. He was searching for dry and empty lake beds which might be suitable for his plan to break the land speed record."

      He didn't file a flight plan, because he didn't have a specific destination.

    5. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've done around 1200 hours of single engine flying, and I call BS on your BS. He was on a local flight to look for places for a land speed record, apparently. Not a cross country. For an experienced pilot, this is a "routine VFR flight". He likely wasn't planning on going more than about 50 nautical miles from the airfield. Pilots doing flights like that very often just preflight the aircraft, have a look at the chart to get an idea of what they are looking for, and take off. Pilots who are intimiately familiar with the terrain might not even look at the chart. They don't phone a friend any more than they'd phone a friend before driving to the grocery store in their car.

      There was no guys in the tower, the airfield he left from is a non-towered field. It's quite likely he was the only person on the airfield when he departed. Around 90% of airfields in the United States do not have a control tower.

  13. Misleading summary by rossdee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fossett may have been the first to fly SOLO around the world, but Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager flew round the world non stop without refueling in 1986.

    1. Re:Misleading summary by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank you. I also encourage people to think hard about which is really the more interesting and challenging accomplishment.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Misleading summary by Some_Llama · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I also encourage people to think hard about which is really the more interesting and challenging accomplishment."

      Obviously it's spending 9 days, 3 minutes, and 44 seconds listening to a woman nag about headwinds, proper wing tilt and hygiene.

  14. Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which gives him a good shot at safely landing the plane in an emergency. Unfortunately, if he lands in the middle of the desert, he might have a very hard time getting back to civilization before his water runs out. Also: it doesn't matter how good a pilot he is, if there was serious mechanical failure on that plane during flight he would have had to bring it down. There is no option.

    His biggest mistake: not filing that flight plan. Huge *huge* fuckup.

    1. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Nimey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His biggest mistake: not filing that flight plan. Huge *huge* fuckup.


      Quoted for truth. Private pilots, for the love of your friends and relatives, PLEASE file a flight plan whenever and wherever you fly. It's fucking hard to find a crash site if you don't know where to look and have to guess based on the aircraft's range. It's also a major waste of rescue time and resources, and you have an excellent chance of dying from exposure or injuries before you're found.

      IOW, just crash the damn airplane into a cornfield somewhere if you want to commit suicide. Leave a note first.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by slacktide · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whether or not Arizona is flat is debatable - you've obviously never been there, and my Phoenix sectional aeronautic chart, plus several trips over I-40 disagree with that postulate. However, Fosset seems to be missing over Nevada, which I assure you is quite mountainous, especially in the area 70 miles SE of Reno where he is supposed to have departed from. You may be interested in wiki-ing up some more information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountain_rang es_of_Nevada

    3. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Arizona is flat? I'm not an American but I thought the Grand Canyon was in Arizona?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  15. Re:Has anybody looked here? by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anybody tried looking here?

    Where? I get a 404: Place doesn't even exist error.

  16. Doesnt look good... by tgatliff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the other article says he took off flying a Citaborea, which means he was going up to do aerobatics because this is a quite slow airplane for anything else.... (NOTE: Citaborea means aerobatic spelled backwards). I do not remember him being an experienced aerobatic pilot, which is a considerably different skill than just being a pilot. Meaning, I feel I am a great pilot, but a not so good aerobatic pilot other than weather related recovery type turns. I would guess he probably got in a little over his head while doing aerobatics, and went down.

    I hope this is not the case, but this type of thing is fairly common in the aerobatic world. Hence, the reason why they require the use of parachute(s)...

    1. Re:Doesnt look good... by Nimey · · Score: 4, Informative

      ITYM "Citabria" (airbatic backwards). You can use them for just buzzing around; they're about the same speed as a Piper Cub and people do make (short) trips in those.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Doesnt look good... by RockyMountain · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry to nitpick, but it's not a Citaborea, it's a Citabria. It's "airbatic" spelt backwards, not "aerobatic".

      And I _very_ much doubt your claim that Steve Fossett is inexperienced in Aerobatics. On the contrary, 5 minutes browsing his biography will convince you that this man's aeronautical experience is immensely broad. It's inconceivable that someone with his tremendous breadth of flying experience and appetite for adventure never bothered to train in aerobatics.

      Just consider the number of experimental/prototype/one-of-a-kind planes he has test flown and then set records in. You don't test-fly these things without a substantial background in aerobatics.

      And I doubt that his intent for the Citabria flight involved aerobatics. Despite the name, those planes are barely capable of aerobatics at all. A Citabria is about the last choice someone of Steve's wealth and experience is likely to choose for aerobatics. Much more likely, he chose to fly a Citarbria because of the things it's _good_ for: Slow, low, relaxed, sightseeing flight, short-field takeoff and landing, etc.

      (PS I'm speaking as an aerobatic pilot myself, and also a former Citabria owner).

  17. I think I saw him... by darkonc · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think he went to Burning Man

    Last I saw him, some chick in a crotchless monkey suit had gotten him totally pissed and convinced him to rip the antenna off of his aircraft to roast wieners over the coals of The Man.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  18. Re:party time... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't worry, him and 4400 others will reappear.

  19. Geography? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nevada is not a giant dry lake bed.

    As someone who has traversed just a tiny bit of the variety of off-highway terrain Nevada/Arizona/Utah/East California has to offer, I find it doubtful he could put it down safely. If he went due north, then it doesn't get any easier to land it.

    Let's imagine for a minute he gets insanely lucky and lands without killing himself. He's exposed to some of the hottest, driest weather in the US. How much drinking water is in single-engine plane? How much water could he carry if he were crazy enough to consider walking out?

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Geography? by sweetooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Reno but grew up in a smaller town and spent much of my youth fishing and camping near where he took off from. The terrain varies quite a bit from nice long flats with no water in sight to lush valleys where the walker river and others run. The Flying M Ranch is where they were reporting him having taken off from. You have all of that type of terrain there.

      A lack of water and the generally high temperatures are probably his biggest concerns depending on where he landed. On the same token it's going to be cold tonight and it's going to be getting cooler throughout the week. The varied terrain can mean that while water is nearby it's difficult to get to. There might be a river .5 miles away there might be 3 miles in climbing up and down hills to get to it. Landing out in one of the flats could mean 30 or more miles of walking just to get to an area where there is water. Of course they are searching something like 600 miles of terrain for him according to the last local news report so who knows what exactly they think. Smaller concerns are probably rattle snakes, big cats, coyotes, etc. This is rural Nevada and there is plenty of wild life out there.

      If he did indeed take off from the Flying M and not another ranch with a private air strip then this should be the starting point for his flight:
      http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=38.611438,-119. 001675&spn=0.024178,0.040169&t=h&z=15&om=1

      Pan around the map a bit and you can see how much the terrain changes. Keep in mind that he was out looking for a place to break a land speed record and you might be able to narrow it down a bit, but it's certainly not a small area and the terrain doesn't exactly lend itself to searches.

  20. Re:Has anybody looked here? by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Funny

    if you zoom in enough, you can see the wreckage.

  21. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, Alanis, that wouldn't be "ironic." It'd be unfortunate. You don't think it's ironic for an aviation pioneer and adventurer to die on a sedate, routine flight?

    Irony
    5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
    6. the incongruity of this.

    Usage Note: The words ironic, irony, and ironically are sometimes used of events and circumstances that might better be described as simply "coincidental" or "improbable," in that they suggest no particular lessons about human vanity or folly. Thus 78 percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of ironically in the sentence In 1969 Susie moved from Ithaca to California where she met her husband-to-be, who, ironically, also came from upstate New York. Some Panelists noted that this particular usage might be acceptable if Susie had in fact moved to California in order to find a husband, in which case the story could be taken as exemplifying the folly of supposing that we can know what fate has in store for us. By contrast, 73 percent accepted the sentence Ironically, even as the government was fulminating against American policy, American jeans and videocassettes were the hottest items in the stalls of the market, where the incongruity can be seen as an example of human inconsistency. Served.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  22. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not an aviator, so I consulted Wikipedia and recalled the thing about flight plans.

    They are required in IFR (i.e., bad weather). They are not required in VFR, but are a good idea, in case this sort of thing happens.

    After taking 5 different small-craft flights in the last week (vacation), I noted that a flight plan was filed only once - in heavy traffic around Denali. Weather the rest of the time was good enough, and the flights short enough, to not require a flight plan. Plus there weren't any ATC towers in Homer, Chitina, or McCarthy.

    Also, consider that Fossett may not have known where he was going even after the plane was in the air. He might just have wanted to spend some quality time in the air with his craft, flying wherever he wanted to go.

  23. Re:Change Nevada State Motto by JamesRose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fly over with a heat sensitive camera?

  24. Other stories are available..... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  25. He's gone home. by QMO · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's obvious that he isn't human at all.

    It's just that his vacation time ran out.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  26. That's "Citabria" by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citabria

    First I heard it was "aerobatic" backwards.

    I only read the linked article, it didn't say which Bellanca. Super Viking would have been a decent choice, but I'll check again for the linked articles.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  27. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by delcielo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As mentioned by others, a flight plan is not required for VFR flight. There are reasons for this (and yes, they are debatable); but it is generally considered that even if they aren't required, they are wise. Statistically, you are found faster if you have one on file. The authorities are pretty good about tracking the overdue planes and initiating search and rescue. As somebody else mentioned, it is a good idea to at least check in with a family member before leaving and again when arriving. I call it, filing with Dad.

    If you're not on a cross-country flight, a flight plan is not much use.

    As for beacons, every airplane has an ELT (emergency locator transmitter) that sends a signal on 121.5Mhz. Satellites listen for that signal and are monitored by (I believe) the Air Force, which initiates search and rescue. The ELT is activated by an impact of 5 g's. Transient g-loads which build and dissipate very rapidly can inadvertently activate them at times. It's a dubious honor to have set one off with a hard landing. On the other hand, it's possible for the ELT to be damaged in an accident, or to lose the antenna for it in an accident, etc.

    Mr. Fosset was a smart man, and obviously had filled fellow pilots/friends in on his intentions. They alerted search and rescue a few short hours after he intended to return. So, to say that his lack of a flight plan was a "huge fuckup" is perhaps a bit harsh. All the search and rescue efforts that would have been activated by the overdue flight plan are in fact, activated.

    I wish him well. That's a hostile environment he is in.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  28. That guy was awesome. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Screw Lindy...When denied a permit for a transatlantic flight because your hand-built airplane (cost 900 dollars) is deemed unflyable, make the flight anyway, and then claim you got "lost."

    The guy made the flight with a couple of candy bars and a bottle of water, and a fuel leak inside the cockpit which he knew about before he left, but didn't fix because he didn't want to miss his flight window.

    It's that fine line between bravery and stupidity; he lived, so he was brave.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  29. Ok, it's a Super Decathalon... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    This aircraft is "capable" of aerobatics - even inverted flight (it's main edge over the Decathalon), but it's really just an extremely rugged hi-wing tandem.

    A great Bush plane actually, I wouldn't assume he was going up to do aerobatics based upon that.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Ok, it's a Super Decathalon... by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 2, Funny

      A great Bush plane actually, I wouldn't assume he was going up to do aerobatics based upon that.

      In the sense that it gets lost in the desert and has no exit strategy?
      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  30. "controlled-flight-into-terrain".. by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also known as "Cumulus Granite"

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  31. Uh Oh by Atmchicago · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like Fossett may have gone down the drain. Water we going to do about it!? If we want to find him we may have to tap all our resources.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  32. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a loaded statement. There are plenty of things in the world more dangerous than a GA aircraft. For example: a motorcycle, a chainsaw, a lawnmower. GA aircraft have a slightly poorer record than cars in terms of fatalities per hour, and a much better record in terms of accidents per hour. The vast majority of GA accidents have little to do with the mechanical condition of the plane, and much more to do with stupid things done by the user (imagine that).

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  33. Analysis by stoicio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depending on the type of single engine aircraft he would have
    2 to 5 hours of duration.

    An article suggests that he told a friend that he would return by noon.
    He left at 9 A.M.

    If he only took enough fuel to get to his waypoint and return then
    his total expected duration would be 3 hours.

    This means his expected outbound waypoint should be within 1.5 hours
    of departure.

    If he's flying something like a cessna 170, his top speed is ~140 MPH.

    If we calculate for 160 MPH to take into account either foolhardiness
    or massive tail wind, his maximum distance should be in a circular radius
    of 240 miles.

    From that information he could be almost anywhere in Nevada.
    He could be in California. Or he may have made it as far as
    Arizona, Utah, Idaho, or Washington.

    It would be easiest to find him by reading his day-timer,
    checking his old phone messages, looking in his car, and phoning
    everyone he knows (friends/family/recent business) and mapping
    their positions. Perhaps his most frequent destinations from previous
    flight plans would also help.

    This should reduce the search area substantially and possibly give
    some insights into what he may have been doing/thinking when he left.

    There doesn't appear to be any mention of technical details
    regarding aircraft type, fuel purchase, or his heading after takeoff.

  34. Re:No he wasn't by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes he was. There were two in Voyager, so each only flew it half-way.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  35. Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bearing in mind the guy might be dead, I find it a bit distasteful we're laughing about it.
    He may or may not have been stupid or suicidal or whatever, but for the sake of his family, friends etc, can we stop making cheap fucking jokes about it.