Slashdot Mirror


What Your Favorite Web Sites Say About You

Jimmy writes to tell us that CNET is running an article on what your favorite Web sites say about you. One example takes a look at the possible origins of Facebook readers; "The typical Facebookers are what you'd get if YouTube and Flickr went halves on a baby. Yes, the site was created to help university students connect and have a good time, but connecting and having a good time generally involves unruly, drunken behavior, which is inevitably caught on film and posted for your entire friends list to see.'" The article also takes a look at eBay, Flickr, Slashdot, and several others.

40 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Not very interesting.... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA: The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system. Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.

    If you read the other entries, it is less an info piece and more of a fluff piece for c/net to blow their own horn when you get to the end. How do articles like this get posted to Slashdot?

    That said, while there are those of us that have been around since '98 or so, many Slashdot users that started participating in this forum back have continued to participate and additionally have created their own blogs. All in all, I'd have to say that whether or not I visit a website says less about me than the content that goes into my blog does.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Not very interesting.... by everphilski · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you read the other entries, it is less an info piece and more of a fluff piece for c/net to blow their own horn when you get to the end. How do articles like this get posted to Slashdot?

      you think the mods made it to the /. entry? :)

    2. Re:Not very interesting.... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, cause it's not like being a geek has little to do with appearance. Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    3. Re:Not very interesting.... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, it's obviously tongue in cheek.

      Did you read the bit about CNET?


      CNET.co.uk attracts a wide variety of users but they almost always have one thing in common: they're gorgeous. Oh, and they like technology. Sure, they use MySpace, Facebook and once, misguidedly, even created a Twitter account (but they're sorry for that last part).

      They're the best sort of people to be around. They're highly educated, well-travelled and they possess the sort of qualities every mother tries to instil in her child. They'll one day go on to broker world peace, cure the incurable and are the very reason we wake up for work in the mornings. They're great and we love them all. Even the ones who think we sold them something and ring us up to complain.


      Don't start trying to fact check a joke piece...Unless you're doing some meta-humor by living up to their "Suspicion and Pedantry" snark.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Not very interesting.... by Jennifer+York · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The reason this gets posted is because it's a list. The fscking "List" format blog posts are driving me mad.
      "10 ways to..."
      "6 not so smart cats"
      "30 things to do with..."

      The structure is so simple: The headline hook writes itself, and the content can be complete horseshit but once it hits digg, you've got a front page post.

      I challenge you to try it: go to flickr, grab ten random photos based on a meta tag. Assemble them in a list, with perhaps some witty comments, but even that's not needed. Get five friends to digg it.

      Wait for the traffic storm to hit.

    5. Re:Not very interesting.... by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely.

      The one thing that some of us who've been around long will remember is that apart from the dupes and the bad editing, Slashdot has changed a lot over the years.

      When it started out, it was for geeks of a certain age and demographic. Over the years, those users have grown up, and with them, so has Slashdot.

      Compare the number of actual technology articles from the older versions of Slashdot with the number of articles relating to business, politics and management of technology on today's Slashdot. Slashdot has broadened its horizons, and the discussions tend to be a lot more balanced (if you do not believe me, just go over to Digg and see the trolls and the flamebaits out there).

      And yes, the average Slashdotter was (and is) probably a geek or a nerd, but I think that as they have matured, so has the website? Do we see the occasional crap posting and foam-at-the-mouth zealotry? Of course. But compared to the amount of actual, sane discussion, the percentage of idiocy is surprisingly less.

      Secondly, Slashdot is not just about the main articles - it is also about the posters having their journals and having sub-communities of posters.

      Over simplification and stereotyping has been the bane of many an analysis, and this article (if it can be called that) is no different.

      Bleh.

    6. Re:Not very interesting.... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      5 ways to piss off Slashdot readers:

      1.) Post a question that is answered in the summary (or better yet, the title).
      2.) Use a Slashdot meme in an unfunny way.
      3.) Be kdawson.
      4.) Post obvious karma whores, such as "text of article in case of Slashdotting".
      5.) Write your comments in list form.

    7. Re:Not very interesting.... by cortesoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! They are so wrong... I am a 24 year old male, thank you very much.

    8. Re:Not very interesting.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...are filled with almost nothing but +5 Funny comments.

      I use my +3 shield of suspicion and +2 helm of sarcasm to counter that.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Not very interesting.... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Funny

      6.) Now I know you're going to mod me down for this, but...

      As far as #2 and #5 are concerned, in Soviet Slashdotistan, lists write you!

    10. Re:Not very interesting.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Number three only works for those of you who haven't already blocked kdawson from the front page, and if you haven't then you deserve to be pissed off.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Not very interesting.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Funny

      The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

      Hrm.. looks down... yep definately breasts... and not man-breasts either...

      Looks at nick and sig file... they got it part right about the Windoze reference...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  2. My favorite site by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite site is one that posts noninsightful stories with titles designed to grab maximum nerd traffic and also lacks a print link to let said nerds bypass the ten pages of ads.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:My favorite site by jd · · Score: 2

      You're either looking at the adult pages or a commercial news website.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. They bismirch /. Gasp!!! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
    They claim slashdot users pounce on hapless writer or reporter and trash them using pedantry and anonymity according to that site. Come on guys, let us show them what is real ripping to shreds is. Show no mercy! Attack!

    Scotty load the missles.

    Aye Sir, fully loaded with 25 Gigatons of sarcasm

    Add pedantry

    Yes sir, 45 Teratons of pedantry added

    And some anonymity too

    Aye Sir, anothe 12457 Teratons of anonymity added

    Fire at the abominable site

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  4. 10 pages of advertisements? by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Funny

    10 pages of advertisements, check
    no printer friendly page link, check
    no interest in reading this article, check.

    No thanks slashdot. Next?

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
  5. Target Audience by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every site has its target audience just like almost every corporation does. All this seems to be doing is defining the target audience. If Slashdot's website wasn't based on "News for Nerds stuff that matters" then I bet there would be less geeks and nerds on this site... that is what digg is for.

    The website doesn't make your personality your personality choses to revisit the website.

  6. IP Violation by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the hell'd they get my prom photo for the Slashdot page?

  7. Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, let me get this straight....

    A list of what I like says something about me.

    Truly, is there no bounds to what science can reveal?

    I am well and truly stunned.

    1. Re:Wow! by everphilski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your new science intrigues me. Tell me again how sheeps bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes?

  8. INSULTING PICTURE by cromar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses.

    How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!?

    1. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by dal20402 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!?

      On the Internet, no one knows you're a god.

    2. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by kv9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!? On the Internet, no one knows you're a god. on ze internets nobody noes your german
  9. All of the above. by king-manic · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you frequent all of them would you then be an EMO, uber geek, trivia nerd, photographer, with an antique obsession, who enjoys poorly made video blogs, and gets smashed reguarly with your college buddies, while constantly chatting about nothing with low self esteem, whilst also enjoy shilling for a has been tech blog?

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:All of the above. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you frequent all of them would you then be an EMO, uber geek, trivia nerd, photographer, with an antique obsession, who enjoys poorly made video blogs, and gets smashed reguarly with your college buddies, while constantly chatting about nothing with low self esteem, whilst also enjoy shilling for a has been tech blog?

      There's a site for those. It's called "digg".

  10. And finally, CNET readers: by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're the best sort of people to be around. They're highly educated...

    and almost NSFW!

  11. AD-FREE VERSION by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Behold!, the article is slightly more reader-friendly. Still not worth reading, though...

  12. Missing entry: 4chan.org by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    4chan.org
    What's the story?
    4chan.org is an increasingly popular hangout for those who call themselves 'Anonymous'. It breeds misfits, criminals, and The Internet Hate Machine, which is a term that is used to describe the collective processing power of the thousands of hackers on steroids who frequent the site.
    Did you know?
    Disturbingly, 4chan.org is the source of almost every popular internet 'meme' that has surfaced since 2004 or so.
    What 4chan.org says about you
    If your favorite site is 4chan.org, you're a terrorist who likes to blow up vans, and should be locked away for a very, very long time. You also like to say 'LULZ' a lot, which is a diabolical corruption of 'LOL', which means 'Let's Order Linguini' ... 'Linguini' being a street term for crack cocaine.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rules 1 & 2...

  13. My sites says... by svendsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I need major therapy and a healthier outlook on sexual fantasies....

  14. Re:So... by Kelson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, this is saying if you join a community/website then you are probably inclined to be interested or involved in whatever the subject matter that site is.

    Actually, it's describing a caricature of each site's target audience. It's more of a humor piece than anything else.

  15. Slashdot is more diverse by athloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.

    I know you're just doing it for the laughs, guys, but that's short-sighted. Slashdot is one of the more diverse (in terms of opinions, not genetics and gender) web sites I've run across, much more so than myspace, for example. Libertarian Christians and Mac-using bisexual Buddhists can agree on the necessary traits for any BIND replacement here without much rancor.

    I think the article sells it short.

    1. Re:Slashdot is more diverse by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best candidate for a BIND replacement? Definitely emacs.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  16. Not very accurate either by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm 28, athletic, and my first +5 post (or at least, the first one I remember) was in defense of windows security, which indicates that at least 4 other people agreed that windows is OK as an OS. I don't wear glasses and I am married to a woman who is pretty high on the physical attractiveness scale (and yes, I have had sex with her).

    I think I am probably also pretty indicative Slashdotters. I think that the slashdot comment system is a pretty good way to hold authors accountable for what they write, and anonymity is no shield since the moderation system is pretty good at filtering bullshitters out (although not perfect).

    It sounds to me like this author is your typical tech journalist who graduated with a C average from some no-name school, has brought the same mediocre performance to his job, and has been called for it on slashdot. Now, he's bitter.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:Not very accurate either by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Things to note. 1. "12oz curls" is not "athletic". Neither are any actions accomplished in a virtual sense. 2. +5 post can be +5 funny so maybe they were just laughing at you 3. Not wearing glasses doesn't mean you don't need them. 4. "high on the physical attractiveness scale" doesn't mean much if you do need glasses 5. I won't even touch the moderation system. 6. It sounds to me like this poster is your typical slashdot poster that didn't RTFA and realize the whole thing is a damned joke.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  17. Begin Infinite Recursion by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

    That's a stereotypical response.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Begin Infinite Recursion by djh101010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

      That's a stereotypical response.
      Yeah, yeah...your type always says that.
    2. Re:Begin Infinite Recursion by booyabazooka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Figures. Slashdotters always carry these jokes on far too long.

  18. What?! When did they start talking?? Oh God...... by notclevernickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are they saying?? Look it is not true.... It was only that one time, I was only looking for the failed Donkey Kong tv show... I didn't know that searching for "donkey show" in Google would bring that up....

    --
    Free porn, no Bullshit - thebestlinklist.com
  19. Re:So.... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Funny

    if my favorite sites were 2 girls 1 cup

    I'm disgusted!! Don't they know the difference between a cup and a tumbler?!?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.