Slashdot Mirror


Electric Motorcycle Inventor Crashes at Wired Conference

not5150 writes "The inventor of the electric 'KillaCycle" motorcycle was taken to the hospital for x-rays after demonstrating the vehicle to reporters. Bill Dube, a government scientist during the day and bike builder at night, attempted a burnout in front of the Los Angeles Convention Center during the Wired NextFest fair. Fueled by the "most powerful" lithium-ion batteries in the world, the bike accelerated uncontrollably into another car. There's a video interview (thankfully before the crash) and footage of Dube crashing."

47 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Electric Motorcycle + Wired by deniable · · Score: 5, Funny

    My first thought was that he ran over the extension lead.

  2. some pictures by juventasone · · Score: 4, Informative

    While the slashdot effect kills the video, there's some pictures and comments at gizmodo

  3. More seriously, though by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a professional stuntman, I can't stress enough how dangerous it is to perform these kinds of antics without appropriate training, preparation, and room.

    The fact that he hit a parked minivan tells me quite a bit about the kinds of stupid risks he was taking. He's lucky that he's the only one that got hurt.

    1. Re:More seriously, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Performing burnouts on a motorcycle is not difficult. There's a little something called a clutch that makes it pretty safe. In the video you can hear him (or someone) say 'it actually stuck on', which I assume means he couldn't cut the power to the wheel.

      In fact, the only stupid risk he took was not wearing a helmet. What sort of a dick rides a bike without a helmet? (Hint: 'a freedom loving dick' is not an acceptable answer.)

    2. Re:More seriously, though by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a little something called a clutch that makes it pretty safe.

      I suspect, being electric, this wouldn't have a clutch.

      In fact, the only stupid risk he took was not wearing a helmet. What sort of a dick rides a bike without a helmet?

      To be fair, he was attempting a burnout - going over the handlebars at high speed isn't usually a big hazard when you're stationary with the back wheel spinning.

    3. Re:More seriously, though by heinousjay · · Score: 4, Funny

      A dick who makes his own decisions and deals with the consequences.

      I'm aware that's a synonym for freedom loving.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:More seriously, though by pyat · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can have slip within the electric motor, so it can behave like an electromagnetic clutch. This can be pretty handy:

      On diesel railway locomotives, they have a diesel engine that generates electricity, which is then used to power electric motors on the wheels. One reason for this arrangement is that using electric motors like this means you don't need a clutch and it's more compact than a fully mechanical transmission for such huge power would be.

    5. Re:More seriously, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A dick who makes his own decisions and deals with the consequences.

      And who drives up insurance costs for the rest of the riders who do wear helmets.

    6. Re:More seriously, though by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In fact, the only stupid risk he took was not wearing a helmet. What sort of a dick rides a bike without a helmet? (Hint: 'a freedom loving dick' is not an acceptable answer.) I take offense at your usage of the word "dick". To me, a "dick" is a person who, through malice, indifference, or stupidity, adversely affects someone else.

      So someone who permits a 10 year old to ride with him without a helmet is being a "dick". Someone who decides for himself not to wear one is at worst a "fool".

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    7. Re:More seriously, though by mabinogi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I must say, I've never seen a slang nazi before.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    8. Re:More seriously, though by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a professional stuntman, Wow, that preface to a statement must be great for picking up women.

      And yes, I'm serious, not mocking.
    9. Re:More seriously, though by rah1420 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What sort of a dick rides a bike without a helmet?

      They call that sort of dick "organ donor."

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    10. Re:More seriously, though by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      "And who drives up insurance costs for the rest of the riders who do wear helmets"

      Complete myth. I can attest to this. We used to be free in Louisiana to choose to wear a helmet or not. New Gov. Blanco (aka Blank-Stare after katrina) repealed the law.

      We now have to wear helmets. However, the insurance rates for motorcycle riders (or even auto) did not go down one cent.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:More seriously, though by lavaboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      first rule of riding bikes: Dress for the crash, not the trip.

      --
      Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
    12. Re:More seriously, though by krbvroc1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are missing the fundamental 'Law of Insurance and Gas prices'. Rising costs are quick to be passed on the consumer, but when costs go down, the savings are pocketed by the company as long as possible.

    13. Re:More seriously, though by HardCase · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're searching for dicks?

      Not that there's anything wrong with that...

  4. KillaCycle? by kooky45 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does what it says on the tin.

  5. Re:0-60 in less than a second by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a drag bike. After you do the quarter mile you slow down & stop.

    --
    Deleted
  6. Re:0-60 in less than a second by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Funny

    0-60 in less than a second


    and vice versa
  7. Finally by sc0ob5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A product that can actually live up to it's name.

  8. Idiot by infonick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a scientist, he should have known better than to not wear a helmet....

    --

    You are confusing me with someone who cares.
    1. Re:Idiot by mpe · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a scientist, he should have known better than to not wear a helmet....

      Calling the thing "KillaCycle" probably wasn't the smartest of ideas either. It sounds more like the title of a low budget horror movie...

    2. Re:Idiot by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Balls... and heart where his mouth is and all that.

      Thankfully it wasn't that bad a crash ! :-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  9. Re:0-60 in less than a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well its not like you can only apply the power gradually like a petrol engine.

    Of course you can. Do you have an electric fan? Does it always run at full speed? Or is there a little switch that lets you adjust the fan speed?

    My understanding is that when you turn an electric engine on, that's it, full power full torque.

    No. Electric motors can do that (which is nice in many applications), but they don't have to do that. It depends on how much voltage/current goes to the electric motor, and it's pretty easy to control voltage & current.

  10. Re:0-60 in less than a second by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember aerodynamics too, 60-120 won't be as fast as 0-60 even with the same torque being applied. It does sounds awesome though, even if the inventor can't ride it

    --
    which is totally what she said
  11. Just needed stiches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    from the comments on the linked page:

    I wasn't wearing a helment, because we did not intend the bike to even move!

    We were spinning the tire in soapy water. The tire unexpectantly gripped, (water ran out?) and launched the bike. I couldn't get it shut down as quickly as I would have liked. I had to release the front brake to fully untwist the throttle. I then managed to slow it down to about 20 mph.

    The positive message here is that when we crunched the battery pack, NOTHING happened. No smoke. No flames. Not even sparks. Not only are these cells more powerful, they are are the safest possible for automobiles.

    Also, there was NO ONE in front of the bike or in the possible trajectory of the bike.

    Bill Dube

    1. Re:Just needed stiches by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      No sparks? No flames? Dudew, you should have added some pyros to the bike, even if you never intended it to move, to give people something to photograph. Same reason early computers were dressed in lights. Sheesh, talk about a missed opporutinity.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Just needed stiches by ahoehn · · Score: 3, Informative

      The fact that you can run thie Lithium battery pack into the side of a car and have nothing happen to it is quite impressive.

      The Slashdot crowd is already familiar with exploding laptop batteries, and electric RC news groups are filled with horror stories of houses and cars burning down from LiPo batteries that "randomly" burst into flame. Just this weekend my brother-in-law and I flew our electric RC planes with LiPo packs in them. On the way back into the house, he dropped a battery pack on the sidewalk from about 3 feet in the air. It instantly started spewing smoke and flames, and kept going for about a minute. We were lucky that it was sitting on concrete.

      The moral of the story is, I wouldn't trust anything as volitile as the LiPo's that I use for RC sitting between my legs or in the trunk of my car. While the injury is unfortunate, the publicity of a safe LiPo might do good things for the KillaCycle.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  12. In other news by iamacat · · Score: 4, Funny

    The motorcyclist was using Sony cells and also suffered a bad burn to the groin.

  13. Free press? by Alystair · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is actually very good free press for them, hope he recovers quick. Media loves accidents.

  14. GLAYVIN! by Mad+Martigan · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why Professor Frink's motorcycle flies through the air -- no cars to hit.

    -----

    Frink tests his new flying motorcycle.

    Frink: Hello, son. You want to try the flying motorcycle I just invented?
    Bart: No time.
    Frink: Okay.

    Later, Bart loses his skateboard in the wet cement.

    Bart: I could sure use that flying motorcycle now.

    Frink flies by.

    Frink: You had your chance. Whoa-hai.

    -----

  15. Quote of the Video by adamkennedy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm normally the crew chief and the owner, I don't ride it."

    I was already going "oh dear..."

  16. Killa-Minivan by Nymz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if it'a KillaCycle, motorcycle, bicycle, or even a small car, because none of them are safe as long as they share the road with vehicles that are relatively so much more massive. If we want to realistically promote more efficient modes of transportation, then we should work to make the current hostile enviroments into safer ones.

    Before you flame, I'm aware he wasn't wearing a helmet, was showing off with a burn out, was riding an prototype vehicle, and that the minivan was a parked. But instead of addressing the rare occurance this incident was, I wanted to address a common occurance, and provide a solution that we could actually take steps toward achieving.

    1. Re:Killa-Minivan by TheJodster · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know if you can make the roads safe for motorcycles of any kind, unfortunately. I was a long time rider and cycle enthusiast. I had lots of good safety gear, lights all over my bike, etc. I had taken safety courses with hands on crash avoidance scenarios. Last year an idiot woman in an SUV launched herself from a side road like she was on a suicide mission to get across the four lane divided highway where I was riding. She crushed my leg which they nearly had to amputate; broke my ribs which consequently punctured my lungs; ripped a hole in my small intestine; tore my abdominal wall to the point where I now have a piece of kevlar mesh holding my organs in on the right side. It's been a year and a half and I almost walk normally now. I was wearing a full face helmet that hit the ground repeatedly as I flew through the median.

      I got a twelve day stay in an ICU, four major surguries, four months in the hospital, a year of rehab, more than a half million US dollars in medical bills, and pain that I would never wish on anyone. She got a ticket for failure to yield right of way and a new SUV.

      If you want to ride a bike on the highways in the U.S. beware that the consequences of the bad judgement of the drooling idiots you share the road with is extremely high. The helmet will ensure that you remain concious throughout the ordeal... if you are lucky... and if you aren't, at least your wife, kids, parents, or whatever will be able to have an open casket funeral.

      --
      A little misunderstanding? Galileo and the Pope had a little misunderstanding...
  17. Re:0-60 in less than a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're erroneously assuming a constant acceleration: real-world dragstrip acceleration-time plots are anything but linear.

    As to the time, 0-60 in 1 second is standard for drag cars or bikes running in the 7s on the quarter mile.

    1/4 mile times like that are pretty good for an electric vehicle though.

  18. Other Videos by gbickford · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here is a mirror of video of the crash: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2984983237984172859.

    There are a lot of videos of the thing in action at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=KillaCycle. The thing is clearly not a scooter

    It's really a bummer that he decided not to wear a helmet.

  19. Re:0-60 in less than a second by dwater · · Score: 4, Funny

    what? less than a second in 0-60??? what does that mean?

    --
    Max.
  20. Electric has grown up. by Futselaar · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a while, we have had electric cars and motorcycles that could go fast and reasonably far. Being able to crash them stupidly was probably the final thing needed to make them a success. And now that electric bikes have grown up to this level, linux on the desktop cannot be far off, can it?

  21. Re:0-60 in less than a second by mpe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well its not like you can only apply the power gradually like a petrol engine. My understanding is that when you turn an electric engine on, that's it, full power full torque.

    You can vary the amount of power sent to the motor, it is also possible to have motors with switchable windings to give different torque and speed settings. In the case of a vehicle such as a car or motorbike an electric motor can be connected via the same sort of gearbox you'd use with an internal combustion engine. Indeed the only real difference between a regular motorcycle and an all electric one is that the latter wouldn't need a starter.

  22. Re:0-60 in less than a second by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes and no.

    You can't easily apply gradually more power with high-power engines running on AC.

    There are numerous tricks like switching configuration of the coils, using high-power thyrystors etc. You can't just put some resistance because it would be enormously wasteful. Some railway engines use "convert 1-phase AC from the wire to DC, then convert back to three-phase AC of desired frequency" making them actually more efficient than running on 1-phase AC straight from the wire.

    But not in this case. The batteries produce DC. They can be switched one at a time to limit voltage(->torque) if it's a DC motor, or the conversion to AC can be freely configured providing frequency (->RPM) just as desired if the motor is AC.

    (also note using all kinds of resistors, pots and other "power drains" for limiting current/voltage when such powers are in use, are useless - they would have to dissipate (and waste) enormous amounts of power. Devices that limit the "average" voltage by dutycycle method ( x% of a milisecond on, 100-x% of a milisecond time off => x% power) are much better but not every kind of end-target device can accept this kind of power, plus it generates lots of electromagnetic noise from all the instant on-off action )

    Simply put, getting limiting voltage by a half in a 5V 10mA DC configuration is trivial - wasting 0.25W of power is not a problem. In 500V 10A DC configuration is very tricky. Dissipating 2500W is not really an option.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  23. Best wishes, but come on buddy, common sense by fantomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Best wishes, I hope you get better soon.

    But come on buddy, a little common sense, and remember you're a role model. *You* might have known what you're doing but lots of idiot teenagers would have been watching the footage of you doing this gig and other ones similar to it. They might take home the message that it's ok not to wear helmet and body armour. The fact that something did go wrong showed that you weren't completely in control.

    Please, even if you're happy taking those risks, wear a helmet and body protection. You wouldn't use DIY power tools at home without safety gear so why take risks with your superbike? You seem like a nice guy, stick around for a bit longer so you can pick up your Darwin award and don't encourage idiot teenagers (or adults) to think its ok to do burns on stationary bikes without protection. You've just proved that it's not safe...

    1. Re:Best wishes, but come on buddy, common sense by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 4, Funny

      But come on buddy, a little common sense, and remember you're a role model. *You* might have known what you're doing but lots of idiot teenagers would have been watching the footage of you doing this gig and other ones similar to it. They might take home the message that it's ok not to wear helmet and body armour. The fact that something did go wrong showed that you weren't completely in control.

      Won't somebody PLEASE think of the CHILDREN!!!???

  24. Re:0-60 in less than a second by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if its a 3 phase short circuit engine, which is likely, the torque goes down quick as rpm goes up. When rpm=0 its basically a short circuit condition, it will pull whatever power it can get (and handle for a short period of time).

  25. Wow, a "Drag" bike crashes on "TGVideo"... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe that got by my works proxy-server.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  26. No helmet? by beavis88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, this guy is smart enough to design and build this bike in his spare time, but not to buy a fucking helmet??

  27. Re:0-60 in less than a second by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno. Probably something about parsecs.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  28. Re:0-60 in less than a second by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You know...I've thought it would be pretty cool to own an electric car like the Tesla. But, I've also lamented that the lack of 'sound' would be a drawback. I mean, a high powered car, is fun not only due to the torque and acceleration, but, that noise coming off a finely tuned exhaust is part of the thrill.

    Taking that in mind when I read this...I thought "Ok, I could maybe get by with a fairly silent car, but, NO WAY would this make a motorcycle fun"!!

    I mean, that IS a huge part of the fun of a big cruiser bike. I'm not talking about straight pipes here...I know those annoy some people. I like loud things, but, I do try to respect my neighbors. But, really, first thing I think of when I get a new bike...is what aftermarket pipes I'm gonna get...to give me that rumble as I drive it.

    I think an electric bike would be kinda boring in that respect. Sure, I guess you could sync some mp3's of good engine/exhaust notes with the motor...but, still.....something would be missing.

    Hell..many people buy the Harley JUST for the "potato...potato...potato.." engine note and rumble. Didn't they even try to patent that?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........