Slashdot Mirror


Another Man Dies After Marathon Gaming Session

loserMcloser writes "Another Chinese man has died after spending three days in an internet cafe for an online gaming marathon session. He apparently fainted and died at the cafe from exhaustion. 'The report did not say what the man, whose name was not given, was playing. The report said that about 100 other Web surfers "left the cafe in fear after witnessing the man's death."'"

22 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. oblig. futurama by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scruffy gonna die the way he lived

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:oblig. futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you die in the real world, you die in the game!

  2. And the culprit is .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the lead paint on the game controller.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  3. anyone else hear that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the sound of Jack Thompson creaming his pants

    1. Re:anyone else hear that by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whats the problem?

      He'll just respawn back at the entrance.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:anyone else hear that by chemisus · · Score: 5, Funny
  4. But is it true? by cduffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is coming from state-run media, it doesn't contain enough details for easy independent verification -- and the state has indicated that combating "Internet addiction" is one of its goals.

    There's a lack of truthiness here.

  5. Re:$5 says... by njfuzzy · · Score: 5, Funny
    So technically that means he died at work? Go figure.

    What? It did say he was Chinese, right?

    What?

    ...I'm just sayin'.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  6. Re:Wonder why.. by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, it *IS* the most populated place in the world... racial differences notwithstanding, statistically the odds are that for any given random human trait, you are most likely to find it there in the highest quantity.

  7. Mega Kill!!! by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 5, Funny

    Double Kill
    Multi Kill
    Mega Kill!
    ULTRA KILL!!
    M-m-m-monster Kill.
    LUDACRIS KILL!
    H O L Y S H I T!

    R E A L I T Y KILL!!!!!

  8. Microsoft Vista Prevents this Problem by 517714 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The (lack of) stability of the Operating System prevents running a computer for such marathon sessions.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  9. Doesn't happen here? by king-manic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm an Asian gamer with a mild addiction to warcraft 3. I don't understand how Asia can have a few of these incidents and the west has so none.Is there a distinct cultural difference to explain this? Or is it just statistic's? There i about 2.5 billion people in Asia proper vs 1 billion in all of the west. I don't understand how addiction is going to force you to sleep or drink or eat. I suppose I don't understand because all of my addictions are mild and state endorsed (women, video games, food, and tea).

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  10. Re:$5 says... by slughead · · Score: 5, Funny

    >He died playing WoW. Do I have any takers?

    If that were true, I'd say his life just improved.

  11. Re:And I thought ... by nelsonal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd guess it's one of two things, either he's earning money by farming loot and if he logs/leaves he will reduce his income substantially (because someone else will get his location or it takes a long time to reach). Or he's really just on the receiving end of a variable schedule reward system and he misses the dopamine hits too much to leave.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  12. Chinese != Korean by ToastyKen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did I miss something? As far as I've heard, the only other case of death from gaming exhausting happened in Korea, but the submitter says "another Chinese man"...

  13. Re:$5 says... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, the first Marathon was fatal.

    Nobody ever learns from history.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  14. Re:Only one thing to do then .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, the last thing they would be expecting is the Spanish Inquisition.

  15. Re:Not really an epidemic by GrayCalx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, some people are addicted to computer games, some are addicted to gravity...

    I tried going off gravity cold turkey... I crashed hard.

    /I'm here all week... tip your mods.

  16. Backfiring of "one child per family" policy by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I heard a really good article a few weeks ago on NPR where sociologists were looking into the root cause of internet/gaming addiction in China. One interesting theory is that this generation of gamers is the product of the "one child per family" policy in China. Essentially this generation in China is full of only-children. This is bound to cause social issues, and this internet/gaming addiction is only a symptom of a larger sociological problem.

  17. Re:Only one thing to do then .. by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 5, Funny

    the standard metric unit of illegality

    I propose the "hijink."

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  18. Re:Only one thing to do then .. by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gun control basically is the same thing: for a gun to really be a problem one must already be prepared to break the law. So given that a willingness to break the law is already a prerequisite for a gun crime to take place: do you really think that the culprit is gonna give a damn that he's breaking a law by obtaining or carrying a gun?

    To put it into Slashdot terms: it would be like the government outlawing encryption to prevent terrorists from communicating. If they're talking about blowing up a building do you really think they are afraid to have a copy of PGP installed on their computer? Nope. All outlawing encryption does is take it away from the people who were originally using it for non-illegal purposes, or make criminals out of those who refuse to give it up even if their original actions were perfectly legal. Same applies to guns.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  19. Re:Only one thing to do then .. by theridersofrohan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gun control basically is the same thing: for a gun to really be a problem one must already be prepared to break the law. So given that a willingness to break the law is already a prerequisite for a gun crime to take place: do you really think that the culprit is gonna give a damn that he's breaking a law by obtaining or carrying a gun? That argument has two major holes:

    a) It is assuming that people are rational beings and that all actions are well premeditated. It's pretty well known by now that people are irrational (hey, how's that for a slashdot audience, this is a blog entry by the gmail creator!). Basically, in a surge of emotion (think domestic fights, a depressed / severely stressed kid (say a highschool shooting)), if one can easily have access to guns (by opening the local cabinet, going to a store, etc.), they can cause massively more damage, significantly more easily.

    b) That the massive number of guns going around in a society will always be used by the people they were intended in the way they were intended. This is patently not true, as demonstrated by kids getting access to their grandfather's gun, or various people we (the west) have massively funded and provided guns to (think Bin Laden and the Mujahideen's in Afganistan vs the Soviets, or Saddam versus the Iranians).

    There's also, of course, a moral argument. The only primary purpose of the gun is to kill. The whole protection stuff is completely secondary; a gun 'protects' by killing, or threatening to kill. I, personally, think that society has an obligation to protect its citizens, and banning a device the purpose of which is to kill is a good idea.

    Guns don't kill people, people kill people. And monkeys kill people. If you give them a gun. (to quote eddie izzard)