Slashdot Mirror


Heinlein Archives Put Online

RaymondRuptime writes "Good news for fans of the late SF master Robert Heinlein, 2 months after his 100th birthday celebration. Per the San Jose Mercury News, 'The entire contents of the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Archive — housed in the UC-Santa Cruz Library's Special Collections since 1968 — have been scanned in an effort to preserve the contents digitally while making the collection easily available to both academics and the general public... The first collection released includes 106,000 pages, consisting of Heinlein's complete manuscripts — including files of all his published works, notes, research, early drafts and edits of manuscripts.' You can skip the brief article and go straight to the archives."

49 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. For real? by commlinx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or was permission to publish just a Grumble from the Grave?

    1. Re:For real? by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He realised the "value" of such archives much more than other people.

      Just read the Lazarus rant in "Time Enough for Love" when he understands for the first time that his pearls of wisdom are being recorded.

      So I think he is more likely laughing than grumbling. After all he said (though Lazarus): "Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil."

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:For real? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True.
      He also put in his bequeathing to UCSC that there was one work not to be published... Ever. I haven't the time to search the archive to see if it's there, and at the moment the title escapes me, so I'll have to dig in my annual collection and look up the title (My most prized copy of ?compton's SF? some rag that was carrying RAH's first serials.)

      Anyway, I hope they honor his wishes about this. He declared it his single worst story ever, never to be re-printed. He's fairly spot on in his assessment.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:For real? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes that would be it, but I fail to remember the title. My collection is sealed in an inert atmosphere*, so getting to it is dicey.
      -nB

      *Yes I'm a geek, but old ragstock is known for decay, thus a Lucite box, purged with argon.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:For real? by Mursk · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think you are referring to "the stinkeroos." From James Gifford's RAH FAQ:

      The so-called "stinkeroos" (Heinlein's own term for them) are three short stories, all dating from the first phase of his writing career, prior to World War II. With one exception, they have never been reprinted since their original pulp appearances. Heinlein refused reprint requests and never included them in any of his own collections, and his literary executors continue this policy. It is unlikely that any of them will ever be reprinted.

      The stinkeroos are:

      "Beyond Doubt" (Astonishing Stories, Apr 1941)

      "'My Object All Sublime'" (Future, Feb 1942)

      "Pied Piper" (Astonishing, Mar 1942)

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    5. Re:For real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looks like they are in there:

      "Beyond Doubt" (Astonishing Stories, Apr 1941)
      http://www.heinleinarchives.net/upload/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=13

      "'My Object All Sublime'" (Future, Feb 1942)
      http://www.heinleinarchives.net/upload/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=8

      "Pied Piper" (Astonishing, Mar 1942)
      http://www.heinleinarchives.net/upload/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=9

  2. A practice that could save us from rereleases. by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish more writers' archives would just be put online, so we can just simply see what they left out or what work was unfinished at the time of passing without a plethora of new material for purchase. For those of us who loved Stranger in a Strange Land as it was, the release of the uncut version turned something nice into something overlong. And don't get me started on the Dune sequels, where the notes of Frank Herbert, instead of just being shown as they were, were turned into dreck by his son and an airport paperback writer.

    1. Re:A practice that could save us from rereleases. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And don't get me started on the Dune sequels, where the notes of Frank Herbert, instead of just being shown as they were, were turned into dreck by his son and an airport paperback writer."
      Does anyone have any proof that this "notes" actually exist? The prequels are so chock-full of contradictions with the original series and - to put it bluntly - flat-out stupidity that I've always suspected that the notes were either too scanty to form a full work; largely ignored by Herbert & Anderson in favour of their own juvenile ideas; or a complete fiction invented to make a quick buck.
    2. Re:A practice that could save us from rereleases. by shystershep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its hard to think of anybody who has done a good job at "carrying on" a series once the primary author has died.

      I certainly don't disagree with you, but in all fairness there aren't all that many 'primary' authors that have done a good job carrying on a series. The obsession with never-ending series of books in scifi & fantasy almost guarantees that you will lose interest and/or be disappointed by the quality long before the series is finished. A standard trilogy may not be enough, but if there are more than 6 or so books, my advice to the author is to stop trying to milk it, give it a rest, and move on to something fresh.

      There are exceptions to this, but frankly I can't think of any offhand.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:A practice that could save us from rereleases. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are exceptions to this, but frankly I can't think of any offhand.

      I can: Terry Pratchett.

      While the Discworld books have evolved significantly from essentially a ripoff of Douglas Adams to the best fantasy humor ever written to painstaking social commentary and satire, even a spinoff into children's stories that are largely as good as the "main" series, after something close to 30 books, I think he's still doing a great job. Of course, they're not coming out twice a year, each thicker (and better) than the last like they were in the 90's, but I think man is still on a roll.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  3. TANSTAAFL by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As usual.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw a post on rec.art.sf.composition a while back from David Langford talking about his efforts to get his work removed from Scribd.com - in one of the replies another author (James Nicoll? maybe...) said he had difficulty getting other works removed so he contacted the lawyers for Heinlein's estate and within 3 days they'd had every reference to him taken down. Then I saw this and thought, god that's odd that they're putting this all up online for free.... well doh.

    2. Re:TANSTAAFL by grimflick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Electronic commerce! Sigh, I am only an EGG

      --
      'Only a Barbarian believes that his tribes customs are the laws of nature'
    3. Re:TANSTAAFL by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Hilarious!

      I saw your acronym, and (once again, clueless me) I had to look it up in Wikipedia. And it's a Heinlein reference!

      TANSTAAFL is an acronym for the adage "There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch," popularized by science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein in his 1966 novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, which discusses the problems caused by not considering the eventual outcome of an unbalanced economy. This phrase and book are popular with libertarians and economics textbooks. In order to avoid a double negative, the acronym "TINSTAAFL" is sometimes used instead, meaning "There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunch".
      I take it they are charging for access?
    4. Re:TANSTAAFL by Chapter80 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Agreed.

      But if the Estate (or descendants) "invested" in the scanning, and then released the manuscripts a little at a time, via torrents or free / cheap hosting services, it's possible that they would re-energize the market for his books.

      I have never bought a Heinlein book, and don't intend to pay to download stuff. But if I were exposed to it via a free website, it might just pique my interest enough to buy a book (which has happened NUMEROUS times to me with technical books).

      Then again, they might be executing the iPhone "skim the market" strategy. First, you pick up the early adopters at a premium price. Then you open it up for free / cheap, and try to use it to drive other business (like book sales).

    5. Re:TANSTAAFL by AshtangiMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Science fiction as a genre does not at all mean "stuff that can't happen". More often it is a genre that allows examination of the human condition in a new context, so that we can see what absurd animals we are, both individually and especially collectively. SF has in my mind gotten a bad rap in the last 3 decades, and even early on the pulp stuff that claimed to be SF was not. These others fall into more of the Space Western category. While I am a fan of the TV "SciFi" genre, Battlestar Gallactica, Buck Rogers, Space 1999, these are not related to SF of the likes of Heinlein, LeGuin, and others. But I also agree about novels, and more or less about fiction in general. My favorite Heinlein novel is "Job" . . . very funny, and, as I was raised Catholic, very rebelious feeling.

    6. Re:TANSTAAFL by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SciFi to me usually means commentary on religious, political, or just plain social aspects. SciFi has always been a good way for authors to express dissent without having to address the actual subject literally, and avoid trouble with the authorities. Stories about "stuff that can't happen" I would consider in the Fantasy genre. And exercising your mind and imagination is hardly a "passive" activity. It is what will keep your brain from turning into mush as you grow older.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:TANSTAAFL by jtroutman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Here's a list of "Science fiction (stuff that can't happen)"
      • Deep ocean submersibles
      • Satellites
      • Rockets
      • Robots
      • Portable computers
      • Virtual reality
      • Surveillance systems
      • Genetic alteration and modification
      • Holographic cloaking
      • Video Communication

      The fact is, most of the wonders of modern science were predicted in the writings of people like Asimov, Heinlein, Bradbury, Wells, and Clarke.

      --
      I stole this sig from a more creative user.
  4. This links to a *STORE*, people... by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can skip the brief article and go straight to the archives.

    ...Where you can add any of Heinlin's works to your cart, for a low, low price. They take Visa, Mastercard, AmEx, and Discover.

    Hey, if I link to the "complete" works of another great author on Amazon, can I make FP too? Or does it have to belong to some "special" collection selling out?

    1. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one said anything about being free or public domain.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    2. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by derrickh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does it have to be free? If you want to read Stanger in a Strange Land for free, whats stopping you from going to the library? If the $21 price tag on the Starship Troopers opus is too much, then head over to Amazon and get the novel for $5.
      This whole 'everything should be free' movement is weird.

      D

    3. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by badfish99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The whole paying money to a dead author thing is even weirder.

    4. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why does it have to be free?

      By putting a price of even a buck on it you cut out the majority of the world's population.

      If you want to read Stanger in a Strange Land for free, whats stopping you from going to the library? If the $21 price tag on the Starship Troopers opus is too much, then head over to Amazon and get the novel for $5.

      You're being parochial. The US is less than 5% of the world's population. The european population is more than double that but the entire western world is still less than 25%. Not to mention children and other members of western society who can't afford even $5. Why should they go without because of broken IP law?

      This whole 'everything should be free' movement is weird.

      Actually, this whole 'everything should be paid for again and again' movement is the weird one.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    5. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by hercubus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole paying money to a dead author thing is even weirder.


      dead authors may have live heirs who need the money

      it would be nice to think that one's work could benefit one's children for some time

      OTOH, current corporate perversions attempting to lock revenue streams in perpetuity are abominations

      OTTH, Admiral Heinlein, I salute you sir!

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    6. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Insightful

      dead authors may have live heirs who need the money

      Such weak BS.

      If an artist wants to take care of their heirs, they need to do like the rest of us and take care of their heirs with the money they earn while they are still alive.

      Untimely accident? TFB, death sucks for all of us.

      I just don't see what gives artists the right to continue to profit from their works after they die. No one else has that "right".

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    7. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      dead authors may have live heirs who need the money
      My grandfather is dead, but I am his heir. He did some good work 70 years ago but I am quite poor. Everyone must send me $10.

      it would be nice to think that one's work could benefit one's children for some time
      I would like that too. But my employer has told me that my pay will be stopped when I die. Evidently I am in the wrong industry.

    8. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by hercubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      my employer has told me that my pay will be stopped when I die. Evidently I am in the wrong industry


      okay, so what industry are you in? should your heirs be paid for your enduring work at the Walmart checkout? at the Ford assembly plant? well, probably not. at Microsoft? hmm, maybe not. in your studio creating a new genre of painting / literature / music? yep, that's how we've been doing it for a while

      what if you author an enduring work that continues to benefit society and parenthetically continues to sell. you are going to insist you stop being paid after some time limit? and what is that limit? two years? at your death? say you die the day after your first sale. so then is your wife screwed, your children screwed?

      not like we're talking about 20 lines of Java code tossed off just after lunch, we're talking about a large personal effort creating an enduring work of art

      you take a year off, create a work at the same level as Stranger In A Strange Land, then give it to me. for free. thanks! and when SciFi creates the mini series, tell them to take their filthy money and piss off, you don't want it. good for you! God forbid you spend your advance on a round the world trip (i assume you'd take an advance from a publisher, if not a cut of the sales) and then you snuff it on a beach in Thailand (sorry, killed you off in a tsunami). your year old child who was too young for the trip is screwed. thanks papa!

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    9. Re:This links to a *STORE*, people... by hercubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Such weak BS. If an artist wants to take care of their heirs, they need to do like the rest of us and take care of their heirs with the money they earn while they are still alive. Untimely accident? TFB, death sucks for all of us. I just don't see what gives artists the right to continue to profit from their works after they die. No one else has that "right".


      you can't see it because you're myopic. consult an optometrist

      also, consider the life gamble someone like Heinlein makes. part of why he concludes he can make that gamble is the payoff, for him and his heirs, has high potential. you're talking about restricting and/or eliminating that potential

      i know i like to keep my artists down. keeps 'em from getting uppity and acting like they deserve something for their effort

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
  5. No Free Lunch by norm1153 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, how depressing. Somehow from the news releases I also thought it'd be a freebie. After all, it's a publicly funded institution...

    Grumble, mumble mumble.

    Shoulda known.

  6. Copyright concerns by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To avoid another Scribd-like fiasco, do they have permission from Heilien's estate to do this?

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  7. Increase the income... by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Though the Archives is provided online for research and academic purposes, The Heinlein Prize Trust, Robert and Virginia Heinlein's estate, who made the online Archives possible is not a non-profit organization. Just as Heinlein always said he wrote for money (something you'll find is true if you read through his correspondence), the Trustees have a responsibility to not only maintain, but increase the income of the Heinleins' estate. This benefits us all as the mission of the Heinlein Prize Trust is to not only preserve Heinlein's legacy through projects such as this online Archives, but to support and encourage the human (that's us) expansion into space through commercial endeavors. The first Heinlein Prize of $500,000 was awarded to Peter Diamandis for just such commercial space endeavors.

    1. Re:Increase the income... by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... This benefits us all...

      No, this benefits only those who accidentally happen to have objectives similar to those of the trust.

      ---

      Like software, intellectual property law is a product of the mind, and can be anything we want it to be. Let's get it right.

  8. I'm a fanboy but... by The+Mutant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I fear this is for the hard core only.

    I was hoping to get downloadable versions of all his books that I read as a kid, especially some of the more obscure titles, and as I read them.

    Don't get me wrong - this is very cool, but we're not talking the finished product here, but all drafts leading up to the galley that was submitted to the publisher.

    So this would be very good to see how the plot, characters & books were developed. But you're not gonna curl up with one of these. I suspect they'll be dense reads.

    And expensive! The complete, seven parts of Starship Troopers will set you back $21!!

  9. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow, are you kidding me?

    Heinlein is one of the biggest, most influential names in science fiction. He won 4 Hugos, the very first Grand Master Award from the SFWA, and I'm sure a lot more awards that I don't know about. Fuck, at one time he was referred to as one of the "Big Three" names in sci fi (along with Asimov and Clarke).

    Read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Friday, Stranger in a Strange Land, and Citizen of the Galaxy. If you can't appreciate the genius that this man had after that, you're beyond hope.

  10. hrmph. by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like Heinlein.

    I have all his books, even the one finished by Spider Robinson.

    But when I can buy an copy off the 'net for less then a scanned, no doubt DRM'd, electronic copy - I have to wonder who the target of this website is.

    Bottom line - If you want to impress people donate the collected works to the Gutenberg archive.

    But of course that is not a money spinner. Hardcore fans only indeed - though I am not knocking this as a source for historical research for the academics.

    1. Re:hrmph. by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your last line answered it: Hardcore fans and academics.

      While I love to read, I have very little interest in HOW a book is written. I mean, I kind of care, but not enough to sift through tons of notes and try to recreate his thought process on a book that took him months or years to write. I simply don't have enough time to care.

      On the other hand, if I were looking at writing my first book, I'd be sorely tempted to take a look at the process a master used, and see what could help me along.

      And if I lived and breathed his books, I'd cherish the ability to get deeper into his thinking.

      I just like a good story, though, not the author or anything else involved.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  11. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Critical opinion has greatly turned against Heinlein after his death. Many writers have won awards only to be recognized as over-hyped later.

  12. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by LukeWebber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Heinlein was not exactly a literary genius, but he wrote a good yarn, and that's more than some geniuses could manage. More of a Rudyard Kipling than a James Joyce. But I know which I'd rather read.

    It's a tragic shame that Heinlein lived long enough to write his later rubbish, which he apparently typed one-handed, with his trousers off. But his early stuff made good light reading. Fun and full of ideas.

  13. Playboy.com makes mens magazine available online! by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, Playboy Magazine recently launched Playboy.com, which allows the worlds premier men's magazine to be made available online! You can skip the brief article, and go straight to the archives [NSFW].

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  14. Vector: Santa Cruz by drseuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    The last entry in the archive seems to indicate that he was preparing a new book: "Once upon a time a very large meteorite was heading directly for SCO. It was like a million miles across and filling the sky. Even then Darl didn't notice as he was too bust trying to kick the company server back to life ..." It ends there but there's a footnote: "This will undoubtably destory my Santa Cruz Library archive too but it's a price worth paying". It's amazing how he could predict the future with such accuracy. Then, mysteriously he died. RIP RH.

  15. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heinlein was one of a handful of writers that created the genre of Adult Science Fiction. You can see the transition in his own works, like from the Juvenile literature of Starship Troopers to the Adult Stranger in a Strange Land. If it weren't for Heinlein, Asimov, Bradbury, et al, Sci Fi might still be "pulp" fiction and "boys books". BTW, I'm using "juvenile" in the library sense, not pejorative.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  16. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Funny

    More of a Rudyard Kipling than a James Joyce. But I know which I'd rather read.

    Yes, yes, YES!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  17. It's a shame he renewed everything. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heinlein (and his successors) were extraordinarily diligent about renewing every single thing he ever wrote. If they hadn't been, you could read some examples that had fallen through the cracks and into the public domain, such as the works of: Poul Anderson, Marion Zimmer Bradley, John W. Campbell, Lester Del Rey, Harry Harrison, Damon Knight, Andre Norton, H. Beam Piper, Frederik Pohl, E. E. "Doc" Smith and Kurt Vonnegut.

    Actually, it appears there may be one or two available shorts, the ones that he really, really hated and prevented from ever being republished. I may hit up my interlibrary loan department for that.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  18. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by wytcld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Heinlein was not exactly a literary genius ... more of a Rudyard Kipling
    I love Joyce, but Kipling was the better writer, and thoroughly recognized in his time for it. Among Kipling's closest friends were Henry and William James. What Henry James did for expat Americans, Kipling did for expat Brits. Oh, you'll find far more English professors today who hold out Henry as the great genius, and Rudyard as pedestrian - but that's a temporary fashion, having nothing to do with their writing abilities, mostly a reflection of the fact that an American going to London to seek her or his fortune is currently respectable, while an English person's presence in India for the same purpose is not, just at present, seen as politically correct.

    Heinlein knew he was writing in the style of Kipling - and Twain - the two best writers in the English language since Shakespeare and Milton. Heinlein knew their work intimately. Since Heinlein was describing outward-looking people and societies, people of the frontiers such as Kipling and Twain had written of, they were perfect models for him. Joyce, by contrast, is an example of European culture turned inward, during a period of great failures and retreat. And that's the problem with most of what passes for "literature" today - it deals in neurosis and failure rather than hope and success. Our scope should be wide enough to encompass both. And of the latter, Heinlein was the greatest author of the 20th Century. His sentences are deliciously-well crafted, too. His care in the details was as fine as Joyce's. It's just a different style. But he was perfect at it, especially in his first couple of decades.
    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  19. Re:smokin something by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think the title originally was "I Will Fear No Editor" (okay, I joke) but it read like that, too. Not one of his greatest works. However his artery blockage problem was kicking in around then.

    I'll stick my two cents in here. Heinlein's juveniles and many other works (up until the period when the transition in quality coming from his cerebral artery problem deeply hurt his work) all celebrated the human condition, and the ability of man to rise to noble heights. They also were cracking good stories, too. Heinlein does not deserve the denigration coming these days from academic hacks and people unable to understand what he was really getting at. He wrote of man's responsibility to society, over and over again, and I find it offensive when some dimwitted, unimaginative 'publish or perish' academic arrogantly demeans him.

    In his time - a span of decades overlapping WWII - Heinlein was a giant and an inspiration to many engineers and scientists; any current critic dismissing him as a totalitarian Nazi is getting it completely wrong. His goal was to make money entertaining, true, but he aimed to inspire, he aimed at noble mores. He was not a literary cheat or a fraud and tried to give good value for the money. He was human and he made some mistakes in later years. But overall he saluted the best in man, championed the competent man in his stories. He was in favor of can-do, and held whiny slackers in disdain. If someone finds fault in that, the problem is with them, not him. His Starship Troopers was about genuine duty to man, unlike many of today's shallow military porn 'Sci-Fi" novels. (The movie adaptation was not his fault.) His Door Into Summer inspired me as a budding engineer. Today's lightweight bookstore rack-space fillers, by contrast, are shallow and disposable. I don't see many of them lighting the right sparks in growing minds like Heinlein did.

  20. Re:Who Robert Heinlein is... by arodland · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please turn in your /. account on the way out the door. Thank you.

  21. Re:Umm??? I thought Heinlein... by raddan · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the ultimate in neurosis and failure try Dostoyevski and Kafka. Holy shit. After that, I'll read anything. Supermarket porn. Crichton. Just make me happy again.

  22. Re:Who Robert Heinlein is... by Daath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allow me to be the first to welcome you to slashdot, we hope you enjoy your stay! ;)

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  23. Re:For real? - Copyright by davidgreystahl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I too was very disappointed to arrive at the archives and notice that payment was required. Did not follow through with the process to see what "rights" I was purchasing.

    A friend of mine, now deceased, Amy Mahin was the copyright lawyer for Lassie. She was a wonderful person, thoughtful, and for the last ten years I've wondered often what her take on the copyright mess we are in would be. As many others have commented in the past - the current legal structure supports the distributors - with each individual artist often being required to audit the distributors to recoup their payments. The system also has made it almost impossible for any works to come into the public domain.

    As a photographer I want to support the artists and creators of work, but the current system does not do that. To defend a copyright I must locate anyone who is using my work and sue them. That is an expensive process, most artists cannot do, including myself. If I don't defend my copyright, I have nothing, there is no "copyright" police or enforcement.

    So thank goodness the Archives were scanned. Too bad that the works are not search friendly and in the public domain were they could inspire a new generation of forward thinking authors. Very sad will be the day if the archives are not profitable and the digital format the files are in are no longer supported [say 30+ years from now].