Slashdot Mirror


STriDER, a Three-Legged Walking Robot

Roland Piquepaille writes "In a short article, New Scientist reports that researchers at Virginia Tech University have developed a tripedal experimental robot. With its three legs, this robot, named STriDER — short for 'Self-excited Tripedal Dynamic Experimental Robot' — is actually more stable than 2- or 4-legged robots. As said another researcher, 'It's like a biped with a walking stick.' This robot is intended to deploy sensors and cameras in difficult-to-access areas."

105 comments

  1. More human than humans by 12357bd · · Score: 1

    Great, now robots will have also three legs.

    --
    What's in a sig?
    1. Re:More human than humans by TheeBlueRoom · · Score: 1

      A White Zombie song? Reminds me of something that would be in Aeon Flux...

      --
      I wish I was clever!
    2. Re:More human than humans by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not an expert on this - but I'm sure there is a good reason why 3 legged things aren't popular in nature.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    3. Re:More human than humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just when Minime thought he was something special...

    4. Re:More human than humans by Falkkin · · Score: 2

      The lack of 3-legged things is an "unintended" side effect of the fact that bilateral symmetry is practically ubiquitous in animals (excepting sponges and cnidarians), and any animal with bilateral symmetry is going to end up with an even number of legs. Bilateral symmetry has many evolutionary "uses" aside from locomotion, so it's fair to presume that an odd number of legs *could* still result in efficient locomotion.

      Things with wheels aren't popular in nature either, but that doesn't mean wheels aren't effective for locomotion.

    5. Re:More human than humans by Wite_Noiz · · Score: 1

      Things with wheels aren't popular in nature


      But I say that they have to just put up with 'em. Uncivilised buggers.
    6. Re:More human than humans by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Things with wheels aren't popular in nature either, but that doesn't mean wheels aren't effective for locomotion."

      Actually if you consider the varied amount of terrain, wheels are impractical, they just don't have the wealth of terrain adaptability that feet and appendages provide.. like camels or amphibians.

      How many wheels can climb trees?

    7. Re:More human than humans by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but half the time I have 3 legs.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  2. Imagine a googleplex of tripod robots by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Now that would be a sight!

    But seriously, flipping 180 degrees with each step? That reduces the useful applications ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Imagine a googleplex of tripod robots by User+956 · · Score: 1

      But seriously, flipping 180 degrees with each step? That reduces the useful applications

      Not if the application you have in mind involves BEING COMPLETELY AWESOME, it doesn't.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Imagine a googleplex of tripod robots by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but wouldn't it be more awesome if the tripod robots used three-legged canes to help them walk?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  3. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Self excited"?

    1. Re:Umm... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      This is /. remember.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    2. Re:Umm... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "Self excited"?
      Yes, that's why it's three-legged, not two-legged with a nubbin.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  4. old news by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

    I have a tape (yes, cassette tapes - remember those?) of a BBC Radio 4 science doc from 18 months or so ago which I taped for the bit where they interviewed Jim Bell & some other MER people, and also looked round the JPL robotics lab; they mentioned this one, and also something called ATHLETE (google it up) and another gizmo described as looking like a robotic spider with multiple articulated arms, intended for EVA work around the ISS or similar structures, whose name I forget. They were just proof-of-concept work at that stage of course, not funded or anything.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    1. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...I have chocolate chip and penut butter. Which cookie do you want exactly?

  5. Oh, come on! by u-bend · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Self-excited?" Tripod? And we're not supposed to make naughty jokes about this?

    --
    u-bend
    1. Re:Oh, come on! by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      'It's like a biped with a walking stick.'

      That's what she said.

    2. Re:Oh, come on! by thsths · · Score: 1

      > 'It's like a biped with a walking stick.'

      Or a crutch?

    3. Re:Oh, come on! by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      It's a social experiment, you see.


      PS. Watch out or you might get a camera in a hard to reach place..

      --
      Store with salt
  6. Interesting concept, but... by thesolo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting concept, except that with the way it moves, it can't really walk in a straight line.

    Because it swings one leg outward from the rear to the front, it's always going to essentially be side-stepping a width that's in direct proportion to the length of its legs. If it starts in a position like <|, with two legs up front and one in the rear, and then swings the rear leg outward to position |>, the next step has to be to the left or right sides. It could every other stuff in reverse and zig-zag for the net effect of a straight line, but it wouldn't work well for very narrow spaces unless it could dynamically adjust the height of its legs.

    Nevertheless, I'd love to see one run at some point!

    1. Re:Interesting concept, but... by thesolo · · Score: 1

      That should read, "It could take every other step", not "It could every other stuff". Whoops. :)

    2. Re:Interesting concept, but... by falconx7 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's like flipping an equilateral triangle, it actually only needs the height of the triangle as a width to follow a path. the path it follows, as far as the legs are concerned, is straight. The central body does move in a zig-zag method, but that doesn't matter for navigating tight spaces.

      Basically, the directions it travels in are in line with one of it's sides, not in line with the direction one corner is pointing as you were trying to illustrate. Their videos on the article page rather nicely visualized it moving i a straight line.

      The main problem I see is that it can't do any turn by a a 60 degree turn. It can travel in 6 directions only... Makes me feel like I'm playing a hex board game...

    3. Re:Interesting concept, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it can't really walk in a straight line

      Not all those who wander are lost.

    4. Re:Interesting concept, but... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Interesting concept, except that with the way it moves, it can't really walk in a straight line.

      When I looked at the video, I thought, "WOW! Thats pretty cool how the body flips like that".

      Then, it came to me, that it sucks that the body flips like that. What kind of payload could you have on the thing when every step it took it was flipped upside down?

      Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a value added here.

    5. Re:Interesting concept, but... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      The main problem I see is that it can't do any turn by a a 60 degree turn. It can travel in 6 directions only... Makes me feel like I'm playing a hex board game...

      Meaning you are prepared for leading the legions of strider-based war machines that are soon to be developed. Bet you never thought hex-based strategy gaming would be relevant to real life, but now you could be a General!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Interesting concept, but... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Strangely appropriate given all the talk of tripods, that your quip should bring to mind 'deep roots'. ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    7. Re:Interesting concept, but... by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      screw a flying car, I want 1" miniatures that sit on top of these legs. Oh, and a map where they can move straight.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    8. Re:Interesting concept, but... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Years of studying the Tao of Chinese Checkers have finally paid off!

    9. Re:Interesting concept, but... by comradeeroid · · Score: 1

      Camera doesn't really care if it's upside down or downside up. Just flip the image in the viewscreen 180 degrees. Granted, it'll be a bit of bother when the viewpoint shifts some 20 odd centimeters up and down every now and then and the legs might be in the way of panorama. But I can see ways to adjust for that. (one camera per side of the triangle, mounted inside the body and you're done. Three legged recon unit.)

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    10. Re:Interesting concept, but... by inline_four · · Score: 1

      Already done.

      --
      Alexey
  7. 25 years too late by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some guy in our neighborhood had one of these. I never saw it. But every time it snowed, tracks made by the 3 legged robot would begin showing up. What was really clever was how he molded animal paws on the feet to improve traction.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  8. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does it do under gun fire?

  9. Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our new tripod overlords. My only question, are they HG Wells-style or John Christopher-style?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Three legged self-excited robot? Sounds like R2D2!

      --
      The game.
    2. Re:Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be John Christopher. His tipods moved by spinning. HG Wells tripods did not.

    3. Re:Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by Intron · · Score: 1

      ITYM Samuel Youd.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    4. Re:Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by geekd · · Score: 1

      I loved those John Christopher books when I was a kid.

      That was the first thing I thought about when I saw this story.

      Thanks for the wiki link. I had no idea there was a TV show and a comic book.

      -geekd

    5. Re:Allow me to be the first to welcome..... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I'm counting on the ones from Half-Life 2 (which, conveniently enough, are already named Striders), but I doubt there can be too much difference between evil killer tripods so it doesn't really matter.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  10. ummm, Combine anyone by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe no-one made a joke about Half-Life 2 and the Combine's Striders.

    I wonder if Gordon is in on this project?

    1. Re:ummm, Combine anyone by CookieOfFortune · · Score: 1

      yeah, that's what I was thinking! 3 legged Robot, Strider? Com'n people!

    2. Re:ummm, Combine anyone by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just that the article a has already taken all the fun out of it by referring to it in it's video.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    3. Re:ummm, Combine anyone by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason for me to find a way to convince the company to unblock Youtube videos.

    4. Re:ummm, Combine anyone by rpillala · · Score: 1

      Computer games? Tchah! In my day, all we had was Aragorn.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  11. Power source? by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    I'm curious what kind of practical applications this would have. As another poster mentioned, the robot flips every time it takes a step. This would probably make it difficult to have the power source in the central module connecting the legs as it would be too heavy (unless it was perfectly balanced, which might be a bigger issue).

  12. Ulla! Ulla! by The+Queen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    JOURNALIST: Quickly, one after the other, four of the Fighting Machines appeared. Monstrous tripods, higher than the tallest steeple, striding over the pine trees and smashing them. Walking engines of glittering metal. Each carried a huge funnel and I realized with horror that I'd seen this awful thing before.

    A fifth Machine appeared on the far bank. It raised itself to full height, flourished the funnel high in the air - and the ghostly, terrible Heat Ray struck the town.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    1. Re:Ulla! Ulla! by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Exactly my thoughts.
      Now I can't get the Moody Blues tune out of my head!

  13. Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So where are the frickin lasers?

    No lasers, no cool.

  14. Oh buzz off !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    its Strider from Lord of the Rings lore, nickname of aragorn in around bree land and you know it.

    bastardly geeks geekizing all aspects of our culture....







    eheehehehe

  15. ATTN SLASHDOT ADMIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why can i only post twice a day and then it tells me to wait 24 hrs

    i didnt do anythin wron.g....

    1. Re:ATTN SLASHDOT ADMIN by triso · · Score: 1

      why can i only post twice a day and then it tells me to wait 24 hrs ... Are you registered? Do you meta-moderate regularly?
  16. Brilliant! by spotlight2k3 · · Score: 0

    So they created a male robot.

  17. 'It's like a biped with a walking stick.'
    4chan is already interested in images, please submit asap.

    --
    Sure baby, I'll give you my phone number...in Hex
  18. Glock'n spiel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How well can it handle a Glock?

  19. Larry Niven, anyone. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    It's a mechanical Pierson's Puppeteer, that's all.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Larry Niven, anyone. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      It's a mechanical Pierson's Puppeteer, that's all

      Actually I was thinking about the story where the Ramans do everything in threes.

    2. Re:Larry Niven, anyone. by mdenham · · Score: 1

      Actually I was thinking about the story where the Ramans do everything in threes. Yeah, if it's shaped like a ball with three legs and three "whips", it's a perfect imitation of the "spiders" from the Rama series.
    3. Re:Larry Niven, anyone. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Actually I was thinking about the story where the Ramans do everything in threes. Did anyone else read this and think "three packets of ramen, yummy!" :P
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  20. Stride... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Rite...

    If it wears shoes???

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  21. roland again? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You hot-shot computer geeks at /. ought to b able create a new story filter - that permits any story with the string of random letters "Roland Piquepaille" to be filtered out. As a public service, of course. Clearly the Ed's aren't up to the task.

            Brett

    1. Re:roland again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? He's stopped linking his miserable blog and started linking the real story, which was the beef Slashdot had with him.

    2. Re:roland again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending weekly links from newscientist.com is quite a career afterall. I'd suggest Roland at least try to use the proper name of the University to which he has referred in his brief and non-technical summary.

    3. Re:roland again? by Inda · · Score: 1

      This is the second time I've mentioned this - I wish I could remember the correct answer...

      There is a greasemonkey or Firefox extension to filter Roland's stories.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  22. What an amazing discovery! by Warbringer87 · · Score: 1

    3 is more stable than 2 or four? Look, there is a point. It's lonely. Two points make a line. Three points make a plane. A fourth point would be restricted as to where it can be placed to stay on the level plane, and bad placement would...."break" your flat plane. Three points always make a flat plane. Four points are not so consistent.

    1. Re:What an amazing discovery! by bronney · · Score: 1

      Your style is most intriguing, reminds me of Time Cube.

    2. Re:What an amazing discovery! by Warbringer87 · · Score: 1

      Never heard of Time Cube till now.

    3. Re:What an amazing discovery! by bronney · · Score: 1

      :) Yeah just the short statements you made reminds me of it heh. Your "points" are completely valid though.

    4. Re:What an amazing discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four points are not so consistent.
      That was a weird little analysis -- as the others point out, very Time Cube-y in that it reasons entirely with geometry, without needing any of that messy real-world stuff, like physics. But the planarity ("consistency?") of the points of contact has little to do with how stable the creature is. If the points of contact had to be planar for the creature to remain stable, millipedes -- which have hundreds of points of contact -- would never be able to stand. Likewise, a human may have trouble maintaining their balance on one leg, but a foot-shaped rock, which arguably has the same "non-planar" point of contact, has no problem remaining stable, even in gale-force winds.

      A creature is stable if its center of gravity lies within the convex hull of its points of contact, as projected to a "flat" ground plane (i.e. normal to the gravity vector). Since it is easier to maintain your center of gravity within a quadrilateral than a triangle (since a quadrilateral usually has more area than a triangle for creatures of roughly the same horizontal diameter), four-legged creatures are inherently more stable than three-legged creatures.

      Since the article doesn't elaborate on the summary's claim that the three-legged robot is more stable than four-legged robots, I can only assume that they meant it is more stable than certain four-legged robots, not four-legged creatures in general.
  23. Men and Women by jrmcc · · Score: 1

    Notice in the video where the guy watches with his hands on his hips whereas the girl instinctively reaches out as the device teeters forward? Will we have a whole generation of roboMoms?

  24. 'It's like a biped with a walking stick.' by whopub · · Score: 2, Funny

    'It's like a biped with a long dick.'

    Fixed.

    1. Re:'It's like a biped with a walking stick.' by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      which would be awesome for walking across fluffy pillows.. but glass and rocks.. not so much.

  25. Get your mind out of the gutter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides, everyone knows that sex-crazed robots use tentacles instead of a "third leg" to satisfy their cravings.

    GMD

  26. Hell of a comparison by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny

    'It's like a biped with a walking stick.'

    Hm, I'd say it's more like a nine-legged dog that's had six legs removed.

    Seriously, does he think it's that difficult for people to conceive of something with three legs? :)
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Hell of a comparison by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a pretty crummy analogy anyways. A biped with a walking stick has two primary limbs and shifts its weight to leverage the third assistant limb. All limbs are equivalent in the video, plus the mechanics look inefficient as hell. Swinging the entire body and one limb to take a step? And, a step that's angled away from your intended direction? Bah.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Hell of a comparison by slashbaby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it looks a pretty efficient way of using gravity to move. It's not much different than how you learned to walk, except that the robot keeps two legs stable instead of your one. In fact, the talking video chick says "this novel tripedal gate is highly energy efficient."

  27. R2D2 responds by alienmole · · Score: 3, Funny

    R2D2 denies being self-excited, and says he only keeps replaying that hologram of Leia for sentimental reasons.

  28. Follow The Freeman !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch-out! Striders!!!!!!

    (So who's goinna develop the headhum....err....headcrabs?)

  29. That would be "Virginia Tech" ! by sraasch · · Score: 1

    The school should *NEVER* be referred to as "Virginia Tech University"... ARGH!!! Yuck!!!

    --> BSEE, VPI&SU 1987

  30. Virginia Tech by hokiejimbo · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as Virginia Tech University... it's Virginia Tech or Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  31. You know by Zorbane · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article can never take your fun if you just refuse to read it. I mean come on...who needs to know what they are commenting about around here?

  32. Correction... by gnownaym · · Score: 3, Informative

    The full name of the school is "Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University." "Virginia Tech" is an official trademark. "Virginia Tech University" draws angry, red-pen-toting alums.

    Just thought I'd let you know...

  33. My 3rd Leg and it's new use by JamJam · · Score: 1

    I've got a 3rd leg but it never occurred to me to use it for walking, oh wait....

    1. Re:My 3rd Leg and it's new use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to do a backflip and land on my cock.

      Now I have a sore head.

      I believe the two are related, but I can't remember anything else.

  34. Orwells gonna be pissed by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

    Did they really just say "Two legs good, three legs better"?

    Not again...

    I for one welcome our new three legged robotic overlords.

    --
    Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
  35. More Stable? Doubtful. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    I doubt this could honestly be called "more stable" than 2- or 4-legged robots, because during most of its stride, it is hanging off-center-of-gravity by two legs. This might be said to be more "stable" than most 2-legged strides, but 4-legged? I doubt it very much.

    Further, each step averages 30 degrees away from the desired direction of travel, so it is a very inefficient walk, as well.

    1. Re:More Stable? Doubtful. by SkyFalling · · Score: 1

      Well, the stability of tripods is pretty well-established. Of course, you'd want to consider stability while stationary and while in motion. There's also a weight ratio to consider -- whatever metric of stability you choose, I bet you can maximize stability-to-weight with three legs rather than any other number.

      As another poster pointed out, the stability of three legs has a lot to do with the fact that any three (non-colinear) points describe a plane. With four legs, you'd have to engineer against the tendency of the fourth leg to disrupt the plane and set the whole thing rocking on a linear axis between two diagonal legs.

      Stability in motion is a much more complex matter. Think of all the things that can go wrong in the course of walking. The ground can give way underneath you, or move vertically, or move laterally. You can get stuck in the mud. You can trip over stuff. Your feet can slip or bounce (as the prototype in the video seems to have some issues with -- too bad they don't show more of it). And on and on. There's too many possible variations to declare "four legs good, three legs baaaaad" (or the converse) in general. You'd have to select a particular subset of important criteria -- do you want to walk on rubble? Mars? Sand? Mud? Ice? Dodge flying obstacles?

    2. Re:More Stable? Doubtful. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Static stability is not an issue here at all, since any well-designed bipod with feet, tripod, or quadripod will be reasonably stable at rest. We can just dispense with all of that. The only issue in question here is dynamic stability. Anything else is non-sequitur.

      The dynamic stability of tripedal motion has NOT been "well established". If it had, this would not be news. At all.

      When it comes to dynamic stability, that very point about 3 points making a plane (which should be considered kindergarten material in this context), does become relevant. The triped (not "tripod") shown here swings its mass in one direction, then catches itself in an approximately stable position to complete the stride. During most of this stride, it is dangling from two points (not three) in a manner that is very definitely off-center-of-mass. During that period, it is UNSTABLE, in the same sense that a biped is unstable in the midst of its stride, swinging or having swung its mass forward without having caught itself yet at the end of the stride.

      As a student of martial arts, I can testify to the instability of human stride for most of its duration. The triped in this clip shares the same vulnerability. While that vulnerability is somewhat more limited in direction, this is literally a slight matter of degree(s), not a qualitative difference.

      A quadruped simply does not have this instability... or at least, does not need to. A carefully-moving quadruped can have a stable tripod stance even while shifting its weight, eliminating most or even all of the dynamic instability that is inherent in the stride of those with fewer legs.

      Rough terrain has little real bearing on the issue. Certainly there is rough terrain everywhere, but if Earth life is a good example, then the general principle is quite simply that things with a larger number of coordinated legs stumble less frequently over obstacles. This principle is quite consistent, as one can learn from any small child who has had opportunity to play outside for a few years. And we have no reason -- absolutely no shred of reason whatever -- to suppose that it would be any different on Mars.

      Having stated that, it is true that a creature or machine on Mars might get away with fewer legs than on Earth, simply because there is more time to recover from a stumble. But that still does not change the basic principle.

      The conclusion is as I have already stated: in some respects this 3-legged gait might be considered marginally more stable than a biped gait, but it simply does not approach the stability of a careful quadruped. And please do not try to argue that this is not an example of a "careful" gait, because very obviously it is as careful as they have been able to make it.

  36. A head on each side, with eyes every direction? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    And it's worth pointing out that it turns itself upside down every time it takes a step. This would, I think, end up being a real bear of a problem in a practical robot... sometimes the head's on the top... sometimes the head's on the bottom. It also has each of the three sides being the "front" alternately-- so, essentially, it has no front... Still, it's pretty darn cool.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:A head on each side, with eyes every direction? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      > And it's worth pointing out that it turns itself upside down every time it takes a step. This would, I think,
      > end up being a real bear of a problem in a practical robot... sometimes the head's on the top... sometimes the
      > head's on the bottom. It also has each of the three sides being the "front" alternately-- so, essentially, it
      > has no front... Still, it's pretty darn cool.

      So just put a chaingun on all 3 surfaces and make sure the ammunition feed can handle being inverted. What's the problem?

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  37. Acronym by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    I like this one better:

    Anthromorphized
    Roving
    Asymmetrically
    Gaited
    Off-balance
    Robotic
    Novelty

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  38. you want stable? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    BigDog by Boston Dynamics is already there.
    For those who haven't seen it, watch the video. The part where they try to kick it over is pretty impressive.

  39. The Navy? by wfs2mail.com · · Score: 1

    Interesting robot. However, why is this sponsored by the Navy? I could see if it had three fins, but it looks like its a landlubbing robot?

  40. gotta love the reporter's math skills... by deander2 · · Score: 1

    The first prototype stands 1.8 metres tall, while the latest incarnation is slightly shorter, at 0.9 metres.

    yeah...."slightly" shorter....

  41. IANARS by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

    IANARS (I am not a robot scientist), but given that the body has to rotate 180 degrees with each step, I find it difficult to figure out how it can carry any significant load. It's really cool looking, but I believe that would affect its utility. Big time.

  42. Worthless Video by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    That was the most worthless video possible. First, they waste almost half of it explaining all kinds of irrelevant things. "The robot doesn't walk like Hollywood!" Why not just show the robot walking, so we can see for ourselves? Then a whole bunch of step-by-step still imagery showing how a computer model of the robot would appear in different stages of walking. Then, finally, some footage of the computer model walking. Then a bunch of half-assed brochureware footage of the computer model in paramilitary applications. Then, a brief clip of the actual physical prototype FAILING to walk and being caught before it falls over. At the very end, the narrator indicates that NOW we're going to see footage of the physical prototype walking, except that the clip ends right at that point.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  43. Wait... by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

    Where the hell is Gordon Freeman?

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  44. Personnaly ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... I welcome our Martian overlords.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  45. Half-Life 2 by Machtyn · · Score: 1

    First thing I thought of when I saw Strider and tripod in the headline.

  46. ... And Jim Henson wants ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... his puppets from The Dark Crystal back.

  47. Am I the only one... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    Who, instead of thinking about Half-Life 2, thought of The Tripods?

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  48. 4 legs by iain010100 · · Score: 1

    This can be done with 4 legs, 2 front legs for stability while the body flips 180 degrees and 2 back legs flip under. This means straight lines, right angles, and more stability.

  49. Interesting by British · · Score: 1

    I thought it was an interesting concept, except for the fact the body flips over. That means you can't put a torso above said tripod.

    For years we've seen movies & video games show three-legged robots & critters walk around, but you've never seen the mechanics of it. The technical side of me was always curious how it could be done. If you have a standing tripod, the instant it raises a leg, you have an angled(ie not straight like a bipoed) footing for the remaining 2 legs. Add the offset center of gravity(of the body), and it's gonna tip! That moving leg better quickly move forward and plant the foot down. The other 2 legs will repeat the process in some logical order.

    The robot in the article kind of chepens it with the center & rear leg doing a swing around. I think with some more research, a more proper way to walk would work that doesn't make the tripod top such an unusuable platform.

  50. no use by doti · · Score: 1

    With the body rotating like that on each step, it's no use for bringing me beer.

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
  51. Where to add arms/head to this "robot" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this robot could be good for flipping burgers inside it's "body" as it walks, but that is pretty much it, as it will be a great chalenge to add something usefull like arms/eyes to it's flipping-as-it-walks-body.

    This "robot" design is Worthless.