Slashdot Mirror


Space Rope Trick Experiment Goes Awry

Tjeerd writes "An experiment that envisaged sending a parcel from space to Earth on a 30-kilometre tether fell short of its goal yesterday when the long fibre rope did not fully unwind, Russian Mission Control said. It was intended to deliver a spherical capsule, called Fotino, attached to the end of the tether back to Earth — a relatively simple and cheap technology that could be used in the future to retrieve bulkier cargoes from space.""

48 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Actually... by The_Isle_of_Mark · · Score: 5, Funny

    I climbed up the rope and hid in my secret magic room until I felt rested. Then, I climbed down and did 10d4 damage to Fotino.

    1. Re:Actually... by lexarius · · Score: 4, Informative

      But where did you put your magic bag while you were in there? It's dangerous to bring those inside, you know.

  2. after a thourough scientific analysis ... by Kristoph · · Score: 4, Funny

    The reason for the problem wasn't immediately clear. "It could be that the tether got stuck," Lyndin said.

    1. Re:after a thourough scientific analysis ... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it was "ah, I see provlum, wodca lid stuck in gear," and then some kind of wise crack about moose and squirrel.

      --
      We are the Borg...
  3. it's funny because it's true by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    An experiment that envisaged sending a parcel from space to Earth on a 30-kilometre tether fell short of its goal yesterday when the long fibre rope did not fully unwind

    So that's how UPS plans on routing packages in the future. Perhaps they realize that the only way to achieve more damage per parcel is to actually drop them from outer space.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:it's funny because it's true by Psychor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think even dropping from outer space plus the burns from reentry would still damage a package less than the average UPS delivery. They set a pretty high bar, I'm not sure that mere science is enough to top it.

    2. Re:it's funny because it's true by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of UPS, what happened to the idea that express parcel companies would be major forces behind private space exploration? In Michael Flynn's novel Firestar FedEx is one of the first companies to buy private spacecraft because it sees major profits in being able to deliver anywhere on Earth in just a couple of hours. But when you read about private space ventures here on Slashdot, parcel companies don't play any sort of role.

    3. Re:it's funny because it's true by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's how UPS plans on routing packages in the future.

      INCOMING!!!

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    4. Re:it's funny because it's true by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A vanishingly small number of situations require a specific material object to cross the globe in a couple hours. The Internet relieves any information hauling needs, and the rise of manufacturing and general ubiquity of export goods has meant that there's probably an identical copy of that object that can be had more locally. So most remaining situations would be fully burdened (not amortized like all 2,000 packages in a neighborhood UPS truck). Now it takes a LOT of energy to get even the smallest object into orbit, ...

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    5. Re:it's funny because it's true by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A couple of reasons I can think of:

      1.) Cost. Sure, you could get a package delivered to Russia in less than an hour, but it would cost 3 million dollars.

      2.) Right now, the vehicles we have that are designed for quick takeoff, orbit, and re-entry carry rather more destructive cargo. Maybe FedEx doesn't want the Russians mistaking one of their rockets filled with Barney DVDs for a nuclear attack and triggering World War III. I would have to imagine the PR from that sort of thing would be somewhat damaging.

    6. Re:it's funny because it's true by Valiss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you implying that a fictional book did not acurately predict the future?

      --

      -Valiss
    7. Re:it's funny because it's true by JWtW · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you're on to something. With a quick slingshot around the sun, they could start offering 'UPS Yesterday Air'

    8. Re:it's funny because it's true by monk.e.boy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps they should employ my mum: Free physical and emotional damage.

    9. Re:it's funny because it's true by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know your trying to prove a point with a bad analogy, but it is really bad.

      Energy to get information down a gable is not much at all. You are also using an example of information transport (audio) and trying to apply it to physical object transport. The GP's point was that we can transport massive amounts of information in the 3 hours it takes to fly a spaceship across the globe (in said example).

      Also since audio messages are information they are amortized with the millions of web pages sent down cables.

      An example of things not needing to ship quickly follows:

      After 911, MBNA wanted American flags with "God Bless America" to greet all of their workers world wide on the way into the office, this was decided later on in the day on September 11th. We could either print everything locally and ship it out, or get vendors in other parts of the world to print them too. In the past getting people in Dublin to print them would have required shipping negatives (30 years ago) or disks (20? years ago) or Cds (10 - 20 years ago (maybe 15 to 20?). We were able to send the file in an hour and get it produced locally on identical equipment, where previously we would have paid FedEx out the ass (and been delayed however many days for airplane to fly again). Fast physical delivery is far less important than it used to be.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:it's funny because it's true by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really quite simple. You can have anything delivered, worldwide (in areas with sufficient infrastructure) within 24 hours, often quicker for a (relatively) reasonable price. The faster something gets somewhere offers diminishing returns but exponential increases in cost. Sub-orbital ballistics can theoretically get anything anywhere in about 90 minutes, but at hideously outrageous cost (and in the real world, prep time wipes out any time advantage unless you have the craft & payload on standby at all times . . . like nukes.)

      Information, on the other hand, travels at the speed of light--limited only by the bandwidth of what you're sending, and it's dirt cheap to do so. So the options are basically:

      -Pay $ to get a reconstructable model now
      -Pay $$ to get the actual item tomorrow or
      -Pay $$$,$$$,$$$+ to get it in under 3 hours.

      So, from the perspective of FedEx, how many situations actually warrant such a rapid physical shipment knowing it's going to be so hideously expensive for the near future? Is there any real possibility of recouping costs of even seriously investigating such an idea?

      (the answer's "not yet, maybe in a couple of decades")

    11. Re:it's funny because it's true by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had a friend who was a translator for the US military who went over to the USSR (specifically Kazkhstan) as part of a disarmament mission under one of the nuclear disarmament treaties (I forget which one). She often referred to them as somewhat of a scam, as both sides kind of liked the excuse to phase out older systems and create new ones to replace them. Both sides had teams go to inspect and verify the destruction of said systems. They could inspect anything large enough to conceal a "treaty limited item", which really was just used as an excuse to snoop as much as possible. The US side sent their teams over with laser measuring devices; she said that the Russians were really impressed with that, as they had sent their teams over with a much simpler device -- a stick. If it fit, they could inspect.

      Anyways, everything to be destroyed was dismantled and ultimately crushed and scrapped. My friend saw this as somewhat tragic; here were these great feats of engineering that could deliver a payload anywhere on the planet with good accuracy in the matter of time you might spend waiting for a pizza on a busy night, and they were being wasted. Which gave her and some other members of her team an idea; wouldn't that make a great pizza delivery system if it could be retrofit instead? The concept was that you retrofit it with a new heat shield so keep the right temperature for baking, and you put uncooked pizzas in on racks welded into the "warhead". The pizzas bake on reentry, and then it detaches and parachutes down for landing. They even did some off-the-cuff estimates on how much it would cost, and they came up with, if a missile full of pizzas was ordered, a delivery charge of something like then-$20 per pizza -- but what a delivery!

      She claims that she told the idea to a Soviet officer, who looked at her like she was crazy.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
  4. Delivery failed? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    But, Planet Express is usually so reliable!

  5. Is a 30km rope by Tastecicles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...really long enough? One would have thought that to drop something 150km one would need a 150km rope? ...and something to reduce friction as the probe gets towed along the ground at 17,000 kilometres per hour....

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:Is a 30km rope by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you RTFA you'd have read that the goal wasn't to reach the earth's surface but to lower something to a lower orbit.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Is a 30km rope by eln · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but to do that, you'd need a 35,786 km rope. I think we're gonna need a bigger spacecraft to haul that thing up there.

    3. Re:Is a 30km rope by Tim82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very true.... However, if it was in geostationary orbit, the object would need to be 35,786 km from the Earth's surface, not 30 km.

    4. Re:Is a 30km rope by dmatos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Technically, to lower it down enough that it was no longer travelling at orbital velocity, at which point the tether would be released, and the capsule would fall through the atmosphere before a parachute opened up.

      Given that LEO is at least 200km, the object would still be at 170km when released, and would have to survive the entire brunt of the re-entry problems. I'm not sure how lowering something on a tether is more economical/effective than using thrust to de-orbit, though.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    5. Re:Is a 30km rope by clambake · · Score: 5, Funny

      One would have thought that to drop something 150km one would need a 150km rope?

      You don't know anything about space, clearly, so just shut up. Leave this stuff to us experts.

      (aside: Hey Bob, I have an idea why our space tether idea didn't work our right, get this: what if we used MORE than 30km of...)

  6. Close call by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    This project hangs on a thread. I don't know if they'll be able to pull it off or knot. They have to make sure they don't get tied up on this setback. It really could unravel any day.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Close call by dr_labrat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a frayed knot.....

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
  7. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    wouldn't there be an equal and opposite reaction pulling the space part down to the earth part?

  8. So much for... by Delusion_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...string theory.

  9. Previous try by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From new scientist

    Experimental space tether fails to deploy * 15:17 11 May 2007 * NewScientist.com news service * Kelly Young A trio of mini-satellites has failed in their attempt to deploy a kilometre-long tether in space. The setback means the low-cost Multi-Application Survivable Tether (MAST) experiment, launched on 17 April, may not achieve its goal of testing the survivability of a thin, braided tether in space. Over the past week, mission managers determined that the tether-deploying element, known as Ted, had properly separated from the tether inspector, a tiny satellite called Gadget. But a glitch in the restraint system kept Ted from pushing away hard enough to keep unreeling the tether from its spool. So the tether deployed just a few metres, rather than a full kilometre. Robert Hoyt, chief executive officer of Tethers Unlimited, which designed the picosatellites, says mission managers suspect they know what caused the glitch, but the company is not ready to disclose this to the public yet. "I don't think we'll ever know for sure," he says. Space tethers could one day be used to fling satellites into different orbits, thus saving satellite companies money on fuel. Or tethers could enable clusters of satellites to fly in formation and prevent them from drifting away from one another over time. Such an application might be useful in interferometry, where images from several telescopes, spaced some distance apart, are combined to give greater resolution. Some data Despite the setback, the MAST team at Tethers Unlimited, a company in Bothell, Washington, US, still may be able to get other data from Gadget to learn how a short tether behaves in microgravity. MAST team members discussed having Gadget crawl down the tether to Ted to try to restart the deployment, but they decided that option was too risky. "If we were to have Gadget start to crawl, there is the possibility of the satellites banging together, which would be very likely to damage solar cells and other systems," Hoyt says. This was not the first setback for the mission, which costs less than $1 million. After launch, the satellite team could not get a signal from Ted (see No signal yet heard from tether-deploying satellite). But they said that this should not have affected Ted's ability to deploy the tether. Longest tether Then, sky watchers who had been on the lookout for the deployed tether and satellites from the ground had not seen anything when MAST was scheduled to appear overhead. "That's one confirmation that the tether is not deployed to a very long length," Hoyt told New Scientist. In other space tether news, the longest planned space tether just got a little closer to launch. The satellite, a project of 500 students in Europe known as Young Engineers Satellite 2 (YES2), was shipped to its launch site in Russia from the Netherlands on 10 May. YES2, a project of the European Space Agency, is scheduled to launch in September. If everything goes as planned, the satellite will unroll a 30-kilometre-long tether that is a mere 0.5 millimetres thick. The end of the tether will be attached to a small round capsule called Fotino that will eventually re-enter Earth's atmosphere and attempt to land
  10. Re:Space Elevators endanger EVERYONE. by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the years since the publication of Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy, alternative models for space elevators have been proposed that would not have the elevator falling down upon the Earth were it severed. See the Wikipedia article on the subject, as this is a frequently asked question.

  11. Story is not complete by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The rope did not only not unwind fully, it started going back into the spacecraft. Representatives from the manufactuer of the rope-unwinding mechanism, Duncan YY Heavy Industries, were unavailable for comment.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  12. The Proper Way to Do It by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they bothered to do some research they would've found out that the way to do this is to sit in a cloth, put on a turban, and play a flute in front of a basket with a rope coiled in it until it went up into the sky. Then you have a little kid climb up it.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  13. Spooling is hard by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Managing big spools of line is surprisingly difficult. Oceanographers run into this all the time, as they try to lower a few miles of line into the ocean. The textile industry runs into it when they try to use very large spools so they can run machinery longer without splicing. Designing something to unspool 30Km of line under near-zero tension in zero G is non-trivial.

    Here's a discussion of spool winding, if you're really interested. There are even companies that specialize in spool winding.

    1. Re:Spooling is hard by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The whale line is only two thirds of an inch in thickness. At first sight, you would not think it so strong as it really is. By experiment its one and fifty yarns will each suspend a weight of one hundred and twenty pounds; so that the whole rope will bear a strain nearly equal to three tons. In length, the common sperm whale-line measures something over two hundred fathoms. Towards the stern of the boat it is spirally coiled away in the tub, not like the worm-pipe of a still though, but so as to form one round, cheese-shaped mass of densely bedded sheaves, or layers of concentric spiralizations, without any hollow but the heart, or minute vertical tube formed at the axis of the cheese. As the least tangle or kink in the coiling would, in running out, infallibly take somebody's arm, leg, or entire body off, the utmost precaution is used in stowing the line in its tub. Some harpooneers will consume almost an entire morning in this business, carrying the line high aloft and then reeving it downwards through a block towards the tub, so as in the act of coiling to free it from all possible wrinkles and twists."

      --Herman Melville, "Moby-Dick, or the Whale"

  14. Tether Enabled SSTO by StCredZero · · Score: 5, Informative

    HASTOL stands for Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch. This was studied by NASA. We currently have a hard time with a winged craft that can make it to orbit. Space elevators also require "Unobtanium" with unattainably high tensile strengths. But if we combine the two, we get something which is both technically feasible and capable of dirt-cheap earth to orbit. Basically, have an aircraft capable of very high altitude, and about half orbital velocity rendevous with a rotating tether (Rotovator) that can take a cargo the rest of the way to orbit.

    PDF
    View as HTML
    More Cosmic Rope Tricks

    1. Re:Tether Enabled SSTO by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Basically, the Rotovator stores kinetic energy which is transferred to the cargo being lifted. The Rotovator can be gradually accelerated back to its former speed by very high efficiency engines, like ion engines. This is much more economical than chemical rockets because: 1) the very high exhaust velocities reduce the fuel required by a couple of order of magnitude and 2) you can refuel periodically using the Rotorvator itself.

      In addition, power can be beamed to the Rotorvator from the earth using lasers or microwaves, which further reduces the weight of the entire system.

  15. Re:Space Elevators endanger EVERYONE. by lewiscr · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Seriously, get off this planet.

    We're trying. STFU.

  16. Weird reversal of space pen gag by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Russia, they spend millions of dollars developing space cable to lower object from space. In America, we just wait for gravity to bring it down!

    --
    stuff |
  17. Re:Space Elevators endanger EVERYONE. by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone's lives aren't yours to fuck with, you pompous pricks.

    Yeah, let's go back to the days when science didn't create problems like this so that we can all die of the plague as nature intended. You science types, how dare you think that you can continue to dicker in my affairs.

    I'm outta here. I need to go chop wood for 12 hours a day so I don't freeze to death this winter.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  18. Re:Space Elevators endanger EVERYONE. by hab136 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want your life and property under yet another constant threat, buy your own planet and move there. [...] Seriously, get off this planet.

    Duh, that's why we're building a space elevator!

    I'm sick and tired of the freewheeling science geeks that find new ways to put us all at risk with their useless toys, generation after generation.

    Yeah, germ theory, that polio vaccine, seat belts, and global communications (like the internet) are evil. Those bastards. /sarcasm

    Nobody but a selfish minority is interested in anyone making black holes in particle accelerators, building doomsday devices or suspending lethal pieces of engineering above everyone's heads.

    You seem to think that the scientists building these things are either suicidal or incompetent (unable to assess the risks). I'd argue the people doing this advanced, risky thinks are smarter than either of us.

    As for a "selfish minority" endangering the rest of the populace - no. The major threats to human life are heart disease and cancer (>50% of deaths in the US), automobiles (40k deaths/year), and other humans (homicide/suicide/police/military). New methods of space travel/delivery? Not so much.

    You seem to really hate science for some reason. Arguing a project is risky is one thing; namecalling is just blind prejudice.
  19. They were actually pretty close by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since 30000 feet = 9.14km...

    Ah wait...

    This isn't NASA.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  20. Russian mission control, but ESA Student satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    The space rope trick was actually an ESA students project: YES2, the second Young Engineers Satellite.

    According to the article at ESA:

    The Second Young Engineers' Satellite (YES2) was activated and separated from the Foton-M3 spacecraft earlier today. The tether deployed for 8.5 km, after which the Fotino capsule was released on its way to Earth.

    "We are very proud of the students' work, although we didn't reach the full 30 km deployment" said Roger Walker, YES2 project manager for ESA's Education Office. "The hard work of the YES2 team over the past five years has paid off with this largely successful demonstration."

    YES2 was part of the Foton-M3 experiment, which concluded succesfully today.

    The reentry capsule for the Foton-M3 spacecraft, which has been in low-Earth orbit for the last 12 days, successfully landed this morning in an uninhabited area 150 km south of the town of Kustanay in Kazakhstan, close to the Russian border, at 09:58 CEST, 13:58 local time.

    The unmanned Foton spacecraft, which was launched on 14 September from Baikonur Cosmodrome, in Kazakhstan, carried a payload of 43 European experiments in a range of scientific disciplines - including fluid physics, biology, crystal growth, radiation exposure and exobiology.

    Why the submitter didn't link to ESA is beyond me.
  21. FedEx Satellites by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interestingly enough, FedEx does/did have satellites. Why you ask? In the 1980's what was then Federal Express worked with the fax companies to develop the Group III fax standard. Every FedEx station got one of these large fax machine complete with hard drives and a plain paper printer. The theory was, people would go to a FedEx location, have their documents faxed to somewhere else, where, for a fee, a courier would deliver it to the recipient. Alternately, high value customers, like law firms, would get a smaller thermal machines for mostly sending to the FedEx station which would forward it to the target station for delivery. The satellites were used to route the data between stations w/o using a phone line. Remember, this was before the Internet, and most companies who used fax would buy them in pairs to send between sites. Almost no one else would have a fax machine that could talk to your fax machine.

    Federal Express spend *billions* on the system, and it failed utterly. What happened was the same companies that helped them develop the Group III standard made their thermal machines cheap and interoperatable. Soon, everyone had them, and the thermal paper wasn't too bad. You could always photocopy it once if you wanted a more permanent record. That, and falling long distance phone prices made it overall cheaper to fax a document than to have FedEx do it for you.

    To sum up, FedEx has already been to space. They are looking at it, and it's always way too expensive for any kind of regular service. (except some data)

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  22. Re:Space Elevators endanger EVERYONE. by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even sci-fi authors like Kim Stanley Robinson have included disaster scenarios when contemplating this technology, but irl nobody ever discusses the massive dangers. Er, you don't think the possible dangers haven't been discussed, modeled, etc? Here, have a paper I found in about 30 seconds. See page 10:

    Below about 43 km, vterm is below 10 m/s. This confirms what was stated in Edwards (2000b, Sec. 10.9): the ribbon will reach the ground at a very low velocity, and there will be no impact damage due to the ribbon falling. ... [pg 11] For a 20 T elevator, with a breaking point of 130 GPa, the maximum tension that can be achieved anywhere along the ribbon before it breaks is 1 MN. The Fate of a Broken Space Elevator corresponding force is 1.1 kN (about 110 kg) at 1 m of height, ten times more at 100 m of height. A building (100 m) should be undisturbed by this force, and a person (1 m) may be trapped, but should not be hurt. ... [pg 13] After an intense deceleration phase the ribbon falls slowly to the ground at less than 1 m/s In future, either learn to troll better, or learn to use Google. And perhaps update your mental model of "teh scientists!1!111!" to take into account the likelihood that they're rather less dense than you
  23. Pushing rope by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, pushing rope is known to be a problem, while smoking rope is an acient passtime. When they finally did manage to talk to the satellite, it said: "Hey, dude...".

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  24. After a minute and a half on Google. by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I get the following:

    The tether was made of Dyneema.

    Wikipedia says this is a synonym for ultra high molecular weight polyethylene

        Regarding the weaknesses of UHMWPE, thermal properties are highlighted and consist of the following:

    The weak bonding between olefin molecules allows local thermal excitations to disrupt the crystalline order of a given chain piece-by-piece, giving it much poorer heat resistance than other high-strength fibers. Its melting point is around 144 to 152 degrees Celsius, and according to DSM, it is not advisable to use UHMWPE fibers at temperatures exceeding 80 to 100C for long periods of time. It becomes brittle at temperatures below -150C.

          Googling for the temperature outside of the space station turns up a Yahoo answers page.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061215121108AASpIMx&show=7

            Which says the answer is -250 F. Convert to Celsius and we get -156.7C

              Maybe this helps to explain what might have happened.

    1. Re:After a minute and a half on Google. by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ambient "temperature" is somewhat of an abstract concept when there's effectively no atmosphere. What matters most to how warm you are is how much radiation you're absorbing and how much you're radiating. I.e., insulation and color.

      There's no way that they didn't consider the temperature of the tether. You consider the temperature of *everything* that goes into space.

      What probably ruined this experiment is what ruined past experiments: oscillations. You can get axial oscillations from all sorts of sources, even things as little as variations in the speed of the motor can build up because of resonance. There's almost nothing to dampen them. We've had tethers outright snap because of this. We've also had tethers snap because of other things, of course. My "favorite" was the tether whose insulation had tiny pockets of trapped gas that expanded in the vaccum of space. The tether had become very high voltage because of moving through Earth's magnetic field, and the leak of gas allowed it to discharge in a plasma arc that cut the tether in half.

      Not so simple a process as it at first seems.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    2. Re:After a minute and a half on Google. by RodgerDodger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really, because temperature in space doesn't work the way you seem to think it does.

      If it's -20C on Earth, a human will lose heat fast. Why? Because the heat will transfer from the person to the surrounding air via conduction.

      In space, there's no air (duh). That means you don't lose heat from conduction - only via radiating. Furthermore, if this experiment was done in sunlight (probably), then rather than losing heat energy, the line would almost certainly have been gaining it.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  25. Sounds impressively dangerous by dstone · · Score: 2, Funny
    From TFA...

    the tether only unfolded to a length of 8.5 kilometres after being released from the spacecraft orbiting around 300 kilometres above Earth ... Mission Control would try to calculate the capsule's orbit and determine when and where it would land ... the tether deployed Tuesday is half a millimetre thick and is made of Dyneema, which the ESA described as the world's strongest fibre Heads up! Light, unbreakable, invisible rope flailing around...