Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

1-Click Rejection Rejected

Posted by kdawson on from the lawyering-obviousness dept.

theodp writes "On Wednesday, a three-judge USPTO panel convened at Amazon's request rejected a USPTO Examiner's rejection of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos's 1-Click patent, ruling that it wasn't obvious to them what the Examiner found obvious. The application has been remanded to the Examiner with instructions to make the obviousness more obvious."

3 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Can you confuse me more? by mfh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    He rejected the rejector's rejection? Hmmm. K.

    Please, Slashdot editors, you gave me a buffer overflow. Try to explain those kinds of twisted stories better before throwing the green-light. I now have to READ THE EFFING ARTICLE, before knowing what it's really about. :(

    I like to be able to make a decision of whether something is worth my time BEFORE reading it.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  2. Re:An Obligatory, just for you by condition-label-red · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah! I just KNEW there was one....

    --
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  3. Re:This post, which is first by nutshell42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin, then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it." Amen.

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage