Slashdot Mirror


1-Click Rejection Rejected

theodp writes "On Wednesday, a three-judge USPTO panel convened at Amazon's request rejected a USPTO Examiner's rejection of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos's 1-Click patent, ruling that it wasn't obvious to them what the Examiner found obvious. The application has been remanded to the Examiner with instructions to make the obviousness more obvious."

23 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. But... by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, but... It's so OBVIOUS!

    Seriously, though... If there's even a single person that can't see what's obvious about this in the patent office, there needs to be firings until there isn't. This is pretty much the definition of obvious. Heck, if the person even had access to the internet, they'd have fallen across rants about its obviousness every other month.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You could probably patent breathing if you'd word it something like:

      Method of obtaining oxygen while at the same time getting rid of carbon dioxide in intra-body transportation liquids by periodically increasing and decreasing the interior volume of a intra-body cavity connected with the outside air supply through a flexible biological tube, where the walls of the intra-body cavity are connected with the inter-body transport liquid system through semipermeable membranes which allow diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide between the transportation liquid and the air.

      Funny thing is, the captcha is "breath" :-)

  2. Obviousness by geoffrobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    It isn't obvious to me why they couldn't find obvious what the examiner found non-obvious.

    Obviously?

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Obviousness by nuzak · · Score: 3, Funny

      PTO: Well, I reject your rejected rejection rejection and no tagbacks!

      Pwned! Should have seen that one coming, obviously.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  3. This post, which is first by PresidentEnder · · Score: 4, Funny

    The post which is first comes before the other posts. That is, it is the first post, if read in chronological order. Its firstness is determined by the earliness of its posting.

    But no matter how hard I try, I still can't make this as confusing as the summary.

    --
    I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    1. Re:This post, which is first by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 3, Funny

      But you can make it as obviously wrong as the rejected rejection of the obviously obvious...

      --
      Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
  4. You're joking...right? by condition-label-red · · Score: 5, Funny

    There has GOT to be a Monty Python joke in there somewhere....

    --
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
    1. Re:You're joking...right? by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sir Lancelot stops to keep from marching into a giant hole.

      Sir Lancelot: Halt here!

      Servants stop.

      Servant: Why'd we stop sire?

      Sir Lancelot: Well isn't it obvious?

      Servant: Isn't what obvious?

      Sir Lancelot: Why we stopped, isn't it obvious?

      Servant: That's what I was asking.

      Sir Lancelot: There's a giant hole there.

      Servant: Ahh, I see, great job stopping there. Fine job indeed. I shall tell tales of your decisiveness and cunning.

      Sir Lancelot: Decisiveness and cunning? But it was obvious!

      Servant: What was obvious?

      Sir Lancelot: Stopping in front of the hole there of course.

      Servant: Well, that might have been obvious to someone such as you, your excellence. But I'd hardly call that obvious.

      Sir Lancelot: But it's a hole!

      Servant: Yes... Yes it is...

      Sir Lancelot: And it's quite deep.

      Servant: Yes sir, quite deep indeed.

      Sir Lancelot: And falling down it would've indeed injured us.

      Servant: Perhaps so, your excellence, perhaps so.

      Sir Lancelot: So it was obvious to stop then!

      Servant: To someone with your skills and decisiveness perhaps.

      Sir Lancelot: Are you saying you wouldn't have stopped then?

      Servant: Perhaps not.

      Sir Lancelot: But you would of fallen.

      Servant: Probably yes, your majesty.

      Sir Lancelot: Did you see the hole?

      Servant: Yes, yes I did, it was a quite impressive hole.

      Sir Lancelot: But you would've still gone?

      Servant: Perhaps.

      Sir Lancelot: But WHY?!? IT WAS OBVIOUS THEN!

      Servant: No offense, but maybe to you it was obvious, your excellence. But to me it was less so.

      King Arthur strides up with servants.

      King Arthur: HALT HERE!

      Servants and Arthur halt.

      King Arthur: Why have you stopped here Lancelot?

      Sir Lancelot: Well, isn't it obvious?

      Servant: Here he goes again, twas what we were just discussing.

      King Arthur: AHA the hole, but wait, why did we stop? There's a bridge over there.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  5. Even More Trouble by organgtool · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bezos was reported to be so mad about this ruling that he began throwing chairs and now he's getting legal threats from some CEO in Redmond who claims to have a patent on chair launching.

    1. Re:Even More Trouble by aweiland · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually there is prior art on chair launching. Seems a fellow named Bob Knight did it first.

    2. Re:Even More Trouble by deniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bill should step down and make Steve chairman just for the joke value.

    3. Re:Even More Trouble by FredDC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, but since when does prior art matter when giving out patents?

      --
      09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63
    4. Re:Even More Trouble by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe with folding chairs, but Ballmer pioneered in the field when he launched office furniture. Definitely worthy of a patent under the current USPTO.

  6. 1 click rejection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like me in high school...

  7. 1-Click Rejection by biocute · · Score: 2, Funny

    At first I thought someone tried to patent this " 1-Click Rejection" feature, and Slashdot would have to be paying $0.20 for every submission they easily rejected with one click.

  8. We need a hero to save the day. by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where's Captain Obvious when you need him the most?!

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  9. Re:Firehose antics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But a direct link means you only have to use 1-click to get to the documents.

  10. Half-click shopping ... by MacTO · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is time to patent a brilliant new system that will help e-commerce vendors rake in billions of dollars: half-click shopping. Rather than waiting for the MOUSE_UP event after a MOUSE_DOWN event, we will use the MOUSE_DOWN event itself to close the transaction. This will ensure that all of those customers who initiate a click in a moment of shopping excitement will not be able to prematurely terminate a transaction by dragging their mouse pointer off of the link element before releasing the mouse button. Just imagine all of the extra transactions that will initiate! Next up, Zero-click shopping by using MOUSE_OVERs.

    1. Re:Half-click shopping ... by IronChef · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are correct. Shopping that seems to defy the Arrow of Time is the future of ecommerce. Marketing is calling it "Lightspeed Shopping" for now. Reasonably priced licenses are available now, contact me for details.

      When a new potential revenue stream is instantiated (ie, born) the retailer references the birth record and local demographics. Based on the instance's socioeconomic class and other factors, a queue of products is created and stored in a database. The instance will then receive products and bills without intervention for the remainder of their lives. (Geolocation data from the instance's mobile phone can be used to update the product stream in near real time. You have probably already seen some fascinating articles about this in the standard publications, eg J Retail Sci.)

      Advanced collaborative filtering will be used to ensure that the product stream is highly relevant to the instance's lifestyle. Obviously, this method is patented. The specific database techniques used to store the predicted product stream has also yielded an unreasonably broad patent, which we are very excited about.

      Eventually, the legislature may wish to allow our revenue streams to opt out of the program, so we all need to get ready to spend some time in court to protect the business model.

  11. Catch-22 by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Funny


    "Why isn't this obvious?!" Yossarian asked

    "The obviousness is just to obvious, that's why." said Captain Black

    "That... that's just stupid. If it's so obvious, you should just call it obvious and reject it." said Yossarian

    "Oh, sure. But if we did that, what would be the end result? Everyone would spend all their time trying to force themselves to think of non-obvious things." said Captain Black

    "What?! Isnt't that the point of this whole patenting system?!" asked Yossarian

    "NO! That's exactly my point - have you ever seen a good invention, I mean a really good invention? What makes you say it's a good invention - I'll tell you, it's because it makes so much sense for the situation its in! The really good inventions are only the ones that are SO obvious you never thought of them before. So, therefore, we decided it's really best that if an invention seems TOO obvious, it obviously must be something we have to encourage, and therefore has to be accepted BECAUSE it was too obvious." said Captain Black

    -

    Ryan Fenton

  12. Re:Firehose antics... by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If a "provisional" nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) rejection is the only rejection remaining in the earlier filed of the two pending applications, while the later-filed application is rejectable on other grounds, the examiner should withdraw that rejection and permit the earlier-filed application to issue as a patent without a terminal disclaimer."

    Clear now?

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  13. An Obligatory, just for you by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sir Lancelot: We were in the nick of time. You were obvious.
    Sir Galahad: I don't think I was.
    Sir Lancelot: Yes, you were. You were very obvious
    Sir Galahad: Look, let me go back in there and be obvious
    Sir Lancelot: No, it's too obvious
    Sir Galahad: Look, it's my duty as a knight to be as obvious as I can.
    Sir Lancelot: No, we've got to find the Holy Patent. Come on.
    Sir Galahad: Oh, let me have just a little bit obviousness?
    Sir Lancelot: No. It's unhealthy.
    Sir Galahad: I bet you're Jeff Bezos.
    Sir Lancelot: Am not.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  14. Re:Parent violated patent! by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

    I P.S.
    Your link leads to nowhere.

    That's what you think. In fact, you've just ordered a 36 volume encyclopaedia, and the first instalment of $199.99 will be debited from your credit card next month.

    That's what comes of not reviewing your order.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?