Slashdot Mirror


Indiana Jones Gets Robbed

HotChk101 writes "Over 2000 production stills, plenty of sensitive paperwork including a complete production budget breakdown, possibly the script from Indiana Jones 4 and multiple computers were stolen from Steven Spielberg's Universal Studio office. The thief started contacting multiple entertainment websites including TMZ.com and offering the stolen goods for a sum of $2000.00."

53 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. New Movie Title by badenglishihave · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of Indiana Jones"

    1. Re:New Movie Title by PriceIke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steven Spielberg's office lies at the end long underground tunnel, protected by a series of trecherous and deadly booby traps. The thief narrowly escaped clutching the script, only to find himself lying on the Paramount studio lot surrounded by lawyers threateningly aiming pens at him.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:New Movie Title by iggy_mon · · Score: 2, Funny

      not only that but all he wanted was $2000!

      must have been the plans for the re-re-re-issue... now with 1.3 seconds of extra bloopers!

      --
      --iggy_mon - www.ananonymouskiller.com - Die Trying -
    3. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean walkie talkies right?

    4. Re:New Movie Title by pushf+popf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny: "What a marooon!

      If it was a Linux laptop with disk encryption enabled, all he would have is a cool paperweight.

    5. Re:New Movie Title by IcyNeko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look, dude, if the thief had to outrun a huge rolling ball, I think he earned what he stole. :D

    6. Re:New Movie Title by Scaba · · Score: 4, Funny

      He actually wanted $200,000 until he read the script.

    7. Re:New Movie Title by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      He had only gotten that far because he remembered that in Latin, "George Lucas" begins with an "I."

    8. Re:New Movie Title by dapyx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Allegedly, after reading the script, the thief exclaimed "This belongs in a museum!".

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    9. Re:New Movie Title by cashman73 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard he just wanted $2, and he sent a young punk kid on a bicycle to collect it!

    10. Re:New Movie Title by MicktheMech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marcus Brody: "You see... the pen is mightier than the sword!"
      Dr. Jones, Sr.: "I'll take the Penis Mightier..."
    11. Re:New Movie Title by Bassman59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't remember the rest of the joke, but you're mother's a whore.

      I'd mod this as Funny, but there's an egregious spelling error (you're instead of your). Nice try, though.

    12. Re:New Movie Title by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whereupon he exclaimed, "Snakes! I hate snakes!"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:New Movie Title by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these days, someone is going to come on /. and post an elaborate article proving that time travel is possible and giving exact specifications on how to build an actual working time travel machine. And on that day, half of the comments will be dedicated exclusively to criticizing his spelling and grammar.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:New Movie Title by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Naw, the other half would be complaining about the dupe since the exact same article was posted 5 years later.

    15. Re:New Movie Title by StarvingSE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Asps... very dangerous. You go first.

      --
      I got nothin'
  2. $2000? by xmarkd400x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who is this guy, Dr. Evil?

    1. Re:$2000? by drakaan · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...I hope no one buys the stuff and they get caught. This kind of theft is certainly less harmful than stealing someone's life savings, but it's still criminal, and I'd still like to see justice done.

      I'm reminded of a meme that's missing from the currently active slashdot poll, namely "RTFA".

      From the article:

      ...We have been told that the thief was apprehended by LAPD and the FBI with the help of a member of the online press that had been offered the stolen property. Sources tell us that an undercover sting operation was set in motion late last night with the help of the unnamed member of the online press...
      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    2. Re:$2000? by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Must be Canadian dollars. USD$2000 isn't very much.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:$2000? by ajs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm reminded of a meme that's missing from the currently active slashdot poll, namely "RTFA" No.

      I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, but I read Slashdot because I don't have time to read a dozen articles about nonsense. I instead read a quick summary and fire off a comment if it strikes me as worth it. I've done so for many years, and will continue to do so.

      If article summaries can't be written clearly enough to convey the basics accurately, then I'll have a misleading idea about what's in the article, and may post less useful comments. There's not much I can do about that without adding a 25th hour to the day.
  3. $2000?!?!? by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny

    One word: moron

    One more word: lawsuit

    Don't be surprised when they find this guy lying dead in his bed in his apartment, having been killed by whip-wielding maniac...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:$2000?!?!? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      They caught him already. He tried to sell the stuff to a member of the press, who reported it to the police, and a sting operation was carried out. Read the article. :)

      Apparently one TV station actually did buy it and was about to reveal what they had found until Paramount's lawyers stepped in. Which although normally I'm rather opposed to lawyers, in this case I'm rather ambivalent about it; who wants to have the show spoiled for them anyway?

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:$2000?!?!? by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I read the article, I'd be well informed and able to make cogent comments... and that is strictly against Slashdot policy... ;)

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:$2000?!?!? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're ambivalent about people buying stolen property? You do realize it's a crime to purchase stolen property? You're right. That's why I refuse to pay for anything I pirate.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:$2000?!?!? by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I read the article, I'd be well informed and able to make cogent comments... and that is strictly against Slashdot policy... ;)

      I don't RTFA, because I'm a nice guy. Reading the article robs others of the opportunity to clarify the story and increase their karma. :P
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  4. Dr. Jones... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Again we see that there is nothing you can possess which I cannot take away.


    (source)

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Dr. Jones... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Funny

      It belongs in a museum!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  5. Cue Dr. Evil. by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Funny

    "and I want... TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS!"

    "Uh, really? OK, sure."

  6. can't resist by Leemeng · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So once again, Jones, what was briefly yours is now mine."

  7. I think the thief... by Dougmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...misplaced his decimal point.

  8. Sounds good to me. by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm ready to pay that price to make sure there is no jarjar or ewok-like caracter in the film, and if needed, the double to make sure Lucas is no longer involved in any artistic part of the production.

  9. Marketing ploy? by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We'll see. If the charges are dropped, then I say it was a marketing ploy. If not, well, then just a really stupid thief.

  10. talk about inept security... by PJ1216 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    multiple computers The thief (singular) walked away with multiple computers? That requires multiple trips into the office. The security is bad no matter how you look at it. Either
    A) One guy makes multiple trips back and forth to carry all this stuff... unless he's superman and can carry multiple computers.
    B) A group of guys gets past security. One guy getting past I can see, but an entire group getting past should make it easier to catch them.

    Has anyone given any thought to this being a publicity stunt? I mean, the information has yet to be leaked and for $2000, I would bet plenty of people would have found a way to get into contact with this guy and purchase it for themselves.

    Something just seems unbelievable here.
    1. Re:talk about inept security... by filterban · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't necessarily mean multiple trips. It would be pretty easy to carry five or six laptops at once.

      --
      rm -rf /
  11. It happened to Coppola, too... by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Informative

    A very similar thing happened to Coppola a few days back:

    http://www.zap2it.com/movies/news/zap-coppolascriptburgled,0,3773984.story

    1. Re:It happened to Coppola, too... by nurhussein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is interesting.

      Spielberg, Lucas and Coppola were known as "the three amigos" right? Could there be a connection?

  12. Re:Only $2000?! by timster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh-huh... because only real go-getters are watching TV in the middle of the day when The Price is Right comes on.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  13. Not surprisingly by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spielberg first realized the script had been stolen after the security system's boulder had crashed through the Universal Studios cafeteria earlier that day.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  14. It's not theft... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's copyright infringement. Oh, darn it. Wrong story.

  15. Re:They should call me by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But no one else knows it yet! what an idiot :P

  16. Re:I got to know by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He is not an archaeologist, he is a treasure hunter...just ask any archaeologist.

    That's like saying Jaws is a nerd/geek flick. Or the Godfather. Yes, good movies but they are embraced by the general culture, not nerd/geek culture.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Re:err, hello. by crow · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. You are a thief from the moment you commit the crime. The media will say "alleged" because they don't want to make a judgement, especially if doing so can get them sued.

    Further, if there was a theft, then it was committed by a thief. Since they haven't accused someone, there is no alleged thief, but since someone did it, there is a thief.

    Of course, some have said that it is an alleged theft, because it may have been an authorized publicity stunt, so it may not have been stealing. (Though there would be an issue with filing a false police report or something like that.)

  18. If you've got something worthless... by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    put a high price tag on it, and watch the buyers flock. Try giving kittens away. Its hard, because when people evaluate if they should take one of your kittens, they will think of the problems of owning a cat. Now try selling kittens for 100$ each. Its about as hard as giving them away because the cost will draw attention away from the other problems, but it will also earn you money.

    Same applies here. For 2000$, the big issue for the buyer is that he's buying something illegal that might actually not contain anything really interesting. For 200 000$, the big issue is to get the cash.

  19. Re:Thats great! by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the time Raiders IV is released, $2000 will get you a movie ticket and a small popcorn.

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  20. Re:Squandered potential by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny
    What's better than the Raiders' big round boulder? Two of them. Two different directions.

    You already mentioned Lara Croft!

  21. Used to work on the Paramount lot... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...so I'm getting a kick...

    No, really, once you're past the front gate, it is absolutely astonishing how little security there is. Unless you're obviously over-the-top out of place (like, say, streaking, maybe), people just leave you alone--and hauling a cart full of equipment back and forth to the parking lot is actually /less/ suspicious in that environment than wandering around with nothing in hand.

    I mean, just imagine what a nightmare a facility like that would be if they stopped and questioned everyone pushing a loaded dolly.

  22. Backup by kalel666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortunately, everything was backed up on Francis Ford Coppollas hard drive.

    Oh, shit.

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  23. Re:Episode 5: by flitty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obligatory:

    "I'm holding this ransom, for two, THOUSAND, dollars!"
    "actually sir, $2,000 by today's standards isn't that much..."
    "ok, two, THOUSAND.... Million, dollars!"

    --
    Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
  24. I bet it was Nazis. . . by uberjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate those guys.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  25. Re:Thats great! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

    Small? You mean extra medium right?

  26. So by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Funny

    they lost the plot, then?

  27. Re:Thats great! by durnurd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Raiders IV? I wasn't aware of a Raiders II or III.

    --
    --Edward Dassmesser
  28. Wow. by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, but I read Slashdot because I don't have time to read a dozen articles about nonsense. I instead read a quick summary and fire off a comment if it strikes me as worth it. I've done so for many years, and will continue to do so.

    You mean you're actually proud enough of spouting your mouth off in ignorance to defend it as the superior option to either (a) shutting up or (b) doing a little reading? Give this man a management position! He's obviously more important that the people who read his words.

    There's not much I can do about that without adding a 25th hour to the day.

    You know what would save even more time -- not posting. With all that not posting, you might actually find the time to read something -- especially if you're posting replies to other people's replies to your posts.

    Yeesh... What a disgustingly indolent and contemptuous attitude does it take to not be a little ashamed of being wrong because you didn't do your homework? I know I often shoot my mouth off on Slashdot without having read the article, but at least I have the humility to be a little ashamed when I'm caught at it and not fire off a comment about how I can't be bothered with it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").